Quality assurance in stereotactic radiosurgery using a standard linear accelerator

Comparison of Different Head Tilt Angles in Tomotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) planning can present challenges. This study examines the influence of head tilt angles on the dosimetric characteristics of target and organs at risk (OARs), aiming to identify the optimal tilt angle that yields optimal dosimetric outcomes using tomotherapy (TOMO).

METHODS

Eight patients diagnosed with brain metastases underwent CT scans at five tilt angles: [0°, 10°), [10°, 20°), [20°, 30°), [30°, 40°), and [40°, 45°]. Treatment plans were generated using TOMO and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Dosimetric parameters including conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), D2cc, D98%, and Dmean of PTV, as well as Dmax, and Dmean of OARs were analyzed. Furthermore, a comparison was made between the dosimetric parameters of TOMO and VMAT plans. Finally, delivery efficiency of TOMO plans were assessed.

RESULTS

For the PTV, [40°, 45°] tilt angle demonstrated significantly better conformity, homogeneity, lower D2cc, and lower Dmean for the PTV. Regarding the OARs, the [40°, 45°] head tilt angle demonstrated significantly lower Dmax and Dmean in hippocampus, eyes, optic chiasm, and optic nerves. The [40°, 45°] tilt angle also showed significantly lower Dmax for brainstem and cochleas, as well as a lower Dmean for lens. In the [40°,45°] tilt angle for HA-WBRT, TOMO showed superior performance over VMAT for the PTV. TOMO achieved lower Dmax for brainstem, cochleas, optic nerves, and optic chiasm, as well as a lower Dmean for hippocampus. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between delivery time and the PTV projection length in the sagittal plane.

CONCLUSION

The TOMO plan utilizing a tilt angle range of [40°, 45°] demonstrated superior PTV conformity and uniformity, along with enhanced OARs sparing. Furthermore, it exhibited a dosimetric advantage over VMAT for PTV and most OARs at the same angle range.

Dosimetric impact of mechanical movements of the Linac gantry during treatments with small fields

Objective

Current accepted linac Quality Assurance (QA) guidelines used for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) suggest a mechanical isocentre tolerance level of 1 mm. However, this tolerance level has not been well-established for the specific case of small field stereotactic VMAT. This study aims to evaluate the clinical impact of mechanical uncertainty on this treatment modality by modelling systematic gantry sag derived isocentre variance in the Treatment Planning System (TPS).

Approach

A previously reported dataset of gantry sag values in the literature served as a starting point for this study. Using an in-house developed VMAT arc splitting algorithm, isocentre shifts were applied at a Control Point (CP) level to DICOM-RT treatment plans. Dose distributions for varying isocentre shift magnitudes were calculated for a set of 29 stereotactic VMAT plans using the Eclipse Acuros XB dose algorithm. These plans had a range of Planning Target Volume (PTV) sizes. A quantitative comparison of each plan was conducted by evaluating five Dose Volume Histogram (DVH)-derived plan quality metrics.

Results

All metrics exhibited a deterioration in plan quality with increasing magnitudes of isocentre shift. At small PTV sizes, these effects were amplified, exhibiting significant changes at 1 mm of average shift when typical targets and tolerances were considered. For plans with PTVs between 0 and 5 cm3, a 1 mm shift reduced PTV coverage by 6.6 ± 2.2% and caused a 12.1 ± 3.8% deterioration in the conformity index. Based on the results of this study, the prevalent tolerance of 1 mm may not be suitable for treatments of small PTVs with small fields.

Significance

In contrast to commonly accepted values, an absolute mechanical isocentre of 0.5 mm with action level at 0.75 mm is recommended for stereotactic VMAT of PTV sizes below 10 cm3.

Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments

Purpose

To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT).

Methods

Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (r_{eq_PTV}) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (r_{eq_Vi}, where V_i = V_10%, V_20% … V_120%). To evaluate the model’s predictability, a fourfold cross‐validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V_50%. The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., ΔGM = GM_pred − GM_clin and fractional ΔV_50% = (V_50%pred − V_50%clin)/V_50%clin) and a coefficient of determination, R². Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency.

Results

Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross‐validation was only 0.36 ± 0.06 mm for ΔGM, and 0.12 ± 0.08 for ΔV_50%. The R² for the linear fit between r_{eq_PTV} and r_{eq_vi} was 0.985 ± 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V_10% to V_120%; particularly, R² = 0.995 for V_50% and R² = 0.997 for V_100%. Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 ± 0.15 to 1.15 ± 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner’s intervention.

Conclusion

We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency.

An open-source platform for interactive collision prevention in photon and particle beam therapy treatment planning

We present an open-source platform to aid medical dosimetrists in preventing collisions between gantry head and patient or couch during photon or particle beam therapy treatment planning. This generic framework uses the native scripting interface of the particular planning software to import STL files of the treatment machine elements. These are visualized in 3D together with the contoured or scanned patient surface. A graphical dialog with sliders allows the interactive rotation of the gantry and couch, with real-time feedback. To prevent a future replanning, treatment planners can assess in advance and exclude beam angles resulting in a potential risk of collision. The software platform is publicly available on GitHub and has been validated for RayStation with actual patient plans. Furthermore, the incorporation of the complete patient geometry was tested with a 3D surface scan of a full-body phantom performed with a handheld smartphone. With this study, we aim at minimizing the risk of replanning due to collisions and thus of treatment delays and unscheduled consumption of manpower. The clinical workflow can be streamlined at no cost already at the treatment planning stage. By ensuring a real-time verification of the plan feasibility, the script might boost the use of optimal couch angles that a planner might shy away from otherwise.

