Failure of physostigmine in intoxications with tricyclic antidepressants in rats

Drugs and pharmaceuticals: management of intoxication and antidotes

The treatment of patients poisoned with drugs and pharmaceuticals can be quite challenging. Diverse exposure circumstances, varied clinical presentations, unique patient-specific factors, and inconsistent diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure support, coupled with relatively few definitive antidotes, may complicate evaluation and management. The historical approach to poisoned patients (patient arousal, toxin elimination, and toxin identification) has given way to rigorous attention to the fundamental aspects of basic life support--airway management, oxygenation and ventilation, circulatory competence, thermoregulation, and substrate availability. Selected patients may benefit from methods to alter toxin pharmacokinetics to minimize systemic, target organ, or tissue compartment exposure (either by decreasing absorption or increasing elimination). These may include syrup of ipecac, orogastric lavage, activated single- or multi-dose charcoal, whole bowel irrigation, endoscopy and surgery, urinary alkalinization, saline diuresis, or extracorporeal methods (hemodialysis, charcoal hemoperfusion, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, and exchange transfusion). Pharmaceutical adjuncts and antidotes may be useful in toxicant-induced hyperthermias. In the context of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anticholinergic, anticonvulsant, antihyperglycemic, antimicrobial, antineoplastic, cardiovascular, opioid, or sedative-hypnotic agents overdose, N-acetylcysteine, physostigmine, L-carnitine, dextrose, octreotide, pyridoxine, dexrazoxane, leucovorin, glucarpidase, atropine, calcium, digoxin-specific antibody fragments, glucagon, high-dose insulin euglycemia therapy, lipid emulsion, magnesium, sodium bicarbonate, naloxone, and flumazenil are specifically reviewed. In summary, patients generally benefit from aggressive support of vital functions, careful history and physical examination, specific laboratory analyses, a thoughtful consideration of the risks and benefits of decontamination and enhanced elimination, and the use of specific antidotes where warranted. Data supporting antidotes effectiveness vary considerably. Clinicians are encouraged to utilize consultation with regional poison centers or those with toxicology training to assist with diagnosis, management, and administration of antidotes, particularly in unfamiliar cases.

Assessing physostigmine's contraindication in cyclic antidepressant ingestions

Ingestion of cyclic antidepressant medications or prolongation of the electrocardiographic QRS interval are commonly considered as contraindications to the use of physostigmine as an antidote for antimuscarinic toxicity. This dictum seems to stem from a few well-publicized cases in which administration of physostigmine was temporally associated with the development of asystole. Before the report of these cases, physostigmine was more frequently used and had been considered a first-line antidote for both the neurologic and cardiac toxic effects of cyclic antidepressant overdose. This apparent inconsistency, and a resurgence of interest in physostigmine as an antidote, begs the question of the appropriateness of this drug's contraindication in all cyclic antidepressant ingestions. Review of the published clinical and experimental evidence provides little support for the clinical utility of using electrocardiographic criteria or the ingestion of cyclic antidepressants as contraindications to the use of physostigmine.