Premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy have a low risk of local failure

Curcumin Inhibits the Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer by Blocking Tafazzin/Yes-Associated Protein Axis

Purpose

This study was aimed to explore the anti-tumor effect of curcumin on breast cancer (BC) and the underlying mechanism involving Tafazzin (TAZ)/Yes-associated protein (YAP) axis.

Methods

Different concentrations of curcumin (0, 10, 20 and 30 μM) were used to treat BC cells (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells). The viability, colony formation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion of BC cells were detected by MTT, colony formation, flow cytometry, wound-healing and transwell assay, respectively. The protein expression of TAZ and YAP (effectors of Hippo signaling pathway) was detected by Western blot. MDA-MB-231 cells were injected into mice to verify the anti-tumor effect of curcumin in vivo.

Results

Curcumin (20 and 30 μM) inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted the apoptosis of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Curcumin decreased the protein expression of TAZ and YAP in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Overexpression of YAP reversed the anti-tumor effect of curcumin on MDA-MB-231 cells. In addition, curcumin (100, 200 and 300 mg/kg/d) inhibited the growth of tumor xenografts in mice, and down-regulated the protein expression of TAZ and YAP in tumor xenografts. However, curcumin at a concentration of 300 mg/kg/d slowed the increasing of body weight in mice.

Conclusion

Curcumin inhibited the tumorigenesis of BC by blocking TAZ/YAP axis.

Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Currently, the local treatment of most patients with early invasive breast cancer consists of breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We have previously reported on the risk factors for ipsilateral breast relapse (IBR) in 1,026 patients treated with BCT after a median follow-up of 5.5 years. In the present study, we evaluated the IBR incidence and the risk factors for IBR after prolonged follow-up.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We updated the disease outcome for all 1,026 patients using the clinical information collected from the medical registration of The Netherlands Cancer Institute and performed step-wise proportional hazard Cox regression analysis to identify the risk factors associated with an increased risk of IBR after BCT at long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 114 patients had developed an IBR as the first event. The IBR rate was 9.3% and 13.8%, respectively, at 10 and 15 years. Also, the increase in IBR was continuous without reaching a plateau, even after 15 years. Univariate analysis showed that involved surgical resection margins, young age, vascular invasion, and the presence and quantity of an in situ component are risk factors for IBR. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor-positive surgical resection margins (hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-5.2, p = 0.0002) or the presence of vascular invasion (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.2, p = 0.004) is the major independent risk factor for IBR.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from long-term follow-up showed a constant increase in IBR among patients treated by BCT, even after 15 years, without reaching a plateau. Involved surgical resection margins and vascular invasion were the most important risk factors for IBR.

The safety of breast-conserving therapy in patients with breast cancer aged ≤40 years

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to study the probability of local control after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in a large population of patients with early-stage breast cancer aged < or = 40 years and to determine which factors had prognostic value.

METHODS

All patients (n = 758) aged < or = 40 years with clinical stage I or II breast cancer who underwent BCT in general hospitals in the southern part of the Netherlands between 1988 and 2002 were selected for the current analysis. BCT included local excision of the tumor followed by irradiation of the breast. Of 758 patients, 329 patients (43%) received adjuvant systemic treatment, and 36 patients (5%) underwent a microscopically incomplete excision. The median follow-up was 8.5 years.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 95 patients developed a local recurrence without evidence of distant disease at the time the recurrence was diagnosed. Contralateral breast cancer was diagnosed in 59 patients. The 5- and 10-year actuarial local recurrence rates were 9.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.6-11.4%) and 17.9% (95% CI, 14.1-21.7%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, adjuvant systemic treatment reduced the risk of local recurrence (hazards ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.78) and contralateral breast cancer (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.87) by >50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of local recurrence in young patients who underwent BCT was reduced strongly by using adjuvant systemic treatment. This finding may provide an argument if favor of advising the use of systemic treatment for all patients aged < or = 40 years who undergo BCT.

A phase III randomized study on the sequencing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the conservative management of early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare two different timings of radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer who underwent conservative surgery and were candidates to receive adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 206 patients who had quadrantectomy and axillary dissection for breast cancer and were planned to receive adjuvant CMF chemotherapy were randomized to concurrent or sequential radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered only to the whole breast through tangential fields to a dose of 50 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks, followed by an electron boost of 10-15 Gy in 4-6 fractions to the tumor bed.

RESULTS

No differences in 5-year breast recurrence-free, metastasis-free, disease-free, and overall survival were observed in the two treatment groups. All patients completed the planned radiotherapy. No evidence of an increased risk of toxicity was observed between the two arms. No difference in radiotherapy and in the chemotherapy dose intensity was observed in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with negative surgical margins receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy can be delayed to up to 7 months. Concurrent administration of CMF chemotherapy and radiotherapy is safe and might be reserved for patients at high risk of local recurrence, such as those with positive surgical margins or larger tumor diameters.

The evolution of accelerated, partial breast irradiation as a potential treatment option for women with newly diagnosed breast cancer considering breast conservation

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is a safe, effective alternative to mastectomy for many women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. This approach involves local excision of the malignancy with tumor-free margins, followed by 5-7 weeks of external beam whole breast (WB) radiotherapy (XRT) to minimize the risk of an in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Though clearly beneficial, the extended course of almost daily postoperative radiotherapy interrupts normal activities and lengthens care. Additional options are now available that shorten the radiotherapy treatment time to 1-5 days (accelerated) and focus an increased dose of radiation on just the breast tissue around the excision cavity (partial breast). Recent trials with accelerated, partial breast irradiation (APBI) have shown promise as a potential replacement to the longer, whole breast treatments for select women with early-stage breast cancer. Current APBI approaches include interstitial brachytherapy, intracavitary (balloon) brachytherapy, and accelerated external beam (3-D conformal) radiotherapy, all of which normally complete treatment over 5 days, while intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) condenses the entire treatment into a single dose delivered immediately after tumor excision. Each approach has benefits and limitations. This study covers over 2 decades of clinical trials exploring APBI, discusses treatment variables that appear necessary for successful implementation of this new form of radiotherapy, compares and contrasts the various APBI approaches, and summarizes current and planned randomized trials that will shape if and how APBI is introduced into routine clinical care. Some of the more important outcome variables from these trials will be local toxicity, local and regional recurrence, and overall survival. If APBI options are ultimately demonstrated to be as safe and effective as current whole breast radiotherapy approaches, breast conservation may become an even more appealing choice, and the overall impact of treatment may be further reduced for certain women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer

AIMS

Incomplete excision leads to local recurrence following breast conservation therapy (BCT). The aim of this study was to examine factors associated with cavity margin (CM) positivity and return to theatre rates.

METHODS

Breast conservation surgery with entire CM excision was the initial procedure in 301 patients with 303 breast cancers. Of these, 258 patients were treated successfully with breast conservation surgery and 43 patients subsequently required a mastectomy for persistent involved margins. The mean and median follow-up was 38 and 42 (range 6-78) months, respectively.

