Arthrodesis of the trapeziometacarpal joint

[Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: Current Concepts in German-Speaking Countries]

The introduction of third-generation thumb carpometacarpal joint implants with a dual-mobility concept has significantly redefined the treatment algorithm for advanced thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Prosthetic arthroplasty is increasingly being adopted as the primary treatment choice in many clinical centres. The boundaries of prosthetic arthroplasty are being newly defined. These aspects were addressed and discussed with a broad audience during the first web symposium of the German-speaking Working Group for Hand Surgery (DAH) on 29 November 2023. This article provides an overview of the stage-dependent treatment concept of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis and summarizes the insights of the web symposium.

Total joint arthroplasty of the thumb CMC joint

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Rhizarthrosis-osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is usually a primary idiopathic disease. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the surgical treatment options for symptomatic advanced thumb CMC arthritis. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the mid-term functional and radiological results of TJA with the minimum follow-up period of 3 years after the surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Presented are the results of 136 total trapeziometacarpal joint replacements in the group of 105 patients consisted of 96 women and 9 men. Used prostheses were ELiS® implant (27 cases), Ivory® implant (42 cases), Touch® Dual mobility (67 cases). The follow-up period was minimally 3 years postoperatively. In all the patients, along with range of motion and radiologic evaluation of implant position, the function and pain of operated joint were evaluated using DASH and VAS score at regular intervals pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

At a mean of 85 months (range 38-126 months) post-operatively, patients in 116 cases (85%) reported full satisfaction and absence of symptoms and difficulties. In 12 cases (9%) some slight residual post-exercise pain was reported. In eight cases (6%) patients suffered from episodic rest-pain, but with a lower intensity than in the preoperative period. Postoperatively, the patients declared subjective improvement in hand function. The total DASH score and VAS score decreased in all patients, while ROM increased. The course of all of TJA surgeries was complication-free. Five patients needed revision surgery. In two patients a dislocation has occurred and in three cases a loosening of the cup's implant was reported. The most frequent postoperative complication was the occurrence of transient paraesthesias of the thumb in eight cases (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

TJA is the method of choice in management of advanced symptomatic osteoarthritis of the thumb CMC joint. Mastering surgical technique, TJA represents safe and effective treatment method in advanced degenerative changes of the thumb CMC joint and it's benefits exceed possible perioperative and postoperative risks.

Radial Collateral Ligament Laxity of Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint Following Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis

PURPOSE

Trapeziometacarpal (TM) arthrodesis may increase adduction motion of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, causing radial collateral ligament laxity. Stability of the MCP joint is important to the long-term functional outcome after TM arthrodesis. This study assessed preoperative and postoperative radial collateral ligament laxity using dynamic radiographs to confirm whether laxity was exacerbated after surgery and examined whether there is a relationship between the fixation angle of arthrodesis and the degree of laxity.

METHODS

Forty-four thumbs in 33 patients who underwent TM arthrodesis and were followed for at least 5 years were studied. Dynamic radiographs in radial adduction-abduction and palmar adduction-abduction were obtained. We defined the midpoint of arc of motion as the fixation angle of arthrodesis in the radial and palmar planes. We measured the intersection angle between longitudinal axis of the first metacarpal (M1) and that of thumb proximal phalanx (P1). P1M1 angle in a palmar adduction view of dynamic radiographs reflected radial collateral ligament laxity in palmar adduction (adduction P1M1 angle). We subtracted a preoperative adduction P1M1 angle from a postoperative adduction P1M1 angle and defined its value as an exacerbated adduction P1M1 angle.

RESULTS

Adduction P1M1 angle increased from 9° ± 5° to 18° ± 10°. The median exacerbated adduction P1M1 angle was 7°. Ten thumbs (23%) developed ulnar subluxation of MCP joint in the palmar adduction view of dynamic radiographs. Among them, two thumbs developed osteoarthritis of MCP joint (5%). Fixation angle of the arthrodesis was a mean of 35° ± 7° and 32° ± 9° in the radial arc and palmar arc planes, respectively. There was a positive correlation between increasing adduction P1M1 angle and TM arthrodesis in an increasingly palmarly abducted position.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial collateral ligament laxity of thumb MCP joint was exacerbated after TM arthrodesis. Greater fixation angle in palmar abduction resulted in more laxity of the joint.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Outcomes of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis Treated with Arthroscopic Fusion

Background  The thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) osteoarthritis is one of the most common pathologies in the hand with controversial treatment options. Description of Technique  Describe the use of arthroscopic technique for thumb CMCJ arthrodesis and the clinical outcome. Patients and Methods  Cases with Eaton III thumb CMCJ osteoarthritis treated with arthroscopic arthrodesis were reviewed. Patient evaluations include: grip strength, pinch strength, range of motion, Kapandji score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the visual analog scores for pain. All cases were assessed before the surgery and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Radiographs were reviewed. Results  There were total 16 patients with 18 arthrodesis performed. The average age was 62.2 years with M:F ratio of 2:7. The average follow-up time was 57.2 months. There was improvement of pain score as early as at postop 3 months ( p  < 0.001) and continued to improve at 6, 12, and 24 months. There was improvement of grip strength and pinch strength at 12 and 24 months (p < 0.001). The DASH score showed improvement as early as at 3 months ( p  = 0.012). There was a reduction of Kapandji score and interphalangeal joint motion at 3 months postop, but these returned to normal at 6 months. There was no major complication. There was one case of nonunion (5.6%). Conclusion  Arthroscopic arthrodesis is a feasible treatment option and provides excellent pain relief, restore thumb strength and stability, retain functional thumb mobility, and hence improvement in hand function.

