Results of radiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Safety and Feasibility of Radiotherapy Plus Camrelizumab for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

LESSONS LEARNED

Radiotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody as first-line therapy is safe and feasible in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Tumor-infiltrating and peripheral lymphocytes were associated with patient survival. Further studies combining chemoradiotherapy with immunotherapy in locally advanced ESCC and exploration of predictive biomarkers are warranted.

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase Ib study of radiotherapy plus programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody camrelizumab as first-line treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We planned to enroll 20 patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced ESCC. Patients received 60 Gy radiation (2.0 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week), with camrelizumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) starting with radiotherapy and continuing for 32 weeks (i.e., for 16 cycles). The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility. Secondary endpoints were rates of radiologic and pathologic response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Study data were collected by the week during radiotherapy (RT), every month during the maintenance camrelizumab treatment, and every 3 months after treatment. Tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood were monitored at baseline and after 40 Gy radiation for association with efficacy.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled and received treatment. One patient (patient 10) was excluded upon discovery of a second tumor in the bladder during treatment, leaving 19 patients for analysis. Toxicity was deemed tolerable. Fourteen (74%) patients had assessed objective response. At a median follow-up time of 31.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0-35.1), median OS and PFS times were 16.7 months (95% CI, 5.9-27.9) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 0-30.3), respectively. OS and PFS rates at 24 months were 31.6% and 35.5%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed associations between the following factors and OS/PFS: tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, PD-1⁺ CD8⁺ , PD-1⁺ CD4⁺ T cells, and PD-L1⁺ CD4⁺ T cells; peripheral blood CD4⁺ , CD8⁺ , CD4⁺ regulatory T cells, and their subsets.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy plus camrelizumab had manageable toxicity and antitumor efficacy for locally advanced ESCC. Several biomarkers were associated with clinical benefit and deserve further study.

Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours' consensus guidelines for the management of oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer is among the ten most common types of cancer worldwide. More than 80% of the cases and deaths related to the disease occur in developing countries. Local socio-economic, epidemiologic and healthcare particularities led us to create a Brazilian guideline for the management of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) carcinomas. The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours invited 50 physicians with different backgrounds, including radiology, pathology, endoscopy, nuclear medicine, genetics, oncological surgery, radiotherapy and clinical oncology, to collaborate. This document was prepared based on an extensive review of topics related to heredity, diagnosis, staging, pathology, endoscopy, surgery, radiation, systemic therapy (including checkpoint inhibitors) and follow-up, which was followed by presentation, discussion and voting by the panel members. It provides updated evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical management of oesophageal and OGJ carcinomas in several scenarios and clinical settings.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging and Multimodal Therapy of Esophageal and Gastric Tumors

Gastric and esophageal tumors are diverse neoplasms that involve mucosal and submucosal tissue layers and include squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, spindle cell neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors, marginal B cell lymphomas, along with less common tumors. The worldwide burden of esophageal and gastric malignancies is significant, with esophageal and gastric cancer representing the ninth and fifth most common cancers, respectively. The approach to diagnosis and staging of these lesions is multimodal and includes a combination of gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and cross-sectional imaging. Likewise, therapy is multidisciplinary and combines therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapeutic tools. Future directions for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric malignancies are evolving rapidly and will involve advances in endoscopic and endosonographic techniques including tethered capsules, optical coherence tomography, along with targeted cytologic and serological analyses.

Clinical Evaluation of Javanica Oil Emulsion Injection Combined with the Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of Javanica oil emulsion injection (JOEI) combined with the radiotherapy (RT) for treating esophageal cancer (EC). Design: A literature search was conducted for collecting the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on EC treated by JOEI in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, the China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and the Wanfang Database from inception to February 4, 2017. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, and objective remission rate, performance status, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 1-year survival rate, and 2-year survival rate were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 13.0 software. Results: A total of 11 RCTs with 909 participants were involved in this meta-analysis. The results showed that in comparison with RT alone, the JOEI combined with RT was associated with the better effects on improving objective remission rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI 1.17-1.52], Z = 4.44, p < 0.00001), performance status (RR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.25-1.85], Z = 4.24, p < 0.00001), 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [1.17-1.60], Z = 3.86, p < 0.0001), and 2-year survival rate (RR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.09-1.70], Z = 2.68, p = 0.007). The differences between the two groups in objective remission rate, performance status, 1-year survival rate, and 2-year survival rate were statistically significant. Besides, the JOEI combined with RT could reduce the incidence of ADRs. Specifically, the statistically significant difference was detected between these two groups about leukopenia (RR = 0.39, 95% CI [0.25-0.61], Z = 4.19, p < 0.0001), radiation esophagitis (RR = 0.68, 95% CI [0.50-0.93], Z = 2.42, p = 0.02), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.12-0.66], Z = 2.95, p = 0.003), and hemoglobin reduction (RR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.35-0.79], Z = 3.14, p = 0.002); however, there was no statistically significant difference for the outcome of nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.36-1.03], Z = 1.85, p = 0.06) between two groups. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicated that the combination of JOEI and RT was associated with the more beneficial treatment for patients with EC compared with only receiving RT. However, more well-designed and multicenter RCTs should be carried out to confirm this finding because of the limitations of enrolled 11 RCTs.

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy alone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year survival outcomes

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We conducted a phase II study to explore the effect of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-DCRT) alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. This study aimed to analyze the long-term survival outcomes.