RESULTS

Positive CMs were found in 73 out of 303 tumours. Large tumour size (p<0.001) and tumour type (invasive lobular cancer and ductal carcinoma in-situ) (p=0.043) were significant predictors of CM positivity both by univariate and multivariate analysis. As a result of CM status in relation to initial margin (IM) status, 60 cancers treated that were IM positive but CM negative avoided return for further excision at a second operative procedure.

CONCLUSION

Complete CM excision should avoid the need for further re-excision surgery in most patients where initial specimen margin was positive.

Young age and outcome for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with invasive breast carcinoma who are ages 35-40 years or younger at the time of diagnosis have been found in several studies to have worse prognosis and higher local failure rates after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) compared with older patients. However, it is uncertain whether specific clinical, pathologic, or treatment factors affect these results, or whether mastectomy yields a better outcome.

METHODS

Articles addressing how patient age at the time of diagnosis affects treatment outcome were identified through the MEDLINE and CancerLit databases and the reference lists of relevant articles.

RESULTS

Young age was found to remain an independent risk factor for worse outcome after either BCT or mastectomy. Limited evidence did not demonstrate a superior outcome with mastectomy compared with BCT. Recent studies of BCT still reported young age to be associated with higher local recurrence rates compared with that for older patients, but their interpretation was hampered by inadequate margin assessment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been found to improve local control rates substantially for young patients after BCT.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, there are insufficient data to determine whether young patients have superior long-term outcome if treated by mastectomy compared with BCT, or whether having truly uninvolved margins abrogates their increased risk of local failure after BCT. When meticulous attention is given to surgical techniques and margin status, it appears that young age at the time of diagnosis need not be a contraindication to BCT.

Caesium(137) implant as sole radiation therapy for operable breast cancer: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Clinical trials have indicated the need for irradiation of the tumour-bearing quadrant in patients with operable breast cancer treated by conservation therapy even under circumstances where there has been complete pathologic clearance. The aim of this phase II trial was to replace whole breast irradiation with brachytherapy to the tumour bed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 50 patients with operable breast cancers measuring <==4 cm diameter were treated by combination therapy comprising tumour excision axillary clearance and synoperative insertion of a rigid implant to the tumour bed. The implant was after-loaded with medium dose rate Cs(137) sources giving a dose of 45 Gy in daily four fractions of about 6 h duration. No external beam radiotherapy was given.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 6.3 years, of the 49 evaluable patients, 80% were alive without relapse. Of the 9 patients (18%) who developed a breast relapse, the site of recurrence was in the index quadrant in 7 cases (78%). Of the series, 26 (81%) gave a subjective rating of cosmetic outcome which was excellent or good. Objectively the treated breast was deemed to be normal in 11 (42%) and abnormal in 15 (58%).

CONCLUSIONS

This phase II study suggests that in a selected group of patients with early breast cancer, external whole breast radiotherapy can be replaced by interstitial irradiation to the tumour bed without compromising local disease control and giving an excellent or good cosmetic outcome in the majority of cases.

Rechute locale isolée après traitement conservateur pour un carcinome mammaire de stade I ou II, à propos de 57 patientes

PURPOSE

- To identify predicting factors of local control and survival after isolate local failure by statistical analysis of the data after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

- In time of local failure, mean age was 54.7 years old, mean tumor size was 19.3 mm and recurrence was more often infiltrating ductal carcinoma (88%). Local recurrence was unifocal in 44 cases and localised outside of the site of the primary tumorectomy in 35 cases. Local failure treatment was a radical mastectomy or parietectomy (53 patients). Hormonotherapy was delivered in 36 patients and chemotherapy was delivered in 26 patients. Mean follow-up was 62 months.

RESULTS

- Fifteen patients developed second local recurrence in a mean time of 36 months. Five years local control rate was 68% after the first local failure. Surgery treatment (non-conservative surgery vs. conservative surgery) was the only factor which influenced local control. Six patients developed homolateral axillary and/or supraclavicular node recurrence. Twelve patients underwent metastasis in a mean time of 36 months after the first local recurrence. Five years metastasis free survival rate was 80%. Peritumoral vascular invasion in time of the first local failure increased metastasis risk and node recurrence. Second local failure did not alter metastasis free survival.

CONCLUSION

- Peritumoral vascular invasion in time of the first local failure decreased node and metastasis free survival. Surgery should be radical, but the place of chemotherapy and hormonotherapy was not definite.

Breast cancer in the very young patient: a multidisciplinary case presentation

A case is presented that exemplifies many issues and controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in the very young. This woman was 22 years of age at diagnosis; she initially underwent breast-conservation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, retained fertility, had a subsequent uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery, and 7 years later developed a local recurrence in the breast. The discussion addresses risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer in the young; the impact of treatment on fertility; implications regarding pregnancy, and the management of local recurrence after breast conservation.

Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trials

PURPOSE

Risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy were compared to define guidelines for the decision making between both treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of two randomized clinical trials for stage I and II breast cancer patients were pooled. The total number of patients in the study was 1,772, of whom 879 underwent breast conservation, and 893, modified radical mastectomy. Representative slides of the primary tumor were available for histopathologic review in 1,610 cases (91%).

RESULTS

There were 79 patients with local recurrence after breast-conservation and 80 after mastectomy, the 10-year rates being 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 13%) and 9% (95% CI, 7% to 12%), respectively. Age no more than 35 years (compared with age >60: hazard ratio [HR], 9.24; 95% CI, 3.74 to 22.81) and an extensive intraductal component (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.26 to 5.00) were significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Vascular invasion was predictive of the risk of local recurrence, irrespective of the type of primary treatment (P <.01). Tumor size, nodal status, high histologic grade, and vascular invasion were all highly significant predictors of distant disease after breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy (P <.01). Age no more than 35 years and microscopic involvement of the excision margin were additional independent predictors of distant disease after breast-conserving therapy (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

Age no more than 35 years and the presence of an extensive intraductal component are associated with an increased risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Vascular invasion causes a higher risk of local recurrence after mastectomy as well as after breast-conserving therapy and should therefore not be used for deciding between the two treatments.

Breast conserving therapy in breast cancer patients presenting with nipple discharge

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review the outcome of conservatively treated breast cancer patients who present with nipple discharge at initial diagnosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The charts of 1097 patients undergoing conservative surgery and radiation therapy between January 1970 and December 1990 were reviewed. All patient data, including clinical, pathologic, treatment, and outcome variables were entered onto a computerized database. For the current study, specific attention was directed to the initial presenting symptoms and patients were divided into two groups: those presenting at initial diagnosis with nipple discharge (D/C-YES, n = 17), and those presenting without nipple discharge (D/C-NO, n = 1080).