On the selection of gantry and collimator angles for isocenter localization using Winston-Lutz tests

In Winston-Lutz (WL) tests, the isocenter of a linear accelerator (linac) is determined as the intersection of radiation central axes (CAX) from multiple gantry, collimator, and couch angles. It is well known that the CAX can wobble due to mechanical imperfections of the linac. Previous studies suggested that the wobble varies with gantry and collimator angles. Therefore, the isocenter determined in the WL tests has a profound dependence on the gantry and collimator angles at which CAX are sampled. In this study, we evaluated the systematic and random errors in the iso-centers determined with different CAX sampling schemes. Digital WL tests were performed on six linacs. For each WL test, 63 CAX were sampled at nine gantry angles and seven collimator angles. Subsets of these data were used to simulate the effects of various CAX sampling schemes. An isocenter was calculated from each subset of CAX and compared against the reference isocenter, which was calculated from 48 opposing CAX. The differences between the calculated isocenters and the reference isocenters ranged from 0 to 0.8 mm. The differences diminished to less than 0.2 mm when 24 or more CAX were sampled. Isocenters determined with collimator 0° were vertically lower than those determined with collimator 90° and 270°. Isocenter localization errors in the longitudinal direction (along the axis of gantry rotation) showed a strong dependence on the collimator angle selected. The errors in all directions were significantly reduced when opposing collimator angles and opposing gantry angles were employed. The isocenter localization errors were less than 0.2 mm with the common CAX sampling scheme, which used four cardinal gantry angles and two opposing collimator angles. Reproducibility stud-ies on one linac showed that the mean and maximum variations of CAX during the WL tests were 0.053 mm and 0.30 mm, respectively. The maximal variation in the resulting isocenters was 0.068 mm if 48 CAX were used, or 0.13 mm if four CAX were used. Quantitative results from this study are useful for understanding and minimizing the isocenter uncertainty in WL tests.

American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Practice Guideline for the Performance of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)

American College of Radiology and American Society for Radiation Oncology Practice Guideline for the Performance of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). SRS is a safe and efficacious treatment option of a variety of benign and malignant disorders involving intracranial structures and selected extracranial lesions. SRS involves a high dose of ionizing radiation with a high degree of precision and spatial accuracy. A quality SRS program requires a multidisciplinary team involved in the patient management. Organization, appropriate staffing, and careful adherence to detail and to established SRS standards is important to ensure operational efficiency and to improve the likelihood of procedural success. A collaborative effort of the American College of Radiology and American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology has produced a practice guideline for SRS. The guideline defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all the involved personnel, including the radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, and qualified medical physicist. Quality assurance is essential for safe and accurate delivery of treatment with SRS. Quality assurance issues for the treatment unit, stereotactic accessories, medical imaging, and treatment-planning system are presented and discussed. Adherence to these practice guidelines can be part of ensuring quality and patient safety in a successful SRS program.

[Comparison of image distortion between three magnetic resonance imaging systems of different magnetic field strengths for use in stereotactic irradiation of brain]

In this study, we evaluated the image distortion of three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems with magnetic field strengths of 0.4 T, 1.5 T and 3 T, during stereotactic irradiation of the brain. A quality assurance phantom for MRI image distortion in radiosurgery was used for these measurements of image distortion. Images were obtained from a 0.4-T MRI (APERTO Eterna, HITACHI), a 1.5-T MRI (Signa HDxt, GE Healthcare) and a 3-T MRI (Signa HDx 3.0 T, GE Healthcare) system. Imaging sequences for the 0.4-T and 3-T MRI were based on the 1.5-T MRI sequence used for stereotactic irradiation in the clinical setting. The same phantom was scanned using a computed tomography (CT) system (Aquilion L/B, Toshiba) as the standard. The results showed mean errors in the Z direction to be the least satisfactory of all the directions in all results. The mean error in the Z direction for 1.5-T MRI at －110 mm in the axial plane showed the largest error of 4.0 mm. The maximum errors for the 0.4-T and 3-T MRI were 1.7 mm and 2.8 mm, respectively. The errors in the plane were not uniform and did not show linearity, suggesting that simple distortion correction using outside markers is unlikely to be effective. The 0.4-T MRI showed the lowest image distortion of the three. However, other items, such as image noise, contrast and study duration need to be evaluated in MRI systems when applying frameless stereotactic irradiation.

A simple method to quantify the coincidence between portal image graticules and radiation field centers or radiation isocenter

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a computerized method to quantify the coincidence between portal image graticules and radiation field centers or radiation isocenter. Three types of graticules were included in this study: Megavoltage (MV) mechanical graticule, MV electronic portal imaging device digital graticule, and kilovoltage (kV) on-board imaging digital graticule.

METHODS

A metal ball bearing (BB) was imaged with MV and kV x-ray beams in a procedure similar to a Winston-Lutz test. The radiation fields, graticules, and BB were localized in eight portal images using Hough transform-based computer algorithms. The center of the BB served as a static reference point in the 3D space so that the distances between the graticule centers and the radiation field centers were calculated. The radiation isocenter was determined from the radiation field centers at different gantry angles.

RESULTS

Misalignments of MV and kV portal imaging graticules varied with the gantry or x-ray source angle as a result of mechanical imperfections of the linear accelerator and its imaging system. While the three graticules in this study were aligned to the radiation field centers and the radiation isocenter within 2.0 mm, misalignments of 1.5-2.0 mm were found at certain gantry angles. These misalignments were highly reproducible with the gantry rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple method was developed to quantify the alignments of portal image graticules directly against the radiation field centers or the radiation isocenter. The advantage of this method is that it does not require the BB to be placed exactly at the radiation isocenter through a precalibrated surrogating device such as room lasers or light field crosshairs. The present method is useful for radiation therapy modalities that require high-precision portal imaging such as image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy.

Linear accelerator and gamma knife-based stereotactic cranial radiosurgery: challenges and successes of existing quality assurance guidelines and paradigms

Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery has been practiced since 1951. The technique has expanded from a single dedicated unit in Stockholm in 1968 to hundreds of centers performing an estimated 100,000 Gamma Knife and linear accelerator cases in 2005. The radiation dosimetry of small photon fields used in this technique has been well explored in the past 15 years. Quality assurance recommendations have been promulgated in refereed reports and by several national and international professional societies since 1991. The field has survived several reported treatment errors and incidents, generally reacting by strengthening standards and precautions. An increasing number of computer-controlled and robotic-dedicated treatment units are expanding the field and putting patients at risk of unforeseen errors. Revisions and updates to previously published quality assurance documents, and especially to radiation dosimetry protocols, are now needed to ensure continued successful procedures that minimize the risk of serious errors.

