The influence of X ray dose levels on normal tissue radioprotection by WR-2721

Cancer Incidence in C3H Mice Protected from Lethal Total-Body Radiation after Amifostine

Amifostine is a potent antioxidant that protects against ionizing radiation effects. In this study, we evaluated the effect of Amifostine administered before total-body irradiation (TBI), at a drug dose that protects against TBI lethality, for potential protection against radiation-induced late effects such as a shortened lifespan and cancer. Three groups of mice were studied: 0 Gy control; 10.8 Gy TBI with Amifostine pretreatment; and 5.4 Gy TBI alone. Animals were monitored for their entire lifespan. The median survival times for mice receiving 0, 5.4 or 10.8 Gy TBI were 706, 460 and 491 days, respectively. Median survival of both irradiated groups was significantly shorter compared to nonirradiated mice ( P < 0.0001). Cancer incidence (hematopoietic and solid tumors) was similar between the irradiated groups and was significantly greater than for the 0 Gy controls. The ratio of hematopoietic-to-solid tumors differed among the groups, with the 5.4 Gy group having a higher incidence of hematopoietic neoplasms compared to the 10.8 Gy/Amifostine group (1.8-fold). Solid tumor incidence was greater in the 10.8 Gy/Amifostine group (1.6-fold). There are few mouse lifespan studies for agents that protect against radiation-induced lethality. Mice treated with 10.8 Gy/Amifostine yielded a lower incidence of hematopoietic neoplasms and higher incidence of solid neoplasms. In conclusion, mice protected from lethal TBI have a shortened lifespan, due in large part to cancer induction after exposure compared to nonexposed controls. Amifostine treatment did protect against radiation-induced hematopoietic tumors, while protection against solid neoplasms was significant but incomplete.

Radioprotective agents for the prevention of side effects induced by radioiodine-131 therapy

Radioiodine 131 (131I) has been used worldwide for the ablation of remnant thyroidal tissue after surgery or as the first-line treatment for Graves’ disease. Although the use of 131I is becoming increasingly prevalent, there is evidence suggesting that this treatment is associated with side effects such as salivary gland dysfunction and an increased risk of leukemia. This article aims to review the potential use of radioprotective agents and the side effects induced by 131I therapy. Several synthetic and natural compounds have been investigated in preclinical and clinical studies. The protective agents reduced the toxicity of 131I, mainly in the salivary glands, and mitigated the genetic damage through different mechanisms. There are limited clinical studies evaluating the use of radioprotective agents in patients undergoing radioiodine therapy. However, lemon candies, lemon juice and sugarless chewing gum have been proposed to be beneficial for minimizing the side effects of radioiodine within the salivary glands.

Amifostine: the first selective-target and broad-spectrum radioprotector

After several decades of preclinical and clinical research, the first approved radioprotective drug, amifostine, is being used in clinical practice. Amifostine has been shown to specifically protect normal tissues from damage caused by radiation and chemotherapy. An inactive prodrug, amifostine is converted to an active thiol by dephosphorylation by alkaline phosphatase in the normal endothelium. The hypovascularity and acidity of the tumor environment and the differential expression of alkaline phosphatase in normal and neoplastic tissues contribute to its cytoprotective selectivity. The cytoprotective mechanism of amifostine is complicated, involving free-radical scavenging, DNA protection and repair acceleration, and induction of cellular hypoxia. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the i.v. use of amifostine to reduce the cumulative renal toxicity associated with repeated administration of cisplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe xerostomia in patients undergoing postoperative radiation treatment for head and neck cancer, where the radiation port includes a substantial portion of the parotid glands. Nonetheless, amifostine has potential applications in many other oncologic settings. Novel schedules and routes of administration are under investigation and may further simplify the use of amifostine, reduce any undesired effects, and considerably broaden its applications. This review summarizes the clinical experience with amifostine and provides insight into future clinical directions.

Amifostine: is there evidence of tumor protection?

A large body of experimental evidence suggests that amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) is a selective cytoprotector of normal tissues. Nevertheless, several experimental studies, most of which were conducted in the early 1980s, suggest that amifostine may protect tumor tissues, although to a much lower degree than its protective effect on normal tissues. Based on a critical literature review, we conclude that any experimental evidence suggesting tumor protection is weak. The effects of anesthesia and hypotension on normal and tumor tissue oxygenation status of animals, the consequences of such events on amifostine activity, and the impact of this complex situation on host immunity and radiotherapy efficacy in the experimental setting do not reliably simulate the clinical setting. Analyses of radiobiologic and histologic results of the Canine Sarcoma Study show that, if any conclusion is to be made, amifostine protected normal tissues and preserved (or even enhanced) the antitumor activity of radiotherapy. The Ormaplatin Study clearly showed a 10-fold decreased concentration of platinum in tumor compared with normal tissues, and does not therefore support evidence of lack of amifostine selectivity. Finally, not one clinical study suggests tumor protection with amifostine. On the contrary, the majority of clinical data strongly suggest that patients who receive amifostine with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy do better than controls. Rather than organizing large-scale, randomized clinical trials to exclude tumor protection by amifostine, it seems more useful to design trials that would measure amifostine benefits in terms of improved quality of life, tumor control, and survival rates in patients being treated with standard or novel chemotherapy/radiotherapy regimens.