Arthrodesis for Primary Osteoarthritis of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Using Multiple Kirschner Wires and Tension Band Wire in Female Patients Older than 40

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of arthrodesis with multiple Kirschner (K)-wires and tension band wire for primary osteoarthritis of trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint in female patients aged 40 years or older. Methods: We retrospectively obtained data regarding all female patients 40 years or older who underwent TM joint arthrodesis for TM joint osteoarthritis with K-wires and tension band wire over a 10-year period from 2009 till 2019. Thumb length, active range of motion (ROM) at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, active ROM of radial and volar adduction and abduction and key pinch strength was measured. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using a pain and satisfaction questionnaire and the DASH score. We also recorded postoperative complications. Results: The study included 60 thumbs in 49 patients with an average age 60 years and a mean follow-up of 40 ± 21 months. All but one thumb had radiographic evidence of fusion within 6 months and the union rate was 98%. Key pinch strength increased from 2.3 to 4.9 kg after surgery. Total arc of motion in radial adduction-abduction decreased from 16° to 10°. Total arc of motion in volar adduction-abduction decreased from 25° to 9°. One patient experienced attritional rupture of the flexor pollicis longus tendon attributed to a K-wire penetration into the carpal tunnel. Although 46 thumbs (77%) had no or mild hardware-related symptoms, they underwent hardware removal after solid bone union. In 23 thumbs with follow-up period longer than 48 months, two thumbs developed scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint arthritis and two thumbs developed metacarpophalangeal joint arthritis. Conclusions: We found that arthrodesis with multiple K-wires and tension band wire is a valuable option in the management of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis in female patients aged 40 years or older. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Carpometacarpal Arthrodesis: Indications and Techniques

Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis is a beneficial surgery for young and higher-demand patients who have trapeziometacarpal arthritis. Surgical techniques can vary, but certain aspects of the surgery are critical, including bony preparation and positioning of the thumb in space. Reported outcomes are generally favorable, although the quality of evidence is poor. There are no comparison studies assessing different arthrodesis techniques, and only a few comparing arthrodesis to the trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty procedures. Most published results are case series with retrospectively collected data.

Influence of the trapeziometacarpal joint fusion on thumb muscles and thumb-tip movement: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrodesis provides stability and strength of the thumb, whereas fixation of the TMC joint restricts motion of the thumb, which may consequently impair the activity of daily living. The objective of our study was to investigate how length and area of the thumb-tip trajectory were reduced after the TMC joint fusion.

METHODS

Six fresh, frozen cadavers were used for this study. Tension was applied to the distal tendons of 4 extrinsic thumb muscles (extensor pollicis longus, flexor pollicis longus, abductor pollicis longus, and extensor pollicis brevis) by servomotor, whereas tension was applied to 4 intrinsic muscles (abductor pollicis brevis, opponens pollicis, flexor pollicis brevis, and adductor pollicis) using static weights. The thumb-tip trajectory was examined using a motion capture system without tension and with 5 different weights to induce intrinsic muscle tension before and after the TMC joint fusion.

FINDINGS

When tension was applied to the intrinsic muscles, the length of the thumb-tip trajectory decreased in all conditions compared with that before the TMC joint fusion, whereas the trajectory decreased only when the abductor pollicis longus was pulled. The overall thumb-tip trajectory area was reduced to approximately 30% compared with that before the TMC joint fusion.

INTERPRETATION

Thumb-tip trajectory was restricted by the TMC joint fusion to approximately 30%. However, the reduced area was found tolerable for performing daily activities. Thus, arthrodesis can be the first-line treatment in patients who wish to engage in activities of daily living without difficulties.

Arthroscopic treatment of basal joint arthritis by partial trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction: Short-term results from a prospective study of 20 patients

Partial trapeziectomy for basal joint arthritis is an alternative to total trapeziectomy that preserves the height of the thumb column. Using arthroscopy reduces the incidence of periarticular lesions and the risks of complications. The purpose of this prospective single-center study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy combined with suspension and interposition ligament reconstruction using half of the abductor pollicis longus tendon. Twenty patients (18 women, 2 men) with a mean age of 55 years (43-65 years) were operated using this technique between November 2013 to February 2015. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The 20 patients were reviewed after 12 months. The subjective QuickDASH score improved from the 3rd post-operative month (P = 0.0029) from 50.6 preoperatively to 30.3 after 3 months, 17.6 after 6 months and 9.6 after 12 months. Pain was reduced in the 1st month post-operative (P < 0.0001). The Kapandji Score and pinch strength improved from the 3rd month (P = 0.034). Return to work was possible for 19% of employed patients after 1 month, 44% after 3 months and 87.5% after 6 and 12 months. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied after 3 months and 95% after 6 and 12 months. Pain levels, range of motion and QuickDASH Score are similar to those of open partial trapeziectomy described in the literature. However, recovery seems to be faster with this arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopic treatment of basal joint arthritis, which limits capsule and ligament lesions, leads to good short- and medium-term results in terms of pain relief and thumb motion while preserving strength. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 (Prospective, non-randomized).

Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis Using a Combination of Chevron Osteotomy, Longitudinal K-wire, and K-wire Compression Staples

Among surgical methods for advanced trapeziometacarpal arthrosis, arthrodesis may benefit high-demand patients such as laborers because it preserves the osseous foundation of the thumb. The authors achieved successful trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis in 3 patients by a combination of chevron osteotomy, longitudinal K-wire, and K-wire compression staples without using bone graft. There were no complications specifically associated with the surgery other than asymptomatic slight pull-out of a staple. This combination is a good option for trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis, having the advantages of using a small incision and common devices and being low cost. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e894-e896.].

The use of dynamic radiographs in trapeziometacarpal joint arthrodesis for accurate range of motion evaluation

BACKGROUND

Increased motion at the scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint and compensatory hypermobility of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint contribute to the total abduction and adduction motion of the thumb after trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint arthrodesis. However, there were no detailed studies to evaluate the contribution of motion of each joint towards total thumb mobility.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative study on thumb joint motion in 56 hands who underwent TM joint arthrodesis against that of 56 hands in normal subjects. Dynamic radiographs were performed and the angles subtended by the first (M1) and second (M2) metacarpals were to measure radial abduction and adduction, and volar abduction and adduction. In addition, angles subtended by the thumb proximal phalanx (P1) and M1 in abduction and adduction were measured to evaluate the hypermobility of the MP joint.

