Carboplatin and cyclophosphamide salvage therapy for ovarian cancer patients relapsing after cisplatin combination chemotherapy

Sustained platelet-sparing effect of weekly low dose paclitaxel allows effective, tolerable delivery of extended dose dense weekly carboplatin in platinum resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Platinum agents have shown demonstrable activity in the treatment of patients with platinum resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer when delivered in a "dose-dense" fashion. However, the development of thrombocytopenia limits the weekly administration of carboplatin to no greater than AUC 2. Paclitaxel has a well-described platelet sparing effect however its use to explicitly provide thromboprotection in the context of dose dense carboplatin has not been explored.

METHODS

We treated seven patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer who had previously received paclitaxel or who had developed significant peripheral neuropathy precluding the use of further full dose weekly paclitaxel.

RESULTS

We were able to deliver carboplatin AUC 3 and paclitaxel 20 mg/m2 with no thrombocytopenia or worsening of neuropathic side-effects, and with good activity.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that this regimen may be feasible and active, and could be formally developed as a "platinum-focussed dose-dense scaffold" into which targeted therapies that reverse platinum resistance can be incorporated, and merits further evaluation.

High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy

Because of improved therapeutic results after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may be considered for a growing number of patients. Approximately, 10% of patients have an interval time after concluding first-line platinum-based chemotherapy greater than 6 months. These patients may achieve high tumor responses when platinum is again used in second-line treatment. Twenty-three patients experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy were managed with second-line treatment with carboplatin combined with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after initiation of second-line treatment were calculated for all patients. Median PFS after first-line treatment was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.4-14.7 months). Partial response was achieved in 7 of 23 patients, resulting in an overall response of 30.4% (95% CI, 11.6-49.0). Following initiation of second-line chemotherapy, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1-10.9 months) and median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-21.5 months). The 1-year survival rate for all patients was 61.0% (95% CI, 29.5-82.0). Adding these results to those of the 10 previously published trials, 75 of 326 patients, 23%, (95% CI, 18.7-27.3) presented an overall response with the use of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of platinum combinations as second-line chemotherapy seems to have a place in the management of patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those with an interval time to progression greater than 6 months.

Extended weekly dose-dense paclitaxel/carboplatin is feasible and active in heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer

There is increasing evidence of the efficacy of dose-dense therapy in the management of platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. We report our experience of extended weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel in this population group. Twenty patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer received carboplatin AUC 3 and paclitaxel 70 mg m⁻² on day 1, 8, 15 q 4 weekly for six planned cycles. Toxicity was assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria. Response was evaluated using radiological and CA125 criteria. Median age was 61 years (range 40–74 years). Median number of prior therapies is three (range 1–8). Response rate was 60% by radiological criteria (RECIST) and 76% by CA125 assessment. Grade 3 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (29% of patients) and anaemia (5%). One patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia. No grade 3/4 thombocytopaenia was reported. Fatigue, nausea and peripheral neuropathy were the most frequent non-hematological side effects. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 months and overall survival was 13.3 months. The dynamics of response to dose-dense therapy were as rapid as with front-line therapy within the same patient. This dose-dense regimen can be extended to at least 18 weekly cycles over 6 months and is well tolerated with high response rates in heavily pre-treated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. It forms a highly active and tolerable cytotoxic scaffold to which molecular-targeted therapies can be added in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Isolated lymph node relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Relapses of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) have a poor prognosis. Isolated lymph node relapses (ILNR) are considered of relatively good prognosis with intensive therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study aimed to describe incidence, characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors of ILNR treated over 15 years.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (4.2%) experienced an ILNR among 640 patients. Median age was 59 years, tumour stages included stage I (n=4), II (n=5), III (n=15) and IV (n=3). After initial optimal treatment, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 26 months. Sites of relapse were retroperitoneum (n=15), left supraclavicular (n=7), mediastinum (n=4), iliac (n=4) and inguinal (n=3). ILNR locations were unique in 63% of patients (n=17) and multiple in 37% (n=10). Treatment modalities were surgery in eight patients (30%), chemotherapy in 15 (55%) and radiotherapy in 5 patients (18%), alone or in combination. Seven patients without tumour-related symptoms (26%) were not treated. Median overall survival (OS) after ILNR was 26 months. Median OS from initial diagnosis was 68 months. 25% of patients had a very long survival (>100 months), independent of their initial staging or PFS. There was no difference in 2-year survival after ILNR between the groups of early relapse (before 24 months) and late relapse (after 24 months). In the seven non-treated patients, median OS was 91 months.

