Systemic injections of alpha-1 adrenergic agonists produce antinociception in the formalin test

Suppressive Effects of Bee Venom-Derived Phospholipase A2 on Mechanical Allodynia in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain

Bee venom (BV) has a long history of being used in traditional Korean medicine to relieve pain. Here, we investigated the effect of BV-derived phospholipase A2 (bvPLA2), a major component of BV, on peripheral nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain in rats. Spinal nerve ligation (SNL) was performed in Sprague Dawley rats to induce neuropathic pain, and paw withdrawal thresholds were measured using von Frey test. Mechanical allodynia, the representative symptom of neuropathic pain, was manifested following SNL and persisted for several weeks. The repetitive bvPLA2 treatment (0.2 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for two days significantly relieved the SNL-induced mechanical allodynia. The antiallodynic effect of bvPLA2 was blocked by spinal pretreatment with α1-adrenergic antagonist prazosin (30 μg, i.t.) but not with α2-adrenergic antagonist idazoxan (50 μg, i.t.). Also, the spinal application of α1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (50 μg, i.t.) reduced mechanical allodynia. These results indicate that bvPLA2 could relieve nerve injury-induced neuropathic mechanical allodynia through the activation of spinal α1-adrenergic receptors.

Mechanisms of imidazoline I2 receptor agonist-induced antinociception in rats: involvement of monoaminergic neurotransmission

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although the antinociceptive efficacies of imidazoline I₂ receptor agonists have been established, the exact post-receptor mechanisms remain unknown. This study tested the hypothesis that monoaminergic transmission is critical for I₂ receptor agonist-induced antinociception.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

von Frey filaments were used to assess antinociceptive effects of two I₂ receptor agonists, 2-BFI and CR4056 on chronic constriction injury (CCI)-induced neuropathic pain or complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced inflammatory pain in rats. Rectal temperature was measured to assess hypothermic effects of 2-BFI. A two-lever drug discrimination paradigm in which rats were trained to discriminate 5.6 mg·kg^-1 2-BFI (i.p.) from its vehicle was used to examine the discriminative stimulus effects of 2-BFI. In each experiment, pharmacological mechanisms were investigated by combining 2-BFI or CR4056 with various pharmacological manipulations of the monoaminergic system including selective reuptake inhibition, monoamine depletion and monoamine receptor antagonism.

KEY RESULTS

In the CCI model, selective reuptake inhibitors of 5-HT (fluoxetine) or noradrenaline (desipramine), but not dopamine (GBR12909), enhanced 2-BFI-induced antinociception. Selective depletion of 5-HT or noradrenaline almost abolished 2-BFI-induced antinociception. 5-HT_1A , 5-HT_2A and α₁ -adrenoceptor antagonists, but not other monoaminergic antagonists, attenuated 2-BFI and CR4056-induced antinociception in CCI and/or CFA models. However, none of these monoamine receptor antagonists significantly altered 2-BFI-induced hypothermia or discriminative stimulus effects.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Antinociception induced by I₂ receptor agonists was mediated by serotonergic and noradrenergic mechanisms with 5-HT_1A , 5-HT_2A and α₁ -adrenoceptor being particularly important. In contrast, the hypothermic and discriminative stimulus effects of I₂ receptor agonists were mediated by distinct, independent mechanisms.

Rubus occidentalis alleviates hyperalgesia induced by repeated intramuscular injection of acidic saline in rats

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antinociceptive effect of black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis) fruit extract (ROE) in a rat model of chronic muscle pain and examine the mechanisms involved.

Methods

Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were used, and chronic muscle pain was induced by two injections of acidic saline into one gastrocnemius muscle. For the first experiment, 50 rats were randomly assigned to five groups. After the development of hyperalgesia, rats were injected intraperitoneally with 0.9 % saline or ROE (10, 30, 100, or 300 mg/kg). For the second experiment, 70 rats were randomly assigned to seven groups. Rats were injected intraperitoneally with saline, yohimbine, dexmedetomidine, prazosin, atropine, mecamylamine, or naloxone after the development of hyperalgesia. Ten minutes later, ROE (300 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally. For both experiments, the mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) was evaluated with von Frey filaments before the first acidic saline injection, 24 h after the second injection, and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 80, 100, and 120 min, 24 and 48 h after the drug administration.

