Adjuvant therapy with hepatic irradiation plus fluorouracil in colon carcinoma. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group

Medical Management of Colorectal Carcinomas

Current information on the medical treatment of colorectal cancer was reviewed after a search of the literature through Medline. Publications from 1984 to present were surveyed. Appropriate adjuvant therapy increases overall survival and disease-free intervals. The treatment modalities of unresectable or metastatic tumors are disappointing, with at best 40% of patients experiencing short-lasting responses. Whenever possible, patients with advanced colorectal cancer should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery. Although adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with stage III disease, there is uncertainty of such benefit in stage II colon cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to better define the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy for patients with stage II colon cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of adjuvant therapy on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Ovid MEDLINE (1986-2007), EMBASE (1980-2007), and EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( to 2007) were searched using the medical headings "colonic neoplasms", "colorectal neoplasms", "adjuvant chemotherapy", "adjuvant radiotherapy" and "immunotherapy", and the text words "colon cancer" and "colonic neoplasms". In addition, proceedings from the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology (1996 to 2004) as well as personal files were searched for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials or meta-analyses containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

:Three reviewers summarized the results of selected studies. The main outcomes of interest were overall and disease-free survival, however, data on toxicity and treatment delivery were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

With regards to the effect of adjuvant therapy on stage II colon cancer, the pooled relative risk ratio for overall survival was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.88, 1.05). With regards to disease-free survival, the pooled relative risk ratio was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.75, 0.92).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no improvement in overall survival in the pooled analysis, we did find that disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer was significantly better with the use of adjuvant therapy. It seems reasonable to discuss the benefits of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with those stage II patients who have high risk features, including obstruction, perforation, inadequate lymph node sampling or T4 disease. The co-morbidities and likelihood of tolerating adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should be considered as well. There exists a need to further define which high-risk features in stage II colon cancer patients should be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy. Also, researchers must continue to search for other therapies which might be more effective, shorter in duration and less toxic than those available today.

A pilot study of accelerated preoperative hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation with or without low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation (PLI) combined with preoperative accelerated hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation (HART) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2003 62 patients were enrolled: 38 (61%) received HART and 24 (39%) HART+PLI. The pelvis was irradiated twice a day, with a minimal interfraction interval of 6h: the total dose of 42 Gy was given in 1.5 Gy per fractions over 18 days. The PLI (14 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 1.4 Gy) was given simultaneously with the morning fraction of HART. Twenty patients (32%), including 7 in PLI group, received 5-Fu based postoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In general, acute normal tissue reactions appeared tolerable irrespectively of PLI. Six to twelve months after completion of combined therapy the mean ALAT levels in patients treated with HART alone (25 pts), HART+chemotherapy (13 pts), HART+PLI (17 pts), and HART+PLI+chemotherapy (7 pts) were 15, 21, 26 and 55 IU/l, respectively. A mild increase of ALAT levels observed in the HART+PLI+chemotherapy sub-group was non-symptomatic. Three-year actuarial loco-regional control rate in a group of 62 patients was 94%. None of the patients who received PLI developed metastases during the follow-up, compared to 10 out of 38 patients (26%) with no PLI. A difference in metastases-free survival in favor of HART+PLI can be, however, attributed to selection of patients for PLI who were in better general health and stage of disease than those treated with HART.

CONCLUSIONS

Further use of PLI may be limited due to asymptomatic, but detectable biochemical changes of liver function when PLI is sequentially combined with chemotherapy. HART, on the other hand, provides acceptable rate of local control, and is well tolerated, also when combined with postoperative chemotherapy.

Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy with or without elective irradiation of para-aortic nodes and liver in rectal cancer patients. A controlled clinical trial of the EORTC Radiotherapy Group

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this randomized multicenter study was to assess the impact on disease free and overall survival of low dose irradiation to para-aortic nodes and liver in patients with a locally advanced resected rectal cancer receiving a 50 Gy postoperative pelvic radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Main inclusion criteria were: a curative resection for a histologically proved carcinoma of the rectum, Gunderson-Sosin stages B2-B3, C1-C3, age <70 years. The patients were randomized between pelvic irradiation (Lim-XRT): 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks and extended irradiation (Ext-XRT): same scheme/doses in the pelvis and extended fields on para-aortic nodes and liver, delivering 25 Gy in 19 fractions over 25 days. From 1983 to 1992, 484 patients were enrolled by 18 EORTC institutions and 29 patients were ineligible. The end-points were local and distant relapses, toxicity and survival.

RESULTS

Compliance to treatment: 87.2% in Lim-XRT arm and 71.8% in Ext-XRT arm. Moderate acute hematological and hepatic toxicities were significantly increased in Ext-XRT arm. Among 325 patients at risk, 44 suffered a severe intestinal complication requiring surgery in 29. The 5- and 10-year estimates of disease free survival were respectively 42 and 31% in Lim-XRT arm and 47 and 31% in Ext-XRT arm (ns). The corresponding figures for overall survival were respectively 45 and 40% in Lim-XRT arm and 48 and 37% in Ext-arm (ns). The 10 years estimate of intra-pelvic failures was approximately 30% in both arms. Patients in Ext-arm appeared to have a slight shorter interval free of liver metastases (P=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Low dose irradiation to the para-aortic nodes and liver did not improve survival for patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

Early evaluation of abdominal/hepatic irradiation and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

To describe the toxicities of a combined modality adjuvant regimen for patients with resectable periampullary adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fourteen patients with surgically resected periampullary adenocarcinoma were treated with adjuvant therapy consisting of prophylactic hepatic irradiation and pancreatic bed irradiation and concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV). Starting within 60 days of surgery, patients received radiation treatments of 1.8 Gy per fraction to the liver and pancreatic bed (13 fractions), followed by 1.8 Gy per fraction to the pancreatic region (15 fractions). All radiation treatments were given with infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m2/day) and leucovorin (5 mg/m2/day) for 5 out of every 7 days during the 38-day treatment sequence. After a 1-month break, patients were scheduled to receive four cycles of infusional 5-FU/LV (2 weeks on/2 weeks off).

RESULTS

All 14 patients completed the initial combination treatment. Toxicities were tolerable; three patients had Grade 3/4 toxicities that were primarily gastrointestinal in nature. Six patients required hospitalization during therapy for treatment-related toxicities. Two patients required radiation treatment breaks of less than 1 week, and two others had radiation held for 2-4 weeks. Three patients required chemotherapy dose reductions secondary to toxicities. Toxicities in the subsequent chemotherapy-alone cycles were few and primarily manifested by Grade 2 rises in liver injury tests. Higher toxicity grades were associated with tumor progression. Twelve patients have developed recurrent disease with an equal number of recurrences occurring in the pancreatic bed as in the liver over the 12-month median follow-up. Median survival for this cohort is 417 days, not significantly different from previously reported adjuvant trials in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that adjuvant therapy with concomitant large-field radiation and infusional chemotherapy is feasible and associated with mangeable toxicities in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Improvement in survival over other adjuvant regimens has not thus far been observed. Modification of this strategy may be required.

Preoperative chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: excessive toxicity of prophylactic hepatic irradiation

PURPOSE

In an effort to reduce relapse in the liver and improve survival in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, we combined whole-liver irradiation with our standard preoperative chemoradiation regimen.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eleven patients with biopsy-proven, potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were treated with 50.4 Gy of external beam irradiation to the pancreas (1.8 Gy/day, 5 days/week) and concurrent continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 per day). The liver was treated with 23.4 Gy on Days 8 through 21 (13 fractions; 1.8 Gy/fraction). Patients, who upon restaging with radiography and computed tomography were considered to have resectable tumors, were subsequently taken to surgery. If, at surgery, tumors were resectable, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, and 10 Gy of intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy was delivered to the bed of the resected pancreas.