CONCLUSION

ILNR is a rare event in EOC. Time to relapse may not have its usual prognostic value. Immediate or delayed therapy should be discussed in case of asymptomatic ILNR.

Resource utilization for ovarian cancer patients at the end of life: How much is too much?

OBJECTIVE

End-of-life (EOL) medical care consumes 10-12% of national health care expenditures and 27% of Medicare dollars annually. Studies suggest that hospice services decrease EOL expenditures by 25-40%. The goal of this study was to compare the total cost of hospital-based resources utilized in ovarian cancer patients during their last 60 days of life for those enrolled in hospice versus those not on hospice.

METHODS

Study eligibility included patients who expired from ovarian cancer from 1999 to 2003. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as treatment, response and recurrence rates, histologic type, grade and stage. Billing records were analyzed for costs of inpatient and outpatients visits, including radiologic, laboratory and pharmacy charges. Total cost of hospital resources was compared between patients managed on hospice for >10 days (hospice group) versus <10 days (non-hospice group) using the following methods: Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis and Student's t tests. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients analyzed, 67 (79.8%) were in the non-hospice group and 17 (20.2%) were in the hospice group. Demographic, histologic and staging characteristics as well as platinum sensitivity were similar between the two groups before the last 60 days of life. Mean number of chemotherapy cycles before the study period was also similar (20.4 and 21.0, respectively). However, during the study period, the mean total cost per patient in the non-hospice group was dollar 59,319 versus dollar 15,164 in the hospice group (P = 0.0001). A significant difference in cost was noted for mean inpatient days (dollar 6584 vs. dollar 1629, P = 0.0007), radiology (dollar 6063 vs. dollar 2343, P = 0.003), laboratory (dollar 12,281 vs. dollar 2026, P = 0.0004) and pharmacy charges (dollar 13,650 vs. dollar 4465, P = 0.0017) as well as for treating physician per patient (dollar 112,707 vs. dollar 34,677, P = 0.04). Overall survival for the two groups was the same.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that there is a significant cost difference with no appreciable improvement in survival between ovarian cancer patients treated aggressively versus those enrolled in hospice at the EOL. These data suggest that earlier hospice enrollment is beneficial. Furthermore, cost variations between physicians and patients imply that education may be an important variable.

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus carboplatin in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Gemcitabine and carboplatin each have demonstrated effectiveness without increased neurotoxicity in pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in a multicenter phase II study.

METHODS

Women with histologically proven measurable or evaluable epithelial ovarian cancer (any FIGO) who relapsed > or =6 months after discontinuation of first-line, platinum-containing therapy received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 (after gemcitabine) every 21 days for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Of the 40 enrolled/evaluable patients, 6 (15%) had complete response and 19 (47.5%) had partial response (PR), including one patient with PR in nonmeasurable disease (PRNM), for an overall response rate of 62.5% (95% CI, 45.8-77.3%). The median duration of response was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-10.0), the median time to progressive disease was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.5-11.0), and the median time to treatment failure was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.2-10.4). The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (78% of patients), leukopenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (18%), and anemia (15%); no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities occurred, and grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is active and feasible in platinum-sensitive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. This regimen is undergoing further evaluation in a large phase III trial.

