Small cell lung cancer 1973-1983: early progress and recent obstacles

Two plasma microRNA panels for diagnosis and subtype discrimination of lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Early and accurate diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial for effective treatment. This study aimed to identify plasma microRNAs for diagnosis of lung cancer and for further discrimination of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma microRNA expression was investigated using three independent cohorts including 1132 participants recruited between October 2008 and September 2014 from five medical centers. The subjects were healthy individuals and patients with NSCLC or SCLC. Microarrays were used to screen 723 human microRNAs in 106 plasma samples for candidate selection. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR was applied to evaluate the expression of selected microRNAs. Two logistic regression models were constructed based on a training cohort (n = 565) and then validated using an independent cohort (n = 461). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Plasma panel A with six microRNAs (miR-17, miR-190b, miR-19a, miR-19b, miR-26b, and miR-375) provided high diagnostic accuracy in discriminating lung cancer patients from healthy individuals (AUC 0.873 and 0.868 for training and validation cohort, respectively). Moreover, plasma panel B with three microRNAs (miR-17, miR-190b, and miR-375) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in discriminating SCLC from NSCLC (AUC 0.878 and 0.869 for training and validation cohort, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We constructed and validated two plasma microRNA panels that have considerable clinical value in diagnosis of lung cancer, and could play an important role in determining optimal treatment strategies based on discrimination between SCLC and NSCLC.

Pilot Study with Adriamycin and Ifosfamide in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Twenty-one patients with limited (12 cases) or extensive (9 cases) small cell lung cancer entered a pilot study with adriamycin (ADM) plus ifosfamide (IFX) as first line treatment for six planned cycles. ADM was administered at the dose of 60 mg/m2 iv push on day 1 and IFX at 3 g/m2/iv in 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 2. To prevent IFX-induced hemorrhagic cystitis, mercaptoethane sulfonate sodium (Mesna) was given after the admnistration of IFX at the dose of 500 mg/m2 by iv push four times (hour 0, 4, 8, 12) on days 1 and 2. In the absence of disease progression, chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. All patients were evaluable for analysis of response, toxicity and survival. The overall response rate clinically and radiologically assessed after four treatment cycles was 95.3% (CR 28.6%, PR 66.7%). However, by continuing the same drug treatment up to the sixth cycle, 7 of 14 partial responders showed tumor progression within the intrathoracic region. Therefore, at the end of the planned chemotherapy program the partial remission rate fell to 33.3%, for a total remission rate of 61.9% and a median total survival of 9 months (range 5 to 36+). The regimen was well tolerated with only one case presenting hemorrhagic cystitis. The results achieved with this drug combination appear comparable to those obtained with other conventional regimens. However, the high response rate achieved after four cycles and the low incidence of marrow toxicity suggest the use of this regimen for a short period with increased dose levels.

SCLC-State of the Art and What Does the Future Have in Store?

Worldwide, the total number of diagnosed lung cancer cases amounts to 1.8 million every year. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for about 15% to 17% of all diagnosed lung cancers. Despite all progress made in the field of non-small-cell lung cancer, the prognosis and therapeutic options in SCLC are still limited. The resistance of SCLC to conventional therapy as well as its high recurrence rate can be attributed to the heterogeneous genetic structure of SCLC; however, a targeted therapy approach to SCLC may build on this very heterogeneous genetic structure. SCLC is by now a well-characterized cancer with various genetic alterations; for example, mutations in tumor suppressor genes TP53 and RB1, alterations in chromosome 3p, JAK2, FGFR1, and MYC genes were discovered. Based on these findings, various treatment options (eg, aurora kinase inhibitors, PARP inhibition, immune checkpoint inhibition and vaccine therapy) are currently evaluated with the goal of determining their clinical effectiveness. In this article, we review the existing knowledge of SCLC genetics and the current treatment standards and highlight new approaches of immunotherapy and other targeted therapies, which may yield new treatment options and improve the outcome of patients with SCLC.

Multimodality Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) occurs in only one third of patients with SCLC, but it is potentially curable. Combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) has long been the mainstay of therapy for this condition, but more recent data suggest a role for surgery in early-stage disease. Prophylactic cranial irradiation seems to improve outcomes in patients who have responded to initial therapy. This review addresses the practical aspects of staging and treatment of patients with limited-stage SCLC.

Genitourinary small cell malignancies: prostate and bladder

Small cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy often associated with dismal prognosis due to the presence of advanced disease. Small cell malignancies, initially described in the lung (small cell carcinoma of the lung), can occur in extrapulmonary sites, such as prostate (small cell carcinoma of the prostate) and bladder (small cell carcinoma of the bladder), with similar clinicopathologic outcomes. There has been a paradigm shift in the management of small cell carcinoma of the lung from initial surgical treatment to use of chemotherapy followed by local therapies. Such treatment modalities have been applied to small cell carcinoma of the prostate and the bladder, with promise in improving patient survival. Use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and/or radiation offers the most benefit. Further investigation at the molecular level may offer targeted therapies earlier in the course of the disease.

Therapeutic procedure in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents 12.95% of all lung cancer diagnoses and continues to be a major clinical problem, with an aggressive clinical course and short disease-free duration after 1st line therapy. Treatment of SCLC remains challenging because of its rapid growth and development of drug resistance during the course of the disease. Chemotherapy remains the current optimal treatment and radical thoracic radiotherapy representing the best treatment option for fit patients with LD. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in patients with good performance status, and the effect of cisplatin is important for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in LD cause of his radiosensitivity. Patients with progress disease after first-line chemotherapy have poor prognosis. Second-line therapy may produce a modest clinical benefit. A number of targeted agents have been investigated in LD and ED, mostly in unselected populations, with disappointing results. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended only for patients who had full response to first line chemotherapy, as target of improving overall survival and decreasing possibilities of brain metastases. New factors for target therapy are the hope for the management of this systematic disease. If we identify these targets for treatment of SCLC and overcome drug-resistance mechanisms, we will create new chemo-radiotherapy schedules for future.

Two microRNA panels to discriminate three subtypes of lung carcinoma in bronchial brushing specimens

RATIONALE

Effective treatment for lung cancer requires accuracy in subclassification of carcinoma subtypes.

OBJECTIVES

To identify microRNAs in bronchial brushing specimens for discriminating small cell lung cancer (SCLC) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and for further differentiating squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) from adenocarcinoma (AC).

