Iridium-192 interstitial therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis

Implementation of 3D image-guided brachytherapy for penile cancer: Impact of urethral dose on long-term morbidity

PURPOSE

Interstitial brachytherapy is a conservative treatment approach for localized penile glans cancer. We report our experience with pulse dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (PDR-BT) in the treatment of penile cancer and evaluated urethral dose-volume constraints for clinical practice.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Medical records of patients treated with PDR-BT for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the glans penis in our institution between July 2008 and February 2019 were reviewed. All patients underwent posthectomy followed by CT-guided PDR-BT. Urethral doses were calculated and predictors of urethral stenosis among various clinical and dosimetric characteristics were examined.

RESULTS

65 patients were identified. Eight patients (12%) presented initially with inguinal lymph node metastasis. The median brachytherapy dose was 60 Gy (37-65 Gy). The median number of pulses was 150 pulses (87-175 pulses). With a median follow-up of 37 months (3-120 months), 12 patients (18.4%) had tumor local relapse. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 88.2% (95%CI: 79.7-97.7%) and 74.4% (95%CI: 63.9-86.6%) respectively. Twelve patients (20%) presented grade 2 painful ulceration resolving spontaneously and 13 patients (21.5%) experienced grade 2 meatal stenosis. No clinical or dosimetric factors correlated with painful ulceration were identified. The risk of meatal stenosis correlated with distal urethra D0.1cc (p = 0.0016) and D0.2cc (p = 0.0019) in multivariate analysis. The optimal cutoff for these constraints were 82 Gy (HR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.04-0.38) and 79 Gy (HR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.06-0.56) for D0.1 cc and D0.2 cc respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This institutional experience shows that 3D PDR-BT could be a valid option for penile preservation. Dosimetric constraints for late distal urethral toxicity were identified.

Management of Lymph Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2-3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2-3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2-3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.

The role of radiotherapy in the management of squamous cell cancer of the penis

PURPOSE

To review the evidence for radiotherapy in the management of primary penile cancer, either as brachytherapy or external beam radiation, and the role of external beam radiotherapy in node positive penile cancer.

METHODS

English language literature was reviewed for the past 3 decades. As penile cancer is uncommon in developed nations, high quality evidence to guide management is limited. Single institution reports often span decades during which time staging systems and treatments have evolved, reducing their relevance to current practice. Successful clinical trials require collaboration not only among disciplines but also among multiple institutions and nations.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy is a definitive organ-preserving option for T1-T2 penile cancers. Interstitial brachytherapy is associated with penile preservation in 85% of men at 5 years, maintained in 70% by 10 years. Results of external radiotherapy are not quite as promising but nonetheless 60% of men will have an intact penis at 5 years. Inguino-pelvic external radiotherapy has been reported to increase overall survival when delivered as adjuvant treatment for men with pN3 groin but pN0 pelvic nodes, and improve disease specific survival for those with involved pelvic nodes. InPACT (ECOG-ACRIN_8134) is investigating the role of inguino-pelvic chemo-radiotherapy for men with pN3 inguinal nodes but imaging negative pelvic nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy has a well-defined role to play in treatment of squamous cell cancers of other sites, such as vulva, anal canal, uterine cervix and head and neck malignancies. Emerging data support the incorporation of radiotherapy into treatment paradigms for penile cancer.

High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as an Organ-Sparing Treatment for Early Penile Cancer

BACKGROUND

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective organ-sparing treatment for patients with early-stage penile cancer. However, only limited data are available on the role of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in this clinical setting.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2020, 31 patients with early penile cancer were treated at our center with interstitial HDR BT at a dose of 18 × 3 Gy twice daily. A breast brachytherapy template was used for the fixation of stainless hollow needles.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 117.5 months (range, 5-210). Eight patients (25.8%) developed a recurrence; of these, seven were salvaged by partial amputation. Six patients died of internal comorbidities or a second cancer. The probability of local control at 5 and 10 years was 80.7% (95% CI: 63.7-97.7%) and 68.3% (95% CI: 44.0-92.6%), respectively. Cause-specific survival was 100%. Only one case of radiation-induced necrosis was observed. The probability of penile sparing at 5 and 10 years was 80.6% (95% CI: 63.45-97.7%) and 62.1% (95% CI: 34.8-89.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that HDR-BT for penile cancer can achieve results comparable to LDR-BT with organ sparing. Despite the relatively large patient cohort-the second largest reported to date in this clinical setting-prospective data from larger samples are needed to confirm the role of HDR-BT in penile cancer.

Novel portable apparatus for outpatient high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in penile cancer

BACKGROUND

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSC) is traditionally treated with surgical resection with significant morbidity. Penile sparing approaches, such as brachytherapy, require expertise, prolonged inpatient stays, poor patient convenience, and heterogenous plans with variable long-term toxicity. In this study, we describe the protocol for novel portable apparatus created for PSC, allowing outpatient hybrid interstitial/surface brachytherapy, improving homogeneity and patient convenience.

METHODS

A portable brachytherapy apparatus was developed utilizing a foley catheter, prostate template, 6F interstitial catheters, 5 mm bolus, and a jock strap. The apparatus allowed for internal and external catheter placement housed in a jock strap to allow mobility and defecation without affecting the implant. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed as an outpatient.

RESULTS

The apparatus was then used on a 62-year-old male with cT2pN0M0 (stage IIA) PSC with bilateral glans and urethral meatus involvement, who elected for definitive brachytherapy (4000cGy in 10 fractions over 5-days). Given external dwell positions, heterogeneity correction of the template was calculated (AAPM TG186) with <2% variation. Patient had minimal impact on his active lifestyle during treatment and had complete clinical response at 3-months. Grade 2 skin desquamation resolved at 2-months, with no necrosis. At 6-months, he was able to resume sexual intercourse, and at 12-months, he remained disease-free with sexual and urinary function intact.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel portable implant allows for improved patient convenience, reduced inpatient stay, capable of optimizing dosimetry with hybrid brachytherapy. This outpatient treatment allows the opportunity to increase fractionation, offering high local-control and lower toxicity. Future studies utilizing this apparatus for more fractionated regimens with further lower dose-per-fraction (∼3 Gy/fraction) is recommended.

Updates in the use of radiotherapy in the management of primary and locally-advanced penile cancer

Objective

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy in most developed countries, but may represent a significant oncologic challenge in certain African, Asian, and South American regions. Various treatment approaches have been described in penile cancer, including radiotherapy. This review aimed to provide a synopsis of radiotherapy use in penile cancer management and the associated toxicities. In addition, we aimed to discuss palliative radiation for metastases to the penis and provide a brief overview of how tumor biology may assist with treatment decision-making.

Methods

Peer-reviewed manuscripts related to the treatment of penile cancer with radiotherapy were evaluated by a PubMed search (1960–2021) in order to assess its role in the definitive and adjuvant settings. Selected manuscripts were also evaluated for descriptions of radiation-related toxicity.