Dose-dense cisplatin/paclitaxel. a well-tolerated and highly effective chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

A randomised phase I/II trial with weekly cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43) in combination with escalating doses of paclitaxel either 4-weekly or weekly was conducted in 49 patients with ovarian cancer; patients were chemotherapy-nai;ve or had a first relapse after platinum-based chemotherapy. Paclitaxel could be safely escalated to 225 mg/m(2) 4-weekly or 100 mg/m(2) weekly, with fatigue as the major adverse event. Myelosuppression, renal toxicity and neurotoxicity were mild to moderate. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed an approximately 2-fold reduction of DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes compared with cisplatin without paclitaxel. No pharmacokinetic interaction was found between paclitaxel and cisplatin. After (re-)induction, additional chemotherapy consisted of conventional paclitaxel/cisplatin, paclitaxel/carboplatin, paclitaxel single agent or carboplatin/cyclophosphamide. The overall response rate was 94% in 17 evaluable chemotherapy-nai;ve patients and 84% in 25 patients with recurrent disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months (chemotherapy-nai;ve: 23 months, recurrent: 11 months) and median overall survival was 41 months (chemotherapy-nai;ve: 48 months, recurrent: 24 months). In conclusion, both cisplatin/paclitaxel regimens showed excellent activity with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Weekly cisplatin and daily oral etoposide is highly effective in platinum pretreated ovarian cancer

We investigated the potential of weekly cisplatin and daily oral etoposide followed by oral etoposide maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-refractory ovarium cancer. One hundred and seven patients were entered on the study, 98 patients completed the induction therapy consisting of cisplatin at either 50 or 70 mg m(-2) weekly for six administrations plus oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg daily. Of these 98 patients, 38 had a platinum treatment-free interval of more than 12 months, 32 had an interval between 4 and 12 months, and 28 had progressed during or within 4 months after last platinum therapy. We assessed response rates and time to progression, and also response duration and survival. Analyses were done on the 98 evaluable patients. All 107 patients were considered evaluable for toxicity. Of the 38 patients with a treatment-free interval of more than 12 months, 92% responded, with 63% complete responses. The median progression-free survival in these patients was 14 months, and the median survival was 26 months. Of the 32 patients with an interval of 4-12 months, 91% responded, with 31% complete responses, a median progression-free interval of 8 and a median overall survival of 16 months. Of the 28 patients with platinum-refractory disease, 46% as yet responded, with 29% complete responses, median progression-free interval of 5 and an overall survival of 13 months. Haematologic and non-haematologic, particularly renal toxicity and neurotoxicity, were notably mild. We conclude that this intensive regimen of weekly cisplatin plus daily etoposide is highly effective and well tolerated in patients with ovarian cancer relapsing after conventional platinum-based combination chemotherapy, including patients who have progressed during or within 4 months after platinum treatment.

Second-line carboplatin and gemcitabine in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer--a dose-finding study by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Ovarian Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND

Despite the progress that has been achieved in the last years, recurrence rates in ovarian cancer patients are still considerably high and the majority of patients ultimately become candidates for second-line treatment. Carboplatin reinduction is a broadly adopted regimen in patients with recurrences occurring six months or later after first-line treatment. Gemcitabine is among the candidates as combination partner in second-line regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a study with escalating doses of gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in 26 platinum-pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and a treatment-free interval of 6+ months. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and a maximum tolerable dose (MTD) recommendable for further trials was evaluated.

RESULTS

The DLT was myelosuppression, mainly thrombocytopenia. No dose limiting non-hematological toxicities were observed. The MTD of gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m2 given on days 1 + 8 of a three-week schedule combined with carboplatin AUC 4 given on day 1. The majority of evaluable patients showed an objective response (62.5%), and median progression-free and overall survival were 10 and 18+ months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine-carboplatin given according to the MTD is well tolerated and active against recurrent platinum-sensitive disease. A randomized trial comparing carboplatin with or without gemcitabine in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer has already been initiated.

Phase II study of vinorelbine in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate on an intent-to-treat basis the activity and toxicity of single-agent vinorelbine (VRL) as second-line chemotherapy of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Platinum-resistant disease was defined as disease refractory to or relapsing within 12 months after finishing platinum-containing chemotherapy.

