Immunocytochemical detection of progesterone receptor by monoclonal KD-68 antibody in operable breast cancer: correlations with biochemical assay, pathological features and cell proliferative rate

Comparison of different antibodies for detection of progesterone receptor in breast cancer

Monoclonal antibodies directed against human estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been used extensively for biochemical and immunohistochemical detection of receptors independent of hormone-binding assays. These antibodies have been valuable both for experimental work and for detection of receptors in clinical breast cancer specimens. The purpose of this study was to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of different antibodies for detection of PR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of formalin-fixed paraffin breast carcinoma sections. The panel of twelve antibodies included two new ones (PgR636 and PgR1294) produced prospectively to be resistant to formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Fifty-nine breast carcinomas, having known PR levels by biochemical ligand-binding assay, were used to prepare multitumor paraffin-embedded tissue blocks for characterization of the PR antibodies. Of all the antibodies tested, both PgR636 and PgR1294 stained the highest percentage of breast carcinomas known to be positive by the biochemical assay (95-98%) and they exhibited the highest concordance with the biochemical assay (88-90%). The PgR636 and PgR1294 antibodies, along with one other, PR 88, also gave the highest intensity of nuclear staining, while PgR636 and PgR1294 stained the highest mean percentage of tumor cell nuclei. Antigen retrieval was not necessary for PR immunostaining by PgR636 and PgR1294 in most tumors and other tissues examined, but did slightly increase the staining intensity. The majority of the other antibodies tested were highly dependent on antigen retrieval; only PR 88 and KD 68 antibodies approached the performance of PgR636 and PgR1294 without antigen retrieval. These results indicate that PgR636 and PgR1294 are optimal antibodies for IHC detection of PR in routine paraffin tissue blocks.

Lack of prognostic significance of the monoclonal antibody Ki-S1, a novel marker of proliferative activity, in node-negative breast carcinoma

In a series of 205 node-negative breast cancers (NNBC), we determined staining by the novel antibody Ki-S1, a marker of tumor cell proliferation, in order to test its association with other prognostic variables and its prognostic significance. Ki-S1 was determined in routinely formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Ki-S1 gave a nuclear staining in the majority of the carcinomas (188 of 205), with percentages of reacting nuclei ranging from 2% to 90% (median value of 7%). In 107 tumors frozen sections were available to also assess the Ki-67 antibody. Among these, 94 had a nuclear staining of cancer cells ranging from 5% to 80% (median value of 7%). In 46 tumors we also determined the MIB-1 antibody. The percentage of MIB-1 nuclear staining ranged from 1% to 50% (median value of 20%). There was no significant relationship between Ki-S1 and the other two cell kinetic markers. Ki-S1 labeling was significantly associated only with tumor size (p = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 6 years, Ki-S1 had no significant prognostic value for either relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) (Ki-S1 as continuous logarithmic variable; p = 0.86 and p = 0.23, respectively). For RFS the following variables had a significant prognostic value: Ki-67 (< or = 10% vs > 10%; p = 0.037); progesterone receptor (PgR) expression (- vs+/++; p = 0.041); tumor size (pT1 vs pT2-3; p = 0.042) and grading (GI vs GII-III; p = 0.047). For OS, tumor size (p = 0.0044), age (continuous variable; p = 0.0060), and Ki-67 (p = 0.043) were significantly prognostic. In multivariate analysis (final model), only tumor size retained a significant and independent prognostic value for RFS (p = 0.0042). For OS, both tumor size (p = 0.0029) and age (< or = 55 years vs > 55 years; p = 0.041) retained significance in the multivariate model. In conclusion, Ki-S1 does not seem to have prognostic relevance in this series of NNBC. Possible hypotheses to explain this observation are discussed.

c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-2 protein expression in node-negative breast carcinoma--an immunocytochemical study

The type I growth factor receptor family has been found to play an important role in the control of normal growth and differentiation. Moreover, the epidermal growth factor receptor and the c-erbB-2 oncogene seem to be implicated in the pathogenesis and behaviour of several cancers, including breast cancer. c-erbB-3 is a new member of the type I receptor family for which there is currently little information available on its expression in neoplastic tissues, and on its possible prognostic significance. This study was undertaken to define the prognostic value of c-erbB-3 expression in a series of node-negative breast cancer (NNBC) patients when compared, by multivariate analysis, with expression of the c-erbB-2 protein and conventional clinicopathological features. cerbB-3 was recognised by the novel monoclonal antibody RTJ1, whereas c-erbB-2 was detected by the polyclonal antibody 21N, using immunocytochemical methods. We found that overexpression of c-erbB-3 occurs frequently in NNBC. Overall, 138 of 212 carcinomas (65%) had some degree of membrane RTJ1 staining, and 28 (13%) showed strong and generalised positivity ( ). Twenty-four per cent of carcinomas had membrane 21N staining, and 12% presented strong and generalised positivity ( ). c-erbB-3 protein expression was significantly associated only with that of c-erbB-2 (P = 0.05), whereas 21N positivity was significantly associated with small tumour size (P = 0.02) and ductal histotype (P = 0.04). No significant correlation between expression of either receptor proteins or relapse-free survival was observed after a median follow-up of 63 months. Applying multivariate analysis, only tumour size approached significance. Our results indicate that analysis of expression of c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-2 alone do not seem to be useful in identifying patients with NNBC at different risk of relapse or death.

