Mechanistic studies in man, laboratory animals and in vitro systems

Cytotoxicity of 28 MEIC Chemicals to Rat Hepatocytes using Two Viability Endpoints: Correlation with Acute Toxicity Data in Rat and Man

28 of the chemicals on the MEIC list were tested on rat hepatocytes in culture. Firstly, the metabolic capacities of the cell model were characterised, i.e. cytochrome P450 content and conjugation activities. Two independent endpoints, MTT (tetrazolium salt) reduction (for mitochondrial integrity) and neutral red uptake (NRU, for lysosomal integrity), were then used to measure the cytotoxicities of the test compounds after incubation with the cells for 24 hours. The relative toxicities of the test chemicals were measured by the determination of IC50 values for each parameter. Statistical analysis revealed a correlation between the results obtained in the two assays. The NRU assay, however, proved to be more sensitive than the MTT reduction assay. When the in vitro results were compared with those obtained from an in vivo data bank, good agreement was found with the acute toxicities of the test products in rats, with the exception of thioridazine, malathion, copper sulphate (all overestimated) and potassium cyanide (underestimated). In addition, a good correlation between basal cytotoxicity values for rat hepatocytes and LD50 for rats or lethal doses for humans was observed. These results suggest that the MTT reduction and/or NRU assays could be useful indicators of the cytotoxic potential of chemicals in rat hepatocyte cultures and thus provide information on the intrinsic lethal toxicity of compounds and their metabolites to rats and humans.

Unexpected tumour findings in lifetime rodent bioassay studies--what to do?

Currently, the majority of substances tested in lifetime bioassays in rodents are not mutagenic and, therefore, at the most weakly carcinogenic, generally by epigenetic mechanisms. It thus appears obvious that only marginal increases of tumour incidences can be expected in lifetime bioassays and that, therefore, every aspect of a potential carcinogenic effect must be thoroughly evaluated. This paper describes a series of key factors, which should be looked at in order to exclude that the lifetime bioassay in question is flawed for design, technical or qualification reasons. It also provides some hints whether there is indeed a real effect and not just a variation of the spontaneous tumour incidences. Tumour findings must be seen in the context of the animal model, the pharmcokinetics and pharmcodynamics of the test substance, as well as any other observation in the present or other studies with the test substance, including non-tumour findings and--in particular--potential precursor lesions and effects on feed intake and survival. The possibility that the observed carcinogenic effects may be species-specific and not relevant for man is discussed. It is also important to check what findings are reported with similar substances or substances with the same pharmacological effect. Data from additional investigations on material of the same study and/or mechanistic studies are often needed to support the final risk assessment.

Biological properties of peroxide-containing tooth whiteners

Peroxides have been used in tooth whitening for more than 100 years. Current peroxide-containing whiteners can be classified into three categories: (1) those containing high concentrations of peroxides for professional use only; (2) materials dispensed by dentists and used by patients at home; and (3) over-the-counter products available directly to consumers for home use. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and carbamide peroxide are the most commonly used active ingredients in these whiteners. Both peroxides have long been used safely in oral health products and are accepted by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, questions have been raised regarding the safety of at-home whiteners because the peroxides appear to constitute a new use. Substantial differences exist in the manner of application between at-home whiteners and oral health products. In addition, tooth whiteners are a mixture of various ingredients; possible interactions may occur because of the active nature of peroxides. Therefore, the safety evidence for peroxide-containing whiteners is considered inadequate. This paper will review the history of using peroxides for tooth whitening, the toxicology of H2O2 and carbamide peroxide, and available information on the safety of whiteners. The rationale and approaches for evaluating biological properties of peroxide containing whiteners are also discussed.

Comparative Cell Toxicology: The Basis for In Vitro Toxicity Testing

If “cell toxicology” is defined as the discipline aimed at studying the general principles of chemical interference with cellular structures and/or functions, then “comparative cell toxicology” may be defined as the study of the variety of responses to xenobiotics using: (a) different endpoints within one cell type; (b) cell types from different tissues from one species; and (c) homologous cell types from different species. If the full potential of in vitro models for toxicity testing is to be realised and the scientific basis for hazard assessment improved, then comparative cell toxicological approaches have to be developed further. In the present paper, an approach using different in vitro systems is described. The approach is aimed at the assessment of the basic toxicological characteristics of chemicals.