RESULTS

As of August 1998, with a median follow-up of 12 years, the 10-year actuarial survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and breast relapse-free survival rates for the overall population were 73%, 78%, and 83%, respectively. Although the D/C-YES and D/C-NO groups were well balanced with respect to the majority of clinical factors, the D/C-YES patients had a higher percentage of DCIS histology (7.3% vs 1.2%, p < 0.01), were less likely to undergo reexcision (12% vs 35%), and were more frequently under age 40 (35% vs 12%) than the D/C-NO patients. Over the time span of this study, status of the final surgical margin was indeterminate in the majority of cases. Local relapses occurred in 6 of the 17 patients in the D/C-YES group, resulting in a 10-year actuarial breast relapse-free survival rate of 50%, which was signifcantly lower than the 10-year breast relapse-free survival rate of 86% in the D/C-NO population. Among the patients presenting with nipple discharge, those with sacrifice of the nipple areolar complex had a lower local relapse rate than those patients who had conservation of the nipple areolar complex (20% vs 42%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients presenting with nipple discharge may be suitable candidates for radiation therapy, local relapse rates were higher than those presenting without nipple discharge. The limitations of the study and implications regarding breast conserving management in patients presenting with nipple discharge are discussed.

High local recurrence risk after breast-conserving therapy in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients is greatly reduced by one course of perioperative chemotherapy: A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study

PURPOSE

Patients with invasive breast cancer may develop a local recurrence (LR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Younger age has been found to be an independent risk factor for LR. Within a group of premenopausal node-negative breast cancer patients, we studied risk factors for LR and the effect of perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) on LR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conducted a randomized trial (EORTC 10854) to compare surgery followed by one course of PeCT (fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) with surgery alone. From patients treated on this trial, we selected premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer who were treated with BCT to examine whether histologic characteristics and the expression of various proteins (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, Ki-67, bcl-2, CD31, c-erbB-2/neu) are risk factors for subsequent LR. Also, the effect of one course of PeCT on the LR risk (LRR) was studied.

RESULTS

Using multivariate analysis, age younger than 43 years (relative risk [RR], 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 5.18; P =.002), multifocal growth (RR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 8.77; P =.014), and elevated levels of p53 (RR, 2. 14; 95% CI, 1.13 to 4.05; P =.02) were associated with higher LRR. Also, PeCT was found to reduce LRR by more than 50% (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.86; P =.02). Patients younger than 43 years who received PeCT achieved similar LR rates as those of patients younger than 43 years who were treated with BCT alone.

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal node-negative patients, age younger than 43 years is the most important risk factor for LR after BCT; this risk is greatly reduced by one course of PeCT. The main reason for administering systemic adjuvant treatment is to improve overall survival. The important reduction of LR after BCT is an additional reason for considering systemic treatment in young node-negative patients with breast cancer.

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for early-stage invasive cancer

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) following conservative surgery and radiation for early stage invasive cancer occurs in approximately 15% of all patients at 10 years and is diminished with surgical excisions which achieve negative margins. Treatment strategies of breast-conserving surgery with or without radiation that result in IBTR rates of 30 40% will impact negatively on survival and the magnitude of this effect will be influenced by the predominant pattern of local failure as well as initial and subsequent distant metastases. Optimal local control in early-stage invasive breast cancer is important to minimize the risk of a salvage mastectomy and maximize the potential for long-term survival.

Concurrent CMF and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: results of a pilot study

PURPOSE

The optimal sequencing of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy is unresolved. Given the concerns arising from delaying either CT or RT, we conducted a pilot study of a concurrent CT-RT regimen in the hope that this would reduce side effects without decreasing efficacy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1992-1994, 112 patients with 0-3 positive nodes received 6 monthly cycles of classic oral chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF). On day 15 of cycle 1, patients started tangential field RT (39.6 Gy in 22 fractions), followed by a 16 Gy boost in 8 fractions. Median follow-up time for surviving patients was 53 months.

RESULTS

Moist desquamation developed during or shortly after RT in 50% of patients, but only 5 patients required treatment breaks. Grade 4 neutropenia during RT occurred in 16 patients, but only 1 required hospitalization. One patient developed Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis. Ninety-three percent of patients received at least 85% of prescribed drug doses. Cosmetic scores of 51 evaluable patients approximately 2 years after the end of chemotherapy were 47% excellent, 43% good, and 10% fair. We have observed 4 local failures and 20 distant failures.

CONCLUSIONS

This concurrent CT-RT scheme had acceptable toxicity and outcome. Further comparison of this approach allowing prompt initiation of both CT and RT to alternative sequences is warranted.

Surgical considerations for invasive breast cancer

The 1992 NIH Consensus Development Conference reported that "breast conservation treatment is an appropriate method of primary therapy for the majority of women with stage I and II breast cancer and is preferable because it provides survival equivalent to total mastectomy and axillary dissection while preserving the breast." This conclusion has been solidly confirmed by recent updates of all of the prospective clinical trials performed. The uneven utilization of this BCS indicates the personal discomfort of some surgeons in recommending it or in communicating their recommendations to patients. The appropriate candidate for mastectomy is the patient in whom it is evident that BCS will not control the tumor. This conclusion may be drawn after one or even two attempts at revision have shown more extensive microscopic disease. The experience with preoperative chemotherapy programs such as NSABP Protocol B-18 shows that even for larger tumors primary excision or excision after preoperative chemotherapy provides reasonable rates of local control with no evidence of diminished distant control or survival. Very large tumors, often accompanied by other grave signs, are best treated by primary chemotherapy, because they are essentially not stage I or stage II disease. Although recognizing that better long-term cure rates are a function of the treatment of micrometastases with adjuvant chemotherapy, surgeons should remember the need to balance cosmetic factors with techniques required for good local control. Cosmetic factors are always important, but the primary concern is adequate removal of the primary tumor with pathologically negative margins. The best way to prevent the need for a salvage mastectomy following local recurrence is to obtain adequate control at the initial procedure, but this does not mean that aggressive local surgery is needed, and it certainly does not mean that a primary mastectomy is needed except in unusual cases.

The role of radiation therapy for primary breast cancer

Radiation therapy for breast cancer has gone through two revolutions in the last two decades: the routine use of radiation therapy in conjunction with breast-conserving surgery as an equivalent treatment to mastectomy, and the use of radiation therapy following mastectomy in advanced or node-positive disease. Indeed, the perception of postmastectomy radiation has gone full circle: from having no benefit when used for all cases, to being detrimental because of cardiac irradiation, to the present in which the selective use of irradiation in high-risk patients provides both an improvement in local control and an improvement of 8% to 10% in the survival rate. Improvements in radiation technique have reduced complications, in particular late cardiac deaths. The major issues still to be resolved are the targets for postmastectomy irradiation, determining which patients do not need radiation therapy for DCIS and for node-negative disease, and the efficacy of delivering radiation to just the affected quadrant rather than to the whole breast. At present, most patients approach radiation therapy for breast cancer with the knowledge that it has a very high probability of being successful.

