Serum prolactin levels in women with breast cancer and their relationship to survival

Clinical Efficacy of the Aromatase Inhibitor Anastrozole in Relation to Prolactin Secretion in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer

Aims and background

It is known that the aromatase inhibitors may act by decreasing estrogen levels. Moreover, it is known that estrogens may stimulate the release of prolactin (PRL), which is a growth factor for breast cancer. This phase II study was performed to evaluate the effects of the novel aromatase inhibitor anastrozole on PRL secretion in metastatic breast cancer and the possible influence of PRL pretreatment levels on the efficacy of therapy.

Methods

The study involved 14 pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients with a poor clinical status. Anastrozole was given orally once a day at 1 mg/day for at least 2 months. To evaluate PRL secretion, venous blood samples were collected before treatment and at 1-monthly intervals during treatment.

Results

The clinical response consisted of partial response (PR) in 2, stable disease (SD) in 5 and progressive disease (PD) in the remaining 7 patients. Abnormally high pretreatment levels of PRL were seen in 5/14 (36%) patients. Progressing patients showed significantly higher pretreatment levels of PRL than those who achieved PR or SD. None of the patients with high PRL pretreatment levels showed a decline in PRL levels on treatment with anastrozole.

Conclusions

This preliminary study suggests that anastrozole has no inhibitory effect on PRL secretion in metastatic breast cancer and that the evidence of abnormally elevated concentrations of PRL prior to therapy is generally associated with a lack of efficacy.

The Favorable Prognostic Significance of Surgery-Induced Hyperprolactinemia in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: Ten-Year Disease-Free Survival Results

It has been shown that each manipulation of the mammary region, including breast surgery, may stimulate prolactin secretion. However, it has also been observed that in more than 50% of breast cancer patients surgical removal of the tumor is not followed by enhanced prolactin secretion. This might be indicative of an altered psychoneuroendocrine control of the mammary gland, which could lead to the onset of more biologically aggressive breast cancer. In fact, surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia has been proven to be associated with a better prognosis in terms of survival in node-negative breast cancer patients. The present study was performed to investigate the impact of postoperative hyperprolactinemia on the disease-free survival (DFS) of breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement. The study included 100 consecutive node-positive breast cancer patients who were followed for at least 10 years. Surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia occurred in 45/100 (45%) patients without any significant correlation with the main prognostic variables including number of involved nodes and ER status. The two groups of patients received the same adjuvant therapies. After a median follow-up of 151 months, the recurrence rate in patients with surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia was significantly lower than in patients with no postoperative hyperprolactinemia (23/45 vs 43/55, p<0.01). Moreover, DFS was significantly longer in hyperprolactinemic patients than in patients who had no enhanced secretion of prolactin postoperatively. In agreement with the results described previously in node-negative breast cancer, our study demonstrates the favorable prognostic significance of surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia in terms of DFS duration also in breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement, independent of the other well-known prognostic variables, thereby confirming that the psychoneuroendocrine status of cancer patients may influence the prognosis of their disease.

Bone metastasis risk factors in breast cancer

Bone is the single most frequent site for bone metastasis in breast cancer patients. Patients with bone-only metastasis have a fairly good prognosis when compared with patients with visceral disease. Nevertheless, cancer-induced bone disease carries an important risk of developing skeletal related events that impact quality of life (QoL). It is therefore particularly important to stratify patients according to their risk of developing bone metastasis. In this context, several risk factors have been studied, including demographic, clinicopathological, genetic, and metabolic factors. Most of them show conflicting or non-definitive associations and are not validated for clinical use. Nonetheless, tumour intrinsic subtype is widely accepted as a major risk factor for bone metastasis development and luminal breast cancer carries an increased risk for bone disease. Other factors such as gene signatures, expression of specific cytokines (such as bone sialoprotein and bone morphogenetic protein 7) or components of the extracellular matrix (like bone crosslinked C-telopeptide) might also influence the development of bone metastasis. Knowledge of risk factors related with bone disease is of paramount importance as it might be a prediction tool for triggering the use of targeted agents and allow for better patient selection for future clinical trials.

The Role of Prolactin in Bone Metastasis and Breast Cancer Cell-Mediated Osteoclast Differentiation

BACKGROUND

Metastasis to the bone is a deleterious aspect of breast cancer and is a preferred site that results in bone loss. Hormones such as prolactin (PRL) have not yet been studied for their role in modulating the secondary tumor bone microenvironment.

