Comparison of sublingual lorazepam with intramuscular diazepam as sedatives during oral surgery

Evaluation of the sedative effect of sublingual lorazepam versus placebo in patients underwent endoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Digestive endoscopy (DE) is uncomfortable for most patients. Lorazepam is a potent benzodiazepine with anxiolytic and sedative effects.

Objective

This study aims to determine the sedative effect of sublingual lorazepam versus placebo as a premedication in patients who underwent DE.

Design

This is a mono-center, double-blind, and randomized controlled trial.

Methods

A lorazepam sublingual tablet was made by researchers and physical tests were done on it, then the double-blind placebo-controlled trial was done to investigate the efficacy of 2 mg sublingually administered lorazepam as a premedication for endoscopy. Lorazepam or a placebo tablet was administered sublingually 30 min before the endoscopy. The patients, nurses, and physicians were blinded to the patient group. The depth of sedation was evaluated according to the American Society of Anesthesiology.

Results

In all, 116 patients were randomly assigned to take either lorazepam (n = 58) or a placebo (n = 58). The results of physical properties tests were acceptable according to United States Pharmacopeia. There were no statistical differences between groups regarding age and gender. In the lorazepam group, 75.8% of patients showed mild sedation, and 24.2% of patients showed no sedation. All of the patients in the placebo had no sedation (p = 0.001). Time of procedure (p < 0.001), intraoperative O2 saturation (p < 0.001), intraoperative heart rate (p < 0.001), and intraoperative blood pressure (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the lorazepam group. No significant or dangerous side effects were observed except a bit of giddiness and dizziness.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that prescription of sublingual lorazepam 25-30 min before endoscopy provided mild sedation.

Registration

IRCT201611039014N130 (05/11/2016); https://en.irct.ir/trial/9568.

A double-blind comparison of lorazepam and oxazepam in psychomotor retardation and mutism

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of case reports indicate a superior therapeutic response of catatonialike symptoms, such as severe psychomotor disturbance and mutism, associated with psychiatric disorder to the benzodiazepine lorazepam (LO). Equivocal results, however, are also reported with regard to other benzodiazepines for the treatment of this syndrome. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LO and oxazepam (OX), benzodiazepines with comparable pharmacokinetics, on psychomotor retardation and mutism associated with psychiatric disorder.

METHODS

Twenty-one hospitalized patients with severe psychomotor retardation and mutism were treated with 2 mg LO and 60 mg OX in a double-blind crossover study design.

RESULTS

Both benzodiazepines significantly reduced psychomotor symptoms. When administered for the first time, 4 of 7 patients with LO and 6 of 10 patients with OX improved at least 50% on visual analog scale (VAS) rating. Reduction in symptoms was significant with LO and OX treatment on either day of treatment. The second time, however, LO was significantly better compared with OX in alleviating the target symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Both OX and LO are effective for the treatment of psychomotor retardation. Thus, the beneficial effect of LO on psychomotor retardation and mutism is not a unique pharmacodynamic property but more likely due to its pharmacokinetic profile. The differential effect of the two benzodiazepines on the second day of treatment warrants further clarification. Several hypotheses are evaluated.

Comparative permeability of human vaginal and buccal mucosa to water

There is currently a resurgence of interest in the oral mucosa as a route for drug delivery. The relative scarcity of human oral mucosa for in vitro permeability studies, and the fact that vaginal mucosa is histologically similar and more abundant than the former, caused us to compare these 2 tissues with respect to their barrier properties to water. Specimens of fresh, clinically-healthy human vaginal and buccal mucosa from non-smokers were taken from excised tissue obtained during vaginal hysterectomies and various oral surgical procedures. Biopsies from each specimen were mounted in flow-through diffusion cells and their permeability to tritiated water determined using a continuous flow-through perfusion system. Specimens were examined histologically before and after permeability experiments and similarities between vaginal and buccal tissues verified. No statistically significant differences between mean steady state flux values (10-16 h) for vaginal and buccal mucosa, respectively, were found. Human vaginal mucosa is therefore as permeable as buccal mucosa to water, and these results warrant further investigation with other compounds to establish whether vaginal mucosa may be a useful model for buccal mucosa for drug permeability studies.