Why and how to combine chemotherapy and radiation therapy in breast cancer patients

The ideal sequencing of CT and radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and RT is not known. There is evidence that delaying CT might have an adverse impact on systemic control, while delaying RT might adversely affect local control. Concurrent CT and full-dose RT might minimize the above tradeoffs, but is associated with increased toxicity. Concurrent CT and reduced-dose RT is a novel approach to address these issues, but requires additional formal evaluation before clinical use. In the absence of definitive information, clinicians should balance each patient's risk for systemic recurrence and local-regional recurrence. For example, a patient with a large number of positive nodes but clearly negative margins would be an appropriate candidate for adjuvant therapy starting with CT and continuing with RT at the completion of CT. Alternatively, a patient with node-negative disease with close or focally positive margins might be an appropriate candidate for initiating RT sooner. Current treatment regimens which deliver CT in a "short" time period [i.e., Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide) delivered in four 3-week cycles] may represent a reasonable tradeoff with regard to promptly starting systemic therapy while initiating RT within 3 months of surgery. It is possible that optimizing the way RT and CT are combined is important in achieving the highest survival rate and in reducing long-term adverse effects. There is unfortunately very little solid information from randomized clinical trials addressing this question, and considerable controversy remains regarding the optimal approach to integrating these modalities. Additional randomized clinical trials addressing this important clinical question are needed.

Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of local failure (LF) in the survival of patients treated with lumpectomy and postoperative radiotherapy and to investigate whether LF is not only a marker for distant metastasis (DM) but also a cause.

METHODS

Charts of patients treated with breast conservative surgery between 1969 and 1991 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 2,030 patients available for analysis. The median duration of follow-up was 6 years. A Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed using LF as a time-dependent covariate.

RESULTS

Local control (LC) was 87% at 10 years. Local failure led to poorer survival at 10 years than local control (55% v 75%, P < .00). In a Cox model, local failure was a powerful predictor of mortality. The relative risk associated with LF was 3.6 for mortality and 5.1 for DM (P < .00). In patients with LF, the rate of DM peaked at 5 to 6 years, whereas it peaked at 2 years for patients with LC. The mean time between surgery and DM was 1,050 days for patients without LF and 1,650 days for patients with LF (P < .00).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that local failure is associated with an increase in mortality. The difference in the time distribution of distant metastasis for LF and LC could imply distinct mechanisms of dissemination. Local failure should be considered not only as a marker of occult circulating distant metastases but also as a source for new distant metastases and subsequent mortality.

Long-term follow-up of axillary node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen alone: patterns of recurrence

PURPOSE

To determine the patterns, incidence and risk factors for local-regional recurrence in patients with Stage II and III breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen alone, without adjuvant radiation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The records of patients referred to the London Regional Cancer Centre with a diagnosis of breast cancer between 1980-1989 were reviewed. During this time period, it was the policy of the institution to omit local-regional radiation to patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. One hundred and fifty axillary node-positive Stage II and III breast cancer patients received adjuvant tamoxifen alone without postoperative local-regional radiation; these patients form the basis of this report.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 67 months for the entire patient group and 85 months for the living patients. During this time, 42% of patients developed a recurrence, 22% first recurred in local-regional sites. The total incidence of local-regional recurrence (including those patients who first relapsed with systemic metastases) was 30%. Of the segmental mastectomy patients, 13% had recurrences in the intact breast. Of the modified radical mastectomy patients, 10% developed chest wall recurrences. Five percent of recurrences were first in the axilla and 6% in the supraclavicular nodes. Five-year actuarial survival for the entire patient group was 79% and disease-free survival was 60%, with a median disease-free survival time of 87 months. Five-year local-regional relapse-free survival was 76%. Five-year local-regional relapse-free survival was < 76% for those patients with 4 or more positive axillary nodes, regardless of tumor size. On univariable analysis, positive resection margins, number of positive axillary nodes, menopausal status, and negative estrogen and progesterone receptors were significant for isolated local-regional recurrence. On multivariable analysis, only positive resection margins and negative receptors remained significant. In terms of regional recurrence specifically, negative estrogen and progesterone-receptor status and positive resection margins were, again, prognostically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen who have positive resection margins, > or = 4 positive axillary nodes and/or negative estrogen and progesterone receptors, are at higher risk of local and regional recurrence and should, therefore, receive local-regional radiation.

Feasibility of postmastectomy radiation therapy after TRAM flap breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has been shown to decrease locoregional failure rates in high-risk breast cancer patients following modified radical mastectomy. However, there had not been a study evaluating the effect of PORT in patients after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. Therefore, we evaluated flap viability, cosmetic results, and locoregional recurrence in patients who underwent TRAM flap reconstruction and PORT.

METHODS

The charts of patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy with TRAM flap reconstruction and PORT at our institution were reviewed. Patients were examined in the clinic and interviewed by telephone to evaluate their perceptions of the cosmetic result.

RESULTS

PORT was delivered to 19 patients with TRAM flaps (3 pedicled and 16 free flaps) between 1988 and 1994. There were no TRAM flap losses as a result of either surgical or radiotherapy complications. Two patients developed fat necrosis, one with a pedicled and one with a free TRAM flap. Patients with pedicled TRAM flaps noted more volume loss in the breast after radiation therapy. Eighty-four percent of patients felt their overall cosmetic result was excellent or good; only one patient reported a poor cosmetic result. Local control was achieved in three of the four patients who received PORT for local recurrence. There was only one local recurrence among the 14 patients who received PORT because they were at high risk of local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that PORT can be given safely to high-risk patients following TRAM flap breast reconstruction with excellent cosmetic results and good locoregional control.

Long-term follow-up of axillary node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy alone: patterns of recurrence

PURPOSE

Prognostic factors for locoregional failure have been poorly documented. The purpose of this retrospective review is to examine the patterns of failure of 320 patients with Stage II or III axillary node-positive breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy without locoregional radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of 735 patients who were referred to the London Regional Cancer Centre between 1980 and 1989 with a diagnosis of Stage II or III breast cancer were reviewed. Three hundred and twenty patients were identified who underwent segmental mastectomy with axillary dissection or modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy without adjuvant locoregional radiation. Seventy-one percent of these patients had undergone a modified radical mastectomy, 40% had T1 tumors, 49% T2, and 11% T3. Resection margins were positive in 13 patients. The median number of axillary nodes removed was 11. Fifty-four percent had one to three positive axillary nodes, 27% had four to seven positive nodes, and 19% had in excess of seven positive nodes.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for the 320 patients was 77 months. One hundred and fourteen patients developed a locoregional recurrence as the site of first relapse (31 in the intact breast, 29 on the chest wall, 21 in the axilla, 22 in the supraclavicular fossa, 1 in the internal mammary chain, and 10 in multiple sites). Thirty-three percent of segmental mastectomy patients and 13% of modified radical mastectomy patients developed local recurrence. Seven percent of patients recurred in axillary or supraclavicular nodes each. Factors with regard to locoregional recurrence which on univariate analysis were significant included type of mastectomy (i.e., segmental vs. modified radical), size of primary tumor, positive resection margins, and percentage of ideal chemotherapy dose intensity (< 66% vs. > or = 66%). After multivariate analysis, only type of mastectomy, size of primary tumor, and percentage of ideal chemotherapy dose intensity retained significance. The number of positive axillary nodes was not a significant factor. Number of positive axillary nodes plus the above four clinical factors were analyzed in terms of regional recurrence specifically. By univariate and multivariate analysis, only size of primary tumor retained significance. Again, the number of positive axillary nodes was not a relevant factor.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who are at high risk of locoregional recurrence include those who undergo segmental mastectomy and those with larger tumors (> 5 cm in diameter). Breast or chest wall radiation is recommended for these groups. Supraclavicular radiation is recommended for patients with tumors larger than 5 cm in diameter. Axillary recurrences were relatively infrequent in patients who had undergone an adequate Level I and II axillary dissection, and therefore, axillary radiation was not recommended.