METHODS

We used quantitative immunohistochemistry with 134 samples of human primary breast cancer and 17 matched primary breast cancers and bone metastases. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was fitted to evaluate the associations between high prolactin receptor (PRLR) expression and time to bone metastasis, adjusting for estrogen receptor status, lymph node status, and chemotherapy status. We assessed osteoclast differentiation, osteoclast size, and measured pit formation in dentine slices. Statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

High PRLR expression in the primary breast tumor was associated with a shorter time to metastasis that includes bone (PRLRAQUA Max-per 100 unit hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.00 to 1.07, P = .03). We observed the PRLR in rare samples of bone metastases and matched primary breast cancer. PRL treatment of breast cancer cells induced osteoclast differentiation and bone lysis via secreted factors and was abrogated by a PRLR antagonist (delta1-9-G129R-hPRL). We demonstrated that sonic hedgehog is a PRL-regulated cytokine in breast cancer cells and part of the mechanism that induces osteoclast differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our evidence indicates that PRL-PRLR can escalate the impact of breast cancer on bone metastasis and that the presence of the PRLR in the tumor microenvironment of breast cancer bone metastasis has the potential to modulate the microenvironment to induce lytic osteoclast formation.

Breast carcinomas with hyperprolactinemia at the time of diagnosis-clinico-biological association

AIM

To analyse association between preoperative hyperprolactinemia serum levels and clinical and biological features of breast tumors.

METHODS

Serum levels of prolactin were measured in 253 women with invasive breast cancer. Clinical and biological parameters analysed were age, size, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis and immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor, bcl-2, p53 and Ki67.

RESULTS

In ductal carcinomas hyperprolactinemia were associated with high age (p = 0.017), and with bcl-2 + + + expression (p = 0.017). Furthermore, serum prolactin values were significantly higher in bcl-2 +++ cases vs negative (p = 0.029); the same happened when we considered the positivity threshold of 25 ng/mL (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Is possible to detect in 6% of infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas hyperprolactinemia (>25 ng/mL), being associated only with increasing age, but not with other clinical or biological factors; and 2) the most surprising data was the association between prolactinemia (qualitative (>25 ng/mL) and quantitative) and intense bcl-2 tissue expression, which suggests that, probably, this (prolactinemia) is not a sign of worse prognosis and evolution.

Hypothesis: prolactin is tumorigenic to human breast: dispelling the myth that prolactin-induced mammary tumors are rodent-specific

The commonly held assumption that rodent mammary tumors resulting from elevated prolactin are species-specific, or not biologically relevant to humans, is incorrect. Substantial epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence now exists confirming the role of prolactin in human breast cancer. This evidence is evaluated and the argument presented that the tumorigenic risk from prolactin is therefore not species-specific to rodents but directly applies to humans. Further, as the mechanisms of prolactin-induced mammary tumor promotion and development appear analogous between rodents and humans, mammary tumorigenic findings in rodent carcinogenicity bioassays are both predictive and biologically relevant to the human response. Toxicologists and regulators need to consider this in carcinogenicity risk assessments.

Motherhood after breast cancer: searching for la dolce vita

Advances in the field of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer have led to significant improvements in breast cancer survival. This has resulted in a progressive decline in breast cancer-related mortality, such that in 2010 there were estimated to be 400,000 breast cancer survivors under the age of 40 in the USA. Hence, enquiry into the feasibility of fertility preservation, subsequent pregnancy and breastfeeding is increasingly encountered. Fertility counseling remains suboptimal in breast cancer clinics, and there is a wide perception that pregnancy could worsen the prognosis of young breast cancer survivors, despite the lack of evidence supporting this notion. In addition, fertility preservation by means of embryo or oocyte cryopreservation requires ovarian stimulation, which is associated with a significant rise in estradiol levels and might delay initiation of therapy. All these factors, and others, have influenced the quality of fertility counseling offered to young breast cancer patients. In this article, we will critically analyze the available clinical and biological evidence on the safety and feasibility of pregnancy and breastfeeding following breast cancer. In addition, we will discuss the different fertility-preservation techniques available for these patients.

