Radiobiologic studies comparing Yttrium-90 irradiation and external beam irradiation in vitro

Phase I/II Trial of Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Radioimmunotherapy, Gemcitabine, and Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Fluorodeoxyuridine Postresection of Liver Metastasis for Colorectal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Report the feasibility, toxicities, and long-term results of a Phase I/II trial of ⁹⁰Y-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) (cT84.66) radioimmunotherapy (RIT), gemcitabine, and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) after maximal hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver postresection or ablation to minimum disease were eligible. Each cohort received HAI of FUdR for 14 days on a dose escalation schedule. The maximum HAI FUdR dose level planned was 0.2 mg/kg/day, which is the standard dose for HAI FUdR alone. On day 9, ⁹⁰Y-cT84.66 anti-CEA at 16.6 mCi/m² as an i.v. bolus infusion and on days 9-11 i.v. gemcitabine at 105 mg/m² were given. Patients could receive up to three cycles every 6 weeks of protocol therapy. Four additional cycles of HAI FUdR were allowed after RIT.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were treated on this study. A maximum tolerated dose of 0.20 mg/kg/day of HAI FUdR combined with RIT at 16.6 mCi/m² and gemcitabine at 105 mg/m² was achieved with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 reversible toxicity (mucositis). After surgery, 10 patients had no evidence of visible disease and remained without evidence of disease after completion of protocol therapy. The remaining 6 patients demonstrated radiological visible disease after surgery and after protocol therapy 2 patients had a CR, 1 patient had PR, 2 had stable disease, and 1 had progression. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months (18.7-114.6), median progression free survival was 9.6 months. Two patients demonstrated long-term disease control out to 45+ and 113+ months.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the safety, feasibility, and potential utility of HAI FUdR, RIT, and systemic gemcitabine. The trimodality approach does not have higher hematologic toxicities than seen in prior RIT-alone studies. Future efforts evaluating RIT in colorectal cancer should integrate RIT with systemic and regional therapies in the minimal tumor burden setting.

Cellular Response to Exponentially Increasing and Decreasing Dose Rates: Implications for Treatment Planning in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy

The treatment of cancer using targeted radionuclide therapy is of interest to nuclear medicine and radiation oncology because of its potential for killing tumor cells while minimizing dose-limiting toxicities to normal tissue. The ionizing radiations emitted by radiopharmaceuticals deliver radiation absorbed doses over protracted periods of time with continuously varying dose rates. As targeted radionuclide therapy becomes a more prominent part of cancer therapy, accurate models for estimating the biologically effective dose (BED) or equieffective dose (EQD2α/β) will become essential for treatment planning. This study examines the radiobiological impact of the dose rate increase half-time during the uptake phase of the radiopharmaceutical. MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells and V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts were irradiated chronically with 662 keV γ rays delivered with time-varying dose rates that are clinically relevant. The temporal dose-rate patterns were: 1. acute, 2. exponential decrease with a half-time of 64 h (Td = 64 h), 3. initial exponential increase to a maximum (half time Ti = 2, 8 or 24 h) followed by exponential decrease (Td = 64 h). Cell survival assays were conducted and surviving fractions were determined. There was a marked reduction in biological effect when Ti was increased. Cell survival data were tested against existing dose-response models to assess their capacity to predict response. Currently accepted models that are used in radiation oncology overestimated BED and EQD2α/β at low-dose rates and underestimated them at high-dose rates. This appears to be caused by an adaptive response arising as a consequence of the initial low-dose-rate phase of exposure. An adaptive response function was derived that yields more accurate BED and EQD2α/β values over the spectrum of dose rates and absorbed doses delivered. Our experimental data demonstrate a marked increase in cell survival when the dose-rate-increase half-time is increased, thereby suggesting an adaptive response arising as a consequence of this phase of exposure. We have modified conventional radiobiological models used in the clinic for brachytherapy and external beams of radiation to account for this phenomenon and facilitate their use for treatment planning in targeted radionuclide therapy.

Requirements regarding dose rate and exposure time for killing of tumour cells in beta particle radionuclide therapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify combinations of dose rate and exposure time that have the potential to provide curative treatment with targeted radionuclide therapy applying low dose rate beta irradiation.

METHODS

Five tumour cell lines, U-373MG and U-118MG gliomas, HT-29 colon carcinoma, A-431 cervical squamous carcinoma and SKBR-3 breast cancer, were used. An experimental model with 10(5) tumour cells in each sample was irradiated with low dose rate beta particles. The criterion for successful treatment was absence of recovery of cells during a follow-up period of 3 months. The initial dose rates were in the range 0.1-0.8 Gy/h, and the cells were continuously exposed for 1, 3 or 7 days. These combinations covered dose rates and doses achievable in targeted radionuclide therapy.