RESULTS

The average total arcs of M1M2 motion in normal subjects in radial and volar abduction-adduction planes were 24° and 35° respectively. The arthrodesis group averaged 9° of motion in the radial abduction and adduction plane and 8° in the volar abduction and adduction plane. P1M1 volar adduction angle was significantly larger in the arthrodesis group, suggesting that the arthrodesis group had larger compensatory motion of the MP joint in volar adduction compared to normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings on the amount of hypermobility of MP joint after TM joint arthrodesis are valuable information for optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol. To achieve good range of motion of thumb abduction and adduction following TM joint arthrodesis, emphasis must be placed in obtaining maximum potential motion of STT joint rather than hypermobility of MP joint.

WITHDRAWN: Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb when conservative management, such as splinting, or medical management, such as oral analgesics, is no longer adequate in reducing disability and pain. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal (thumb) osteoarthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following sources up to 08 August 2013: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), CINAHL (1982 to August 2013), Clinicaltrials.gov (to August 2013) and World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Portal (to August 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs where the intervention was surgery for people with thumb osteoarthritis. Outcomes were pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently screened and included studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 670 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (IA), Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and Swanson joint replacement). We did not find any studies that compared surgery with sham surgery or surgery with non-surgical interventions.Most included studies had an unclear risk of most biases which raises doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure (re-operation) or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. One study demonstrated a difference in adverse events (mild-moderate swelling) between Artelon joint replacement and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition. However, the quality of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and imprecision of results.Low quality evidence suggests trapeziectomy with LRTI may not provide additional benefits or result in more adverse events over trapeziectomy alone. Mean pain (three studies, 162 participants) was 26 mm on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (0 is no pain) for trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI reduced pain by a mean of 2.8 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.2) or an absolute reduction of 3% (-10% to 4%). Mean physical function (three studies, 211 participants) was 31.1 points on a 0 to 100 point scale (0 is best physical function, or no disability) with trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in sightly lower function scores (standardised mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.32), an equivalent to a worsening of 0.2 points (95% CI -5.8 to 6.1) on a 0 to 100 point scale (absolute decrease in function 0.03% (-0.83% to 0.88%)). Low quality evidence from four studies (328 participants) indicates that the mean number of adverse events was 10 per 100 participants for trapeziectomy alone, and 19 events per 100 participants for trapeziectomy with LRTI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.73) or an absolute risk increase of 9% (95% CI 0% to 28%). Low quality evidence from one study (42 participants) indicates that the mean scapho-metacarpal distance was 2.3 mm for the trapeziectomy alone group, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in a mean of 0.1 mm less distance (95% CI -0.81 to 0.61). None of the included trials reported global assessment, quality of life, and revision or re-operation rates.Low-quality evidence from two small studies (51 participants) indicated that trapeziectomy with LRTI may not improve function or slow joint degeneration, or produce additional adverse events over trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction.We are uncertain of the benefits or harms of other surgical techniques due to the mostly low quality evidence from single studies and the low reporting rates of key outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with LRTI had additional benefit over arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with IA. There was also insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with IA had any additional benefit over the Artelon joint implant, the Swanson joint replacement or trapeziectomy alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any studies that compared surgery to sham surgery or to non-operative treatments. We were unable to demonstrate that any technique confers a benefit over another technique in terms of pain and physical function. Furthermore, the included studies were not of high enough quality to provide conclusive evidence that the compared techniques provided equivalent outcomes.

Arthrodesis for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the outcomes of trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint arthrodesis for primary osteoarthritis in elderly patients in comparison with a younger cohort.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of outcomes following TMC joint arthrodesis between patients older than 65 years (elderly group) and patients younger than 55 years (younger group). Thirty-eight hands in 29 patients were included in this study. There were 19 hands in 16 elderly patients and 19 hands in 13 younger patients with average ages of 68 and 52 years, respectively. Postoperative follow-ups were 36 and 35 months, respectively. Patient-reported upper extremity disability was assessed using the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Clinical evaluation of impairment measures included measurement of key pinch strength, grip power, range of motion, and Kapandji score.

RESULTS

In both groups, surgery was effective in relieving pain. The DASH score improved at the final follow-up in both groups. Improvements in the DASH score showed similar results in both groups. Preoperative key pinch strength was similar between the 2 groups. Although this improved for both groups, the younger group did have greater improvement. Grip strength also improved in both groups. The younger group had better pre- and postoperative grip strength; however, the extent of improvement was similar between the 2 groups. Postoperative range of motion and Kapandji scores were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of patients older than 65 years following TMC joint arthrodesis and those of patients younger than 55 years were similar except for improvement of key pinch strength. This procedure has a role in the surgical treatment of primary TMC joint osteoarthritis in the elderly as well as in younger patients.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb with plate fixation and bone grafting: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal (CM) joint of the thumb has been recognized as a common technique that gives pain relief, stability, and strength, but it has some disadvantages, such as nonunion, pantrapezial osteoarthritis, and reduced mobility.

METHODS

Thirteen thumbs of 12 patients with CM joint arthritis who underwent CM joint arthrodesis were reviewed retrospectively. The average age of the patients was 61.0 years. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 5 years. Arthrodesis was performed with a T-plate and an autogenous iliac cancellous bone graft for all patients.

RESULTS

All thumbs had radiographic evidence of union, and there was no nonunion. No reduction of motion of the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb was found after surgery. Postoperatively, scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis and metacarpophalangeal arthritis progressed in two joints each. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 39.9 (range 8-69) to 11.1 (range 0-23.1). All patients had no or slight problems of the thumb and no complaints related to the pelvis in daily living and were either very satisfied or satisfied with the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthrodesis of the thumb CM joint with a plate and bone graft achieved satisfactory results in all cases with very few complications. This procedure is a valuable tool in middle-aged and elderly patients with thumb CM joint arthritis.

Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb when conservative management, such as splinting, or medical management, such as oral analgesics, is no longer adequate in reducing disability and pain. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal (thumb) osteoarthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following sources up to 08 August 2013: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), CINAHL (1982 to August 2013), Clinicaltrials.gov (to August 2013) and World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Portal (to August 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs where the intervention was surgery for people with thumb osteoarthritis. Outcomes were pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. We excluded trials that compared non-surgical interventions with surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently screened and included studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 670 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (IA), Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and Swanson joint replacement).Most included studies had an unclear risk of most biases which raises doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure (re-operation) or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. One study demonstrated a difference in adverse events (mild-moderate swelling) between Artelon joint replacement and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition. However, the quality of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and imprecision of results.Low quality evidence suggests trapeziectomy with LRTI may not provide additional benefits or result in more adverse events over trapeziectomy alone. Mean pain (three studies, 162 participants) was 26 mm on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (0 is no pain) for trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI reduced pain by a mean of 2.8 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.2) or an absolute reduction of 3% (-10% to 4%). Mean physical function (three studies, 211 participants) was 31.1 points on a 0 to 100 point scale (0 is best physical function, or no disability) with trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in sightly lower function scores (standardised mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.32), an equivalent to a worsening of 0.2 points (95% CI -5.8 to 6.1) on a 0 to 100 point scale (absolute decrease in function 0.03% (-0.83% to 0.88%)). Low quality evidence from four studies (328 participants) indicates that the mean number of adverse events was 10 per 100 participants for trapeziectomy alone, and 19 events per 100 participants for trapeziectomy with LRTI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.73) or an absolute risk increase of 9% (95% CI 0% to 28%). Low quality evidence from one study (42 participants) indicates that the mean scapho-metacarpal distance was 2.3 mm for the trapeziectomy alone group, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in a mean of 0.1 mm less distance (95% CI -0.81 to 0.61). None of the included trials reported global assessment, quality of life, and revision or re-operation rates.Low-quality evidence from two small studies (51 participants) indicated that trapeziectomy with LRTI may not improve function or slow joint degeneration, or produce additional adverse events over trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction.We are uncertain of the benefits or harms of other surgical techniques due to the mostly low quality evidence from single studies and the low reporting rates of key outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with LRTI had additional benefit over arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with IA. There was also insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with IA had any additional benefit over the Artelon joint implant, the Swanson joint replacement or trapeziectomy alone.We did not find any studies that compared any other combination of the other techniques mentioned above or any other techniques including a sham procedure.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any studies that compared surgery to sham surgery and we excluded studies that compared surgery to non-operative treatments. We were unable to demonstrate that any technique confers a benefit over another technique in terms of pain and physical function. Furthermore, the included studies were not of high enough quality to provide conclusive evidence that the compared techniques provided equivalent outcomes.

Evidence-based medicine: thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Recount the epidemiology of basilar joint arthritis. 2. Understand how the anatomy and kinematics of this joint contribute to the development of the disease process. 3. Combine patient history, clinical examination, and radiographic findings to formulate a diagnosis and staging of the arthritis. 4. Incorporate conservative management into the patient treatment plan to aid in determining a patient's surgical candidacy. 5. Comprehend the basic principles of available surgical options, potential complications, and evidence pertaining to surgical outcome.

SUMMARY

This article has been prepared to accompany practice-based assessment with ongoing surgical education for the Maintenance of Certification for the American Board of Plastic Surgery. It is structured for physicians to comparatively evaluate their care of a patient with arthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint.

Trapeziometacarpal narrow pseudarthrosis: a new surgical technique to treat thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

We describe a technique that arose from the observation of the clinical outcome of failed arthrodeses of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. In these cases a pseudoarthrosis developed which, surprisingly, rarely lead to a poor clinical outcome. Thus we developed a simple technique which deliberately caused the formation of a narrow pseudoarthrosis in the carpometacarpal joint. We present a retrospective review of 248 consecutive patients treated for Eaton stages II and III osteoarthritis. We observed a statistically significant improvement in mean appositional and oppositional pinch strength, mean DASH score (63.8 pre-operatively to 10.5 at final follow-up), and the mean pain score (8.3 to 0.2). We conclude that trapeziometacarpal limited excision arthroplasty is a simple and reliable alternative to existing surgical techniques for treating Stage II or III thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis.

Modified total trapezial and partial trapezoidal excision and ligament reconstruction tendon interposition reduces symptoms in isolated scaphotrapezial-trapezoid arthritis of the wrist

Trapezial excision arthroplasty with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) modified to include proximal trapezoid excision was performed on 12 wrists in 10 patients with symptomatic, isolated scaphotrapezial-trapezoid (STT) arthritis. Wrist range of motion, lateral pinch and grip strength, and analog pain scores were measured pre- and post-operatively. Mean follow-up was 18 (11-42) months. Post-operatively, reported pain scores uniformly decreased (p < 0.0001). Mean range of wrist flexion increased from 48 to 53° (p < 0.05) and extension from 51 to 55° (p < 0.05). There was also an overall increase in mean grip strength from 15.6 to 19.2 kg and pinch strength from 3.5 to 4.3 kg. Modified Mayo Wrist Scores were excellent in six cases, good in three, and fair in one. Our results suggest that modified total trapezial, partial trapezoidal excision and LRTI could be an effective surgical alternative in cases of isolated STT arthritis.

Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005. Surgery has been used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb. However, there is no evidence to suggest that any one surgical procedure is superior to another.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of different surgical techniques in reducing pain and improving physical function, patient global assessment, range of motion and strength in people with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis at 12 months. Additionally, to investigate whether there was any improvement or deterioration in outcomes between the 12-month review and five year follow up.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched:(CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to Dec 2008), CINAHL (1982 to Dec 2008), AMED (1985 to Dec 2008) and EMBASE (1974 to Dec 2008), and performed handsearching of conference proceedings and reference lists from reviews and papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised trials where the intervention was surgery and pain, physical function, patient global assessment, range of motion or strength was measured as an outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse effects. We contacted trial authors for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine studies involving 477 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty, Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and joint replacement). Studies reported results of a mixed group of participants with Stage II-IV osteoarthritis, with a range of improvement for pain and physical function. The majority of studies included in this review had an unclear risk of bias which raises some doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, patient global assessment or range of motion. Of participants who underwent trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, 22% had adverse effects (including scar tenderness, tendon adhesion or rupture, sensory change, or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Type 1)) compared to 10% who underwent trapeziectomy. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition is therefore associated with 12% more adverse effects (RR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.15).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although it appears that no one procedure produces greater benefit in terms of pain and physical function, there was insufficient evidence to be conclusive. Trapeziectomy has fewer complications than trapeziectomy with LRTI.

