1
|
Vinh-Hung V, Leduc N, Verellen D, Verschraegen C, Dipasquale G, Nguyen NP. The mean absolute dose deviation-A common metric for the evaluation of dose-volume histograms in radiation therapy. Med Dosim 2019; 45:186-189. [PMID: 31757715 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy needs to balance between delivering a high dose to targets and the lowest possible dose to the organs at risk. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) summarize the distribution of radiation doses in the irradiated structures. The interpretation can however be a challenge when the number of structures is high. We propose the use of a simple summary metric. We define the mean absolute dose deviation (MADD) as the average of absolute differences between a DVH and a reference dose. The properties are evaluated through numerical analysis. Calculus trivially shows the identity of the MADD and the area between curves, between DVH and reference dose. Computation of the MADD is the same regardless of structures' designation, whether organ at risk or target, on the same dose scale. Basic calculus properties open the perspective of applying the MADD to the evaluation of treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France 97200 Martinique, France.
| | - Nicolas Leduc
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France 97200 Martinique, France
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Medical Physics, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk 2610, Belgium
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao B, Joiner MC, Orton CG, Burmeister J. “SABER”: A new software tool for radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation. Med Phys 2010; 37:5586-92. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3497152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
3
|
Carlier SG, Marijnissen JP, Coen VL, Sabate M, van der Giessen WJ, Ligthart J, den Boer A, Levendag PC, Serruys PW. Comparison of brachytherapy strategies based on dose-volume histograms derived from quantitative intravascular ultrasound. CARDIOVASCULAR RADIATION MEDICINE 1999; 1:115-24. [PMID: 11229543 DOI: 10.1016/s1522-1865(99)00003-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We present in this paper the comparison, by simulation, of different treatment strategies based either on beta- or gamma-sources, both with and without a centering device. Ionizing radiation to prevent restenosis is an emerging modality in interventional cardiology. Numerous clinical studies are presently being performed or planned, but there is variability in dose prescription, and both gamma- and beta-emitters are used, leading to a wide range of possible dose distributions over the arterial vessel wall. This paper discusses the potential merits of dose-volume histograms (DVH) based on three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to compare brachytherapy treatment strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS DVH describe the cumulative distribution of dose over three specific volumes: (1) at the level of the luminal surface, a volume was defined with a thickness of 0.1 mm from the automatically detected contour of the highly echogenic blood-vessel interface; (2) at the level of the IVUS echogenic media-adventitia interface (external elastic lamina [EEL]), an adventitial volume was computed considering a 0.5-mm thickness from EEL; and (3) the volume encompassed between the luminal surface and the EEL (plaque + media). The IVUS data used were recorded in 23 of 31 patients during the Beta Energy Restenosis Trial (BERT) conducted in our institution. RESULTS On average, the minimal dose in 90% of the adventitial volume was 37 +/- 16% of the prescribed dose; the minimal dose in 90% of the plaque + media volume was 58 +/- 24% and of the luminal surface volume was 67 +/- 31%. The minimal dose in the 10% most exposed luminal surface volume was 296 +/- 42%. Simulations of the use of a gamma-emitter and/or a radioactive source train centered in the lumen are reported, with a comparison of the homogeneity of the dose distribution. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to derive DVH from IVUS, to evaluate the dose delivered to different parts of the coronary wall. This process should improve our understanding of the mechanisms of action of brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Carlier
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ginestet C, Malet C, Lafay F, Dupin G, Chavand B, Carrie C. [Conformational radiotherapy with multi-leaf collimators: one year experience at the Leon-Berard Centre]. Cancer Radiother 1998; 1:328-40. [PMID: 9435824 DOI: 10.1016/s1278-3218(97)81501-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Taking advantage of the renewal of a linear accelerator, the Radiation Therapy Department of the Centre Léon Bérard implemented, in collaboration with Philips Systèmes Médicaux, a conformal therapy set-up procedure using CT-scan for 3D treatment planning and a multileaf collimator that allows achievement of numerous irregular-shaped beams via the multileaf preparation system. The various elements of this equipment make possible well defined and structured procedures for treatment planning with different steps and essential tools used by this technique. We describe the means used and indicate future improvements that will lead to automation in order to provide good quality assurance, better security and substantial time saving. During the first year, 115 patients were treated with this new technique. They presented with central nervous system tumors (32 patients), lung cancer (29 patients), prostate cancer (20 patients), paranasal sinus tumors (14 patients) and tumors located in other sites (13 patients with soft sarcoma, hepato-bilary tumor, etc).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ginestet
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dykstra C, Bortfeld T, Debus J, Lomax A, Harrop R, Schlegel W, Munkel G. Characterization of dose distribution in radiation therapy plans. Radiother Oncol 1996; 41:281-4. [PMID: 9027946 DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)01847-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
As a method of considering only significant radiation doses to different tissues, the ICRU Report 50 recommends taking the dose given to a significant tissue volume (minimum diameter greater then 15 mm) instead of choosing a single, potentially insignificant, voxel value. In order to find this significant volume, we have adapted an emission imaging analysis method to radiation therapy planning. The resulting method finds and characterizes the dose distribution in the volumes of interest in a way that includes spatial arrangement. The data can be used to signal significant hot or cold volumes in the dose plan and to score the plans based on significant dose to the tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dykstra