Results

Though surgical resection of the primary is an excellent option for tumor control, select patients may be treated with organ-sparing radiotherapy by either external beam radiation or brachytherapy. Data from randomized controlled trials comparing radiotherapy and surgery are lacking, and thus management is frequently determined by institutional practice patterns and available expertise. Similarly, this lack of clinical trial data leads to divergence in opinion regarding lymph node management. This is further complicated in that many cited studies evaluating lymph node radiotherapy used non-modern radiotherapy delivery techniques. Groin toxicity from either surgery or radiotherapy remains a challenging problem and further risk assessment is needed to guide intensification with multi-modal therapy. Intrinsic differences in tumor biology, based on human papillomavirus infection, may help aid future prognostic and predictive models in patient risk stratification or treatment approach.

Conclusion

Penile cancer is a rare disease with limited clinical trial data driving the majority of treatment decisions. As a result, the goal of management is to effectively treat the disease while balancing the importance of quality of life through integrated multidisciplinary discussions. More international collaborations and interrogations of penile cancer biology are needed to better understand this disease and improve patient outcomes.

What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes

Context

The primary lesion in penile cancer is managed by surgery or radiation. Surgical options include penile-sparing surgery, amputative surgery, laser excision, and Moh’s micrographic surgery. Radiation is applied as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. The treatment aims to completely remove the primary lesion and preserve a sufficient functional penile stump.

Objective

To assess whether the 5-yr recurrence-free rate and other outcomes, such as sexual function, quality of life, urination, and penile preserving length, vary between various treatment options.

Evidence acquisition

The EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane HTA, DARE, HEED), Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for publications from 1990 through May 2021. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included.

Evidence synthesis

The systematic review included 88 studies, involving 9578 men from 16 NRCSs and 72 CSs. The cumulative mean 5-yr recurrence-free rates were 82.0% for penile-sparing surgery, 83.9% for amputative surgery, 78.6% for brachytherapy, 55.2% for EBRT, 69.4% for lasers, and 88.2% for Moh’s micrographic surgery, as reported from CSs, and 76.7% for penile-sparing surgery and 93.3% for amputative surgery, as reported from NRCSs. Penile surgery affects sexual function, but amputative surgery causes more appearance concerns. After brachytherapy, 25% of patients reported sexual dysfunction. Both penile-sparing surgery and amputative surgery affect all aspects of psychosocial well-being.

Conclusions

Despite the poor quality of evidence, data suggest that penile-sparing surgery is not inferior to amputative surgery in terms of recurrence rates in selected patients. Based on the available information, however, broadly applicable recommendations cannot be made; appropriate patient selection accounts for the relative success of all the available methods.

Patient summary

We reviewed the evidence of various techniques to treat penile tumor and assessed their effectiveness in oncologic control and their functional outcomes. Penile-sparing as well as amputative surgery is an effective treatment option, but amputative surgery has a negative impact on sexual function. Penile-sparing surgery and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, but preserve sexual function and quality of life better. Laser and Moh’s micrographic surgery could be used for smaller lesions.

High-dose rate brachytherapy in localized penile cancer: 5-Year clinical outcome analysis

•

Penile cancer is a rare tumor.

•

The organ preservation perspective makes the treatment challenging.

•

For early stage, conservative brachytherapy achieved excellent oncological outcome.

•

Conservative brachytherapy reported encouraging functional results.

•

HDR brachytherapy represents an attractive therapeutic option.

Purpose

To analyze the oncological outcome and toxicity profile after conservative treatment based on multicatheter interstitial high-dose rate brachytherapy (MHB) for patients presenting a localized penile cancer.

Materials and methods

Patients with histologically proven, non-metastatic (T1-T2 N0-N2 M0) localized penile cancer were treated with MHB. Needles were placed under general anesthesia into the target volume using a dedicated template. Treatment planning was performed using a post-implant CT-scan to deliver 35 Gy or 39 Gy (9f, 5d) for adjuvant or definitive treatment respectively. Five-year oncological outcome was evaluated with local relapse-free (LRFS), regional relapse-free (RRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS), specific (SS) and overall survival (OS). In pre-treatment and follow-up consultations, skin, urinary and sexual toxicities were investigated using CTCAEv4.0 classification, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function 5-items (IIEF-5). Dosimetry data were also analyzed.

Results

From 03/2006 to 05/2020, with a median follow-up of 72.4 months [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], 29 pts, mainly T1 (75.9%) and N0 (89.7%), underwent MHB. Eleven (38%) and 18 pts (62%) received MHB as adjuvant or definitive treatment respectively. Five-year LRFS, RRFS, MFS, SS and OS were 82%, 82%, 89%, 88% and 73% respectively. Six patients (20.7%) experienced local relapse and underwent salvage penectomy leading to a penile preservation rate of 79.3%. Acute skin toxicity was reported 1 month after MHB, with 28% G1, 66% G2 and 6% G3. Late skin complications were telangiectasia for 5 pts (17%) and necrosis for 3 pts (10.3% requiring hyperbaric oxygen therapy). Comparing pre- and post-treatment status, no significant change was observed for skin appearance, IPSS and IIEF-5.

Conclusion

MHB represents an efficient first line conservative treatment option for early penile cancers. Oncological outcome and late toxicity profile appear encouraging. However, larger-scale cohorts with longer follow-up are needed to more accurately precise the features of the best candidate to MHB.

Organ preserving radiation strategies for penile cancer

INTRODUCTION

The majorities of penile cancers are of squamous cell origin and thus are amenable to treatment and cure by radiation. Despite the move toward penile sparing strategies, radiation remains an under-utilized and often neglected option. This paper will review the various radio-therapeutic approaches for penile cancer and the literature supporting their use. English, French and Spanish literature on penile cancer was reviewed for the past 5 decades and classified according to modality: external beam radiotherapy, interstitial brachytherapy and surface mold brachytherapy. Many series span several decades and include a wide range of stages, especially for external beam radiotherapy. Penile preservation obviously will depend on dose prescription and stage at treatment. Nonetheless, in general, penile sparing with external beam ranges from 36% to 66% at 5 years. For the selected patients appropriate for interstitial brachytherapy penile sparing is 77% to 87% at 5 years, decreasing to 70% at 10 years. Mold therapy is selected for those with very superficial disease and penile sparing is consequently higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of centers of excellence for the management of this uncommon disease is encouraged. The required surgical and radiotherapy skill sets cannot be expected to be available in all centers. A multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient will facilitate selection of optimal management from the outset.