TG-69: Radiographic film for megavoltage beam dosimetry

TG-69 is a task group report of the AAPM on the use of radiographic film for dosimetry. Radiographic films have been used for radiation dosimetry since the discovery of x-rays and have become an integral part of dose verification for both routine quality assurance and for complex treatments such as soft wedges (dynamic and virtual), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), image guided radiation therapy (IGRT), and small field dosimetry like stereotactic radiosurgery. Film is convenient to use, spatially accurate, and provides a permanent record of the integrated two dimensional dose distributions. However, there are several challenges to obtaining high quality dosimetric results with film, namely, the dependence of optical density on photon energy, field size, depth, film batch sensitivity differences, film orientation, processing conditions, and scanner performance. Prior to the clinical implementation of a film dosimetry program, the film, processor, and scanner need to be tested to characterize them with respect to these variables. Also, the physicist must understand the basic characteristics of all components of film dosimetry systems. The primary mission of this task group report is to provide guidelines for film selection, irradiation, processing, scanning, and interpretation to allow the physicist to accurately and precisely measure dose with film. Additionally, we present the basic principles and characteristics of film, processors, and scanners. Procedural recommendations are made for each of the steps required for film dosimetry and guidance is given regarding expected levels of accuracy. Finally, some clinical applications of film dosimetry are discussed.

Impact of target point deviations on control and complication probabilities in stereotactic radiosurgery of AVMs and metastases

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the impact of inaccuracies in the determination and setup of the target point in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on the expectable complication and control probabilities.

METHODS

Two randomized samples of patients with arteriovenous malformation (AVM) (n=20) and with brain metastases (n=20) treated with SRS were formed, and the probability for complete obliteration (COP) or complete remission (CRP), the size of the 10 Gy-volume in the brain tissue (VOI10), and the probability for radiation necrosis (NTCP) were calculated. The dose-effect relations for COP and CRP were fitted to clinical data. Target point deviations were simulated through random vectors and the resulting probabilities and volumes were calculated and compared with the values of the treatment plan.

RESULTS

The decrease of the relative value of the control probabilities at 1mm target point deviation was up to 4% for AVMs and up to 10% for metastases. At 2 mm the median decrease was 5% for AVMs and 9% for metastases. The value for the target point deviation, at which COP and CRP decreased about 0.05 in 90% of the cases, was 1.3 mm. The increase of NTCP was maximally 0.0025 per mm target point deviation for AVMs and 0.0035/mm for metastases. The maximal increase of VOI10 was 0.7 cm(3)/mm target point deviation in both patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The upper limit for tolerable target point deviations is at 1.3mm. If this value cannot be achieved during the system test, a supplementary safety margin should be applied for the definition of the target volume. A better accuracy level is desirable, in order to ensure optimal chances for the success of the treatment. The target point precision is less important for the minimization of the probability of radiation necroses.

An MLC-based linac QA procedure for the characterization of radiation isocenter and room lasers’ position

We have designed and implemented a new stereotactic linac QA test with stereotactic precision. The test is used to characterize gantry sag, couch wobble, cone placement, MLC offsets, and room lasers' positions relative to the radiation isocenter. Two MLC star patterns, a cone pattern, and the laser line patterns are recorded on the same imaging medium. Phosphor plates are used as imaging medium due to their sensitivity to red light. The red light of room lasers erases some of the irradiation information stored on the phosphor plates enabling accurate and direct measurements for the position of room lasers and radiation isocenter. Using film instead of the phosphor plate as imaging medium is possible, however, it is less practical. The QA method consists of irradiating four phosphor plates that record the gantry sag between the 0 degrees and 180 degrees gantry angles, the position and stability of couch rotational axis, the sag between the 90 degrees and 270 degrees gantry angles, the accuracy of cone placement on the collimator, the MLC offsets from the collimator rotational axis, and the position of laser lines relative to the radiation isocenter. The estimated accuracy of the method is +/- 0.2 mm. The observed reproducibility of the method is about +/- 0.1 mm. The total irradiation/ illumination time is about 10 min per image. Data analysis, including the phosphor plate scanning, takes less than 5 min for each image. The method characterizes the radiation isocenter geometry with the high accuracy required for the stereotactic radiosurgery. In this respect, it is similar to the standard ball test for stereotactic machines. However, due to the usage of the MLC instead of the cross-hair/ball, it does not depend on the cross-hair/ball placement errors with respect to the lasers and it provides more information on the mechanical integrity of the linac/couch/laser system. Alternatively, it can be used as a highly accurate QA procedure for the nonstereotactic machines. Noteworthy is its ability to characterize the MLC position accuracy, which is an important factor in IMRT delivery.

Development of head docking device for linac-based radiosurgery with a Neptun 10 PC linac

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a method for focused irradiation of intracranial lesions. Linac-based radiosurgery is currently performed by two techniques: couch mounted and pedestal mounted. In the first technique a device is required to affix the patient's head to the couch and neoreover to translate it accurately. Structure of such a device constructed by the authors plus acceptance test performed for evaluation is described in the article. A head docking device has been designed and constructed according to geometry of linac's couch and also desired functions. The device is cornpletely made from aluminum and consists of four major components: attachment bar, lower structure with four moveing accuracy mechanical stability and isocentric accuracy were assessed in the frame of acceptance test. Translating accuracy, mechanical stability and isocentric accuracy were found to be respectively: 1 mm, 1.64 mm and 3.2 mm with accuracy of 95%. According to AAPM report no. 54, a head docking device should translate head with an accuracy of 1 mm; this recommendation has been met. Moreover, we have demonstrated that the isocentric accuracy and mechanical stability of the device are sufficient that the device on confidently be used in stereotactic treatment.

Introducing a system for automated control of rotation axes, collimator and laser adjustment for a medical linear accelerator

Mechanical stability and precise adjustment of rotation axes, collimator and room lasers are essential for the success of radiotherapy and particularly stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator. Quality assurance procedures, at present mainly based on visual tests and radiographic film evaluations, should desirably be little time consuming and highly accurate. We present a method based on segmentation and analysis of digital images acquired with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) that meets these objectives. The method can be employed for routine quality assurance with a square field formed by the built-in collimator jaws as well as with a circular field using an external drill hole collimator. A number of tests, performed to evaluate accuracy and reproducibility of the algorithm, yielded very satisfying results. Studies performed over a period of 18 months prove the applicability of the inspected accelerator for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Risk analysis of Leksell Gamma Knife Model C with automatic positioning system

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the decrease in risk from misadministration of the new Leksell Gamma Knife Model C with Automatic Positioning System compared with previous models.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Elekta Instruments, A.B. of Stockholm has introduced a new computer-controlled Leksell Gamma Knife Model C which uses motor-driven trunnions to reposition the patient between isocenters (shots) without human intervention. Previous models required the operators to manually set coordinates from a printed list, permitting opportunities for coordinate transposition, incorrect helmet size, incorrect treatment times, missing shots, or repeated shots.