Long-term outcomes of trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis in the management of trapeziometacarpal arthritis

PURPOSE

Reported outcomes of trapeziometacarpal (TM) arthrodesis have been contradictory. The purpose of this paper is to review the long-term results of TM arthrodesis for arthritis with respect to clinical outcomes, union, development of adjacent joint arthritis, and complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of TM arthrodeses performed between 1970 and 2003 was undertaken. Among a total of 241 arthrodeses performed, 126 thumbs in 114 patients (79 women, 35 men) treated for osteoarthritis were available for follow-up evaluation. Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiographic data were reviewed. The average age was 57 years (range 32-77). The dominant hand was involved in 76 cases. Supplemental bone graft was used in 90 thumbs. Preoperative appositional (key) pinch, oppositional (tip) pinch, and grip strengths were 3.0 kg, 2.7 kg, and 14 kg, respectively. The average pain score on a scale of 0-10 was 6.6 (range 4-10). The average follow-up was 11.2 years (range 3-28 years).

RESULTS

There were 17 nonunions. No correlation existed between the incidence of nonunion and the use of supplemental bone graft. Nine of 17 thumbs had re-operation, including revision arthrodesis (6) and interposition or suspensionplasty (3). The appositional pinch, oppositional pinch, and grip strengths improved to 5.9 kg, 5.4 kg, and 23 kg, respectively (p < .01). The average pain score improved to 0.4 (p < .01). Radiographic progression of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis occurred in 39 cases; however, only 8 of these were symptomatic. Development of metacarpophalangeal arthritis was noted in 16 thumbs; none have been clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

For most patients TM arthrodesis reduces pain, improves function and results in excellent patient satisfaction. Despite the development of metacarpophalangeal and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint arthritis, intervention for these joints was rarely warranted.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Treatment of advanced carpometacarpal joint disease: arthrodesis

Thumb carpometacarpal arthritis is a common condition that may result in debilitating pain and loss of acceptable hand function. If patients continue to be symptomatic after a trial of nonoperative management, many surgical options exist in the treatment of carpometacarpal arthritis. For isolated trapeziometacarpal arthritis, arthrodesis is a viable option to create a pain free, strong, and stable thumb.

Traitement de la rhizarthrose par prothèse métacarpienne de resurfaçage

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study was to present our experience with hemiarthroplasty of the base of the first metacarpal for the treatment of degenerative disease of the trapeziometacarpal joint. We have used this resurfacing implant since 1995 as part of our therapeutic armamentarium together with trapeziectomy, arthrodesis and total arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The chromium-cobalt implant is inserted into the base of the first metacarpal. Three implant sizes are available. The present series included 106 implants in 87 patients, predominantly female. Mean patient age was 59.6 years. Three quarters of the patients had isolated joint degeneration. The preoperative complaint was pain (scored 3 on a 4-point scale) for 92% of patients. Joint motion was generally not impaired. Grip force was limited with less than 50% force for first finger-thumb opposition in three quarters of the patients. The anterior Gedda-Möberg approach was used in all cases. The joint was immobilized for two to three weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were seven complications among the 106 cases: reflex dystrophy (n=4), global pain (n=2) and rupture of the long extensors (n=1). Sixty nine patients (83 implants) were reviewed at more than one year follow-up. Mean follow-up was 53 months (range 23 - 128 months). Activities were resumed at two months for 88% of implants with no problem for grip force for one-third and normal activity for 66%. Patient assessment was: outcome good and very good for 94%, pain free for 52%, and moderate pain without impaired activity for 43% (Kapandji opposition score was normal in 90%). Grip force was decreased in 25%. Radiographically, all implants were stable. Joint centering was improved (from 25% to 60% at last follow-up). There was no correlation between radiographic centering and clinical outcome.

DISCUSSION

This hemiarthroplasty has provided satisfactory results in terms of pain relief, joint motion, and function. There has not been any long-term radiographic problem. If revision is needed for failure, the procedure is simple and trapeziectomy, total arthroplasty or arthrodesis can be performed. The hemi-implant can be inserted after total arthroplasty. Compared with other techniques, this implant avoids the problem of silicone tolerance with the Swanson implant and has provided results superior to those of arthrodesis and trapiezectomy but slightly less satisfactory than with total arthroplasty. The indication for use of this resurfacing implant is osteoarthritis of a centered trapeziometacarpal in the young subject. The implant is contraindicated for advanced-stage disease, stiff joint with retraction of the first commissure and hyperextension of the metacarpophalangeal joint.

Long term results of surgical intervention for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint : comparison of resection arthroplasty, trapeziectomy with tendon interposition and trapezio-metacarpal arthrodesis

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is a common entity, often bilateral and predominantly affecting postmenopausal women. In the case of failure of conservative treatment, surgery is a good option. The aim of this study was to compare three surgical procedures. 63 patients (74 thumbs) with osteoarthritis of the trapezio-metacarpal joint were surgically treated; 54 patients were seen for follow-up, 7 had died and 2 were lost to follow-up. The patients were stratified according to treatment; resection arthroplasty (the joint surface's of the metacarpal and the trapezium are resected) (18 thumbs), trapeziectomy with tendon interposition (17 thumbs) or trapezio-metacarpal arthrodesis (28 thumbs). Baseline characteristics were comparable in the three groups for mean age at operation, Eaton classification, left right distribution and dominant hands operated. The average follow-up was 13 years for the resection group, 8 years for the trapeziectomy group and 9 years for the arthrodesis group. No statistically significant difference between the three groups was found for the visual analogue pain and satisfaction scale, pain frequency nor DASH score. Patients in the trapeziectomy group had significantly less pain compared to the arthrodesis group (p=0.025). Statistically, radial abduction was significantly better after trapeziectomy compared to resection arthroplasty (p<0.01) or arthrodesis (p=0.01). There was no difference among the three groups in grip and tip pinch strength nor in pain on palpation. None of the patients in the trapeziectomy group needed a re-operation, one patient in the resection arthroplasty group had a re-operation, and 22 patients in the arthrodesis group had one or more re-operations for hardware removal or because of a complication. This study shows that the resection arthroplasty has equally good long term results compared to trapeziectomy combined with tendon interposition or arthrodesis. Resection arthroplasty is performed through a single incision and is technically simple. In our clinic resection arthroplasty is therefore the preferred technique for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint.

