Intrapericardial instillation of bleomycin in the management of malignant pericardial effusion

Intrapericardial steroid treatment for recurrent pericardial effusion in a patient with acute lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Intrapericardial corticosteroid therapy for pericardial effusion is an uncommon practice. We had an initial experience with this therapeutic measure but this was our first attempt in the context of malignant diseases and paraneoplastic syndrome. A patient with relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and recurrent pericardial effusion presented. She had been treated by pericardiocenthesis and systemic corticosteroids on two occasions. Following the second pericardiocenthesis and pericardial drainage, methylprednisolone was injected into the pericardium prior to withdrawal of the draining catheter. The patient had a dramatic clinical improvement with a short hospital stay and a lower dose of systemic steroids. We conclude that Intrapericardial steroids injection may be beneficial for patients with paraneoplastic syndrome and pericardial effusion.

Neoplastic pericardial disease: Old and current strategies for diagnosis and management

The prevalence of neoplastic pericardial diseases has changed over time and varies according to diagnostic methods. The diagnostic factor is usually the detection of neoplastic cells within the pericardial fluid or in specimens of pericardium, but the diagnosis may be difficult. Accurate sampling and cytopreparatory techniques, together with ancillary studies, including immunohistochemical tests and neoplastic marker dosage, are essential to obtain a reliable diagnosis. The goals of treatment may be simply to relieve symptoms (cardiac tamponade or dyspnea), to prevent recurrent effusion for a long-term symptomatic benefit, or to treat the local neoplastic disease with the aim of prolonging survival. Immediate relief of symptoms may be obtained with percutaneous drainage or with a surgical approach. For long term prevention of recurrences, various approaches have been proposed: extended drainage, pericardial window (surgical or percutaneous balloon pericardiostomy), sclerosing local therapy, local and/or systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) (external or with intrapericardial radionuclides). The outcomes of various therapeutic approaches vary for different tumor types. Lymphoma and leukemias can be successfully treated with systemic chemotherapy; for solid tumors, percutaneous drainage and the use of systemic and/or local sclerosing and antineoplastic therapy seems to offer the best chance of success. The use of "pure" sclerosing agents has been replaced by agents with both sclerosing and antineoplastic activity (bleomycin or thiotepa), which seems to be quite effective in breast cancer, at least when associated with systemic chemotherapy. Local chemotherapy with platinum, mitoxantrone and other agents may lead to good local control of the disease, but the addition of systemic chemotherapy is probably relevant in order to prolong survival. The surgical approach (creation of a pericardial window, even with the mini-invasive method of balloon pericardiostomy) and RT may be useful in recurring effusions or in cases that are refractory to other therapeutic approaches.

Diagnosis and management of chronic pericardial effusions

Chronic pericardial effusions are a major cause of morbidity in some clinical settings. Although the treatment of choice for acute symptomatic pericardial effusions (tamponade) is pericardiocentesis, the long-term management of symptomatic chronic pericardial effusions provides a greater challenge. The aim of this review is to provide insight into the presentation,diagnosis, and different treatment options available to patients with chronic symptomatic pericardial effusions,with emphasis on malignant pericardial effusions. Peri-cardiocentesis with sclerosing agents, radiation therapy,percutaneous, and surgical pericardiotomy and other surgical techniques are particularly efficacious, depend-ing on the underlying cause and the patient's prognosis.

Treatment of malignant pericardial effusion with 32P-colloid

Malignant pericardial effusion is usually treated only when signs of cardiac tamponade develop. Several methods of treatment have been reported with an overall response rate of approximately 75%. Since our initial study using intrapericardial 32P-colloid instillation as a treatment modality for pericardial effusion demonstrated a significant higher response rate, this study was conducted to further evaluate the efficacy of intrapericardial 32P-colloid in terms of response rates and duration of remissions. Intrapericardial instillation of 185-370 MBq (5-10 mCi) 32P-colloid in 36 patients with malignant pericardial effusion resulted in a complete remission rate of 94.5% (34 patients) whereas two patients did not respond to treatment due to a foudroyant formation of pericardial fluid. The median duration time was 8 months. No side-effects were observed. These results suggest that intrapericardial instillation of 32P-colloid is a simple, reliable and safe treatment strategy for patients with malignant pericardial effusions. Therefore, since further evidence is provided that 32P-colloid is significantly more effective than external radiation or non-radioactive sclerosing agents, this treatment modality should be considered for the management of malignant pericardial effusion.