- Forschungsschwerpunktd Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrunt, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Balter JM, Ten Haken RK, Lawrence TS, Lam KL, Robertson JM. Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 36:167-74. [PMID: 8823272 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00275-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 264] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate uncertainties associated with treatment-planning computed tomography (CT) data obtained with the patient breathing freely. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with thoracic or abdominal tumors underwent a standard treatment-planning CT study while breathing quietly and freely, followed by CT scans while holding their breath at normal inhalation and normal exhalation. Identical treatment plans on all three CT data sets for each patient pointed out differences in: (a) radiation path lengths; (b) positions of the organs; (c) physical volumes of the lung, liver, and kidneys; (d) the interpretation of plan evaluation tools such as dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models; and (e) how well the planning CT data set represented the average of the inhalation and exhalation studies. RESULTS Inhalation and exhalation data differ in terms of radiation path length (nearly one quarter of the cases had path-length differences > 1 cm), although the free breathing and average path lengths do not exhibit large differences (0-9 mm). Liver and kidney movements averaged 2 cm, whereas differences between the free breathing and average positions averaged 0.6 cm. The physical volume of the liver between the free breathing and static studies varied by as much as 12%. The NTCP calculations on exhale and inhale studies varied from 3 to 43% for doses that resulted in a 15% NTCP on the free-breathing studies. CONCLUSION Free-breathing CT studies may improperly estimate the position and volume of critical structures, and thus may mislead evaluation of plans based on such volume dependent criteria such as dose-volume histograms and NTCP calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Balter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Datta NR, Das KJ, Balasubramanium R, Ayyagari S. Spatial information on dose distribution using multisectional dose-volume histograms. Med Dosim 1996; 21:19-22. [PMID: 8679066 DOI: 10.1016/0958-3947(95)02057-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Dose-volume histograms are useful tools to summarize the information on the dose profiles resulting within a target volume. However, the spatial relationships of the hot and the cold spots are blunted in the dose-volume histograms. This study tries to circumvent this problem using multisectional dose-volume histograms and highlight the utility of these in the optimization of a radiation therapy plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Datta
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Graham MV, Jain NL, Kahn MG, Drzymala RE, Purdy JA. Evaluation of an objective plan-evaluation model in the three dimensional treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 34:469-74. [PMID: 8567350 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02115-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluation of three dimensional (3D) radiotherapy plans is difficult because it requires the review of vast amounts of data. Selecting the optimal plan from a set of competing plans involves making trade-offs among the doses delivered to the target volumes and normal tissues. The purpose of this study was to test an objective plan-evaluation model and evaluate its clinical usefulness in 3D treatment planning for nonsmall cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy were studied using full 3D techniques for treatment design and implementation. For each patient, the evaluator (the treating radiation oncologist) initially ranked three plans using room-view dose-surface displays and dose-volume histograms, and identified the issues that needed to be improved. The three plans were then ranked by the objective plan-evaluation model. A figure of merit (FOM) was computed for each plan by combining the numerical score (utility in decision-theoretic terms) for each clinical issue. The utility was computed from a probability of occurrence of the issue and a physician-specific weight indicating its clinical relevance. The FOM was used to rank the competing plans for a patient, and the utility was used to identify issues that needed to be improved. These were compared with the initial evaluations of the physician and discrepancies were analyzed. The issues identified in the best treatment plan were then used to attempt further manual optimization of this plan. RESULTS For the 20 patients (60 plans) in the study, the final plan ranking produced by the plan-evaluation model had an initial 73% agreement with the ranking provided by the evaluator. After discrepant cases were reviewed by the physician, the model was usually judged more objective or "correct." In most cases the model was also able to correctly identify the issues that needed improvement in each plan. Subsequent replanning confirmed that further manual plan optimization could be achieved in 17 patients. CONCLUSION The objective plan-evaluation model was able to rank lung cancer radiotherapy plans from best to worst. It was useful in improving plans and may be useful to physicians in defining goals for patients based on the ability to effectively and safely treat their tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M V Graham
- Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Austin-Seymour M, Chen GT, Rosenman J, Michalski J, Lindsley K, Goitein M. Tumor and target delineation: current research and future challenges. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 33:1041-52. [PMID: 7493830 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00215-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In the past decade, significant progress has been made in the imaging of tumors, three dimensional (3D) treatment planning, and radiation treatment delivery. At this time one of the greatest challenges for conformal radiation therapy is the accurate delineation of tumor and target volumes. The physician encounters many uncertainties in the process of defining both tumor and target. The sources of these uncertainties are discussed, as well as the issues requiring study to reduce these uncertainties.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kessler ML, Ten Haken RK, Fraass BA, McShan DL. Expanding the use and effectiveness of dose-volume histograms for 3-D treatment planning. I: Integration of 3-D dose-display. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994; 29:1125-31. [PMID: 8083082 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90409-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A technique is presented for overcoming a major deficiency of histogram analysis in three-dimensional (3-D) radiotherapy treatment planning; the lack of spatial information. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this technique, histogram data and anatomic images are displayed in a side-by-side fashion. The histogram curve is used as a guide to interactively probe the nature of the corresponding 3-D dose distribution. Regions of dose that contribute to a specific dose bin or range of bins are interactively highlighted on the anatomic display as a window-style cursor is positioned along the dose-axis of the histogram display. This dose range highlighting can be applied to two-dimensional (2-D) images and to 3-D views which contain anatomic surfaces, multimodality image data, and representations of radiation beams and beam modifiers. Additionally, as a range of histogram bins is specified, dose and volume statistics for the range are continually updated and displayed. RESULTS The implementation of these techniques is presented and their use illustrated for a nonaxial three field treatment of a hepatic tumor. CONCLUSION By integrating displays of 3-D doses and the corresponding histogram data, it is possible to recover the positional information inherently lost in the calculation of a histogram. Important questions such as the size and location of hot spots in normal tissues and cold spots within target volumes can be more easily uncovered, making the iterative improvement of treatment plans more efficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Kessler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0010
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Purdy JA, Harms WB, Matthews JW, Drzymala R, Emami B, Simpson JR, Manolis J, Rosenberger FU. Advances in 3-dimensional radiation treatment planning systems: room-view display with real time interactivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 27:933-44. [PMID: 8244826 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90471-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe our 3-dimensional (3-D) radiation treatment planning system for external photon and electron beam 3-D treatment planning which provides high performance computational speed and a real-time display which we have named "room-view" in which the simulated target volumes, critical structures, skin surfaces, radiation beams and/or dose surfaces can be viewed on the display monitor from any arbitrary viewing position. METHODS AND MATERIALS We have implemented the 3-D planning system on a graphics superworkstation with parallel processing. Patient's anatomical features are extracted from contiguous computed tomography scan images and are displayed as wireloops or solid surfaces. Radiation beams are displayed as a set of diverging rays plus the polygons formed by the intersection of these rays with planes perpendicular to the beam axis. Controls are provided for each treatment machine motion function. Photon dose calculations are performed using an effective pathlength algorithm modified to accommodate 3-D off-center ratios. Electron dose calculations are performed using a 3-D pencil beam model. RESULTS Dose distribution information can be displayed as 3-D dose surfaces, dose-volume histograms, or as isodoses superimposed on 2-D gray scale images of the patient's anatomy. Tumor-control-probabilities, normal-tissue-complication probabilities and a figure-of-merit score function are generated to aid in plan evaluation. A split-screen display provides a beam's-eye-view for beam positioning and design of patient shielding block apertures and a concurrent "room-view" display of the patient and beam icon for viewing multiple beam set-ups, beam positioning, and plan evaluation. Both views are simultaneously interactive. CONCLUSION The development of an interactive 3-D radiation treatment planning system with a real-time room-view display has been accomplished. The concurrent real-time beam's-eye-view and room-view display significantly improves the efficacy of the 3-D planning process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Purdy
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ten Haken RK, Martel MK, Kessler ML, Hazuka MB, Lawrence TS, Robertson JM, Turrisi AT, Lichter AS. Use of Veff and iso-NTCP in the implementation of dose escalation protocols. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 27:689-95. [PMID: 8226166 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90398-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This report investigates the use of a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, 3-D dose distributions, and a dose volume histogram reduction scheme in the design and implementation of dose escalation protocols for irradiation of sites that are primarily limited by the dose to a normal tissue which exhibits a strong volume effect (e.g., lung, liver). METHODS AND MATERIALS Plots containing iso-NTCP contours are generated as a function of dose and partial volume using a parameterization of a NTCP description. Single step dose volume histograms are generated from 3-D dose distributions using the effective-volume (Veff) reduction scheme. In this scheme, the value of Veff for each dose volume histogram is independent of dose units (Gy, %). Thus, relative dose distributions (%) may be used to segregate patients by Veff into bins containing different ranges of Veff values before the assignment of prescription doses (Gy). The doses for each bin of Veff values can then be independently escalated between estimated complication levels (iso-NTCP contours). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Given that for the site under study, an investigator believes that the NTCP parameterization and the Veff methodology at least describe the general trend of clinical expectations, the concepts discussed allow the use of patient specific 3-D dose/volume information in the design and implementation of dose escalation studies. The result is a scheme with which useful prospective tolerance data may be systematically obtained for testing the different NTCP parameterizations and models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R K Ten Haken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
|