[Role of radiotherapy in the management of adenocarcinoma of the breast accessible to conservative surgery]

Standard treatment for limited stage adenocarcinoma of the breast includes lumpectomy (or a quadrantectomy), axillary node dissection, regional radiation therapy and, if the prognostic factors are unfavourable, chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. This is supported by the results of American and European randomised trials. There have been many attempts at improving the modalities of conservative surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in order to maximize local control and minimize late sequellae. It is also likely that induction chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy applied in selected cases increase the proportion of patients who can be offered conservative surgery.

Breast conservation: predictors and treatment of local recurrence

Breast conservation therapy has become the preferred treatment for many Stage I and II breast cancers as the "Halstedian" theory of sequential spread has been replaced by the belief that breast cancer is a systemic disease and that local-regional therapy has little impact on overall survival. Local recurrence after conservation therapy is reportedly dependent upon a number of pathological, clinical, and treatment factors. This review examines the complex relationships among these factors, their ability to predict for residual disease within the breast, and its correlation with risk for local recurrence. A local recurrence does not appear to affect overall survival, and salvage therapy provides excellent local control in the majority of cases. The proper salvage therapy is evolving, with mastectomy the current standard. However, repeat wide-excision surgery may offer good local control in a select group of patients.

Evaluation of HER-2 neu oncoprotein expression as a prognostic indicator of local recurrence in conservatively treated breast cancer: a case-control study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the prognostic significance of overexpression of the HER-2 neu oncoprotein with respect to local relapse following conservative surgery and radiation therapy (CS + RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty consecutive patients who sustained a local recurrence as the first and only site of failure following CS + RT comprised the case population base for this study. Only patients who received no adjuvant systemic chemotherapy or tamoxifen were selected for analysis. Following the identification of 20 consecutive local-relapse patients, the patient database was searched for 20 matching control patients who did not sustain a local relapse. Each control patient was matched to the index case with respect to age, menopausal status, follow-up, primary histology, axillary nodal status, and primary tumor size. Both index cases and the matched control group received full course radiation therapy, to a total dose of 64 Gy to the tumor bed. The paraffin-embedded blocks of the original primary tumor of the local-relapse cases and the primary tumor of 20 matched controls were processed for immunohistochemical staining of the HER-2 neu oncoprotein. Each slide was rated on the 3-point scale, 0 representing no stain, 1+ indicating light staining, and 2+ denoted heavy staining (overexpression).

RESULTS

Of the 20 index cases, with each of the matched controls, 16 were evaluable for analysis. The 4 cases that were eliminated had inadequate paraffin-embedded material in either the case or the match control for adequate staining. By design of the study, the index case group and control group had similar ages (52 years index vs. 51.4 control), follow-up (10.8 years index vs. 10.5 years control), and histologies. For the immunostaining, a value of 2+ was considered to denote high activity and overexpression, and 0 and 1+ were considered negative values. Using these criteria, a total of 9 of the 16 index cases (56%) exhibited overexpression of HER-2 neu oncoprotein, and only 3 of the 16 control cases (18%) demonstrated high immunoreactivity. The difference in immunostaining between the index and control cases was statistically significant by a Pierson chi-square analysis at the p = 0.03 level.

CONCLUSIONS

In this matched case-control study, overexpression of the HER-2 neu oncoprotein appears to have prognostic significance with respect to local relapse in the conservatively treated breast. The correlation of overexpression of HER-2 neu by multivariable analysis with other prognostic factors for local recurrence warrants further investigation. The clinical implications of the study are discussed.

Long-term results of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study was done to determine the long-term outcome of breast conservation therapy (BCT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer during a period of treatment evolution at a single institution.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Breast cancer treatment has evolved from extensive surgical extirpation of the breast to treatment options that conserve the breast. Prospective and retrospective studies have confirmed the efficacy of BCT and justify its use for many patients with early breast cancer, but there is no universally accepted consensus as to who benefits from more aggressive application of surgery or radiotherapy in BCT. Prognostic variables for breast cancer and information on factors that contribute to local recurrence help predict BCT results. Continued analysis of BCT still is necessary to improve patient outcome.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients treated with BCT (lumpectomy with adjuvant radiation therapy) at the Medical College of Virginia from 1980 to 1990 were identified. Clinicopathologic parameters and treatment details were analyzed for relationship to development of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival. Fisher's exact test was used for comparisons. Actuarial survival curves were plotted. The earlier treatment period (1980-1985) was compared with the later treatment period (1985-1990).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5 years. Actuarial overall survival was 83% at 5 years (69% at 10 years), and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival was 79%. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rate was 6.6% (crude rate 10.6%, 9/85). Young patients (age < 40 years) were found to be at increased risk for local recurrence (24% < 40 years vs. 6% > or = 40 years, p < 0.05). Tumor margins < or = 3 mm were more frequently found, and lumpectomy site radiation boost was used increasingly from 1986 to 1990. Almost half of all local recurrences occurred after 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival and local recurrence rates were comparable to other series. Young patients were found to be at increased risk for local recurrence. Negative microscopic margins, even when close, can provide low local recurrence rates when adjuvant radiation therapy is administered.

Comparison of breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy for treatment of early breast cancer in community hospitals

Although the results of clinical trials support breast-conserving therapy as a replacement for mastectomy in early breast cancer, the question remains whether these results apply in routine clinical practice. In the present analysis the breast cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival of 464 consecutive patients with breast tumors < or = 3 cm across undergoing breast-conserving therapy were compared with a group of 459 patients with similar extent of disease and period of diagnosis undergoing mastectomy. All patients were treated in community hospitals in the south-eastern Netherlands. Median follow-up of both treatment groups was 6.2 years. After adjustment for the prognostic effects of age, tumour size, axillary nodal status and adjuvant systemic therapy, neither breast cancer-specific survival nor recurrence-free survival differed significantly between the breast-conserving therapy group and the mastectomy group. This finding indicates that in routine clinical practice breast-conserving therapy may be as effective as mastectomy.

