Irradiation of subclinical disease in the draining lymphatics

Management of the N0 neck--reference or preference

For patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract, appropriate management of the regional lymph nodes is an important and often controversial issue that has significant influence on survival. Over the years radical treatment either by surgery or radiotherapy contributed to improvement in prognosis. Recently, a more conservative approach has achieved a similar level of cancer control with less morbidity. This review considers the issues of selection of patients for treatment of the neck, choice of modality and extent of therapy, treatment of the contralateral neck, management of recurrence and influence of the site and status of the primary lesion.

Are neck nodal volumes drawn on CT slices covered by standard three-field technique?

PURPOSE

Several definitions have been proposed in the past few years on how to contour the various neck nodal levels on CT slices. However, whether the resulting nodal volumes would have been covered by standard techniques is unknown. The purpose of this study was to clarify this issue.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eight patients (N0-N1) with head-and-neck cancer from various primary sites referred to us for definitive radiotherapy were included in this study. Two observers contoured the level Ib-V neck nodal volumes on planning CT according to seven reported definitions. Each observer also drew blocks on digitally reconstructed radiographs for the initial (on-cord) phase of a standard three-field technique (parallel opposed lateral fields and AP supraclavicular field) for three different clinical settings: "medium" larynx (to cover upper, mid, and low jugular nodes), "big" larynx (same as for medium, plus posterior cervical nodes), and "tonsil" (same as for big plus retropharyngeal nodes). Fields blocks were concentrically reduced 5 mm in all directions as a surrogate for the clinical target volume to planning target volume expansion. A plan was created for each of the clinical settings, delivering 2 Gy to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements reference point. The coverage of the nodal levels according to the various definitions was investigated throughout the analysis of the volume receiving 50%, 80%, and 95% of the prescribed dose (V(50), V(80), and V(95), respectively) and dose covering at least 95% of the volume (D(95)) values extracted from their cumulative dose-volume histograms in the three clinical settings.

RESULTS

The V(50) coverage of levels III and IV was adequate for all definitions and trials. For level V, about 3-5% of the volume was outside the 50% isodose of those trials that targeted the posterior cervical chain. Coverage of level Ib was highly dependent on the definition, with up to 21% of the volume outside the standard tonsillar fields. For level II, although the 50% isodose from the tonsillar fields seemed to encompass all definitions, this was not the case for the laryngeal trials. Overall, we found 20-30% of the volumes to be outside the 95% isodose, with larger percentages for levels II and V. Similarly the D(95) results showed all volumes to be underdosed; only about 45% and 65% of levels II and V, on average, received 95% of the prescription dose.

CONCLUSION

Within three different clinical settings, we showed that the current definitions provide nodal neck volumes that often fall outside the 50% and 95% isodose lines of the standard three-field technique. Because these volumes are routinely used to define nodal neck volumes for intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the dose-volume objectives of intensity-modulated radiotherapy may not be consistent with those traditionally achieved by the standard three-field technique.

Bartholin's gland carcinoma, malignant melanoma and other rare tumours of the vulva

Non-squamous cancers of the vulva encompass an exciting and broad group of tumours, including Bartholin's gland carcinoma, malignant melanoma, Paget's disease, sarcomas and lymphoma. These tumours range from innocuous lesions treatable with simple local excision, such as basal-cell carcinoma, to cancers with very poor prognosis, such as Merkel-cell tumours. All of these tumours are thoroughly reviewed, with emphasis on presenting symptoms, pathological diagnosis and optimal management approaches. The literature supporting these recommendations is reviewed. Of the utmost importance in the management of these tumours is a thorough review of the pathological diagnosis by a specialist pathologist and a gynaecological oncologist. Establishing the correct diagnosis is essential to reaching appropriate treatment decisions. Frequently this will necessitate a second opinion by a referral centre.