METHODS

Between November 2004 and April 2007, 30 patients with thoracic esophageal SCC underwent late-course sequential boost 3-DCRT at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The planning target volume (PTV1) comprised a 1.2-1.5 cm lateral margin around the gross tumor volume and a 3.0 cm margin, superior and inferior to the gross tumor volume. PTV2 encompassed the gross tumor volume with a margin of 0.5-0.7 cm. The PTV1 dose delivered was 50 Gy, and the PTV2 dose was a boost dose of 16 Gy, resulting in a total dose of 66 Gy. No chemotherapy was administered.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 30 months for all patients, and 132 months for patients who were alive. The median overall survival was 27 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.9-35.0). The 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 56.6%, 33.3%, and 26.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 14 months (95% CI 7.7-20.2 months), and the 2-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 33.3%, 30.0%, and 26.6%, respectively. No severe late toxicity was observed in long-term survivors.

CONCLUSION

Late-course sequential boost 3-DCRT is safe and feasible with promising long-term outcomes for esophageal SCC.

Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

The treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer is controversial. For patients who are candidates for surgical resection, multiple prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the advantages of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. For patients who are medically inoperable, definitive chemoradiation is an alternative approach with survival rates comparable to trimodality therapy. Although trials of dose escalation are ongoing, the standard radiation dose remains 50.4 Gy. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as image-guided radiation therapy with motion management and intensity-modulated radiation therapy are strongly encouraged with a planning objective to maximize conformity to the intended target volume while reducing dose delivered to uninvolved normal tissues.

A comparative study of target volumes based on 18F-FDG PET-CT and ten phases of 4DCT for primary thoracic squamous esophageal cancer

Purpose

To investigate the correlations in target volumes based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and four-dimensional CT (4DCT) to detect the feasibility of implementing PET in determining gross target volumes (GTV) for tumor motion for primary thoracic esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

Thirty-three patients with EC sequentially underwent contrast-enhanced 3DCT, 4DCT, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT thoracic simulation. The internal gross target volume (IGTV)₁₀ was obtained by combining the GTV from ten phases of 4DCT. The GTVs based on PET/CT images were defined by setting of different standardized uptake value thresholds and visual contouring. The difference in volume ratio, conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI) between IGTV₁₀ and GTV_PET was compared.

Results

The images from 20 patients were suitable for further analysis. The optimal volume ratio of 0.95±0.32, 1.06±0.50, 1.07±0.49 was at standardized uptake value (SUV)_2.5, SUV_20%, or manual contouring. The mean CIs were from 0.33 to 0.54. The best CIs were at SUV_2.0 (0.51±0.11), SUV_2.5 (0.53±0.13), SUV_20% (0.53±0.12), and manual contouring (0.54±0.14). The mean DIs of GTV_PET in IGTV₁₀ were from 0.60 to 0.90, and the mean DIs of IGTV₁₀ in GTV_PET ranged from 0.35 to 0.78. A negative correlation was found between the mean CI and different SUV (P=0.000).

Conclusion

None of the PET-based contours had both close spatial and volumetric approximation to the 4DCT IGTV₁₀. Further evaluation and optimization of PET as a tool for target identification are required.

High-dose radiation therapy alone by moderate hypofractionation for patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

We conducted retrospective analyses to investigate the clinical outcome of thoracic esophageal cancer patients who were treated with high-dose radiation therapy (RT) alone by moderate hypofractionation due to medical unfitness or refusal to receive either surgery or chemo-radiotherapy.Between May 2003 and April 2013, 70 patients were treated with high-dose RT alone with curative aim. The planned total RT dose was 60 Gy in daily 3.0 Gy per fraction. We evaluated the survival outcome, toxicities, and prognostic factors affecting patients' survival.At the time of analysis, 32 patients experienced disease progression. The 2-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and local control (LC) rates were 52.1%, 57.8%, and 68.2%, respectively. Among them, 25 patients had superficial (cT1a-b) esophageal cancers, and the 2-year OS, CSS, and LC rates were 80.0%, 87.3%, and 81.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that cT disease (P < 0.001) and tumor location (P = 0.022) were the significant factors for OS. The incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicities were 9.9%, including grade 3 esophagitis (2 patients, 2.8%) and grade 4 or 5 trachea-esophageal fistula (5 patients, 7.1%).High-dose RT alone by moderate hypofractionation had led to reasonable clinical outcomes at acceptable toxicity risk in thoracic esophageal cancer patients who are medically unfit or refuse surgery or chemotherapy, especially for the patients having superficial lesion.

Preliminary treatment results of proton beam therapy with chemoradiotherapy for stage I-III esophageal cancer

The effect of proton beam therapy (PBT) on various cancers is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PBT with alternating chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) for patients with stage I–III esophageal cancer. Two cycles of systemic chemotherapy with a continuous infusion of 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) on days 1–5 and a 5h infusion of nedaplatin (NDP) on day 6 were accompanied by thoracic irradiation using X‐ray therapy and PBT. During the first half of the treatment, X‐rays were delivered to the prophylactic area. During the second half of the treatment, proton beams were used to irradiate the involved field. To reduce the dose of cardiac irradiation, proton beams were delivered with posterior and posterior oblique angles. Between January 2009 and December 2012, 47 patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow‐up duration was 29 months for all patients and 40 months for survivors. The 3 year overall survival rate, progression‐free survival rate, and local control rate were 59.2%, 56.3%, and 69.8%, respectively. With respect to grade 3–4 late toxicities, there were no pleural or pericardial effusions, but two patients (4.3%) had esophageal stenosis, one patient (2.1%) had fistula, and two patients (4.3%) developed radiation pneumonitis. PBT with ACRT might have the potential to reduce the risk of cardiac damage and might become one of the primary methods of esophageal cancer treatment.