Local recurrences after breast-conserving treatment: an open problem

Breast-preserving surgery for tumors of limited size or reduced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy has definitely entered into the practice. Distant results of controlled studies demonstrated that conservative methods, when correctly indicated and performed, can provide the same results as mutilating procedures, in terms of overall survival. There is general agreement on the fact that conservation bears a major risk of intrabreast recurrences, whose meaning and impact on prognosis are still open to debate. Inadequate surgery, i.e., too-limited excision, or the lack of radiotherapy, certainly causes a higher rate of local failures. However, analysis of the patient series reported in the literature permits the conclusion that local failures and distant metastasis are events partially independent of each other. In other words, there are factors that are predictive of local recurrence, and not of distant spread, and vice versa, and factors that affect both the risks. Uncertainty about the meaning of local recurrences influences therapeutic attitudes, not only with regard to the choice between total mastectomy and re-resection, when possible, but also with reference to the identification of those local recurrences that merit systemic treatment. As far as the treatment of local failures is concerned, it is too soon to indicate undisputable guidelines. It is necessary to wait for distant results of the many experiences in progress on this issue. On the other hand, since local intrabreast recurrences fortunately are not very frequent (about 10% at 10 years from first treatment), the accrual of patients eligible for clinical trials would take a long time, even for cooperative groups. This is one of the reasons why local failure actually is an open problem.

Routine or delayed axillary dissection for primary breast cancer?

Prophylactic lymph node excision has long been recommended for preventing axillary recurrence of primary breast cancer, and has more recently gained support from the finding that adjuvant systemic therapy preferentially benefits patients with axillary node metastases. Despite these justifications, medical opinion in many communities has become deeply polarised over the merits of routine axillary dissection. A factor likely to be contributing to this split is the popularity of prescribing adjuvant systemic therapy (usually tamoxifen) on an expectant basis. Since there has been no controlled assessment of the net benefits of axillary dissection in patients receiving routine adjuvant systemic therapy--followed where necessary by delayed ("salvage") axillary treatment--objective data are urgently needed. If no substantial benefit is lost by replacing routine with delayed dissection, a small but significant improvement in quality of life could be expected for the majority of breast cancer patients.

The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation

BACKGROUND

The impact of the surgical margin status on long-term local control rates for breast cancer in women treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy is unclear.

METHODS

The records of 289 women with 303 invasive breast cancers who were treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy from 1972 to 1992 were reviewed. The surgical margin was classified as positive (transecting the inked margin), close (less than or equal to 2 mm from the margin), negative, or indeterminate, based on the initial biopsy findings and reexcision specimens, as appropriate. Various clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed as potential prognostic factors for local recurrence in addition to the margin status, including T classification, N classification, age, histologic features, and use of adjuvant therapy. The mean follow-up was 6.25 years.

RESULTS

The actuarial probability of freedom from local recurrence for the entire group of patients at 5 and 10 years was 94% and 87%, respectively. The actuarial probability of local control at 10 years was 98% for those patients with negative surgical margins versus 82% for all others (P = 0.007). The local control rate at 10 years was 97% for patients who underwent reexcision and 84% for those who did not. Reexcision appears to convey a local control benefit for those patients with close, indeterminate, or positive initial margins, when negative final margins are attained (P = 0.0001). Final margin status was the most significant determinant of local recurrence rates in univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, the final margin status and use of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The attainment of negative surgical margins, initially or at the time of reexcision, is the most significant predictor of local control after breast-conserving treatment with lumpectomy and radiation therapy.

Ten-year results in 1070 patients with stages I and II breast cancer treated by conservative surgery and radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

One thousand seventy patients treated conservatively for Stages I and II breast cancer between the years 1982 and 1994 were reviewed. The median follow-up was 40 months with a maximum follow-up of 152 months.

METHODS

All patients had a wide local excision and lower lymph axillary node dissection followed by radiation therapy. The entire breast received an external beam dose of 4500 cGy at 180 cGy/5 days/week. An additional boost dose of 2000 cGy to the tumor bed was given at the time of lumpectomy (perioperative) with an Ir-192 implant or with electron beam therapy after the external beam therapy.

RESULTS

The 5- and 10-year disease specific survival results were 97 and 90%, respectively for Stage I and 87 and 69% for patients with Stage II disease. The 5- and 10-year local control rates were 93 and 85% for Stage I and 92 and 87% for Stage II, respectively. The risk factors for local failure were premenopausal status and estrogen receptor-negative status at the univariate level but at the multivariate level the premenopausal and margins status were significant.

CONCLUSION

These 10-year results were at least equivalent to reported series of similarly staged patients treated by mastectomy. This should encourage more surgeons to offer conservative treatment as an alternative to mastectomy to patients with Stage I and II breast cancer.

Tamoxifen with and without radiation after partial mastectomy in patients with involved nodes

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of tamoxifen on local control after partial mastectomy with and without adjuvant breast irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective study of 97 node positive patients identified from the records of the London Regional Cancer Center included 44 patients who received tamoxifen and breast irradiation (40 or 50 Gy plus booster dose) after partial mastectomy, and 53 patients who received tamoxifen only after partial mastectomy. Base line characteristics of the two groups were similar.

RESULTS

At 39 months actuarial follow-up there was a breast tumor recurrence (BTR) in 5% vs. 21% of patients when radiation was omitted (p = 0.0388), but there was no difference in the cause-specific mortality of the two treatment groups. Cox Regression analysis (on only 10 BTR) showed age and adjuvant radiation as significant predictors of BTR. In patients not receiving radiation, no BTR was seen in 22 patients > or = 70 years of age at diagnosis vs. 8 BTR in 31 patients < 70 years (p = 0.0130). All BTR occurred while patients were receiving tamoxifen.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamoxifen alone with omission of radiation after partial mastectomy provides inferior breast tumor control in node positive patients. This is especially true for patients under 70 years of age. Patients aged 70 years or older at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer who receive tamoxifen have a low rate of breast tumor recurrence when radiation is omitted. These patients represent a group for whom radiation might not be necessary.

Breast conservation treatment of early stage breast cancer: patterns of failure

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively assesses the patterns of failure in conservatively treated early stage breast cancer patients by correlating various clinical, pathologic, and treated-related factors with local, axillary, and distant relapse.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1973 and 1990, 796 patients (817 breasts) received breast conservation surgery followed by radiotherapy. Local recurrences were counted as events even if they occurred simultaneously or after the appearance of axillary or distant metastases.