RESULTS

A risk analysis was conducted between craniotomy involving hospital admission and outpatient Gamma Knife radiosurgery. A report of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies dated November 29, 1999 estimated that medical errors kill between 44,000 and 98,000 people each year in the United States. Another report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System estimates that 2.1 million nosocomial infections occur annually in the United States in acute care hospitals alone, with 31 million total admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

All medical procedures have attendant risks of morbidity and possibly mortality. Each patient should be counseled as to the risk of adverse effects as well as the likelihood of good results for alternative treatment strategies. This paper seeks to fill a gap in the existing medical literature, which has a paucity of data involving risk estimates for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Radiosurgery in the management of pediatric brain tumors

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcome of pediatric brain tumor patients following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and factors associated with progression-free survival.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcome of 90 children treated with SRS for recurrent (n = 62) or residual (n = 28) brain tumors over a 10-year period. Median follow-up from SRS was 24 months for all patients and 55.5 months for the 34 patients currently alive.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 13 months. Median PFS according to tumor histology was medulloblastoma = 11 months, ependymoma = 8.5 months, glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma = 12 months. Median PFS in patients treated to a single lesion was 15.4 months. No patient undergoing SRS to more than 1 lesion survived disease free beyond 2 years. After adjusting for histology and other clinical factors, SRS for tumor recurrence (RR = 2.49) and the presence of > 1 lesion (RR = 2.3) were associated with a significantly increased rate of progression (p < 0.05). Three-year actuarial local control (LC) was as follows: medulloblastoma = 57%, ependymoma = 29%, anaplastic astrocytoma/glioblastoma = 60%, other histologies = 56%. Nineteen patients with radionecrosis and progressive neurologic symptoms underwent reoperation after an interval of 0.6-62 months following SRS. Pathology revealed necrosis with no evidence of tumor in 9 of these cases.

CONCLUSION

SRS can be given safely to selected children with brain tumors. SRS appears to reduce the proportion of first failures occurring locally and is associated with better outcome when given as a part of initial management. Some patients with unresectable relapsed disease can be salvaged with SRS. SRS to multiple lesions does not appear to be curative. Serious neurologic symptoms requiring reoperation is infrequently caused by radionecrosis alone.

Dosimetria dos cones radiocirúrgicos Radionics de diâmetros de 5 mm a 50 mm para um feixe de 6 MV de um acelerador linear Mevatron MD digital

Os parâmetros dosimétricos de um feixe de raios X de pequeno diâmetro para um sistema de radiocirurgia comercial foram medidos em água com um detector de diodo de Si do tipo p. As razões tecido-máximo, o fator de espalhamento total e os perfis dos feixes a profundidades de 5 e 10 cm foram medidos para 17 feixes de diâmetros circulares de 5 mm a 50 mm, em incrementos de 2,5 mm. Os fatores de espalhamento totais caíram lentamente, de 0,947 para 0,888 entre os cones de 50 mm e 12,5 mm de diâmetro (variação de 7%); para os cones entre 10 mm e 5 mm de diâmetro, esta queda foi bem maior, de 0,854 para 0,666 (variação de 28%). Os valores obtidos para a relação tecido-máximo são consistentes com dados publicados. Os perfis dos feixes foram medidos nas direções x e y, e estão dentro de 0,2 mm para todos os cones entre as duas direções. A medida da largura à meia-altura se encontra dentro de 1 mm com o diâmetro nominal dos cones.

Repositioning accuracy with the Laitinen frame for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in adult and pediatric brain tumors: preliminary report

PURPOSE

To determine the repositioning accuracy, patient tolerance, and clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiation therapy for brain tumors in children and adults performed with the Laitinen stereotactic localizer and head holder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, stereotactic frame tolerance was assessed by recording patient discomfort or pain in the ear and nose during each treatment in 34 patients, including 21 children and 13 adults with 37 lesions treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. Radiation doses ranged from 10-60 Gy at 1.0-4.0 Gy per fraction. Repositioning accuracy was assessed by comparing portal radiographs with setup fields on computed tomographic (CT) scout images. Clinical efficacy was assessed by analyzing posttreatment CT and magnetic resonance images.

RESULTS

The stereotactic localizer was well tolerated. The mean isocenter shifts observed after studying 305 portal radiographs were x-coordinate shift of 1.0 mm +/- 0.7 (SD), y-coordinate shift of 0.8 mm +/- 0.8, and z-coordinate shift of 1.7 mm +/- 1.0. At a median follow-up of 16 months, local control was achieved in 18 of 22 primary and in one of eight of recurrent tumors.

CONCLUSION

The Laitinen stereotactic localizer is well tolerated with accurate reproducibility during stereotactic radiation therapy. Preliminary local control rates are consistent with those in other reports.

On isocentre adjustment and quality control in linear accelerator based radiosurgery with circular collimators and room lasers

We have developed a densitometric method for measuring the isocentric accuracy and the accuracy of marking the isocentre position for linear accelerator based radiosurgery with circular collimators and room lasers. Isocentric shots are used to determine the accuracy of marking the isocentre position with room lasers and star shots are used to determine the wobble of the gantry and table rotation movement, the effect of gantry sag, the stereotactic collimator alignment, and the minimal distance between gantry and table rotation axes. Since the method is based on densitometric measurements, beam spot stability is implicitly tested. The method developed is also suitable for quality assurance and has proved to be useful in optimizing isocentric accuracy. The method is simple to perform and only requires a film box and film scanner for instrumentation. Thus, the method has the potential to become widely available and may therefore be useful in standardizing the description of linear accelerator based radiosurgical systems.

