Three-dimensional treatment planning for postoperative treatment of rectal carcinoma

The relationship between belly board position and patient anatomy and its influence on dose-volume histogram of small bowel for postoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer

The influence of three different belly board (BB) positions in radiotherapy of rectal cancer on the dose-volume histogram of the small bowel (SB) were analysed for 20 patients. Placing the lower border of the BB opening near the lumbosacral junction, both the volume of SB within the pelvis and the volume of SB within all tested dose levels were lower compared to its position near the symphysis or the lumbosacral junction.

Adjuvant therapy of resectable rectal cancer

The two conventional treatments for clinically resectable rectal cancer are surgery followed by postoperative combined modality therapy and preoperative combined modality therapy followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative therapy (most commonly combined modality therapy) has gained acceptance as a standard adjuvant therapy. The potential advantages of the preoperative approach include decreased tumor seeding, less acute toxicity, increased radiosensitivity due to more oxygenated cells, and enhanced sphincter preservation. There are a number of new chemotherapeutic agents that have been developed for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Phase I/II trials examining the use of new chemotherapeutic agents in combination with pelvic radiation therapy are in progress.

Dislocation of small bowel volume within box pelvic treatment fields, using new "up down table" device

PURPOSE

To present the impact of a novel minimization device, the up down table (UDT), on the volume of small bowel included within a 4-field pelvic irradiation plan.

METHODS

A polystyrene bowel displacement standard mold was created and added to a customized vacuum cushion (Vac Lok) formed around the abdomen and legs of each patient in the prone position. Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients with pelvic malignancies treated with the UDT device were compared with 1 historic series (68 cases) treated at our division. Small bowel contrast dyes at the time of simulation were used in all patients.

RESULTS

The average volume of small bowel within the planning target volume (high-dose volume, calculated with Gallagher method) was 100 cm(3) (median 49 +/- 114) in the series treated with standard box technique and 23 cm(3) (median 0 +/- 64) in the series treated with the UDT (p < 0.001). The average volume of small bowel included in any isodose (any-dose volume) was 505 cm(3) (median 447 +/- 338) and 158 cm(3) (median 69 +/- 207), respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of G1, G2, and G3 acute enteric toxicity (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria) in the UDT series was 16%, 15%, and 1.5%; in the standard box technique, it was 28%, 25%, and 3%, respectively (p < 0.05). The incidence of acute enteric toxicity directly correlated with the irradiated small bowel volume. In the UDT series, the 5-year actuarial incidence of G3 chronic enteric toxicity was 1.8%. The setup procedures, analyzed in 18 cases, revealed no systematic errors and a standard deviation equal to +/-5 mm for random errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The UDT technique is comfortable, inexpensive, highly reproducible, and permits an almost full bowel displacement from standard radiotherapy fields.

Preoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma--aspects of acute adverse effects and radiation technique

PURPOSE

To explain a possible association between treatment technique and postoperative mortality after preoperative radiotherapy of rectal carcinoma, the dose distributions were compared in model experiments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Preoperative radiotherapy with a three-beam technique delivered in five fractions to 25 Gy (5 Gy/daily for 5 or 7 days) was given to patients with primary resectable rectal carcinoma. The adverse effects of this treatment, both acute and late, have been low. In a parallel trial using an identical fractionation schedule and total dose but with a two-beam technique, the postoperative mortality was higher. Two-, three-, and four-beam techniques were analyzed in 20 patients with computed tomography based, three-dimensional dose planning. Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms in the planning target volume (PTV) and in the organs at risk were considered. A numerical "biological" model was used to compare the techniques.