METHODS

Microarrays were used to screen 723 microRNAs in laser-captured, microdissected cancer cells from 82 snap-frozen surgical lung specimens. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was performed on 153 macrodissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) surgical lung specimens to evaluate seven microRNA candidates discovered from microarrays. Two microRNA panels were constructed on the basis of a training cohort (n = 85) and validated using an independent cohort (n = 68). The microRNA panels were applied as differentiators of SCLC from NSCLC and of SQ from AC in 207 bronchial brushing specimens.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two microRNA panels yielded high diagnostic accuracy in discriminating SCLC from NSCLC (miR-29a and miR-375; area under the curve [AUC], 0.991 and 0.982 for training and validation data set, respectively) and in differentiating SQ from AC (miR-205 and miR-34a; AUC, 0.977 and 0.982 for training and validation data set, respectively) in FFPE surgical lung specimens. Moreover, the microRNA panels accurately differentiated SCLC from NSCLC (AUC, 0.947) and SQ from AC (AUC, 0.962) in bronchial brushing specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

We found two microRNA panels that accurately discriminated between the three subtypes of lung carcinoma in bronchial brushing specimens. The identified microRNA panels may have considerable clinical value in differential diagnosis and optimizing treatment strategies based on lung cancer subtypes.

Phase II trial of oral topotecan and intravenous carboplatin with G-CSF support in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the response rate and toxicities of the combination of oral topotecan and carboplatin in patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Previous studies have suggested improved outcomes with a topoisomerase I inhibitor in combination with a platinum agent.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with previously untreated, ES-SCLC were evaluable in this phase II trial. All patients received oral topotecan 2.0 mg/m per day on days 1 through 5 and carboplatin at an area under curve of 5 on day 5. Treatment was repeated every 21 days up to a total of 6 cycles. All patients received G-CSF.

RESULTS

There were no complete responses and 16 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 62% (95% CI: 41-80). Median time to progression was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4-8), with a median overall survival of 12 months (95% CI: 8-16). This study was closed to accrual early with 26 of a planned 39 patients enrolled because of grade 5 adverse events in 4 (15%) patients (3 neutropenic infections, 1 sudden cardiac death). Eighty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or higher hematologic events. The most common severe nonhematologic events included diarrhea, vomiting, dyspnea, hypoxia, and hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this drug regimen has activity as first-line therapy in ES-SCLC, it is associated with excessive hematologic toxicity, which occurred in spite of growth factor support. Despite promising survival estimates, this particular combination and dose level of oral topotecan and carboplatin cannot be recommended.

Small-cell lung cancer: 8 years experience of a single multidisciplinary team

Aims. We have audited the changes in treatment practice for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) presented to a single multidisciplinary team (MDT) at Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals between January 1998 and December 2005. Materials and Methods. The MDT database was used to identify all patients with SCLC. Anonymised demographic, treatment, and outcome details were extracted from the database supplemented by patient records. Results. 235 patients were identified. 112 (48%) had limited disease at presentation. Chemotherapy was the initial treatment for 195 patients, 77% of whom had a documented radiological response with a complete response in 24%. Chemotherapy regimes evolved during the study period with the increasing use of platinum-based chemotherapy. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was most used before 2004 and was given to 57% of all patients. 42% received consolidation thoracic radiotherapy and 24% prophylactic cranial irradiation. The median and 2-year survival were 8 months and 18%, respectively, for patients with limited disease and 5 months and 5%, respectively, for extensive disease. Conclusion. We have documented changes in treatment practice and service delivery of SCLC over the 8 years during which the MDT has been operating. However, there has not achieve any significant improvement in outcome for the population of patients with SCLC.

Serum level of arginine-vasopressin influences the prognosis of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the influence of serum arginine-vasopressin (AVP) level on prognosis of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the clinical records of 163 patients with ED-SCLC, who were admitted to Okayama University Hospital or National Shikoku Cancer Center Hospital. The influence of 14 pretreatment variables on survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis of 163 patients, elevation of serum LDH level (P = 0.028) and poor performance status (PS > or = 2, P = 0.002) were independent poor prognostic factors. In 34 patients whose serum AVP levels were available, high serum AVP level was related to the poor prognosis (P < 0.001). The serum-sodium level did not affect the survival. Median serum level of osmotic pressure in 34 patients was normal (284.9 mOsm/kg), although, serum osmotic pressure was low in four of six patients with high serum AVP level. In all patients with high serum AVP level, serum LDH level was elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from the current study suggested that serum LDH level and PS were the poor prognostic factors for ED-SCLC. But we additionally identified the prognostic significance of serum AVP level, which may be a more useful factor than serum-sodium level.

Gene expression profiling reveals reproducible human lung adenocarcinoma subtypes in multiple independent patient cohorts

PURPOSE

Published reports suggest that DNA microarrays identify clinically meaningful subtypes of lung adenocarcinomas not recognizable by other routine tests. This report is an investigation of the reproducibility of the reported tumor subtypes.

METHODS

Three independent cohorts of patients with lung cancer were evaluated using a variety of DNA microarray assays. Using the integrative correlations method, a subset of genes was selected, the reliability of which was acceptable across the different DNA microarray platforms. Tumor subtypes were selected using consensus clustering and genes distinguishing subtypes were identified using the weighted difference statistic. Gene lists were compared across cohorts using centroids and gene set enrichment analysis.

RESULTS

Cohorts of 31, 72, and 128 adenocarcinomas were generated for a total of 231 microarrays, each with 2,553 reliable genes. Three adenocarcinoma subtypes were identified in each cohort. These were named bronchioid, squamoid, and magnoid according to their respective correlations with gene expression patterns from histologically defined bronchioalveolar carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large-cell carcinoma. Tumor subtypes were distinguishable by many hundreds of genes, and lists generated in one cohort were predictive of tumor subtypes in the two other cohorts. Tumor subtypes correlated with clinically relevant covariates, including stage-specific survival and metastatic pattern. Most notably, bronchioid tumors were correlated with improved survival in early-stage disease, whereas squamoid tumors were associated with better survival in advanced disease.

CONCLUSION

DNA microarray analysis of lung adenocarcinomas identified reproducible tumor subtypes which differ significantly in clinically important behaviors such as stage-specific survival.

The role of pulmonary resection in small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the outcome of surgical resection for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent thoracotomy for SCLC at our institution from January 1985 to July 2002. All patients were staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system.