Breastfeeding in breast cancer survivors: pattern, behaviour and effect on breast cancer outcome

Little is known regarding the safety and feasibility of breastfeeding in women with a history of breast cancer. We have performed a survey among breast cancer patients who completed their pregnancy following breast cancer management to examine their lactation behaviours and its effect on breast cancer outcome. Out of 32 women identified, 20 were reachable and accepted to take the questionnaire. Ten women initiated breastfeeding, 4 stopped within one month and 6 had long-term success with a median period of 11 months (7-17 months). The latter were all previously subjected to breast conserving surgery and received qualified lactation counselling at delivery. The main reasons for not initiating breastfeeding were "uncertainty regarding maternal safety" and "a priori unfeasibility" expressed either by the obstetrician or by the oncologist. At a median follow-up of 48 months following delivery, all 20 women were alive with two relapses; one in each group (i.e., lactating and non-lactating). This analysis adds to the limited available evidence on the feasibility and safety of breastfeeding in breast cancer survivors. Proper fertility and survivorship counselling is crucial and requires more attention in breast cancer clinics.

Pregnancy and lactation after breast cancer elevate plasma prolactin, do not shorten and may prolong survival

The affliction of breast cancer is doubled for young patients wishing to have a child. Because estrogens can cause breast cancer and its elevation during pregnancy, clinical advice historically restricted pregnancy to at least 5 years post-diagnosis. Opposing evidence gradually relaxed this. Furthermore, in the last decade it was clarified that overall, post-treatment pregnancy and breast-feeding do not shorten survival. Despite this evidence and patients such as S.B. (deceased) and remarkable L.H. (five children, starting immediately after treatment for node-positive breast cancer), much opposition and restrictive advice remain: additional therapy preferred over pregnancy. In healthy women, pregnancy reduces (cause unknown) the risk of breast cancer and lactation may reduce it. These are accompanied by highly elevated plasma prolactin (PRL) over many months (pregnancy, 15-25 x daily mean 10 ng/ml; lactation, up to 30 x daily mean). PRL concentration too increases in other natural and non-biological conditions, also apparently without increasing breast cancer incidence. Nevertheless, firm and implied support for early pregnancy (and lactation) post-diagnosis and treatment may face a new issue. Over a decade, some studies have claimed epidemiological evidence that a relatively minute PRL elevation (from zero to 0.6-0.8 ng/ml) over mean level increases the risk of breast cancer (i.e. it is a carcinogen) and that this supports (and is supported by) a similar view from some laboratory research. This two-pronged mutuality could create further anxiety and unjustified advice dashing the wish for a child. Is this justified? Epidemiology on PRL and breast cancer risk in the eighties/nineties was contradictory and inconclusive; in the last decade, it was also biologically implausible. 'Positive' laboratory results targeting a 'tamoxifen for PRL' have over-shadowed confounding, negative (often called 'inconsistent') laboratory evidence. Increasingly evident complexity of conflicting biochemical, hormonal, cellular and tissue interactions, confused further by failure of molecular genetics to confirm PRL as a carcinogen, make this target more a mirage than an oasis. While recognizing the value of laboratory research primarily for facts, future progress will be most sound and rapid from observation starting with the human entity, not with its parts. Molecular genetics makes this possible and will be the epicentre of breast cancer research. Meanwhile, young breast cancer patients after initial treatment and eager for a child can today reasonably benefit from advice based on phenomena evolved over eons: pregnancy, lactation and accompanying highly-elevated PRL will not increase risk of recurrence and will in some cases prolong survival.

Salivary steroid assays – research or routine?

Salivary concentrations of unconjugated steroids reflect those for free steroids in serum although concentrations may differ because of salivary gland metabolism. Samples for salivary steroid analysis are stable for up to 7 days at room temperature, one month or more at 4°C and three months or more at −20°C. When assessed against strict criteria, the evidence shows that salivary cortisol in evening samples or following dexamethasone suppression provides a reliable and effective screen for Cushing's syndrome. Sequential salivary cortisol measurements are also extremely helpful for the investigation of suspected cyclical Cushing's syndrome. There is potential for the identification of adrenal insufficiency when used with Synacthen stimulation. Salivary 17-hydroxyprogesterone and androstenedione assays are valued as non-invasive tests for the home-monitoring of hydrocortisone replacement therapy in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. The diagnostic value of salivary oestradiol, progesterone, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and aldosterone testing is compromised by rapid fluctuations in salivary concentrations of these steroids. Multiple samples are required to obtain reliable information, and at present the introduction of these assays into routine laboratory testing is not justified.