Multimodality therapy for cancers of the esophagus and gastric cardia

The role of multimodal treatment in the management of esophageal cancer is controversial. There are conflicting results from studies on the effect of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment on long-term survival. Following a search of the Medline database, the authors examine the results of randomized studies on the various treatment protocols available and discuss future therapeutic improvements.

Explore the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume delineation for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the pattern of lymphatic metastases

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal carcinoma is characterized by a high frequency of lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is difficult to accurately define the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), because the LNM rate and the included node level varied greatly among previous studies. This study aimed to determine which node level should be included for radiotherapy by analyzing LNM rate in thoracic ESCC patients.

METHODS

The clinicopathological factors related to LNM were analyzed using the χ test. The sites with LNM rate higher than 15%, an empirical cutoff value, were considered as high-risk areas and were included in clinical target volume of thoracic ESCC patients for radiotherapy.

RESULTS

This study included 1893 thoracic ESCC patients treated at Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China. The rates of LNM in patients with upper thoracic tumors were 14.6% cervical, 29.3% upper mediastinal, 8.5% middle mediastinal, 9.8% lower mediastinal, and 7.3% abdominal, respectively. The rates of LNM in patients with middle thoracic tumors were 4.3%, 5.0%, 32.9%, 2.5%, and 14.9%, respectively. The rates of LNM in patients with lower thoracic tumors were 2%, 2.2% 15.4%, 38.1%, and 27.5%, respectively. Independent prognostic factors for LNM included length of tumor, histologic differentiation, and depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiation of the selective regional lymph node and the correlated lymphatic drainage regions should be performed according to the clinicopathological factors. For the large, deeply invasive longer tumors and poorly differentiated thoracic ESCC, the irradiation field should be enlarged appropriately.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Radiation therapy may be combined with chemotherapy, used as a component of induction therapy, used in the adjuvant setting, or used for palliation of advanced disease. Chemotherapy is also occasionally used as a solitary treatment modality for patients with esophageal cancer. Current treatment protocols include multiple agents, and agents directed against specific molecular targets have been investigated in clinical trials. This article discusses future directions related to the selection of radiation treatment protocols, novel targeted chemotherapeutic agents, and the selection of patients for surgery.

Esophageal carcinoma advances in treatment results for locally advanced disease: review

The treatment results of patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinomas have evolved since the publication of the first trial of concurrent mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil with radiotherapy (RT) in 1983. Subsequent studies refined and improved on the concurrent chemotherapy (chemo) with administration of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil infusion (PF). Chemo (PF) before surgery improved overall survival (OS) in those patients in most of the randomized trials and in meta-analyses. Two courses of PF concurrent with irradiation followed by additional two courses of PF were superior to RT alone without surgery for both groups. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was found to have statistically improved OS as compared with surgery only in randomized trials and meta-analyses. In most of these studies, it was found that those patients with pathologic complete response to the initial treatment(s) did better than those who had no improvement at all. Current treatment outcome for these diseases is disappointing; newer strategies including induction chemo with the optimal combination, proper dosage of each drug, and proper number of courses before concurrent chemoradiotherapy; improvement in RT; and immunotherapy with or without subsequent surgery are exciting and definitely need to be investigated in prospective randomized trial(s).

Primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in non-metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of radio(chemo)therapy in the curative management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We retrospectively analyzed 163 patients with T1-T4, N0-1, M0 ESCC who were treated between January 1988 and December 2006 at the Technische Universität München. One hundred sixty patients were inoperable due to a poor performance status, comorbidities or locally advanced unresectable disease. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) was performed with (n= 146) or without (n= 17) systemic chemotherapy. Fifty-four patients received an additional boost with intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT). Surviving patients were followed for a median of 72 months (range 10-173 months). The estimated overall survival (OS) at 2 and 5 years was 27 ± 4% and 11 ± 3%, respectively. Loco-regional recurrence at the primary site was observed in 29% of patients (n= 47). The recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 2 and 5 years was 24 ± 3% and 9 ± 2%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the ECOG performance status (P= 0.004), 3D conformal (vs conventional) radiotherapy (P= 0.031) and continuous standard fractionation (vs split-course radiotherapy, P= 0.048) were associated with a better OS. Simultaneous chemotherapy (P= 0.49) or IBT (P= 0.31) had no significant impact on survival. Outcome for patients with ESCC is poor. Despite the very unfavorable patient selection (poor performance status, high rate of comorbidities, and advanced disease), long-term survival with radio(chemo)therapy was achieved in about 10% of patients. The introduction of modern treatment techniques/modalities (3D conformal planning/ continuous standard fractionation) might be associated with better outcomes.

The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on airway colonization and postoperative respiratory complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer

Respiratory complication is one of the important postoperative complications of oesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery is effective for postoperative respiratory complications. In this study, patients with oesophageal cancer were divided into two group: one with neoadjuvant therapy and the other without neoadjuvant therapy. Before surgery, they all underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage. We evaluated respiratory complications and the effects of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. Forty patients (M/F = 23/17 and mean age 61 years) were enrolled in this study. Twenty-two cases had cancer in the middle part and 18 in the lower part of the oesophagus. Significant correlation was observed between the number of positive micro-organism and difficulty in weaning and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. But no significant correlation was found between neoadjuvant therapy and respiratory complications.

