Induction of systemic and local basophil and eosinophil responses in guinea pigs by the feeding of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans

Immunization of rabbits with Glossina pallidipes tsetse fly midgut proteins: Effects on the fly and trypanosome transmission

Proteins isolated from the midgut of Glossina pallidipes were used to immunize rabbits and their efficacy as vaccine candidate(s) against the fly, and their potential to block transmission of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense assessed. Two fractions, detergent (DET) and aqueous (AQ) fractions were separated using a non-ionic detergent (Triton X-114) and a series of bioassay experiments carried out using serum obtained from rabbits immunized with either of the two fractions. The mortality rates of tsetse flies fed on serum from rabbits immunized with DET and AQ was 56 and 35%, respectively, as compared to 20% mortality in controls. The DET antigen(s) caused considerably higher mortality (chi(2)=1.194, P<0.05) than that on controls. These findings suggest that midgut proteins contain antigens that are lethal to tsetse flies, and are potential candidates for the development of anti-tsetse vaccine. When flies fed on serum derived from DET immunized rabbits were fed on T. b. rhodesiense infected blood, only 20% of them picked the infection. Very few flies (20%) fed on serum derived from DET immunized rabbits had infection of T. b. rhodesiense. In the control flies 45% of them had infection in the midgut with a higher and actively motile parasite load. Assessment of fecundity indicated significantly higher (chi(2)=2.117, P<0.05) larviposition for the control flies when compared to the AQ group of flies (chi(2)=1.054, P<0.05). Significant differences in abortions and pupal weights were also observed. These results suggest that midgut proteins contain antigens with potential for use in development of vaccine to block transmission of trypanosomes through tsetse.

Do basophils play a role in immunity against parasites?

The link between parasites and eosinophilia has been known for more than a century, although the role of eosinophils in host protection is still an open issue. Much less appreciated, however, is the concurrent systemic induction of a related cell type, the basophil, in parasitized hosts. To date, little is known about the role of basophils in immunity against parasites, but recent evidence points to a possible crucial role in the initiation of T-helper type 2 responses in the host. In this article, we review the current understanding of parasitic infections and basophils and discuss their putative role in immunity.

Lesions and saliva-specific antibody responses in rabbits with immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to the bites of Glossina morsitans centralis

Rabbits exposed to feeding tsetse flies developed cutaneous hypersensitivity responses to fly bites. These responses had characteristics of immediate and delayed type hypersensitivity. Saliva components from the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans centralis were electrophoretically separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Major salivary proteins of 160, 92, 66, 64, 55, 42, 33, 28, and 15 kilodaltons were identified. Separated salivary components were transferred to nitrocellulose filters and probed with lectins and with whole sera and purified IgG from rabbits which had been exposed, via fly feeding, to tsetse antigens for variable periods. Many of the salivary proteins were identified as glycoproteins. Several major salivary proteins were recognized by antibodies from sensitized rabbits.

Xenopsylla cheopis: cellular expression of hypersensitivity in guinea pigs

Guinea pigs multiply exposed to Xenopsylla cheopis adult fleas exhibited marked blood basophil responses to challenge infestation with only minor changes in blood eosinophil levels. Dermal responses to flea feeding were marked by dominant neutrophil (52% of the infiltrate) and eosinophil (32%) accumulations 24 hr after primary feeding, with a weak basophil response (11%). However, after challenge feeding 14 days later, eosinophils dominated, representing 59% of the infiltrate with basophils comprising 30% of the cellular response; neutrophils were rare (7%). Mast cells did not exhibit any increases in density during either the primary or secondary infestation, representing 4-7% of the infiltrate. These results demonstrate that flea feeding induces systemic and local basophil responses as demonstrated for all hematophagous arthropods examined so far. Flea feeding success was not adversely affected by feeding on homologously hypersensitized guinea pigs or guinea pigs sensitized by Ornithodoros parkeri feeding. However, basophil responses at flea feeding sites in heterologous (tick) sensitized animals were more basophilic (26 +/- 4 cells/0.03-mm2 area) than feeding sites in homologous (flea) sensitized hosts (9 +/- 6 cells). Furthermore, primary tick feeding sites become erythematous and indurated after flea feeding on the opposite flank, and were marked histologically by strong basophil abscess (276 +/- 56 cells/0.03-mm2 area); primary flea feeding sites were not activated by tick challenge feeding. These cross-generic challenge feeding experiments suggest antigen cross-reactivity, resulting in activation of feeding sites of a heterologous arthropod.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)