Cell biological factors associated with the response of breast cancer to systemic treatment

Effect of Octreotide on Neuroenolase Levels in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and Background

The somatostatin analog octreotide has an antiproliferative effect on small cell lung cancer lines in vitro and in experimental xenograft transplantation systems in vivo. Thus it is worth investigating octreotide activity in the clinical setting.

Methods

We studied the effect of octreotide (200 μg three times a day subcutaneously for seven days) on serum levels of the tumor marker neuroenolase in 13 patients with small cell lung cancer.

Results

A decrease in neuroenolase levels was observed at day 7 during octreotide treatment, with a mean ± SD of 32.6 ± 42.0 ng/ml compared to basal values of 44.4 ± 57.7 ng/ml and to washout values of 50.3 ± 65.7 ng/ml ( P < 0.03).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that octreotide is effective in reducing neuroenolase levels in small cell lung cancer patients. These data suggest a possible role for octreotide in the treatment of this kind of tumor.

Testing for HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Continuing Evolution

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an important prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer. HER2 is overexpressed in approximately 15%–20% of invasive breast carcinomas and is associated with earlier recurrence, shortened disease free survival, and poor prognosis. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) a “humanized” monoclonal antibody targets the extracellular domain of HER2 and is widely used in the management of HER2 positive breast cancers. Accurate assessment of HER2 is thus critical in the management of breast cancer. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of HER2 with reference to its discovery and biology, clinical significance, prognostic value, targeted therapy, current and new testing modalities, and the interpretation guidelines and pitfalls.

Her2 and Progesterone Receptor Status Are Not Predictive of Response to Fulvestrant Treatment

PURPOSE

It has been hypothesized that response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on Her2 and progesterone receptor status, grading, and tumor proliferation rate. In this study, we evaluated factors that are potentially predictive of response and time to progression in patients treated with fulvestrant.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

One hundred fifty-five patients were included and followed prospectively. Patients received fulvestrant at standard dose by i.m. injection. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was done to evaluate factors potentially influencing response and time to progression.

RESULTS

We observed a partial response in 19 patients (12.3%), stable disease > or =6 months in 56 patients (36.1%), stable disease >3 months but <6 months in 7 patients (4.5%), and progressive disease in 73 patients (47.1%). Median time to progression was 5 months, and median overall survival was 27 months. Probability of achieving clinical benefit was significantly associated with a low proliferation rate (P = 0.015), nonvisceral metastatic sites (P = 0.023), and first-line therapy (P = 0.023). First-line therapy was also associated with prolonged time to progression (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Response rate and time to progression are shown to be independent of Her2 status, grading, and progesterone receptor status. This is probably caused by the unique mechanism of action associated with fulvestrant: Due to receptor down-regulation, it blocks nuclear, cytoplasmatic, and membrane-bound estrogen receptor. Therefore, it seems to inhibit the cross-talk between growth factor receptor signaling and estrogen receptor in a more effective manner.

Thymidine labeling index: prognostic role in breast cancer

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of thymidine labeling index in patients with breast cancer. Cellular proliferation rates in 155 breast cancer specimens were investigated by 3H-thymidine labeling index (3H-TLI). Median age was 47 years (range: 23-76). At presentation, 11 patients (7.1%) had stage I disease, 76 (49%) had stage II, 64 (41.3%) had stage III disease, and 4 (2.6%) had metastatic involvement. Patients were placed in 2 groups based on their proliferative indices. The cut-off level was assigned as the median TLI value of the whole group. Correlations between proliferative activity of the tumors based on 3H-TLI levels and various previously established prognostic factors, as well as the influence of proliferative activity on survival as a clinical outcome, were analyzed. The mean and median TLI values for the whole group of patients were 4.36 +/- 4.96% and 2.76% (range: 0-23.6), respectively. There was a significant association of nuclear grade with TLI (P = 0.04). Patients who were alive with no sign of disease at the final follow-up examination had a significantly lower median TLI rate than those who were either alive with disease or those who had eventually died with disease progression (3.7% versus 1.9%, respectively; P = 0.04). Patients with locally advanced disease (N2 + N3 involvement) had a significantly higher median TLI rate than those with local nodal involvement (N1) (3.4% versus 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.026). Furthermore, TLI levels showed a significant association with overall survival in patients with node-negative disease (P = 0.02). Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that TLI plays a significant prognostic role in a subset of patients with node-negative breast cancer. Furthermore, TLI appears to have a predictive value for the clinical outcome of patients with breast cancer. These findings may justify a more aggressive therapeutic approach in patients with high TLI levels. Further large-scale, prospective studies are required before a definite conclusion can be reached.reached.

