Calibration of the carotenoid band shift and the response of the external membrane potential probe oxonol VI with diffusion potentials in (proteo)liposomes and chloroplasts

A protet-based, protonic charge transfer model of energy coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation

Textbooks of biochemistry will explain that the otherwise endergonic reactions of ATP synthesis can be driven by the exergonic reactions of respiratory electron transport, and that these two half-reactions are catalyzed by protein complexes embedded in the same, closed membrane. These views are correct. The textbooks also state that, according to the chemiosmotic coupling hypothesis, a (or the) kinetically and thermodynamically competent intermediate linking the two half-reactions is the electrochemical difference of protons that is in equilibrium with that between the two bulk phases that the coupling membrane serves to separate. This gradient consists of a membrane potential term Δψ and a pH gradient term ΔpH, and is known colloquially as the protonmotive force or pmf. Artificial imposition of a pmf can drive phosphorylation, but only if the pmf exceeds some 150-170mV; to achieve in vivo rates the imposed pmf must reach 200mV. The key question then is 'does the pmf generated by electron transport exceed 200mV, or even 170mV?' The possibly surprising answer, from a great many kinds of experiment and sources of evidence, including direct measurements with microelectrodes, indicates it that it does not. Observable pH changes driven by electron transport are real, and they control various processes; however, compensating ion movements restrict the Δψ component to low values. A protet-based model, that I outline here, can account for all the necessary observations, including all of those inconsistent with chemiosmotic coupling, and provides for a variety of testable hypotheses by which it might be refined.

Fluorescent probes for non-invasive bioenergetic studies of whole cyanobacterial cells

Fluorescent DeltapH and DeltaPsi indicators have been screened for the non-invasive monitoring of bioenergetic processes in whole cells of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Acridine yellow and Acridine orange proved to be the best DeltapH indicators for the investigation of thylakoid and cytoplasmic membrane energization: While Acridine yellow indicated only cytosolic energization, Acridine orange showed signals from both the thylakoid lumen and the cytosol that could be separated kinetically. Both indicators were applied successfully to monitor cellular energetics, such as the interplay of linear and cyclic photosynthetic electron transport, osmotic adaptation and solute transport across the cytoplasmic membrane. In contrast, useful membrane potential indicators were more difficult to find, with Di-4-ANEPPS and Brilliant cresyl blue being the only promising candidates for further studies. Finally, Acridine yellow and Acridine orange could also be applied successfully for the thermophilic cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus. Different from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, where both respiration and ATP hydrolysis could be utilized for cytoplasmic membrane energization, proton extrusion at the cytoplasmic membrane in Synechococcus elongatus was preferentially driven by ATP hydrolysis.

Membrane electrostatics

In conclusion, charged membrane together with their adjacent electrolyte solution form a thermodynamic and physico-chemical entity. Their surfaces represent an exceptionally complicated interfacial system owing to intrinsic membrane complexity, as well as to the polarity and often large thickness of the interfacial region. Despite this, charged membranes can be described reasonably accurately within the framework of available theoretical models, provided that the latter are chosen on the basis of suitable criteria, which are briefly discussed in Section A. Interion correlations are likely to be important for the regular and/or rigid, thin membrane-solution interfaces. Lateral distribution of the structural membrane charge is seldom and charge distribution perpendicular to the membranes is nearly always electrostatically important. So is the interfacial hydration, which to a large extent determines the properties of the innermost part of the interfacial region, with a thickness of 2-3 nm. Fine structure of the ion double-layer and the interfacial smearing of the structural membrane charge decrease whilst the surface hydration increases the calculated value of the electrostatic membrane potential relative to the result of common Gouy-Chapman approximation. In some cases these effects partly cancel-out; simple electrostatic models are then fairly accurate. Notwithstanding this, it is at present difficult to draw detailed molecular conclusions from a large part of the published data, mainly owing to the lack of really stringent controls or calibrations. Ion binding to the membrane surface is a complicated process which involves charge-charge as well as charge-solvent interactions. Its efficiency normally increases with the ion valency and with the membrane charge density, but it is also strongly dependent on the physico-chemical and thermodynamic state of the membrane. Except in the case of the stereospecific ion binding to a membrane, the relatively easily accessible phosphate and carboxylic groups on lipids and integral membrane proteins are the main cation binding sites. Anions bind preferentially to the amine groups, even on zwitterionic molecules. Membrane structure is apt to change upon ion binding but not always in the same direction: membranes with bound ions can either expand or become more condensed, depending on the final hydrophilicity (polarity) of the membrane surface. The more polar membranes, as a rule, are less tightly packed and more fluid. Diffusive ion flow across a membrane depends on the transmembrane potential and concentration gradients, but also on the coulombic and hydration potentials at the membrane surface.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)