Contemporary role of radiotherapy in the management of penile cancer

Penile cancer is a rare clinical entity that contributes to significant patient morbidity and mortality. Human papilloma virus (HPV) plays an important role in the carcinogenesis of penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), is associated with improved clinical outcomes, and is predictive for response to treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Historically, treatment consisted of radical surgery with partial or total penectomy. While effective for local control, surgical resection can impart significant physical, psychological and sexual dysfunction for afflicted men. Organ preservation strategies offer significant quality of life advantages over standard surgery and can be utilized without compromising oncological control. As an alternative or adjunct to surgical resection, radiation therapy can be used for organ preservation strategies successfully in up to 70% of patients. A variety of treatment techniques can be employed depending on the location and burden of disease. Limited disease can be amenable to treatment with interstitial brachytherapy, surface mold plesiotherapy or external beam radiotherapy. For locally advanced presentations, or for patients not amenable to surgical resection, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved using a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Here, we discuss the management of penile SCC using modern radiation therapy treatment techniques, the expected clinical outcomes for organ preservation, as well as the management of side-effects and toxicities. While large randomized trials are being developed, the management of penile cancer is informed from the management of other of other anogenital malignancies, which we also review.

Comparison of efficacy between brachytherapy and penectomy in patients with penile cancer: a meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of brachytherapy and penectomy in patients with penile cancer. We searched the published articles in the PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases up to March 20, 2017. Twenty-two studies entered the final analyses. We used five-year overall survival rate, five-year local control rate, disease-free progression and lymph node positive rate to assess the efficacy. The meta-analysis found that patients who received penectomy had higher five-year local control rate (85% vs 80%, odds ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.90), five-year disease-free progression rate (77% vs 72%, odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.63–0.93) and lymph node positive rates (24% vs 20%, odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.98) than brachytherapy. No significant difference was observed for two group in five-year overall survival rate (76% vs 74%, odds ratios = 1.11 with the 95% confidence interval: 0.91–1.36). Both of penectomy and brachytherapy can improve the survival status. Penectomy provided better control efficacy, and not improved the survival status compared with brachytherapy solely. However, further research was required because of retrospective nature and potential bias of the data.

Low-dose brachytherapy for early stage penile cancer: a 20-year single-institution study (73 patients)

Purpose/objectives

The aim of this study is to analyze the results of exclusive interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) as a conservative approach in the treatment of penile cancer confined to the glans or the shaft with long-term follow-up in a single institution.

Materials/methods

Between July 1992 and November 2013, 73 consecutive patients with non-metastatic invasive penile cancer were treated by Low dose rate (LDR) IBT in our institution. The localization of the primary lesion was glands in 67 patients (91.8 %) and shaft in 6 patients (8.2 %). All 73 patients presented with squamous cell carcinoma with grades of differentiation as follows: 34 patients with grade 1 (44.7 %), 9 patients with grade 2 (11.8 %), 9 patients with grade 3 (11.8 %) and 21 patients unknown (28.8 %). Six patients (7.8 %) presented with in situ carcinoma, 55 patients (75,3 %) presented with T1, 11 patients (15 %) presented with T2, and one patient (1.3 %) presented with Tx. Inguinal nodal dissection was performed in 29 patients (38.2 %); 13 patients (17.8 %) presented with histologically confirmed positive ganglion. After circumcision, IBT was performed using a hypodermic needle. The median dose delivered was 60 Gy (range, 40 to 70 Gy). The median activity of the iridium-192 wire was 1.12 mCi/cm, and the median reference isodose rate was 0.4 Gy/h (range, 0.2–1.2). Patients with histological inguinal metastases received external beam radiotherapy to the selected inguinal affected area with a median dose of 45 Gy (30–55 Gy).

Results

The median follow-up time was 51.8 months (range 34.4 to 68.7). The 5-year overall survival was 82.0 %, with eight deaths from cancer and five non-cancer-related deaths. Disease-specific survival was 91.4 %, relapse-free survival was 64.4 %, and local relapse-free survival as 74 %. Total or partial penile preservation was 87.9 % at 5-years. Complications rates at 5 years were 6.6 % urethral stenosis (five patients), two patients (2.6 %) with pain related to sexual intercourse and four patients (5.3 %) with dysuria grade 2. Five patients (6.8 %) required penile amputation for necrosis.

Conclusions

IBT provides good local control with organ preservation, excellent tolerance and low complication rates in early-stage penile cancers.

Organ-sparing treatment of penile cancer with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy

AIM

To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of protocol-based interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy for penile carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From August 2002 to February 2014, 13 men with penile cancer were treated by interstitial brachytherapy. The tumor stage was T1 for eight patients, T2 for four patients, and T3 for one patient. The tumor grade was well differentiated for five patients and moderately differentiated for seven patients, while it was unknown for one patient. Lymph node staging was positive for three of 13 patients. All patients were treated using interstitial PDR brachytherapy with dose specifications according to the Paris system. For data collection of erectile dysfunction, the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire was used, supplemented by the follow-up data.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 54.0 months (range, 13-155 months). Only one patient (1/13, 7.7 %) with local failure was documented. At 5 and 10 years, the local cumulative recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and the cancer-specific survival rates were 12.5 % (95 % CI, 80.4-119.6), 80.8 % (95 % CI, 75.2-124.8), and 77.9 % (95 % CI, 74.3-125.7), respectively. At the time of analysis, nine of 13 men were alive; two of 13 men died of distant metastases from the tumor and two for other reasons with no sign of cancer disease. Serious late side effects such as soft tissue necrosis occurred in four of 13 patients (30 %) and all were successfully treated with medication. Mutilating salvage surgery was not necessary in any of the cases. Urethral stenosis was documented for two of 13 (15.4 %) and dysuria occurred in four of 13 patients (30.8 %). Eight of 11 men (72.7 %) never or only sometimes had erectile dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, interstitial PDR brachytherapy of penile cancer is effective as an organ-sparing treatment. It yields satisfactory results for the conservation of sexual function.

Evaluation of sexual functions and sexual behaviors after penile brachytherapy in men treated for penile carcinoma

Purpose

To assess sexual functions and behaviors of men treated by penile brachytherapy for a cancer of the penis.

Materials and methods

Thirty eight men (19 patients treated by penile brachytherapy for a cancer of the penis and 19 age paired-matched controls) participated in a survey about sexuality. The mean age of patients and controls were 73.2 +/- 11.7 and 70.0 +/- 10.5 years, respectively (NS). Controls were men without penile pathology, without history of cancer and no evidence of cognitive impairment. All agreed to participate in the survey about sexuality using 2 questionnaires : the IIEF questionnaire, which explores 4 domains of sexual functions, namely erection, satisfaction, orgasm and desire, and a questionnaire created using the BASIC IDEA grid, which addresses nine domains: behavior, affect, sensation, self-image, cognition, interpersonal, drugs, expectation and attitude.

Results

Patients had better scores than controls in 3 domains of the IIEF: erection, desire and satisfaction. These results contrasted with the frequency of intercourse and the quality of erection (evaluated through the BASIC IDEA questionnaire) that were not significantly different between the two populations. Patients also had significantly higher frequency of masturbation (p <0.001) lower worry about sexual performance and higher expected satisfaction for future life (p: 0.021) than controls.

