Predictive role of TDF values in late rectal recto-sigmoid complications in irradiation treatment of cervix cancer

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) as treatment of pancreatic cancer at HIT: initial radiation plan analysis of the prospective phase II PACK-study

PURPOSE

To analyze the dose objectives and constraints applied at the prospective phase II PACK-study at Heidelberg ion therapy center (HIT) for different radiobiological models.

METHODS

Treatment plans of 14 patients from the PACK-study were analyzed and recomputed in terms of physical, biological dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd). Both LEM-I (local effect model 1) and the adapted NIRS-MKM (microdosimetric kinetic model), were used for relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose calculations (DBio|HIT and DBio|NIRS). A new constraint to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract was derived from the National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS) clinical experience and considered for plan reoptimization (DBio|NIRS-const_48Gy and DBio|NIRS-const_50.4Gy). The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for GI toxicity endpoints was computed. Furthermore, the computed LETd distribution was evaluated and correlated with Local Control (LC).

RESULTS

Only two patients showed a LETd98% in the GTV greater than 44 keV/μm. A HIT-dose constraint to the GI of [Formula: see text] was derived from the NIRS experience, in alternative to the standard at HIT Dmax = 45.6 GyRBEHIT. In comparison with the original DBio|HIT,DBio|NIRS-const_48GyandDBio|NIRS-const_50.4Gy resulted in an increase in the ITV's D98% of 8.7% and 11.3%. The NTCP calculation resulted in a probability for gastrointestinal bleeding of 4.5%, 12.3% and 13.0%, for DBio|NIRS, DBio|NIRS-const_48Gy and DBio|NIRS-const_50.4Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the current standards applied at HIT for CIRT closely align with the Japanese experience. However, to enhance tumor coverage, a more relaxed constraint on the GI tract may be considered. As the PACK-trial progresses, further analyses of various clinical endpoints are anticipated.

Variable impact of intracavitary brachytherapy fractionation schedule on biologically effective dose to organs at risk in patients with cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) fractionation schedule on biologically effective dose to organs at risk.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed records from 26 patients who had CT imaging during ICBT for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer. Using α/β=10, we calculated hypothetical nominal doses to achieve a biologically effective dose at 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2α/β=10) of 40 Gy to Point A for high-dose-rate ICBT with 1-15 fractions. Corresponding minimum EQD2α/β=3s to the maximally irradiated 2 cc of rectum, bladder, and sigmoid were calculated for each fractionation scheme and added to EQD2α/β=3 from external beam radiotherapy. Total EQD2α/β=3s were compared with American Brachytherapy Society suggested dose constraints (rectum/sigmoid, ≤75 Gy; bladder, ≤90 Gy).

RESULTS

Except for rectal EQD2α/β=3 in three patients, the rectal, bladder, and sigmoid EQD2α/β=3s decreased with increasing fractionation in all patients. Although the total rectal EQD2α/β=3s were less than the American Brachytherapy Society rectal dose constraint in all patients at all fractionation schedules, the total bladder EQD2α/β=3s routinely exceeded the bladder dose constraint, even at maximum fractionation. By contrast, increasing fractionation decreased the number of patients with doses exceeding the sigmoid dose constraint by 48%.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between ICBT fractionation schedule and relative EQD2α/β=3s to rectum, bladder, and sigmoid depends on individual anatomy. Fractionation optimization can improve therapeutic ratios by minimizing the risk or severity of toxic effects. For patients in whom many fractions optimize the therapeutic ratio, low-dose-rate or pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy may be preferred.

Comparative assessment of doses to tumor, rectum, and bladder as evaluated by orthogonal radiographs vs. computer enhanced computed tomography-based intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To carry out a comparative assessment of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) doses to tumor, bladder, and rectum based on orthogonal films and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-five ICBT procedures with CT/MRI compatible applicator and CECT scans were evaluated. Doses to Point A, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) reference points for maximum bladder (B max(ICRU)) and rectum (R max(ICRU)) localized from orthogonal films were compared with CECT delineated tumor, bladder (B max(CECT)), and rectum (R max(CECT)) doses, respectively. The 95th and 90th percentile bladder (B 95(CECT) and B 90(CECT)) and rectal (R 95(CECT) and R 90(CECT)) doses based on CECT were also estimated.

RESULTS

Mean percentage tumor volume encompassed within the prescribed dose of 600 cGy to Point A was 88.8%. Mean B max(ICRU), B max(CECT), R max(ICRU), and R max(CECT) were 631.3 cGy, 1221.4 cGy, 454.8 cGy, and 526.9 cGy, respectively. Paired mean differences were significant between B max(ICRU) and B max(CECT) or B 95(CECT) (both p < 0.001); R max(ICRU) and R max(CECT) (p = 0.005) or R 90(CECT) (p < 0.001), whereas insignificant for B max(ICRU) and B 90(CECT) (p = 0.281), and R max(ICRU) and R 95(CECT) (p = 0.372).

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription based on Point A ICBT doses could lead to uncertainty and underdosage in tumor. ICRU 38 maximum bladder and rectal doses significantly underestimate the maximum doses to these organs and represent the 90th and 95th percentile of the maximum doses to these organs, respectively.