Interposition arthroplasty using trapezium tendon ball for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb

Carpometacarpal (CM) joint arthroplasty of the thumb using a trapezium tendon ball was performed in 11 hands of 9 patients with osteoarthritis. After a total dissection of the trapezium, the palmaris longus was wrapped around the trapezium, with the surfaces of both the CM joint and the scaphotrapezial joint tightly covered. Grafted trapezium was repositioned, and a congruency of the CM joint was confirmed. All patients were relieved from pain, with the radial abduction angle, grip strength, and the pinch strength increased 5 years after surgery. Radiographically, the mean width of the CM joint space increased, and a central migration of the first metacarpal bone was not found. This procedure would be available for the osteoarthritis in both the CM joint and the scaphotrapezial joint.

Immunohistochemical detection of relaxin binding to the volar oblique ligament

PURPOSE

Excess laxity in the volar oblique ligament may predispose the thumb to trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. A greater prevalence of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis in women suggests a hormonal cause and relaxin is a hormone that may have some involvement. This conclusion emerges from relaxin's diverse tissue tropism, stimulation of collagenase production in cultured fibroblasts, and reports of increased joint laxity during pregnancy. We used immunohistochemistry to assess the potential of the volar oblique ligament to bind relaxin.

METHODS

Eight volar oblique ligaments were obtained intraoperatively from perimenopausal women having basal joint arthroplasty with ligament reconstruction using the flexor carpi radialis tendon. Tissue specimens were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 degrees C until processing. Specimens then were cryosectioned, treated with a chelating rinse, incubated overnight with recombinant human relaxin, fixed, blocked, and exposed to antirelaxin antibody. Treatment with a universal aminoethylcarbizole staining kit was used to visualize areas of ligament-ligand binding. Both tissue and procedural controls served to establish binding specificity.

RESULTS

Abundant staining was observed with the positive control (cervix) and all 8 volar oblique ligaments. Little or no staining was present in fibrocartilage (negative control) or procedural controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Relaxin binds to the volar oblique ligament with specificity, implying a receptor-mediated process. Limitations of the procedure could not confirm binding saturability, necessitating additional study.

Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery has been used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb. However, there is no evidence to suggest that any one surgical procedure is superior to another.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of surgery in reducing pain and improving physical function, patient global assessment, range of motion, and strength in people with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis at 12 months. Additionally, it was the reviewers intention to investigate whether there was any improvement or deterioration in outcomes between the 12 months review and a 5 year follow-up.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the the following databases in the Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 4: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) as well as MEDLINE (1966-Dec 2004), CINAHL (1982-Dec 2004), AMED (1985-Dec 2004), and EMBASE (1974-Dec 2004). Database searches were supplemented by hand searching conference proceedings and reference lists from reviews and papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were: randomised, quasi-randomised or controlled trials; intervention was surgery; and pain, physical function, patient global assessment, range of motion, or strength was measured as an outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers examined the identified studies according to the inclusion criteria. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality and then data, including adverse effects, was extracted and cross-checked. Authors were contacted to provide missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies involving 384 participants were included. Studies of five surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), and joint replacement). All studies reported results of a mixed group of participants with Stage II-IV osteoarthritis, with a range of improvement across all stages of 27 to 57 mm on a 0-100 VAS scale for pain and 18-24 mm on a 0-100 VAS scale for physical function. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, patient global assessment, range of motion or strength. However, participants who underwent trapeziectomy had 16% fewer adverse effects (p=0<.001) than the other commonly-used procedures studied in this review; conversely, those who underwent trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition had 11% more (p=0.03) (including scar tenderness, tendon adhesion or rupture, sensory change, or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Type 1).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No one procedure produced greater strength than any other. Although this also appears to be the case for pain and physical function, there was insufficient evidence to be conclusive. Trapeziectomy is safer and has fewer complications than the other procedures studied in this review, and conversely trapeziectomy with LRTI has more.

Arthrodesis of the trapeziometacarpal joint for basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb: the importance of obtaining osseous union

INTRODUCTION

In the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb, several options are available. The carpometacarpal arthrodesis should provide stability, strength and resolution of pain. There is however some controversy on the outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study we reviewed 34 carpometacarpal joint fusions (26 men, eight women; mean age 48 years). Two techniques of fixation have been used: staples (16x) and K-wires (18x). The follow-up was 5.2 years.

RESULTS

The nonunion rate was 39%. Only 60% of the patients was satisfied. The DASH score was 32 (standard deviation 18). Key pinch force was reduced with 27% of the opposite side. Range of motion was slightly reduced: 6 degrees in the interphalangeal joint, 19 degrees in the metacarpophalangeal joint. When fusion was obtained patients' satisfaction increased to 88%.

CONCLUSION

Patient satisfaction was low and nonunion rate was high. Better results are obtained in cases with osseous union. More solid fixations, perhaps with addition of bone grafts have to be considered.

Results of arthroscopic debridement for isolated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis

PURPOSE

Symptomatic isolated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint arthritis affects approximately 10% of the population. Investigation of the technique of arthroscopic debridement of this joint was done to assess symptom relief achieved and record any resulting postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with persistent symptoms were assessed prospectively by a research nurse. Measurements of range of motion and grip strength were obtained before and after surgery. Visual analogue scores for pain and satisfaction levels also were recorded and any limitation to activities of daily living were noted.

RESULTS

Good or excellent subjective results were achieved in 9 patients at final review at an average of 36 months (12-65 mo) after arthroscopic debridement. One patient graded the result as fair owing to failure to achieve normal range of motion. All patients showed a reduction in visual analogue pain scores, which improved from a mean of 86 to 14 points. The mean Green and O'Brien wrist scores improved from 63 to 91.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic debridement can provide good short-term symptomatic relief for isolated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis with low risk for surgical complications.

