Combined acute respiratory and renal failure: management by continuous hemodiafiltration

The effect of acute kidney injury on long-term health-related quality of life: a prospective follow-up study

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication in critically ill patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We hypothesized that ICU survivors with AKI would have a worse health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcome than ICU survivors without AKI.

Methods

We performed a long-term prospective observational study. Patients admitted for > 48 hours in a medical-surgical ICU were included and divided in two groups: patients who fulfilled RIFLE criteria for AKI and patients without AKI. We used the Short-Form 36 to evaluate HRQOL before admission (by proxy within 48 hours after admission of the patient), at ICU discharge, hospital discharge, 3 and 6 months following ICU discharge (all by patients). Recovery in HRQOL from ICU-admission onwards was assessed using linear mixed modelling.

Results

Between September 2000 and January 2007 all admissions were screened for study participation. We included a total of 749 patients. At six months after ICU discharge 73 patients with AKI and 325 patients without AKI could be evaluated. In survivors with and without AKI, the pre-admission HRQOL (by proxy) and at six months after ICU discharge was significantly lower compared with an age matched general population. Most SF-36 dimensions changed significantly over time from ICU discharge. Change over time of HRQOL between the different AKI Rifle classes (Risk, Injury, Failure) showed no significant differences. At ICU discharge, scores were lowest in the group with AKI compared with the group without AKI for the physical functioning, role-physical and general health dimensions. However, there were almost no differences in HRQOL between both groups at six months.

Conclusions

The pre-admission HRQOL (by proxy) of AKI survivors was significantly lower in two dimensions compared with the age matched general population. Six months after ICU discharge survivors with and without AKI showed an almost similar HRQOL. However, compared with the general population with a similar age, HRQOL was poorer in both groups.

High-dose renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of renal replacement therapy dose on mortality and dialysis dependence in patients with acute kidney injury.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to October 2009; PubMed "Related Articles;" bibliographies of included trials; and additional information from trial authors.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized and quasi-randomized, controlled trials in adults with acute kidney injury prescribed highvs. standard-dose continuous renal replacement therapy (> or =30 mL/kg/hr vs. <30 mL/kg/hr), intermittent hemodialysis, or sustained low-efficiency dialysis (daily vs. alternate day, or by target biochemistry).

DATA EXTRACTION

Three authors independently selected studies and extracted data on outcomes and study quality. Meta-analyses used random-effects models.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 5416 citations, 12 trials (n = 3999) met inclusion criteria. Modalities included continuous renal replacement therapy (7 trials), intermittent hemodialysis (3 trials), sustained low-efficiency dialysis (1 trial), and all three (1 trial). Study quality was moderate-high. Meta-analyses found no effect of high-dose renal replacement therapy on mortality (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.03; 12 trials; n = 3954) or dialysis dependence among survivors (risk ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.44; 8 trials with events; n = 1743). The effect on mortality was similar (all interaction p values were nonsignificant) in patients with sepsis (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.23; 9 trials; n = 1786) vs. without sepsis (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.05; 8 trials; n = 1955), treated exclusively with continuous renal replacement therapy (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.06; 7 trials; n = 2462) vs. other modalities alone or in combination (risk ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 -1.21; 5 trials; n = 1492), and in trials with low (risk ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.09; 6 trials; n = 3475) vs. higher (risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.09; 6 trials; n = 479) risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury does not improve patient survival or recovery of renal function overall or in important patient subgroups, including those with sepsis.

Development of a continuous renal replacement program in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients encounter many obstacles, such as acute renal failure, that increases length of stay as well as hospital cost. Dialysis in these patients is often ineffective thereby prolonging the inevitable and significantly increasing the cost of care. A dialysis program that could improve patient care, potentially improve outcome and be "revenue neutral" would be ideal.

METHODS

A continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) program was developed to significantly impact the care of critically ill patients Using the latest CRRT equipment along with an innovative hands-on CRRT training program, a specialized CRRT team was created. Working in conjunction with the hospital business office, new revenue charge codes were created and existing codes were updated. Patients who underwent CRRT had their financial records reviewed for: hospital cost to perform CRRT, total hospital billing to the payer, CRRT revenue 881 (billing units) charged to the payer, total charges and reimbursement for the account, percentage of reimbursement, collected revenue, and payer.

RESULTS

From April 2000 to February 2002, 39 critically ill patients underwent CRRT. Initial set-up cost was US$79,622.80 and the cost of CRRT was US$222,323.98. The hospital billed for US$656,090.63 and assuming 100% reimbursement, the potential profit was US$427,678.50. However, loss of revenue, mainly from noncompliance with charge capture resulted in the hospital billing only US$386,794.32 with a total reimbursement of US$165,779.86. The 21 burn patients who underwent CRRT yielded a net profit of US$10,294.12, with the highest reimbursement from workman's compensation and private payers. The overall mortality rate was 59% and 65% for the burn patients; significantly lower than published national averages.

CONCLUSIONS

An in-house CRRT program improved patient care by providing dialysis in patients who normally would not tolerate the procedure. Although there was a loss of revenue, CRRT in the burn patients appeared "revenue neutral." Although not specifically studied in this review, based on published data, mortality rates in this population were lower than expected especially in critically ill burn patients.