Results

Compared with the control group, the MWT significantly increased up to 45 min after injection of ROE 100 mg/kg and up to 60 min after injection of ROE 300 mg/kg, respectively. Injection of ROE together with yohimbine or mecamylamine significantly decreased the MWT compared with the effect of ROE alone, while ROE together with dexmedetomidine significantly increased the MWT.

Conclusions

ROE showed antinociceptive activity against induced chronic muscle pain, which may be mediated by α2-adrenergic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1192-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Changes induced by formalin pain in central alpha1-adrenoceptor density are modulated by adenosine receptor agonists

We aimed to elucidate the role of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in adenosine analgesia in the formalin test. Formalin was injected into the hind paw of male CD-1 mice after injection of adenosine A(1) or A(2a) receptor agonists, CPA, [N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine], and CGS21680 [2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenylethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride]. In the behavioral experiment, alpha(1)-adrenoceptors were blocked by an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin, 0.01 mg/kg i.p., and the time mice spent paw licking was recorded for the early (0-15 min) and late (15-60 min) phase of formalin pain. In the neurochemical experiments, mice were killed 15 or 45 min after formalin injection. The density of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors was assessed in various brain areas and in the lumbar spinal cord by [(3)H]prazosin autoradiography. Adenosine agonists produced analgesia in both phases of formalin pain, while prazosin showed a tendency to pronociceptive action in the late phase, and antagonized the effect of CGS21680. After formalin injection, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor density was elevated in some brain areas, mainly in the late phase (some contralateral amygdaloid and ipsilateral thalamic nuclei) and depressed in others (early phase in the ipsilateral spinal cord and late phase in both ipsi- and contralateral sensorimotor cortex). Elevation of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor density, which may be interpreted as a defensive response, did not develop in several cases of CPA-pretreated mice. This suggests that the analgesic effect of adenosine A(1) receptor activation renders the defensive response unnecessary. The depression of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors may suggest development of hypersensitivity in a given structure, and this was antagonized by CGS21680, suggesting the role of A(2a) receptors in control of inflammatory formalin pain.

Formalin hindpaw injection induces changes in the [3H]prazosin binding to alpha1-adrenoceptors in specific regions of the mouse brain and spinal cord

Involvement of the alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes in early and late phases of formalin pain was investigated by quantitative in vitro autoradiography in the spinal cord and brain structures of CD-1 mice. Total alpha1-adrenoceptors binding (including all alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes) was assessed with [3H]prazosin; alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor was assessed with [3H]prazosin in the presence of 10 nM WB4101 to mask remaining alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes. Early after formalin injection the alpha1-adrenoceptors (mainly alpha1B receptor) binding was reduced in the contralateral hind limb area of the somatosensory cortex and in the secondary motor cortex. A reduction occurred also in the ipsilateral laminae I-III of the spinal cord (both alpha1B- and non-alpha1B-adrenoceptors). Lately an increase of alpha1-adrenoceptors binding (mostly subtypes other than alpha1B) appeared in discrete amygdaloid and thalamic nuclei. These results provide the first description of changes at the level of central alpha1-adrenoceptors' binding during the formalin-induced pain in mice. Their distribution suggests that they may have a functional meaning.

On the mechanisms involved in antinociception induced by diphenyl diselenide

In this study, we described the local peripheral antinociceptive activity produced by diphenyl diselenide in the formalin test as compared to ebselen, an amply studied organoselenium compound. A second objective was to evaluate, the possible mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive effect caused by diphenyl diselenide. Administration of diphenyl diselenide or ebselen produced a significant antinociceptive local effect on the late phase (15-30min) of the formalin test. As well, diphenyl diselenide and ebselen injected in the contra lateral paw produced a significant decrease in licking time on the late phase (15-30min). The mechanisms underlying the analgesic action of diphenyl diselenide seem to be unlike the activation of opioid, dopaminergic D2, muscarinic cholinergic receptors or the interaction with α(1) and α(2) adrenoceptors. Furthermore, the effect of a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist in abolishing the antinociception induced by diphenyl diselenide suggests the involvement of serotonergic pathways.