RESULTS

The median age of the 77 patients (44 men and 33 women) was 65 years (range, 35-85 years). Operations performed included thoracotomy with biopsy of hilar mass in 10 patients, wedge excision in 30 (6 with talc pleurodesis), segmentectomy in 4, lobectomy in 28, bilobectomy in 3, and pneumonectomy in 2. Mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 50 patients and lymph node sampling in 19. Postoperative therapy Included chemotherapy alone in 20 patients, radiation therapy in 3, and combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in 40. Median tumor diameter was 4 cm (range, 1.0-10.0 cm). Postsurgical tumor stage was IA in 7 patients, IB in 11, IIA in 8, IIB in 7, IIIA in 30, IIIB in 10, and IV in 4. A total of 19 patients (25%) had complications: atrial arrhythmia in 7 patients, pneumonia in 6, prolonged air leak in 3, and myocardial infarction, postoperative bleeding, and cerebrovascular accident in 1 each. Operative mortality was 3% (2/77). Follow-up ranged from 4 days to 170 months (median, 19 months). At last follow-up, 20 patients were alive. The estimated overall 5-year survival was 27% when excluding the 10 patients who underwent a biopsy without additional surgery. Five-year survival for stage I and II combined (n=33) was 38% compared with only 16% for stage III and IV combined (n=34) (P=.02). Overall median survival was 24 months; median survival for patients who underwent curative surgery was 25 months compared with 16 months for those who had a palliative procedure (P=.34).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary resection in patients with stage I or stage II SCLC is safe with low mortality and morbidity. Curative resection is associated with long-term survival in early stage SCLC in some patients and should be considered in selected patients.

Topotecan, an active new antineoplastic agent: review and current status

Topotecan (Hycamtin) is a water soluble semisynthetic analogue of the alkaloid camptothecin which has antitumour activity in preclinical models in vitro and in vivo. A range of Phase I studies has been performed and a daily x 5 iv. schedule, which showed most promising evidence of activity, was selected for extensive clinical evaluation. To date, topotecan has been shown to be active in a number of malignancies, including metastatic ovarian cancer, recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, colorectal cancer and myelodysplastic syndrome. In ovarian cancer, response rates of around 15% were identified in patients who had failed standard chemotherapy, and in a randomised, comparative study with paclitaxel response rates of 20% (topotecan) and 13% (paclitaxel) were observed. In addition, overall time to progression was impressive at 23 weeks (topotecan) compared with 14 weeks (paclitaxel). In recurrent SCLC, topotecan has shown good activity in sensitive patients with a response rate of 39%, although the response rate in refractory patients was considerably lower (7%). Median survival of all patients was 5.4 months, acceptable for this difficult clinical scenario. Topotecan is well-tolerated in the majority of patients and subjective toxicities are uncommon. The principal side-effect is myelosuppression, mainly neutropenia. Serious clinical sequelae are relatively uncommon and non-cumulative. Nonhaematological toxicities are generally mild and not dose-limiting. In clinical use, topotecan has exhibited activity in multiple tumour types, with a side-effect profile that is predictable and manageable. The drug is under evaluation in other tumour types and in combination chemotherapy regimens.

Second-line chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a review

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy, and only a minority of patients survive 2 years. Although this cancer is sensitive to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the majority of patients relapse, and second-line treatment is an option for many. Currently in the United States, the combination of cisplatin/etoposide is the standard first-line therapy in SCLC. At this time, topotecan is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved chemotherapeutic agent for second-line treatment of SCLC. In this paper, we review studies of second-line chemotherapy for SCLC.

Lung cancer--where are we today? Current advances in staging and nonsurgical treatment

Lung cancer remains the commonest cause of cancer death in both men and women in the developed world, although mortality rates for men are dropping. Spiral computed tomography (CT) of the chest in middle-aged, smoking subjects may identify two to four times more lung cancers than a chest X-ray, with more than 70% of tumors being Stage I. The incidence of benign nodules is high, making interpretation difficult. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine whether spiral CT detects lung cancer early enough to improve mortality. Preoperative staging has relied on CT scans, but positron emission tomography scanning has greater sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy than CT and is recommended as the final confirmatory investigation when the CT shows resectable disease. In locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, there is a small advantage for the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy, but no advantage for postoperative radiotherapy. Chemotherapy gives no benefit when given as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment around surgery. In advanced disease, newer cytotoxic agents confer a small survival advantage over older combinations, but the advantage in median survival over best supportive care remains a few months with modest improvements in quality of life. Survival with small cell lung cancer has shown little increase over the last 15 years despite multiple attempts to manipulate the timing, dose intensity of chemotherapy, and the potential of radiotherapy. Novel therapies are urgently needed for all cell types of lung cancer.

Ten-year follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group 8269: a phase II trial of concomitant cisplatin-etoposide and daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To report the long-term follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group-8269, a phase II North American cooperative group trial of concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, vincristine (PEV), and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for limited small-cell lung cancer (L-SCLC).

METHODS

114 eligible patients from 47 institutions enrolled between April, 1985 and March 1986. Patients had documented L-SCLC. Induction chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of PEV. TRT was administered at 1.8 Gy/fraction in 25 daily fractions to a total dose of 45 Gy, to begin concomitantly. Consolidative chemotherapy included two cycles of vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was concurrent with the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy. The PCI dose was 30 Gy in 15 fractions of 2 Gy/fraction.

RESULTS

As of May 2000, 5 of 114 remain alive and progression-free with a minimum follow-up interval of 13.2 years, as of May 2000. The median follow-up interval is 14.2 years. Thirty eight patients died of causes other than SCLC and five patients are still alive and progression-free. Of the remaining 71 patients dying of SCLC, local failure (LF) occurred in 24% (17 patients), distant metastasis (DM) occurred in 35% (25 patients), simultaneous LF and DM occurred in 25% (18 patients), and was indeterminate in 16% (11 patients). Thus, LF was a component of failure in 49%. Twenty patients had the CNS as the initial site of failure. Eleven patients (10%) developed fatal second primary cancers, including two with acute myelogenous leukemia, two with squamous cell lung cancer, one each with breast, pancreas, prostate, renal cell, and myelodysplasia. One patient developed both a melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

There are long-term survivors with concomitant TRT and PEV. LF and DM are common. Pattern of failure suggests needs to improve local and systemic control.

Trends in incidence and prognosis of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe

BACKGROUND

Since the incidence of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in industrialised countries has changed dramatically over the last two decades, we reviewed trends in the incidence and prognosis in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe, according to period of diagnosis and birth cohort and summarized explanations for changes in mortality.

METHODS

Review of the literature based on a computerised search (Medline database 1966-2000).

RESULTS

Although the incidence of lung cancer has been decreasing since the 1970s/1980s among men in North America, Australia, New Zealand and north-western Europe, the age-adjusted rate continues to increase among women in these countries, and among both men and women in southern and eastern Europe. These trends followed changes in smoking behaviour. The proportion of adenocarcinoma has been increasing over time; the most likely explanation is the shift to low-tar filter cigarettes during the 1960s and 1970s. Despite improvement in both the diagnosis and treatment, the overall prognosis for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer hardly improved over time. In contrast, the introduction and improvement of chemotherapy since the 1970s gave rise to an improvement in - only short-term (<2 years) - survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemic of lung cancer is not over yet, especially in southern and eastern Europe. Except for short-term survival of small cell tumours, the prognosis for patients with lung cancer has not improved significantly.

