Ignatius A, Peraus M, Schorlemmer S, Augat P, Burger W, Leyen S, Claes L. Osseointegration of alumina with a bioactive coating under load-bearing and unloaded conditions.
Biomaterials 2005;
26:2325-32. [PMID:
15585235 DOI:
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.029]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2004] [Accepted: 07/19/2004] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the osseointegration of Al(2)O(3) coated with a bioactive glass ceramic (BioveritI), in a load-bearing implant model in sheep in comparison to uncoated Al(2)O(3) and to a minimally loaded situation. Both types of implants were inserted into the proximal tibia (load-bearing model) and in a drill hole defect into the tibia diaphysis (minimally loaded model). Under load-bearing conditions, the coating resulted in significantly higher interfacial shear strength and a high amount of mineralized bone in direct contact to the implant surface. In contrast, the uncoated Al(2)O(3) was surrounded by a thick connective tissue layer corresponding to low interfacial shear strength. In the minimally loaded model, however, there was rather a tendency of lower interfacial shear strength in the case of the coated implants. This finding corresponds to the histological results, which showed mineralized bone in the interface of uncoated Al(2)O(3), whereas in the case of the coated implants a thin layer of osteoid was observed. It was suggested that the osseointegration of Al(2)O(3) could be improved by the coating under load-bearing conditions, under which uncoated Al(2)O(3) ceramics cannot directly bind to bone.
Collapse