Conclusion

Penile brachytherapy is a treatment of cancer of the penis that seems to have a moderated impact on sexual functions since most of sexual scores are not inferior in these patients than in age pair-matched controls.

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for T1-T2-stage penile carcinoma: short-term results

PURPOSE

Interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) is a preferred treatment option over partial penectomy in selected patients with T1-T2-stage penile carcinoma because of its organ preservation ability. Literature is mostly based on the use of low-dose-rate IBT, and experience with high-dose-rate (HDR) IBT is extremely limited. We studied the role of HDR-IBT alone in patients with T1-T2-stage penile carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 2010 and July 2013, 14 patients with T1-T2-stage penile carcinoma were treated with HDR-IBT at our center. Size of the primary lesion ranged from 1.5 to 4.0cm. A two-to-four-plane free-hand implant was performed using plastic catheters. The prescribed dose of HDR-IBT was 42-51Gy in 14-17 fractions using twice-a-day fractionation schedule. Patients were followed up regularly for assessment of local control, survival, toxicity, and sexual function.

RESULTS

At a median followup of 22 months, 2 patients developed recurrent disease at locoregional site. The 3-year overall survival was 83% with penis preservation rate of 93%. All patients developed acute Grade III skin toxicity that healed during 6-8-weeks time. Urethral stenosis and soft tissue necrosis was not seen in any of the patients. A total of 4 patients experienced mild asymptomatic fibrosis in the implanted area. Around 10 patients had satisfactory sexual function status at the last followup visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it was a small sample size, our results have demonstrated excellent local control rate and acceptable toxicity with HDR-IBT in patients with T1-T2-stage penile carcinoma.

High-dose rate brachytherapy in localized penile cancer: short-term clinical outcome analysis

Purpose

To assess clinical outcomes of high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (HIB) in localized penile carcinoma.

Material and methods

From 03/2006 to 08/2013, patients with biopsy-proven T1-T2 (<4 cm) non-metastatic localized penile squamous cell carcinoma underwent HIB. Under general anaesthesia, after Foley catheter placement, needles were placed in the target volume using a dedicated template. Planification was carried out with a post-implant CT-scan to deliver a total dose of 36 Gy in 9 fractions over 5 days (in adjuvant setting) or 39 Gy in 9 fractions over 5 days (as monotherapy). Dose-volume adaptation was manually achieved using graphical optimization. Dosimetric data and clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Toxicities were graded using the CTC v4.0.

Results

With a median follow-up of 27 months [5.1-83], 12 patients including 8 T1a, 3 T1b and 1 T2 N0 underwent HIB (sole therapy: 11 pts; adjuvant: 1 pt). The actuarial 5-year relapse-free, cause-specific and overall survival rates were 83%, 100% and 78% respectively. Comparing pre and post treatment evaluation, no IPSS or IIEF-5 changes were reported. Dermatitis was reported systematically 1 month after HIB including 6 G1, 5 G2 and 1 G3. Only 1 experienced long-term G3 successfully treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. One urethral meatus stenosis G3 required meatotomy.

Conclusion

In selected patients with T1-T2 localized penile cancer, HIB may be considered as an optional conservative therapy. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these encouraging preliminary results.

Brachytherapy for penile cancer: efficacy and impact on sexual function

PURPOSE

Penis brachytherapy (PB) remains an alternative in the cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the oncologic outcomes, sexual function, and the sexual behavior of men treated by PB for a cancer of the penis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1992 and 2009, 47 patients with a cancer of the penis were treated by PB ((192)Ir), in the Toulouse, Montpellier, and Barcelona cancer centers. The investigation into their sexuality was obtained by means of questionnaire. A total of 21 French patients were approached, of whom 19 (mean age=73.2 years) agreed to answer the questionnaire (participation rate=90.5%).

RESULTS

Oncologic data: The specific survival and the disease-free survival at 5 years was 87.6% (95% confidence interval, 72.4-94.7%) and 84% (95% confidence interval, 57.6-94.7%), respectively. The rate of preservation of the penis was 66% (n=31). Sexual data: Among the 17 patients sexually active before brachytherapy, 10 patients remained sexually active after treatment (58.8%). Of the 18 patients who had erections before PB, 17 still had them after treatment (94.4%). Age was the main predictive factor.

CONCLUSION

The PB seems to have a moderated impact on the sexual functions and the sexual behavior of the patients.

Cancer du pénis au Sénégal : aspects cliniques et thérapeutiques

Buts

décrire les aspects cliniques et thérapeutiques des cancers de la verge au Sénégal.

Patients et méthodes

nous avons effectué une étude rétrospective qui s’est intéressée aux dossiers des patients suivis pour cancer de la verge au service d’urologie du CHU Aristide Le Dantec entre janvier 2000 et décembre 2011.

Résultats

huit patients d’âge moyen de 51,5 ans avec des extrêmes de 27 à 77 ans ont été répertoriés. Ils étaient tous circoncis dans l’enfance. L’examen clinique avait mis en évidence une tumeur ulcérobourgeonnante intéressant le gland et une partie du corps de la verge dans cinq cas; dans deux cas, elle intéressait la totalité de la verge alors que seul un cas était limité au gland. Les patients étaient ainsi classés selon le système TNM 2002 de l’UICC en cT2 (quatre cas), cT3 (trois cas) et cT1 (un cas). Le type histologique de la tumeur était le carcinome épidermoïde chez tous les patients. Il n’y avait pas de localisation secondaire au scanner thoracoabdomino-pelvien. Sur le plan thérapeutique, une pénectomie partielle a été réalisée dans cinq cas, une pénectomie totale avec curage ganglionnaire dans un cas. Deux patients ont refusé le traitement chirurgical. Aucune récidive n’était notée chez les cinq patients ayant subi une amputation partielle du pénis. La survie globale était donc de 83,3 % pour les patients opérés.

Conclusion

le cancer de la verge est rare au Sénégal. La prise en charge est délicate du fait du diagnostic tardif avec des lésions évoluées, d’où l’importance d’une sensibilisation des populations.

High-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of penile carcinoma--first experience

PURPOSE

Interstitial low-dose rate brachytherapy (BRT) allows a conservative treatment of T1-T2 penile carcinoma. High-dose rate (HDR) BRT is often considered as a dangerous method for interstitial implants because of higher risk of complications. However, numerous reports suggest that results of HDR-BRT may be comparable to low-dose rate BRT. There are no data available in the literature regarding HDR interstitial BRT for carcinoma of the penis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with early penile carcinoma were treated by interstitial hyperfractionated HDR-BRT at the dose of 18 times 3Gy twice daily between years 2002 and 2009. Breast interstitial BRT template was used for fixation and precise geometry reconstruction of stainless hollow needles.