RESULTS

All 11 patients completed chemoradiation. Two treatment-related deaths occurred following chemoradiation, prompting premature termination of the study. Of seven patients taken to surgery, four underwent resection. Seven patients have died of disease, five with liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic hepatic chemoradiation, as given in this study, was associated with two treatment-related deaths and a higher than expected incidence of subsequent liver metastases. Our data do not support the use of this treatment program in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Whole abdominal radiotherapy and concomitant 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy in advanced colon cancer

PURPOSE

This analysis was undertaken to assess whole abdomen radiation therapy and concurrent 5-fluorouracil for toxicity and patterns of failure in high-risk colon cancer patients after curative surgical resection.

METHODS

Eighteen patients were treated adjuvantly after curative resection. Four patients (22 percent) had Stage B and 14 (78 percent) had Stage C disease. Histology was poorly differentiated in 4 (22 percent) and moderately differentiated in 14 (78 percent) patients. Four patients received whole abdominal radiation only, 30 Gy at 1 Gy/day. Fourteen patients had an additional locoregional boost of 9.6 to 16 Gy at 1.6 Gy/day. The liver received 19.8 Gy at 0.67 Gy/day. 5-Fluorouracil was given as a continuous infusion during therapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of three years, 6 of 18 (33 percent) patients have relapsed. Failure occurred locally in 3 of 18 (17 percent) and distantly in 4 of 18 patients (22 percent). Four of six (67 percent) failures occurred in the liver. The five-year actuarial survival and disease-free survival were 78 percent and 66 percent, respectively. Median elapsed time on radiotherapy was 73 days, with 5 of 18 patients (28 percent) requiring two or more weeks of unplanned treatment breaks. Acute Grade 3 to 4 toxicity (diarrhea, leukopenia) occurred in 3 of 18 patients (17 percent), with late complications (bowel obstruction) occurring in 2 of 18 patients (11 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole abdominal radiotherapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil appears to improve local control but not to prevent liver metastases. Significant toxicity resulted in frequent interruption of therapy and protracted its course. Whether this adjuvant regimen impacts on survival or offers an advantage over locoregional irradiation remains to be studied.

Accelerated hyperfractionated hepatic irradiation in the management of patients with liver metastases: results of the RTOG dose escalating protocol

PURPOSE

This study was prepared to address two objectives: (a) to determine whether progressively higher total doses of hepatic irradiation can prolong survival in a selected population of patients with liver metastases; (b) to refine existing concepts of liver tolerance for fractionated external radiation employing a fraction size which might be appropriate in clinical protocols evaluating elective or adjuvant radiation of the liver.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred seventy-three analyzable patients with computed tomography measurable liver metastases from primary cancers of the gastrointestinal tract were entered on a dose escalating protocol of twice daily hepatic irradiation employing fractions of 1.5 Gy separated by 4 hr or longer. Sequential groups of patients received 27 Gy, 30 Gy, and 33 Gy to the entire liver and were monitored for acute and late toxicities, survival, and cause of death. Dose escalation was implemented following survival of 10 patients at each dose level for a period of 6 months or longer without clinical or biochemical evidence of radiation hepatitis.

RESULTS

The use of progressively larger total doses of radiation did not prolong median survival or decrease the frequency with which liver metastases were the cause of death. None of 122 patients entered at the 27 Gy and 30 Gy dose levels revealed clinical or biochemical evidence of radiation induced liver injury. Five of 51 patients entered at the 33 Gy level revealed clinical or biochemical evidence of late liver injury with an actuarial risk of severe (Grade 3) radiation hepatitis of 10.0% (+/- 7.3% S.E.) at 6 months, resulting in closure of the study to patient entry.

CONCLUSION

The study design could not credibly establish a safe dose for hepatic irradiation, however, it did succeed in determining that 33 Gy in fractions of 1.5 Gy is unsafe, carrying a substantial risk of delayed radiation injury. The absence of apparent late liver injury at the 27 Gy and 30 Gy dose levels suggests that a prior clinical trial of adjuvant hepatic irradiation in patients with resected colon cancer may have employed an insufficient radiation dose (21 Gy) to fully test the question.