Intradural tumors of the cauda equina: a single institution review of clinical characteristics

Lumbar Schwannoma as a Rare Cause of Radiculopathy in the Chiropractic Office: A Case Report

Cauda equina tumors are rare, slow-growing, and typically benign. These tumors present with low back pain resembling disc displacement with radiculopathy and thus may go undiagnosed for months. A 52-year-old, otherwise healthy man presented to a chiropractor with a one-year history of worsening low back pain radiating to the right lower extremity, rated an 8/10 in severity and aggravated by recumbency. Previously, his primary care physician had ordered radiographs revealing mild lumbar degenerative changes, prescribed a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and referred him to an orthopedist and physical therapist. There had been no change in symptoms. Upon examination by the chiropractor, the patient had neurologic deficits, and due to progressive worsening, the chiropractor recommended magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which the patient deferred due to cost. The chiropractor initiated a trial of care, with initial success; however, the patient's symptoms recurred, and he consented to an MRI. MRI revealed an intradural extramedullary lumbar tumor, and the chiropractor referred the patient to an oncologist, who referred the patient to a neurosurgeon. The neurosurgeon surgically removed the mass, with a biopsy confirming a schwannoma. The patient had significantly improved six weeks after surgery. This case highlights a patient with chronic low back pain for whom a chiropractor identified a cauda equina tumor and referred him for further evaluation and surgery. Clinicians should consider night pain and persistent symptoms, despite conservative care, as red flags warranting further investigation in those with low back pain. Providers should refer for neurosurgical evaluation when clinical and radiological findings suggest a cauda equina tumor.

Cauda equina ependymomas: surgical treatment and long-term outcomes in a series of 125 patients

OBJECTIVE

Cauda equina ependymoma (CEE) is a rare tumor for which little information is available on the oncological and clinical outcomes of patients. In this study the authors aimed to address functional, oncological, and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in a large series of consecutive patients operated on at their institution during the past 20 years.

METHODS

The records of 125 patients who underwent surgery between January 1998 and September 2018 were reviewed. Analyzed variables included demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical, and histopathological features. Neurological outcomes were graded according to the McCormick and Kesselring scales. The QOL at follow-up was evaluated by administering the EQ-5DL questionnaire.

RESULTS

On admission, 84% of patients had a McCormick grade of I and 76.8% had a Kesselring score of 0. At follow-up (clinical 8.13 years; radiological 5.87 years) most scores were unchanged. Sacral level involvement (p = 0.029) and tumor size (p = 0.002) were predictors of poor functional outcome at discharge. Tumor size (p = 0.019) and repeated surgery (p < 0.001) were predictors of poor outcome. A preoperative McCormick grade ≥ III and Kesselring grade ≥ 2 were associated with worse outcomes (p = 0.035 and p = 0.002, respectively). Myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) was more frequent than grade II ependymoma (EII). The overall rate of gross-total resection (GTR) was 91.2% and rates were significantly higher for patients with EII (98%) than for those with MPE (84%) (p = 0.0074). On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with GTR was the presence of a capsule (p = 0.011). Seventeen patients (13.7%) had recurrences (13 MPE, 4 EII; 76.4% vs 23.6%; p = 0.032). The extent of resection was the only factor associated with recurrence (p = 0.0023) and number of surgeries (p = 0.006). Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) were seen depending on the extent of resection at first operation (p < 0.001), subarachnoid seeding (p = 0.041), piecemeal resection (p = 0.004), and number of spine levels involved (3 [p = 0.016], 4 [p = 0.011], or ≥ 5 [p = 0.013]). At follow-up a higher proportion of EII than MPE patients were disease free (94.7% vs 77.7%; p = 0.007). The QOL results were inferior in almost all areas compared to a control group of subjects from the Italian general population. A McCormick grade ≥ 3 and repeated surgeries were associated with a worse QOL (p = 0.006 and p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

An early diagnosis of CEE is important because larger tumors are associated with recurrences and worse functional neurological outcomes. Surgery should be performed with the aim of achieving an en bloc GTR. The histological subtype was not directly associated with recurrences, but some of the features more commonly encountered in MPEs were. The outcomes are in most cases favorable, but the mean QOL perception is inferior to that of the general population.

Conus medullaris and cauda equina tumors: clinical presentation, prognosis, and outcome after surgical treatment: clinical article

OBJECT

Intradural cauda equina and conus medullaris tumors (CECMTs) are rare. Only a few large clinical series exist to date. Therefore, clinical symptoms, surgical complications, and outcomes are poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcome after surgery of CECMTs and to identify the factors associated with a worse clinical prognosis based on the results of a series with sufficiently high number of cases.