RESULTS

Median followup was 20 months. Our BRT technique and fractionation schedule was well tolerated by all patients. Acute reaction consisted predominantly of penis edema and Grade 2 radiation mucositis that dissolved during 8 weeks after the treatment. We neither observed any postradiation necrosis nor urethral stenosis. The worst late side effects recorded were mild telanagiectasias in the treatment region. At the last followup, all patients were alive without evidence of the tumor and with fully functional organ.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperfractionated interstitial HDR-BRT with 18 times 3 Gy per fraction twice daily is a promising method in selected patients of penile carcinoma and deserves further evaluation in a larger prospective study.

The efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of medically refractory soft tissue necrosis after penile brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Soft tissue necrosis is reported in up to 26% of patients undergoing radiotherapy for penile cancer. Management options include local irrigation, wound debridement, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory medication, and analgesics. Refractory lesions may be treated with partial penectomy. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) has a well-defined role in the treatment of late radiation toxicities. We present experience with HBO for medically refractory soft tissue necrosis after penile brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 2001 to January 2009, 7 men of 43 treated with penile brachytherapy for squamous carcinoma developed refractory soft tissue necrosis and were treated with HBO. All had received a prescribed dose of 60 Gy through interstitial brachytherapy using Paris system guidelines. All had failed conservative medical therapies for soft tissue necrosis.

RESULTS

Median age was 55 years (range, 35-72 years). Comorbidities potentially effecting wound healing included hypertension (2), current smokers (5), former smoker (1) but no diabetes mellitus, or peripheral vascular disease. Median time between completion of brachytherapy and appearance of soft tissue necrosis was 13 months (range, 9-24 months) and the median interval before starting HBO was 7.5 months (range, 3-13 months). The median number of "dives" per HBO course was 40 (30-53). All 7 experienced an excellent response with healing of the necrosis and resolution of symptoms, although 3 required an additional course, 2 for consolidation of healing, and 1 for a relapse 4 months later. No patient was submitted to penectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

HBO should be considered as a treatment option in patients with refractory soft tissue necrosis of the penis after brachytherapy.

Penile cancer

This is an overview of current approaches in prevention, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and follow-up of penile cancer, with a particular perspective on elderly patients. Specific biologic and histologic features of penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the elderly are reported, focusing on the more typical precancerous and accompanying lesions occurring in these patients. Conservative approaches in early disease are discussed as well as timing of lymph-node dissection (LND), the possible innovative role of dynamic sentinel node identification, and treatment modalities for (locally or metastatic) advanced disease. If issues concerning conservative options are probably simpler in elderly patients who are not often interested in aesthetic and function preservation, problems can arise when facing more advanced disease, which is aggressive independently of age and deserves the best available treatment. Caution is advised in administering multimodal therapy that can have severe toxicity in elderly people.

Penile brachytherapy: technical aspects and postimplant issues

PURPOSE

Squamous carcinoma (SCC) of the penis affects about 1 in 100,000 men in western societies. Interstitial brachytherapy can be an effective penis-conserving modality for T1, T2, and selected T3 tumors. Unfortunately, few radiation oncology trainees have the opportunity to treat a case of penile cancer during their residency, and few centers have brachytherapy expertise for this tumor site. We report our technique that has been developed and refined over the past 20 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1989 to 2009, we have been using brachytherapy to treat penile SCC and have experience with 75 cases. From 1989 to 1998, manual afterloading was used with (192)Ir wire or seeds, and from 1999 to the present, pulse dose rate automated afterloading. Sixty Gray is delivered over a period of 4-5 days.

RESULTS

Patient selection for penile brachytherapy and the technical and dosimetric aspects of the procedure will be discussed along with posttreatment care and followup.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy is an effective treatment for T1, T2, and selected T3 SCC of the penis. Efficacy depends on careful planning and appreciation of dosimetry.

A dramatic case of genital radionecrosis

BACKGROUND

Epidermoid carcinoma of the penis presents in 1% of malignant tumors in men. Penis cancer treatment has traditionally been total or partial amputation. There are authors who consider radiation to be part of penis cancer treatment in select cases--especially the use of brachytherapy and external radiation.

CLINICAL CASE

The case of a 48-year-old male who in 2004 presented with an ulcerated lesion of the penis that was left unattended to is presented. Two years later, he sought medical attention and physical examination revealed an ulcerated penile lesion with poorly defined edges and limited to the glans.

DIAGNOSIS

The lesion was biopsied and the histopathological study reported Epidermoid Carcinoma. After radiological studies, it was classified as stage T2-N0-M0.

TREATMENT

Total penectomy without lymphadenectomy was performed. The patient received adjuvant treatment of 15 sessions of cobalt radiation treatment at a dose of 3,500 cGy. Six months later, the patient noticed the presence of erythema at the genital and inguinal level which later ulcerated and extended toward the perineum. The disease progressed tragically and the patient died 2 years later.

Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update

OBJECTIVES

Squamous carcinoma of the penis is rare but psychologically devastating and potentially fatal. Radiotherapy offers a penile-conserving treatment option without jeopardizing cure. We have used primary penile brachytherapy as the treatment of choice for T1, T2 and selected T3 patients since 1989 and present updated results for 67 patients.

METHODS

Mean age was 60 years (range 22-93). Stage was T1 in 56%, T2: 33%, T3: 8%, and Tx: 3%. Grade was moderate or poorly differentiated in 48%. In Toronto after-loading pulse dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (n = 41) was used for all treatments while Ottawa used manually loaded Iridium(192) (n = 26). Two or three parallel planes of needles (median 6) were inserted using pre-drilled lucite templates for guidance and fixation; 60 Gy was delivered over 4-5 days.

RESULTS

Median follow-up is 4 years (range 0.2-16.2). At 10 years, actuarial overall survival is 59%, cause specific survival 83.6%. Nine men died of penile cancer and eight of other causes with no evidence of recurrence. Penectomy was required for eight local failures and two necroses, for an actuarial penile preservation rate at 5 years of 88% and 10 years of 67%. The soft tissue necrosis rate is 12% and the urethral stenosis rate 9%. Six of 11 regional failures were salvaged by lymph node dissection +/- external radiation. The other five all had concurrent distant failure and died of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy is an effective treatment for T1, T2 and selected T3 SCC of the penis. Close follow-up is mandatory as local failures and many regional failures can be salvaged by surgery.

[Organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer]

In patients with penile cancer health-related quality of life is closely related to organ-sparing surgery. To achieve an ideally suited treatment modality for this rare but aggressive tumor entity different operating techniques like micrographic surgery, laser treatment, and glansectomy were developed. These should offer optimal oncological treatment while preserving sexual function. This article gives an overview of indications and limits of organ-sparing treatment in penile cancer.

Treatment of penile carcinoma: To cut or not to cut?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome in patients with penile cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 60 patients with penile carcinoma were included. Of the patients, 45 (n = 27) underwent surgery, and 51 underwent definitive (n = 29) or postoperative (n = 22) radiotherapy (RT). Median follow-up was 62 months.