Breast-feeding after breast cancer: if you wish, madam

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor-affecting women during the child bearing period. With the rising trend in delaying pregnancy later in life, the issue of subsequent pregnancy and lactation following breast cancer diagnosis has been more frequently encountered. In this context, data is scarce particularly those addressing the issue of lactation. In this review, we discussed different endocrinal, clinical and biological aspects dealing with breast-feeding after breast cancer in an attempt to determine how safe and feasible this approach is.

Prolactin and breast cancer etiology: an epidemiologic perspective

A number of epidemiologic studies of prolactin and breast cancer etiology have recently become available. Retrospective case-control studies have suggested a modest positive or null relationship between circulating prolactin concentrations and risk of breast cancer. However these studies are limited by small sample sizes and the collection of blood after case diagnosis. Several large prospective studies, in which blood was collected prior to diagnosis, have observed modest positive associations between prolactin and risk. In a pooled analysis of approximately 80% of the world's prospective data, the relative risk (RR) comparing women in the top vs bottom quartile of prolactin levels was 1.3 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 1.6, p-trend = 0.002). The results were similar for premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Most notably, high prolactin levels were associated with a 60% increased risk of estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors, but not with ER negative tumors. Limited genetic data suggest a role of polymorphisms in the prolactin and prolactin receptor genes in risk of breast cancer. Studies of survival have suggested that high pretreatment prolactin levels were associated with treatment failure, earlier recurrence, and worse overall survival. Parity and certain medications are the only confirmed factors associated with prolactin levels in women. Overall, epidemiologic data suggest that prolactin is involved in breast cancer etiology. Further research to better elucidate these associations and their underlying mechanisms is warranted.

Adverse effects of prolactin in rodents and humans: breast and prostate cancer

Drugs and chemicals shown to induce mammary carcinogenesis in the rat/rodent via prolactin excess have traditionally been argued to pose little or no risk to humans in a regulatory toxicology context. The basis for this assumption is reviewed and placed into context with new evidence in humans that prolactin may be a tumour promoter in the breast and prostate. This evidence includes epidemiology, patient studies involving endocrine evaluation and molecular biology in human cells. It is concluded that hyperprolactinaemia is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk in both post and premenopausal women, that rat carcinogenicity studies are predictive of the human response, and that in a regulatory toxicology context prolactin-induced mammary tumours from nongenotoxic drugs and chemicals are an adverse effect that should not be ignored. More evidence is required concerning prostate cancer risk but molecular biology indicates that prolactin also induces prostate cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis, which are similar to the responses observed in breast cancer cells.

Prolactin does not cause breast cancer and may prevent it or be therapeutic in some conditions

The polypeptide hormone prolactin (PRL), ubiquitous and multifunctional in vertebrates, always interested biologists, was of restricted concern to clinicians and researched little compared to insulin and growth hormone. PRL in lactation initially aroused relatively little interest, but it rose when with ovarian steroids and chemical carcinogens, it was implicated in rodent mammary carcinoma. It declined when PRL suppression did not counter breast cancer. Meanwhile, long-known, estrogen-related cancers in the ovary and breast did not deter wide estrogen use for contraception and supplementation despite risk, and estrogen blockers and inhibitors have improved treatment and are on trial for prophylaxis, despite serious short and long term side-effects. Despite the great differences between steroid and polypeptide, research on PRL and breast cancer mirroring that on estrogens is now growing. This is mainly negative, much due to recent prospective research reporting minor rises in plasma levels as a basis, together with some recent laboratory research, for a hypothesis that PRL induces post-menopausal breast cancer. That view contradicts a reproductive biology that evolved to benefit women and offspring. Elevated PRL in pregnancy and probably that in lactation, reduce risk. Many exogenous chemical and physical PRL-stimulants also do not increase risk. It has not been shown that PRL increases risk of breast cancer and some older and recent cell and tissue data suggest it may be the key, two-sided, in human breast tissue homeostasis. Excessive disturbance of this is unlikely to originate in PRL itself. The natural biology of PRL, the reproductive woman's hormone par excellence, and research in various fields, suggest a positive potential in the PRL family for direct prevention and treatment of breast cancer, possibly greater than that in the estrogens. It is time to debate and research this.

