Thoracic radiotherapy variables: influence on local control in small cell lung cancer limited disease

Recent advances in small cell lung cancer: the future is now?

Small cell lung cancer is a relevant clinical issue as it is a highly malignant cancer, often diagnosed in advanced stage. Similarly to non-small cell lung cancer, tobacco smoking is currently the main risk factor. Its incidence, at least in males, has declined over the past decades, due to the worldwide decreased percentage of active smokers. The typical small cells of this tumor type are characterized by a high Proliferation Index, chromosomal deletions such as 3p(14-23) involving the tumor-suppressor gene FHIT, alterations of the MYC or Notch family proteins and the frequent expression of neuroendocrine markers. The combination of thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the standard treatment for limited stage disease, while platinum-based chemotherapy is the most effective choice for extensive stage disease. Unfortunately, whatever chemotherapy is used, the results are disappointing. No regimen has proved to be effective in the long run, indeed small cell lung cancer rapidly progresses after a frequent initial strong response, and the mortality rate remains still high. The advent of immunotherapy is actually changing the landscape in oncology. As well as in other cancers, recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy, opening new perspectives for the future of our patients.

GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

Investigating a Correlation between Chemoradiotherapy Schedule Parameters and Overall Survival in a real-life LD SCLC Patient Cohort

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a treatment standard in limited disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Currently, the timing of thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) remains the subject of randomised trials and meta-analyses. To investigate a correlation between CRT schedule parameters and overall survival (OS) in a real-life patient cohort, a temporal analysis was performed. Methods: 182 LD SCLC patients successfully treated with definitive CRT were retrospectively reviewed. TRT was applied concurrently or sequentially. Impact of the treatment mode and interval of simultaneous treatment (IST) (an interval in days when chemotherapy and TRT were applied simultaneously, including time between chemotherapy cycles and weekends) on OS was analysed. Results: 71 (39%) patients were treated with concurrent and 111 (61%) with sequential CRT. Median overall survival (MS) for the entire cohort was 534 days (95%CI 461 - 607) without any significant difference between the concurrent and sequential groups (589: 95%CI 358 - 820 vs. 533: 95%CI 446 - 620 days, p=0.746, log-rank test). IST was 0 days in 111 (61%) patients treated sequentially whereas in the concurrent group, 20 (11%) and 51 (28%) patients showed an IST < 35 and > 35 days, respectively. Patients with IST > 0 and < 35 days demonstrated a trend to improved overall survival (MS: IST 0 vs. > 35 vs. < 35 was 533 vs. 448 vs. 1169 days, p=0.109, log-rank test). When patients treated with sequential CRT (IST 0) were excluded from the analysis, statistical difference in overall survival according to the IST subgroups (IST > 35 vs. < 35) became significant (p=0.021, log-rank test). On multivariate analysis of patients treated with concurrent CRT, IST > 0 and < 35 days remained a variable that significantly correlated with better overall survival (p=0.039, HR 0.38). Conclusion: In this real-life LD SCLC patient cohort, improved overall survival was achieved in patients treated with CRT schedule according to the IST > 0 and < 35-day concept. By exceeding the 35-day interval, we have seen deterioration in survival.

Patterns of care for lung cancer in radiation oncology departments of Turkey

PURPOSE

To determine the patterns of care for lung cancer in Turkish radiation oncology centers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Questionnaire forms from 21 of 24 (87.5%) centers that responded were evaluated.

RESULTS

The most frequent histology was non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (81%). The most common postoperative radiotherapy (RT) indications were close/(+) surgical margins (95%) and presence of pN2 disease (91%). The most common indications for postoperative chemotherapy (CHT) were ">/= IB" disease (19%) and the presence of pN2 disease (19%). In Stage IIIA potentially resectable NSCLC, the most frequent treatment approach was neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) (57%). In Stage IIIA unresectable and Stage IIIB disease, the most frequent approach was definitive concomitant CHRT (91%). In limited SCLC, the most common treatment approach was concomitant CHRT with cisplatin+etoposide for cycles 1-3, completion of CHT to cycles 4-6, and finally prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with complete response (71%). Six cycles of cisplatin + etoposide CHT and palliative thoracic RT, when required, was the most commonly used treatment (81%) in extensive SCLC. Sixty-two percent of centers did not have endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) facilities.