Elective neck dissection versus observation in stage I squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue and floor of the mouth

A retrospective study was undertaken of patients with T1N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue and floor of the mouth who underwent surgical treatment between 1985 and 1995. Evaluation of two groups of patients (neck dissection versus observation) was made according to the management of the neck. Results were obtained regarding the presence of occult metastases, recurrence in the neck, treatment failure, results of salvage treatment, and disease-free survival. Forty-nine patients underwent surgical treatment: 25 resection of primary and 24 resection plus neck dissection. Overall incidence of regional metastases was 24.5%. Eight patients (16%) developed recurrence of the disease. Seven (14%) had regional recurrences (including 1 with distant metastases) and 1(2%) had local recurrence. Twenty-four percent of patients from the resection of primary group developed neck recurrences in comparison with 4% of the resection plus neck dissection group (P = 0.05). Overall salvage rate was 37.5%. Second primary tumors developed in 16% of patients. Patients who underwent elective neck dissection had a 23% higher disease-free survival rate compared with those who underwent resection of the tumor alone (P = 0.03). The findings of this study stress the importance of control of the neck in early oral cancer. Elective neck dissection significantly improved regional control of the disease.

Long-term impact of postoperative radiotherapy in carcinoma of the vulva FIGO I/II

PURPOSE

Between 1953 and 1978, postoperative radiotherapy was used as an adjuvant therapy for carcinoma of the vulva that had not been treated with radical vulvectomy. We evaluated long-term results and possible prognostic factors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-two patients were treated. Surgical procedures were simple vulvectomy, electrocoagulation, or local excision. Radiotherapy doses to the vulva ranged from 0 to 90 Gy. All patients received radiotherapy to the inguinal lymph nodes, ranging from 30 to 60 Gy. Thirty-year retrospective follow-up was done evaluating the records and statistical survival rates.

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial survival rates in T1 patients were 71% (77% cause-specific survival rate), for T2 patients 43% (48% cause-specific survival rate). The difference between T1 and T2 patients was significant (p < 0.05). Patients with tumors of the labia minora had a significantly higher survival rate than those with different sites affected. Doses of 45 Gy or more to the vulva were sufficient to increase the 5-year cause-specific survival rate from 55% to 88%. The results in three subgroups were analyzed, group 1 having received electrocoagulation, but no radiotherapy of the vulva; group 2, local excision and doses of 40 Gy to the vulva; group 3, local excision and doses of 60 Gy to the vulva. There was a significant effect on 10-year cause-specific survival rates: 48% in group 1, 11% in group 2, and 88% in group 3. In multivariate analysis, the significant independent factors were T classification, tumor sites and-with only marginal significance-radiation doses to the vulva.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis in early vulva carcinoma after nonradical surgery primarily depends on T classification and the site of the primary tumor. With univariate analyses, the dose has a significant effect on survival. In multivariate analyses the dose is a marginal independent factor in the whole group of patients. After nonradical surgery of early vulva carcinoma, the vulva should be irradiated resulting in better long-term survival.

The influence of the radicality of resection and dose of postoperative radiation therapy on local control and survival in carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract

PURPOSE

To evaluate dose concepts in postoperative irradiation of carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract according to the radicality of resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, the charts of 257 patients with histologically-proven carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract (40 T1, 80 T2, 53 T3, 84 T4 tumors, with nodal involvement in 181 cases) were reviewed according to the radicality of resection and dose of irradiation administered. Sixty-four patients had tumor-free resection margins (> 3 mm), 66 patients had close resection margins (< 3 mm), and 101 patients had R1 resections, and 26 patients had R2 resections. A median dose of 56 Gy was applied to the primary tumor bed and the cervical lymphatics (2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week). In cases of R1 or R2 resection, or of close margins (< 3 mm), the tumor bed or, respectively, tumor residuals were boosted with doses up to a median of 66 Gy. Locoregional tumor control and survival was investigated by uni- and multivariate analyses according to T-, N-stage, grade of resection, total dose of radiation, and presence or absence of extracapsular tumor spread and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa.