Effect of alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on imipramine-induced antinociception in the rat formalin test

In this study, the effect of central administration of the alpha-adrenoceptor agents on the antinociception induced by imipramine in the formalin test has been investigated. Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of different doses of imipramine (10-80 mg/kg) and intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine (0.05-0.8 microg/rat) elicited a dose-dependent antinociception in the both phases of the test. Furthermore, different doses of clonidine (0.05-0.2 microg/rat) increased the antinociception induced by imipramine (10 and 20 mg/kg). The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (2 microg/rat, ICV) reduced the response of a low dose imipramine (10 mg/kg, IP) plus different doses of clonidine (0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 microg/rat, ICV), but did not alter the response induced by higher doses of imipramine (20 and 40 mg/kg) alone or in combination with clonidine. Yohimbine by itself elicited no effect. The alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (0.07-1.5 microg/rat) induced antinociception in both phases of the formalin test, but did not alter the imipramine-induced antinociception. The alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin neither elicited antinociception nor altered the imipramine response. Yohimbine (2 microg/ rat, ICV) in combination with prazosin (0.5 microg/rat, ICV) caused more inhibition of the response of imipramine or imipramine plus clonidine. Therefore, it is concluded that alpha(2)-adrenoceptor mechanism may be involved in the imipramine-induced antinociception.

An isobolographic analysis of the adrenergic modulation of diclofenac antinociception

We evaluated the noradrenergic modulation of the antinociceptive activity of diclofenac in mice using the acetic acid writhing test. Dose-response curves were obtained for the antinociceptive effect of diclofenac, phenylephrine, clonidine, desipramine, prazosin, and yohimbine administered both systemically and intrathecally, and ED(50)s were calculated. Noradrenergic modulation was evaluated by performing an isobolographic analysis of the systemic or intrathecal coadministration of fixed-ratio combinations of diclofenac with each adrenergic drug. The systemic, but not the intrathecal, combinations of diclofenac with phenylephrine or clonidine showed supraadditivity, suggesting that the activation of alpha(1) and alpha(2) adrenoceptors interfered with the nociceptive transmission at spinal and supraspinal levels. Supraadditive effects were not demonstrated for the intrathecal injection of diclofenac combined with phenylephrine, clonidine and a selective norepinephrine uptake inhibitor (desipramine) or adrenergic antagonists. We conclude that interaction between adrenoceptors and diclofenac can modulate antinociception by activating common or different mechanisms. Diclofenac has an antinociceptive activity that, in addition to cyclooxygenase inhibition, can be modulated by additive and supraadditive interactions with adrenergic drugs.

IMPLICATIONS

Diclofenac analgesia in mice can be modulated by interaction with adrenergic drugs. The systemic but not the intrathecal administration of phenylephrine and clonidine produced supraadditive interactions. For desipramine, prazosin, and yohimbine, supraadditive interactions were not statistically demonstrated. The coadministration of drugs inducing supraadditive effects could be clinically relevant for the treatment of chronic pain because of reduction of doses and side effects.

Interaction between the antinociceptive effect of ketoprofen and adrenergic modulatory systems

The interaction between the antinociceptive activity of ketoprofen and adrenergic agents was evaluated in the writhing test of mice. Dose-response curves were obtained for systemic and intrathecal antinociceptive effects of ketoprofen, phenylephrine, clonidine, desipramine, and prazosin; and ED50 were calculated. The interactions were evaluated by isobolographic analysis of the systemic or intrathecal co-administration of fixed-ratio combinations of ketoprofen with each adrenergic agent. The intraperitoneal combinations of ketoprofen with phenylephrine, clonidine, and prazosin showed supra-additivity, indicating that activation of alpha1 and alpha2 adrenoceptors play a role in nociceptive transmission at supraspinal levels. The same combinations given intrathecal were only additive. Desipramine intraperitoneal was also supra-additive: however, when ketoprofen was administered intrathecally with desipramine, only an additive interaction was obtained. The supra-additive interactions suggest that complementary mechanisms of antinociception have been activated, related with interference with the multiplicity of receptors and systems involved in the transmission of the nociceptive information. Racemic ketoprofen has an antinociceptive activity which is probably not only due to COX inhibition but also involves noradrenergic systems at spinal and supraspinal levels.