CONCLUSION

There is great variation in diagnostic testing, treatment strategies, indications for postoperative RT and CHT, RT features, and EBB availability for LC cases. To establish standards, national guidelines should be prepared using a multidisciplinary approach.

[Small cell lung cancer]

With about 20% of all lung cancers small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents a major subset of this entity. Although therapeutic improvements did not receive as much attention as in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many small steps of clinical progress have been achieved within the last 20 years. An optimal treatment should be based on an interdisciplinary treatment plan. The standard treatment in localized stages represents combined radiation and chemotherapy. Cisplatin and etoposide are in this concern considered as a gold standard. 3D-planned conformal radiotherapy should start as early as possible and should be applied concomitantly to chemotherapy and in certain cases even in a hyperfractionated treatment protocol. In very early stages surgical resection could be an option in selected cases. In advanced stages a platinum-based doublet offers high response rates. As already established in limited disease prophylactic cranial irradiation is now also indicated in extensive disease in case of any tumor remission. In the second line treatment and in patients with reduced performance status topotecan is recommended. Similar as in NSCLC pemetrexed might become an alternative treatment option in the second line setting. In the field of new targeted therapies bevacizumab achieved the most promising results. The present review highlights historical milestones and up-to-date trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. Furthermore, the role of experimental strategies and the management of certain special clinical situations are discussed.

Study of Paclitaxel, Etoposide, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Combined With Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy for Patients With Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9609 Phase II Study

Purpose

To determine the response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival, and toxicity of paclitaxel, etoposide, and cisplatin combined with accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-disease (LD) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients and Methods

LD-SCLC patients with measurable disease, Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 70, and adequate organ function who were previously untreated were eligible for the study. Treatment was as follows. In cycle 1 of chemotherapy, concurrent thoracic radiation therapy was administered. In cycles 2 to 4, chemotherapy was administered alone. In cycle 1, chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 intravenous over 3 hours on day 1, etoposide 60 mg/m2 intravenous on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 orally on days 2 and 3, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenous on day 1. In cycles 2 to 4, the paclitaxel dose was increased to 175 mg/m2, with the etoposide and cisplatin doses remaining the same as in cycle 1. The thoracic radiation therapy consisted of 1.5 Gy in 30 fractions (total dose, 45 Gy) administered 5 days a week for 3 weeks.

Results

Fifty-five patients were enrolled onto the study, and 53 were assessable. The major toxicities included grade 3 and 4 acute neutropenia (32% and 43%, respectively) and grade 3 and 4 esophagitis (32% and 4%, respectively). Two patients died as a result of therapy (one died of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and one died of sepsis). There was one late fatal pulmonary toxicity. The median survival time was 24.7 months. The 2-year survival rate was 54.7%. The median progression-free survival time was 13 months, with a 2-year progression-free survival rate of 26.4%.

Conclusion

Although this therapeutic regimen is effective in the treatment of patients with LD-SCLC, it is unlikely that the three-drug combination with thoracic radiation therapy will improve the survival times compared with the etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen with thoracic radiation therapy in LD-SCLC patients.

Chest radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: facts, questions, prospects

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN

Limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) is initially very sensitive to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the 5-year survival is generally only 10-15%, with most patients failing with therapy refractory relapses, both locally and in distant sites. The addition of chest irradiation to chemotherapy increases the absolute survival by approximately 5%. We reviewed the many controversies regarding optimal timing and irradiation technique.

RESULTS

No strong data support total radiation doses over 50 Gy. According to one phase III trial and several retrospective studies, increasing the volume of the radiation fields to the pre-chemotherapy tumour volume instead of the post-chemotherapy volume does not improve local control.

CONCLUSIONS

The total time in which the entire combined-modality treatment is delivered may be important. From seven randomized trials, it can be concluded that the timing of the radiotherapy as such is not very important. Some phase III trials support the use of accelerated chest radiation together with cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy, delivered from the first day of treatment, although no firm conclusions can be drawn from the available data. The best results are reported in studies in which the time from the start of treatment to the end of the radiotherapy was less than 30 days. This has to be taken into consideration when treatment modalities incorporating new chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy are considered.