METHODS

All cases of intradural CECMTs treated surgically at the authors' department between March 2006 and May 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Arachnoid cysts and multifocal tumors were excluded. Sixty-eight adult patients met the inclusion criteria (35 female and 33 male patients; median age 56 years). Follow-up data were available for 72% (n = 49) in a median period of 9 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 tumors were located intramedullary and 50 extramedullary. The majority were nerve sheath tumors (n = 27), ependymomas (n = 17), and meningiomas (n = 9). The most common preoperative symptom was pain. The rate of new transient postoperative impairment was 18% (n = 12), and new permanent deficits were observed in only 6% (n = 4). Overall neurological improvement was achieved in 62%. The reversibility of preoperative symptoms was related to the interval between the time of symptom onset and the time of surgery and to the presence of preoperative neurological deficits. Surgery of ependymoma and carcinoma metastases was associated with a higher rate of morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradural CECMTs present as a group of tumors with varying histological features and clinical symptoms. Symptomatic manifestation is usually unspecific, mimicking degenerative lumbar spine syndromes. Despite a significant risk of transient deterioration, early surgery is advisable because more than 94% of patients maintain at least their preoperative status and more than 60% improve during follow-up. The reversibility of preoperative symptoms is related to the duration between symptom onset and surgery and to the presence of preoperative neurological deficits. The prognosis for recovery from cauda equina or conus medullaris syndrome is less favorable than for other deficits. Surgery of ependymoma is associated with a higher morbidity rate than other benign entities.

Removal of intradural-extramedullary spinal cord tumors with unilateral limited laminectomy

Total laminectomy for the removal of intradural-extramedullary spinal cord tumors has been used widely, but postoperative complications often develop, such as kyphosis, spinal instability, and persistent back pain. In this study, we evaluated seven patients with intradural-extramedullary spinal cord tumors with respect to the value of unilateral limited laminectomy. Our cases included six schwannomas, and one meningioma. The cervical region was involved in four cases, the thoracolumbar region in two cases, and the lumbar region in one case. The rationale for choosing a unilateral approach is to preserve musculoligamentous attachments and posterior bony elements as much as possible. The patients were mobilized on the third postoperative day and preoperative neurological symptoms were recovered within a few weeks. We did not observe any complication relating to unilateral limited laminectomy and at follow-up evaluation (at 3 and 12 months postoperatively), none of the patients showed spinal deformity or spinal instability. We think that the unilateral limited laminectomy is a safe and efficient technique for the treatment of intradural-extramedullary spinal cord tumors. We suggest that this technique is one of the best treatments for these tumors.

Clinical Features of Cauda Equina Tumors Requiring Surgical Treatment

In this study, we evaluated the clinical features of cauda equina tumors requiring surgical treatment. Medical records of 28 patients with cauda equina tumors (13 men and 15 women) undergoing surgical treatment were retrospectively reviewed. The majority of histological diagnoses indicated schwannoma (23 cases, 82%), and the remaining 5 indicated ependymoma, neurofibroma, meningioma, and ganglioneuroblastoma. In 86% of the cases, the initial symptom was pain in the lower back and/or lower extremities. Preoperatively, half of the patients had symmetrical pain in the lower back or lower extremities, severe pain in the supine position, or pain that was increased by coughing. One third of the patients needed morphine to control nocturnal pain. Tumor size, as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), correlated with preoperative symptom duration (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that symmetrical lower back pain and/or pain that radiates to both lower extremities and increases in the supine position are characteristic of cauda equina tumors. The correlation between symptom duration and tumor size indicates that earlier diagnosis of this tumor is necessary. Earlier diagnosis based on these characteristic symptoms should make use of further examinations such as MRI.

Unilateral limited laminectomy as the approach of choice for the removal of thoracolumbar neurofibromas

STUDY DESIGN

The paper reports a minimally invasive approach to the dorsolumbar spine for the removal of neurofibromas.

OBJECTIVES

Demonstrating that a limited unilateral approach is the one of choice for this kind of tumors.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors are generally removed by single-level or multilevel laminectomy with midline dural incision. Cases of delayed postoperative kyphosis and spinal instability (6%) may be reduced by unilateral microsurgery, causing minimum damage to ligaments and joints.

METHODS

Ten patients with dorsolumbar neurofibroma were operated on between June 2000 and June 2002. There were 5 males (all with lumbar) and 5 females (2 with lumbar and 3 with inferior dorsal neurofibromas). One female had 3 lumbar tumors and required two operations. Surgery was performed in the prone position with a unilateral approach, sparing the joint and the ligamentum interspinosum. The dura was opened paramedially and the tumor dissected from the root and removed in one piece when possible. Water-tight dural closure was done with 5-0 or 6-0 stitches.

RESULTS

All the patients were mobilized on day 2 and discharged on day 4 or day 5. No complications resulting from the technique were observed. Static and dynamic plain radiograph films showed that none of them had kyphosis and/or instability 6 months postoperatively. Neurologic results were good.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital stay may be reduced and stability may be preserved with an appropriate microsurgical technique. The technique reported in the paper should thus become the one of choice and extended to other spinal intradural extramedullary tumors.