METHODS

VRL (30 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously as a bolus injection days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Initially, four courses of VRL were given. Patients with responding or stable disease received four more courses of VRL to a maximum of eight courses.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 33 eligible patients were considered evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 21% (7/33) (95% CI: 7--35). Median time to progression was 3.1 months and median survival was 10.1 months. Toxicity was generally mild. Leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. CALGB grade III/IV infection was observed in 15/0% of patients. The most important nonhematologic toxicities were nausea and constipation. Grade III/IV nausea was observed in 6/0% and grade III/IV constipation in 3/3% of patients. Peripheral neurotoxicity was only a minor problem with no grade III/IV toxicity. No patients stopped treatment because of toxicity and no toxic death was reported.

CONCLUSION

VRL was generally well tolerated, but the activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer was only modest, although fully comparable to other second-line treatments. Further studies are required to define the role of VRL in combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The value of palliative chemotherapy in women with refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer is difficult to quantify, and little is known about patient expectations from these treatments. We evaluated in the current prospective study patient expectations, palliative outcomes of chemotherapy, and the inherent resource utilization in patients undergoing second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaires were used to assess palliative benefit and an in-house questionnaire was used to gauge patient expectations. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated by asking women to make a global rating of change and correlating this to the EORTC QLQ C30. Resource use was recorded and costs were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were accrued. Objective response was documented on seven of 27. The median survival was 11 months. Sixty-five percent of women expected that chemotherapy would make them live longer and 42% that it would cure them. After two cycles, quality-of-life (QL) improvement was seen particularly in global function (11 of 21) and emotional function (13 of 21) with EORTC QLQ C-30. Improvement was sustained for a median of 2 and 3 months, respectively, in these categories. The MCID was calculated to be 0.39 on a seven-point scale for physical function and 0.13 for global function. The mean total cost per patient for the study period was Can $12,500.

CONCLUSION

Patient expectations from these treatments are often unrealistic. Although objective responses are low, active palliation with chemotherapy is associated with substantive improvement in patients' emotional function and global QL, with overall costs that seem relatively modest.

Chemotherapy in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): an analysis of prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

Prognosis of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is generally poor. Cisplatin is the most effective drug. We used three cisplatin based chemotherapeutic (CT) regimens and retrospectively analyzed the data to determine the response rate, toxicity, survival and the impact of various prognostic factors on the outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August, 1989 and September, 1997, 102 patients were diagnosed to have recurrent EOC. Sixty-five of 102 patients received CT every 3 weeks using cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 plus cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 (CP, Group A, n = 29), cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, plus adriamycin 40 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and cyclophosphamide (CAP, Group B, n = 22) and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 (TP, Group C, n = 14). Twelve patients received single agent CT and were not analyzed. Remaining 25 patients refused CT treatment and were followed for survival.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (complete and partial) was 59.2% for patients receiving CP (Group A), 45% for CAP (Group B) and 76.9% for those receiving TP (Group C), p = ns. Response rate was significantly higher for patients with platinum sensitive disease compared to those with platinum resistant disease; 55.76 vs 39%, p < 0.007. CT was generally tolerated well; 2 patients died of CT toxicity, one each in Group A (CP) and C (TP), respectively. The median survival from the date of relapse for patients receiving chemotherapy was 15 months compared to 4 months for those who did not receive chemotherapy, p < 0.001. Chemotherapy responders had a significantly higher median survival than chemotherapy non-responders, 24 months vs 10 months, p < 0.01. The median overall survival was not significantly different in the 3 groups; Group A--15 months, Group B--12 months and 15 months in Group C, p = 0.738. On univariate analysis--time since last CT (< 6 months vs > 6 months, p < 0.037, response to previous CT, p < 0.0183, cisplatinum sensitivity vs resistance, p < 0.032, number of sites (< 2 vs > 2) of recurrence, p < 0.004 and response to salvage CT, p < 0.01 were associated with survival benefit. On multivariate analysis, 2 factors--platinum sensitivity and response to salvage CT attained significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the benefit of platinum based chemotherapy in recurrent EOC. Patients with platinum sensitive disease, and those responding to salvage chemotherapy benefit most.