Phase II trial of up-front accelerated thoracic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and optional up-front prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited small-cell lung cancer. Groupe d'Oncologie Thoracique des Régions Alpines

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and outcome of bifractionated, up-front thoracic radiotherapy (TR) (45 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.5 Gy twice daily over 3 weeks) combined with chemotherapy (CT) (six cycles of cisplatin and etoposide) and optional low-dose, up-front prophylactic cranial irradiation (18 Gy in 10 fractions of 1.8 Gy twice daily over 5 days) in limited small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CT (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) for 3 days and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) for 3 days) was started on day 8 or 15 after the first TR treatment. In the five subsequent cycles, cisplatin was given as a single 100-mg/m(2) dose on day 1 every 4 weeks. A total of 52 patients were entered (41 men and 11 women); the median age was 55 years (range, 33 to 67 years). World Health Organization performance status was 0 in 34 patients, 1 in 16 patients, and 2 in two patients. Thirty-six patients (69%) received the full planned six cycles of CT.

RESULTS

All treated patients were assessable for response. Thirty-one patients (60%) achieved a complete response, and 16 (30%) had a partial response. One-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 84%), 34% (95% CI, 21% to 49%), and 32% (95 CI, 16% to 46%), respectively. The median survival time was 18 months. Event-free survival at 1 year was 45% (95% CI, 32% to 58%) and at 3 years, 30% (95% CI, 18% to 44%). The main radiation-related acute toxicity was esophageal: 38% of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. CT was well tolerated. Although grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 86% of the patients, only 4% presented with associated fever. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting was seen in 35% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This trial demonstrates that up-front accelerated TR associated with CT is feasible, has acceptable toxicity, and shows considerable long-term survival potential.

Small-cell lung carcinoma: an analysis of 194 consecutive patients

The treatment of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) requires the careful combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. To understand the factors involved in the outcome of these patients, the authors undertook a study of patients treated for limited stage SCLC. The charts of 194 consecutive patients treated at our facilities between 1986 and 1994 were reviewed. All patients underwent thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), 50% received prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), and all but one received chemotherapy. The probability of survival at 5 years was 14%, and the disease-free survival (DFS) was 17%. Patients receiving a combination of platinum and etoposide (PE) and Cytoxan (Bristol-Myers, Evansville, IN, U.S.A.), Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Dublin, OH, U.S.A.), and Vincristine (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.) (CAV) experienced a DFS at 3 years of 31%, versus 14% for CAV only and 18% for PE only (p = 0.004). In a multivariate survival analysis, only PCI (p = 0.001), having received PE and CAV (p = 0.01), and response to treatment (p = 0.001) were significant. Radiation dose and field size did not influence outcome. The combination of PE and CAV chemotherapy produced the best results in our series. Unanswered questions regarding the optimal TRT dose, field size, and timing of TRT await the results of ongoing randomized trials.

Effect of low-dose chest irradiation before chemotherapy on the rate of local failure in small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate of tumor recurrence within the irradiated volume after initial low-dose irradiation of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), to assess the tolerance of a sequential combination of low-dose chest irradiation followed by chemotherapy, and to confirm the responsiveness of limited-stage SCLC to low-dose irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this pilot study, 26 patients with limited-stage SCLC were treated by first-line 20-Gy thoracic irradiation followed 3 weeks later by chemotherapy (cisplatin, doxorubicin, and etoposide for six cycles).

RESULTS

We present our final results with a median follow-up of surviving patients of 7 years. The response rate to this low-dose irradiation was 83%, with an overall response rate to radiochemotherapy of 96% and a median survival of 21 months. No unexpected early or late toxicity was observed. The rate of initial isolated local failure was 8%, which compares favorably with other published series using higher doses of radiochemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

An initial chest irradiation of 20 Gy before chemotherapy could be sufficient to reduce the risk of local failure during the time of survival of patients with limited-stage SCLC. Potential advantages of this treatment may be the prevention of resistance mechanisms to radiotherapy induced by preliminary chemotherapy and a reduced radiation-induced toxicity.