Assessment of the uncertainties in dose delivery of a commercial system for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was introduced in our department in 1992, and since then, more than 200 patients have been treated with this method. An in-house-developed algorithm for target localization and dose calculation has recently been replaced with a commercially available system. In this study, both systems have been compared, and positional accuracy, as well as dose calculation, have been verified experimentally.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The in-house-developed software for target localization and dose calculation is an extension to George Sherouse's GRATIS(R) software for radiotherapy treatment planning, and has been replaced by a commercial (BrainSCAN version 3.1; BrainLAB, Germany) treatment planning system (TPS) for SRS. The positional accuracy for the entire SRS procedure (from image acquisition to treatment) has been investigated by treatment of simulated targets in the form of 0.2-cm lead beads inserted into an anthropomorphic phantom. Both dose calculation algorithms have been verified against manual calculations (based on basic beam data and CT data from phantom and patients), and measurements with the anthropomorphic phantom applying ionization chamber, thermoluminescent detectors, and radiographic film. This analysis has been performed on a variety of experimental situations, starting with static beams and simple one-arc treatments, to more complex and clinical relevant applications. Finally, 11 patients have been evaluated with both TPS in parallel for comparison and continuity of clinical experience.

RESULTS

Phantom studies evaluating the entire SRS procedure have shown that a target, localized by CT, can be irradiated with a positional accuracy of 0.08 cm in any direction with 95% confidence. Neglecting the influence of dose perturbation when the beam passes through bone tissue or air cavities, the calculated dose values obtained from both TPSs agreed within 1% (SD 1%) for phantom and patient studies. The application of a one-dimensional path length correction for tissue heterogeneity influences the treatment prescription 4% on average (SD 1%), which is in compliance with theoretical predictions. The phantom measurements confirmed the predicted dose at isocenter within uncertainty for the different treatment schedules in this study.

CONCLUSION

The full SRS procedure applied to an anthropomorphic phantom has been used as a comprehensive method to assess the uncertainties involved in dose delivery and target positioning. The results obtained with both TPSs are in agreement with AAPM Report 54, TG 42 and clinical continuity is assured. However, the use of a one-dimensional path length correction will result in an increase of 4% in dose prescription, which is slightly more than that predicted in the literature.

A simple and accurate coordinate transformation for a stereotactic radiotherapy system

A global registration algorithm using only two CT slices was developed to transform target points known in the Brown-Roberts-Wells frame back to a CT-simulator coordinate system. The algorithm uses exact solutions to determine all of the points of interest based on BRW pins in the two CT-slices. In comparison with the algorithms based on individual slices, there is no requirement of digitization of BRW pins in every CT slice. There is no approximation (or linear interpolation) for determination of the target points that fell in between two CT slices. Results in 60 clinical cases demonstrate that the accuracy and precision of the isocentric positions are within the digitization uncertainty. Application of this global image registration can simplify the coordinate transformation in stereotactic radiation therapy.

Stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy for meningiomas

PURPOSE

Stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy, (SCRT) is a high precision technique of conformal radiotherapy (RT) which reduces the volume of normal tissue irradiated compared to conventional RT and may lead to a reduction in long-term toxicity We describe the technique and the preliminary results in patients with inoperable, residual or recurrent meningiomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From July 1993 to November 1997, 24 patients (median age: 56 years, range: 28-72) with base of skull (n = 21). falx or upper skull (n = 3) meningiomas were treated with SCRT. The technique employed immobilization in a Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame and CT localization with a Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) fiducial system for stereotactic space definition. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as gross tumour volume (GTV) and a 0.5-1 cm margin. Treatment was delivered with three (12 patients) or four non-coplanar conformal fixed fields (12 patients) Conformal blocking was achieved either with lead alloy blocks (n = 11) or with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) (n = 13). Patients were treated on a 6 MV linear accelerator to doses of 50-55 Gy, in 30-33 daily fractions. The treatments were carried out as part of a routine work of a busy radiotherapy department.

RESULTS

Median GTV for 24 meningiomas was 21.7 cm3 (range: 4.4-183 cm3). SCRT was well tolerated with minimal toxicity Three months after the end of radiotherapy, seven of 15 patients with neurological deficit had an improvement and eight remained unchanged. Two patients experienced early side effects (one VII nerve palsy, one Addisonian state). At a median follow-up of 13-months (range: 3-43) the 1 year progression free survival and overall survival are 100%. which is within the range expected for conventional fractionated radiotherapy for meningiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

SCRT is a feasible technique of high precision conformal RT for patients with meningiomas. Potential advantages in tumour control, survival and toxicity over conventional RT, require evaluation in long-term prospective studies.

A simple method to verify in vivo the accuracy of target coordinates in linear accelerator radiosurgery

PURPOSE

A simple method that verifies the coincidence of the isocenter with the center of the target volume in radiosurgery treatment conditions is described. The accuracy is compared to that of accepted computerized procedures employing fiducial markers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The center of the beam is identified by a cylindrical localizer, fixed to the plate of the supplemental collimator, with a 2 x 50 mm tungsten rod coincident with the beam axis and is projected onto the x-ray portal verification films. Prior to irradiation, the coordinates of the intersection of the beams axes, which is in a known spatial relationship with the isocenter, are read directly on portal x-ray films and their coincidence with the coordinates set during patient positioning, is checked.

RESULTS

The mean displacement in AP, Lat, and Vert coordinates respectively, over 84 patients, between the coordinates calculated by the computerized procedure employing fiducial markers and the coordinates calculated by using the rulers was 0.3 +/- 0.4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results obtained with the two methods we can conclude that rulers method can be used as a fast indirect control of the position of the radiation isocenter. Moreover, the dimensions of the radiation field and the correct alignment of the tertiary circular collimator can be also documented.