Phase II trial of high-dose cisplatin plus ifosfamide as first-line followed by carboplatin as second-line treatment in epithelial ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In a previous study of combined platinum and ifosfamide we found a pathologic complete response rate of 42%. The present study was to test whether the high response rate could be reproduced or even improved by combining high-dose cis-platinum and increased dose of ifosfamide.

METHODS

Forty-two previously untreated ovarian cancer patients were included in the study. Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 2000 mg/m2 together with mesna 1200 mg/m2 were given daily, Day 1-3 every 4 weeks for six cycles, followed by second-look laparotomy. In the event of residual disease carboplatin was given every 4 weeks for a further six cycles.

RESULTS

The pathologic complete response rate was 20% (8 of 41). Five of 26 patients achieved a further response on carboplatin. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity caused dose reduction in more than 90 and 50% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this high-dose regimen equals those obtained with conventional, far less toxic, regimens. Only patients with potentially platinum-sensitive tumors achieved further response when crossed over to the analogue, which may indicate that prolonged treatment is better than increased dose. A randomized trial is still needed to assess the importance of dose intensity in ovarian cancer.

Phase II study of pirarubicin combined with cisplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer

Although 50%-80% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer demonstrate an objective response after platinum-based chemotherapy, a majority of these patients will ultimately experience a relapse of their disease. Effective second-line treatment for these patients is of the most importance. We performed a phase II study with cisplatin and pirarubicin (each drug 50 mg/m2 i.v. every 28 days) in 17 patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian carcinoma. All patients had received platinum-containing primary chemotherapy. Overall survival from the time of diagnosis was 38.3 months (45.3 months in relapsed ovarian carcinoma and 28.3 months in ovarian carcinoma persisting after primary chemotherapy). Survival from entrance into the study was 13.0 months (14.2 months in relapsed disease and 11.2 months in refractory disease). Time to progression was 10.3 months. An objective response was observed in 4 patients and another 3 patients had stable disease. Major toxicity consisted of emesis (grade III/IV in 60/64 courses) and myelosuppression WHO grade III/IV in 15 courses. Neurotoxicity occurred in 3 patients and nephrotoxicity in 1 patient. Alopecia occurred in 12 patients. Tachycardia and other low-grade heart toxicities were observed after 5 courses. Dose reduction was necessary because of severe myelosuppression in 4 courses and because of nephrotoxicity in 1 course. Delay of subsequent chemotherapy courses for more than 7 days was necessary after 13 courses and was always due to myelosuppression. The dose-limiting toxicity of combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and pirarubicin is myelosuppression. Response and survival rates are superior in patients with relapsed disease compared to patients with resistant ovarian carcinoma.

Second-line treatment with ifosfamide and carboplatin in patients with ovarian carcinoma relapsing after treatment with carboplatin

20 patients with ovarian carcinoma whose disease had relapsed (1-42 months, median 4 months) after showing either response or stable disease to carboplatin, were treated with ifosfamide (5 g/m2 intravenously over 24 h, day 1) and carboplatin (200 mg/m2 intravenously day 2) as second-line treatment. The mean number of treatment cycles was 3.5 (range 1-6). The major toxicities were thrombocytopenia (WHO grade 3/4, 25%), neutropenia (WHO grade 3/4, 40%) and encephalopathy (WHO grade 3/4, 15%). Overall response rate was 15% [complete response, 0; partial response, 3 (15%); no change, 5 (25%) and progressive disease, 12 (60%)]. The median survival from the date of second-line treatment was 7 months. This combination offers no advantage over either agent used alone.

