Mira JG, Fullerton GD, Ezekiel J, Potter JL. Evaluation of computed tomography numbers for treatment planning of lung cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982;
8:1625-8. [PMID:
7141938 DOI:
10.1016/0360-3016(82)90627-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Computerized tomography numbers (CTN) were evaluated in 32 computerized tomography scans performed on patients with carcinoma of the lung, with the aim of evaluating CTN in normal (lung, blood, muscle, etc) and pathologic tissues (tumor, atelectasis, effusion, post-radiation fibrosis). Our main findings are: 1. Large individual CTN variations are encountered in both normal and pathologic tissues, above and below mean values. Hence, absolute numbers are meaningless. Measurements of any abnormal intrathoracic structure should be compared in relation to normal tissue CTN values in the same scan. 2. Tumor and complete atelectasis have CTN basically similar to soft tissue. Hence, these numbers are not useful for differential diagnosis. 3. Effusions usually have lower CTN and can be distinguished from previous situations. 4. Dosimetry based on uniform lung density assumptions (i.e., 300 mg/cm3) might produce substantial dose errors as lung CTN exhibit very large variations indicating densities well above and below this value. 5. Preliminary information indicates that partial atelectasis and incipient post-radiation fibrosis can have very low CTN. Hence, they can be differentiated from solid tumors in certain cases, and help in differential diagnosis of post radiation recurrence within the radiotherapy field versus fibrosis.
Collapse