Verification of radiosurgery target point alignment with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)

A procedure has been developed using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to verify that the center of a patient's lesion is aligned with the center of a treatment cone prior to treatment in a linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery procedure. The coordinates of the lesion center are set on the Brown-Roberts-Wells phantom base using a target simulator. A 3 mm tungsten ball, mounted on the target simulator, is used as the reference point for the planned isocenter. The target simulator is then attached to an adapter mounted on the linac couch, and an EPID image of the simulated target is acquired. The center of the circular-shaped radiation field is calculated from the centroid of the segmented EPID image, and the center of the tungsten ball is identified by an automated computer search algorithm. A summation filter is used to find the position of the lowest radiation intensity coincident with the center of the ball. The alignment error is defined as the difference between the center of the radiation field and the center of the ball. The accuracy of this method was tested and found to be within 0.2 mm. The advantage of the EPID-based procedure is that it can give quantitative offset values quickly for immediate readjustment. We have found that the method is also a convenient tool for testing room laser alignment and the accuracy of the treatment cones.

Analyses of multi-irradiation film for system alignments in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and radiosurgery (SRS)

In stereotactic radiosurgery, a seven-irradiation film was used to define any discrepancy between the beam and target centres. A mathematical model based on the linac alignment and target set-up was developed to diagnose the discrepancies of the seven-irradiation film between the beam and simulation target centres. From the measured data of the multi-irradiation film, this mathematical model leads to five parameters in seven equations. Twin computer codes were employed to solve the five parameters from the seven equations. By feeding the discrepancy data into the two computer codes, the sources of the target-to-beam discrepancy were revealed. From these decoded sources, the target coordinates were adjusted and then the seven-irradiation film procedure was repeated. This discrepancy thus obtained was found to be drastically reduced. Some decoded parameters were consistently verified by direct measurements. This demonstrates that the present mathematical model and computer code do reveal the causes of the target-to-beam misalignment and gantry sag. In a further effort to test the feasibility of the mathematical model and the computer codes, the target's lateral coordinate was deliberately offset by 1.5 mm and then another seven-irradiation film was taken. By inserting these discrepancies into the computer codes, it was found that the deviation was consistent with the intentional offset. In addition, the mathematical model and computer codes are applicable to any multi-irradiation technique.

Use of a 1 mm collimator to test the accuracy of stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To develop a method of measuring locations of the center of dose in stereotactic radiotherapy relative to the center of the target, and thereby obtain a test of the accuracy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An insert was mounted in an SRT collimator on a 6 MV linear accelerator to provide a photon beam approximately 1 mm in diameter at isocenter, and a method of measuring radiation center coordinates of arced SRT beams. To simulate a small intracranial target, two halves of a Barium paste column were embedded in two adjacent slabs of a humanoid phantom. A film was placed between the slabs to image the radiation relative to the target center. A surgical head ring and computerized tomography (CT) localizer were attached to the phantom and CT scans were obtained. The scans were entered in a three-dimensional computerized treatment-planning system and radiation isocenter coordinates determined by iteratively moving the 90% isodose surface center of arced beam dose distributions to coincide with the target center. The phantom was bolted to an SRT floorstand with isocenter coordinates obtained from the treatment plan, and then irradiated in two sets of experiments. The first set applied five 1 mm noncoplanar arced beams with and without offsets of the planned coordinates in the transverse plane. The second set applied one large transverse arc coplanar to the film with and without offsets in the craniocaudal direction. Irradiations with coordinate offsets tested the sensitivity of the method. Films were developed and digitized with a high resolution film scanner to measure the location of the radiation relative to the target center.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The radiation center was found from 0.0 to 0.3 mm of the target center, within requirements of our clinical quality assurance program. The measurement and evaluation of coincidence of radiation and target centers are, thus, proposed as elements of radiosurgery facility acceptance and annual quality assurance.

The measurement of linear accelerator isocenter motion using a three-micrometer device and an adjustable pointer

PURPOSE

The small motions of the major axes of a linear accelerator observed during gantry and treatment table rotation were measured to improve beam-target alignment during stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Measurements of gantry isocenter motion and table rotational axis wobble were performed with an adjustable front pointer and a three-micrometer device. Nominal gantry and table isocenters were specified. The gantry motion path and table isocenter coordinates were then applied to offset simulated treatment target coordinates so as to compensate for gantry sag. Target simulation films were examined to document improvement of beam-target alignment.

RESULTS

The overall precision of the measurement of gantry and table isocenter coordinates was 0.2 mm. Over gantry rotation of 0 to 360 degrees, the gantry isocenter was found to follow a pinched loop with a maximum point to point distance of 1 mm. Table axis motion was found to be negligible relative to the reproducibility of gantry isocenter motion. Thus, a table isocenter was defined that was invariant to table rotation.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that the three-micrometer device and adjustable front pointer are useful tools for three-dimensional (3D) mapping of gantry, collimator and table isocenters and their motions. It is suggested that such measurements may be useful in the quality assurance of linear accelerators, particularly to improve beam-target alignment during SRS and other high dose external beam therapy.

[Quality assurance in protontherapy: a systematic approach in progress at Orsay]

The degree of accuracy and reliability required in proton therapy can only be guaranteed if a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) programme is established. Such a programme obviously has common features with general QA in radiotherapy, but some aspects are specific to the use of protons and particularly to the characteristics of each facility. A study is in progress at Orsay to convert a series of quality controls into a systematic quality assurance programme. It includes some basic steps on organisation, setting up a QA committee and QA task groups, organising meetings, policies, procedures, records, qualifications, and determining some examples of tolerance in controls. Among some critical and specific points identified in this process are the combined treatment with photons at different institutions, the specificity of a non-hospital-based and complex facility, the high degree of precision required for the patient setup, and the need to develop in-house basic tools such as the treatment planning system. The inclusion of all the patients in prospective well-defined clinical trials, the comparison with alternative techniques and the radiobiological studies are considered as fundamentals for the QA programme. Present dosimetric and radiobiological intercomparisons between protontherapy centres are considered as partial audits. A study is in progress to establish common dosimetric and clinical protocols, radiobiological models and dose and volume specifications. In spite of the differences between the existing facilities, it should also be possible to obtain international consensus on general guidelines for a QA programme in proton therapy.

