Tanaka H, Masumiya H, Sekine T, Sijuku T, Sugahara M, Taniguchi H, Terada M, Saito W, Shigenobu K. Myocardial and vascular effects of efonidipine in vitro as compared with nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem.
GENERAL PHARMACOLOGY 1996;
27:451-4. [PMID:
8723524 DOI:
10.1016/0306-3623(95)02065-9]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
1. Effects of efonidipine on isolated myocardial and aortic preparations were compared with those of nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem. 2. All drugs produced concentration-dependent negative chronotropic effects on isolated guinea-pig atrial preparations. The potency order was efonidipine > or = nifedipine > diltiazem > or = verapamil, EC30 values being 3.08 x 10(-8)M, 3.48 x 10(-8)M, 1.27 x 10(-7)M and 1.47 x 10(-7)M, respectively. 3. Nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem produced concentration-dependent negative inotropic effects on isolated guinea-pig left atrial preparations. The potency order was nifedipine > verapamil > diltiazem, EC30 values being 4.94 x 10(-8)M, 1.49 x 10(-7)M and 8.03 x 10(-7)M, respectively. Efonidipine, even at 1 microM produced no inotropic effect: 10 microM efonidipine decreased the contractile force by about 20%. 4. All drugs concentration-dependently attenuated the KCl-induced contraction of isolated rat aortic ring preparation. The potency order was nifedipine > efonidipine > verapamil > diltiazem, EC30 values being 2.98 x 10(-9)M, 1.24 x 10(-8)M, 3.96 x 10(-8)M and 2.13 x 10(-7)M, respectively. 5. Thus, efonidipine was demonstrated to be a potent vasodilator with negative chronotropic but minimal negative inotropic activity, which may be of benefit in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.
Collapse