Quantification of intracavitary brachytherapy parameters and correlation with outcome in patients with carcinoma of the cervix

PURPOSE

To quantify the M. D. Anderson criteria for acceptable implant geometry; to relate our system of intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) prescription to Manchester and ICRU reference doses; and to correlate these parameters with outcome measures.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The relationships between intracavitary applicators and normal structures were measured directly from localization films of 808 applications performed in 396 patients who completed definitive treatment for cervical cancer between 1990 and 1994. The distances between applicators and tissue landmarks and the doses to Manchester and normal tissue reference points were correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

The median distance from the tandem to the sacrum was 4.0 cm, or one-third the distance from the pubis to the sacrum. The mean distance between the vaginal ovoids and cervical marker seeds was 7 mm, and the median distance between the tandem and the posterior edge of the ovoids was 50% of the ovoid length. In 92% of insertions, vaginal packing was posterior to or within 5 mm of a line that passed through the posterior edge of the ovoids, parallel to the tandem. The median doses to Point A and rectal, bladder, and vaginal surface reference points were 87 Gy, 68 Gy, 70 Gy, and 125 Gy, respectively. Although these reference doses were not routinely used to prescribe treatment, consistent applicator geometry and source selection resulted in a relatively narrow range of delivered doses. The average ratios between the doses at bladder or rectal reference points and Point A were somewhat greater when smaller vaginal applicators were used. Patients received a median of 5600 mgRaEq-h from ICRT. The total mgRaEq-h were correlated with but were not proportional to the dose at Point A. There were no significant correlations between the doses to standard reference points and the rates of central recurrence or major complications.

CONCLUSION

When ICRT implants are carefully placed, relatively high paracentral doses can be delivered that yield a high rate of central disease control with an acceptable rate of complications. The narrow range of doses delivered to standard reference points and their inconsistent correlation with the maximum doses delivered to normal tissues probably contributed to a lack of correlation between reference doses and outcome.

Pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy in a rat model: dependence of late rectal injury on radiation pulse size

PURPOSE

Clinical protocols utilizing pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy (PDR) to replace traditional continuous low dose rate brachytherapy (CLDR) employ irradiation in individual pulses given at intervals of a few hours. A critical factor in determining whether PDR will produce equivalent or greater late-occurring normal tissue toxicity is the dose per pulse. A rat rectal model was used to determine the role of pulse size in modifying dose effectiveness in producing late-occurring toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A rat model in which the rectum is irradiated with 192Ir sources was used in conjunction with an intracavitary applicator. A section of rectum 1.3 cm in length was irradiated with either 0.75 Gy/h CLDR or one of five schemes of PDR. The schemes applied 0.375, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 Gy pulses at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, or 8.0 h intervals, respectively. Rats were observed for up to 300 days after completion of irradiation for rectal obstruction. Rectal specimens were taken at the time of sacrifice for obstruction or at the end of follow-up and analyzed histologically for injury.

RESULTS

Effectiveness of irradiation was analyzed by calculating the ED50 for incidence of obstruction and severe histological injury. The ED50 for obstruction after treatment with CLDR and pulse sizes of 0.375, 0.75, and 1.5 Gy were 70.5, 68.0, 68.6, and 68.8 Gy, respectively. These values were not significantly different. Compared to CLDR, the ED50 for obstruction after pulse sizes of 3.0 and 6.0 Gy were significantly different at 60.9 and 46.3 Gy, respectively. The relative changes in ED50 for the different radiation schemes in producing ulceration, fibrosis, and vascular sclerosis injury were similar to that observed for obstruction. The endpoints of colitis cystica profunda and atypical epithelial regeneration varied less with increasing pulse size.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that for late rat rectal injury, dose responses to PDR pulse sizes up to 1.5 Gy at 2-h intervals are not distinguishable from that seen with CLDR at a dose rate of 0.75 Gy/h.

Carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of complications after primary external beam radiation and Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is still a concern that the use of HDR brachytherapy might result in an increase of late tissue damage. This restrospective study evaluates the incidence and severity of late complications in patients with carcinoma of the cervix who underwent combined external beam radiation (EBR) and Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy and attempts to identify pretreatment and treatment parameters correlating with late complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1985 and 1992, 161 patients with carcinoma of the cervix (FIGO stages IB-IVB) received EBR to the pelvis (ave, max. dose 48.8 Gy) followed by 1-6 Ir-192 HDR placements (median 2). Doses to point A ranged from 8.5 to 38.7 Gy (median 17 Gy). Parameters examined included age, diabetes, obesity, history of inflammatory bowel disease or diverticulitis, prior surgery, hemoglobin level, FIGO stage, EBR dose, technique and daily dose fraction, number of HDR treatments and total dose to point A, maximum doses to bladder and rectum delivered by brachytherapy and cumulative dose to point A. Median follow-up for all patients was 37 months. Complications were rated using an in-house scoring system and according to the French-Italian Glossary (FIG).