Paclitaxel and G-CSF in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

Paclitaxel is an antimicrotubule agent that interferes with cell division. It has demonstrated promising single-agent activity against non-small-cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of paclitaxel in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The study was designed as a two-stage phase II trial. All patients who entered received paclitaxel by intravenous infusion at a dose of 250 mg/m2 during 24 hours. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor was also provided to ameliorate neutropenia. Cycles were repeated at 21-day intervals. Patients who achieved a complete response received a maximum of 10 cycles of treatment, whereas those who achieved a partial response/regression continued treatment until progression or undue toxicity developed. Patients who progressed or maintained stable disease for six cycles were crossed over to cisplatin and etoposide. Forty-three patients entered the study and all were evaluable for analysis. Responses were observed in 23 (53%) of the patients. There was no significant difference in the response rates in patients with measurable or evaluable disease (13/23 versus 10/20, p = 0.76). At the time of analysis, 39 patients had progressed with a median time to progression of 95 days, and 39 patients had died with a median survival of 278 days. The 1-year achieved survival rate was 24%. Significant neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1,000/microl) occurred in 24 (56%) of the patients, but only 2 patients experienced severe infection (grade > or = 3), and there were no septic deaths. The results indicate that paclitaxel is active against SCLC. Myelosuppression was the main side effect in this patient population. Response duration was short (median = 3.4 months), which suggests that paclitaxel is not sufficient as a single agent. Further studies of paclitaxel in combination with other agents against SCLC are currently in progress within the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and other cancer treatment groups. Key Words: Paclitaxel-G-CSF-Small-cell lung cancer-North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

Role of radiation therapy in the combined-modality treatment of patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: A randomized study

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) chemotherapy (CHT) with or without accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (ACC HFX RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide (CE) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 210 patients were treated with three cycles of standard PE. Patients with a complete response (CR) at both the local and distant levels (CR/CR) or a partial response (PR) at the local level and CR at the distant level (PR/CR) received either thoracic ACC HFX RT with 54 Gy in 36 fractions over 18 treatment days in combination with CE followed by two cycles of PE (group 1, n = 55) or an additional four cycles of PE (group 2, n = 54). Patients who experienced less response were treated nonrandomly (groups 3, 4, and 5). All patients with a CR at the distant level received prophylactic cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

For 206 assessable patients, the median survival time (MST) was 9 months and the 5-year survival rate was 3.4%. Patients in group 1 had significantly better survival rates than those in group 2 (MST, 17 v 11 months; 5-year survival rate, 9.1% v 3.7%, respectively; P =.041). Local control was also better in group 1, but the difference was only marginally not significant (P =.062). There was no difference in distant metastasis-free survival between groups 1 and 2. Acute high-grade toxicity was higher in group 2 than in group 1.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ACC HFX RT to the treatment of the most favorable subset of patients led to improved survival over that obtained with CHT alone.

A case of synchronous double primary lung cancer with neuroendocrine features

We report a case of unique double primary lung cancers with neuroendocrine features in a 63-year-old male smoker. The mass in the left lower lobe (LLL) was a small cell/large cell carcinoma with spindle cell sarcomatous areas and organoid structure. The mass in the left upper lobe (LUL) was a tubular adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features including organoid nests showing occasional rosette formation, nuclear palisading in the periphery of the nests and positive immunoreaction for CD56, chromogranin A and synaptophysin. The difference in histological structures between the two masses led us to diagnose double primary lung cancer. The combination of small cell lung carcinoma and spindle cell carcinoma is very uncommon. The relationship between LLL and LUL tumors remains unclear. Multiple lung cancers with neuroendocrine features have only rarely been reported in the literature. The patient in our case died of widespread cancer 2 years and 4 months after the surgery without adjuvant chemotherapy, a longer postoperative survival time than in cases of ordinary extensive small cell lung cancer. Multiple lung cancers with neuroendocrine features are extremely rare and similar cases have not been reported in the literature. Neuroendocrine differentiation has attracted widespread attention and, therefore, examining neuroendocrine features in lung cancers is important.

Phase II study of high-dose somatostatin analogue in patients either previously treated or untreated who have extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

The authors conducted a phase II study of somatostatin analogue in 18 patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (four with previous treatment, 14 without previous treatment). Patients received 2,000 mg subcutaneously thrice daily. They were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-2 and acceptable pretreatment biochemical parameters. No patient responded to treatment. The median time to progression was 44 days. The median survival was 106 days. Toxicity related to treatment consisted of mild diarrhea and anorexia. Somatostatin analogue is not active as a single agent in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited stage small cell lung cancer: survival benefit in patients with favourable characteristics

The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains controversial. As part of a randomised study investigating the timing of chest irradiation (CI) with respect to combination chemotherapy, the effect of PCI was evaluated. Between 1981 and 1989, patients were randomised to initial chest irradiation ICI (99 patients) or 18 weeks delayed late chest irradiation LCI (100 patients). PCI was given to 157 patients. In the beginning, only ICI patients received PCI, but in October 1984 the strategy was changed so that all patients received PCI. Thus, the patients who did not receive PCI were randomly allocated. The PCI dose was 33 Gy/11 fractions (45 patients) and 25 Gy/11 fractions (112 patients). The 2-year CNS-recurrence rate (+/- standard error) was significantly lower in patients who received PCI, 16.3 +/- 4.1%, than in those who did not, 55.1 +/- 12.4% (p = 0.01). In contrast, the 2-year cause-specific survival was not significantly different, 24.9 +/- 3.6% and 16.9 +/- 6.2% (p = 0.31). The 2-year progression-free rates with or without PCI were 18.5 +/- 3.3% and 11.4 +/- 5.4%, respectively (p = 0.58). To test the hypothesis that a benefit from PCI would mainly be expected among the patients with the best prognosis, a multivariate regression analysis of prognostic factors was undertaken. Based on weight loss, performance status, serum sodium and age, the third of the patients with the best prognosis were identified. In that group of patients, the survival advantage from PCI was statistically significant, 35.5 +/- 7.2% versus 14.1 +/- 8.0%, P = 0.029. These results are currently being tested in a Danish multicentre trial where patients with a good prognosis are randomised either to receive PCI or not to receive PCI.