Update: modern approaches to the treatment of localized esophageal cancer

The optimal treatment strategy for esophageal cancer continues to be a topic of debate. Improvements in chemotherapy drugs, surgical techniques, and radiotherapy planning and delivery have led to the design of treatment approaches that are specific to both the stage of the tumor and the overall performance status of the patient. Surgery continues to be the standard treatment option for localized disease, but multimodality treatments that include radiation and chemotherapy with surgery are increasingly used. The next few years will continue to see improvements in radiation techniques, especially proton beam treatment; the development of additional minimally invasive surgical approaches to minimize postoperative side effects; and the discovery of molecular biomarkers to help specifically target treatment of esophageal cancer in individual patients.

Comparison of chemoradiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma

Despite the wide use of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma, there is little evidence that CRT improves the survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the outcome of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma treated by CRT and RT alone. Patients were treated at the Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center (Ota, Japan) and the Gunma University Hospital (Maebashi, Japan). Patients provided written informed consent before treatment. Patients with distant metastases were excluded. CRT consisting of RT, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil has been performed since 2002 when patients have adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Between November 1993 and April 2006, 8 patients were treated by CRT and 12 were RT alone. The median follow-up period of surviving patients was 19 months. CRT group had a significantly higher complete response rate than those RT alone group (87% vs. 33%, P = 0.05). Of all patients, 2-year overall survival rate was 41% and the median survival time was 18 months. The 2-year overall survival of patients treated by CRT was 58%, significantly better than 24% of those with RT alone (P = 0.02). CRT can improve outcomes of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with RT alone.

Does pre-operative estimation of oesophageal tumour metabolic length using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images compare with surgical pathology length?

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to compare the pre-operative metabolic tumour length on FDG PET/CT with the resected pathological specimen in patients with oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with oesophageal carcinoma who had undergone staging PET/CT imaging between the period of June 2002 and May 2008 who were then suitable for curative surgery, either with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, were included in this study. Metabolic tumour length was assessed using both visual analysis and a maximum standardised uptake value (SUV(max)) cutoff of 2.5.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients proceeded directly to curative surgical resection, whereas 48 patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by curative surgery. The 95% limits of agreement in the surgical arm were more accurate when the metabolic tumour length was visually assessed with a mean difference of -0.05 cm (SD 2.16 cm) compared to a mean difference of +2.42 cm (SD 3.46 cm) when assessed with an SUV(max) cutoff of 2.5. In the neo-adjuvant group, the 95% limits of agreement were once again more accurate when assessed visually with a mean difference of -0.6 cm (SD 1.84 cm) compared to a mean difference of +1.58 cm (SD 3.1 cm) when assessed with an SUV(max) cutoff of 2.5.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high accuracy of PET/CT in measuring gross target volume (GTV) length. A visual method for GTV length measurement was demonstrated to be superior and more accurate than when using an SUV(max) cutoff of 2.5. This has the potential of reducing the planning target volume with dose escalation to the tumour with a corresponding reduction in normal tissue complication probability.

Prognosis of esophageal cancer patients with pathologic complete response after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

To define failure patterns and predictive factors in esophageal cancer patients who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PCRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 61 esophageal cancer patients who were enrolled in prospective studies and showed pCR after PCRT. All of the patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Of the patients, 40 were treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy (4,560 cGy in 28 fractions) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (FP), and 21 patients received conventional fractionation radiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin (XP).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 45.2 months (range, 6.5-162.3 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates (DFS) were 60.2% and 80.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, age and lymph node (LN) metastasis were poor prognostic factors for OS, and pretreatment weight loss (>2 kg) was a poor prognostic factor for DFS. In multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis and pretreatment weight loss were independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS. Nine patients (15%) had disease recurrence. Of the nine patients, 5 patients had locoregional failure, 1 patients had distant metastasis, and 3 patients had distant and locoregional failure. In-field failure occurred in 5 patients; out-of-field failure occurred in 1 patient; both in-field and out-of-field failure occurred in 2 patients; and both marginal and out-of-field failure occurred in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in pCR patients, the most common failure site was within the radiation field, which suggests that more efficient local treatment is needed. Tumor recurrence was more common in patients with older age and with pretreatment weight loss.

Dose-volume histogram parameters and clinical factors associated with pleural effusion after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the dose-volume histogram parameters and clinical factors as predictors of pleural effusion in esophageal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-three esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive CRT from January 2001 to March 2007 were reviewed retrospectively on the basis of the following criteria: pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer, available computed tomography scan for treatment planning, 6-month follow-up after CRT, and radiation dose ≥ 50 Gy. Exclusion criteria were lung metastasis, malignant pleural effusion, and surgery. Mean heart dose, mean total lung dose, and percentages of heart or total lung volume receiving ≥ 10-60 Gy (Heart-V(10) to V(60) and Lung-V(10) to V(60), respectively) were analyzed in relation to pleural effusion.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 26.9 months (range, 6.7-70.2) after CRT. Of the 43 patients, 15 (35%) developed pleural effusion. By univariate analysis, mean heart dose, Heart-V(10) to V(60), and Lung-V(50) to V(60) were significantly associated with pleural effusion. Poor performance status, primary tumor of the distal esophagus, and age ≥ 65 years were significantly related with pleural effusion. Multivariate analysis identified Heart-V(50) as the strongest predictive factor for pleural effusion (p = 0.01). Patients with Heart-V(50) <20%, 20%≤ Heart-V(50) <40%, and Heart-V(50) ≥ 40% had 6%, 44%, and 64% of pleural effusion, respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Heart-V(50) is a useful parameter for assessing the risk of pleural effusion and should be reduced to avoid pleural effusion.