Cardiac dysrhythmias associated with intravenous lorazepam, diazepam, and midazolam during oral surgery

The incidence and nature of cardiac dysrhythmias occurring during intravenous sedation with lorazepam, diazepam, and midazolam for oral surgery were studied. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I patients of both sexes between the ages 17 and 32 years were randomly allocated to three groups. Groups received either intravenous lorazepam (.05 mg/kg), diazepam (.25 mg/kg), or midazolam (.1 mg/kg) prior to the oral surgical procedure. Electrocardiograms were made before medication and thereafter throughout the entire procedure. Of the 60 patients studied, 16 (26.7%) exhibited dysrhythmias during the surgical procedure. If sinus dysrhythmias were excluded as a cause of abnormal rhythms, only six patients (10%) exhibited dysrhythmias during surgery. No atrial or ventricular premature beats were recorded for the lorazepam group. In the diazepam group five of the patients (25%) exhibited dysrhythmias; 15% were mainly unifocal ventricular premature beats. Only one patient in the midazolam group exhibited unifocal ventricular premature beats.

Comparison of various physiologic and psychomotor parameters in patients sedated with intravenous lorazepam, diazepam, or midazolam during oral surgery

Intravenously administered lorazepam (0.05 mg/kg), diazepam (0.25 mg/kg), and midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) were compared for sedation during oral surgery under local anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated into three groups in this double-blind, parallel study. The results from this trial show that all three drugs provide satisfactory sedation. Average mean arterial pressures, however, decreased significantly with midazolam and diazepam. Statistically significantly higher heart rates during the entire procedure were also found for lorazepam when compared with diazepam and midazolam. At the postblock stage, the midazolam group had respiratory rates that were significantly higher than those of the other two drug groups. Patients in the diazepam and midazolam groups took significantly longer to complete the pegboard test at the preblock stage than those in the lorzepam group. At 1, 1.5, and 2 hours after arrival in the recovery room, an inversion of groups took place, with the lorazepam group taking significantly longer for their tests than the other two groups. Significantly more improvement in anxiety levels was found at 10 minutes postdrug for the patients who had received diazepam and this tended to remain so on arrival in the recovery room. When compared with the other two groups, significantly more patients in the lorazepam group reported giddiness/dizziness and significantly more in the diazepam group reported pain on injection.

Disinhibitory reactions to benzodiazepines: a review

This article reviews some of the important aspects of benzodiazepine-induced disinhibitory reactions. Although reactions of this type are relatively rare, they may sometimes manifest themselves in aggressive behavior accompanied by suicidal or homicidal tendencies. It appears that these reactions occur more commonly in younger patients, although the elderly (above 65 years) may also be at risk. Many mechanisms have been postulated, but none truly explain how these reactions arise. The concept that central cholinergic mechanisms may play a role, however, remains attractive and stems primarily from physostigmine's ability to successfully reverse this type of reaction. The potential role of the benzodiazepine antagonists, eg, flumazenil, in reversing disinhibitory reactions is also discussed. Apart from patients who previously exhibited poor impulse control, there are no reliable indicators for recognizing potential candidates for this type of reaction. To minimize the occurrence of disinhibitory reactions, some guidelines, which include the avoidance of certain drug combinations, the use of low doses of benzodiazepines, slow incremental intravenous administration, and good rapport with patients, are presented.

Preanesthetic medication with rectal midazolam in children undergoing dental extractions

Three different dosages (0.25, 0.35, and 0.45 mg/kg) of rectally administered midazolam were compared with each other and with placebo for preanesthetic medication in children undergoing dental extractions. Eighty patients between the ages of 2 and 10 years were randomly allocated into four groups in this double-blind study. The results from this trial show that 30 minutes after rectal administration of all doses of midazolam, good anxiolysis, sedation, and cooperation were obtained in most patients. A high prevalence (23%) of disinhibition reactions was observed, particularly in the 0.45 mg/kg group. For this reason, 0.25 or 0.35 mg/kg appears to be the dose of choice when rectal midazolam is used for premedication in children.

Paradoxical reactions to rectal midazolam as premedication in children

Eighty healthy children, between the ages of 2 and 7 years, who were to undergo oral surgical procedures under general anaesthesia, were allocated randomly to 4 groups. Three groups received rectal midazolam, and the other group a placebo (saline) as premedication 30 min prior to induction of anaesthesia. Group A children received midazolam 0.25 mg/kg, Group B 0.35 mg/kg and Group C 0.45 mg/kg. No statistically significant difference was found between the treatment groups as to the effect on systolic- (p = 0.6920) and diastolic (p = 0.8701) blood pressures, respiration (p = 0.0505) and pulse (p = 0.6192) rates at either pre- or post-sedation levels. However, the results indicate that levels of anxiolysis and sedation were significantly associated with midazolam dosage (p less than 0.0001).