Characteristics of a dedicated linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery-radiotherapy unit

A stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) system on a dedicated Varian Clinac-600SR linear accelerator with Brown-Roberts-Wells and Gill-Thomas-Cosman relocatable frames along with the Radionics (RSA) planning system is evaluated. The Clinac-600SR has a single 6-MV beam with the same beam characteristics as that of the mother unit, the Clinac-600C. The primary collimator is a fixed cone projecting to a 10-cm diameter at isocenter. The secondary collimator is a heavily shielded cylindrical collimator attached to the face plate of the primary collimator. The tertiary collimation consists of the actual treatment cones. The cone sizes vary from 12.5 to 40.0 mm diameter. The mechanical stability of the entire system was verified. The variations in isocenter position with table, gantry, and collimator rotation were found to be < 0.5 mm with a compounded accuracy of < or = 1.0 mm. The radiation leakage under the cones was < 1% measured at a depth of 5 cm in a phantom. The beam profiles of all cones in the x and y directions were within +/- 0.5 mm and match with the physical size of the cone. The dosimetric data such as tissue maximum ratio, off-axis ratio, and cone factor were taken using film, diamond detector, and ion chambers. The mechanical and dosimetric characteristics including dose linearity of this unit are presented and found to be suitable for SRS/SRT. The difficulty in absolute dose measurement for small cone is discussed.

Quality assurance for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

This quality assurance program is designed for stereotactic radiosurgical units, gamma knife, to check and maintain the unit to preclude accidents and comply with current regulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over 58 stereotactic radiosurgical units using 201 focused 60Co beams have been installed in the last 7 years and are in use at hospitals throughout the world, with at least 11 additional units being prepared to come on-line in the next year. This system has been in use at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) for 7 years. A comprehensive quality assurance program has been developed. It includes the physics and dosimetry parameters and safety checks required by regulatory agencies. The program, based on over 7 years of experience in measurements, and used during the treatment of over 1500 patients, is separated into three aspects, namely physics, dosimetry, and safety. The UPMC program hopefully will indicate out-of-tolerance problems. Some quality assurance items are checked on a daily basis prior to patient treatment, while other aspects are checked on a weekly, monthly, and/or annual basis. A complete list of items with their respective time tables and tolerances is provided.

RESULTS

Although experience shows very small margins of error, larger values were chosen to account for variations in equipment and techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Items included in this quality assurance program should indicate and/or preclude problems encountered in the use of this unit.

Maintaining accuracy in stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

To provide the manufacture's specification for the base phantom of a commercially available stereotactic radiosurgery system so that its accuracy can be confirmed, and to describe a calibration device that allows the accuracy of the base phantom to be verified quickly and on a routine basis. Modifications to the target pointer system that make matching the pointer tips easier and less likely to damage the pointer tips are also described.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In stereotactic radiosurgery, spatial accuracy is the key factor for successful dose delivery. With some commercially available systems, this accuracy depends on the accuracy of the base phantom coordinate system, how closely the tip of the target pointer can be matched to the tip of the base phantom pointer, and how accurately the coordinates set on the isocentric subsystem match those set on the base phantom. Two major problems, usually overlooked when evaluating system accuracy are, first, the base phantom, which establishes the stereotactic coordinate system, is assumed to be completely accurate. This is a dangerous assumption because the base phantom is used frequently for routine patient treatments and for standard quality assurance tests. To exacerbate the problem, no independent device is provided with stereotactic systems to check the accuracy of the base phantom. Second, the accuracy of the isocenter coordinates set on the head support stand depends upon how closely the target pointer and the base phantom pointer can be aligned. The hardware provided with the system is difficult to use and easily leads to damage of the pointer tips.

RESULTS

In this work, we provide the manufacturer's specifications for a popular stereotactic system, describe a device that can be used to check quickly and easily the accuracy of the base phantom, and describe a modification to the transfer pointer system that allows the pointer tips to be more easily aligned with reduced possibility of damage to the pointer tips.

CONCLUSION

The methods and apparatus described in this paper should be useful to anyone using a base phantom for testing radiosurgery accuracy.

Adaptation and verification of the relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame in stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) combines techniques of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with radiation therapy fractionation schemes. Fractionation in SRT necessitates a relocatable immobilization system to precisely reproduce the patient's position at each treatment. The Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) head frame is such an immobilization device compatible with the Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) stereotactic system. We describe this device, our modifications to the original design, the repeat position accuracy, and the daily verification procedure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The original GTC frame was tested on volunteers. This testing led to an improved strapping system, the decision to construct the oral fixation appliance at our dental clinic, and the construction of a depth confirmation helmet to rapidly confirm the position of the frame on a daily basis. The GTC frame, at our institution, is not acceptable for children requiring anesthesia, and a new frame, the "Boston Childrens' Hospital" frame, was designed. This device uses the base ring of the GTC frame. Airway access is maintained through fixation on the nasal-glabellar region and the ear canal rather than the hard palate and upper gingiva.

RESULTS

The modifications of the GTC frame and the verification protocol result in repeat positioning of the frame with respect to the patient anatomy, with a standard deviation of 0.4 mm for both the modified GTC frame and the Boston Childrens' Hospital frame. The relocatibility of the frames has been established in over 2,000 patient setups in over 60 patients to date.

DISCUSSION

The GTC frame is a noninvasive and versatile fixation system that provides patient comfort, as well as accurate relocatibility for SRT. The frame is not appropriate for single fraction radiosurgery, as a large setup error (> 2 mm) for a single treatment cannot be excluded. The GTC frame is compatible with the BRW system, and treatment planning for SRT and SRS patients is identical. We currently treat 10-13 SRT patients per day with intracranial neoplasms on a dedicated stereotactic therapy unit. In addition, the Boston Childrens' Hospital frame allows the use of stereotactic therapy in the treatment of children under 6 years of age. This population will benefit especially from precise and highly focal cranial irradiation.

Assurance of high quality linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery is generally a single, high-dose radiation treatment for the brain requiring targeting accuracy on the order of a millimeter. From the initial implementation of radiosurgery, therefore, quality assurance is an ongoing process of paramount importance. In this paper, we outline the basic elements of a quality assurance program for our linear accelerator that has been in use at Washington University Medical Center over the past 2 years.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Various devices and procedures have been developed to verify the accuracy and safety of the stereotactic radiosurgery regimen. Specifically, we present methods for assessing the attainment of spatially correct patient images, the reliability of the computerized treatment planning system, achieving physical safety for the patient, as well as the proper operation of the radiation treatment device.