c-erbB-2 in breast cancer: development of a clinically useful marker

c-erbB-2 amplification and/or overexpression occurs in 20% to 30% of breast cancers and appear to be associated with a more aggressive phenotype. Detecting abnormalities in c-erbB-2 might provide important clinical information for breast cancer patients. However, several of the potential clinical uses of c-erbB-2 remain unproven. Many variables influence c-erbB-2 results, including selection and characteristics of test populations and methods of analysis. Current literature suggests two roles for c-erbB-2, either as a pure prognostic factor with no association with therapy or as a factor predictive of benefit from specific types of systemic treatments. c-erbB-2 appears to be only a weak prognostic factor, although some individual studies suggest greater prognostic importance. c-erbB-2 abnormalities appear to predict for relative, but not absolute, resistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive women. When adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated, some studies have indicated that patients with c-erbB-2-positive cancers (by immunohistochemistry [IHC] or fluoresence in situ hybridization [FISH]) receive more benefit from anthracycline-containing regimens as compared to alkylating agents. c-erbB-2 testing appears critical for selecting patients with metastatic disease who should receive the anti-c-erbB-2 antibody, trastuzumab. Prospective randomized clinical trials of trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy are underway. Well-designed, prospective, randomized clinical trials (designed to test the value of c-erbB-2) or formal meta-analyses will help to better establish the predictive role of c-erbB-2 in breast cancer.

Her-2/neu and breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States in the year 2000. The proto-oncogene Her-2/neu (c-erb-B2) has become an increasingly important prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer. Overexpression/amplification of the Her-2/neu has been associated with a worse outcome in patients with breast cancer. Herceptin, a "humanized" murine monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the Her-2/neu protein, is being used to treat breast cancer that overexpresses Her-2/neu. The status of Her-2/neu in the tumor has become a critical factor in the management strategy of a breast cancer patient. The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of all aspects of Her-2/neu in breast cancer, including biology, prognostic and predictive value, targeted Herceptin therapy, and the laboratory testing of Her-2/neu.

When is a tumor marker ready for prime time? A case study of c-erbB-2 as a predictive factor in breast cancer

PURPOSE

c-erbB-2 (HER-2, c-neu) might play a role as a predictive factor in breast cancer. However, the clinical utility of the marker in this disease is still not established. We conducted a critical analysis of the literature, in which we reviewed the factors that contribute to the lack of acceptance of c-erbB-2 for clinical use and attempted to determine the predictive role of c-erbB-2 for response to specific therapies.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE literature search using the keywords c-erbB-2, HER2, neu, and breast cancer, reviewed the references included in each publication, and reviewed abstracts that have been reported in the 1997-2000 proceedings to the American Association of Cancer Research and American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings.

RESULTS

The preclinical and clinical data reported to date suggest that amplification or overexpression of c-erbB-2 is a weak to moderate negative pure prognostic factor. c-erbB-2 seems to be a weak to moderate negative predictive factor for response to endocrine therapy. The marker is also a moderate negative predictive factor for response to alkylating agents and a moderate positive predictive factor for response to anthracyclines. The data regarding response to taxanes or radiotherapy are not sufficient to make recommendations regarding treatment decision making. Finally, c-erbB-2 is a strong predictive factor for response to trastuzumab.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, in the adjuvant setting, c-erbB-2 status should not be used to determine whether a woman should receive adjuvant systemic therapy (weak prognostic factor). In addition, c-erbB-2 status should not be used to determine whether a patient should receive endocrine therapy. When adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended, anthracycline-based therapy should be the preferred regimen for c-erbB-2-positive patients. However, when anthracyclines are contraindicated, alkylating agent-based therapy should not be withheld. To determine the true predictive role and strength of the marker for response to each therapy, prospective randomized clinical trials or formal meta-analyses are required.