RESULTS

Median time to locoregional relapse was 14 months. Local failure was observed in 3 of 23 patients (13%) treated with surgery with or without postoperative RT vs. in 19 of 33 patients (56%) given organ-sparing treatment (p = 0.0008). Of 22 local failures, 16 (73%) were salvaged with surgery. Of the 33 patients treated with definitive RT (n = 29) and the 4 patients refusing RT after excisional biopsy, local control was obtained with organ preservation in 13 (39%). In the remaining 20, 4 patients with local failure underwent salvage conservatively, resulting in an ultimate penis preservation rate of 17 of 33 (52%) patients treated with definitive RT. The 5-year and 10-year probability of surviving with an intact penis was 43% and 26%, respectively. There was no survival difference between the patients treated with definitive RT and primary surgery (56% vs. 53%; p = 0.16). In multivariate analysis, independent factors influencing survival were N-classification and pathologic grade. Surgery was the only independent predictor for better local control.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study findings, in patients with penile cancer, local control is superior with surgery. However, there is no difference in survival between patients treated with surgery and those treated with definitive RT, with 52% organ preservation.

External-beam radiotherapy in T1-2 N0 penile carcinoma

AIMS

To review the outcome of 41 patients with invasive carcinoma of the penis treated with external-beam radiotherapy using a consistent technique and dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with carcinoma of the penis treated at Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK, between 1995 and 2000 were reviewed retrospectively. Radiotherapy was delivered using 4 MV linear accelerators with a dose of 50 Gy or 52.5 Gy in 16 fractions over 22 days.

RESULTS

The distribution of patients according to stage was T1=37, T2=4, N0=40, N3=1. Median follow-up was 4.5 years. The local control rate was 62%, nodal relapse-free rate of 88%, relapse-free rate of 51% and overall survival of 88% at 5 years. All recurrences were salvaged by surgery. Penile ulceration occurred in 8% and urethral stenosis requiring dilatation in 29%. There were no penectomies for penile necrosis.

CONCLUSION

EBXRT may be offered for T1-2 cancer of the penis with close surveillance to detect local recurrences early for salvage surgery without jeopardising overall survival. It remains an alternative option to penis-preserving surgery and should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting and with the patient.

What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical excision margin required for local oncological control in primary penile cancers, as patients with penile cancer who undergo radical amputation suffer marked psychological, functional and cosmetic sequelae, and although organ-sparing surgery has improved the quality of life of these men, the optimum surgical excision margin to achieve oncological control is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 51 patients (mean age 61 years) diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis between May 2000 and December 2004 were selected for treatment with conservative surgical techniques. All patients were staged before surgery using magnetic resonance imaging. Histopathological features of the tumours, including type, grade, stage and distance from the surgical excision margin, were evaluated. All patients were followed in the outpatient department according to European Association of Urology guidelines.

RESULTS

The median (range) follow-up of the men was 26 (2-55) months. Patients were treated by wide localized excision (nine), glans excision (26) and partial penectomy (16). The histopathological review included the analysis of 102 surgical margins (deep and skin) with 49 (48%) measured within 10 mm of the tumour edge and 92 (90%) within a <20-mm resection margin. Three patients (6%) had tumour involvement at the surgical margin and had further surgery. During follow-up two patients (4%) developed local tumour recurrence and were treated successfully with partial penectomy.

CONCLUSION

A traditional 2-cm excision margin is unnecessary for treating squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Conservative techniques, involving excision margins of only a few millimetres, appear to offer excellent oncological control.

Penile brachytherapy: results for 49 patients

PURPOSE

To report results for 49 men with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis treated with primary penile interstitial brachytherapy at one of two institutions: the Ottawa Regional Cancer Center, Ottawa, and the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From September 1989 to September 2003, 49 men (mean age, 58 years; range, 22-93 years) had brachytherapy for penile SCC. Fifty-one percent of tumors were T1, 33% T2, and 8% T3; 4% were in situ and 4% Tx. Grade was well differentiated in 31%, moderate in 45%, and poor in 2%; grade was unspecified for 20%. One tumor was verrucous. All tumors in Toronto had pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (n = 23), whereas those in Ottawa had either Iridium wire (n = 22) or seeds (n = 4). Four patients had a single plane implant with a plastic tube technique, and all others had a volume implant with predrilled acrylic templates and two or three parallel planes of needles (median, six needles). Mean needle spacing was 13.5 mm (range, 10-18 mm), mean dose rate was 65 cGy/h (range, 33-160 cGy/h), and mean duration was 98.8 h (range, 36-188 h). Dose rates for PDR brachytherapy were 50-61.2 cGy/h, with no correction in total dose, which was 60 Gy in all cases.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 33.4 months (range, 4-140 months). At 5 years, actuarial overall survival was 78.3% and cause-specific survival 90.0%. Four men died of penile cancer, and 6 died of other causes with no evidence of recurrence. The cumulative incidence rate for never having experienced any type of failure at 5 years was 64.4% and for local failure was 85.3%. All 5 patients with local failure were successfully salvaged by surgery; 2 other men required penectomy for necrosis. The soft tissue necrosis rate was 16% and the urethral stenosis rate 12%. Of 8 men with regional failure, 5 were salvaged by lymph node dissection with or without external radiation. All 4 men with distant failure died of disease. Of 49 men, 42 had an intact and tumor-free penis at last follow-up or death. The actuarial penile preservation rate at 5 years was 86.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy is an effective treatment for T1, T2, and selected T3 SCC of the penis. Close follow-up is mandatory because local failures and many regional failures can be salvaged by surgery.

Natural history, management, and surveillance of recurrent squamous cell penile carcinoma:

For men with penile carcinoma, surveillance strategies may be tailored to the risks of local and regional recurrence, which vary according to the pathologic characteristics of the primary tumor and the modalities employed for local therapy (phallus sparing or extirpative) and regional therapy (surveillance or lymphadenectomy). Men at a higher risk for local or regional recurrence who should have more rigorous follow-up include those (1) treated with phallus-sparing strategies such as laser ablation, topical therapies, or radiotherapy; (2) patients with clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes who are managed without lymphadenectomy despite high-risk primary tumors (pT2-3, grade 3, vascular invasion); and (3) those with lymph node metastases after lymphadenectomy. Good candidates for less-stringent surveillance include patients with low-risk primary tumors (pTis, pTa, pT1, grades 1-2) and those with negative inguinal nodes after lymphadenectomy whose primary tumors were managed with partial or total penectomy.