RESULTS

An overall 3- and 5-year survival rate of 60% and 45%, respectively, was achieved. Rates for freedom from locoregional recurrence were 77% and 72% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. The survival rates according to the grade of resection at 5 years were 67% for patients resected with tumor-free margins, 59% for patients resected with close margins, 26% for patients with R1 resection, and 27% for patients with R2 resection. Within a median follow-up period of 4.7 years for living patients, a total of 67 recurrences (26%) were observed (in 9% of patients resected with tumor-free margins, in 27% with close margins, in 37% of R1 resected, and in 19% of R2 resected patients). Freedom from locoregional recurrence at 3 years was achieved in 100% of the patients resected with tumor-free margins, in 92% of patients resected with close surgical margins, in 87% of R1 and 69% of R2 resected patients. In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the variables grade of resection (p = 0.00031) and total dose of irradiation (p = 0.0046) were found as factors influencing locoregional control. Variables influencing survival according to multivariate analysis are T-stage (p = 0.0057), N-stage (p = 0.024), grade of resection (p = 0.000015), total dose of irradiation (p < 0. 000000). Extracapsular tumor spread and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa are factors of borderline significance (p = 0.055, p = 0.066).

CONCLUSION

In postoperative radiotherapy of head and neck carcinomas, doses adapted to the risk of locoregional recurrent disease should be applied. Patients with R1 and R2 resections should be treated with doses of more than 68 Gy (2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week) (with close margins [< 3 mm] more than 66 Gy) to achieve an improvement in locoregional control and survival.

Elective irradiation of the N0 neck in squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract

The decision of how to optimally manage the clinically negative neck is based on the likelihood of clinically inapparent disease and the efficacy of salvage therapy. The criteria of decision for elective management of the neck takes into account the site, size, depth of infiltration, grading of the primary lesion, clinical and radiologic evaluation, and patient wishes. Diagnostic procedures currently used in evaluating head and neck cancer patients with nodal disease are reviewed. Elective irradiation of the N0 neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is an effective means of maintaining locoregional control. The impact of elective nodal treatment on disease free survival and overall survival is discussed.

Irradiation in carcinoma of the vulva: factors affecting outcome

PURPOSE

This report reviews the increasing role of radiation therapy in the management of patients with histologically confirmed vulvar carcinoma, based on a retrospective analysis of 68 patients with primary disease (2 in situ and 66 invasive) and 18 patients with recurrent tumor treated with irradiation alone or combined with surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of the patients with primary tumors, 14 were treated with wide local excision plus irradiation, 19 received irradiation alone after biopsy, 24 were treated with radical vulvectomy followed by irradiation to the operative fields and inguinal-femoral/pelvic lymph nodes, and 11 received postoperative irradiation after partial or simple vulvectomy. The 18 patients with recurrent tumors were treated with irradiation alone. Indications and techniques of irradiation are discussed in detail.

RESULTS

In patients treated with biopsy/local excision and irradiation, local tumor control was 92% to 100% in Stages T1-3N0, 40% in similar stages with N1-3, and 27% in recurrent tumors. In patients treated with partial/radical vulvectomy and irradiation, primary tumor control was 90% in patients with T1-3 tumors and any nodal stage, 33% in patients with any T stage and N3 lymph nodes, and 66% with recurrent tumors. The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87% for T1N0, 62% for T2-3N0, 30% for T1-3N1 disease, and 11 % for patients with recurrent tumors; there were no long-term survivors with T4 or N2-3 tumors. Four of 18 patients (22%) treated for postvulvectomy recurrent disease remain disease-free after local tumor excision and irradiation. In patients with T1-2 tumors treated with biopsy/wide tumor excision and irradiation with doses under 50 Gy, local tumor control was 75% (3 of 4), in contrast to 100% (13 of 13) with 50.1 to 65 Gy. In patients with T3-4 tumors treated with local wide excision and irradiation, tumor control was 0% with doses below 50 Gy (3 patients) and 63% (7 of 11) with 50.1 to 65 Gy. In patients with T1-2 tumors treated with partial/radical vulvectomy and irradiation, local tumor control was 83% (14 of 17), regardless of dose level, and in T3-4 tumors, it was 62% (5 of 8) with 50 to 60 Gy and 80% (8 of 10) with doses higher than 60 Gy. The differences are not statistically significant. There was no significant dose response for tumor control in the inguinal-femoral lymph nodes; doses of 50 Gy were adequate for elective treatment of nonpalpable lymph nodes, and 60 to 70 Gy controlled tumor growth in 75% to 80% of patients with N2-3 nodes when administered postoperatively after partial or radical lymph node dissection. Significant treatment morbidity included one rectovaginal fistula, one case of proctitis, one rectal stricture, four bone/skin necroses, four vaginal necroses, and one groin abscess.