c-erbB2 expression predicts tamoxifen efficacy in breast cancer patients

c-erbB2 is a proto-oncogene that encodes the trans-membrane protein p185. This protein shares considerable sequence and structure homology with members of the epidermal growth factor receptor family and it is believed to cooperate with these receptors in the signal transduction process in order to control cell proliferation. Overexpression of c-erbB2, with or without gene amplification, is frequently found in breast cancer, and a body of evidence suggests it is implicated in the development of resistance to the antiestrogen tamoxifen. Scientific evidence strongly supports a correlation between c-erbB2 overexpression and lack of efficacy of tamoxifen in both advanced and adjuvant settings. However, given the important therapeutic repercussion of this topic, further studies are required before c-erbB2 evaluation can be routinely used to select patients who are likely to benefit from tamoxifen administration.

Overexpression of c-erbB2 is an independent marker of resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer

The present study investigated the interaction between c-erbB2 overexpression and the response to first-line endocrine therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. The primary tumours of 241 patients who were treated at first relapse with endocrine therapy were assessed for overexpression of c-erbB2 by immunohistochemistry. c-erbB2 was overexpressed in 76 (32%) of primary breast cancers and did not correlate with any other prognostic factor. The overall response to treatment and time to progression were significantly lower in patients with c-erbB2-positive tumours compared to those that were c-erbB2-negative (38% vs 56%, P = 0.02; and 4.1 months vs 8.7 months, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, c-erbB2 status was the most significant predictive factor for a short time to progression (P = 0.0009). In patients with ER-positive primary tumours treated at relapse with tamoxifen (n = 170), overexpression of c-erbB2 was associated with a significantly shorter time to progression (5.5 months vs 11.2 months, P < 0.001). In conclusion, overexpression of c-erbB2 in the primary tumour is an independent marker of relative resistance to first-line endocrine therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. In patients with ER-positive primary tumours, the overexpression of c-erbB2 defines a subgroup less likely to respond to endocrine therapy.

Predictive value of SRC-1 for tamoxifen response of recurrent breast cancer

Tamoxifen causes an objective response in about one-third of metastatic breast cancer and in only half of the breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors. Steroid-receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) appears to be a general coactivator for steroid receptors and rate limiting factor necessary for efficient ER transactivation. We aimed to evaluate whether SRC-1 expression is an additional factor for prediction of response to first-line tamoxifen therapy in patients who developed recurrent disease. Here for the first time, we report on SRC-1 expression using a semi-quantitative RT-PCR in 21 primary breast tumors, seven mammary tumor cell-lines, 12 fibroblast cultures, and six normal breast tissues. The highest levels of SRC-1 were observed in normal tissues, intermediate levels in tumor tissues, and the lowest levels in breast tumor cell-lines. There was no relationship between the levels of SRC-1 in these primary tumors and the proportion of tumor cells within the surgical samples, nor with ER status. The median SRC-1 level was, however, lower in tumors from patients that did not respond to tamoxifen. Our findings suggest that high levels of SRC-1 indicate a favorable response to tamoxifen of patients with recurrent breast cancer.

Axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a decision analysis of T1 lesions

BACKGROUND

The value of routine axillary dissection for patients with breast cancer is still being debated. The argument centers around whether the information gained by knowing the lymph node status, which aids in making the decision about adjuvant chemotherapy, justifies the morbidity. This study quantitatively analyzes the potential outcomes of routine, selective, and no axillary dissection.

METHODS

A decision analysis was performed of the strategies of lumpectomy and radiation versus simple mastectomy followed by no dissection, selective dissection, or routine dissection. Factors included biologic markers to identify high-risk lesions, the morbidity of axillary dissection, the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive disease, and the life expectancy of patients with high-risk and low-risk node-negative and node-positive lesions. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine threshold levels of these factors in choosing an option.