Hyperprolactinaemia as an adverse effect in regulatory and clinical toxicology: role in breast and prostate cancer

Historically, hyperprolactinaemia has been considered of low toxicological relevance when detected in toxicity studies, and even mammary carcinogenesis induced in the rat by prolactin excess has been considered of no relevance to humans. However, recent findings from human epidemiology and molecular biology suggests that prolactin is a risk factor for human breast cancer, and probably prostate cancer. Therefore, this new evidence should be considered in the various decisions to develop and license a new drug or chemical if the compound causes hyperprolactinaemia. This emerging evidence suggests that prolactin can also be produced locally from human breast cancer cells, and that, regardless of source (ie, pituitary or autocrine/paracrine production from cancer cells), prolactin is mitogenic, stimulates proliferation and suppresses apoptosis in breast and prostate cancer cells. This review outlines the evidence that hyperprolactinaemia should be considered a toxicological adverse effect and concludes that prolactin-induced rodent mammary carcinogenesis is relevant to humans and is not species-specific. The effects of prolactin on the prostate gland are also discussed; hyperprolactinaemia may be an additional risk factor for prostate cancer and this also requires consideration in toxicological risk assessments. The implications of increased prolactin secretion as an adverse effect for regulatory toxicology of drugs and chemicals, and in high risk patients receiving therapeutic drugs with hyperprolactinaemic side effects, is discussed. Alteration of prolactin level is also a novel mechanism that requires consideration in endocrine disruption research, since both endogenous oestrogens and also xenoestrogens stimulate prolactin secretion or affect prolactin receptors.

Human relevance of rodent prolactin-induced non-genotoxic mammary carcinogenesis: prolactin involvement in human breast cancer and significance for toxicology risk assessments

Prolactin-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rodents, particularly rats, is often stated to be of low toxicological relevance to humans. This opinion appears to have developed from a number of lines of cited evidence. Firstly, there had been long experience of use of dopamine antagonists (that increase prolactin) in human medicine and no evidence of an increase in breast cancer incidence or risk had been reported. Secondly, dopamine agonists (that lower prolactin) had been shown to have no effect in human breast cancer treatment. Thirdly, the actions of prolactin were considered different between rodents and humans. However, recent evidence now suggests that prolactin has a major role in human breast cancer, and the similarity of mechanism with the rodent suggests that prolactin-mediated mammary carcinogenesis in rodents could be of much higher toxicological relevance to humans than previously thought. Large epidemiology studies have upgraded a limited database and shown that dopamine antagonists (both antipsychotics and anti-emetics) increase breast cancer risk, that hyperprolactinaemia is consistently associated with human breast cancer growth, development and poor prognosis, and that prolactin is indeed a mitogen in human breast cancer cells that suppresses apoptosis and upregulates BRCA1. It is now clear that initial studies giving dopamine agonists to breast cancer patients had no effect because breast cancer cells also produced prolactin independently of the pituitary, which remained uncontrolled and unrecognized in early clinical studies. The evidence for the role of prolactin in human breast cancer is now strong and consistent, and is discussed and related to the risk assessment of drugs and chemicals. The conclusion is that it is invalid to suggest that prolactin-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rodents is of low relevance to humans because prolactin can induce an adverse response in the mammary tissue of both rodents and humans alike. Drugs and chemicals causing rodent prolactin-induced mammary carcinogenesis may therefore pose a risk to humans via the same mechanism if exposures also increase prolactin secretion in humans.

Prolactin: the forgotten hormone of human breast cancer

Prolactin (PRL) is both a mitogen and a differentiating agent in the mammary gland. It has been shown to be involved in mammary cancer development in rodents, but in human breast cancer, its role has long been overlooked. Three criteria are applied to demonstrate PRL's involvement in this disease: (1) PRL receptors are present in human breast cancer cells, (2) human breast cancer cells in culture respond to PRL as a mitogen, and (3) PRL is synthesized by human breast cancer cells and inhibition of the binding of PRL to its receptors inhibits cell growth.

Serum prolactin levels and their relationship to survival in women with operable breast cancer

The prognostic value of serum prolactin levels was assessed in a sequential series of 739 patients who were initially treated at Guy's Hospital, London, between 1975 and 1980. Prolactin was measured in 472 patients 1 day before (Hpr1) and in 457 patients 10 days after (Hpr2) mastectomy. Follow-up of the patients was up to August 1992 giving 6139 women-years with a median follow-up time of 11.5 years (13.7 for patients still living and 5.1 for those dead). The association between the three prolactin variables and reproductive and clinical factors was examined before assessing the prognostic value of prolactin levels in terms of overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival. Multivariate survival models were used in order to adjust for the effect of other prognostic variables. These were found to be: tumour size, degree of nodal involvement, tumour grade and age at diagnosis. The results showed that high Hpr2 or high postoperative increase in prolactin (i.e. Hpr2-Hpr1) were significantly related to shorter disease-specific survival (p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively) in postmenopausal women. In addition there was some indication, which did not attain formal significance, for this association to occur for disease-free survival. Thus the rise in blood prolactin levels after surgery may be a weak indicator of poor prognosis of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project data can determine whether the prognosis of breast cancer is affected by the time of surgery during the menstrual cycle