Complications of trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis using plate and screw fixation

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the complications associated with plate and screw fixation of thumb trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis and to compare these results with a previous report from our institution using K-wire fixation.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 26 trapeziometacarpal arthrodeses that used plate and screw fixation. The most common diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis and the average follow-up evaluation was 40 months. Nineteen patients were available for a clinical follow-up examination and radiographs. These results were compared with the previously published K-wire fixation group that consisted of 59 arthrodeses with an average follow-up period of 84 months.

RESULTS

There were 2 (8%) painful nonunions. There were 6 (23%) hardware malpositions, most frequently associated with a screw in the trapeziotrapezoid joint. Seven (27%) arthrodeses had a second procedure, most commonly hardware removal. Twenty-one (81%) of the patients were satisfied and reported they would have arthrodesis again. In the K-wire fixation group 4 of 59 (7%) arthrodeses went on to nonunion and 2 of 59 required a secondary procedure; patient satisfaction was high (98%).

CONCLUSIONS

K-wire and plate and screw fixation have comparable union rates. In the plate and screw fixation group, however, the satisfaction rate was lower and a second surgery was more common. We now recommend pin fixation when performing trapeziometacarpal joint arthrodesis.

[Surgery for root arthrosis: retrospective study and search for an algorithm]

Several treatments, conservative or surgical, have been proposed for painful arthritis of the base of the thumb with various outcomes. Swanson trapezium implant, arthrodesis of the trapezio-metacarpal (T.M.) joint and suspension arthroplasty are three of the most used techniques for treatment of this condition. Two hundred patients operated on using one of the three techniques were reviewed for a retrospective study to assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method of treatment and their indications. Patient satisfaction rate is high whatever the technique used. Complete pain relief was obtained more often with the Swanson implant (Alnot 0) but differences between the three methods decrease when patients with pain only for particular strains (Alnot 1) are included. Swanson implants (patient satisfaction Alnot 0 and 1: 85.5%) provide excellent subjective and objective results for patients with light activity of daily living causing little stress to the implant. Complication rate with reoperation is equal to other techniques. Surgical treatment is well come through and recovery is fast and not painful. Suspensioplasty (patient satisfaction Alnot 0 and 1: 78.2%) have a low complication and reoperation rate when the technique is well applied. Patient satisfaction rate is high but duration of recovery is long (strength, nimbleness). T.M. arthrodesis is the only type of surgery providing a good strength identical to the opposite side at the price of a limited decrease of range of motion. In conclusion, we propose the following algorithm: for patients over years of age: Swanson trapezium implant; for young and active patients presenting a radiological stage less than Dell III and an intact Scaphotrapezial joint: T.M. arthrodesis; for other patients: suspensioplasty using the A.P.L.

Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: arthrodesis compared with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition

BACKGROUND

There has been considerable controversy regarding the procedure of choice for treatment of any given stage of osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. This study was designed to directly compare the clinical results of two common surgical procedures for this condition, trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis and trapezial excision with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, in similar patient populations.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 1998, 109 patients (141 thumbs) who were less than sixty years old were treated with one of the two procedures. In a retrospective review, forty-two patients (fifty-eight thumbs) treated with arthrodesis completed an outcome questionnaire and twenty-nine patients (forty-four thumbs) treated with arthrodesis completed the questionnaire and were examined. In the group treated with trapezial excision with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, thirty-nine patients (forty-nine thumbs) completed the questionnaire and thirty patients (thirty-eight thumbs) completed the questionnaire and were examined. The average duration of follow-up was sixty-nine months. The groups were similar with regard to age, gender, hand dominance, and duration of follow-up.

RESULTS

Subjective evaluation of pain, function, and satisfaction demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups, with >90% of patients satisfied following either procedure. Although grip strength did not differ between the groups, the arthrodesis group had significantly stronger lateral pinch (p < 0.001) and chuck pinch (p < 0.01). The group treated with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition had a better range of motion with regard to opposition (p < 0.05) and the ability to flatten the hand (p < 0.0001). There was a higher complication rate in the arthrodesis group, with nonunion of the fusion site accounting for the majority of the complications. However, despite a persistent nonunion in six thumbs, those thumbs and the thumbs in which union was obtained did not differ with regard to pain; all of the patients with nonunion had improvement in their pain status compared with preoperatively, and all were very satisfied with the outcome. Peritrapezial arthritis developed in nine patients (fourteen thumbs). This finding was not related to age and did not affect overall pain, function, or satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Although traditionally arthrodesis and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition have been indicated in two different patient populations, we compared them in a homogeneous group and found that the two procedures had similar results with regard to pain, function, and satisfaction despite minimal differences in strength and motion. Although complications were more frequent following arthrodesis, most did not affect the overall outcome.

Tendon interposition arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a retrospective comparative follow-up study

Long-term subjective and objective outcomes of 24 tendon interposition arthroplasties in 17 patients and 32 trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrodeses in 26 patients were compared retrospectively in a standardized manner. Tendon interposition arthroplasty led to complications less often (27%) than TMC arthrodesis (39%). Patients in the tendon interposition arthroplasty group reported significantly less pain, less temperature intolerance, and better thumb mobility and were more satisfied with pain symptoms than patients in the arthrodesis group. Patients undergoing tendon interposition arthroplasty had better thumb opposition, interphalangeal joint mobility, and radial and palmar TMC joint range of motion. No statistically significant differences were found in tip pinch, key pinch, and grip strength between the 2 groups. Proximal first metacarpal collapse occurred in the tendon interposition patients without affecting subjective or objective outcome. Seven of 25 patients with TMC arthrodesis had pseudarthrosis. Tendon interposition arthroplasty seems to be preferable to TMC joint arthrodesis for the treatment of TMC arthritis.

[Rubis 2 trapezometacarpal prosthesis: concept, operative technique]

INTRODUCTION

We have implanted 49 uncemented reversed trapeziometacarpal prostheses since 1997.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

We used a classical dorsal approach. A good preparation of the base of the first metacarpal will give excellent exposure of the trapezium, the most important stage of the operation. Instrumentation allows easy insertion of the two components and also their adjustment.

RESULTS

A follow-up of three years is too short and we intend to give our full results at five years. At the present time the patients are well and seem satisfied.