RESULTS

Our procedures have allowed us to assure quality patient treatments and, additionally, has permitted monitoring our performance for continual improvement. For example, a plot of targeting accuracy with the number of patients shows an asymptotic approach to a value within 0.6 mm of that ideally expected.

CONCLUSION

To maintain high-quality patient care, one must review critical aspects of the treatment regimen on a periodic basis. Providing for the appropriate level of staff training, periodic reviews of procedures and maintenance of forms are also very important.

Precise positioning of intracranial small tumors to the linear accelerator's isocenter, using a stereotactic radiotherapy computed tomography system (SRT-CT)

RT-CT was developed as a simulator using CT scan for radiotherapy. Following three-dimensional treatment planning using CT images, the treatment center and treatment fields are projected to the patients' surface by laser beam on the C arm. The prototype had an accuracy of 3 mm which was equivalent to conventional X-ray simulators but was not adequate for use in stereotactic radiotherapy. A new RT-CT system was developed to have a precise localization capability for stereotactic radiotherapy. Using this stereotactic RT-CT (SRT-CT) after three-dimensional planning, the treatment center is projected to the stereotactic frame automatically. In this study, the values of the x, y and z coordinates of the target center determined by SRT-CT are compared with those determined by the traditional method using CT localizing plates. The discrepancies were within 1.0 mm in 90% and 1.5 mm in 100% of 30 measurements in 16 patients. The disadvantages of SRT-CT may be that the accuracy of localization depends on the quality of calibration of laser beams. The traditional CT localizing method has superiority over SRT-CT because of its solid coordinates but its accuracy is vulnerable to alignment of CT fiducial marker plates. Therefore, the SRT-CT and traditional CT localizing methods would be complementary to each other for precise localization.

Halo ring supporting the Brown-Roberts-Wells stereotactic frame for fractionated radiotherapy

The authors describe a new instrumentation for repositioning of the Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) stereotaxic system, useful for precise fractionated radiotherapy. A lucite ring is fixed to the patient's skull with four screws. Another ring, partially open, is then firmly connected co-axially to the lower part of the first one with four spacer-bars. The fixture permits an exact repositioning of the B.R.W. stereotaxic system, placing the target point in the linear accelerator isocenter. The preliminary technical results obtained in five children are reported and the fixture performance, advantages, and perspectives are discussed.

Quality assurance in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

The recent development of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), which utilises the relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame (GTC 'repeat localiser'), requires comprehensive quality assurance (QA). This paper focuses on those QA procedures particularly relevant to fractionated SRT treatments, and which have been derived from the technique used at the Royal Marsden Hospital. They primarily relate to the following: (i) GTC frame fitting, initially in the mould room, and then at each imaging session and treatment fraction; (ii) checking of the linear accelerator beam geometry and alignment lasers; and (iii) setting up of the patient for each fraction of treatment. The precision of the fractionated technique therefore depends on monitoring the GTC frame relocation at each fitting, checking the accuracy of the radiation isocentre of the treatment unit, its coincidence with the patient alignment lasers and the adjustments required to set the patient up accurately. The results of our quality control checks show that setting up to a mean radiation isocentre using precisely set-up alignment lasers can be achievable to within 1 mm accuracy. When this is combined with a mean GTC frame relocatability of 1 mm on the patient, a 2-mm allowance between the prescribed isodose surface and the defined target volume is a realistic safety margin for this technique.

Fine tuning of linear accelerator accessories for stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Experience with the University of Wisconsin's stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) accessory system was applied to build a new system, facilitate alignment of linac photon beams with a Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) stereotaxy, and increase the versatility and stability of the stereotaxy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

High tensile strength stainless steel was used in the floor stand to increase the range of gantry rotation relative to ranges allowed by truss-mounted stands. The collimator assembly and floor stand were each fitted with two-axis gimbal and translation adjustments in addition to the floor stand's three-axis adjustments. The head ring positioning assembly was fitted with two braces to prevent the head ring from deforming with patient motion. Six MV linac photon beam characteristics were measured with a computer-controlled scanning system and a diode in water, at source to surface distances (SSD) of 80 and 100 cm, and for 13 divergent collimators ranging in diameter from 1-4 cm at 100 cm SSD. Quality assurance software was applied to screen data for questionable consistency or symmetry. Integrity of the stereotaxy was evaluated with target simulation films and repeated measurements which were part of the quality assurance of clinical treatments. A method was developed using a glass etched contact reticle to obtain average simulated target to beam center distances (delta av) from target simulation films.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

New aspects of the current system have improved the ability to fine tune and analyze stereotactic alignment. Beam characteristics met stringent output criteria and penumbral widths were the same or narrower than penumbral widths reported elsewhere. The precision of measuring delta av was 0.1 mm, and delta av averaged over 50 target simulation films was 0.7 +/- 0.1 mm. Results suggest that it may be useful to determine delta av from target simulation films with the method described here.

Precision and accuracy of stereotactic convergent beam irradiations from a linear accelerator

PURPOSE

The accuracy and the precision for radiosurgery procedures at linear accelerator facilities were investigated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The technique of convergent beam irradiation, that is a series of successive isocentric arc irradiations, is specifically considered in this paper. Accuracy and precision depend on a sequence of methods and equipment among which localization of the target, patient alignment, and the dose delivery are the most critical steps. The purpose of the investigation was to quantitatively assess their contribution to the overall accuracy. The definitions and methods used to quantify and control accuracy are described. Measurements were carried out at a phantom to analyze the localization and positioning errors. Errors which may occur with the dose delivery technique were studied by a computer simulation.

RESULTS

The calculations showed that these errors are not the main contributors to the overall accuracy as long as the linac inaccuracies are in the order or less than 1 mm. The accuracy found in the localization and positioning methods was less than 1 mm.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that an overall accuracy in the order of 1 mm can be obtained also under routine conditions. The great importance of adequate quality control is emphasized.

Quality assurance programme on stereotactic radiosurgery

In order to achieve a high level of quality in radiosurgical procedures, a quality assurance programme (QAP) has to be worked out. An informal "Quality Assurance Task Group" is currently preparing a QAP for that purpose. The concepts that have been worked out and critically discussed by the members of the task group are presented. The final version of the QAP is expected to be completed at the end of 1993.