Acute toxicity during external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: comparison of different techniques

Advances in nanoparticle-based radiotherapy for cancer treatment

Radiotherapy has long been recognized as an effective conventional approach in both clinical and scientific research, primarily through mechanisms involving DNA destruction or the generation of reactive oxygen species to target tumors. However, significant challenges persist, including the unavoidable damage to normal tissues and the development of radiation resistance. As a result, nanotechnology-based radiotherapy has garnered considerable attention for its potential to enhance precision in irradiation, improve radiosensitization, and achieve therapeutic advancements. Importantly, radiotherapy alone frequently falls short of fully eradicating tumors. Consequently, to augment the efficacy of radiotherapy, it is often integrated with other therapeutic strategies. This review elucidates the mechanisms of radiotherapy sensitization based on diverse nanoparticles. Typically, radiotherapy is sensitized through augmenting reactive oxygen species production, targeted radiotherapy, hypoxia relief, enhancement of antitumor immune microenvironment, and G2/M cell cycle arrest. Moreover, the incorporation of nanoparticle-based anti-tumor strategies with radiotherapy markedly enhances the current state of radiotherapy. Additionally, a compilation of clinical trials utilizing nano-radioenhancers is presented. Finally, future prospects for clinical translation in this field are thoroughly examined.

Proton therapy toxicity outcomes for localized prostate cancer: Long-term results at a comprehensive cancer center

Background

Proton therapy (PT) has unique biologic properties with excellent clinical outcomes for the management of localized prostate cancer. Here, we aim to characterize the toxicity of PT for patients with localized prostate cancer and propose mitigation strategies using a large institutional database.

Methods

We reviewed medical records of 2772 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive PT between May 2006 through January 2020. Disease risk was stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as low [LR, n = 640]; favorable-intermediate [F-IR, n = 849]; unfavorable-intermediate [U-IR, n = 851]; high [HR, n = 315]; or very high [VHR, n = 117]. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimates assessed toxicity and freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR).

Results

Median follow-up was 7.0 years. The median dose was 78 Gy(RBE)(range: 72-79.2 Gy) in 2.0 Gy(RBE) fractions; 63 % of patients received 78 Gy(RBE) in 39 fractions, and 29 % received 76 Gy(RBE) in 38 fractions. Overall rates of late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity were 0.87 % and 1.01 %, respectively. Two patients developed grade 4 late GU toxicity and seven patients with grade 4 late GI toxicity. All patients experiencing severe late grade 4 toxicities were treated to 78 Gy(RBE) in 39 fractions with 80 Gy(RBE) dose to the anterior rectal wall and/or bladder neck. The 10-year FFBR rates for patients with LR to U-IR disease were compared between those treated with 76 and 78 Gy(RBE); the rates were 94.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 92.4-96.0 %) and 93.2 % (95 % CI 91.3-95.7 %), respectively (log-rank p = 0.22).

Conclusions

Proton therapy is associated with low rates of late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity. While rare, late grade 4 toxicities occurred in nine (0.3 %) patients. De-escalation to a total dose of 76 Gy(RBE) yields excellent clinical outcomes for patients with LR to U-IR disease with the potential for significant reductions in grade ≥3 late toxicity.

Chronic genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy with intensity-modulated versus 4-field technique

PURPOSE

To compare chronic GU and GI toxicity of pelvic radiotherapy delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional 4-field technique.

METHODS

The records of consecutive prostate cancer patients receiving RT at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 120 days were reviewed; 48 of these patients received a prostate boost preceded by pelvic radiotherapy (PRT), 14 with IMRT (IM-PRT), and 34 with 4-field (4F-PRT). Dosimetric endpoints for the bladder, rectum, composite, and target for the PRT plans were compared using the 2-tailed t test. Late RTOG GU and GI toxicity were compared using the chi test. Ordered logit regression analyses were performed using all major patient, disease, and treatment factors as covariates.

RESULTS

IM-PRT demonstrated superior bladder and rectum dosimetric endpoints over 4F-PRT for the PRT portion of the treatment and for the composite treatment at the expense of higher target inhomogeneity in the PRT portion of the treatment plan. Late GU toxicity was significantly lower in the IM-PRT group (P < 0.001), whereas late GI toxicity was similar in both groups (P = 0.44). When considering a similar follow-up interval in both groups, however, the difference in GU toxicity only reached a trend (P = 0.10). The regression analyses showed that no factor, including IMRT, reached significance in predicting GU or GI toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Use of pelvic IMRT for prostate cancer patients was not associated with reduction of late GI toxicity but was associated with a small reduction of late GU toxicity. This reduction of late GU toxicity warrants further exploration in consortium studies.