Correlation of in vitro drug sensitivity testing results with response to chemotherapy and survival: comparison of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer

Clinical protocols for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were devised to prospectively select individualized chemotherapy based on in vitro drug sensitivity testing (DST) of cell lines derived from the patient's SCLC tumor cell lines or the patient's fresh NSCLC tumor. DST data derived from SCLC tumor cell lines were available for 33/115 (29%) patients. The DST-selected chemotherapy regimen was administered to 21 (18%) patients, or 64% of patients with DST. In SCLC< the DST-selected chemotherapy was administered either during weeks 13-24 following 12 weeks of etoposide/cisplatin, or at relapse after complete response to etoposide/cisplatin. Several parameters of in vitro drug sensitivity were significantly associated (two-sided P < 0.05) with clinical response to primary therapy and also with response to the DST-selected chemotherapy regimen, but were not associated with survival (P = 0.24). Five patients treated with their DST-selected chemotherapy attained a complete or partial response, compared to 5 of 68 who received an empiric regimen (P = 0.057). A total of 36/165 (22%) NSCLC patients had DST successfully completed. These results directed management for 21/96 (22%) patients who eventually received chemotherapy, or 58% of patients with DST. Response to chemotherapy for the patients treated prospectively with their DST-selected chemotherapy regimen (2/21; 9%) was not significantly different than the response rate for patients treated empirically with etoposide/cisplatin (10/69; 14%) in the absence of in vitro results to direct chemotherapy (P = 0.73). There was no difference in survival by treatment group for the NSCLC patients. The correlation between in vitro and clinical response was not significant for any individual drug or for all drugs considered together, illustrating the poor predictive value of in vitro testing with currently available chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Low-dose chemotherapy delays relapse of a dominated and resistant sub-population in a heterogeneous human SCLC xenograft in nude mice

We investigated the influence of cellular heterogeneity on the response to low-dose BCNU chemotherapy of an artificially mixed human small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) xenograft in nude mice containing a BCNU-sensitive and dominating sub-population and a BCNU-resistant and undetectable (dominated) sub-population. The cell lines differed in DNA content, making them distinguishable by DNA flow cytometry (FCM). After 3 weeks of tumor growth, the mice were stratified according to tumor size and randomized to 2 different low-dose treatments with BCNU or no treatment. After a further 3 to 4 weeks, a high-dose treatment (LD10) was given to both groups of treated tumors. Changes in the relative proportions of and cell lines in the tumors were measured by FCM on fine-needle tumor aspirates. At the time of low-dose treatment, all the tumors were totally dominated by the sensitive cells. A temporary response was seen after low-dose treatment. After the high-dose treatment, a similar short response was seen. In the non-treated group, the sensitive cells continued to dominate. At the time of tumor regrowth after the low-dose treatment, most of the tumors continued to be dominated by the sensitive population. At the time of progression after the response to the high-dose treatment, the resistant cell line was the predominant population. If compared with a single high-dose BCNU treatment, the response of tumors treated with a low dose was superior, indicating that the presence of a dominating and slower growing sub-population influenced the outcome of the treatment.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients treated in phase I clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in Phase I clinical trials are considered to have a poor prognosis. Survival from first treatment in a Phase I trial was determined for 349 patients. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to determine whether potential prognostic factors and distinct risk groups could be identified.

METHODS

Patients were identified retrospectively from a large data base of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in Phase I clinical trials at the University of Chicago between February 1987 and October 1991.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 29 months, 10% of patients were alive at the time of analysis. Twenty-nine percent were alive 1 year after the initiation of Phase I chemotherapy, and the median survival from first treatment in a Phase I study was 6.5 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that a better pretreatment performance status, a higher pretreatment serum albumin concentration, a lower pretreatment platelet count, no prior cisplatin chemotherapy, and a genitourinary or gynecologic cancer diagnosis were predictive of better survival. Three risk groups incorporating these five variables were identified, with median survivals of 12.7, 7.4, and 3.5 months for the good, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated in Phase I clinical trials have a median survival of 6.5 months, even though some patients have been treated at early (subtoxic and potentially subtherapeutic) dose levels. The results of this study may allow the identification of patients who are likely to survive long enough to contribute information on acute and cumulative drug-related toxicities and, possibly, tumor response.

Risk of late recurrence and/or second lung cancer after treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

The aim of this study was to illustrate some difficulties in distinguishing late recurrence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), from second primary lung cancer. Three-hundred fourteen SCLC patients were observed at the Institute of Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases in Warsaw, during the period 1976-1985. All patients were treated with chemotherapy and 125 were also treated with radiotherapy on the tumour and mediastinum. Nineteen patients (6%) survived 3 years. This group consisted of eight females (9%) and 11 males (5%). In all of them a complete remission was obtained. In six patients from this group no progression of lung cancer was observed. Four of them are still living, 7.9-16.2 years after the start of treatment. Two patients died of heart infarct. In the remaining 13 patients, progression of SCLC or development of new cancer was noted in the course of observation. In seven of them, histological proof of the character of progression was obtained. In four cases non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was diagnosed after 3-11 years of observation. In one of them SCLC metastases in the liver were unexpectedly found in the autopsy, although adenocarcinoma in the lung diagnosed during bronchoscopy was also confirmed in the autopsy. In three cases SCLC was diagnosed. In one case, 2.7 years from the beginning of treatment, only SCLC metastases were found during laparoscopy. SCLC was found in two other cases after a 7-year cancer-free period. In one of those patients, a new lesion was found in the other lung while the second patient developed a new lesion exactly in the place of the former cancer. In six other patients no histological proof of the character of progression was obtained. Two of the six are still living, 8.2 and 15.1 years later. In the first of these two, a new lesion developed very early in the course of treatment in the same place as the primary tumour and it was regarded as the progression of SCLC. In the second patient, who probably had NSCLC the lesion developed in the contralateral lung after 12.5 years of remission and disappeared after radiotherapy. Four patients died of cancer after 3.2-6.4 years of observation. The cumulative risk of a second primary lung cancer after a 3-year survival period oscillated in our SCLC patients between 4% and 6% for every patient/year of observation. It was concluded that prognosis in SCLC patients is still doubtful, nevertheless, some patients made a complete recovery.