Advanced penile carcinoma

PURPOSE

In the United States penile carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy that represents only 0.4% of all male malignancies and 2% to 4% of genitourinary malignancies. Of penile cancer cases 30% are diagnosed with advanced disease. Improved understanding of the natural history, appropriate and accurate staging, and tailored, less morbid lymphadenectomy have led to improved survival and decreased the adverse effects of therapy. However, the management of advanced penile carcinoma remains a challenge to urological, medical and radiation oncologists. The rarity and paucity of well designed clinical studies of medical and/or surgical therapy for advanced penile cancer have hampered progress in the treatment of this disease. However, there is clear evidence that identifies active chemotherapy and radiation treatments. This review aims to provide the treating physician with an overview of available data for surgical, chemotherapeutic and radiation treatments, and provide guidelines for appropriate patient selection for these therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a detailed review of the available literature regarding advanced penile carcinoma to include its etiology, epidemiology, natural history, staging classification and treatment.

RESULTS

Penile carcinoma typically spreads along an echelon of nodal pathways that permits fairly accurate staging. Prognosis correlates well with clinical nodal status and grade, and the TNM classification developed by the UICC should be uniformly used by clinicians. Treatment recommendations are tightly associated with disease stage. Although tailored lymphadenectomy as currently recommended has greatly decreased morbidity, improved staging accuracy and improved treatment results, controversies still exist regarding the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with impalpable lymph node (cN0) disease, and the role and timing of pelvic lymphadenectomy. There is evidence of modest activity for chemotherapy in advanced penile carcinoma. Active agents include cisplatin, bleomycin and methotrexate. Combination chemotherapy regimens with promising activity and toxicity profiles include cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, and vincristine, bleomycin and methotrexate. Radiation in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy in advanced disease have also demonstrated activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The natural history of penile carcinoma and its proclivity to spread via regional lymphatics has been well defined. This understanding has led to the development of effective locoregional treatment strategies. Penile carcinoma is sensitive to radiation and certain chemotherapeutic agents. A threshold volume of nodal metastases is associated with significant mortality. The optimal application of these strategies remains to be determined. Improvements in survival and quality of life likely require the incorporation of multiple modalities into the treatment of advanced penile carcinoma. A multi-institutional, international effort is essential to perform appropriately powered clinical trials to advance the standard of care in this rare disease.

Treatment of localized carcinoma of the penis: a survey of current practice in the UK

Consensus opinion from published reports on the management of localized carcinoma of the penis recommends that patients with small, distal, non-poorly differentiated lesions should be offered penis-conserving treatment, while those with larger or more advanced lesions should be considered for amputative surgery. A questionnaire survey was sent to 289 urologists and 237 oncologists in the UK to assess their practice for the treatment of localized carcinoma of the penis. Consultants were asked to choose between penis-conserving surgery, amputation or radiotherapy as their preferred treatment for four examples of localized disease. Oncologists were also asked to indicate their preferred radiation modality (external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy). For treating a small lesion situated distally on the glans penis, 56.7% of urologists and 94.5% of oncologists preferred penis-conserving methods; 28.8% of urologists and one oncologist preferred partial or total amputation. In total, 43.2% of urologists would consider amputative surgery for this lesion compared with only 5.5% of oncologists. Only 23.3% of oncologists considered using brachytherapy. For a 4 cm lesion situated distally, the majority of urologists surveyed (82.0%) preferred amputative surgery, while the majority of oncologists (68.5%) preferred conservative treatment. For a 1.5 cm lesion extending on to the penile shaft, 68.5% of urologists preferred amputative surgery while 85.0% of oncologists preferred penis-conserving options. For a 4 cm lesion extending on to the shaft, the vast majority of urologists (86.5%) preferred amputation as treatment compared with only 36.9% of oncologists. The results of the survey suggested that clinicians tended to favour the treatment modality of which they have most experience. As such, urologists tended to prefer surgery while clinical oncologists tended to prefer radiotherapy, irrespective of the size and position of the primary tumour or consensus opinion. These results emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary clinics and site specialization, so that both clinicians and patients can make informed choices about optimal treatment, based on the knowledge of all available treatment options.

Interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancer: an alternative to amputation

PURPOSE

Interstitial brachytherapy is an effective organ sparing treatment for localized penile squamous cell carcinoma. We report results in 30 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 1989 to November 2000, 30 men with penile squamous cell carcinoma were treated with primary brachytherapy. Tumor size was 2 to 3 cm. in 8 and greater than 3 cm. in 14 (maximum 5 cm.). Tumor was well differentiated in 11 patients, moderately in 10, poorly in 2 and unspecified in 6. Histology was verrucous in 1 patient. All implants complied with the Paris system of dosimetry, 26 of 30 with rigid steel needles held in a 3-dimensional array. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy. delivered at an average dose rate of 68 cGy. hourly for an implant duration of 93 hours.

RESULTS

Median followup was 34 months. There have been 4 local failures yielding an actuarial local failure-free rate of 85% at 2 years (standard error 8%) and 76% at 5 years (11%). Each local failure was salvaged with penectomy (partial in 2 cases). There have been 4 isolated regional failures, involving 1 to 3 nodes, 3 moderately and 1 poorly differentiated, salvaged with groin dissection. Two patients with moderately differentiated T1 squamous cell carcinoma who died of metastatic disease after inoperable regional and subsequent distant failure. No well differentiated tumors failed regionally or distantly. Three men died of other causes with no evidence of recurrence. Function and cosmesis after implantation have been generally good. Some telangiectasia and pigmentation changes were common. Two men complained of loss of potency, 3 required dilatation for meatal stenosis and 1 underwent partial penectomy for radiation necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy provides excellent local control of T1 to T2 penile squamous cell carcinoma, with only 1 of 30 patients requiring partial penectomy for radionecrosis. Despite excellent local control, 50% of moderately or poorly differentiated tumors recurred distantly or regionally. We recommend planned staging superficial inguinal node dissection 3 months after implantation for moderately and/or poorly differentiated tumors with clinically negative groins.

Radiation therapy alone or combined surgery and radiation therapy in squamous-cell carcinoma of the penis?

To assess the prognostic factors and the outcome in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the penis, a retrospective review of 41 consecutive patients with non-metastatic invasive carcinoma of the penis, treated between 1962 and 1994, was performed. The median age was 59 years (range: 35-76 years). According to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) 1997 classification, there were 12 (29%) T1, 24 (59%) T2, 4 (10%) T3 and 1 TX (2%) tumours. The N-classification was distributed as follows: 29 (71%) patients with N0, 8 (20%) with N1, 3 (7%) with N2 and 1 (2%) with N3. Forty-four per cent (n=18) of the patients underwent surgery: partial penectomy with (n=4) or without (n=12) lymph node dissection, or total penectomy with (n=1) or without (n=1) lymph node dissection. 23 patients were treated with radiation therapy alone, and all but 4 of the patients who were operated upon received postoperative radiation therapy (n=14). The median follow-up period was 70 months (range 20-331 months). In a median period of 12 months (range 5-139 months), 63% (n=26) of the patients relapsed (local in 18, locoregional in 2, regional in 3 and distant in 3). Local failure (stump in the operated patients, and the tumour bed in those treated with primary radiation therapy) was observed in 4 out of 16 (25%) patients treated with partial penectomy +/-postoperative radiotherapy versus 14 out of 23 (61%) treated with primary radiotherapy (P=0.06). 15 (83%) out of 18 local failures were successfully salvaged with surgery. In all patients, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 57% (95% confidence interval (CI), 41-73%) and 38% (95% CI, 21-55%), respectively. The 5-year local and locoregional rates were 57% (95% CI, 41-73%) and 48% (95% CI, 32-64%), respectively. In patients treated with primary radiotherapy, 5- and 10-year probabilities of surviving with penis preservation were 36% (95% CI, 22-50%) and 18% (95% CI, 2-34%), respectively. In multivariate analyses, survival was significantly influenced by the N-classification, and surgery was the only independent factor predicting the locoregional control. We conclude that, in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the penis, local control is better in patients treated with surgery. However, there seems to be no difference in terms of survival between patients treated by surgery and those treated by primary radiotherapy +/-salvage surgery, with 39% having organ preservation.

