Novel approaches to the endocrine therapy of breast cancer

Endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer

Endocrine therapy represents a mainstay of effective, minimally toxic, palliative treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Research focusing on the mechanism of action of endocrine agents will provide new insights leading to new hormonal approaches in breast cancer treatment. Development of new agents, especially the 'pure' antiestrogens, is of great interest. Combining endocrine therapy with biologic agents, especially antiproliferative compounds, may lead to more effective treatment in the adjuvant as well as the advanced setting. Tables 4 and 5 summarize response rates to the different groups of endocrine agents used in metastatic breast cancer and doses of commonly used agents, respectively. At present, tamoxifen is the drug of choice as first-line endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer with no or minimal symptoms in premenopausal or postmenopausal women. Second-line therapy usually consists of megace. Aromatase inhibitors may be used as second- or third-line therapy in postmenopausal women. In premenopausal women, LHRH analogues are a reasonable choice. The other hormonal agents may be beneficial as salvage therapy. More effective endocrine approaches are under development.

Toremifene. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer

The triphenylethylene antiestrogen toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of the antiestrogen tamoxifen, an agent which has been widely and successfully used in the treatment of breast cancer. Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of toremifene as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (estrogen receptor status positive or unknown) have shown this drug to have similar antitumour activity to that of tamoxifen. In multicentre comparative trials, objective responses (complete and partial) occurred in 20 to 29% of patients treated with toremifene (60 to 240 mg/day) and in 19 to 37.5% of tamoxifen (20 or 40 mg/day) recipients. The duration of response, time to disease progression and median overall survival time were generally similar in both treatment groups. Toremifene is well tolerated. Most drug-related adverse effects are mild or moderate in severity and rarely necessitate discontinuation of therapy. The tolerability profile of toremifene is similar to that reported for tamoxifen, the most common adverse effects being hot flushes, sweating, nausea and/or vomiting, dizziness, oedema, and vaginal discharge and/or bleeding. Thus, toremifene provides an equally effective and well tolerated alternative to tamoxifen for the first-line endocrine therapy of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. Preclinical studies showing toremifene to have a lower carcinogenic potential than tamoxifen indicate that toremifene may be a preferable agent for long term treatment regimens; however, these findings require confirmation in the clinical setting.

Formestane. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer

Formestane (4-hydroxyandrostenedione) is an aromatase inhibitor which significantly reduces plasma levels of estrogen and has shown antitumour activity in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Objective response rates in heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer generally range between 20 and 30% during treatment with intramuscular formestone 250 or 500mg once every 2 weeks, and a further 20 to 30% of patients experience disease stabilisation. The median duration of response is between 8 and 14 months. Highest response rates are observed in soft tissue metastases, in patients with estrogen-responsive tumours and in those showing a response to previous endocrine therapy. Furthermore, there is some evidence to suggest that higher response rates are achieved with formestane 500 versus 250mg once every 2 weeks. In comparative studies, the clinical efficacy of intramuscular formestane 250mg did not differ significantly from that of oral megestrol when administered as second-line endocrine therapy to patients with advanced disease in whom previous tamoxifen therapy had failed. In addition, formestane produced a response rate, duration of response and overall survival rate that was not significantly different from that of oral tamoxifen when administered as first-line endocrine therapy to patients with advanced disease, but tamoxifen was superior in some measures. Further investigation of these 2 agents, including the higher dosage of formestane (500mg), is necessary to confirm their relative efficacies. Formestane is well tolerated by the majority of patients; adverse events rarely necessitate cessation of therapy. The most common adverse events are local reactions at the injection site and systemic events usually related to the effect of the drug on the hormonal milieu. The systemic tolerability of formestane is similar to that of tamoxifen but better than that of megestrol. Thus, formestane is effective and well tolerated as first-line endocrine therapy for advanced disease. However, at present, it is unlikely to challenge tamoxifen in this indication, based on recent findings from a large comparative study and the fact that formestane requires intramuscular administration. Nonetheless, formestane, which appears to have a better tolerability profile than other currently available second-line agents (including megestrol and the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide), is a valuable drug for the second-line treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Development, application and comparison of an enzyme immunoassay and a high-performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of the aromatase inhibitor CGS 20,267 in biological fluids