Multidisciplinary approach to esophageal and gastric cancer

The incidence of esophageal and gastric malignancies has increased over the last decade. Historically, surgery has been considered the best treatment for these cancers. However, long-term survival after surgery is fair at best, because of the tendency of disease to recur locally and distantly. Presently, the management of these cancers involves surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. This article discusses various treatment strategies that employ these modalities either alone or in combination, in an attempt to improve survival rates for patients who have gastroesophageal malignancies.

Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are some reports indicating that prophylactic three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer can lead to improved survival. But the benefit of ENI in CRT for thoracic esophageal cancer remains controversial. The purpose of the present study is to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for thoracic esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the thoracic esophagus newly diagnosed between February 1999 and April 2001 in our institution was recruited from our database. Definitive chemoradiotherapy consisted of two cycles of cisplatin/5FU repeated every 5 weeks, with concurrent radiation therapy of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Up to 40 Gy radiation therapy was delivered to the cervical, periesophageal, mediastinal and perigastric lymph nodes as ENI.

RESULTS

One hundred two patients were included in this analysis, and their characteristics were as follows: median age, 65 years; male/female, 85/17; T1/T2/T3/T4, 16/11/61/14; N0/N1, 48/54; M0/M1, 84/18. The median follow-up period for the surviving patients was 41 months. Sixty patients achieved complete response (CR). After achieving CR, only one (1.0%; 95% CI, 0-5.3%) patient experienced elective nodal failure without any other site of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In CRT for esophageal SCC, ENI is effective for preventing regional nodal failure. Further evaluation of whether ENI leads to an improved overall survival is needed.

Retrospective study of photodynamic therapy for upper gastrointestinal cancers during past 25 years in China

AIM: To find out the status of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for upper gastrointestinal cancers, and then discuss how to solve the problems that hinder the development of PDT.

METHODS: A total of 30 pertinent literatures about PDT for upper gastrointestinal cancers during past 25 years were collected through the retrieval of several related medical databases (Chinese Medical Current Contents, China BioMedical Bibliographic Database, China Journal Fulltext Database). The data, including the gender, age of patients, tumor position, pathologic findings, treatment efficacy, adverse effects and the applied laser and photosensitizer, were statistical analyzed.

RESULTS: For all the 1687 cases with upper gastrointestinal cancers, the excellently-effective rate (complete remission or prominent remission) and effective rate (complete remission or prominent remission or minor remission) were 53.2% and 87%, respectively. The therapeutic effect of combined treatment (PDT with other methods) was superior to that of PDT (u = 4.456, P < 0.01). All the involved pathological types were sensitive to PDT. Different photosensitizers and lasers were used by different authors, but all of them were effective without any serious side effect.

CONCLUSION: PDT shows a radical effect on the tumors of early stage and a favorable palliative effect on the tumors of advanced stage, so it is one of the optional strategies for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Radiation therapy for gastrointestinal cancer

This article has reviewed the current role of radiation in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies and discussed the data supporting its use. Radiation treatment in this setting continues to evolve with the increasing implementation of more conformal delivery techniques. Further scientific investigation is needed to establish the optimal role of radiation and to better define its integration with novel systemic and biologic modalities.

Stent placement or brachytherapy for palliation of dysphagia from esophageal cancer: a prognostic model to guide treatment selection

BACKGROUND

Brachytherapy was found to be preferable to metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia because of inoperable esophageal cancer in the randomized SIREC trial. The benefit of brachytherapy, however, only occurred after a relatively long survival. The objective is to develop a model that distinguishes patients with a poor prognosis from those with a relatively good prognosis.

METHODS

Survival was analyzed with Cox regression analysis. Dysphagia-adjusted survival (alive with no or mild dysphagia) was studied with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patient data is from the multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (SIREC, n = 209) and a consecutive series (n = 396). Patients received a stent or single-dose brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic factors for survival included tumor length, World Health Organization performance score, and the presence of metastases (multivariable p < 0.001). A simple score, which also included age and gender, could satisfactorily separate patients with a poor, intermediate, and relatively good prognosis within the SIREC trial. For the poor prognosis group, the difference in dysphagia-adjusted survival was 23 days in favor of stent placement compared with brachytherapy (77 vs. 54 days, p = 0.16). For the other prognostic groups, brachytherapy resulted in a better dysphagia-adjusted survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple prognostic score may help to identify patients with a poor prognosis in whom stent placement is at least equivalent to brachytherapy. If further validated, this score can provide an evidence-based tool for the selection of palliative treatment in esophageal cancer patients.

Multiple Management Modalities in Esophageal Cancer: Combined Modality Management Approaches

The overall success rate nationally in treating esophageal carcinomas remains poor, with over 90% of patients succumbing to the disease. In part I of this two-part series, we explored epidemiology, presentation and progression, work-up, and surgical approaches. In part II, we explore the promising suggestions of integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy into the multimodal management of esophageal cancers. Alternative approaches to resection alone have been sought because of the overall poor survival rates of esophageal cancer patients, with failures occurring both local-regionally and distantly. Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (XRT) have been shown, by randomized trial, to be more effective than XRT alone in treating unresectable esophageal cancers and also have shown promise as a neoadjuvant treatment when combined with surgery in the multimodal treatment of this disease. Various studies have also addressed issues such as preoperative chemotherapy, radiation dose escalation, chemotherapy/XRT as a definitive treatment versus use as a surgical adjuvant, and alternative chemotherapy regimens. There are suggestions of some progress, but this remains a difficult problem area in which management is continuing to evolve.