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiation is playing a greater role in the management of patients with carcinoma of the vulva; combined with wide local tumor excision or used alone in T1-2 tumors, it is an alternative treatment to radical vulvectomy, with significantly less morbidity. Postradical vulvectomy irradiation in locally advanced tumors improves tumor control at the primary site and the regional lymphatics in comparison with reports of surgery alone.

Topographic distribution of inguinal lymph nodes metastasis: significance in determination of treatment margin for elective inguinal lymph nodes irradiation of low pelvic tumors

PURPOSE

To study the distribution of gross inguinal lymph node metastasis and, in particular, its correlation with major pelvic bony structures on a simulation film.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-seven cases of low pelvic tumors having gross inguinal lymph node metastasis that were treated with radiation therapy between November 1987 and December 1992 were segregated for study. The patient's nodes were palpated and marked with lead wire before the simulation film was assumed to be the origin of the previously uninfested node. A total of 84 such labeled nodes was taken. The geometric center of the usually round or elliptical node on the film was obtained from these 37 cases. These centers were transferred to and mapped collectively on a new simulation film showing major pelvic bony structures of left hemipelvis and upper femur.

RESULTS

Distribution of gross inguinal lymph nodes was found confined to the following area, as related to major pelvic bony structure: laterally, just abutting the tangential line that passes through lateral border of the femoral head; medially: 3 cm away from the body's midline axis; superiorly: 1 cm below the line that joins both upper borders of the femoral head; inferiorly: 2.5 cm below the low borders of ischial tuberosity. According to this rectangular boundary, three nodes were out of the field, nine nodes near the border less than 1 cm margin. This area adequately covered 86% (72 of 84) of the studied nodes.

CONCLUSION

Distribution study is important in determining the treatment margin. In general, an additional 1-2 cm beyond the area described above is the recommended treatment margin for elective inguinal lymph nodes irradiation with high confidence level of coverage.

Radical vulvectomy with postoperative irradiation for vulvar cancer: therapeutic implications of a central block

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To report the long-term results of vulvectomy, node dissection, and postoperative nodal irradiation using a midline vulvar block in patients with node positive vulvar cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1971 through 1992, 27 patients with carcinoma of the vulva and histologically involved inguinal lymph nodes were treated postoperatively with radiation therapy after radical vulvectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy (n = 25), radical vulvectomy and unilateral lymphadenectomy (n = 1), or hemivulvectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy (n = 1). Federation Internationale de Gynecologic et d'Obstetrique stages were III (n = 14), IVA (n = 8), and IVB (n = 5) squamous cell carcinoma. Inguinal lymph nodes were involved with tumor in all patients (average number positive = 4, range 1-15). Postoperative irradiation was directed at the bilateral groin and pelvic nodes (n = 19), unilateral groin and pelvic nodes (n = 6), or unilateral groin only (n = 1). These 26 patients had the midline blocked. In addition, one patient received irradiation to the entire pelvis and perineum. Doses ranged from 10.8 to 50.7 Gy (median 45.5) with all patients except 1 receiving > or = 42.0 Gy.