RESULTS

Actuarial 5-year survival was 93%, 57%, 46%, and 0% for stages IB, II, IIIB, and IV, respectively. Of 161 patients, 11% developed moderate and 3.7% severe sequelae (FIG: 2.5%, 3.7%). Since some patients experienced more than one complication, the overall incidence was 13.6% and 4.9% (FIG: 3.1%, 4.9%) with respective 5-year actuarial rates of 14% and 5% for moderate, and 2% and 8% for severe bowel and genitourinary tract complications (FIG: 3.5%, 0, and 2%, 8%). All severe bowel complications occurred within 1.5 years whereas urinary tract sequelae continued to develop throughout the follow-up period. FIGO stage was associated with a significant increase in late sequelae (P = 0.015). Analysis of the remaining pretreatment and treatment parameters failed to reveal any statistically significant correlation with moderate or severe sequelae.

CONCLUSION

In our series using HDR brachytherapy, complication and survival rates were comparable with other series employing either LDR or HDR procedures. Of all parameters analysed, stage of disease was the only parameter significantly correlated with complications in univariate and multivariate analysis.

Radiation injuries of the gastrointestinal tract

Although radiation has proven itself valuable in the treatment of a variety of pelvic malignancies, it is not without serious morbidity. This article has outlined the incidence of acute and chronic injury, ways to prevent the occurrence of complications, and the use of new medical and surgical treatments.

Rectal complications in patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with concomitant cisplatin and external beam irradiation with high dose rate brachytherapy: a dosimetric analysis

PURPOSE

This paper reports a dosimetric study of 43 patients treated with a combination of concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (cisplatin) for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix with the aim of investigating the correlation between the radiation dose to the rectum and the incidence of late rectal complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiotherapy consisted of 46 Gy external beam irradiation plus three high dose rate intracavitary treatments given weekly, concurrent with the last 3 weeks of external beam therapy, to a total dose of 30 Gy to point A. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 was given weekly throughout the duration of the external beam irradiation. The brachytherapy irradiated volume was reconstructed from the orthogonal treatment radiographs to accurately locate the reference points defined by the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), report 38. The doses calculated at these points were compared to in vivo dose measurements performed immediately prior to treatment.

RESULTS

The group of patients who were calculated to have received a dose to the rectal reference point greater than the prescribed point A dose (9/13) had a significantly greater probability of development of late rectal complications compared to the group of patients who were calculated to have received less than the prescribed point A dose at this rectal point (7/30), p = 0.003. There was no correlation of rate of complication with the in vivo measured dose in the rectum, stage of disease, or age. At 40 months post treatment, the group of patients receiving the higher dose to the rectal reference point had an actuarial rate of serious (Grade 3 and 4) rectal complications of 46% compared to a rate of 14% in the remainder. In terms of survival, the group of patients receiving the higher dose to the rectal reference point have all survived, whereas the group of patients receiving the lower dose to the rectal reference point have a significantly different rate of survival of 72%, p = 0.046.

CONCLUSION

This investigation has revealed a significant correlation between the dose calculated at the rectal point defined by the ICRU and the incidence of late rectal complications in patients with carcinoma of the cervix undergoing concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Thus, this rectal reference point appears to be a useful prognostic indicator of late rectal complications in these patients and we recommend that the brachytherapy dose delivered to this rectal point be limited to the dose prescribed to point A for treatment regimens using three fractions of 8-10 Gy each, limiting the total dose to this point, including the external beam component, to 76 Gy. Further study will be required to determine whether this rule should be applied to patients receiving irradiation alone.

Influence of dose-rate and dose per fraction on clinical outcome of breast cancer treated by external beam irradiation plus iridium-192 implants: analysis of 289 cases

PURPOSE

To study the influence of Iridium 192 implant dose-rate and dose per fraction of external irradiation on clinical outcome, the results in 289 patients with early breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1980 to 1990, 118 T1 and 171 T2 lesions of breast were treated definitively by radiotherapy, following conservative surgery. External irradiation dose of 45 Gy was delivered either with 2.5 Gy or 1.8 Gy per fraction to the entire target volume, plus boost to the primary tumor. Boost dose of 15 to 30 Gy was given to the primary tumor either with iridium-192 implants or electrons. The implant dose-rate varied between 20 cGy/hr to 160 cGy/hr.

RESULTS

The minimum follow-up was of 12 months and maximum of 11 years (median: 56 months). Out of 273 tumors boosted with implants, the 270 patients were divided into five groups according to dose-rate as, groups 1 (20-29 cGy/hr, n = 17), group 2 (30-49 cGy/hr, n = 144), group 3 (50-69 cGy/hr, n = 69), group 4 (70-99 cGy/hr, n = 27) and group 5 (100-160 cGy/hr, n = 13). The local failure rate was significantly increased in the group of patients treated with implant dose-rate < 30 cGy/hr (p < 0.05). While the incidence of late normal tissue complications and poor cosmetic outcome was significantly higher in the group of patients treated with implant dose-rate > 100 cGy/hr (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present analysis indicate that the implant dose-rate should be maintained between 30-70 cGy/hr to maximize local control and reduce the late normal tissue injury. Also the increase in dose per fraction of external irradiation while not influencing local control rate was crucial for incidence of late complications and cosmetic outcome.