Minimally invasive access of the normal pericardium: initial clinical experience with a novel device

The pericardial space is being investigated as a reservoir for local drug delivery to the heart and coronary arteries. Intrapericardial drug delivery is currently limited because the pericardial space is normally small and difficult to access by standard pericardiocentesis without invasive surgery or risk of cardiac injury. Clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate a novel, minimally invasive, pericardial access device (PerDUCER, Comedicus Inc., Columbia Heights, Minn.). As of October 26, 1998, 12 clinical trials have been completed on patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures. In all patients, a stab incision was made 1" subxiphoid and a 17G angled cannula, with preloaded guidewire, was advanced into the mediastinal space. After cannula removal, a 19F sheath/dilator was inserted over the wire. In eight patients, a median sternotomy was performed and the position of the sheath over the anterior pericardium (PC) was visually verified. Four patients underwent a closed-chest, fluoroscopy-assisted procedure. In all patients, the PerDUCER was inserted into the chest, via the sheath, and positioned over the PC. The PC was captured by suction and a bleb was formed within a side-hole on the PerDUCER tip. A sheathed needle was advanced, puncturing the isolated bleb of PC. A guidewire was advanced through the needle into the pericardial space and the PerDUCER was removed. Guidewire insertion was successful in 10 patients (7 on first attempt, 3 on second) without adverse hemodynamic effects or arrhythmia. Other than the guidewire insertion site, there was no evidence of injury to the PC or the heart. These initial clinical trials suggest that the PerDUCER may provide safe, rapid and effective percutaneous insertion of a guidewire into the normal pericardial space.

Intrapericardial cisplatin for the management of patients with large malignant pericardial effusion in the course of the lung cancer

Patients with cardiac tamponade or large malignant pericardial effusion, who survived longer than 30 days after withdrawal of catheter from the pericardial space, entered the study. Main goal of investigations was: evaluation of the effectiveness and side-effects of intrapericardial administration of cisplatin in cases with malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) and cardiac tamponade or large pericardial effusion in a course of the lung cancer. Sixteen patients (four women and 12 men), mean age 53 years, median age 57 years, range 27-70 years, entered this retrospective study. After pericardiocentesis and insertion of a polyurethane catheter, pericardial fluid was drained. Malignant etiology of pericardial fluid was confirmed by cytological examination and/or by echocardiography. The diagnosis of malignancy was based upon histological examination of samples obtained from primary tumor. After confirmation of MPE cisplatin (10 mg in 20 ml normal saline) was instilled over 5 min during 1-5 consecutive days (maximal total cisplatin dose in single course: 50 mg) directly into pericardial space. If a large pericardial fluid reoccurred the courses with intrapericardial administration of cisplatin were repeated. Treatment was considered successful if the patient with malignant effusion survived 30 days without recurrence of symptoms of large pericardial effusion and no other interventions directed to the pericardium were required. In 14 (87.5%) cases malignant pericardial effusion was confirmed by cytological analysis of pericardial fluid. In two cases echocardiography confirmed metastatic tumors to the pericardium. Positive effect of intrapericardial treatment with cisplatin was achieved in 15 cases (93.75%). Mean survival period in the whole group was 6.59 months (+/-6.2 months), median survival period was 3.7 months, range 2-24.1 months. There were no complications related to the pericardiocentesis. Transient atrial fibrillation was detected in three patients (18.8%). Mild nausea occurred in one case. No hypotension and retrosternal pain were observed. Cisplatin administered directly into pericardial space (CAP) seems to be effective and safe. No sclerosis of the pericardial space was observed after CAP.

New approaches to the management and treatment of malignant pericardial effusion

The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the effectiveness of intrapericardial administration of tetracycline, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with recurrent malignant pericardial effusion. In 33 cases with malignant pericardial effusion 46 pericardiocenteses under two-dimensional echo-cardiography were performed. No complications were observed after this procedure. Pericardiocentesis was followed by catheterization of the pericardial space for a mean period of 15 days (range 1-64). In 4 cases bacterial pericarditis was observed during catheterization. The mean volume of the pericardial fluid was 2.41 (range 0.4-13 l). In cases with bloody pericardial fluid the PO2, PCO2 and pH of the fluid were estimated and the results compared with the values for venous blood obtained from the upper limbs. Highly statistically significant differences were documented. Twenty cases of malignant pericardial effusion were treated with direct pericardial administration of cisplatin, 3 with 5-fluorouracil and 2 with tetracycline. Good results (no fluid reaccumulation) were observed only after cisplatin therapy. We conclude that pericardiocentesis performed under two-dimensional echo cardiography, followed by pericardial catheterization and direct pericardial treatment with cisplatin are the methods of choice in cases with malignant pericardial effusion. In cases with bloody pericardial fluid PO2, PCO2 and pH analysis can be useful to differentiate the source of the bloody fluid (blood or bloody fluid).

Multiple myeloma with pericardial involvement and cardiac tamponade: a report of three patients

Pericardial involvement and cardiac tamponade are rare complications of multiple myeloma (MM) and in most reported cases it has been diagnosed only at autopsy. Three cases of multiple myeloma with pericardial involvement seen at a single institution are described. The approach to the treatment is discussed and the literature on this rare complication of MM is briefly reviewed.

Malignancy-related pericardial effusion. 127 cases from the Roswell Park Cancer Institute

BACKGROUND

Malignancy-related pericardial effusions may represent a terminal event in patients with therapeutically unresponsive disease. However, select patients with malignancies sensitive to available therapies may achieve significant improvement in palliation and long term survival with prompt recognition and appropriate intervention.

