Aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs in the prophylaxis of thrombosis

Antiplatelet therapy

The major clinical indication for antiplatelet therapy has been the prevention of arterial thrombosis. Arterial thrombi are composed of predominantly platelets formed under conditions of elevated shear stress at sites of atherosclerotic vascular injury and disturbed blood flow. Aspirin, the prototype antiplatelet agent, has been in clinical use as an antithrombotic for almost a half century. However, clinical trials have exposed the limitations of aspirin, and there has been considerable recent progress in the development of more effective antiplatelet agents. These newer agents are rationally based on interrupting specific sites in the sequence of platelet activation. Inhibitors of the initial step of platelet adhesion remain experimental. Inhibitors of specific platelet agonist-receptor interactions include antithrombins, thromboxane A2 receptor antagonists, and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor blockers including ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Inhibitors of arachidonic acid metabolism and thromboxane A2 include omega-3 fatty acids, aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs that inhibit cyclooxygenase, and thromboxane synthase inhibitors. The clinical efficacy of many of these agents may be limited by their actions, which are restricted to single, specific platelet receptors or metabolic pathways. Global interruption of the final step of platelet aggregation can be achieved with monoclonal antibodies and RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) analogs that block ligand binding to the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex. Initial clinical trials with these novel agents have demonstrated superior efficacy in preventing reocclusion and restenosis following coronary angioplasty and atherectomy.

Effect of milrinone in human platelet shape change, aggregation and thromboxane A2 synthesis: an in vitro study

Milrinone (MIL; a cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase type-III inhibitor), added in vitro to achieve concentrations below the therapeutic levels, inhibited agonist-induced platelet shape change (PSC). Arachidonic acid (AA)-induced PSC was significantly more inhibited by a combination of MIL and indomethacin (INDO; a cyclooxygenase inhibitor) than by either alone. PSC induced by 5-hydroxytryptamine was inhibited by MIL but not by INDO; and this effect of MIL was not augmented by INDO. Whole blood-platelet aggregation (WB-PA) and platelet-rich plasma aggregation induced by potent stimulators of thromboxane A2 (TXA2) synthesis such as AA and calcium ionophore and by less potent agonists (e.g. ADP and U46619) were inhibited by MIL at or near therapeutic concentrations. WB-PA induced by collagen was significantly more inhibited by the MIL and INDO combination than by either of these agents alone whereas with ADP-induced WB-PA no additional effect could be shown when both MIL and INDO were co-incubated. MIL and similar types of drugs may be of benefit in conditions associated with platelet hyperactivity and some of these effects may be enhanced by cyclooxygenase inhibitors.

When do vascular surgeons prescribe antiplatelet therapy? Current attitudes

A large number of studies have addressed the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in the prevention of primary and secondary atherosclerotic events. We have undertaken to review the literature and conclude that there is good evidence for the routine prescription of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of secondary atherosclerotic events in patients with unstable angina, myocardial infarction, transient ischaemic attacks and post-arterial reconstruction. The evidence for any benefit in the prevention of vascular graft occlusion is less clear cut. We therefore conducted a postal survey of Vascular Surgeons in Britain and Ireland, receiving 112 responses to 134 questionnaires. Forty-seven percent of surgeons used antiplatelet therapy following any vascular procedure that they undertook. The rest were more selective in their use of these drugs, reserving them for specific vascular reconstruction, e.g. with synthetic grafts. Five percent of surgeons used anti-platelet aggregating prophylaxis only in patients following transluminal balloon angioplasty. In view of extensive evidence of reduction in long-term vascular mortality and non-fatal vascular events by the use of these drugs in patients who have had a primary vascular event, we would suggest that there is a strong argument for the routine use of anti-platelet drugs in patients presenting with arterial disease to a Vascular Surgeon, regardless of vascular reconstruction, angioplasty or type of graft used.