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP) data to ascertain whether the prognosis of breast cancer in premenopausal women is affected when surgery is performed relative to the different phases of the menstrual cycle. In the Louisville BCDDP only 40 cases were available for study, but even with this small number, the data indicate that survivorship was superior when the surgery was performed between days 7-20 of the menstrual cycle (P < 0.06). One thousand eighty-seven premenopausal women underwent surgery for breast cancer during the first 5 years of the national BCDDP, beginning in 1972. This large number of cases, plus the long period of follow-up should provide sufficient statistical power for us to evaluate if there is any relationship between the day of the menstrual cycle, the day surgery was performed, and prognosis. This feasibility study indicates that these women should be followed up and the appropriate statistical studies should be done.

Serum immunoreactive and bioactive lactogenic hormones in advanced breast cancer patients treated with bromocriptine and octreotide

6 patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed first and second line endocrine therapies received bromocriptine (1.25-2.5 mg twice daily per os) and octreotide (Sandostatin) via a continuous subcutaneous infusion (200-400 micrograms/24 h) until disease progression. Pre-treatment 24-h profiles of serum lactogenic hormones and their response to standard provocative tests were established and repeated at 2 weeks, and 3 and 6 months (or at tumour progression). Immunoreactive prolactin (ir-PRL), growth hormone (ir-GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) were measured by radioimmunoassay and bioactive lactogenic hormone levels (BLH) were estimated using the Nb2 rat lymphoma cell bioassay. Before treatment all patients showed episodic secretion of ir-PRL, ir-GH and BLH and provocative stimuli resulted in a peak of ir-GH and BLH maximal between 60 and 90 min after injection but no change in ir-PRL. After 2 weeks of treatment, ir-PRL levels were reduced to below the limit of detection in all 6 patients. Peaks of ir-GH and BLH were still apparent, although much reduced. Immunoreactive PRL continued to be profoundly suppressed in 3 of the 4 patients who remained on treatment for 3 to 6 months. Small pulses of ir-GH were still detectable in these patients with which BLH was, again, well correlated. After 2 weeks of treatment, serum IGF-I levels were reduced by 9-54% of the pretreatment values and generally remained suppressed throughout treatment. Clinically, 4 patients did not show disease progression for periods of up to 6 months and side-effects were minimal.

Surgically induced cytokinetic responses in experimental rat mammary tumor models

The effect of surgical removal of "primary" tumors on the cytokinetics of local tumor remnants, secondary implants, and metastases was investigated in three different rat tumor models in the Wag/Rij rat: a slow-growing (MCR83) and a fast-growing (EMR86) hormone-dependent mammary tumor and a rapidly, but autonomously growing carcinoma (MCR86). The latter two tumors had metastatic potential. Cell kinetic studies were done using in vivo labeling with 5'-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd). Thirty-three hours after removal of a subcutaneous MCR83 flank tumor, secondary implants showed a significant (P less than 0.05) but transient increase in the BrdUrd labeling index (LI). A more rapid and prolonged increase, lasting for at least 7 days, was observed in EMR86 lymph node and lung metastases. In both models, no effect was observed after sham surgery (consisting of opening and closing of the skin under anesthesia). Removal of MCR86 tumors (growing in the hind leg muscle) also resulted in a rapid, transient LI increase in metastases. Continuous BrdUrd labeling experiments in this tumor model did not favor the hypothesis that the LI increase predominantly resulted from an increase in the growth fraction. Moreover, in this model, the effect was related to operation trauma. A similar increase in LI, although smaller than after tumor removal, was seen after major surgical trauma in MCR83 flank tumors. These results indicate that in the rat, tumor removal and/or major surgical trauma may modulate the cytokinetics of distant metastases significantly. A study of the systemic, possibly endocrine, factors involved in the growth-stimulating effect of surgical trauma in these rat tumor models may help to assess the clinical relevance of these findings for patients with breast cancer.