Factors influencing the development of lung fibrosis after chemoradiation for small cell carcinoma of the lung: evidence for inherent interindividual variation

PURPOSE

Clinical observations often reveal individual differences in the severity of lung fibrosis after definitive radiation therapy for lung cancer. Recent experimental studies suggest that the risk of developing lung fibrosis may be genetically controlled. The present study was undertaken to examine the magnitude of individual variation in the incidence and severity of lung fibrosis in a well-defined patient population treated by concurrent chemoradiation for limited small-cell lung carcinomas (LSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 1994, 56 patients with LSCLC were enrolled in one of two controlled prospective studies of concurrent chemotherapy and concomitant conventional (45 Gy in 25 fractions q.d. over 5 weeks) or accelerated (45 Gy in 30 fractions b.i.d. over 3 weeks) radiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin and etoposide (PE) or PE plus ifosfamide and mesna (PIE). Of the 56, a group of 25 patients who had serial computerized tomography (CT) examinations of the chest and were deemed to have unequivocal radiographic complete responses were selected for this study. The severity of lung fibrosis was recorded for each patient from the CT images using an arbitrary scale (0 to 3) at 1 year after treatment. Radiographic fibrosis scores were recorded on 1-3 CT slices in 3 different dose-areas (20-30 Gy; 30-40 Gy; and >40 Gy) that were defined using the corresponding CT slices from the patient's CT treatment plan. Of these patients, 23 (92%) had at least 2 slices scored; 11 patients had all 3 slices scored.

RESULTS

Among the clinical and treatment parameters investigated (including type of chemotherapy), only total dose and fractionation schedule were identified as significant and independent determinants of lung fibrosis. Radiographic fibrosis scores were higher in high-dose areas and among patients treated with the accelerated schedule. Using a fit of the proportional odds (PO) model based on the total dose and fractionation schedule, fibrosis score residuals were calculated for each patient. The residual for each score is defined as the difference between the observed and expected score based on the dose and treatment schedule received. Average residuals varied significantly among patients (p = 0.005, Kruskal-Willis test). Using a modified version of the PO model, the coefficient of variation in patient heterogeneity was estimated to be 10.1% (95% confidence interval: 6.2-14.9%). Inclusion of the heterogeneity factor, in addition to total dose and fractionation schedule, improved the fit of the PO model to an extremely high level of significance (p < 10(-7)).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the risk and severity of lung fibrosis analyzed radiographically on CT images increases with total dose and with the use of an accelerated radiation schedule, for patients treated with chemoradiation for small-cell lung cancer. There was also demonstrable patient-to-patient heterogeneity, suggesting that the risk of lung fibrosis is strongly affected by inherent factors that vary among individuals.

Carboplatin, etoposide, and accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for elderly patients with limited small cell lung carcinoma: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

It is not clear how well elderly patients with limited small cell lung carcinoma tolerate intensive chemotherapy, and they have often been treated with palliative intent. As an alternative strategy, the authors designed and employed a short term combination regimen consisting of carboplatin and etoposide with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients ages > or = 70 years with a Karnofsky performance status of > or = 60 and no other major medical problems, were enrolled in this study and 72 were evaluable. The protocol consisted of intravenous carboplatin (400 mg/m2) given on Days 1 and 29, oral etoposide (50 mg/m2) given on Days 1-21 and 29-49, and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation at a dose of 1.5 gray (Gy) administered twice daily (total dose, 45 Gy) starting on Day 1.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 61 months. The response rate was 75%, and complete response was observed in 57% of the patients. The median survival time was 15 months, and the 2- and 5-year survival rates were 32% and 13%, respectively. Acute Grade 3 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and esophagitis were observed in 8.3%, 11%, and 2.8% of the patients, respectively. Only one patient experienced Grade 4 acute toxicity (thrombocytopenia). No late toxicity of Grade 3 or higher was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This combined treatment program was tolerable and produced promising long term results. Elderly patients should not universally be treated with palliative intent. Further studies exploring a potentially more effective regimen are warranted.

Outcome of patients with small-cell lung cancer during 20 years of clinical research at the US National Cancer Institute

OBJECTIVE

To determine the outcome of all patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated at the US National Cancer Institute between April 1973 and April 1993.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed a series of 594 consecutive patients with SCLC treated at a single institution during a 20-year period to assess changes in duration of survival and toxicity related to various treatment regimens.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For analysis, patients were grouped by decade, and the duration of survival of patients with limited- and extensive-stage SCLC was examined to assess whether patients treated during the first decade of the study (1973 through 1983), when cyclophosphamide-based regimens were used, had different outcomes than those treated during the second decade (1983 through 1993), when cisplatin-based regimens were used. Patients had a minimal follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the survival of patients with limited- or extensive-stage SCLC treated during the second decade in comparison with during the first decade of the study. Among patients with extensive-stage SCLC, performance status 3 or 4 and metastatic lesions of the liver and central nervous system had a significant adverse effect on survival in both the first and the second decade. Among patients with limited-stage disease, performance status 3 or 4 had the most significant adverse influence on survival during the overall study period. In addition, in a multivariate analysis, etoposide-cisplatin plus twice-daily chest radiotherapy was significantly associated with prolonged survival (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

We noted no significant change in the duration of survival of patients with either limited-or extensive-stage SCLC treated at our institution during a 20-year period. A multivariate analysis showed that patients with limited-stage SCLC given a cisplatin-based regimen plus chest radiotherapy lived modestly longer than similar patients given cyclophosphamide regimens at our institution. No evidence was found of changes in pretreatment factors that would affect survival.

