Quantitative assessment of a human carcinogenic potency for propylene oxide

Genotoxic effects of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and epichlorohydrin in humans: update review (1990-2001)

Ethylene oxide (EtO), propylene oxide (PO) and epichlorohydrin (ECH) are important industrial chemicals widely used as intermediates for various synthetic products. EtO and PO are also environmental pollutants. In this review we summarize data published during the period 1990-2001 concerning both the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of these epoxides in humans. The use of DNA and hemoglobin adducts as biomarkers of exposure and the role of polymorphism, as well as confounding factors, are discussed. We have also included recent in vitro data comprising genotoxic effects induced by EtO, PO and ECH in mammalian cells. The uncertainties regarding cancer risk estimation still persist, in spite of the large database collected.

DNA damage induced by gamma-radiation in combination with ethylene oxide or propylene oxide in human fibroblasts

To estimate the effects of interaction of gamma-rays and an epoxide, cell survival and induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) following combined exposure to ionizing radiation and ethylene oxide (EtO) or propylene oxide (PO) were studied in human fibroblasts. Two treatment protocols were applied: (a) the cells were pre-exposed to different doses of gamma-rays and then treated with epoxide, and (b) the cells were pretreated with epoxide and then exposed to different doses of gamma-rays. Here we show that order of the treatment did not play a role in cell survival and that the effect of combined exposure on cell killing was additive for both epoxides. As to DNA DSBs induction, however, a difference dependent upon the order of the treatment was observed. While EtO or PO treatment followed by gamma-rays exposure led to an increased number of DSBs at higher gamma-ray doses (2-3 Gy), no significant increase of DSBs was detected after the opposite order of the treatment (gamma-ray exposure followed by EtO or PO treatment).

32P-postlabelling of propylene oxide 1- and N(6)-substituted adenine and 3-substituted cytosine/uracil: formation and persistence in vitro and in vivo

Propylene oxide, a widely used monofunctional alkylating agent, has been shown to be genotoxic in in vitro test systems and induces tumors in the nasal tissues of experimental animals. Propylene oxide, like related alkylating agents, forms several different adducts with DNA bases, but predominantly at the 7-position of guanine. We have previously described the in vitro and in vivo formation and stability of this major adduct. The aim of the present study was to perform a similar investigation of other adducts of propylene oxide. 1-(2-Hydroxypropyl)adenine (1-HP-adenine) and 3-(2-hydroxypropyl)cytosine (3-HP-cytosine), as well as their rearrangement products to N(6)-(2-hydroxypropyl)adenine (N(6)-HP-adenine) and 3-(2-hydroxypropyl)uracil (3-HP-uracil), respectively, were analysed by a very sensitive (32)P-postlabelling method involving nuclease P1 enhancement and radioisotope detector-coupled HPLC separation. All four adducts could be detected in DNA treated in vitro with propylene oxide. The sum of the levels of 1- and N(6)-HP-adenine amounted to 3.5% and the sum of 3-HP-cytosine and 3-HP-uracil to 1.7%, respectively, of 7-(2-hydroxypropyl)guanine (7-HP-guanine). In male Fischer 344 rats exposed to 500 p.p.m. propylene oxide by inhalation for 20 days, 1-HP-adenine was detected in all analysed tissues, including nasal epithelium, lung and lymphocytes, whereas N(6)-HP-adenine was only found in the tissues of the nasal cavities. The highest level of 1-HP-adenine (2.0 mol/10(6) mol of normal nucleotides, i.e. 2% of 7-HP-guanine) was found in the respiratory nasal epithelium, which also represents the major target for tumour induction in the rat following inhalation of propylene oxide. The levels of this adduct in the lung and in the lymphocytes were considerably lower, amounting to 15 and 9%, respectively, of that of the respiratory nasal epithelium. In rats killed 3 days after cessation of exposure, practically no decrease in 1-HP-adenine was observed, indicating no or very slow repair. 3-HP-uracil could only be detected in the respiratory nasal epithelia of propylene-exposed rats and its concentration was as low as 0.02 mol/10(6) mol of normal nucleotides (0.02% of 7-HP-guanine). Since 3-HP-uracil was chemically much more stable than the latter, the obtained animal data suggest repair of the cytosine and/or uracil adducts. Incubation of propylene oxide-reacted DNA with a protein extract from mammalian cells indicated that an enzymatic repair mechanism exists for removal of 3-HP-cytosine, but not for 3-HP-uracil or 1- and N(6)-HP-adenine. Another finding was that uracil glycosylase is probably not involved. The level of 1-HP-adenine in the propylene oxide-exposed rats was approximately 50 times lower than that of 7-HP-guanine. Nevertheless, this adduct is conveniently analysed and has high chemical stability and recovery, which results in high sensitivity (detection limit 0.3 mol/10(9) mol of normal nucleotides using 10 microgram DNA). 1-HP-adenine might, therefore, be considered as an alternative to 7-HP-guanine for monitoring exposure to propylene oxide.

