An evaluation of Aquaphor Gauze dressing in burned children

DuoDERM hydroactive dressing versus silver sulphadiazine/Bactigras in the emergency treatment of partial skin thickness burns

The study compared DuoDERM Burn Pack Hydroactive Dressings (DHD) with silver sulphadiazine/Bactigras dressings (SSD/Bactigras) in the outpatient management of small partial skin thickness burns. Forty-eight patients were entered into the study, and randomly allocated into either the DHD or SSD/Bactigras group. Burn wounds were followed until complete re-epithelialization occurred. There were no statistical differences between the groups, either with respect to their composition or characteristics of healing in days, and patients' subjective responses to treatment. However, application was easier in the DHD group (93 per cent), compared with 71 per cent in the SSD/Bactigras group (P = 0.0009), and the SSD/Bactigras were easier to remove (96 per cent) versus DHD (66 per cent, P = 0.0004). Furthermore, the DHD group had significantly less dressing changes; a mean of three changes per subject in the DHD group compared with eight in the SSD/Bactigras group (P = 0.117). Two burn wounds became infected in the DHD group, and one in the SSD/Bactigras group. In this study both modalities were found to be equally suitable and effective for small partial skin thickness burns.

Silver sulphadiazine and the healing of partial thickness burns: a prospective clinical trial

A clinical trial was devised to determine whether the healing of partial thickness burns was retarded by the use of silver sulphadiazine cream (SSD) compared with simple, non-bacteriocidal dressings. Biopsy-confirmed partial thickness burns of at least 2% confluent area were dressed according to a strict protocol to compare the rate of epithelialisation of the control dressing, tulle gras, with that obtained with the use of silver sulphadiazine. The same comparative dressing regimen was carried out on a series of split thickness graft donor sites. Twenty such donor sites and fifteen burn areas were admitted to the trial. The mean time to healing of SSD-treated burn areas was longer than that for tulle gras; the difference when analysed by paired t-test was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). There was very little difference in the compared healing rates of the donor sites, which implies that SSD does not retard epithelialisation of dermal depth injuries but rather that the delayed healing is a unique response of the partial thickness burn wound to the presence of SSD. A review of the relevant literature is included in the discussion.