Comparison of treatment volumes and techniques in prostate cancer radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for 3 target volumes (group 1, prostate + seminal vesicles + pelvic lymph nodes; group 2, prostate + seminal vesicles; group 3, prostate only) to determine the difference in dose to normal structures (rectum, bladder, and femoral heads) while controlling for target dose using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS

Ten patients with localized prostate cancer were randomly selected. 3DCRT and IMRT planning were done to deliver 75.6 Gy to the prostate, 50.4 Gy to the pelvic nodes, and 55.8 Gy to the seminal vesicles at a standard fractionation of 1.8 Gy. An additional plan delivering 75.6 Gy to the seminal vesicles using IMRT was run. DVHs were compared for 3DCRT and IMRT.

RESULTS

In all 3 groups, the percent rectum receiving > or =70 Gy, > or =60 Gy, and > or =40 Gy was significantly less for IMRT than for 3DCRT. Increasing target volumes, as necessary for pelvic nodal irradiation, overall did not result in higher rectal doses for IMRT. With 3DCRT, however, larger target volumes did increase the amount of rectum irradiated. Similar results were obtained for the femoral heads whereas results for the bladder were mixed.

CONCLUSION

When compared with 3DCRT, IMRT delivered equivalent or higher doses to the target volume with greater sparing of critical organs. Because dose-volume parameters have been shown to relate to toxicity, IMRT would appear to be the favored technique for prostate cancer radiation, particularly with regard to nodal treatment.

Intensity-modulated versus conventional pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Analysis of acute toxicity

OBJECTIVES

To provide a single-institution analysis of the influence of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) on acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.

METHODS

The records of 610 consecutive patients with prostate cancer receiving RT were reviewed. Of these 610 patients, 49 had received a prostate boost preceded by pelvic RT (PRT), 15 intensity-modulated PRT (IM-PRT), and 34 four-field PRT (4F-PRT). The dosimetric endpoints for the bladder, rectum, and target for the PRT plans were compared using the paired t test; similar dosimetric analyses were done for the composite plans. Acute GU and GI toxicity were compared using the chi-square test. Ordered logit regression analyses were performed using all major treatment factors as covariates.

RESULTS

The bladder and rectum dosimetric endpoints were improved for IM-PRT compared with 4F-PRT for the PRT portion of the treatment plan (P = 0.06 and P = 0.03, respectively) and for the composite treatment plan (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively), at the expense of greater target inhomogeneity in the PRT portion of the treatment plan (P < 0.01). GU toxicity was significantly lower in the IM-PRT group (P < 0.001), and GI toxicity was similar in both groups (P = 0.637). The regression analyses showed that intensity-modulated RT for the pelvic portion of treatment was the only factor significantly predicting for GU toxicity (P = 0.05); no major treatment factor reached significance in predicting GI toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 4F-PRT, the use of IM-PRT improved dosimetric outcomes, was not associated with a reduction in acute GI toxicity, and was associated with a reduction in acute GU toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Systematic review of the effect of radiation dose on tumor control and morbidity in the treatment of prostate cancer by 3D-CRT

PURPOSE

A higher radiation dose is believed to result in a larger probability of tumor control and a higher risk of side effects. To make an evidence-based choice of dose, the relation between dose and outcome needs to be known. This study focuses on the dose-response relation for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review was carried out on the literature from 1990 to 2003. From the selected studies, the radiation dose, the associated 5-year survival, 5-year bNED (biochemical no evidence of disease), acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity Grade 2 or more, and sexual dysfunction were extracted. With logistic regression models, the relation between dose and outcome was described.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies met our criteria, describing 87 subgroups and involving up to 3000 patients per outcome measure. Between the (equivalent) dose of 70 and 80 Gy, various models estimated an increase in 5-year survival (ranging from 10% to 11%), 5-year bNED for low-risk patients (5-7%), late GI complications (12-16%), late GU complications (8-10%), and erectile dysfunction (19-24%). Only for the overall 5-year bNED, results were inconclusive (range, 0-18%).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest a relationship between dose and outcome measures, including survival. However, the strength of these conclusions is limited by the sometimes small number of studies, the incompleteness of the data, and above all, the correlational nature of the data. Unambiguous proof for the dose-response relationships can, therefore, only be obtained by conducting randomized trials.