CGS 20,267 is a new potent and selective, nonsteroidal, oral aromatase inhibitor. For its determination in human plasma and urine, an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and an HPLC method were developed. The EIA showed good precision and accuracy (intra- and interassay variation between 3.0 and 17.7%, recoveries between 81 and 106%) and a quantitation limit of 0.7 nmol/L. A strong cross reactivity of the antibodies with the hydroxy metabolite of CGS 20,267 (CGP 44,645) was observed. The HPLC method showed a quantitation limit in plasma of 28 and 34 nmol/L for CGS 20,267 and CGP 44,645, respectively. For urine, concentrations down to 180 nmol/L (CGS 20,267) and 210 nmol/L (CGP 44,645) could be measured. A cross check between EIA and HPLC on plasma samples from healthy male volunteers or breast cancer patients treated orally with CGS 20,267 revealed an excellent correlation (slope = 0.934, intercept = 26, r = 0.991). However, the EIA measurements of urine samples yielded 3-25 times higher concentrations than those obtained by HPLC. Further, HPLC analysis revealed the presence of CGS 20,267 and cross-reacting metabolites in urine but not in plasma. Therefore, the EIA can only be used for the determination of CGS 20,267 in plasma samples.

Clinical breast cancer, new developments in selection and endocrine treatment of patients

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor among women, comprising an estimated 24% of all cancer cases and 18% of all cancer deaths. At least half of the patients with primary breast cancer will ultimately die by metastatic disease. The tumor characteristics, the natural course of the disease and the response to therapy vary strongly. A number of recently detected cell biological parameters such as oncogenes/suppressor genes, growth factors and secretory proteins are more or less important prognostic factors, because they influence the characteristics and behavior of a tumor with respect to metastatic pattern, extent of cellular differentiation, growth rate and response to treatment. However, there is no clear consensus how best to identify patients at high or low risk. In our experience c-myc amplification and pS2 protein are strong prognosticators for relapse rate, while in advanced disease (apart from a negative estrogen/progesterone receptor/pS2 status) amplification of HER2/neu is a good prognosticator for failure to endocrine therapy. In the diagnosis of breast cancer, in vivo imaging of tumors by labeled hormones or other factors also forms a new development which might have implications for treatment too. With respect to treatment both endocrine and chemotherapy can cure a minority of patients with micrometastases, but in patients with advanced disease only a prolongation of (progression-free) survival can be reached. Response rates decrease with increasing tumor load. In the past decade a number of interesting new endocrine agents has been developed such as new (pure) (anti)steroidal agents, vitamins, aromatase inhibitors, analogs of peptide hormones, prolactin inhibitors and growth factor antagonists. However, less is known on the (potential) interaction between hormones, chemotherapeutic agents, retinoids, cytokins, growth factor antagonists and irradiation. Rapid detection of new powerful combination therapies are needed to improve treatment results during the nineties.

Medical management of early-stage breast cancer

With improved screening and education, a greater proportion of breast cancer is detected at an early stage. Although the prognosis for many of these patients is excellent following definitive local therapy alone, some subsets of node-negative patients have a 30% chance of eventually developing metastatic disease that will be incurable with current therapy. Thus, an increasing proportion of early-stage patients are being offered some form of adjuvant therapy, with the expectation of improved relapse-free survival, and possibly improved overall survival. Efforts have been made to base the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy on specific prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the scope and complexity of putative prognostic factors continues to widen, and now includes such items as the presence of occult microscopic metastases, DNA ploidy and proliferative fraction, cytogenetic abnormalities, oncogene expression, growth factor receptors, and expression of hormonally regulated proteins. In addition, there is now a considerable range of options with regard to the composition, dose intensity, and sequence of multimodality therapy. Data regarding the classification, significance, and interpretation of prognostic factors is reviewed together with the development, current status, and recommendations regarding adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer. For 1991, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has estimated that 175,000 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in American women. It is also estimated that 44,500 women will die of breast cancer. Unfortunately, the age-adjusted death rate from breast cancer has shown no overall change from 1930 through 1987. However, effective screening techniques continue to identify an increasing percentage of early-stage tumors, which should exceed 50% of all new tumors in 1991. Ultimately, our understanding of environmental and genetic risk factors may identify new ways to reduce the impact of this disease. In the interim, development and application of effective systemic adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy has become increasingly important. There is no question that a greater proportion of patients with less extensive disease are now being offered some form of adjuvant therapy. Meanwhile, selection of patients for adjuvant therapy, and choice among specific adjuvant regimens, has remained controversial. Analysis of multiple prognostic factors is performed not only in the context of cooperative investigational trials, but more often in the offices of individual physicians caring for individual patients. Tumor biopsies can now be routinely sent to specialized laboratories for performance of complex assays with potential prognostic information, although interpretation of these results with reference to a specific patient is often uncertain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)