DISCUSSION

The reversed design of this prosthesis is useful because it spares the scarce bone stock of the trapezium. The shape of the trapezial implant prevents not only its sinkage but also any lateral movement.

Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis in primary osteoarthritis: a minimum two-year follow-up study

We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent 59 trapeziometacarpal (TM) arthrodeses to assess the efficacy of this procedure with respect to patient satisfaction and radiographic evidence of peritrapezial arthritis. The average patient age was 54 years (range, 41-73 years) and the average follow-up period was 7 years (range, 2-20 years). All TM arthrodeses used K-wires; 61 had a supplemental distal radius bone graft. There were 10 bilateral arthrodeses. There were 4 (7%) nonunions. Three nonunions were painless and 1 was painful. There were 2 patients who required a second procedure; 1 had a painful nonunion that was successfully treated with a repeat arthrodesis and the other had a solid but painful thumb that was treated with trapezial excision and soft tissue interposition. The average pain score at the time of the follow-up examination was 1.5 of 10. Thirty-three patients had postoperative radiographs; 7 had radiographic evidence of peritrapezial arthritis. Based on our findings we believe that isolated, symptomatic TM osteoarthritis in patients older than 40 years old is an indication of TM arthrodesis.

Weilby-Burton arthroplasty of the trapeziometacarpal joint of the thumb

Twenty-three patients (25 thumbs) were treated by tendon interposition arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal arthrosis as described by Weilby and modified slightly as described by Burton and Pellegrini. There was good (4/25, 16%) or complete (19/25, 76%) pain relief in 23 (92%) of the cases. Activities of daily living were generally easier. Mobility and strength of the thumb were satisfactory. One patient had signs of instability during a stress test. We conclude that our technique produces a stable and pain-free thumb joint. However, careful selection of the patients for this procedure is essential, and the patient must be given comprehensive information about all stages.

[A retrospective study of 69 primary rhizarthrosis surgically treated by total trapeziectomy followed in 34 cases by interpositional tendinoplasty and in 35 cases by suspensioplasty]

INTRODUCTION

We compare retrospectively two groups of total trapezectomy did as treatment for primary osteoarthritis of trapeziometacarpal joint combined in 34 cases with tendon interposition arthroplasty (group A) and in 35 cases with suspensioplasty (group B).

METHOD

In group A an 'anchovy' was made with half band of the abductor pollicis longus tendon and the palmarus longus tendon; in group B the same tendon samples were rolled around the flexor capi radialis tendon. The follow up is at least 18 months.

RESULTS

Strength was nearly the same in the two groups. The suspensioplasty of the group B allows a better stability after trapezectomy than the anchovy of the group A, but with a small decrease in range of motion, without functional consequence. In both groups of patients, the range of motion was good. In the group B, the persistent pain was more frequent than in group A. Patients were satisfied with the ability of perform activities of daily life, but working patients were bothered by poor endurance. There was no statistical correlation between the power of the thumb and thumb shortening, but there was one between increasing of hyperextension of thumb metacarpophalangeal joint and decreasing power of pinch.

DISCUSSION

Since the suspensioplasty has been tightenedless, the relief of pain has been better in the group B. Overall, the results in the two groups were nearly the same; the two procedures studied are satisfactory in most cases, but their result is too often inadequate with performance at work.

Soft Tissue Complications Following Kirschner Wire Fixation for Fusion of Basal Joint Arthritis

Basal joint arthritis is a common hand condition presenting with pain and swelling, often requiring surgical treatment in the late stages. Surgical options include arthrodesis, excision arthroplasty, implant arthroplasty and ligament reconstruction, and tendon interposition arthroplasty. A patient with bilateral basal joint arthritis underwent K-wire arthrodesis of the left basal joint. Subsequently, she developed complications due to impingement of the K-wire on the median nerve, superficial radial nerve, and flexor tendons of the index finger. The diagnosis was made three years post-operatively and she then underwent reconstructive surgery. Eventually she recovered with good movement and sensation of the affected digits. Although K-wire arthrodesis of basal joint is a simple and effective procedure used primarily in treatment of arthritis, this case highlights the importance of appreciating surgical anatomy and post-operative clinical features and investigations.

A patient-reported comparison of trapeziectomy with Swanson Silastic implant or sling ligament reconstruction

A retrospective review of two types of operations for carpometacarpal osteoarthritis of the thumb was done for patients operated on between 1991 and 1996. Follow-up ranged from 18 to 90 months (mean 62 months). Fifty-eight Swanson Silastic arthroplasties and 56 sling excision arthoplasties were reviewed. Eight patients with Swanson arthroplasties underwent removal of the implant. Eight patients in the sling excision group required further surgery. These patients were excluded from further analysis. Questionnaires about pain, general satisfaction and function were sent to the other patients and 87 responses were received (sling 45, implant 42). In the implant group significantly better results were obtained for pain at 1 year, carrying a milk bottle and taking a handbrake off a car, and overall function. We conclude that trapeziectomy combined with Swanson implant gives better results in the short term if there are no complications of the operation.

Trapeziometacarpal joint arthrodesis for osteoarthritis. Results of power staple fixation

Fifty-two cases of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis were treated with arthrodesis using small staple fixation. Eighty-five per cent of the patients were free of pain, with normal thumb. Opposition to the fourth finger tip was always possible and opposition to the little finger tip was observed in 94% of cases. Four patients (7.6%) developed a non-union but only two complained of pain. Arthrodesis with power staple fixation minimizes bone resection and postoperative immobilization (mean 28 days) because of the good stability following this procedure.

Results of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid fusion for isolated idiopathic arthritis

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint fusion was carried out for pain relief in eight patients with isolated arthritis. Seven patients had satisfactory relief of symptoms. The subjective results were excellent in five, good in two and bad in one patient, who had non-union of the arthrodesis and was also the only patient to develop trapeziometacarpal arthritis. Average grip strength was 0.8 and lateral pinch strength was 0.7 of that in the other hand. There was a very small relative difference in dexterity. There was an average difference of 9 degrees of flexion-extension and 13 degrees of radio-ulnar deviation. It is concluded that for isolated idiopathic STT arthritis, fusion gives very satisfactory results with minimal complications.