High dose brachytherapy (real time) in patients with intermediate-or high-risk prostate cancer: technical description and preliminary experience

INTRODUCTION

It has been well documented that the outcome of prostate cancer treatment depends on the dose administered. Hence, techniques have been developed that allow high-dose administration without increasing the complications, e.g. external radiotherapy combined with high-dose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy. In this article we analyse the technique and protocol of real-time HDR brachytherapy together with the preliminary results that support its use. Materials and methods. Between June 1998 and December 2004, 100 patients with adenoma of the prostate were treated with 46 Gy of external irradiation to the pelvis and 2 HDR brachytherapy fractions (each of 1150 cGy) at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of a 5-week radiotherapy course. The 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) system was used to establish disease stage. Patients with intermediate-risk (PSA 10-20 ng/ml or Gleason = 7 or T2c) and high-risk (two intermediate risk factors or PSA > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 7 or > T2c) without metastases were eligible for the brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus panel statement. SPSS statistical package was used to quantify survival (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicity was scored according to RTOG guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 49-78). Clinical stage was T2a in 22% of the patients, 26% T2b and 52% T3. Initial PSA was = 10 ng/ml in 22% of the patients and > 10 ng/ml in 78%. Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 12-79). The 5-year overall survival and actuarial biochemical control were 99% and 87% respectively. No chronic severe complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The good results of local control, disease-free survival and few complications that the external radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy have shown suggest that the method should be considered as first-choice in the treatment of prostate tumours of high- and intermediate-risk.

Reducing the toxicity associated with the use of radiotherapy in men with localized prostate cancer

The risk for serious complications associated with modern radiotherapy is relatively low. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, 3DCRT and IMRT allow higher doses to be given more safely. The use of IMRT increases the time and effort required by physicians and physicists. Although there is a clear move toward IMRT, 3DCRT is considered standard. The quality assurance procedures for and fundamental questions regarding IMRT are evolving, including the radiobiologic consequences of altered time-dose fractionation and the greater dose heterogeneity in the target. Defining an accurate target volume and routinely correcting for set-up error and organ movement before each treatment promise to reduce the complications associated with EBRT in the next 5 years. Complications following prostate brachytherapy are better understood now than 10 years ago. Dosimetric or patient selection factors that correlate with a higher risk for complications, such as acute retention, strictures, severe prolonged urinary symptoms, fistulas, proctitis, and impotence, often can be accounted for or avoided. Finally, the role of radiation protectors is beginning to be addressed. It is hoped that these advances will eliminate toxicity associated with radiotherapy and increase cure rates.

Acute morbidity related to treatment volume during 3D-conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the relation between acute toxicity and irradiated volume in the organs at risk during three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January to December 2001, we treated 132 prostate cancer patients to a prescribed target dose of 70 Gy. Twenty-six patients (20%) received irradiation to the prostate only (Group P), 86 patients (65%) had field arrangements encompassing the prostate and seminal vesicles (Group PSV) while 20 (15%) received modified pelvic fields (Group MPF). A four-field conformal box technique was used. Acute toxicity according to the RTOG scoring system was prospectively recorded throughout the course of treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, radiation was well tolerated with 11%, 16% and 35% Grade 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity and 19%, 34% and 35% Grade 2 or higher genito-urinary (GU) toxicity in Groups P, PSV and MPF, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses treatment group was a significant predictor for Grade 2 or higher acute morbidity. In multivariate logistic regression, the rectum dose-volume histogram parameters were correlated to the incidence of acute Grade 2 GI toxicity, with the fractional volumes receiving more than 37-40 Gy and above 70 Gy showing the statistically strongest correlation. The fractional bladder volume receiving more than 14-27 Gy showed the statistically strongest correlation with acute GU toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-CRT radiation therapy to 70 Gy for prostate cancer was well tolerated. Only two of the 132 patients in the cohort experienced acute bladder toxicity Grade 3, none had Grade 3 rectal toxicity. Uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that the volume treated was a significant factor for the incidence of Grade 2 or higher acute morbidity.