RESULTS

Actuarial 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival estimates were 40% and 35%, respectively. Recurrences developed in 63% (17/27) of the patients at a median of 9 months from surgery (range 3 months to 6 years) and 15 of these have died; two patients with recurrences are surviving at 24 and 96 months after further surgery and radiation therapy. Central recurrences (under the midline block) were present in 13 of these 17 patients (76%), either as central only (n = 8), central and regional (n = 4), or central and distant (n = 1). Additionally, three patients developed regional recurrences and one patient developed a concurrent regional and distant relapse. One patient developed a squamous cell cancer of the anus under the midline block 54 months after the initial vulvar cancer and an additional patient developed transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter (outside the radiation field) 12 months after diagnosis. Factors associated with a decreased relapse-free survival included increasing Federation Internationale de Gynecologic et d'Obstetrique stage (p = 0.01) and invasion of the tumor into the subcutaneous (SC) fat or deep soft tissue (p = 0.05). Chronic lower extremity edema developed in four patients, but there have been no other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical vulvectomy has often been considered sufficient central treatment for vulvar carcinoma, with postoperative irradiation directed only to the nodes. Although designed to protect the radiosensitive vulva, use of a midline block in this series resulted in a 48% (13/27) central recurrence rate, much higher than the 8.5% rate previously reported with this technique. Routine use of the midline block should be abandoned and, instead, postoperative irradiation volumes should be tailored to the individual patient.

Radiation therapy in management of carcinoma of the vulva with emphasis on conservation therapy

BACKGROUND

This report consists of a retrospective analysis of 50 patients with primary invasive and 17 with recurrent histologically confirmed vulvar carcinoma treated with radiation therapy for locoregional disease.

METHODS

Of the patients with primary tumors, 13 were treated with wide local excision plus radiation therapy; 13 had radical vulvectomy followed by irradiation to the operative fields and inguinal-femoral/pelvic lymph nodes; 8 received similar postoperative radiation therapy after partial or simple vulvectomy; 16 patients had radiation therapy alone after biopsy; and 17 had recurrent tumors treated with radiation therapy alone.

RESULTS

In patients treated with biopsy/local excision, local tumor control was 92-100% in T1-3N0 disease, 40% in similar stages with N1-3, and 27% in recurrent tumors. Among patients treated with partial/radical vulvectomy and radiation therapy, primary tumor control was 90% in those with T1-3 tumors and any nodal stage, 33% in those with any T stage and N3 lymph nodes, and 66% in patients with recurrent tumors. The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87% for patients with T1N0 disease, 62% for those with T2-3N0 disease, 30% for those with T1-3N1 disease, and 11% for patients with recurrent tumors; there were no long-term survivors with T4 or N2-3 disease. Four of 17 patients treated for postvulvectomy recurrent disease remain disease-free after local tumor excision and radiation therapy. In patients with T1-2 tumors treated with biopsy/wide tumor excision and radiation therapy with doses less than 50 Gy, the local tumor control was 75% (three of four patients), in contrast to 100% (13 of 13 patients) with 50.01-65 Gy. With T3-4 tumors treated with local excision and radiation therapy, tumor control occurred in none of three patients with doses less than 50 Gy and 66% (six of nine) with 50.01-65 Gy. In patients with T1-2 tumors treated with partial/radical vulvectomy and radiation therapy, local tumor control was 75% (six of eight), regardless of dose level; in T3-4 tumors, it was 67% (four of six patients) with 50-60 Gy and 86% (six of seven) with 65-70 Gy. Differences were not statistically significant. There was no significant dose response for tumor control in the inguinal-femoral lymph nodes, with doses of 50 Gy being adequate for elective treatment of nonpalpable lymph nodes and 60-70 Gy controlling tumor growth in 75-80% of patients with N2-3 nodes when administered postoperatively, after partial or radical lymph node dissection. Significant treatment morbidity included one rectovaginal fistula, one case of proctitis, one rectal stricture, four bone/skin necroses, four vaginal necroses, and one groin abscess.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide local tumor excision and radiation therapy or irradiation alone in T1-2 tumors is an alternative treatment to radical vulvectomy in controlling vulvar carcinoma, with significantly less morbidity. In comparison with reported rates for surgery alone, radiation therapy after radical vulvectomy for locally advanced tumors improves tumor control at the primary site and regional lymphatics. Indications and techniques of radiation therapy are discussed.