Indications, Results and Techniques of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and background

To define the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) on the basis of clinical data reported in the medical literature.

Methods

Published reports are critically reviewed, with particular attention to randomized trials.

Results

Thoracic radiotherapy has an important role in improving local control and 3-year survival in limited-stage SCLC; radiation should be delivered early in the course of the chemotherapy program, avoiding large volumes and total doses exceeding 40-50 Gy. Thoracic radiotherapy probably has no role in resected patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and may even be detrimental in patients with extensive SCLC. Prophylactic cranial irradiation has been shown to reduce the risk of brain relapse, but it is not associated with a consistent increase in survival or cure rate: its use in clinical practice is therefore not advised.

Conclusions

Survival rates approaching 50% at 2 years are now possible in limited SCLC with the integrated effort of the surgeon, the medical oncologist and the radiation oncologist; their strict cooperation appears to be of the utmost importance in the earliest phase of treatment planning.

Lung cancer

This synthesis of the literature on radiotherapy for lung cancer is based on 80 scientific articles, including 2 meta-analyses, 29 randomized studies, 19 prospective studies, and 21 retrospective studies. These studies involve 28172 patients. Basic treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), is chemotherapy. Addition of radiotherapy to the primary tumor and mediastinum reduces local recurrence, prolongs long-term survival, and is often indicated. Current, and future, studies can be expected to show successive improvements in results for SCLC by optimizing the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Should these treatments be given simultaneously or sequentially, and in which order? Which fractionation is best? Probably, no change in resource requirements for radiotherapy will be necessary, with the possible exception of changes in fractionation. Surgery constitutes primary treatment for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages I and II. Radiotherapy may provide an alternative for patients who are inoperable for medical reasons. The value of radiotherapy following radical surgery for NSCLC remains to be shown. It is not indicated based on current knowledge. For NSCLC stage III, radiotherapy shrinks tumors and prolongs survival at 2 and 3 years. Whether it influences long-term survival after 5 years has not been shown. Considering the side effects of treatment, one must question whether limited improvements in survival motivate routine radiotherapy in these patients. Earlier attempts to add chemotherapy to radiotherapy to improve treatment results of NSCLC have not yielded convincing results. Several studies are currently on-going. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) greatly reduces the risk for brain metastases from SCLC. However, it has little influence on survival. Many treatment centers give PCI to SCLC patients who have achieved complete remission. This practice may be questioned since PCI is associated with serious complications. PCI is not indicated in patients with NSCLC. In SCLC, where the disease is extensive, only palliative radiotherapy is appropriate. Radiotherapy is an important treatment alternative in special palliative situations involving severe cough, severe bleeding, pain, pulmonary obstructions, and vena cava superior syndrome. In these situations, good results may be achieved with few fractions.

Early alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy schedule in limited disease stage small cell lung cancer

44 patients with limited small cell lung cancer were treated with six cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatinum 60 mg/m2 day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1-3) alternating with three courses of mediastinal irradiation, the first one starting 7 days after the first day of chemotherapy. A total dose of 55 Gy was delivered. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (30 Gy after the third cycle of chemotherapy) was left to the physician's discretion. 4 patients had radical surgery before combined modality treatment. 29 patients finished the scheduled program. The complete response rate (bronchoscopically confirmed) was 25.6% after two cycles of chemotherapy and 41% at the end of treatment. Median survival time was 17.2 months, with an estimated survival of 32% at 2 years. Main toxicity was haematological with one early toxic death and six premature interruptions of treatment. We conclude that this treatment modality is feasible and efficacious. Prospective studies comparing chemotherapy with alternating or concurrent early radiotherapy schedules in limited disease small cell lung cancer are needed to determine the best treatment modality.