Long-term toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients newly diagnosed with SCC of the esophagus and treated with definitive CRT between 1992 and 1999 in our institution were recruited from our database on the basis of the following criteria: age </= 75 years, performance status (PS; based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) 0 to 2, and clinical tumor-node-metastasis system stage I to IVA. The CRT consisted of two cycles of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and continuous infusion of fluorouracil 400 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12, repeated every 5 weeks with concurrent radiotherapy of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. For the assessment of toxicity, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer late radiation morbidity scoring scheme was adopted.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were recruited, and their characteristics were as follows: median age, 62 years (range, 38 to 75 years); 121 males and 18 females; 96 patients PS 0, 42 patients PS 1, and one patient PS 2; 15 patients T1, 11 patients T2, 60 patients T3, and 53 patients T4; and 101 patients M0, 38 patients M1a. With a median follow-up of 53 months, the median survival time and 5-year survival rate were 21 months and 29%, respectively. Of 78 patients with complete remission, two patients died as a result of acute myocardial infarction. Grade 2, 3, and 4 late toxicities occurred with the following incidences: pericarditis in eight patients, seven patients, and one patient, respectively; heart failure in zero, zero, and two patients; pleural effusion in seven, eight, and zero patients; and radiation pneumonitis in one patient, three patients, and zero patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Definitive CRT for SCC of the esophagus is effective with substantial toxicities. Additional investigation to minimize the normal tissue toxicities is warranted.

Radiation therapy combined with cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (Nedaplatin) and 5-fluorouracil for untreated and recurrent esophageal cancer

From January 1999 to November 2000, a total of 24 esophageal cancer patients (17 untreated and 7 recurrent cases) were treated with radiation therapy (60-70 Gy) combined with cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (Nedaplatin) (80-120 mg/body) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (500-1,000 mg/body/24 h, continuous infusion for 5 days). Grade III leukocytopenia was observed in 6 (25%) of the patients. Grade III and IV thrombocytopenia was observed in one patient each. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates for definitively irradiated patients were 59% and 39%, respectively, and for patients with postoperative recurrence 69% and 69%, respectively. High-dose radiation combined with Nedaplatin and 5-FU is a safe and effective method for treating esophageal cancer.

p53 gene therapy for esophageal cancer

Despite improvement of surgical treatment and application of multimodality therapies to advanced esophageal cancer, the prognosis is extremely poor for patients with unresectable tumors. Based on the genetic background of esophageal cancer, we have developed various gene therapy strategies against human esophageal cancer. In this article, we review molecular events of esophageal cancer and p53 gene therapy approaches for its treatment. First, we analyzed p53 genetic alterations and angiogenesis in esophageal cancer. Second, we tested a p53 recombinant adenoviral vector (Ad5CMV-p53). Significant growth suppression was observed following infection with Ad5CMV-p53 in human esophageal cancer cell lines. This observation suggests that Ad5CMV-p53 may be a potentially effective therapeutic agent for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Promising avenues for investigation include double gene therapy and adjuvant use of gene therapy with radiation therapy. Third, based on recent reports of clinical trials of p53 gene therapy for lung cancer and head and neck cancer, we developed a clinical protocol for p53 gene therapy for unresectable advanced esophageal cancer. This clinical trial was planned to evaluate vector tolerability and efficacy. Up to December 1, 2001, four patients were enrolled in this phase I/II trial. No serious adverse events related to Ad5CMV-p53 have occurred so far in these patients, and the trial has been safely conducted.

Endoluminal palliation for dysphagia secondary to esophageal carcinoma

There are now a variety of treatment options available to palliate dysphagia in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma. The decision as to which therapy to recommend for a patient should be based on a though understanding of the therapies and must be individualized for each patient and on the experience of the endoscopist or surgeon. In addition, consideration should be given as to resource availability at a particular institution. External beam radiation currently has little role as primary treatment for dysphagia. Brachytherapy is labor intensive; requires 2 to 3 weekly treatments, highly specialized radiation equipment, and an experienced radiation oncologist; and is therefore limited to tertiary care centers. Endoluminal YAG-laser tumor ablation is feasible at many institutions and provides immediate dysphagia relief but has limited durability (weeks) if not followed by adjuvant therapy, and requires an endoscopist with significant laser experience. PDT is relatively easy to perform and has a lower perforation rate and longer durability than YAG laser therapy but it is relatively costly and less patient friendly due to the morbidity of its attendant 6 weeks of photosensitivity. Advances in stent technology have rendered this a safe, readily available treatment for the palliation of dysphagia. Palliation of dysphagia is an important but difficult goal that may require creative use of a variety of endoscopic interventions, either in combination or serially. Ideally, physicians who palliate dysphagia secondary to esophageal cancer should be facile in both endoscopic ablative and stenting techniques and have a close working relationship with both radiation and medical oncologists.