RESULTS

We discovered an advantage in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for no axillary dissection until the probability of positive lymph nodes reaches >15%; after that, selective node dissection is superior. Selective dissection is superior for lower morbidity rates of axillary dissection. Routine dissection is never a superior strategy. The difference among these strategies is small, however, with no one strategy providing a QALE greater than 1 year longer than any other.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary dissection can be avoided in patients with high-risk lesions who would be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of lymph node status, and possibly in patients with low-risk T1a lesions, but it should be recommended for low-risk T1b and T1c lesions for which lymph node status may determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy.

The prognostic significance of expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) in primary breast cancer

In the present study, we determined the frequency and intensity of MRP protein expression by monoclonal antibody immunohistochemistry in a series of 259 resected invasive primary breast carcinomas, and we evaluated MRP immunoreactivity in relation to patient and tumour characteristics, relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The immunostaining was graded on a semiquantitative scale that ranged from (-) to ( ). Overall, 34% of the tumours were positive for anti-MRP antibody: 19% showed weak cytoplasmic staining (+), 14% had clear cytoplasmic staining (++) and only 1% of the tumours had a strong cytoplasmic as well as membranous staining ( ). MRP expression was not related to patient's age, menopausal status, tumour size, differentiation grade, oestrogen and progesterone receptor level or lymph node involvement. In an exploratory univariate analysis of all patients, only primary tumour size and number of lymph nodes involved were significantly associated with shortened RFS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 respectively) and OS (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001 respectively). In Cox univariate analysis for RFS in subgroups of patients stratified by menopausal status, tumour size, nodal status, adjuvant systemic therapy and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status, MRP expression was associated with increased risk for failure in patients with small tumours (T1), in node-negative patients and in node-positive patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF); the relative hazard rate (RHR) for relapse was increased in the presence of MRP, with RHR values with 95% confidence limits (CL) of 2.8 (1.2-6.9), 2.1 (1.0-4.2) and 2.8 (0.8-9.9) respectively. In analysis for OS, expression of MRP was also associated with increased risk for failure in patients with small tumours (T1) [RHR (95% CL) 2.3 (0.9-6.0)] and in node-positive patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with CMF [RHR (95% CL) 3.7 (0.8-17.1)] but not in node-negative patients [RHR (95% CL) 1.1 (0.4-2.6)]. In conclusion, our results show that MRP is frequently overexpressed in primary breast cancer and suggest that MRP expression might be of prognostic significance in the subgroups of patients with the more favourable prognosis, i.e. patients with small tumours and node-negative patients, as well as in the setting of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. In primary breast cancer, MRP might be related to altered cell biological behaviour, including a more aggressive phenotype, and resistance to adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.

Predictive value of c-erbB-2, p53, cathepsin-D and histology of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer

The value of various prognostic factors in breast cancer patients has been determined in a number of studies. Few reports have been published on the dependence of treatment outcome on histological and immunohistochemical characteristics in the primary tumour in patients with metastatic disease. We studied the incidence and prognostic value of histological and molecular abnormalities in the primary tumour of patients who had developed metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients received a fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen either once a week or once every 4 weeks. Adequate specimens for various analyses were available from 127 patients. Median follow-up time of the patients ranged from 15 to 101 months. In this study, the histological grade of the malignancy best predicted response to chemotherapy (P < 0.0005). Most of the responses were observed in patients with grade 1 tumours; in this group, time to progression was delayed. C-erb B-2 gene amplification and oncoprotein expression had no predictive value. Neither p53 nor cathepsin-D predicted treatment outcome after chemotherapy. None of the factors had an effect on overall survival. Among breast cancer patients who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, response to treatment correlated with histological grade. In patients with histological grade 1 breast cancer, the time to progression was longest. However, overall survival was not affected by histological grade nor the other parameters tested. In addition to histological grade, other prognostic factors that are not included in this study need to be identified to determine which patients with metastatic breast cancer would benefit from cytotoxic treatment.