Iridium-192 implantation for node-negative carcinoma of the penis: the Cookridge Hospital experience

Carcinoma of the penis is a rare tumour of the male urogenital tract, which may be treated by using several modalities. We present a single-centre experience of iridium-192 implantation. From 1980 to 1997, 31 patients with node-negative penile cancer were treated with an iridium-192 implant to the penis. A retrospective analysis of the case notes was made. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age at treatment was 61.5 years. Twenty-seven patients presented with Jackson Stage I disease and four with Stage II disease. They were treated with an iridium-192 implant to the penis after biopsy (n = 25) or tumour excision (n = 6), with a 'watch and wait' policy for inguinal nodes. Four patients did not complete their implantation treatment and had additional external beam radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 61.5 months. The primary tumour was controlled in 25 of 31 patients (80.6%) by the implant. In all but one patient with primary relapse, surgical salvage was successful, although one patient died of septicaemia 3 weeks after surgery. Nodes were the initial site of relapse in seven patients, with associated relapse in the primary in one. The actuarial 5-year survival rates were as follows: overall survival 69.0 %, disease-specific survival (corrected for intercurrent deaths) 85.4%, relapse-free survival 57.8% and local relapse-free survival 75.6%. One patient underwent amputation for necrosis and 11 of 25 patients (44%) who achieved penile conservation required dilatation for urethral stenosis. In conclusion, iridium-192 implantation is a successful method of treatment for penile cancer in terms of local control, with preservation of function in the majority of patients. In those who do relapse at the primary site, surgical salvage is usually possible.

Interstitial brachytherapy in carcinoma of the penis

AIM

Keeping in line with the increasing emphasis on organ preservation, we at the Tata Memorial Hospital have evaluated the role of Ir-192 interstitial implant as regards local control, functional and cosmetic outcome in early as well as locally recurrent carcinoma of the distal penis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 1988 to December 1996, 23 patients with histopathologically proven cancer of the penis were treated with radical radiation therapy using Ir-192 temporary interstitial implant. Our patients were in the age group of 20 to 60 years. The primary lesions were T1 in 7, T2 in 7 and recurrent in 9 patients. Only 7 patients had palpable groin nodes at presentation, all of which were pathologically negative. The median dose of implant was 50 Gy (range 40 to 60 Gy), using the LDR afterloading system and the Paris system of implant rules for dosimetry. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 117 months (median 24 months).

RESULTS

At last follow-up 18 of the 23 patients remained locally controlled with implant alone. Three patients failed only locally, 2 locoregionally and 1 only at the groin. Of the 5 patients who failed locally, 4 were successfully salvaged with partial penectomy and remained controlled when last seen. Local control with implant alone at 8 years was 70% by life table analysis. The patients had excellent functional and cosmetic outcome. We did not record any case of skin or soft-tissue necrosis. Only 2 patients developed meatal stenosis, both of which were treated endoscopically.

CONCLUSION

Our results lead us to interpret that interstitial brachytherapy with Ir-192 offers excellent local control rates with preservation of organ and function. Penectomy can be reserved as a means for effective salvage.

Treatment results and prognostic factors in 101 men treated for squamous carcinoma of the penis

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was performed to assess the treatment outcome and prognostic factors in 101 men with invasive squamous carcinoma of the penis treated at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 1960-1990.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The tumor was confined to the glans penis (T1) in 79 patients, 82 were node negative (N0), and two patients had distant metastases at presentation. The histology was Grade 1 (G1) in 36, Grade 2 (G2) in 18, Grade 3 (G3) in 28, and unknown in 19 patients. Node-positive disease was commoner in patients with G3 (p = 0.02) or T2/3/4 tumors (p = 0.007). Treatment for the primary tumor was external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 59, interstitial brachytherapy in 13, and partial or total penectomy in 29 patients. The median dose, dose/fraction, and treatment time for EBRT was 60 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction, and 46 days, respectively. Eighty patients received no inguinal node treatment, 13 had EBRT (4 with chemotherapy), and 8 underwent groin dissection at presentation.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 5.2 years (2 months-22 years), 56 patients died (penile cancer 31, intercurrent illness 23 and unknown cause 2), giving 10 year overall and cause-specific survival (CSS) of 39 and 57%, respectively. Adverse prognostic factors for CSS on univariate analysis were G3, ulcerative/fungating or T2/3/ 4 tumors, node positive, Jackson's Stage 2/3/4, and surgical treatment for the primary. All but the last two were significant independent prognostic factors for CSS on multivariate analysis. Penile or perineal recurrence or residual disease after initial treatment was seen in 36 out of 98 evaluable patients, giving a 10-year local failure rate (LFR) of 45%. Local failure after initial treatment was successfully salvaged in the majority (26 out of 36) of patients with further surgery or radiotherapy, and local control was achieved ultimately in 74 out of 77 T1, 7 out of 12 T2; 3 out of 3 T3, and 3 out of 5 T4 tumors. In the 44 evaluable patients with T1 tumors treated by EBRT the only adverse RT parameter approaching prognostic significance (p = 0.052) was a BED value corrected for recovery of <60 Gy (alpha/beta 10, K = 0.5 Gy/day, mean = 21 days).

CONCLUSION

Invasive squamous carcinomas of the penis carry a significant risk of loco-regional recurrence after initial radiotherapy and this can be successfully salvaged in most patients with further treatment. This mandates close follow-up to detect loco regional recurrence early.

Clinical indications for brachytherapy

Brachytherapy, or placing radioactive sources either temporarily or permanently into or near a malignant tumor, is a long-established cancer treatment method. During the past 25 years, brachytherapy has become safer and more versatile than earlier radium therapy, and its indications have increased dramatically during this period. One estimate is that at least 5-10% of all patients needing radiation therapy require brachytherapy. The site-specific clinical indications and methods for brachytherapy implementation are described.