RESULTS

The 10-year actuarial relative disease-free survival (DFS) rate for T1N0, T2N0, and T1-2N1 was 82%, 71%, and 54%, respectively. Stage N0 patients had a significant DFS advantage over N1 patients (p = 0.02). The 15-year actuarial local recurrence-free rate for T1 and T2 tumors was 82% and 87%, respectively (p = nonsignificant). Univariate analysis identified three significant risk factors for local relapse: (a) 48 breasts with tumors showing an extensive intraductal component had a crude local recurrence rate of 23% compared to 8% for 769 breasts without intraductal component (p = 0.0016); (b) the actuarial 10-year local recurrence-free rate for patients under age 40 years was 64% compared to 88% for patients over 40 years (p < 0.0001); (c) the 10-year actuarial local recurrence-free rate for 416 postmenopausal women without adjuvant tamoxifen was 83% compared to 97% for 107 postmenopausal women with tamoxifen (p = 0.0479). Salvage therapy for operable local recurrent patients resulted in a 8-year actuarial DFS rate of 47%, significantly lower than that obtained with primary treatment. The incidence of axillary relapse as the first sign of recurrence was 2%, and could be correlated with the lack of axillary dissection (p < 0.0000005) and primary tumor size (p = 0.03). Radiotherapy to the axilla did not influence axillary relapse. Actuarial 5-year DFS rate after treatment of isolated axillary recurrence was 27%. Axillary failure was a marker for distant failure. Contralateral breast cancer occurred in 8% of patients and did not have a detrimental effect on survival. Adjuvant tamoxifen decreased the 9-year actuarial incidence of contralateral breast cancer from 10% to 4% (p = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors with extensive intraductal component, age under 40 years, and the omission of adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal women increased local recurrence rate. Stage T2 and the lack of axillary dissection increased axillary recurrence rate. Stage N+ and local or axillary relapse increased distant failure rate. Axillary irradiation did not influence locoregional control nor survival. Improved therapy is needed for relapsing patients.

Early breast cancer: influence of type of boost (electrons vs iridium-192 implant) on local control and cosmesis after conservative surgery and radiation therapy

Between December 1981 and December 1988, 329 consecutive patients with stage I and II breast cancers who underwent wide excision (n = 261) or quadrantectomy (n = 68) with (n = 303) or without (n = 26) axillary dissection were referred to radiotherapy. Final margins of resection were microscopically free from tumor involvement in all cases. Radiotherapy consisted in 40-45 Gy over 4-4.5 weeks to the breast, with (n = 168) or without (n = 161) regional nodal irradiation of 45-50 Gy over 4.5-5 weeks. A mean booster dose of 15 Gy was delivered to the primary site by iridium-192 implant in 169 patients (group 1) or by electrons in 160 patients (group 2). Twenty-seven percent (n = 88) of patients received tamoxifen for > or = 2 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 22% (n = 71) of patients. Groups 1 and 2 were not strictly comparable. Group 1 patients were significantly younger, had smaller tumors, were treated with cobalt at 5 x 2 Gy per week and axillary dissection was more frequently performed. Group 2 patients were more frequently bifocal and more frequently treated by quadrantectomy and tamoxifen, and irradiation used accelerator photons at 4 x 2.50 Gy per week. No difference in terms of follow-up and survival rates was observed between the two groups. For all patients the 5- and 10-year local breast relapse rates were 6.7% and 11%, respectively. No difference was observed regarding local control either by the electron or the iridium-192 implant boosts. Axillary dissection and age had an impact on the breast cosmetic outcome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dose and volume effects on fibrosis after breast conservation therapy

PURPOSE

To analyze factors involved in the development of fibrosis in the boost area after breast conservation therapy (BCT) in patients treated with continuous low dose rate iridium implants following 50 Gy whole breast irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fibrosis was estimated by palpation in 404 patients by four physicians. The median follow-up (FUP) duration was 70 months (range 30-133 months). Original implant data were used for reconstruction and dose-volume calculations. The total dose of the external whole breast irradiation and iridium implants was expressed in Normalized Total Dose (NTD): the total dose given in fractions of 2 Gy, which is biologically equivalent to the actual dose given according to the linear-quadratic model, using an alpha/beta value of 2 Gy, and 1.5 h for the recovery half-life of sublethal damage repair. To identify predictors of fibrosis we used a proportional odds model in a polychotomous logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seven independent factors were identified that were related to the severity of fibrosis: age, duration of FUP, clinical T-size, photon beam energy, NTD level, implant volume, and adjuvant chemotherapy. From the proportional odds model, a volume exponent could be estimated (0.16 +/- 0.04) that enabled us to determine dose-effect relations for different volumes. A 10-fold higher risk of fibrosis was seen when the total dose was above 79 Gy as compared with doses lower than 70 Gy. A fourfold increase in risk of fibrosis was seen for each 100 cm3 increase in irradiated boost volume. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in a twofold increase in the risk of fibrosis (dose modifying factor approximately 1.08). The application of Co-60 beams had a similar effect. The relative odds for the other factors were smaller (1.4 for each 10 years of older age, and 1.2 for clinical T-size over 20 mm). The FUP-period had a nonlinear effect: relative odds 2.2 at 6 years, 3.6 at 7-8 years, and 2.8 at 9-11 years. The dose rate (mean 0.57, range 0.26-0.89 Gy/h) had no influence on the development of fibrosis and there was no correlation between dose rate and irradiated volume.

CONCLUSIONS

To optimize cosmetic results after BCT, both the total dose and the irradiated volume should be kept as low as possible. Minimum effective dose levels still have to be established. The boost volume can be minimized by more conformal brachytherapy techniques and optimal localization. It may be worthwhile to take adjuvant chemotherapy into account in decisions on boost dose levels.

The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of young age on outcome in women with early stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1981 and 1991, 980 patients with Stage I and II breast cancer underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and radiation. The median follow-up was 4.6 years, with a range of 1 month to 11 years. The patients were divided into three groups, based on age at the time of diagnosis: (a) age < or = 35 years--64 patients, (b) age 36-50 years--363 patients, and (c) age > 50 years--553 patients. The comparability of the groups was assessed in terms of clinical factors (tumor size and race), histopathologic factors (histologic subtype, final resection margin, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, pathologic nodal status), and treatment related factors (reexcision, median total dose to the primary, region(s) treated with radiation, and the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen). Outcome was evaluated for overall, relapse-free, and cause-specific survival and patterns of first failure (breast, regional nodes, and distant metastasis).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of race, clinical tumor size, pathology of the primary tumor, pathologic nodal status, final margin of resection, progesterone receptor status, median total dose to the primary tumor, or the regions treated. However, younger women were significantly more likely to have estrogen receptor negative tumors, undergo reexcision, and receive adjuvant systemic chemotherapy without tamoxifen. Younger women were found to have a statistically significantly decreased 8-year actuarial relapse-free survival (53% vs. 67% vs. 74%, p = 0.009), cause-specific survival (73% vs. 84% vs. 90%, p = 0.02), freedom from distant metastasis (76% vs. 75% vs. 83%, p = 0.02), and a significantly increased risk of breast recurrence (24% vs. 14% vs. 12%, p = 0.001), and regional node recurrence (7% vs. 1% vs. 1%, p = 0.0002). The patients were further divided on the basis of their pathologic nodal status. There were no statistically significant differences among the three age groups for axillary node-positive patients for overall survival (75% vs. 80% vs. 74%), relapse-free survival (73% vs. 73% vs. 62%), cause-specific survival (76% vs. 85% vs. 80%), and freedom from distant metastasis (75% vs. 75% vs. 72%), or breast recurrence (0% vs. 9% vs. 6%). The findings were identical when the analysis was restricted to node-positive patients who received chemotherapy. However, for axillary node-negative women, young age was associated with a statistically significant decreased overall survival (71% vs. 83% vs. 92%), relapse-free survival (51% vs. 65% vs. 76%), cause-specific survival (71% vs. 86% vs. 93%), freedom from distant metastasis (77% vs. 76% vs. 88%), and a statistically significant increased risk of breast recurrence (40% vs. 16% vs. 13%), and regional node recurrence (3% vs. 1% vs. 0%). The risk of a breast recurrence in axillary node-negative young women was decreased by the addition of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy but not by the use of reexcision.