FISH detection of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in early onset breast cancer

HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) gene amplification based on Southern blotting or immunohistochemistry has been shown to be predictive of poor outcome in breast cancer occurring in women over 40, but there is little data on the role of HER-2/neu in young women with breast cancer, many of whom may have inherited BRCA1 or other predisposing genes. The present study used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on archival specimens of breast cancer from 37 women under the age of 40 to evaluate the role of HER-2/neu amplification in this cohort, and to also evaluate the efficacy of FISH for quantifying amplification. The frequency of primary tumors with a greater than fourfold increase in gene copy number was found to be 38%, which is similar to the frequency of amplification reported in Southern blot studies in older women. However, the greater sensitivity of FISH enabled detection of low level amplification (more than 2 but less than 8 gene copies), which was found in an additional 30% of the tumors. Patients with low level amplification demonstrated a 54% recurrence rate, compared to 86% in those with high amplification and 17% in those with no amplification. HER-2/neu amplification appeared to be more prognostic of recurrence than nodal status, with 45% of node negative tumors recurring compared to 62% of those which were node positive, nor was tumor size predictive of recurrence in this cohort since tumors of 2 cm or less recurred in 44% of cases compared to 57% of those larger than 2 cm. Thus, this study demonstrates that FISH is a reproducible and sensitive technique for detecting HER-2/neu amplification, and that amplification of the oncogene is the strongest independent indicator of recurrence of breast cancer in young women.

Comparative analysis of the sensitivity of endometrial cancer cells to epidermal growth factor and steroid hormones

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and EGF-regulated processes play an important role in steroid signal transduction. Comparative analysis of EGF and steroid receptor expression and the sensitivity of early stages of proliferation induction, such as activation of phospholipid turnover to EGF and steroids, may provide a useful new approach to characterizing the sensitivity of endometrial cancer to hormone therapy.

METHODS

Progesterone (PR), estradiol (ER), and EGF receptor (EGFR) content was measured by radioligand competitive methods in surgically excised tumors from 26 patients with primary endometrial cancer. In short term cell cultures isolated from 11 of these tumors, the influence of a 10-minute treatment with 10(-8)M EGF either alone or combined with 10(-8)M progesterone on 32P-incorporation into phospholipids was studied. Phospholipids were fractionated by thin-layer chromatography and were located by autoradiography, and quantification of the labeled compounds was made by densitometric scanning of the autoradiograms.

RESULTS

Epidermal growth factor receptor was found in 15 of 26 (58%) endometrial cancer samples. Eighty-two percent of the tumors studied contained PR, and 81% contained ER. No significant correlations were revealed between EGFR and ER/PR status or concentration. Epidermal growth factor stimulated 32P-incorporation by more than 120% of the control level in five of seven EGFR-positive and in one of four EGFR-negative endometrial cancer samples. An inverse relationship was revealed between EGFR content and the percentage of EGF-induced stimulation of phospholipid turnover in endometrial cancer cells (r = -0.6; P = 0.15) and between EGFR content in EGFR-positive samples and the extent of progesterone suppression of EGF-induced turnover (r = -0.77; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of EGF sensitivity on a receptor and a functional level may provide important additional information about the hormonal sensitivity of endometrial cancer.

Anthracycline resistance in breast cancer: clinical applications of current knowledge

Anthracyclines are highly effective antineoplastic agents for the treatment of breast cancer. Nevertheless, essentially all breast cancer patients have tumours which are intrinsically resistant or which develop resistance during the course of therapy. Clinical trials provide indirect information on the nature of anthracycline resistance and work in the basic sciences has demonstrated molecular mechanisms which play a role. Initial clinical attempts to exploit and translate these mechanisms to predict, and interfere with, anthracycline resistance have met with mixed success, and have not yet led to accepted clinical applications.