Effects of early high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: a prospective, randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of the initiation time of continuous venovenous hemofiltration and of the ultrafiltrate rate in patients with circulatory and respiratory insufficiency developing early oliguric acute renal failure. The primary end points were mortality at 28 days and recovery of renal function.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled, two-center study.

SETTING

The closed-format multidisciplinary intensive care units of a university hospital (30 beds) and a teaching hospital (18 beds).

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

A total of 106 ventilated severely ill patients who were oliguric despite massive fluid resuscitation, inotropic support, and high-dose intravenous diuretics were randomized into three groups. Thirty-five patients were treated with early high-volume hemofiltration (72-96 L per 24 hrs), 35 patients with early low-volume hemofiltration (24-36 L per 24 hrs), and 36 patients with late low-volume hemofiltration (24-36 L per 24 hrs).

RESULTS

Median ultrafiltrate rate was 48.2 (42.3-58.7) mL.kg(-1).hr(-1) in early high-volume hemofiltration, 20.1 (17.5-22.0) mL.kg(-1).hr(-1) in early low-volume hemofiltration, and 19.0 (16.6-21.1) mL.kg(-1).hr(-1) in late low-volume hemofiltration. Survival at day 28 was 74.3% in early high-volume hemofiltration, 68.8% in early low-volume hemofiltration, and 75.0% in late low-volume hemofiltration (p =.80). On average, hemofiltration started 7 hrs after inclusion in the early groups and 42 hrs after inclusion in the late group. All hospital survivors had recovery of renal function at hospital discharge, except for one patient in the early low-volume hemofiltration group. Median duration of renal failure in hospital survivors was 4.3 (1.4-7.8) days in early high-volume hemofiltration, 3.2 (2.4-5.4) days in early low-volume hemofiltration, and 5.6 (3.1-8.5) days in late low-volume hemofiltration (p =.25).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study of critically ill patients with oliguric acute renal failure, survival at 28 days and recovery of renal function were not improved using high ultrafiltrate volumes or early initiation of hemofiltration.

The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative--part VII: fluid composition and management in CRRT

Fluid composition and management are important parts of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Most commercially available CRRT solutions are able to reestablish electrolyte homeostasis provided some phosphate supplementation is given. Supraphysiologic glucose concentrations should be avoided. Predilution fluid replacement allows higher ultrafiltration rates and can be considered as an adjunct to the anticoagulation regimen. Lactate is an effective buffer in most CRRT patients. Bicarbonate is preferred in patients with lactic acidosis and/or liver failure. When citrate is used as anticoagulant, frequent monitoring of pH is required. The clinical consequences of CRRT-induced decreases of body temperature are not clear. Substitution fluid should be sterile, but the bacteriologic requirements for CRRT dialysate are less clear. There is no consensus on the optimal parameters to monitor fluid management. Integrated balancing systems have theoretical advantages over adaptive use of intravenous fluid pumps. Although there is evidence that volume overload is associated with adverse outcome, there is no evidence that fluid removal per se improves outcome in critically ill patients with or without acute renal failure.

Neurologic complications in the intensive care unit

Neurologic complications resulting from critical illness and intensive care unit therapies are common, but frequently unrecognized because these patients are often intubated, sedated, and, occasionally, receiving neuromuscular blocking agents. Neurologic complications are associated with an increased intensive care unit mortality. This article discusses central nervous system complications that are secondary to critical illness or to therapeutic interventions in the critically ill patient.

Hemodynamics and survival of patients with acute renal failure treated by continuous dialysis with two synthetic membranes

Synthetic membranes are not identical and have specific interactions that may be harmful or beneficial. We have investigated the incidence of hypotension and the outcome of acute renal failure (ARF) in ventilated patients treated by continuous venovenous dialysis with 2 different synthetic membranes. In Study 1, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were monitored during the first 12 min of dialysis with polyacrylonitrile (PAN). In Study 2, the MAP and survival rates were compared in patients randomly assigned to either PAN or polysulfone. No subjects were receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. In Study 1, the MAP decreased due to a reduction in the SVR during the first 6 min of dialysis but returned to the baseline value by 12 min in 22 patients during 27 dialysis treatments. In Study 2, the MAP was lower than the baseline value at 6 min during 233 dialysis treatments in 133 patients randomly assigned to PAN or polysulfone membranes (PAN group, 81.5 +/- 15 to 78.7 +/- 15.6 mm Hg, p = 0.001; and polysulfone group, 81.3 +/- 15.4 to 80.0 +/- 15.7 mm Hg, p = 0.06). Severe reductions in the MAP were seen during 13.2% of the PAN and 7.2% of the polysulfone treatments (chi 2, p = NS). The age, APACHE II score, MAP, inotrope requirement, and primary diagnosis did not differ according to membrane material in a total of 197 consecutive patients (PAN, n = 97; polysulfone, n = 100). Patients survival was 29% (PAN) and 27% (polysulfone). In multivariate analysis, APACHE II score, inotrope requirement, and liver failure were significant determinants of survival. In conclusion, PAN and polysulfone membranes were not different with respect to hypotensive reactions or survival in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodialysis.