Pelvic lymphadenectomy combined with transperineal interstitial implantation of iridium-192 and external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostatic carcinoma: technical description

Factors associated with the survival of prostate cancer patients with rectal involvement

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer patients with rectal involvement are rare, and the factors associated with the survival of these patients are yet to be elucidated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected data on patients who were admitted to our hospital for prostate cancer in the last thirteen years and of those in studies in the literature. The associations of clinical characteristics with survival were evaluated using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

This study included 94 patients (5 admitted to our hospital and 89 from studies in the literature) of prostate cancer with rectal involvement. 11 patients in the group of synchronous rectal involvement at first cancer diagnosis (n = 58) and 23 patients in the group of metachronous diagnosis of rectal involvement (n = 29) died at the latest follow up. The estimated overall survival rate (% ± SE) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 68.3 ± 5.3%, 54.4 ± 7.2%, and 38.1 ± 11.1%, respectively. In the Cox univariate analysis, Asian prostate cancer (p = 0.001) was associated with better survival, while rectal bleeding (p = 0.043), metachronous presentation of development of rectal involvement (p = 0.000), prior hormonal therapy (p = 0.000) and extrarectal metastases (p = 0.054) were associated with poor survival. In multivariate analysis, prior hormone therapy (HR = 14.540, p = 0.000) and rectal bleeding (HR = 2.195, p = 0.041) retained independent poor prognostic values. There were 13 patients survived for more than 3 years, the longest survival time was 96 months. Total pelvic extenteration (TPE) combined with hormonal therapy in 12 hormone-untreated prostate cancer give us six of thirteen long-term survivors for more than 3 years in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that rectal involvement does not necessarily predict a worse outcome when presenting as a previously hormone-untreated disease and that the prognosis was worse when presenting as a hormone relapsed disease. Prior hormone therapy and rectal bleeding were associated independently with a significantly poor overall survival in prostate cancer patients with rectal involvement. TPE combined with hormonal therapy appears to confer better overall survival in hormonally untreated patients.

VIRTUAL SLIDES

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1604504118106105.

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE

We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.

Does brachytherapy have a role in the treatment of prostate cancer?

The goal of radiation therapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumor while preserving normal surrounding tissue. For early-stage prostate cancer, the ultimate conformal irradiation is to place radioactive sources directly into the gland either as permanent or temporary seeds. Permanent seed implantation is capable of delivering two times the radiobiologically equivalent dose of external beam irradiation to the prostate and tumor. In the past, the results of prostate brachytherapy were likely poor owing to the technical difficulty in accurately placing the radioactive seeds uniformly throughout the prostate. The use of low-dose-rate I-125 to treat high-grade cancers probably also contributed to the poorer results as compared with external beam irradiation. Over the last 10 years, however, technologic advances in transrectal ultrasonography, computer dosimetry, and template-based transperineal techniques have dramatically improved the accuracy and consistency of the brachytherapist to place radioactive sources directly into the prostate gland. Transperineal ultrasound or CT directed seed implantation has replaced the older retropubic method. Brachytherapists are now able to accurately map out the gland prior to the implant and carefully evaluate preoperatively seed placement. The availability of such radioactive sources as iodine-125, palladium-103, and iridium-192 has also given the brachytherapist isotopes that can be more carefully matched to the biology and stage of the tumor. More sensitive definitions of failure have prompted radiation oncologists and urologists to carefully evaluate the efficacy of external beam irradiation and surgery. Accurate comparison of the efficacy of brachytherapy to surgery and to external beam radiation requires a randomized study. Comparisons of retrospective studies are fraught with the problems of the heterogeneous nature of early-stage prostate cancer. Imbalances in stage, grade, initial PSA extraprostatic disease, and nodal status of patient groups make comparisons difficult. Most of the long-term data for permanent seed implantation are the result of work at a single institution. These results will need to be repeated at other institutions treating patients in a similar manner. Because techniques vary from institution to institution, permanent implant results will need to be carefully evaluated for technique as well as stratified for pretreatment variables. Pretreatment PSA and grade appear to be more sensitive variables than stage in predicting failure after radiation. As more patients are diagnosed with very early and nonpalpable disease, future studies will need to stratify patients based on these pretreatment factors. Patients with early-stage disease but identified as high risk for extraprostatic disease will require more intensive regimens. The treatment outcomes based on biopsy results are inconclusive. A lack of consensus on the definition of a truly positive biopsy remains forthcoming. The value of a positive prostate biopsy as an outcome predictor for clinical failure is still unclear. The use of prostate nuclear cell antigen staining may help clarify the issue. Comparison of treatment outcome based on absolute PSA is also difficult. The Seattle series suggest that brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation is as efficacious as external beam irradiation for early-stage disease in patients with a low PSA (< 10 ng/mL). As the PSA value rises above 10 ng/mL, the probability of failure after external beam rises substantially. Results from the Seattle series suggest an advantage to seed implant alone or the judicious application of seed implant boost to external beam radiation for these patients with more advanced cancer. The most sensitive measurement of therapeutic outcome is progression-free survival. Few studies to date have evaluated progression-free survival.

Intraoperative optimization of needle placement and dwell times for conformal prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Traditionally, transperineal prostate brachytherapy has been heavily operator dependent. To overcome this limitation, a treatment planning method was developed for intraoperative planning, guidance, and evaluation. In this setting, reliability, speed, and ease of understanding are primary considerations. This planning method has been implemented for ultrasound guided implants of the prostate, but can be extended for use in other body sites.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The length and cross-section of the target (prostate) and location of urethra and rectum are determined intraoperatively from live ultrasound imaging. The planning program then automatically generates a "reference plan" containing needle locations, dwell times, and the resulting isodose distribution. As needles are placed, this information is corrected to account for any deviation of needle placement or movement of the prostate. Once all needles are in place, the normalization is adjusted to reconcile remaining hot-spots with coverage of the target volume. Optimization is performed in three separate stages. Each stage works to enhance only a subset of the implant parameters. (a) Pattern Optimization attempts to find the most appropriate placement for the needles or catheters. It is based on the transverse contour of the target volume. Needles are placed uniformly around the perimeter, and interior needle positions are determined from the cross-sectional area and shape. Critical structures such as the urethra are explicitly avoided. This step provides the overall framework for the implant, and is not generally repeated. (b) Relative Dwell Time Optimization selects relative dwell times that will give the best uniformity of dose. It works by setting the relative dwell time in each source position inversely proportional to the dose delivered to that point by the other source positions. It is used in the reference plan, and is repeated as each needle is inserted. This provides dosimetric feedback to the physician, who can judge the effect of deviations from the reference plan. (c) Relative Volume Optimization is an interactive method for fine tuning the normalization based upon volume analysis. The volume analysis is presented in tabular and graphical form, both being updated rapidly as the normalization is adjusted. The information is formatted to help the operator judge coverage and uniformity. Special functions are provided that allow the operator to "jump" to special normalization values based on several indices of uniformity or uniformity/coverage.

RESULTS

This system overcomes some conventional brachytherapy limitations. Rather than depend on the operator's intuitive judgement of where the needles should be placed, a global plan is generated and validated with full dose calculations. Immediate feedback is provided concerning the adequacy of placement and avoidance of critical structures. This information is provided in terms of actual tissue doses to the target volume and critical structures using point doses, isodose distributions, and volume analysis. Since the new method was introduced in January 1994, 33 implants have been performed. The needle placement method has been reliable in the clinic, with different doctors producing similar results on subsequent fractions for the same patient.

CONCLUSION

The method of decomposing the optimization problem into several simple steps is capable of rapidly, consistently, and reliably designing conformal treatment plans of high uniformity. Operator dependence has been significantly reduced. We are adapting the method for other anatomic sites.

Improved local control and survival for surgically staged patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with up-front low dose rate iridium-192 prostate implantation and external beam irradiation

PURPOSE

In an effort to improve upon the historically poor local control and survival rates for locally advanced prostate carcinoma, a prospective multidisciplinary clinical trial was initiated using low dose rate Iridium-192 prostate implantation and external beam irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1983 and September 1989, 57 patients with newly diagnosed bulky prostatic carcinoma (5 Stage B2, 52 Stage C) were treated at the Mayo Clinic (34 patients) and William Beaumont Hospital (23 patients) with (a) 5 Gy delivered preoperatively in one fraction, (b) pelvic lymphadenectomy with interstitial implantation of the prostate using Iridium-192 seeds via a perineal template to 30-35 Gy, and (c) 30.6 Gy external irradiation to prostate only in 17 fractions.

RESULTS

After lymphadenectomy, 30/57 (53%) patients had pathologically confirmed positive lymph nodes or "D1" disease. Thirty-four patients (60%) had Gleason scores > or = 7. Mean age at diagnosis was 63.3 years. Median overall follow-up was 72 months. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 85% and disease-free survival was 63%. The 5-year survival for patients with negative nodes was 93% and with positive nodes was 79%. The corresponding survival for patients with Gleason scores < or = 6 was 96% and > or = 7 was 78%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that of all covariates considered, only Gleason score had prognostic significance for disease-free survival (p < 0.05) and no covariates were statistically significant for overall survival. Thirty-nine of the 57 patients had a prostatic re-biopsy performed at 18 months. Pathologically confirmed local control was ultimately achieved in 31/39 (79.5%). There was no difference in survival in patients with positive re-biopsies vs. those with negative results. The 5-year actuarial rate of clinical local control was 94%. Three patients clinically failed locally and 21 demonstrated distant progression. The median time to progression was 34 months. Nineteen percent received some form of hormonal manipulation at the time of their treatment course and an additional 42% were treated with hormones during their follow-up period, primarily after distant failure. The grade 4 rectal ulceration rate decreased to 4.5% with modification of the brachytherapy technique. Three patients experienced grade 4 urinary incontinence and three patients experienced grades 3 or 4 chronic perineal pain.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that bulky prostate carcinoma can be successfully controlled locally by this novel and aggressive approach with moderate toxicity and improved survival.

Pelvic lymphadenectomy and transperineal interstitial implantation of IR 192 combined with external beam radiotherapy for bulky stage C prostatic carcinoma

From January 1983 until June 1987, 51 patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma (47 Stage C, 4 bulky B2) were treated at Mayo Clinic (33 patients) and at William Beaumont Hospital (18 patients) with (a) 5 Gy delivered pre-operatively in one fraction, (b) pelvic lymphadenectomy and (c) interstitial implantation of the prostate with Ir 192 seeds via a perineal template (the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template) to deliver 35 Gy, and (d) 30.6 Gy external beam therapy in 17 fractions to prostate only fields. Initial clinical response has been excellent. Local control, with a median follow-up of 45 months, has been 100% by clinical exam and 84.5% pathologically in the subset biopsied. Disease-free actuarial survival at 5 years is 89%. Major toxicity has been limited to the rectum, but a modification of the brachytherapy technique has reduced this sharply. We conclude that bulky Stage C prostatic carcinoma can be successfully treated by this aggressive combination of modalities with acceptable toxicity.

Combination of external beam irradiation and multiple-site perineal applicator (MUPIT) for treatment of locally advanced or recurrent prostatic, anorectal, and gynecologic malignancies

We have devised a single after-loading applicator, the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT), which has been used in combination with external beam irradiation to treat 104 patients with either locally advanced or recurrent malignancies of the cervix, vagina, female urethra, prostate, or anorectal region. Twenty-six patients treated for prostate cancer are excluded because of their short follow-up. Local failure developed in 13 of the 78 remaining patients (16.6%)--major complications developed in 4 patients (5.1%). Follow-up has been 1 year to 7 1/2 years; 60/78 patients have been followed for more than 2 years. All local recurrences and complications occurred before 18 months. The device consists of two acrylic cylinders, an acrylic template with an array of holes that serve as guides for trocars, and a cover plate. In use, the cylinders are placed in the vagina and/or rectum or both and then fastened to the template so that a fixed geometric relationship among the tumor volume, normal structures, and source placement is preserved throughout the course of the implantation. Appropriate computer programs have been developed to calculate the dose from these implants. The advantages of the system are (a) greater control of the placement of sources relative to the tumor volume and critical structures, as a result of the fixed geometry provided by the template and cylinders, and (b) improved dose-rate distributions obtained by means of computerized optimization of the source placement and strength during the planning phase. We conclude that the local control rate (83.4%) with low morbidity (5.1%) achieved with the combination of external beam irradiation and MUPIT applicator in these patients with locally advanced malignancies represents an improvement over previous published results with other applicators.