The c-erbB-2 proto-oncogene as a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer: a paradigm for the development of other macromolecular markers--a review

Seven years after the initial studies of the prognostic value of the proto-oncogene c-erbB-2 in breast cancer, its role is still being defined. The interpretation of studies on the use of this gene and its protein product in prognostic and predictive tests for breast cancer is complicated by multiple methodologies and the inherent difficulties in the studies. The work has moved beyond the stage at which small studies with short follow-up (useful for hypothesis generation) are of value, to the stage in which large studies with sufficient statistical power to find significant correlations are central. These larger studies do not lend support for the use of c-erbB-2 in the evaluation of axillary-node-negative patients, the group of breast cancer patients for whom refinement of prognostic estimates is now most important. There are, however, hints that c-erbB-2 may have value in predicting response to certain treatments, though the studies so far are too few, often too small and too conflicting to reliably confirm this.

Relationship of PS2 with response to tamoxifen therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer

PS2, an oestrogen-inducible protein, was measured in the cytosol of 230 primary tumours from patients who were subjected to first-line tamoxifen therapy for advanced disease without prior adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen. PS2 correlated positively with oestrogen receptor (ER, P < 0.01) and progesterone receptor content (PgR, P < 0.001), and with the length of progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.05). Although not statistically significant, higher levels of PS2 (> or = 10 ng mg-1 protein) were also associated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen treatment and a longer total post-relapse survival (PRS). ER, PgR, menopausal status, site of disease and prior adjuvant chemotherapy were all associated with response to tamoxifen therapy and with PFS. In multivariate analysis for PFS, low levels of ER and PgR, visceral metastasis, a disease-free interval of less than 1 year and prior adjuvant chemotherapy were all significantly associated with an increased probability of a rapid disease progression after start of tamoxifen therapy. In the subset of 83 tumours with intermediate levels of ER and PgR (both > or = 10, but not both > or = 75 fmol mg-1 protein), PS2 was positively related with the length of PFS (P < 0.01) and PRS (P < 0.05). PS2 remained the strongest factor in multivariate analysis for PFS (P < 0.01) in this ER/PgR intermediate subgroup, but was not of predictive value in univariate or multivariate analysis for both PFS and PRS in tumours classified as ER/PgR low or high (> or = 75 fmol mg-1 protein). It is concluded that PS2 status may be used as a parameter, additional to ER and PgR, for better refinement of prediction of response to tamoxifen treatment in advanced breast cancer patients especially with intermediate ER/PgR levels in their primary tumour.

The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in primary breast cancer: results of a 10 year follow-up study

In a study on 214 patients with primary breast cancer (median follow-up 8.5 yr, maximum follow-up 15 yr), EGF-R was negatively correlated to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, whereas no association was found with age, lymph node status, and tumor size. Initially, after a follow-up of 5 yr, there was a tendency to a significant association between EGF-R levels and tumor recurrence rate (p = 0.08). Patients with tumors containing intermediate levels of EGF-R experienced a longer relapse-free survival (RFS) than did patients with tumors possessing lower or higher levels of EGF-R. This effect was most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. However, after 10 yr follow-up, this association appears to be lost (p = 0.28) as shown in this update. A similar phenomenon was observed for the ER. While at 5 yr follow-up ER status had significant prognostic value (p = 0.01), at 10 yr follow-up this significance also appears to be lost (p = 0.40). However, tumor size, lymph node status, grade, and PgR status maintained significant prognostic value by univariate analysis. Based on 40 separate studies comprising 5232 patients, the mean percentage of EGF-R positivity reported in breast cancer is 45% (range 14-91%). Nine out of 15 different studies showed in some way a significant negative association between EGF-R and RFS by univariate analysis, and 2 others showed a tendency to such a relationship. Of 7 studies applying multivariate analysis, two demonstrated an independent prognostic value of EGF-R for RFS and two others a tendency to a significant correlation, whereas three did not. It may be concluded that EGF-R status has more or less prognostic value in patients with primary breast cancer, but the prognostic power decreases with longer follow-up. Of great clinical significance is the association of EGF-R with hormone resistance. Therefore EGF-R status can be used for selection of type of treatment. Finally, EGF-R might be useful as a target for new treatment modalities.