Analgesic dilemma in chronic hemodialysis patients

Drug abuse and headache

Substance abuse has been reported frequently in chronic headache patients. The problem exists in most Western countries. Abuse of various compounds frequently leads to a state of dependency. Prescription as well as over-the-counter agents are often abused. Aspirin, acetaminophen, and caffeine are the most frequently abused compounds. Butalbital, ergot alkaloids, NSAIDS, and narcotic and oral or intranasal sympathomimetics are often abused. Patients with chronic daily headache complain of symptoms that may suggest a mixed-type headache. Features of migraine and muscle contraction headache often coexist in these individuals. It has been suggested that the most frequent cause for the transformation of a periodic headache into a daily headache is substance abuse. Substance abuse and drug dependency have multiple causes, and the etiology will reside with the compounds that are used to excess. The problem may arise as a result of poor instructions from the physician, improper diagnosis with gradual escalation in amounts of drug consumed, or a reinforcement mechanism and a brain stimulation-reward effect. The brain reward system has been studied with narcotics and psychomotor stimulants. It may be activated to a lesser degree with ergotamine, barbiturates, and other abused substances. The long-term effects of substance abuse are contingent on the compounds that are used. They may result in organ damage, medical complications, vascular injury, and a refractory state with chronic headache that eludes successful management of the headache disorder. Patients exhibit a less-than-satisfactory quality of life and are often depressed. Treatment includes outpatient care in cooperative, less dependent patients. Often patients will require inpatient management in order to discontinue use of the abused agents. Pharmacologic agents, behavior modification, psychotherapy, dietary intervention, and acupuncture may be necessary to treat the patient. Each patient must be treated by an interested physician, and the patient will require one or more of the preceding measures for a successful outcome. Often abused compounds must be discontinued in order to obtain a satisfactory response in an individual with chronic headache.

Analgesic-associated nephropathy

Although the question of whether or not analgesic abuse leads to a certain type of nephropathy has been investigated since 1953, no conclusive answer has been forthcoming. Epidemiologic investigations on the correlation between analgesic abuse and renal function as well as experimental animal studies have given contradictory results concerning the possibility of analgesic-associated kidney damage. However, studies on the correlation between analgesic abuse and papillary necrosis have demonstrated that this lesion coincides in 69% of the cases with an analgesic history. Follow-up studies of patients with analgesic nephropathy have shown that renal function deteriorates in 60% of the patients with continued abuse and that it stabilizes in 80% of the patients after cessation of abuse. Studies on the legislative restriction of phenacetin/acetaminophen, carried out mostly in Scandinavian countries since 1965, show a 50%-90% decline in signs of analgesic nephropathy (papillary necrosis) following a reduction in the sale of these drugs. The prevalence of analgesic abuse may be underestimated, since up to 80% of the abusers tend to deny their analgesic intake. Obviously, only a small percentage of analgesic abusers (approximately 1%) finally develop nephropathy. Even though the results of epidemiologic and experimental studies are contradictory, the results of investigations on papillary necrosis and on legislative prevention as well as of patient follow-ups tend to indicate a correlation between analgesic abuse and a well-defined type of nephropathy.