Small cell lung cancer. State-of-the-art therapy 1994

In the United States, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for about 20% of all cases of lung cancer. Without treatment, tumor progression in patients with SCLC is rapid, with a median survival of 2 to 4 months. Modern chemotherapy has yielded multifold increases in median survival, but only minimal improvements have occurred over the last decade. Combination chemotherapy with etoposide/cisplatin prolongs survival, especially in patients with limited disease. In patients at high risk of toxicity from standard combination chemotherapy, single-agent chemotherapy may have a viable role, but whether its efficacy is comparable to combination regimens must be established in clinical trials. Clearly, new, more effective drugs will be required for any major improvements in the treatment of SCLC. Combined-modality therapy employing chemotherapy and chest irradiation appears to produce excellent cytotoxic effects and is relatively well tolerated in patients with limited disease. A recent meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials showed a modest but significant 14% reduction in the relative mortality rate of patients receiving chemotherapy/chest irradiation vs those receiving chemotherapy alone. Surgery as sole treatment can produce cures in highly selected patients with limited disease and can reduce the rate of local recurrence. The use of surgery after definitive treatment remains experimental and should not be considered other than in controlled clinical trials.

Surgery for cure followed by chemotherapy in small cell carcinoma of the lung. For the ISC-Lung Cancer Study Group

The Lung Cancer Study Group of the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC-LCSG) organized multinational, cooperative, prospective and randomized trials for the cure of patients with small cell lung cancer at early stages (T1,2N0M0). Surgery for cure was used first, followed by postoperative chemotherapy, and thereafter by prophylactic cranial irradiation. Eight cycles of standard chemotherapy (CAV-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine) or 6 intermittent cycles of alternating chemotherapy, using 3 different drug combinations, were administered 1-2 weeks postoperatively for 6 months after randomization. A total of 183 evaluable patients received surgery for cure at 23 cooperating hospitals. The preliminary evaluation of ISC-studies I and II per May 1993 resulted in the 30-month total survival of 63% from 68 patients after complete resection at TN0M0R0-stages and 37% from 27 patients after such resections at TN2M0R0-stages. Their incidence of local recurrence as first relapse was quite similar (11/47:8/39). The related 4-year recurrence-free survival (57%, 37%), indicating a plateau-like curve of long-term survivors. These promising results have to be confirmed by larger studies. We conclude that the indication for surgery as the first treatment step for SCLC should be the same as for the other non-small subtypes of lung cancers.

Mediastinoscopy incisional metastasis. A radiotherapeutic approach

Tumor seeding of the mediastinoscopy tract has been described. Although it is a rare occurrence, it can present the radiation oncologist with a therapeutic dilemma. Two cases of mediastinoscopy scar recurrences are reported. Their response to treatment and a review of previous cases are included.

The impact of surgery on the multidisciplinary treatment of bronchogenic small cell carcinoma (updated review including ongoing studies)

Recent results of studies on patients with SCLC treated by surgery with curative intent followed by adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrate a definite progress in comparison to non-surgical-treatment programs for patients with comparable stage of disease. Of 186 randomized patients enrolled for the multicenter cooperative ISC-Study I and II, 76 patients with stage pT1-3N0M0 received surgery for cure followed by chemotherapy and selective radiotherapy to the brain. The projected 4 year crude survival rate by September 1991 was 57%. In 27 of 43 patients with stage pT1-3N2M0, the tumors were completely resected, resulting in a 4 year survival rate of 32%. The survival curve for both groups of patients shows a sharp bent at 27 months postoperatively, whereafter the survival curves take a plateau-like course. These promising results were confirmed by several other groups. They are in favour of initial surgery for resectable tumors, followed by postoperative chemotherapy, while patients on preoperative chemotherapy followed by adjuvant surgery showed less favourable results.

Limited Small Cell Lung Cancer of the Lung Treated with Combination Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis

We assessed the outcome in 65 patients with limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated from 1980 through 1989 with combination chemotherapy and chest and cranial irradiation. Of the 65 patients, 32.3 % (21/65) achieved a complete remission (CR) prior to radiation therapy; six additional cases achieved a CR after radiotherapy with an improvement of 10% in the incidence of CR. In our group, 8 patients were alive and free of disease at 30 months (12.3 %). We think that a combination of local thoracic irradiation in SCLC limited disease plus chemotherapy yields more CR and improves survival, especially in the group of patients who obtained the CR after initial induction chemotherapy.