Resection of advanced cervical metastasis prior to definitive radiotherapy for primary squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract

Thirty-five previously untreated patients with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract with advanced neck disease (mass greater than 3 cm) but with primary lesions thought to be locally controllable with radiotherapy were selected between 1972 and 1988 for treatment by neck dissection followed by radiotherapy; postoperative to the neck and definitive to the primary. Limited neck dissections spared muscles, nerves, and vasculature structures unless clinically involved with cancer. All patients received at least 50 Gy, postoperatively, to the entire neck with doses of up to 75 Gy being delivered to the primary treatment portals. Regional (neck) failure occurred in 11% (4 of 35) patients. Overall, 5-year survival from cancer was 55%. Multiple levels of neck involvement were associated with poorer survival than a single large node; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Delay in the institution of radiotherapy following surgery adversely affected survival (p = 0.01). This study demonstrates that in selected patients it is possible to resect advanced nodal metastasis prior to treating the primary with radiotherapy without compromising cancer control.

Postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an analysis of treatment results and complications

One hundred thirty-four patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with radical surgery and postoperative radiation therapy between October 1964 and October 1984. All patients had greater than or equal to 2 years and 84% had greater than or equal to 5 years of follow-up. All patients included in the study were scheduled to receive continuous-course irradiation following a major cancer operation for previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx and began radiation treatment less than or equal to 3 months after the surgical procedure. Ninety-six percent had AJCC pathologic Stage III or IV cancer, and all were without evidence of gross disease at the start of irradiation. The majority of recurrences above the clavicles occurred in the primary field (84%) as opposed to the posterior strip (8%) or low neck (8%). Based on multivariate analysis and tabular comparisons, 4 factors were found to be significantly important for predicting disease control above the clavicles: (a) Surgical margin (5-year actuarial control with invasive cancer at the margin, 53%, versus 81% with negative margins, p = .009). Patients with close margins or in situ cancer at the margins had the same rate of control as those with negative margins. (b) Primary site (oral cavity, 64%, versus other sites, 83%; p = .029). (c) Neck Stage (N0-1 versus N2-3). (d) Number of indications for irradiation--for example, bone invasion, multiple positive nodes, perineural invasion (1-3 indications, 85%, versus greater than or equal to 4, 62%; p = .06). The rate of disease control above the clavicles did not correlate well with AJCC pathologic stage: Stage I-II, 67%; Stage III, 81%; Stage IVA (T1-3, N2-3A), 68%; Stage IVB (T4 and/or N3B), 80%. The interval between surgery and the start of irradiation (range 1-10 weeks) also was not prognostically important, even with stratification by tumor dose, surgical margin, and number of indications for irradiation. At 5 years, the actuarial survival rate was 33% for the entire group; for patients with invasive cancer at the margin, the survival rate was approximately half that of those whose margins were free of invasive cancer (17% versus 37%). Based on multivariate analysis, 2 factors were found to significantly increase the probability of death due to cancer: (a) neck Stage (N0-1 versus N2-3); (b) extension of tumor from the primary site into the skin or soft tissues of the neck.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The prognostic significance of lymph node involvement in pyriform sinus and supraglottic cancers

Three hundred and thirty-three patients with carcinoma of the pyriform sinus or supraglottis were reviewed with regard to lymph node involvement and prognosis. All patients were treated with curative intent and had a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Every patient was restaged according to the AJCC, 1983 recommendations. In addition, nodal fixation to cervical fascia or muscle was evaluated with regard to prognosis. Seventy-five percent (89/119) of the pyriform sinus cancer and 47% (101/214) of the supraglottic cancer patients presented with clinically palpable cervical nodes. The distribution of patients according to N stage was 143 (43%), 84 (25%), 58 (17%), 48 (14%) for N0, N1, N2, N3 respectively. In patients where information on nodal fixation was available, 29% had fixed nodes. No difference in prognosis was noted between N0 and N1 or N2 and N3 stages, and these groups were therefore combined. The 3-year survival was 85% for T1 (N0/N1), 77% for T2 (N0/N1), 63% for T3 (N0/N1), and 65% for T4 (N0/N1) cases compared to 19% for T1 (N2/N3), 34% for T2 (N2/N3), 33% for T3 (N2/N3), and 32% for T4 (N2/N3) cases demonstrating that N stage predominates over T stage with respect to survival. Both the local recurrences and distant metastases increased as N stage advanced. A noteworthy difference between patients with fixed nodes and mobile nodes was found with regard to neck recurrence (35% versus 17%), distant metastases (33% versus 19%) and survival (27% versus 58%). In conclusion, nodal stage is a highly significant determinant of survival independent of T stage in cancers of the pyriform sinus and supraglottis. N0, N1 status and mobility were predictive of a favorable prognosis as opposed to N2, N3 status and fixation. These findings were consistent when the pyriform sinus cancers and supraglottic cancers were analyzed separately.