The role of radiation oncology in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer comprises a histologic subgroup of bronchogenic carcinomas distinguished particularly by a responsiveness to cytotoxic agents, and equally by a strong tendency to disseminate, both to mediastinal and distant sites. At one time considered suitable only for short-term palliation by radiation therapy, this disease is now managed by both systemic and regional approaches, typically with close integration of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Thoracic irradiation produces modest improvements in both survival and local control in small cell lung cancer, when the clinical extent is limited to the chest. The optimal parameters of dose, treatment volume, fractionation, and temporal integration with chemotherapy are not yet defined. When the disease is more extensive radiotherapy plays a useful palliative role. New biological insights are being brought to the clinic, and have stimulated new therapeutic initiatives in the treatment of this disease. Modified radiotherapy fractionation schemes and sophisticated integration of chemotherapy and radiation therapy have resulted in further advances. In addition to improved response rates and median survivals, combined modality approaches suggest, in addition, the possibility of cured subset in cases of disease confined to the chest. The adverse effects of thoracic irradiation are manageable and the more serious can be prevented with careful attention to volume and technique. Radiotherapy offers relief of many symptoms and cost-effective palliation of metastatic lesions in most body sites. Considered as a significant problem in oncology, and apart from efforts at primary prevention, major progress in this disease is most likely to result from research focussed on the limited disease subset, which, unfortunately, consists of no more than half the incident cases. These patients have a median survival of 12-18 months, and are sufficiently numerous that it is possible to detect meaningful treatment progress in clinical trials of a reasonable size. Nevertheless, the marked advances of two decades ago, when chemotherapy first came into widespread use, are not seen today. Progress is now more likely to be seen in modest improvements in survival or tumor control rates when control and experimental regimens are compared statistically in large trials or in meta-analyses. While the evidence supports the use of thoracic radiotherapy the ideal drug combination is unknown, and there is a real need for new agents of substantially greater activity than those available today. While more rational combinations of agents may be possible, it seems likely that the limits of tolerance are being reached.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Phase II trial of edatrexate in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival with extensive stage small cell lung cancer is rare. There have been no major advances in the treatment of this stage of disease in the last 15-20 years. New agents with activity against this malignancy are needed. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of edatrexate against small cell lung cancer in a Phase II trial.

METHODS

This was a multicenter cooperative oncology group trial. Patients were either previously untreated or had failed only one prior chemotherapy regimen. All previously untreated patients had extensive stage disease. Patients in whom prior therapy had been unsuccessful had either limited or extensive stage disease. All cases had histologic documentation. Patients received edatrexate (80 mg/m2) intravenously over 20-30 minutes every 7 days. Previously untreated patients with disease progression at any time or stable disease after 6 weeks of treatment were crossed over to treatment with cisplatin and etoposide. The primary end points of the study were clinical response and toxicity to edatrexate. All patients were observed for survival.

RESULTS

Eleven previously untreated and 22 previously treated patients were enrolled. A median of five doses of chemotherapy was given to each group. No major clinical response was observed in either group. The median survival time for the 11 previously untreated patients was 9.8 months versus 3.7 months for individuals who had received prior therapy. Myelosuppression and stomatitis were the primary toxicities, and both were infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Edatrexate is inactive against small cell lung cancer.

Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited disease small cell lung cancer

Between 1983 and 1990, 128 patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC) received consolidative thoracic irradiation after reaching a complete (CR) or partial response (PR) to combination chemotherapy. Patients in CR (n = 85) received 35-36 Gy in 12-14 fractions and patients in PR (n = 43) 24-30 Gy in 3-6 fractions. Until 1989, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was given to patients in CR. There was no significant difference in survival between the CR and PR group. However, patients with residual tumor detected by radiology or bronchoscopy or cyto-/histology had significantly longer survival than those with residual tumor demonstrated by more than one of the above methods of investigation. Overall, local progression was observed in 22% and distant dissemination in 63% of patients. The rate of brain metastases was significantly lower in patients treated with methotrexate and nitrosurea containing schedules and PCI, compared to those who were treated with other schedules (irrespective of PCI).

Pilot study of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-cisplatin-etoposide hybrid chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly sensitive to chemotherapy. Despite the introduction of intensive combination chemotherapy, long-term disease-free survivors are still rare. The emergence of drug-resistant tumor cells during chemotherapy is presumed to be the major cause of poor outcome.

METHODS

A pilot Phase II study of hybrid chemotherapy for patients with SCLC was conducted between October 1986 and March 1988. Dose and schedule for each drug in the regimen were as follows: cyclophosphamide, 700 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), day 1; doxorubicin, 30 mg/m2 IV, day 1; vincristine, 1.4 mg/m2 IV, day 1; cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 IV, day 8; and etoposide, 100 mg/m2 IV, days 8 and 9. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. Patients with limited disease (LD) received chest irradiation of 5000 cGy when a maximal response was achieved. Only patients with LD who achieved a complete response (CR) received prophylactic cranial irradiation of 3000 cGy.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were enrolled and fully evaluated for tumor response and toxicity. All 20 patients with LD responded to the regimen, and 14 (70%) of those achieved a CR. Of 16 patients with extensive disease (ED), 7 CR and 7 partial responses were noted, indicating an overall response rate of 88%. The median survival time was 23.6 months for patients with LD and 12.6 months for those with ED. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, but it was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the hybrid regimen is a highly active one for the treatment of patients with SCLC and warrants additional clinical trials.

A randomised study of bolus vs continuous pump infusion of ifosfamide and doxorubicin with oral etoposide for small cell lung cancer

One hundred and fifty-nine previously untreated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), who were not eligible for intensive chemotherapy, were entered into a randomised study of intravenous (i.v.) doxorubicin and ifosfamide (with mesna) and oral etoposide. The i.v. drugs were given either by bolus therapy or by a continuous infusion (CI) pump over 7 days via a central venous line. Therapy was given for 6 weeks only. On weeks 1, 3 and 5 IV doxorubicin 35 mg m-2 was given with 5 days of oral etoposide 100 mg m-2 daily. On weeks 2, 4 and 6 IV ifosfamide 5 g m-2 was given with equidose mesna. The overall median survival was 25 weeks for patients in the bolus arm and 30 weeks for the CI therapy (P = 0.45). The overall response rate was 64% (18% complete response-CR) and 69% (30% CR) respectively (P = 0.13). The median WHO score for haematological toxicity was 4 for bolus therapy and 3 for CI therapy (P = 0.0007). Despite a trend for less supportive care for patients on CI therapy there were no significant differences in the use of i.v. antibodies and blood or platelet transfusions. There were fewer treatment delays due to myelotoxicity in the CI arm (P = 0.04). The median WHO score for non-haematological toxicity was 2 in both treatment groups. There was significantly less nausea (P = 0.037) but more mucositis (P = 0.01) in the CI arm. Weekly chemotherapy using CI treatment was as effective as bolus therapy. It was well accepted by patients. The assessment of quality of life in a subgroup of patients showed a statistically significant reduction in anxiety and depression for both groups of patients during therapy.

Staging systems of lung cancer

The staging of lung cancer involves assessment of the anatomic extent of disease based on the best available data. Such a definition of neoplastic burden facilitates the systematic analysis and meaningful communication of diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic information. Clinical staging involves the best estimate of extent of disease before performance of surgical resection or biopsy procedures (or both). Surgical-pathologic staging is based on the histopathologic analysis of resected specimens, including determining the extent of local and regional disease. During the past 50 years, two major classification schemes for staging of lung cancer have evolved--one for non-small-cell lung cancers (the TNM system, indicating the status of primary tumor [T], regional lymph node [N], and metastatic [M] involvement) and the other for small-cell carcinoma of the lung (based on limited versus extensive disease). In this report, we review the evolution of the current staging systems used for primary lung cancer and their prognostic implications.