METHODS

From 1968 to 1994, 150 invasive procedures were performed for the treatment or diagnosis of pericardial effusion in 127 patients with underlying malignancies. These cases were reviewed retrospectively to best identify the clinical features, appropriate diagnostic workup, and optimal therapy for this complication of malignancy.

RESULTS

Dyspnea (81%) and an abnormal pulsus paradoxus (32%) were the most common symptoms. Echocardiography had a 96% diagnostic accuracy. Cytology and pericardial biopsy had sensitivities of 90% and 56%, respectively. Fifty-five percent of all effusions were malignant comprising 71% of adenocarcinomas of the lung, breast, esophagus, and unknown primary site. In 57 patients, a malignant effusion could not be determined, and no definitive etiology could be established for 74% of these effusions. Radiation-induced, infectious, and hemorrhagic pericarditis each were identified in fewer than 5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Subxyphoid pericardiotomy proved to be a safe and effective intervention that successfully relieved pericardial effusions in 99% of cases with recurrence and reoperation rates of 9% and 7%, respectively. Survival most closely was related to the extent of disease and its inherent chemo-/radiosensitivity, with 72% of the patients who survived longer than 1 year having breast cancer, leukemia, or lymphoma.

Intrapericardial cisplatin for the management of patients with large malignant pericardial effusion

Nine patients (seven men and two women), median age 57 years (range 40-68 years), with large malignant pericardial effusion confirmed by cytological examination, were treated with direct intrapericardial administration of cisplatin. After insertion of a polyurethane catheter, fluid was drained and cisplatin (10 mg in 20 ml normal saline) was instilled over 5 min during 5 consecutive days (total cisplatin dose: 50 mg). If fluid reaccumulation occurred the courses were repeated every 3 weeks. All of the patients achieved a complete therapeutic response (no more fluid reaccumulation). The median time of response was 2.8 months (range 1-24 months). Mild nausea occurred in two patients, supraventricular arrhythmia in one patient and infectious complications in one patient. Eight patients died because of disease progression without evidence of cardiac tamponade or stricture. Autopsy, performed in 7 cases, revealed neoplastic involvement of the pericardium in all of the patients, but pericardial effusion was seen in one patient only.

Critical Care of Intrathoracic Complications of Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common underlying malignancy in cancer patients admitted to intensive care units. Because of the proximity to vital organs in the mediastinum, lung cancer frequently causes complications requiring critical care, including cardiac tamponade, central airway obstruction, massive hemopytsis, and superior vena cava syndrome. In addition, radiation and chemotherapeutic agents used to treat lung cancer may cause life-threatening pneumonitis in a minority of patients. There are several management options available for each complication. Educated decisions must be made based on individual patient circumstances. Technological advances have allowed for successful treatment of the majority of patients with such complications. For example, photoresection with the NdYAG laser can relieve dyspnea in 18% of patients with airway obstruction; hemorrhage can be controlled 80% of the time with bronchial artery embolization; and symptoms of superior vena cava syndrome may be relieved in more than 90% of patients. Although the median survival of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit is relatively short, such interventions can effectively palliate symptoms and may prolong survival.

Multiple myeloma complicated by restrictive cardiomyopathy and cardiac tamponade

Restrictive cardiomyopathy from amyloid deposition within the myocardium is a well-described complication of multiple myeloma; however, myelomatous involvement of pericardium with subsequent cardiac tamponade has rarely been described. Optimal treatment for malignant involvement of the pericardium by myeloma cells has yet to be established. The following description is of a patient with myocardial and pericardial manifestations of multiple myeloma. Treatment of the malignant pericardial effusion was implemented with intrapericardial administration of bleomycin. This therapy resulted in no recurrence of pericardial effusion at nine days follow-up. Despite the absence of detectable recurrent effusion, the patient died suddenly from causes felt unrelated to pericardial disease.

Intrapericardial OK-432 instillation for the management of malignant pericardial effusion

Ten patients with malignant pericardial effusion were treated with intrapericardial injection of OK-432 (penicillin-treated and heat-treated lyophilized powder of the substrain of Streptococcus pyogenes A3). After intrapericardial insertion of a catheter, a maximal volume of pericardial fluid was withdrawn with cytologic confirmation of malignancy. Five or 10 Klinische Einheit (KE) (KE is a unit used to express the strength of a preparation) of OK-432 diluted in 20 ml of saline was injected into the pericardial space in seven and three patients, respectively. It was repeated in case of reaccumulation. Seven patients were treated only once and the remaining three required a second treatment. Complete control of pericardial effusion was achieved in all patients for an average of 329 days (range, 54 to 790 days). Fever and chest pain were experienced in six and five patients, respectively, but were controlled with antipyretics. Two of three patients who received 10 KE of OK-432 experienced hypotension that was successfully controlled with vasopressor drugs with or without reaspiration of pericardial fluid. Rapid reactive reaccumulation of the pericardial fluid was thought to be a cause of hypotension. A follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan was performed in seven patients and a thickened pericardium was noticed in five; no patients had constrictive pericarditis. These results suggest that intrapericardial administration of 5 KE of OK-432 is an effective and safe treatment for malignant pericardial effusion.