Effect of alpha-adrenoceptor agents on imipramine-induced antinociception in nerve-ligated mice

In this study, the effects of adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on antinociception induced by imipramine in sciatic-nerve-ligated mice were investigated. The response of different doses of morphine, imipramine and adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists was examined 14 days after unilateral nerve-ligation in the hot-plate test. Intraperitoneal injection of different doses of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg), imipramine (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg), the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine (0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) or the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist, phenylephrine (2, 4 and 8 mg/kg) induced dose-related antinociception in both intact and nerve-ligated mice. The antinociception induced by morphine but not that of imipramine, clonidine or phenylephrine, in nerve-ligated mice was significantly less than that induced in intact animals. Imipramine in combination with clonidine tends to induce a higher response, but the combination of imipramine with phenylephrine did not lead to significant potentiation. The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, reduced the response induced by imipramine or imipramine plus clonidine in intact and nerve-ligated animals. However, the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin, did not alter imipramine response. It may be concluded that imipramine induced antinociception in both intact and nerve-ligated mice through an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor mechanism(s).

Opioidergic and adrenergic modulation of formalin-evoked spinal c-fos mRNA expression and nocifensive behavior in the rat

Fos protein expression has been used to reflect neuronal activation in pain processing pathways although analgesics may uncouple behavioral and Fos responses. We determine whether formalin-induced spinal c-fos mRNA expression (Northern blotting) correlates with nocifensive behavior following pretreatment with morphine, the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine, or their respective antagonists naloxone and atipamezole. Both opiate and alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists reduced formalin-induced c-fos gene transcription and nocifensive behavior via their cognate receptors. Unexpectedly, blockade of either the opiate or alpha2-adrenergic receptors, alone, caused an increase in formalin-evoked c-fos mRNA; while blocking the opiate receptor had no effect on formalin-induced behavior, alpha2-adrenoceptor block had an analgesic effect, indicating discordance between c-fos message transcription and nocifensive behavior. We concluded that the formalin-induced spinal c-fos signal was a poor predictor of the behavioral response to pharmacological manipulation of pain processing pathways.

Contribution of peripheral alpha 1A-adrenoceptors to pain induced by formalin or by alpha-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine plus noradrenaline

We examined the peripheral adrenergic mechanisms involved in pain induced by alpha-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (alpha-methyl-5-HT) plus (+/-)-noradrenaline or prostaglandin E2 and by intraplantar formalin. Agents were injected s.c. into the plantar surface of rats' paws, and the paw lifting and licking response scored. Pain produced by alpha-methyl-5-HT (10 micrograms) plus noradrenaline (10 micrograms) was blocked by pretreatment with the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists, phentolamine (10 micrograms) and prazocin HCl (alpha 1; 40 micrograms), but not by timolol (beta; 10 micrograms) or idazoxan (alpha 2; 40 micrograms). Phenylepherine, but not clonidine, substituted for noradrenaline to induce pain when combined with alpha-methyl-5-HT. The alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, WB-4101 (2-(2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl) aminomethyl-1,4-benzodioxane HCl), but not the alpha 1B- adrenoceptor antagonist, chloroethylclonidine, also blocked the pain response produced by alpha-methyl-5-HT plus noradrenaline. Neither of these agents altered pain produced by alpha-methyl-5-HT plus prostaglandin E2 (0.1 microgram). Formalin-induced pain (1%, 50 microliters) was biphasic, and timolol increased the first phase response. The second phase was attenuated by 40% by phentolamine (10 micrograms) injected 10 min before formalin or at the beginning of the second phase; 30 micrograms did not produce a larger effect. Prazosin and WP-4101, but not idazoxan or chloroethylclonidine, also attenuated the second phase. Thus, activation of alpha 1A-adrenoceptors can contribute to pain, but pain induced by alpha-methyl-5-HT plus prostaglandin E2 is independent of adrenergic function, indicating that adrenergic function is not necessary for induction of pain by inflammatory mediators. alpha 1A-Adrenoceptor blockade attenuates pain when administered after development of pain, implying that peripheral adrenergic mechanisms contribute to ongoing maintenance of pain.