High-dose combined alkylating agent therapy with autologous stem cell support and chest radiotherapy for limited small-cell lung cancer

Although initially responsive to chemotherapy, patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) almost invariably suffer relapse. Recurrent SCLC responds poorly to treatment. Previous trials using high-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow support have commonly used single agents or combined alkylating agents without chest radiotherapy. Among patients with limited disease receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy, locoregional relapse remained the predominant site of first failure. Recent phase II trials using intensive locoregional therapy (aggressive concurrent chemoradiotherapy) have resulted in promising survival. Our trial used combined alkylating agents with autologous marrow support and chest radiotherapy in patients with limited disease in response to conventional-dose induction chemotherapy. Of 19 patients treated, the actuarial survival was 56% with a median follow-up of 18 months following high-dose therapy. Patients who achieved complete or near-complete response prior to high-dose therapy enjoyed the best prognosis. Continued evaluation of intensive systemic and local therapy for SCLC is indicated.

Immunotoxin therapy of small-cell lung cancer. N901-blocked ricin for relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Despite its initial chemosensitivity, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is rarely cured with chemotherapy alone, and fewer than 5% of patients are alive at 5 years. Immunotoxin therapy appears to offer promise in treating the minimal residual disease that remains after induction chemotherapy. We have studied N901-bR in patients with relapsed SCLS. N901-bR consists of the N901 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) and blocked ricin, an altered ricin molecule in which the galactose binding sites of the ricin B-chain which mediate nonspecific binding of the toxin are blocked through the covalent binding of ligands. N901 is an anti-NCAM (CD56) MoAb which binds to SCLC tumors and cell lines, cardiac muscle, natural killer (NK) cells, and peripheral nerve. N901-bR showed a 2.7 log greater in vitro cytotoxicity to the CD56-positive cell line SE-2 than to the antigen-negative Namalwa cell line. Nineteen patients with relapsed antigen-negative Namalwa cell line. Nineteen patients with relapsed and/or refractory SCLC have been entered into a phase I study at doses ranging from 5 to 40 micrograms/kg/day given as a 7-day continuous infusion. The dose-limiting toxicity is capillary leak syndrome observed in two thirds of the patients treated at 40 micrograms/kg/day. One patient at the maximum tolerated dose, 30 micrograms/kg/day x 7 days, has achieved a partial response to N901-bR. No patient has developed clinically significant peripheral or central neuropathy. We plan to begin a phase II study of N901-bR following induction chemotherapy in patients with SCLC.

Phase II study of carboplatin and adriamycin as second line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer

A total of 25 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with carboplatin and Adriamycin (CA) following symptomatic relapse after initial therapy, or because of static or progressive disease during primary treatment. Nine patients had disease within the thorax, and 16 had extensive metastases at relapse. The overall response rate to CA was 64% (20% complete response: CR; 44% partial response: PR). Survival from presentation in 22 of the patients who have died was 6-36 months (median 13 months), and the median survival from the commencement of CA was 23 weeks (range 1 week-11.5 months). The duration of CR was 4-8 months, and of PR 2-7 months. Hospital admission was required following 12% of cycles for management of the complications of treatment. The increasing use of first line regimens of short duration means that reassessment should be made of the activity of further therapy at relapse.

A meta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In spite of 16 randomized trials conducted during the past 15 years, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy on the survival of patients with limited small-cell lung cancer remains controversial. The majority of these trials did not have enough statistical power to detect a difference in survival of 5 to 10 percent at five years. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that thoracic radiotherapy contributes to a moderate increase in overall survival in limited small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We collected individual data on all patients enrolled before December 1988 in randomized trials comparing chemotherapy alone with chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy. Trials that included only patients with extensive disease were excluded.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 13 trials and 2140 patients with limited disease. A total of 433 patients with extensive disease were excluded. Overall, 1862 of 2103 patients who could be evaluated died; the median follow-up period for the surviving patients was 43 months. The relative risk of death in the combined-therapy group as compared with the chemotherapy group was 0.86 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.94; P = 0.001), corresponding to a 14 percent reduction in the mortality rate. The benefit in terms of overall survival at three years (+/- SD) was 5.4 +/- 1.4 percent. Indirect comparison of early with late radiotherapy and of sequential with non-sequential radiotherapy did not reveal any optimal time for treatment. There was a trend toward a larger reduction in mortality among younger patients: the relative risk of death in the combined-therapy as compared with the chemotherapy group ranged from 0.72 for patients less than 55 years old (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.93) to 1.07 (0.70 to 1.64) for patients over 70.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic radiotherapy moderately improves survival in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer who are treated with combination chemotherapy. Identification of the optimal combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy will require further trials.

Chromosome aberrations of human small cell lung cancer induced by a new 111In-bleomycin complex

A new 111Indium labeled bleomycin complex (111In-BLMC) was prepared and found to be effective for tumor imaging and therapy both in mouse glioma and human small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells. Chromosome aberrations were studied in human SCLC cells to explore its mechanisms of killing cancer cells. SCLC cells (N417) were exposed to 111In-BLMC, BLM, or 111InCl3 (for control) for 1 hour, treated with colcemid, and chromosomal changes were analyzed. A dramatic increase in chromatic gaps, breaks, chromosome breaks, double minutes, rings, triradii, quadriradii, and chromosome stickiness were observed in the cells treated by 111In-BLMC compared to BLM or 111InCl3. These results indicated that 111In-BLMC has therapeutic potential for combination chemo-radiotherapy of cancer (e.g., by Auger electrons and local energy deposition).

Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, Etoposide, CIS Platinum (CEVP) in Combination with Radiotherapy: Evaluation of a Protocol Adopted for 6 Years in 148 Cases of Small Cell Lung Cancer

The present study was carried out with the purpose of assessing and evaluating the responsiveness of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to combined treatment (i.e., chemotherapy and radiotherapy). This approach was applied to all patients observed in our Institution during the last 6 years with the exclusion of patients more than 65 years old, with Karnofsky performance status less than 60, and with concomitant non-neoplastic diseases. One hundred and forty-eight patients were selected and treated with a combination chemotherapy regimen including cyclophosphamide, etoposide, epirubicin and cis-platinum. For patients with limited disease, treatment consisted of 3 cycles of chemotherapy (induction), followed by radiation therapy and then by another 3 cycles of chemotherapy (consolidation). For those with extensive disease, treatment consisted only of 6 consecutive cycles of chemotherapy. Results, besides showing the good activity and tolerability of the chemotherapeutic regimen employed (which induced 80 % overall response), indicated that some prognostic factors such as the number of metastatic sites, brain and liver involvement and performance status are essential in determining the outcome of response and, particularly, of survival. In addition, the efficacy and tolerability of the combination chemotherapy-radiotherapy were confirmed, as was the evidence of a synergistic pharmacologic effect between cis-platinum and etoposide.

