Resuscitation of battle casualties in South Vietnam: experiences at the First Australian Field Hospital

Penetrating injury to the buttock: an update

Clinical research on penetrating injury to the buttock is sparse and largely limited to case reports and clinical series. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed overview of literature of the topic and to propose a basic algorithm for management of penetrating gluteal injuries (PGI). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochran, and CINAHL databases were employed. Thirty-seven papers were selected and retrieved for overview from 1,021 records. PGI accounts for 2-3 % of all penetrating injuries, with a mortality rate up to 4 %. Most haemodynamically stable patients will benefit from traditional wound care and selective non-operative management. When gluteal fascia injury is confirmed or suspected, a contrast-enhanced CT-scan provides the most accurate injury diagnosis. CT-scan-based angiography and endovascular interventions radically supplement assessment and management of patients with penetrating injury to the major buttock and adjacent extra-buttock arteries. Immediate life-saving damage-control surgery is indicated for patients with hypovolemic shock and signs of internal bleeding. A universal basic management algorithm is proposed. This overview shows that penetrating injury to the buttock should be regarded as a potential life-threatening injury, and therefore, patients with such injuries should be managed in trauma centres equipped with hybrid operating theatres for emergency endovascular and open surgery for multidisciplinary teams operating 24/7.

Analytical review of 664 cases of penetrating buttock trauma

A comprehensive review of data has not yet been provided as penetrating injury to the buttock is not a common condition accounting for 2-3% of all penetrating injuries. The aim of the study is to provide the as yet lacking analytical review of the literature on penetrating trauma to the buttock, with appraisal of characteristics, features, outcomes, and patterns of major injuries. Based on these results we will provide an algorithm. Using a set of terms we searched the databases Pub Med, EMBASE, Cochran, and CINAHL for articles published in English between 1970 and 2010. We analysed cumulative data from prospective and retrospective studies, and case reports. The literature search revealed 36 relevant articles containing data on 664 patients. There was no grade A evidence found. The injury population mostly consists of young males (95.4%) with a high proportion missile injury (75.9%). Bleeding was found to be the key problem which mostly occurs from internal injury and results in shock in 10%. Overall mortality is 2.9% with significant adverse impact of visceral or vascular injury and shock (P < 0.001). The major injury pattern significantly varies between shot and stab injury with small bowel, colon, or rectum injuries leading in shot wounds, whilst vascular injury leads in stab wounds (P < 0.01). Laparotomy was required in 26.9% of patients. Wound infection, sepsis or multiorgan failure, small bowel fistula, ileus, rebleeding, focal neurologic deficit, and urinary tract infection were the most common complications. Sharp differences in injury pattern endorse an algorithm for differential therapy of penetrating buttock trauma. In conclusion, penetrating buttock trauma should be regarded as a life-threatening injury with impact beyond the pelvis until proven otherwise.

Fluid replacement for hypotensive injury victims: how, when and what risks?

Intravenous fluid administration is considered universally indicated for patients with post-traumatic hypotension of presumed hemorrhagic origin, regardless of the mechanism of injury, anatomic location, and whether hemostasis has been achieved. This premise is based primarily on animal studies in which blood loss results from a controlled catheter withdrawal. However, more recent hemorrhage models that incorporate a vascular injury, as well as recently completed clinical trials, have indicated that attempts to restore blood pressure before surgical hemostasis may have the undesirable effects of accentuating hemorrhage and mortality.