Obstetrical attitudes and practices before and after the Canadian Consensus Conference Statement on Cesarean Birth

Application of standard treatment guidelines in rural community health centres, Timor-Leste

OBJECTIVE

To analyse nurses' and midwives' knowledge of and attitudes towards standard treatment guidelines (STGs), which were developed to help their practices at rural community health centres (CHCs) in Timor-Leste.

METHODS

Fifty-five nurses and midwives were individually interviewed. Data were analysed qualitatively using the Framework approach.

RESULTS

Overall, the standard treatments for acute respiratory tract infections, malaria and diarrhoea were well known by the respondents. Clinical nurses showed precise and detailed knowledge, especially for antibiotic use. The respondents were willing to use STGs and believed that they 'should' follow them. This feeling arose due to their self-awareness as frontline health workers and, at the same time, as peripheral civil servants. The changes brought about by the introduction of STGs were positively perceived. Three components of the change were observed: the concept, daily practice and perceived patient satisfaction. The respondents had previously felt a lack of confidence and hoped to improve their capacity as health care workers; they became confident in their practices by using STGs. Self-confidence was identified more clearly in the clinical nurse interviews. Few difficulties in using STGs were indicated, and the respondents suggested ways to deal with these difficulties.

DISCUSSION

By using the STGs, the nurses/midwives gained knowledge and self-confidence. The positive perception of the changes promoted further use of the STGs. Clinical nurse training positively influenced the knowledge of and attitudes towards the STGs. Few difficulties in applying STGs in daily practice were identified, which is contrary to previous studies that targeted physicians in the Western world. Development of STGs within a health policy framework was considered a key factor. The STGs exist across related policies and various programmes, which are interconnected. The Timor-Leste experience indicates the value of STGs for non-physician health care providers at the primary health care level.

The term breech presentation: Neonatal results and obstetric practices in France

OBJECTIVE

Compare neonatal complications according to the planned mode of delivery and according to whether the women gave birth at a maternity unit that applied "consensus" guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN

The study used the database of the AUDIPOG Sentinel Network (n=71,919 pregnancies between 1994 and 2000). The principal outcome was a composite variable that included neonatal morbidity and mortality. A survey of obstetric practices was sent to 175 maternity units belonging to the network. Consensus guidelines were defined from the survey responses and taken into account in the database analysis.

RESULTS

Neonatal complications did not differ between the group of women with term babies in breech presentation for whom vaginal delivery was planned and those for whom an elective caesarean was planned (adjusted OR=1.33; 95% CI: 0.63-2.80). The survey allowed us to define a set of six criteria for deciding on mode of delivery; it established a consensus, followed by 42% of the maternity units in the study. The rate of neonatal complications among the women with planned vaginal delivery was lower for those giving birth in units that applied the consensus guidelines than among those in the other units: adjusted OR=0.27 (95% CI: 0.09-0.85).

CONCLUSION

The risk of neonatal morbidity according to planned mode of delivery for term breech babies was lower for those giving birth in units that applied the consensus guidelines than among those in the other units.

Publishing web-based guidelines using interactive decision models

Commonly used methods for guideline development and dissemination do not enable developers to tailor guidelines systematically to specific patient populations and update guidelines easily. We developed a web-based system, ALCHEMIST, that uses decision models and automatically creates evidence-based guidelines that can be disseminated, tailored and updated over the web. Our objective was to demonstrate the use of this system with clinical scenarios that provide challenges for guideline development. We used the ALCHEMIST system to develop guidelines for three clinical scenarios: (1) Chlamydia screening for adolescent women, (2) antiarrhythmic therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death; and (3) genetic testing for the BRCA breast-cancer mutation. ALCHEMIST uses information extracted directly from the decision model, combined with the additional information from the author of the decision model, to generate global guidelines. ALCHEMIST generated electronic web-based guidelines for each of the three scenarios. Using ALCHEMIST, we demonstrate that tailoring a guideline for a population at high-risk for Chlamydia changes the recommended policy for control of Chlamydia from contact tracing of reported cases to a population-based screening programme. We used ALCHEMIST to incorporate new evidence about the effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and demonstrate that the cost-effectiveness of use of ICDs improves from $74 400 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained to $34 500 per QALY gained. Finally, we demonstrate how a clinician could use ALCHEMIST to incorporate a woman's utilities for relevant health states and thereby develop patient-specific recommendations for BRCA testing; the patient-specific recommendation improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by 37 days. The ALCHEMIST system enables guideline developers to publish both a guideline and an interactive decision model on the web. This web-based tool enables guideline developers to tailor guidelines systematically, to update guidelines easily, and to make the underlying evidence and analysis transparent for users.

The effect of the ACOG guideline on vaginal births after cesarean

In October 1988, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a physician practice guideline stating that a prior cesarean section is no longer a reason for performing a repeat C-section. Using a panel data set consisting of 55 Massachusetts hospitals over the years 1987 to 1991, this study examines if the ACOG guideline had any impact on the practice of vaginal births after cesarean (VBACs) at the typical hospital. The empirical results suggest that the ACOG guideline led to a permanent 5.6 percentage point increase in the VBAC rate, ceteris paribus. As a result, the study suggests that practice guidelines do sometimes work. The information dissemination role of the popular press may provide the reason why the AGOG guideline influenced the practice of VBACs.

The Dutch obstetric intervention study--variations in practice patterns

OBJECTIVE

To compare obstetric intervention rates between Dutch hospitals.

METHODS

A total of 28,934 hospital births under secondary care (specialist care for medium-/high-risk pregnancies) in 1990 were analyzed in a stratified, random sample of Dutch hospitals based on the records of the Dutch Netherlands perinatal database. Comparisons were made of the intervention rates between hospitals.