The cost of treating small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost of treating small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and to assess quality-adjusted survival in these patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Westmead Hospital, a tertiary referral institution.

PATIENTS

Consecutive sample of 31 patients with histologically proved SCLC, treated between January 1987 and December 1987.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The cost of investigation, hospitalisation, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and follow-up of patients overall and for those with limited and extensive disease respectively. Quality-adjusted survival was based on a Q-TWiST analysis.

RESULTS

The median overall cost per patient was $14,413 (range, $1188-$39,598) for all patients and for limited disease and extensive disease was $18,234 (range, $1914-$39,598) and $13,177 (range, $1188-$32,798) respectively. The two major costs were hospitalisation (42%) and chemotherapy (18%). Radiotherapy accounted for 11% of all costs. The Q-TWiST analysis suggests that for patients with limited disease, quality-adjusted survival is similar to absolute survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of SCLC at our institution was expensive but the cost may be reduced by reduction in the duration of hospitalisation, the use of less expensive combination drug regimens, or the use of "true" outpatient chemotherapy. Despite intensive therapy, patients with limited disease maintained a reasonable quality of life.

Prognostic significance of histopathologic subtype and stage in small cell lung cancer

A study of 149 light microscopic tissue slides from 147 patients with recorded initial diagnoses of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (114 cases) and undifferentiated carcinoma (35 cases) was undertaken to test the reproducibility and prognostic impact of a new histopathologic subclassification of SCLC proposed by the Pathology Panel of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). This study was further designed to test the impact of clinical stage, age, sex, and race on survival. The tissue slides were blindly reclassified as SCLC or non-SCLC by a panel of five pathologists with no knowledge of the initial diagnosis. The SCLCs were divided into the three subtypes outlined by the IASLC pathology panel: small (classic or pure), mixed (small cell/large cell), and combined (small cell/squamous carcinoma or small cell/adenocarcinoma). Small cell lung cancer was clinically staged as local, regional, or distant. Consensus diagnosis (defined as agreement by at least three of the five pathologists) was achieved in 144 (96.6%) of the 149 cases. Of these 144 cases, 124 were reclassified as SCLC (115 [92.8%] small, five [4.0%] mixed, and four [3.2%] combined) and 20 were classified as non-SCLC. The median lengths of survival for the small, mixed, and combined subtypes were 225, 1,110, and 203 days, respectively (P = .025). Adequate staging data were available in 123 of the 124 SCLC cases. Of the 123 SCLC cases, 27 (21.9%) were local, 22 (17.9%) were regional, and 74 (60.2%) were distant stage. The median lengths of survival for the local, regional, and distant stages were 428, 251, and 111 days, respectively. This association was highly significant (P = .0001). We conclude that stage is the major determinant of survival in SCLC. Mixed subtypes had significantly longer survival times than the small or combined subtypes (P = .025). Survival times were longer for women than for men, and the survival time difference between men and women was significant (P = .0028). We found no significant differences in survival according to age or race.

Alternating chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. A twelve-week schedule of six drugs

We have treated sixty-two patients (21 with limited disease, 41 with extensive disease), on an outpatient-basis schedule of six drugs administered weekly for twelve weeks. Cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/m2, adriamycin, 20 mg/m2 and vincristine, 2 mg, full dose, were administered during weeks 1, 5 and 9; cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 and etoposide, 100 mg/m2 during weeks 2, 6 and 10; adriamycin and vincristine at the same doses during weeks 3, 7 and 11; methotrexate 30 mg/m2, during weeks 4, 8 and 12. After the first 28 patients vincristine was replaced by teniposide (VM-26) due to neurotoxicity. The overall response rate was 64.5% (complete remission 13 p., partial remission 27 p.). Toxicity grade 3-4, mainly nausea and vomiting or neutropenia, was recorded in 17 patients. Alopecia grade 1-2 was universal. One toxic death occurred from sepsis. The overall survival was 8 months (range 1-40), (95% CL: 53-77%); 8 months in limited disease (range 1-40), and 7 months in extensive disease (range 1-23). Time to treatment failure was 6 months (7 limited disease, 5 extensive disease). In conclusion, the results of this alternating schedule are poorer than those attained with standard, high-dose treatments, mainly in limited disease, but could be a less toxic option for patients with extensive disease.

Extrapulmonary and pulmonary small-cell carcinoma: tumor biology, therapy, and outcome

Extrapulmonary small-cell cancer is a distinct clinicopathological entity from small-cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung. Approximately 1,000 cases have been projected annually in the United States, which represents an overall incidence of between 0.1% and 0.4% of all cancer. Not surprisingly then, little information is available regarding the treatment of this disease, which presents a challenge to the clinician when it is regionally confined. The majority of patients with extrapulmonary small-cell neoplasms have only been treated with local modalities of therapy, surgery, radiation, or a combination of both. Prolonged survival is not infrequent, which is in contrast to the experience for small-cell lung cancer and surprising given our current systemic approach to patients with this disease. This report will summarize the similarities and differences in biology, natural history, and clinical characteristics of patients with extrapulmonary small-cell cancer and small-cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung. The histogenesis of small-cell cancer is briefly reviewed. A general therapeutic approach to patients with small-cell lung cancer is reported. Lastly, recommendations for therapy of patients with regionally confined extrapulmonary small-cell cancer by primary site are outlined.

Natural interferon alfa as maintenance therapy for small cell lung cancer

We performed a 3-armed phase III study between 1982 and 1990 to evaluate low dose natural interferon alfa (nIFN-alpha) as a maintenance therapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following induction chemotherapy (CT) and consolidation radiotherapy (RT). All patients received four cycles of CT (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, etoposide), followed by split-course RT (55 Gy in 20 fractions over 7 weeks). 410 patients entered the study. 237 patients who completed induction CT + RT and were classified as responders (complete response + partial response) were randomly assigned to arm 1: low dose nIFN-alpha (91 patients); arm 2: maintenance CT, six cycles of CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin) (59 patients); or arm 3: control arm (no maintenance treatment) (87 patients). Halfway through the study the CAP arm was discontinued. There was no difference in median survival between the groups (IFN: 11 months, CAP: 11 months, control: 10 months), but a clear difference in long-term survival and in survival in the limited disease group, favouring nIFN-alpha maintenance therapy. Proportional hazards regression analysis also showed a significant effect of IFN treatment on survival. Our results suggest a role for nIFN-alpha in maintaining a clinically disease-free status achieved with other treatment modalities.