Analysis of the mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive effect of the extracts of plants from the genus Phyllanthus

1. We examine some of the mechanisms underlying the analgesic effects of the hydroalcoholic extracts (HE) of Phyllanthus urinaria and P. niruri against formalin-induced nociception in mice. In addition, we also investigate the action of both HEs against capsaicin-mediated pain. 2. Both prazosin and yohimbine (0.15 mg/kg, i.p.) induced a marked inhibition of the analgesic effect caused by phenylephrine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and clonidine (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), respectively, but had no effect on the antinociceptive action caused by HE of P. urinaria (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or P. niruri (30 mg/kg, i.p.). 3. NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG, 75 mg/kg, i.p.) caused marked analgesic effect against the second phase of formalin-induced pain. Treatment of animals with L-arginine (600 mg/kg) completely antagonized the antinociceptive effect of L-NOARG but had no significant effect against the HE of P. urinaria (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or P. niruri (30 mg/kg. i.p.) analgesic properties. 4. The antinociceptive effects caused by the HEs of P. urinaria (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and P. niruri (30 mg/kg, i.p.) were unaffected by methysergide (5 mg/kg, i.p.), p-chloro-phenylalanine-methyl-ester (100 mg/kg, i.p., once a day for 4 consecutive days) or after previous adrenalectomy of animals. 5. The HE of P. urinaria and P. niruri given either intraperitoneally (1-30 mg/kg) or orally (25-200 mg/kg) caused marked and dose-related inhibition of capsaicin-induced pain with ID50 of 2.1 and 6.1 mg/kg given intraperitoneally and 39 and 35 mg/kg given orally, respectively.

Caffeine antinociception in the rat hot-plate and formalin tests and locomotor stimulation: involvement of noradrenergic mechanisms

The present study examined antinociception produced by systemic administration of caffeine in the rat hot-plate (HP) and formalin tests and addressed several aspects of the mechanism of action of caffeine. Locomotor activity was monitored throughout. Caffeine produced a dose-related antinociception the HP (50-100 mg/kg) and formalin tests (12.5-75 mg/kg). When observed during the formalin test, caffeine stimulated locomotor activity between 12.5 and 50 mg/kg; this was followed by a depression in activity at 75 mg/kg. Caffeine did not produce an anti-inflammatory effect as determined by hindpaw plethysmometry, suggesting that antinociception was not secondary to an anti-inflammatory action. Peripheral co-administration of caffeine with the formalin did not produce antinociception, suggesting a predominant central rather than peripheral site of action for caffeine. Naloxone (10 mg/kg) did not reduce the antinociceptive or locomotor stimulant effects of caffeine, suggesting a lack of involvement of endogenous opioids in these actions. Phentolamine (5 mg/kg) enhanced antinociception by caffeine in both the HP and formalin tests, but inhibited locomotor stimulation. Prazosin (0.15 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on locomotor stimulation, but idazoxan (0.5 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on antinociception in the formalin test. These observations suggest an involvement of different alpha-adrenergic receptors in the two actions of phentolamine. Microinjection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the locus coeruleus, which depleted noradrenaline (NA) in the spinal cord and forebrain, inhibited the action of caffeine in the HP test. This was mimicked by intrathecal 6-OHDA which depleted NA in the spinal cord, but not by microinjection of 6-OHDA into the dorsal bundle which depleted NA in the forebrain. These results suggest an integral involvement of noradrenergic mechanisms in the antinociceptive action of caffeine in the HP and formalin tests and in locomotor stimulation, but the nature of this involvement differs for the 3 end points.

Antinociceptive effects of intrathecal administration of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists and clonidine in the formalin test in the mouse

The hypothesis that the descending noradrenergic system tonically inhibits nociception at the spinal level was investigated, using the formalin test in mice. The alpha-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine (0.46 and 0.92 microgram), injected intrathecally, significantly reduced licking activity in both the early and late phase of the test. The alpha 1-antagonist prazosin (3.75, 7.5 and 15 micrograms) and the alpha 2-antagonist yohimbine (7.5 micrograms) also significantly reduced licking activity in both phases. The smaller doses of yohimbine (1.87 and 3.75 micrograms) induced an insignificant reduction of licking in the early phase. Except for the largest doses of clonidine (0.92 microgram), the drugs used had no effect on the general level of activity and motor performance. These results support previous findings that increased noradrenergic activity in the spinal cord inhibits nociception, however, this inhibition seems not to be tonically active. The mechanisms of the antinociceptive actions of alpha-antagonists are not clear.