RESULTS

The intervention rates of the various hospitals differed widely. The most striking difference was in the cesarean section (CS) rate for non-vertex first twins, with a range of 0-100% and a mean rate of 47.6%. On average a CS for a term breech was performed in 30.8% of cases and sedation or analgesics were administered in 16.2% of cases. The mean rate of episiotomy for a term breech was 71.5%, the lowest rate being 18.8%.

CONCLUSION

Our results show relatively low intervention rates with considerable interhospital variation.

The adoption of preventive care practice guidelines by primary care physicians: do actions match intentions?

OBJECTIVE

To measure primary care physicians' familiarity with, attitudes toward, and confidence in preventive care practice guidelines for the elderly and to determine whether their attitudes are associated with implementation of guidelines into clinical practice.

DESIGN

A self-administered survey of physicians employed by a health maintenance organization (HMO) and of patients cared for by those physicians. Medical records were also reviewed to assess compliance with practice guidelines.

SETTING

An HMO in Southern California.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-eight primary care physicians completed the survey (100% response rate). The medical records of 3,249 randomly selected elderly patients (65 to 75 years old) were studied. Of these patients, 2,799 completed a preventive care survey (response rate 86.1%).

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Most HMO primary care physicians agreed or strongly agreed that guidelines will improve quality of medical care (88%) and that guidelines have caused them to change their care of patients (73%). Although the physicians' general attitudes about guidelines did not often correlate with their use of preventive care guidelines, the physicians who stated that practice guidelines had changed their practices were more likely to offer their patients clinical breast examinations (75.9% vs 67.2%, p = 0.04) and to counsel their patients to exercise (70% vs 58%, p = 0.01) than were the physicians who did not. There was a significant association between physicians' support for and adoption of specific practice guidelines regarding mammography (r = 0.34, p = 0.02) and immunizations against influenza (r = 0.42, p < 0.005), pneumococcal pneumonia (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), and tetanus (r = 0.31, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians employed by an HMO were familiar with and hopeful about the role of guidelines for improving patient care. Physicians' attitudes toward specific preventive care guidelines and admission that guidelines had caused them to change their practice did at times, but not always, correlate with their implementation of guidelines into clinical practice.

Controversies in maternity care: where do physicians, nurses, and midwives stand?

Through a mail survey in 1991, we compared the opinions of 597 physicians practicing obstetrics, 723 maternity care nurses, and 70 midwives from the province of Quebec, Canada, about selected maternity care issues, including the practice of midwifery. Results showed that divergent points of view existed between and within the three groups on many maternity care issues. Physicians were more divided over the routine use of obstetric intervention than the approach to care or their opinion about midwives. Midwives held more client-centered and less interventionist attitudes than nurses or physicians. Nurses were much more open to midwives than physicians, but 20 to 30 percent of physicians saw some advantages in legalizing the practice of midwifery. Physicians and nurses generally considered midwives as a greater professional threat to the other group than to themselves. The fact that many physicians were critical of current maternity care is difficult to reconcile with their general opposition to midwives. How and to what extent physicians will respond to women's desire for more humanized and less interventionist care remains an open question. Given the problems facing maternity care in North America, expanding midwifery services is an alternative to examine seriously.

Medically unnecessary cesarean section births: introduction to a symposium

Between 1965 and 1986, the United States cesarean section rate increased from 4.5 to 24.1%. Increasingly, childbearing women and their advocates, along with many others, have recognized that a large proportion of cesareans confers a broad array of risks without providing any medical benefit. A growing literature examines the diverse causes of medically unnecessary cesareans and the diverse effects of surgical birth on women, infants, and families. Various programs and policies have been proposed or implemented to reduce cesarean rates. In recent decades, many other nations have also experienced a sharply escalating cesarean section rate. It is reasonable to conclude that a largely uncontrolled international pandemic of medically unnecessary cesarean births is occurring. The level of political, analytic, and programmatic activity that has occurred in the U.S. regarding medically unnecessary surgical births does not seem to be paralleled in other nations with sharply escalating rates. This symposium was organized with the objective of presenting the U.S. experience with various dimensions of the problem of medically unnecessary cesareans to an international audience. Although preliminary and inadequate, it is hoped that this experience will encourage policy leaders and investigators throughout the world to recognize and address the problem of run-away cesarean section births. The first section of this introduction summarizes the U.S. experience with medically unnecessary cesareans from the perspective of trends, causes, consequences, and solutions. The second section covers the same topics, presenting selected material from various other nations throughout the world. In the course of these overviews, I introduce the symposium's seven contributions, most of which focus on circumstances in the U.S.

Making clinical policy explicit. Legislative policy making and lessons for developing practice guidelines

Promulgation of practice guidelines in medicine has increased interest in the structure of clinical policy making. It is argued that with a generic definition of policy as "the rules governing the behavior of individuals or institutions," clinical policy making is analogous to legislative policy making. Practice guidelines emphasize the advantages of making clinical policy more explicit. The structure of legislative policy making has evolved over many years to meet the challenge of making both the policies and the process of policy making explicit. Processes to promulgate clinical policies may be able to exploit this experience to improve clinical policy making and thereby retain control of the process within medicine. Generic steps are outlined for making decisions with incomplete information; synthesis of facts, vested interests, and values; involvement of stakeholders; and implementation of policy. An illustration of the use of the generic steps to make and implement a clinical policy for cesarean birth follows, with evaluations of its impact on the behavior and satisfaction of clinical stakeholders.