Tissue distribution of DNA adducts in male Fischer rats exposed to 500 ppm of propylene oxide: quantitative analysis of 7-(2-hydroxypropyl)guanine by 32P-postlabelling

7-(2-Hydroxypropyl)guanine (7-HPG) constitutes the major adduct from alkylation of DNA by the genotoxic carcinogen, propylene oxide. The levels of 7-HPG in DNA of various organs provides a relevant measure of tissue dose. 7-Alkylguanines can induce mutation through abasic sites formed from spontaneous depurination of the adduct. In the current study the formation of 7-HPG was investigated in male Fisher 344 rats exposed to 500 ppm of propylene oxide by inhalation for 6 h/day, 5 days/week, for up to 20 days. 7-HPG was analyzed using the 32P-postlabelling assay with anion-exchange cartridges for adduct enrichment. In animals sacrificed directly following 20 days of exposure, the adduct level was highest in the respiratory nasal epithelium (98.1 adducts per 10(6) nucleotides), followed by olfactory nasal epithelium (58.5), lung (16.3), lymphocytes (9.92), spleen (9.26), liver (4.64), and testis (2.95). The nasal cavity is the major target for tumor induction in the rat following inhalation. This finding is consistent with the major difference in adduct levels observed in nasal epithelium compared to other tissues. In rats sacrificed 3 days after cessation of exposure, the levels of 7-HPG in the aforementioned tissues had, on the average, decreased by about one-quarter of their initial concentrations. This degree of loss closely corresponds to the spontaneous rate of depurination for this adduct (t 1/2 = 120 h), and suggests a low efficiency of repair for 7-HPG in the rat. The postlabelling assay used had a detection limit of one to two adducts per 10(8) nucleotides, i.e. it is likely that this adduct could be analyzed in nasal tissues of rats exposed to less than 1 ppm of propylene oxide.

Propylene oxide mutagenesis at template cytosine residues

Propylene oxide (PO) is a widely used industrial reagent which is mutagenic and carcinogenic. We have recently shown that a variety of aliphatic epoxides, including propylene oxide, can react with DNA to form hydroxyalkyl adducts at N-3 of cytosine which rapidly undergo hydrolytic deamination to produce uracil adducts. These 3-hydroxyalkyl uracil adducts are stable in DNA and are postulated to be an important class of potentially mutagenic lesions. Mutagenesis at cytosine residues due to PO modification of single-stranded M13mp2/C141 DNA was studied by transfection of modified DNA into SOS and non-SOS induced E. coli host cells. Mutations of the proline (CCC) codon at C141 which result in reversion of the lacZ phenotype (blue plaques) were scored. It was found that PO treatment of single-stranded DNA results in dose-dependent mutagenesis that is highly SOS dependent. The spectrum of base-substitution mutations found at this site differed when PO-modified DNA was transfected into E. coli with different DNA repair backgrounds. These results indicate that propylene oxide induced DNA adducts at template cytosine residues are mutagenic in E. coli and that this mutagenesis is greatly increased by SOS processing. They also show that these lesions may be repaired by one or more mechanisms.