RESULTS

Continuous irradiation with dose rates of 0.2-0.3 and 0.4-0.6 Gy/h for 7 and 3 days, respectively, could kill all cells in each tumour cell sample. These treatments gave total radiation doses of 30-40 Gy. However, when exposed for just 24 h with about 0.8 Gy/h, only the SKBR-3 cells were successfully treated; all the other cell types recovered. There were large cell type-dependent variations in the growth delay patterns for the cultures that recovered. The U-118MG cells were most resistant and the U-373MG and SKBR-3 cells most sensitive to the treatments. The HT-29 and A-431 cells were intermediate.

CONCLUSION

The results serve as a guideline for the combinations of dose rate and exposure time necessary to kill tumour cells when applying low dose rate beta irradiation. The shift from recovery to "cure" fell within a narrow range of dose rate and exposure time combinations.

Clinical trial design and scoring of radionuclide therapy endpoints: normal organ toxicity and tumor response

Like other cancer therapy agents under development, radionuclide therapies are usually evaluated in a progressive series of clinical trials after basic science, human cell culture and animal model studies. Toxicities during these trials are graded using common scoring systems that are in widespread use such as the Common Toxicity Criteria from the National Cancer Institute. Information on normal tissue toxicity from radionuclides is more limited than that from external beam radiation and is more variable. Variability is likely due to many biologic factors as well as less precise dose quantitation than those used in external beam radiation practice. As expected based on known radiobiologic effects, tolerance to radionuclide therapy appears to exceed that from high dose rate external beam radiation in most organs. Although the correlation between reported dose estimates and toxicity has progressively and substantially improved over the past two decades, further progress is needed to establish optimal toxicity predictive relationships. Continued refinement of dosimetry techniques and standardization is expected to increase the accuracy and comparability of radiation dose reports between institutions as well as improve dose/response correlation.

Treatment of lung tumor colonies with 90Y targeted to blood vessels: comparison with the alpha-particle emitter 213Bi

An in vivo lung tumor model system for radioimmunotherapy of lung metastases was used to test the relative effectiveness of the vascular- targeted beta-particle emitter 90Y, and alpha-particle emitter, 213Bi. Yttrium-90 was shown to be stably bound by CHXa" DTPA-MAb 201B conjugates and delivered efficiently to lung tumor blood vessels. Dosimetry calculations indicated that the lung received 16.2 Gy/MBq from treatment with 90Y MAb 201B, which was a sevenfold greater absorbed dose than any other organ examined. Therapy was optimal for 90Y with 3 MBq injected. Bismuth-213 MAb 201B also delivered a similar absorbed dose (15Gy/MBq) to the lung. Yttrium-90 was found to be slightly more effective against larger tumors than 213Bi, consistent with the larger range of 2 MeV beta particles from 90Y than the 8 MeV alpha particles from 213Bi. Treatment of EMT-6 tumors growing in immunodeficient SCID mice with 90Y or 213Bi MAb 201 resulted in significant destruction of tumor colonies; however, 90Y MAb 201B was toxic for the SCID mice, inflicting acute lung damage. In another tumor model, IC-12 rat tracheal carcinoma growing in SCID mouse lungs, 90Y therapy was more effective than 213Bi at destroying lung tumors. However, 90Y MAb 201B toxicity for the lung limited any therapeutic effect. We conclude that, although vascular-targeted 90Y MAb can be an effective therapeutic agent, particularly for larger tumors, in this model system, acute damage to the lung may limit its application.

Proliferation and the advantage of longer-lived radionuclides in radioimmunotherapy

In our previous study we used the linear-quadratic model [J. Nucl. Med. 35, 1861 (1994)] to confirm our initial finding, based on the time-dose-fractionation model [J. Nucl. Med. 34, 1801 (1993)], that longer-lived radionuclides (e.g., 32P, 91Y) can offer a substantial therapeutic advantage over the shorter-lived radionuclides presently used in radioimmunotherapy (e.g., 90Y). The original calculations using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model did not account for proliferation of the tumor and critical bone marrow tissues. It has been suggested that inclusion of a proliferation term in the LQ model can have a substantial impact on the biologically effective dose (BED). With this in mind, we have reexamined the therapeutic efficacy of longer versus short-lived radionuclides using the LQ model replete with proliferation terms for tumor and bone marrow. Relative advantage factors (RAF), which quantify the overall therapeutic advantage of a long-lived compared to short-lived radionuclide, were calculated accordingly. While the extrapolated initial dose rate required to achieve a given BED can be affected by the inclusion of proliferation terms for both the tumor and marrow, the relative advantage factors for the longer-lived radionuclides were not significantly affected. Longer-lived radionuclides such as (114m)In and 91Y are about three times more therapeutically effective than the shorter-lived 90Y which is currently used in RIT. In other words, for a given therapeutic effect in the tumor, a longer-lived radionuclide can result in a lower deleterious effect to the bone marrow than a short-lived radionuclide. Given that bone marrow is generally considered to be the dose-limiting organ, these results have important implications for radioimmunotherapy.