Phase II trial of continuous infusion carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy for localized cancer of the esophagus

The aim of this study was to determine the toxicity, response rate, failure-free survival, and overall survival in a treatment program comprising continuous infusion carboplatin, short in-fusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. To be eligible, patients were required to have Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 60, adequate organ function, and have received no prior therapy. Planned radiation dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. 5-FU was to be administered commencing days 1 and 29 of radiotherapy, and given at a dose of 1 g/m2/d for 4 days as a continuous infusion. Carboplatin was to commence on day 1 of radiotherapy and be given throughout the period of radiation as a continuous infusion. The starting dose of carboplatin was 28 mg/m2/d. The protocol specified a 25% dose reduction of carboplatin if more than two of the first six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was defined as grade IV neutropenia lasting more than 7 days, grade IV thrombocytopenia, or any grade IV nonhematologic toxicity. All 23 patients in the study received protocol radio-therapy, except one who was given an extra 10 Gy. Seven patients received carboplatin at 28 mg/m2/d and 16 received 21 mg/m2/d. Hematologic DLTs were experienced by all of the seven patients receiving the higher dose. No patients in the low-dose group experienced hematologic DLTs, and only 2 of 16 ceased chemotherapy early because of myelosuppression. Three patients in the low-dose group experienced grade IV esophagitis but were able to complete protocol radiotherapy. Apart from esophagitis, nonhematologic toxicity was generally moderate or mild. Six patients had thrombosis complicating the central venous catheters. Endoscopy was performed in 21 patients (91%), with an overall complete response rate of 65% (CI: 43-84%) for the whole group or 71% (CI: 48-89%) for the endoscopically evaluated group. Estimated median failure-free survival time was 8.9 months (CI: 7.1-12.9), and estimated median overall survival time was 21.4 months (CI: 9.6 -35.4). Carboplatin at 21 mg/m2/d as a continuous infusion may be given safely in combination with short infusional 5-FU and radiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the esophagus. This combination has resulted in response data comparable to that of larger studies of cisplatin-containing regimens and warrants further study, ideally in a phase III randomized controlled trial.

Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

The incidence rate of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is increasing in association with the epidemiologic rise in distal esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cardial (AEG type III) tumors. The overall survival rate is poor in most patients with AEG because lymph node or visceral metastases are frequently present at the time patients become symptomatic. A few patients are identified early in the disease because of screening for gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus. Early stage AEG (T1N0 or T2NO, carcinoma in situ, or severe dysplasia ) can in many instances be cured with surgery alone. Ablative treatments for early stage AEG, including endoscopic fulguration by cautery and laser or photodynamic therapy, are investigational at this time. Locoregionally advanced AEG (T3, T4, N1, or M1a ) without distant systemic metastases (M1b) has a poor overall survival rate with surgery alone or definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy without surgery. Analysis of the use of multimodality treatment strategies for locoregionally advanced AEG types I and II have demonstrated improved survival rates in two small phase III trials with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. In contrast, three small phase III trials with preoperative concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy in patients with predominantly squamous cell carcinoma did not demonstrate any clear survival advantage. Additionally, a randomized phase III study evaluating preoperative chemotherapy without radiation therapy in esophageal cancer (predominantly adenocarcinoma) has demonstrated no survival benefit. In light of these results, additional large randomized phase III studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. At the present time, preoperative chemoradiotherapy remains investigational. For locoregionally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, including AEG type III, postoperative concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival as demonstrated in a recently completed random assignment trial (INT 0116). As a result, surgery with postoperative chemoradiotherapy has recently become the standard of care for patients with AJCC stage II and III gastric adenocarcinoma (including patients with AEG type III). Metastatic AEG (M1b) should be treated with palliative chemotherapy (in good performance patients) or supportive care (poor performance) in asymptomatic patients. Radiation therapy and endoscopic stent placement (expandable wire mesh) can be used to palliate dysphagia in patients with M1b disease. The development of expandable stents and improved radiotherapy has obviated surgical bypass to palliate patients with symptomatic, metastatic AEG.

Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in carcinoma of the esophagus

Esophageal carcinoma remains a highly lethal disease that has shown a recent profound increase in prevalence and an equally dramatic epidemiologic shift. There is a well recognized causal association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, and the molecular events underlying this progression from mucosal injury, to metaplasia, to dysplasia, to carcinoma are now becoming clear. Current diagnostic modalities and preoperative staging systems all have significant limitations. Fortunately, chemoprevention strategies and the identification of clinically useful molecular biomarkers that may be used to stage disease and select appropriate therapy are on the horizon. The extent of surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma remains an area of great controversy. Disease that is confined to the mucosa is being diagnosed more commonly, and endoscopic ablative techniques have been proposed. To date, however, preoperative discrimination of tumor depth and presence of regional nodal metastases remains inadequate in these very early lesions, and caution is urged before adopting therapies that may compromise cure. For disease penetrating the mucosa, the extent of surgical therapy must be tailored by the objectives of treatment (cure vs palliation) and preoperative stage. Surgical resection is the current standard of care, with combined-modality therapy reserved for prohibitive surgical candidates. No clear survival benefit has been documented for neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. The results of preoperative combined-modality therapy, including three prospective, randomized trials, are encouraging but to date have not shown a definite benefit.