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis demonstrates that young women with early stage breast cancer do significantly worse when compared to older women in terms of relapse-free survival, cause-specific survival, distant metastasis and breast and regional node recurrence. However, the adverse effect of young age on outcome appears to be limited to the node-negative patients. These findings suggest that node-negative early stage breast cancer in young women is a more aggressive disease, with an increased risk for all patterns of failure and a decreased survival.

Selection of patients for breast conserving surgery

The majority of patients with breast cancer can be treated by partial mastectomy and radiation therapy. Ineligibility for breast conservation usually is related to previous radiation or the inability to receive radiation for other reasons. For patients who can receive radiation, selection for breast conservation involves the estimation of the risk for in-breast recurrence and the ability to achieve a satisfactory cosmetic result. Multiple sites of cancer within the breast and the inability to attain negative pathologic margins on the excised breast specimen are predictive for an increased risk of recurrence. The cosmetic result is compromised by excision of large volumes of breast tissue. Although the size of the tumor is not an important consideration for in-breast recurrence, the relation of the size of the tumor, and hence the volume of tissue excised, to the size of the breast is an important cosmetic consideration. Compared to invasive ductal carcinoma, an extensive intraductal component or invasive lobular carcinoma tends to be more difficult to define within the breast and may require excision of a large volume of tissue to obtain negative pathologic margins.

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Effect on local recurrence in the conservatively treated breast cancer patient

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy on local relapse in the conservatively treated breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Before December 1989, 548 patients underwent lumpectomy with axillary dissection followed by radiation therapy to the intact breast. Adjuvant systemic therapy was administered as clinically indicated. The majority of patients with pathologically involved lymph nodes received adjuvant systemic therapy, whereas those with pathologically negative lymph nodes received no adjuvant systemic therapy. The majority of patients received a course of radiation therapy either concomitant with or before systemic therapy. In only nine cases was radiation therapy delayed more than 16 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

As of June 1992, the 548 patients had a median follow-up of 6.4 years. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, patient age and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy were statistically significant independent prognostic factors relating to breast relapse. Those patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy had a lower breast relapse than those who did not. Among patients who received tamoxifen, there was a statistically insignificant trend toward a lower relapse rate compared with those who did not receive tamoxifen.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears from this retrospective analysis that patients who received adjuvant systemic therapy, either concomitantly or after their course of radiation therapy, had a lower relapse rate in the conservatively treated breast than those patients who received no adjuvant systemic therapy.

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6

The aim of this study was to assess a potential advantage in survival by neoadjuvant as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. 414 premenopausal patients with T2-T3 N0-N1 M0 breast cancer were randomised to receive either four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil), followed by local-regional treatment (group I) or four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after primary irradiation +/- surgery (group II). Surgery was limited to those patients with a persisting mass after irradiation, and aimed to be as conservative as possible. 390 patients were evaluable. With a median follow-up of 54 months, we observed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.039) in survival in favour of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. A similar trend was seen when the time to metastatic recurrence was evaluated (P = 0.09). At this stage, no difference in disease-free interval or local recurrence between these two groups could be observed. The mean total dose of chemotherapy administered was similar in both groups. On average, group I had more intensive chemotherapy regimes (doxorubicin P = 0.02) but fewer treatment courses (P = 0.008) as compared to the treated patients in group II. Haematological tolerance was reduced when chemotherapy succeeded to exclusive irradiation. Breast conservation was identical for both groups at the end of primary treatment (82 and 77% for groups I and II, respectively). Of the 191 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant treatment arm, 65% had an objective response (> 50% regression) following four cycles of chemotherapy. The objective response rate to primary irradiation (55 Gy) was 85%. Improved survival figures in the neoadjuvant treatment arm could be the result of the early initiation of chemotherapy, but we cannot exclude that this difference might be attributable to a slightly more aggressive treatment. So far, the trend in favour of decreased metastases was not statistically significant. The local control appeared similar in both subgroups.

Risk factors and management of local recurrence following breast conservation surgery

Although a number of histologic and treatment factors that individually and in combination predict for an increased risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery can be identified, none so obviously compromises survival that breast conservation is contraindicated because that risk factor is present. In-breast recurrence is associated with the risk of any disease remaining after lumpectomy if the breast is not irradiated and the risk of large amounts of residual disease if irradiation is used. Some risk factors appear to predict for both local recurrence and distant recurrence, whereas others predict an increased risk of local recurrence but appear to have little effect on the risk of metastatic disease. Overall, the relation between in-breast recurrence and the risk of systemic metastases is poorly understood. Furthermore, the efficacy of chemotherapy in decreasing the risk of systemic metastases after in-breast recurrence has not been evaluated. Mastectomy is the treatment of choice for in-breast recurrence after breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy. A few patients are candidates for a second attempt at breast conservation.

Age as a prognostic factor for breast and regional nodal recurrence following breast conserving surgery and irradiation in stage I and II breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between age and breast/regional nodal relapse following breast conserving surgery and irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The results of treatment in 511 patients with 519 Stage I and II breast cancers treated at Mallinkrodt Institute of Radiology and affiliated hospitals between 1958 and 1988 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy women, of whom 96% had axillary dissections, were 39 years of age or younger. These young patients were more likely to have chemotherapy (p < 0.0001), and tumor bed reexcision (p < 0.01), and less likely to have an undissected axilla (p < 0.01), or estrogen receptor positive tumor (p = 0.02) than the older women (> 40 years). Although breast recurrence tended to appear earlier in the younger patients (12% at 5 years for those < 40 years vs. 6% at 5 years for those older), by 7 years the breast failure rate for the two groups was the same (12%), p = 0.13. In the 37 women 35 years of age or younger, the actuarial rate of breast recurrence was 9% at 7 years. Compared to other series in the literature, in which cancers were grossly excised without regard to the microscopic margins of resection, and reexcision was not routinely performed, young women treated with breast conserving surgery and irradiation at our institution frequently underwent reexcision of the tumor bed (57%), and had negative pathologic margins of resection (75%). Regional nodal relapse was in general uncommon, and not seen with increased frequency in the youngest cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our experience suggests that young age is not a contraindication to breast conserving surgery and irradiation. Although breast cancers in this cohort may have certain features rendering them prone to local failure, we believe this risk can be mitigated by appropriate patient selection and optimal surgical resection.