Endocrine status in patients with mammary gland diseases: correlation between steroid hormones and sex steroid binding globulin

We have studied 131 women affected by benign or malignant breast disease, in order to explore their endocrine status. We evaluated basal concentrations of the following hormones: FSH, LH, PRL, estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), androstenedione (A), DHEAS and SHBG. Basal hormone levels in these patients were not significantly different from those in normal age-matched subjects. However, in premenopausal women, 31% of patients with benign disease and 34.4% with malignant lumps exhibited an elevated FSH/LH ratio (greater than 1) and lower T levels, compared to those having a normal FSH/LH ratio. The difference in T levels was not coupled with the expected specular variations in SHBG levels. Moreover, in none of the group considered, T concentrations or E2/T were significantly correlated with SHBG levels. These data seem to suggest an altered regulation of SHBG in these patients, in whom the modulation of SHBG by circulating sexual steroids appears to be different when compared with normal subjects.

Relation between Surgery-Induced Prolactin Increase and the Menstrual Cycle Phase at Time of Surgery in Premenopausal Breast Cancer

It has been suggested that both the menstrual cycle phase and postoperative changes in prolactin (PRL) secretion at the time of surgery may influence the prognosis of breast cancer. The present study was carried out to evaluate the relation between menstrual cycle period and surgery-induced PRL variations. We evaluated 32 premenopausal women with operable breast carcinoma; 17 were in perimenstrual phase (days 1-6 and 21-28) and 15 were in the mid-cycle (days 7-20) period at’ the time of surgery. To investigate serum levels of PRL, venous blood samples were collected before and 7 days after surgery. Postoperative hyperprolactinemia occurred in 17/32 patients and it was statistically more frequent in patients surgically treated during the perimenstrual phase than in the mid-cycle phase (12/17 vs 5/15; p < 0.05), while no other parameter (including axillary node and estrogen receptor status) showed a significant influence on hyperprolactinemia rate. The results suggest that in premenopausal breast cancer patients surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia may be influenced by the menstrual cycle phase at the time of surgery.

Plasma prolactin as an indicator of disease progression in advanced breast cancer

Serial plasma prolactin levels were measured in 144 breast cancer patients (premenopausal [PR-M], N = 64; postmenopausal [PO-M], N = 80) and compared with respective controls. Patients with breast cancer were grouped into those who (1) developed distant metastasis, (2) developed local recurrence, (3) stable disease, and (4) responded to the various therapeutic modalities at the end of 2 years. The authors' analysis showed excellent correlation between serial plasma prolactin changes and the response to therapy or progression of disease in patients with advanced breast carcinoma.

Postoperative hyperprolactinaemia and early recurrence rate in breast cancer

Serum levels of prolactin before and after surgery were measured in 90 women with breast cancer until the 5th postoperative month. Surgery-induced hyperprolactinaemia occurred in 51 patients, without significant correlation to any other clinical variable. After a median follow-up of 39 months, irrespective of each other variable (i.e. nodal involvement, oestrogen receptor status, adjuvant therapies), patients with postoperative hyperprolactinaemia had a significantly lower recurrence rate than those in whom surgery was not followed by an abnormal increase in prolactin secretion (3/51 vs. 13/39, P less than 0.001). These results suggest that, despite the stimulatory role of prolactin on mammary tumours, the lack of postoperative hyperprolactinaemia is an unfavourable prognostic factor because of its association with a higher relapse rate.

Estrogens are not required for prolactin induced growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in continuous culture respond to the growth promoting activity of prolactin. Within 3 days of addition to culture medium in the presence of charcoal stripped fetal bovine serum which is depleted of bovine lactogens and estrogens, prolactin at 250 ng/ml promotes a 2- to 3-fold increase in cell number. When phenol red, which is a weak estrogen agonist, is also eliminated from the medium, the cells respond to prolactin to the same extent. When cells are grown for two generations in the presence of lactogen free, phenol red free, charcoal stripped serum, the prolactin induced response is even greater. Human and ovine prolactins are equipotent. The ability of the cells to bind lactogenic hormones remains unaltered by elimination of phenol red from the growth medium. These data indicate that prolactin alone is a mitogen for human breast cancer cells in long-term culture.

