How should nausea be assessed in patients receiving chemotherapy?

Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting - past reflections, present practice and future management

Although much progress has occurred in the last decade regarding the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, these remain among the most intolerable side-effects of treatment and patients continue to report the negative impact such symptoms have on their ability to enjoy life. Inadequate control of nausea and vomiting reduces patients' quality of life and functional status and jeopardizes the delivery of optimal treatment, so making its management a priority for oncology health care workers. This article will reflect on past and present evidence regarding the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting while highlighting some of the most recent scientific advances before drawing conclusions about the future management of this troublesome symptom for patients receiving chemotherapy.

Progress in reducing nausea and emesis. Comparisons of ondansetron (Zofran), granisetron (Kytril), and tropisetron (Navoban)

BACKGROUND

Nausea and vomiting are the most distressing side effects associated with the administration of chemotherapy for neoplastic diseases. Nausea, in particular, often had been ignored in studies of chemotherapy side effects. Recently, progress has been made in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, due, in part, to a better understanding of the physiologic mechanisms involved.

METHODS

This paper reviews recent advances in the control of emesis, focusing on pharmacologic treatments.

RESULTS

The efficacy and safety of the serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron in the control of acute and delayed emesis and emesis induced by repeat-cycle chemotherapy are summarized. Although differences in study design and definitions of response criteria have made it difficult to compare the studies that have evaluated these three agents, the overall body of literature supports several clinical findings.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) The 5HT3 antiemetic agents have been shown to be clinically more effective in the control of nausea and emesis than previously used agents. (2) No one of the three has demonstrated consistently greater efficacy. (3) Efficacy appears to be more pronounced for cisplatin-containing regimens than for moderate or less emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. (4) Effectiveness of the 5HT3 agents appears to be less for delayed nausea and emesis than for acute symptoms. Potential control of anticipatory nausea and emesis has not been investigated. (5) Control over nausea appears to be significantly less than control over emesis. In the studies in which it has been measured, nausea control remains incomplete for approximately half the patients given 5HT3 agents. (6) The efficacy of the agents appears to diminish across repeated days and, perhaps, across repeated chemotherapy cycles. (7) The addition of a steroid such as dexamethasone increases the efficacy of both 5HT3 and other antiemetic agents. This effect also seems to apply to delayed nausea and emesis.

A double-blind, randomised, crossover comparison of granisetron and ondansetron in 5-day fractionated chemotherapy: assessment of efficacy, safety and patient preference. The Granisetron Study Group

We report the first double-blind, randomised, crossover study comparing granisetron and ondansetron as antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy. Patients receiving two cycles of identical chemotherapy fractionated over 5 days were given either granisetron (3 mg/day) or ondansetron (24 mg/day) on each day of chemotherapy, using a double-dummy technique to preserve study blindness. Patients then crossed over to the other therapy. 309 patients (237 male) completed the crossover: 260 received cisplatin (mean dose 19.2 mg/m2/day) and 49 received ifosfamide (mean dose 1415 mg/m2/day). Primary efficacy variables were prospectively defined as complete response (no vomiting and mild or absent nausea) over 5 days, and patient preference. Both agents achieved good control of emetic symptoms with 5-day complete response rates of 44.0% on granisetron and 39.8% on ondansetron [95% confidence interval (CI) for odds ratio 0.8, 1.9]. Complete response rates were very similar in patients receiving either cisplatin (40.8% granisetron, 37.6% ondansetron) or ifosfamide (61.2% granisetron, 51.0% ondansetron). There was a statistically significant difference in patient preference in favour of granisetron, 105 patients preferred granisetron, 79 preferred ondansetron, 121 had no preference (P = 0.048: 95% CI for odds ratio 1.00, 1.84). Single daily doses of granisetron (3 mg/day) appeared similarly effective and well tolerated to three daily doses of ondansetron (8 mg three times daily) in prevention of emesis induced by 5-day fractionated chemotherapy, however, significantly more patients preferred granisetron.