Chemical radioprotection: a critical review of amifostine as a cytoprotector in radiotherapy

The use of chemical radioprotectors represents an obvious strategy to improve the therapeutic index in radiotherapy. Amofostine (WR-2721) has recently been approved for use in head and neck cancer to protect against radiation-induced xerostomia. Currently, the question has arisen whether amifostine could be used for radioprotection in broader terms. Amifostine may have the potential to enable intensified treatment by ameliorating mucosal reactions that are often a limiting factor in accelerated fractionation or concomitant chemoradiation. However, it has as yet not been clarified whether sufficient amifostine to reduce mucositis can be administered before each radiation fraction without causing unacceptable toxicity. Also, the optimal dosage and schedule of amifostine in chemoradiation combinations have not yet been established. The major concern related to radioprotectiors is the potential hazard of collateral tumor protection. A number of clinical studies have concluded that amifostine does not reduce antitumor efficacy. However, not even the largest study conducted, with over 300 patients, has sufficient statistical power to detect a clinically significant reduction in tumor control rate. To put this issue ultimately to a rest, a clinical trial with a sufficient accrual to definitely rule out a tumor protective effect of amifostine needs to be conducted. Substances reducing radiation-induced toxicity by modulating the biological response to radiation injury may represent an alternative concept in radioprotection. However, such agents are still at a developmental stage.

Has the outlook improved for amifostine as a clinical radioprotector?

Amifostine has recently been approved for clinical radiotherapy as a protector against irradiation-induced xerostomia. It is our aim to review the outlook for using amifostine as a general clinical radioprotector. Protection against X-rays is mainly obtained by the scavenging of free radicals. The degree of protection is therefore highly dependent on oxygen tension, with protection factors ranging from 1 to 3. Maximal protection is observed at physiological levels of oxygenation. A great variability in protection has also been observed between different normal tissues. Some tissue, like brain, is not protected while salivary glands and bone marrow may exhibit a three-fold increase in radiation tolerance. Amifostine is dephosphorylized to its active metabolite by a process involving alkaline phosphatase. Due to lower levels of alkaline phosphatase in tumor vessels, amifostine is marketed as a selective protector of normal tissue and not tumors. However, the preclinical investigations concerning the selectivity of amifostine are controversial and the clinical studies are sparse and do not have the power to evaluate the influence of amifostine on the therapeutic index.

CONCLUSION

based on the present knowledge amifostine should only be used in experimental protocols and not in routine practice.

Amifostine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential as a radioprotector and cytotoxic chemoprotector

Amifostine (WR-2721) was originally developed as a radioprotective agent. In animals, it protects normal tissues from the damaging effects of irradiation and, as shown in more recent studies, of several cytotoxic agents. Protection of tumours is generally reduced compared with that of normal tissues in animals, suggesting that amifostine may increase the therapeutic window of cytotoxic therapies. Clinical data concerning amifostine suggest that cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced haematological toxicity and cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are decreased upon administration of amifostine prior to cytotoxic drugs. Similarly, amifostine reduces damage to normal tissues caused by radiotherapy. Available data show that this protection is achieved without adversely affecting tumour response or patient survival. In 1 large trial, the reduction in cyclophosphamide- and cisplatin-related toxicities manifested as a decrease in the incidence and severity of neutropenia-related fever and sepsis and in the number of patients with ovarian cancer who discontinue therapy before completion of treatment, thus improving the tolerability of this antineoplastic regimen. In addition, the incidences of cisplatin-induced nephro- and neurotoxicity were reduced. Increased doses of cytotoxic therapy have also been administered when amifostine was given prior to therapy, which may increase tumour response. The predominant adverse effect associated with amifostine are hypotension, nausea and vomiting, somnolence and sneezing. Thus, amifostine is likely to be a useful adjuvant to the treatment of patients with malignancy, particularly those receiving cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin. discontinued therapy before completion of treatment, thus improving the tolerability of this antineoplastic regimen. In addition, the incidences of cisplatin-induced.

Fractionation studies with WR-2721: normal tissues and tumour

We have studied the ability of WR-2721 to protect skin, kidney and an anaplastic murine tumour against single or fractionated X-ray treatments. Skin reactions, four different kidney assays, regrowth delay and local control of tumours have been used to construct dose-response curves from which the degree of radioprotection can be quantified as a protection factor. Low doses of WR-2721 (0.2-0.3 mg X g-1) were used before each of 1, 5 or 10 fractions. The degree of protection was similar in all three systems and it did not change significantly with fractionation.