Immunocytochemical determination of the estrogen-regulated protein Mr 24,000 in primary breast cancer and response to endocrine therapy

Cluster analyses of the TCGA and a TMA dataset using the coexpression of HSP27 and CRYAB improves alignment with clinical-pathological parameters of breast cancer and suggests different epichaperome influences for each sHSP

Our cluster analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas for co-expression of HSP27 and CRYAB in breast cancer patients identified three patient groups based on their expression level combination (high HSP27 + low CRYAB; low HSP27 + high CRYAB; similar HSP27 + CRYAB). Our analyses also suggest that there is a statistically significant inverse relationship between HSP27 and CRYAB and known clinicopathological markers in breast cancer. Screening an unbiased 248 breast cancer patient tissue microarray (TMA) for the protein expression of HSP27 and phosphorylated HSP27 (HSP27-82pS) with CRYAB also identified three patient groups based on HSP27 and CRYAB expression levels. TMA24 also had recorded clinical-pathological parameters, such as ER and PR receptor status, patient survival, and TP53 mutation status. High HSP27 protein levels were significant with ER and PR expression. HSP27-82pS associated with the best patient survival (Log Rank test). High CRYAB expression in combination with wild-type TP53 was significant for patient survival, but a different patient outcome was observed when mutant TP53 was combined with high CRYAB expression. Our data suggest that HSP27 and CRYAB have different epichaperome influences in breast cancer, but more importantly evidence the value of a cluster analysis that considers their coexpression. Our approach can deliver convergence for archival datasets as well as those from recent treatment and patient cohorts and can align HSP27 and CRYAB expression to important clinical-pathological features of breast cancer.

Differential expression of breast cancer-associated genes between stage- and age-matched tumor specimens from African- and Caucasian-American Women diagnosed with breast cancer

Background

Recent studies suggest that the poorer breast cancer outcome observed in African-American women (AAW) may, in part, result from underlying molecular factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate gene expression differences between Caucasian-American women (CAW) and AAW that may contribute to this poorer prognosis.

Methods

The expression of 84 genes involved in breast carcinoma prognosis, response to therapy, estrogen signaling, and tumor aggressiveness was assessed in age- and stage-matched CAW and AAW paraffin-embedded breast cancer specimens. The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney Test was used to identify genes with a significant difference in expression between CAW and AAW. To determine if the differentially expressed genes could segregate between the CAW and AAW, we performed semi-supervised principal component analysis (SSPCA).

Results

Twenty genes were differentially expressed between AAW and CAW. SSPCA incorporating these 20 genes segregated AAW and CAW into two distinct groups. AAW were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to display aberrations in G₁/S cell-cycle regulatory genes, decreased expression of cell-adhesion genes, and low to no expression of ESR1, PGR, ERBB2 and estrogen pathway targets.

Conclusions

The gene expression differences identified between AAW and CAW may contribute to more aggressive disease, resistance to therapy, enhanced metastatic potential and poor clinical outcome. These findings support the hypothesis that breast cancer specimens collected from AAW display distinct gene expression differences compared to similar tissues obtained from CAW. Additional population-based studies are necessary to determine if these gene expression variations contribute to the highly aggressive and treatment-resistant breast cancer phenotype frequently observed in AAW.

Heat shock protein (HSP)27: a further refinement in the diagnosis of suspicious fine needle aspirates of breast

The technique of fine needle aspiration (FNA) is increasingly used in the investigation of breast abnormalities both palpable and impalpable. However, up to 20% of aspirates fall into two categories which require further investigation, because they either show cytological atypia or exhibit features which are suspicious of malignancy (reporting categories C3 and C4). The usefulness of the 27-kD heat shock protein (HSP27) expression in refining these categories of suspicion, and possibly in predicting malignancy, was investigated using an established immunocytochemical staining procedure. Positive HSP27 staining was shown by 73.1% of C4 and 33.3% of C3 FNAs. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the results obtained for the C3 and C4 FNAs.

Estrogen regulated messenger RNAs in human breast cancer cells

A large number of estrogen-regulated mRNAs have been identified in human breast cancer cells. Some of these encode proteins whose regulation by estrogen had been established previously. Others have been identified by differential screening of cDNA libraries established from estrogen-stimulated breast cancer cells. The regulation of these RNAs by estrogens in different cell lines is reviewed. The possible role of their gene products where known is discussed as is the possibility that the proteins mediate the proliferative effects of estrogens on breast cancer cells. The possibility that measurement of one or more of these estrogen-regulated gene products in breast tumours might allow prediction of the likely benefit of patients from endocrine therapies is evaluated. Finally the impact that they have had on current understanding of how estrogens and antiestrogens regulate transcription of endogenous genes in human breast cancer cells is considered.

Oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, pS2, ERD5, HSP27 and cathepsin D in invasive ductal breast carcinomas

Hormonal receptors and markers for prognostic evaluation were detected immunohistochemically in 196 infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemical detection of progesterone and oestrogen receptor is a method giving results generally concordant with those of the binding assay. However, immunohistochemical detection seems better. It allows the detection of hormonal receptors on small carcinomas, it is not modified by the endogenous hormones, and it has a slightly better correlation with prognosis and with the response to hormone therapy. Immunohistochemical detection of progesterone receptor has a prognostic value, sorting a negative subgroup with a poor prognosis from the oestrogen receptor positive tumours. These results can be obtained without quantitative immunohistological methods. ERD5, pS2, HSP27 and cathepsin D are associated with oestrogen receptor positivity. pS2 and HSP27 are interesting markers. They characterize a subgroup of oestrogen receptor negative tumours with a good prognosis. Moreover, pS2 is a marker of response to hormone therapy. ERD5 and cathepsin D do not appear to be of value as markers of prognosis.

Immunocytochemical determination of the estrogen-regulated proteins Mr 24,000, Mr 52,000 and DF3 breast cancer associated antigen: clinical value in advanced breast cancer and correlation with estrogen receptor

The Mr 24,000 and Mr 52,000 estrogen-regulated cytosol proteins, and the breast cancer-associated antigen DF3 have been studied in an immunocytochemical assay. Primary tumor specimens from 119 patients with advanced breast cancer who received endocrine therapy have been studied. Monoclonal antibodies were used for the detection of the proteins in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks. No correlation between Mr 52,000-positive specimens and the presence of estrogen receptor (ER) could be established (p = 0.87, chi-square test) whereas a statistically significant association between Mr 24,000 (p = 0.0002), DF3 antigen (p = 0.044) and ER was demonstrated. No intercorrelation was found between Mr 24,000 and Mr 52,000 or DF3 (p = 0.63, 0.98 and 0.12 respectively). Clinical response was evaluated for immunocytochemical findings, Mr 24,000 (p = 0.37), Mr 52,000 (p = 0.61) and DF3 (p = 0.68) showed no association whereas ER was statistically correlated (p = 0.00005). Neither overall survival nor disease-free survival correlated to Mr 24,000 (p = 0.18 and 0.75 respectively, logrank test), Mr 52,000 (p = 0.095 and 0.38), or DF3 (p = 0.22 and 0.13) staining, whereas ER-positive tumors did (p = 0.00005). Discrimination between ER-positive responders and ER-positive non-responders was not possible using either Mr 52,000, Mr 24,000 or DF3 staining. Based on our findings we conclude that immunocytochemical staining for Mr 52,000, Mr 24,000 or DF3 cannot be used as a marker to predict response to endocrine therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.