Improvement of oral ingestion in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and insertion of a self-expanding nitinol stent

Radiotherapy, chemotherapy and self-expanding nitinol stent insertion were performed in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer to improve oral ingestion. Twelve patients underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A stent was inserted in patients with dysphagia after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients' capacity for oral ingestion was classified into three categories: grade I patients were able to ingest enough food; grade II patients could ingest food but required nutritional support; and grade II patients found it impossible to ingest anything. After radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the number of grade I patients increased from three to five but seven patients remained in grades II and III. Four grade II and III patients were treated with stents, after which dysphagia was reduced to grade I. In the grade I patients after treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the duration of grade I was on average 167 days and survival was 191 days. In the patients subjected to stent insertion, grade I lasted 65 days and survival was 149 days. Before the introduction of the stent, grade II patients died, on average, after 91 days. After the introduction of self-expanding nitinol stents, all patients could ingest enough food and were discharged.

Multi-institutional randomized trial of external radiotherapy with and without intraluminal brachytherapy for esophageal cancer in Japan. Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group

PURPOSE

With the aim of improving the results of treatment of esophageal cancer, we designed this multi-institutional, randomized trial to establish the optimal irradiation method in radical radiation therapy for esophageal cancer by clinically evaluating external irradiation alone and in combination with intraluminal brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study population consisted of patients with squamous cell carcinoma who were expected to be successfully treated with radical radiation therapy. The patients who could be given intraluminal brachytherapy at the end of external irradiation of 60 Gy were stratified into 2 groups. Patients assigned to receive external irradiation alone received boost irradiation of 10 Gy/week on a schedule similar to the previous one, and with the same or smaller irradiation field. Intraluminal brachytherapy was performed, as a rule, with the reference dose point set at a depth of 5 mm of the esophageal submucosa, and a total of 10 Gy was irradiated at a daily dose of 5 Gy, on a once-weekly schedule with low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy equipment.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were registered, 94 of whom were analyzable, with 8 ineligible, and 1 for whom complete information was unavailable. The overall cumulative survival rate was 20.3% at 5 years. The cause-specific survival rate was 31.8% at 5 years. The cause-specific survival rate at 5 years was 27% in the external irradiation alone group and 38% in intraluminal brachytherapy combined group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.385). However, in the patients with 5 cm or less tumor length, the cause-specific survival rate was 64% at 5 years in the intraluminal brachytherapy combined group, which showed a significant improvement over 31.5% in the external irradiation alone group (p = 0.025). In the patients with Stage T1 and T2 disease, cause-specific survival rates tended to be better in the intraluminal brachytherapy combined group than in the external irradiation alone group (p = 0.088). In the patients with more than 5 cm tumor length or Stage T3-4 disease, there were no significant differences between the two groups by treatment methods (p = 0.290). The incidence of early and late complications did not differ according to whether intraluminal brachytherapy was used.

CONCLUSION

For the purpose of establishing the usefulness of intraluminal brachytherapy, further prospective randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy in tumors with short length and those with shallow invasion, or to assess the usefulness of intraluminal brachytherapy, as additional irradiation in large advanced tumors have been shown to have disappeared by diagnostic imaging after chemoradiotherapy with 60 Gy/6w external irradiation.

Simultaneous chemotherapy and radiotherapy with escalating doses of chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma

From January 1992 to January 1995, 39 patients were diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Washington, D.C. All of the patients were men aged 44 to 78, and the median age was 66. Staging included a physical examination, serum chemistries, barium swallow, endoscopy with biopsy, and computed tomographic scans of the chest and abdomen. Seven patients were ineligible for the study because they had poor performance status, refused treatment, or received treatment at another medical center. All the patients treated had a performance status of 1 to 2. In 1992, 15 patients received 400 mg/m2/d 5-fluorouracil; in 1993, eight patients received 500 mg/m2/d 5-fluorouracil; and in 1994, nine patients received 600 mg/m2/d 5-fluorouracil as a continuous intravenous infusion during radiotherapy, which consisted of 60 Gy over 6 to 8 weeks. The complete response rates were 26%, 25%, and 22% for 1992, 1993, and 1994, respectively. The median survival was 11 months, 14 months and 9 months for those same years, respectively. The major toxicities were hematologic. Three patients died of pneumonia during treatment. Simultaneous chemotherapy and radiotherapy is an effective mode of therapy for localized esophageal carcinoma. However, escalating doses of chemotherapy did not increase the complete response rate.

A non-randomized comparison of two radiotherapy protocols in inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

We report an audit of two different telebrachytherapy schedules in inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus. Between October 1990 and December 1996, 108 patients with a Karnofsky performance status > or = 50 were selected from our database on the basis of intention to treat by telebrachytherapy. Teletherapy in the low dose group L (55 patients) consisted of 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, while that in the high dose group H (53 patients) consisted of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The choice of teletherapy dose was based on physician preference. The high dose rate intraluminal radiotherapy that followed 2 weeks later was identical in both groups and consisted of two applications of 6 Gy, a week apart. The pretreatment disease characteristics of the patients in both arms were similar. Relief of dysphagia was obtained in 49% of the patients in group L and in 75% of those in group H (chi2: P = 0.004). The median dysphagia-free interval was 0 and 7 months in groups L and H respectively (log-rank: P = 0.06), while the median overall survival was identical at 8 months (log-rank: P = 0.21) for both groups. The probability of survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 34.8% versus 35.8%, 14.5% versus 13.9% and 0% versus 10% for groups L and H respectively. Morbidity in the form of ulcers, strictures and fistulae were observed in 9%, 7% and 5% of patients in group L compared with 8%, 8% and 13% in groups H respectively. This audit suggests that the protocol used in group H, when compared with group L, results in a greater proportion of patients being rendered dysphagia free, with a statistical trend towards a greater sustainment of dysphagia relief on follow-up.