RESULTS

The two-beam and the four-beam box techniques give the most homogeneous dose distributions in the PTV, although all techniques result in dose distributions that would be considered adequate, provided 16 MV or higher photon energies are used. Three- and four-beam techniques show advantages over the two-beam technique with respect to organs at risk, particularly the small bowel. With the two-beam technique and the upper beam limit at mid-L4, the volume of the bowel that receives > 95% of the prescribed dose, and hence, is included in the treated volume (TV), is more than twice as large as that with three- and four-beam techniques, and that of the total body between 1.5 and 2 times as large. The results of the analyses using the biological model indicate that the three- and four-beam techniques result in less small bowel complication rates than the two-beam technique. The integral energy to the total body is similar for all treatment modalities compared.

CONCLUSIONS

The volume of bowel included in the TV, rather than the energy imparted to the body, influences postoperative mortality, and emphasizes the importance of precise radiotherapy planning to minimize normal tissue toxicity.

Three-dimensional conformal pancreas treatment: comparison of four- to six-field techniques

PURPOSE

We compare practical conformal treatment approaches to pancreatic cancer using 6 and 18 MV photons and contrast those approaches against standard techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A four-field conformal technique for treating pancreas cancer has been developed using nonopposed 18 MV photons. This approach has been extended to 6 MV photon application by the addition of one to two fields. These techniques have been optimized to increase sparing of normal liver and bowel, compared with opposed-field methods, to improve patient tolerance of high doses. In this study we compare these techniques in a simulated tumor model in a cylindrical phantom. Dose-volume analysis is used to quantify differences between the conformal, nonopposed techniques with conformal, opposed field methods. This model is also used to evaluate the effect of 1-2 cm setup errors on dose-volume coverage.

RESULTS

Dose-volume analysis demonstrates that five-to-six field conformal treatments using 6 MV photons provides similar or better dose coverage and normal tissue sparing characteristics as an optimized 18 MV, four-field approach when 1-2 cm margins are included for setup uncertainty. All approaches using nonopposed beam geometry provide significant reduction in the volume of tissue encompassed by the 30-50% isodose surfaces, as compared with four-field box techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatments can be designed that significantly improve dose-volume characteristics over conventional treatment designs without costing unacceptable amounts of machine time. Further, deep intraabdominal sites can be adequately accessed and treated on intermediate energy machines with a relatively moderate increase in machine time.

Dose-volume histograms

A plot of a cumulative dose-volume frequency distribution, commonly known as a dose-volume histogram (DVH), graphically summarizes the simulated radiation distribution within a volume of interest of a patient which would result from a proposed radiation treatment plan. DVHs show promise as tools for comparing rival treatment plans for a specific patient by clearly presenting the uniformity of dose in the target volume and any hot spots in adjacent normal organs or tissues. However, because of the loss of positional information in the volume(s) under consideration, it should not be the sole criterion for plan evaluation. DVHs can also be used as input data to estimate tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). The sensitivity of TCP and NTCP calculations to small changes in the DVH shape points to the need for an accurate method for computing DVHs. We present a discussion of the methodology for generating and plotting the DVHs, some caveats, limitations on their use and the general experience of four hospitals using DVHs.

Numerical scoring of treatment plans

This is a report on numerical scoring techniques developed for the evaluation of treatment plans as part of a four-institution study of the role of 3-D planning in high energy external beam photon therapy. A formal evaluation process was developed in which plans were assessed by a clinician who displayed dose distributions in transverse, sagittal, coronal, and arbitrary oblique planes, viewed dose-volume histograms which summarized dose distributions to target volumes and the normal tissues of interest, and reviewed dose statistics which characterized the volume dose distribution for each plan. In addition, tumor control probabilities were calculated for each biological target volume and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated for each normal tissue defined in the agreed-upon protocols. To score a plan, the physician assigned a score for each normal tissue to reflect possible complications; for each target volume two separate scores were assigned, one representing the adequacy of tumor coverage, the second the likelihood of a complication. After scoring each target and normal tissue individually, two summary scores were given, one for target coverage, the second reflecting the impact on all normal tissues. Finally, each plan was given an overall rating (which could include a downgrading of the plan if the treatment was judged to be overly complex).