Fine-needle aspiration technique for the concurrent immunocytochemical evaluation of multiple biologic parameters in primary breast carcinoma

Fine-needle aspiration cytology has been already established as a reliable method for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Its application has been recently extended to immunocytochemical analysis of biological parameters. In the current study estrogen and progesterone receptors, Ki67 growth fraction, and p53 protein expression were immunocytochemically evaluated on the cellular material sampled by the same fine-needle aspirate used for the conventional cytologic diagnosis of malignancy. Fine-needle aspiration specimens from 100 patients with primary breast carcinoma were submitted to the immunocytochemical analysis. Twenty-eight percent were in premenopause; 23% had tumors with a diameter less than 2 cm, 59% from 2 to 5 cm, and 18% more than 5 cm; 60% had axillary nodal status negative, 34% positive, and 6% unknown. The concomitant immunocytochemical evaluation of all parameters was possible in 70% of the patients. A significant association was found between p53 overexpression and Ki67 values (p = 0.004), and between Ki67 values and progesterone receptor status (p = 0.003). No correlation was found between any parameter and clinical tumor size. Estrogen (p = 0.02) and progesterone (p = 0.04) receptor negativity and high Ki67 growth fraction (p = 0.005) were significantly associated with the clinical evidence of axillary node involvement. This study suggests that fine-needle aspiration cytology represents an effective practice for a simultaneous evaluation of multiple biologic indicators and could be useful as a preoperative procedure in patients who are candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy.

Progesterone receptors in routinely paraffin-embedded primary breast carcinomas and lymph node metastases

Described here is an immunohistochemical technique using the commercially available monoclonal progesterone receptor (PR) antibody KD 68 in routinely fixed and paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas and lymph node metastases. The authors' technique is compared with several incubation variations. The method applying the primary antibody in a dilution of 1:10 overnight followed by a biotinylated second antibody showed the best results when Triton X-100 was added to the buffer. Using this method, comparison with the results on frozen sections of 34 breast carcinomas yielded a significant concordance of 94%. Correlation between the results on paraffin sections and those obtained by the standard dextran-coated charcoal cytosol assay was 80%. The value of the method for predicting endocrine therapy response was shown in 20 patients. Thus the reliability of the method has been demonstrated and was applied on 151 lymph node metastases and the corresponding primary breast carcinomas from 50 patients. Generally PR content in the metastases was lower than in the primary tumors (p < 0.001). This finding indicates that evaluation of PR in lymph node metastases should be included in the decision for endocrine therapy of breast cancer.

Progesterone receptor determined by immunocytochemical and biochemical methods in human breast cancer

Immunocytochemical assay (ICA) of the progesterone receptor (PgR) was performed on 152 patients with stage I-II breast cancer. We employed the rat monoclonal antibody KD-68 and a peroxidase/antiperoxidase displaying system. The results obtained by ICA (Pg(RICA)) were compared with those by the biochemical dextran-coated charcoal assay (PgRDCC). Comparing the two methods we found an overall agreement (accuracy) of 77.5%, a PgR(ICA) sensitivity of 83.5% and a specificity of 73%. Both methods were significantly associated with oestrogen receptor expression, detected by DCC (P less than 0.001 for PgRDCC and P = 0.0014 for PgR(ICA)). No significant association was found between PgR(ICA) or PgRDCC and the other clinicopathological features analysed. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the overall survival probability was 91% in PgRDCC-positive versus 81.5% in PgRDCC-negative patients (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.91) compared to 87.5% in PgR(ICA)-positive versus 82% in PgR(ICA)-negative ones (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.93). Disease-free survival probability was 74.5% in both PgRDCC-positive and PgRDCC-negative patients (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.02) compared to 78% in PgR(ICA)-positive versus 71.5% in PgR(ICA)-negative cases (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.37). The present study demonstrates that ICA is a reliable method to detect PgR, correlating well with the DCC assay. Moreover, the ICA assay seems to provide clinical information complementary to the biochemical method. The definition of its prognostic value in operable breast cancer needs additional studies, particularly in node-negative patients.

An immunohistochemical evaluation of progesterone receptor in frozen sections, paraffin sections, and cytologic imprints of breast carcinomas

Two monoclonal antibodies to progesterone receptor (PR), JZB39 and KD68, were used for the immunocytochemical visualization of PR in different kinds of breast cancer specimens including (1) cryostat sections of tumors frozen at -80 degrees C; (2) paraffin sections of tumors fixed in formalin or in Bouin's fixative for varying periods of time at room temperature or at 4 degrees C; and (3) imprints and cryostat sections prepared from the tissue used for frozen section diagnosis and stored at -80 degrees C after fixation in Zamboni's solution. Sections of conventionally frozen specimens as well as imprints and cryostat sections stored for varying periods of time were stained with the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique, whereas the avidin-biotin technique was used for paraffin sections. In all types of specimens the PR immunostaining was localized to the nuclei of carcinoma cells and displayed considerable heterogeneity both in intensity and in distribution of positive cells. Close correspondence was found between the different immunohistochemical techniques as well as between immunostaining and steroid-binding assays. PR staining was more frequently positive in well-differentiated than in moderately or poorly differentiated carcinomas, whereas no meaningful correlation was found between PR staining and extent of the disease. Similar results were obtained with the immunostaining of estrogen receptor in the same material using monoclonal antibodies H222 and D75P3 gamma. Thus, by choosing the technique that best suits the type of specimen available, it is possible to obtain valid information on the receptor status of any breast carcinoma, regardless of its size and clinical presentation.