Response to second-line weekly cisplatin chemotherapy in ovarian cancer previously treated with a cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimen

Response to a second-line weekly cisplatin chemotherapy in ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens was analysed in a clinical series observed between 1984 and 1991. Women who achieved pathological complete response or pathological optimal partial remission after first-line cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens were treated at recurrence or progression, occurring at least 4 months after first-line treatment, with second-line chemotherapy. A total of 72 women were included in the analysis. Second-line chemotherapy regimens were: cisplatin 1 mg/kg weekly for seven courses plus epirubicin 70 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks for three courses (28 subjects), cisplatin 1 mg/kg plus etoposide 90 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for a total of seven courses (11 subjects) and cisplatin 1 mg/kg weekly for nine courses plus carboplatin 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for three courses (33 subjects). Of the 72 women, 22 (31%, 14 clinical, 8 pathological) had a complete response and 28 (39%), a partial response (24 clinical, 4 pathological). The 24-month cumulative survival probability was 63% in women with complete response, 32% in those who had partial response, but all the 22 non-responders died within 24 months from diagnosis of recurrence (log rank test P < 0.05). The frequency of complete response and partial response increased with the interval between first diagnosis and recurrence: among the 33 women who had recurrent disease to < 18 months from first diagnosis, complete response or partial response was obtained in 20 (61%) subjects, this figure was 67% (14 out of 21 women) among subjects who had recurrent disease between 18 and < 36 months from first diagnosis and 89% (16/18) among those who had recurrence > or = 36 months. In comparison with women who had recurrence 4- < 18 months from first diagnosis, the OR of response was 1.3 (95% CI 0.4-4.1) for those who had recurrence between 18 and < 36 and 5.2 (95% CI 1.1-24.3) for those who had recurrence > or = 36 months from surgery (chi 1(2) trend p < 0.05). Survival rate after the end of second line chemotherapy for women who relapsed 4- < 18 months, 18- < 36 or 36 months or more after surgery were, respectively, 24, 20 and 67% (log rank test, P < 0.05). Age at first diagnosis, histology, stage, and grading of the disease at first diagnosis and site of recurrence were not associated with response to second-line therapy.

Second-line chemotherapy for recurrent carcinoma of the ovary

Despite relatively high response rates to chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma, most patients eventually will have progressive disease that will require additional therapy. Most efforts to study such second-line or "salvage" chemotherapy have been single-arm trials of small numbers of patients, which report widely variable response rates, relatively short response durations, and short survival times. Only recently have certain critical patient characteristics been recognized as important in determining appropriate therapy as follows: (1) the extent and volume of disease at recurrence and (2) the type and duration of response to prior chemotherapy. Patients with small-volume disease confined to the peritoneal cavity have a far better chance of achieving a response to second-line chemotherapy with subsequent prolonged survival than do those with bulky disease or disease outside the abdomen. Perhaps even more critical is the distinction between those patients whose neoplasm is still "clinically sensitive" to the platinum-containing compounds (initial response to platinum-based therapy and relapse more than 6 months after cessation of treatment) and those with "clinically resistant" disease (progression during or within 6 months of front-line platinum-based therapy). Those considered clinically sensitive to platinum-based therapy should be retreated with a platinum-containing regimen at the time of recurrence. Those with evidence for resistance should receive alternative treatment with one or more drugs capable of inducing responses in such patients. These drugs currently include: taxol, ifosfamide, and hexamethylmelamine.

A phase II study of carboplatin and cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian carcinoma

Forty-two patients affected by either stage III and IV ovarian cancer with residual tumor after surgery or recurrent ovarian cancer entered a phase II study of the combination carboplatin 300 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 28 days. Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for response and of these 27 obtained complete or partial remission with a 71% overall remission (clinical complete remission 45%; partial remission 26%). Treatment tolerability was on the whole good. The most frequent side effects were leukopenia (76%), anemia (67%) and nausea/vomiting (60%). Thrombocytopenia was present in 31% of the patients, but nearly always to a mild degree except for one grade 4 case. No other grade 4 side effect was observed. We did not observe any cases of nephrotoxicity and only two patients complained of paresthesia. This carboplatin-cyclophosphamide combination in advanced ovarian carcinoma produces comparable results, in terms of objective responses, to those obtained with standard cisplatin-based regimens, with suggestion of a better toxicological profile.