Implications of the density of clonogenic infestation in radiotherapy

Treatment schemes must be evaluated in a clinical context. It was observed by Coutard in the 1920s that exophytic tumors disappear by the third to fourth week of treatment and are more often controlled, stage for stage, than ulcerative and/or infiltrative tumors. It has also been demonstrated that the control rate is higher in patients whose tumor has clinically disappeared at the end of treatment than in those with clinically residual tumor. A possible explanation is that, after the clinical disappearance tumor cells that remain are euoxic during the latter part of treatment. Since some parameters, such as reoxygenation and proliferation, may work in opposite directions, a balance has to be found for each tumor mass. Furthermore, there are clinical facts that, although without explanation, must be considered.

Regional outcome in oropharyngeal and pharyngolaryngeal cancer treated with high dose per fraction radiotherapy. Analysis of neck disease response in 1646 cases

Out of a series of 1666 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx and pharyngolarynx, 1646 were evaluable at a 3-year interval following radical radiation therapy. The actuarial 3-year nodal control rate using the AJC classification was: N0 98%, N1 90%, N2 88%, N3 71% when the primary was controlled. The regional outcome is influenced by clinical features such as nodal size, multiplicity and fixity. Cervical recurrence frequency is higher for pharyngolaryngeal carcinoma than for oropharyngeal cancer. The impact of the treatment planning on regional control is discussed. Due to the of concomitant boosting of nodes, cervical metastases were treated according to a type of accelerated fractionation schedule with weekly doses of 12-15 Gy for a total of 70-85 Gy in 75% of the cases. Clear-cut dose control relationships are demonstrated for nodes larger than 3 cm in diameter. Overboosting residual cervical disease fails to yield a better nodal control. Comparative analysis is established between results obtained with this high dose per fraction radiotherapy schedule, conventional regimens of irradiation and other new approaches, combining chemical and physical agents. Therapeutic implications are also derived to define adequate field coverage.

The influence of excisional or incisional biopsy of metastatic neck nodes on the management of head and neck cancer

Between November 1964 and December 1981, 80 patients who had undergone an open biopsy of a cervical lymph node containing squamous cell carcinoma were treated with curative intent in the University of Florida Division of Radiation Therapy. Irradiation was the initial step in the definitive treatment of all patients, followed by neck dissection and/or primary resection, as indicated. The patients were divided into two groups. (a) NX (no gross residual neck disease) (25 patients): According to the referring surgeons' and pathologists' reports, a single, clinically positive lymph node was totally excised in 25 patients. No other clinically positive lymph nodes were appreciated upon referral. No neck dissections were added following irradiation in this group of patients. The absolute 5 year disease-free survival in the NX group was 79%, and the rate of neck disease control was 96%. (b) Gross residual neck disease (55 patients): Gross residual disease remained in the neck in 55 patients following biopsy. In some patients, only an incisional biopsy of a large mass had been performed; in others, only one of several involved nodes was removed. The absolute 5 year disease-free survival in this group of patients was 31%, and the rate of neck disease control was 64%. The more consistent addition of a neck dissection in recent years has resulted in improved neck control rates in this group: 13/20 (65%) for N1-N2 disease and 2/7 (29%) for N3A disease following irradiation alone versus 6/7 (86%) for N2 disease and 5/8 (63%) for N3A disease when a neck dissection was added following irradiation. There are some differences in the rates of neck control, control above the clavicles, survival, distant metastasis, and complications between this series and other reported series in which open neck-node biopsy preceded definitive treatment. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.