Calculated and TLD-based absorbed dose estimates for I-131-labeled 3F8 monoclonal antibody in a human neuroblastoma xenograft nude mouse model

Preclinical evaluation of the therapeutic potential of radiolabeled antibodies is commonly performed in a xenografted nude mouse model. To assess therapeutic efficacy it is important to estimate the absorbed dose to the tumor and normal tissues of the nude mouse. The current study was designed to accurately measure radiation does to human neuroblastoma xenografts and normal organs in nude mice treated with I-131-labeled 3F8 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) against disialoganglioside GD2 antigen. Absorbed dose estimates were obtained using two different approaches: (1) measurement with teflon-imbedded CaSO4:Dy mini-thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and (2) calculations using mouse S-factors. The calculated total dose to tumor one week after i.v. injection of the 50 microCi I-131-3F8 MoAb was 604 cGy. The corresponding decay corrected and not corrected TLD measurements were 109 +/- 9 and 48.7 +/- 3.4 cGy respectively. The calculated to TLD-derived dose ratios for tumor ranged from 6.1 at 24 h to 5.5 at 1 week. The light output fading rate was found to depend upon the tissue type within which the TLDs were implanted. The decay rate in tumor, muscle, subcutaneous tissue and in vitro, were 9.5, 5.0, 3.7 and 0.67% per day, respectively. We have demonstrated that the type of tissue in which the TLD was implanted strongly influenced the in vivo decay of light output. Even with decay correction, a significant discrepancy was observed between MIRD-based calculated and CaSO4:Dy mini-TLD measured absorbed doses. Batch dependence, pH of the tumor or other variables associated with TLDs which are not as yet well known may account for this discrepancy.

Comparison of radioimmunotherapy and external beam radiotherapy in colon cancer xenografts

Radioimmunotherapy and external beam radiotherapy were compared in a nude mouse human colon cancer model. Radioimmunotherapy was delivered by intraperitoneal injection of 90Y-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody (anti-CEA MAB). Single fraction external beam radiotherapy was delivered using a 60Co teletherapy unit. Control groups received saline, unlabeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody and labeled nonspecific monoclonal antibody. Subcutaneous CEA-expressing LS174T human colon carcinoma tumors were measured over time. Tumor growth suppression was expressed as delay to reach 2g compared to saline controls. Unlabeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody and labeled nonspecific monoclonal antibody had no effect. External beam radiotherapy of 300, 600, 1000 and 2000 cGy produced growth delays of 3, 12, 17, and 22 days, respectively. Radioimmunotherapy with 120 microCi, 175 microCi, and 225 microCi resulted in growth delays of 20, 34, and 36 days. Estimated absorbed tumor dose was 1750 cGy in the 120 microCi group. Similar comparisons were done with the more radioresistant WiDr human colon carcinoma cell line. External beam radiotherapy doses of 400, 800, 1200, and 1600 cGy resulted in growth delays of 6, 21, 36 and 48 days, respectively. Radioimmunotherapy of 120 microCi and 175 microCi resulted in growth delays of 9 and 19 days, respectively. The 120 microCi dose delivered an estimated absorbed tumor dose of 1080 cGy to WiDr tumors. In summary, for the radiosensitive LS174T line, radioimmunotherapy produced biologic effects that were comparable to a similar dose of single fraction external beam radiotherapy. For the more radioresistant WiDr tumor, radioimmunotherapy produced a biologic effect which was less than a similar dose of single fraction external beam radiotherapy. These studies suggest that a tumor's response to radioimmunotherapy relative to that of external beam radiotherapy is, in part, dependent on tumor radiosensitivity and repair capacity.

Overview of animal studies comparing radioimmunotherapy with dose equivalent external beam irradiation

As the field of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) continues to develop and looks increasingly promising, there is growing interest in the radiobiology of RIT. Recently, several investigators have conducted studies in animal models comparing the relative efficacy of RIT with dose equivalent external beam irradiation. Although these studies are the first of many to follow, the results are provocative and several patterns are suggested by the available data. The results of the studies are summarized and compared, and preliminary hypotheses that might explain the reported observations are discussed. In summary, results from studies comparing the efficacy of RIT with external beam irradiation have been variable and may be indicative of different underlying mechanisms. While the particular experimental model, design and methodology used to compare the efficacy of RIT with external beam irradiation are probably important influences upon subsequent observations, it appears that for a given tumor type, the size of the survival curve shoulder or alpha/beta ratio, and tumor doubling time are important determinants of the magnitude of the dose rate effect. When this effect is minimal, it is possible that other factors such as reoxygenation, the arrest of cells in G2, and selective targeting of tumor by radiolabelled antibody may explain, in part, the increased efficacy of RIT compared with external beam irradiation that has been observed in some systems.