The permanent effect of reproductive events on blood prolactin levels and its relation to breast cancer risk: a population study of postmenopausal women

In each of two population-based studies conducted on the Island of Guernsey between 1967-1976 and 1977-1984, respectively, single specimens of blood were taken from over 5000 normal women. From these two studies there were 1173 and 946 postmenopausal women in whom blood prolactin was determined and multivariate analysis was used to establish the association between blood prolactin concentration and possible determinants of risk of breast cancer. Since prolactin levels were log-normally distributed these analyses were done on log-transformed data. The age at menarche or menopause, age at first or last childbirth, length of reproductive life (i.e. time from menarche to menopause) or post-menopausal life (i.e. time from menopause to time of blood sampling), contraceptive use and history of breast cancer were not significantly associated with blood prolactin concentration. Of significance were age, parity, time of blood sampling and assay drift. Ponderosity (Quetelet's Index) was positively associated with prolactin concentration and this was significant using a one-tail criterion. Women with a mammographic pattern designated DY by Wolfe had significantly higher prolactin levels than those with N1 patterns. However, the main finding to emerge was that after standardizing for all the other variables increasing parity was related to a step-wise reduction in blood prolactin levels. Since this had occurred in women who had had their last child up to 35 years previously it implies this effect is permanent. It could therefore be that the protective effect on breast cancer risk of multiparity and early first pregnancy could be mediated by such a life-long reduction in blood prolactin levels.

Perioperative bromocriptine adjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer

Blood levels of prolactin are consistently raised in women who have undergone mastectomy for breast cancer, probably because of the stress of surgery. Since this increase in concentration of a known breast epithelial growth promoter might stimulate proliferation in micrometastatic cells shed at the time of surgery, a pilot study was conducted to try to abolish this effect. 38 patients with suspected operable breast cancer were given either bromocriptine (18) or placebo (20) tablets for 5 days preoperatively and thereafter for 3-10 days. Bromocriptine-treated patients showed significant reductions in prolactin levels and in S-phase fraction of tumour cells within the primary infiltrating carcinoma. There were no major side-effects. Perioperative bromocriptine may provide another approach to adjuvant therapy, possibly combined with endocrine or cytotoxic treatment for patients with axillary nodal metastases.

Effects of radical mastectomy on prolactin blood levels in patients with breast cancer

The role played by PRL in human breast cancer is still obscure. Several observations, however, demonstrated that antitumor therapies for breast cancer are associated with changes in PRL secretion, clinical significance of which remains to be determined. The present investigation was carried out to further clarify the effects of mastectomy on PRL levels in breast cancer women. The study included 34 patients at clinical stage T1-2N0-2M0 treated with radical mastectomy. In each patient, venous blood samples were drawn before, and 15 days, 1 month, 45 days, 2 months and 3 months after surgery to determine PRL serum levels. As controls, 14 women surgically treated for reasons other than neoplastic disease were included in the study. Mastectomy was followed by hyperprolactinemia in 18 of the 34 cases (52.9%). PRL remained elevated for at least 1 month, and it became normal within 2 months. On the contrary, no PRL increase was seen in controls. Among breast cancer women, PRL increase was irrespective of the type of surgery, the histology of the tumor and the menopausal status. In contrast, PRL increase was significantly higher in patients without node involvement and with negative hormonal receptors, with respect to that observed in cases with node involvement and positive receptors, respectively. The mechanisms by which mastectomy induces enhanced PRL secretion are still obscure. They might depend, however, on changes in feed-back systems operating in the regulation of PRL secretion, due to the removal of a target organ for PRL itself. Longitudinal studies, by evaluating the percentage of relapse either in patients with surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia or in those with normal hormonal values, will be needed to clarify the prognostic significance of the enhanced PRL secretion induced by mastectomy.

Ovarian function and adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer

The effect of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) on ovarian function has been studied in 74 pre-menopausal patients with operable breast cancer. After median follow-up of 47 months, 50, 70 and 80% of 35 patients receiving CMF became permanently amenorrhoeic within 3, 6 and 12 months respectively; in contrast, only 5 in the no treatment (control) group of 39 patients became permanently amenorrhoeic within 12 months. Younger patients (less than 35 years) were more likely to retain or regain menstrual function while on or after CMF treatment. Estimation of ovarian and pituitary hormones in a subset of these women showed that CMF treatment was associated with a decrease in serum oestradiol and progesterone and an increase in serum follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone to post-menopausal levels. These hormonal changes are consistent with the induction of amenorrhoea during CMF treatment and the absence of resumption of menstrual function after completion of treatment suggests that CMF causes permanent ovarian ablation in a majority of these patients.