External beam radiotherapy in elderly patients with clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma: age is not a problem

The files of 183 elderly patients aged >70 years, with localized prostate cancer (T1-3, N0-X, M0), treated with radical external radiation therapy (ERT) from January 1992 to December 2001 at the Radiotherapy Department of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, were reviewed. Median age was 75 years. ERT represented the sole treatment for 73 patients (39.9%); in 110 cases (60.1%) hormonal therapy (HT) was associated with neoadjuvant intent. Five-year overall, disease-specific and biochemical NED (bNED) survival rates were 90.2, 93.7 and 63.2%, respectively. A subset of 23 patients aged 80 years and over were analyzed and compared to 160 men aged 70-79 years. Acute toxicity and late complications were analyzed in the two groups of patients according to the RTOG scoring system. Only 10 patients (5.4%) showed grades 2-3 (G2-3) late sequelae. The results obtained in this single-institute series highlight the pivotal role of ERT in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer in the elderly.

Phase III study of ibuprofen versus placebo for radiation-induced genitourinary side effects

PURPOSE

On the basis of our anecdotal clinical observations that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents relieved dysuria during radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer, we conducted a Phase III randomized trial of ibuprofen vs. placebo for patients who had an increase in acute urinary symptoms. Our in vitro and in vivo laboratory data with a higher concentration of ibuprofen than achievable in this study demonstrated radiosensitization. This study examined whether the inflammatory response within the prostate during radiotherapy would respond to the standard dose of ibuprofen as assessed by a symptom score.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were registered to the study and were followed weekly with a formal symptom assessment. A double-blind randomization to ibuprofen, 400 mg q.i.d., vs. placebo for 7 days was done at a time when the severity score increased. The symptom response was evaluated at the end of the week.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 1998, 100 patients were entered, 28 did not have a sufficient change in symptom score to be randomized, and 19 were either unable to take ibuprofen or withdrew before randomization. Of the 53 patients randomized, 27 received placebo and 26 ibuprofen. No statistically significant differences were found between the placebo and ibuprofen groups between baseline and randomization or between randomization and the 1-week posttreatment assessment. Neither group had a change in symptom severity between randomization and the 1-week posttreatment evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The standard anti-inflammatory dose of ibuprofen did not relieve the acute urinary or rectal symptoms during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are potential radiation sensitizers with the mechanism of action as yet unknown. Clinical trials of the cyclooxygenase inhibitors as radiation sensitizers should explore a range of doses and evaluate potential mechanisms of action, including cyclooxygenase inhibition and other non-cyclooxygenase mechanisms.

Three-dimensional conformal therapy versus standard radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of prostate: an update

This study updates technical principles and results of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in localized carcinoma of the prostate. Between January 1992 and December 1999, 312 patients were treated with 3D-CRT and 135 patients were treated with bilateral arcs standard radiation therapy (SRT) alone for clinical stage T1b-c or T2 histologically confirmed prostate cancer. None of these patients received hormonal therapy. Mean follow-up for patients in the 3D-CRT group was 3.2 years (range, 2-5.9 years) and for SRT patients, 4.7 years (range, 4-7 years). For 3D-CRT, 7 intersecting fields were used (cerrobend blocking or multileaf collimation) to deliver 68-74 Gy to the prostate. Standard radiation therapy consisted of bilateral 120 degree rotational arcs, with portals using 2-cm margins around the prostate to deliver 68-70 Gy to the prostate. The criterion for chemical disease-free survival was a postirradiation prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value following the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines. Symptoms during treatment were quantitated weekly, and late effects were assessed every 4-6 months. Dose-volume histograms showed a two-thirds reduction with 3D-CRT in normal bladder or rectum receiving > or = 70 Gy with 3D-CRT. Higher 5-year chemical disease-free survival was observed with 3D-CRT (75%; for T1b-c and 79%; for T2 tumors) compared with SRT (61% and 65%, P = 0.01 and P = 0.12, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in chemical disease-free survival in patients with Gleason score of < or = 4 (P = 0.85), but, with Gleason score of 5-7, the 5-year survival rates were 83% with 3D-CRT and 59% with SRT (P < or = 0.01). In 245 patients with pretreatment PSA of < or = 10 ng/mL treated with 3D-CRT, the chemical disease-free rate was 80% versus 72% in 98 patients treated with SRT (P = 0.21). In patients with PSA of 10.1-20 ng/mL, the chemical disease-free survival rate for 50 patients treated with 3D-CRT was 71% compared with 43% for 20 patients treated with SRT (P = 0.02). The corresponding values were 59% and 16%, respectively, for patients with PSA levels > 20 ng/mL (P = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for chemical failure were pretreatment PSA (P = 0.004), nadir PSA (P = 0.001), and 3D-CRT technique (P = 0.012). Moderate dysuria was reported by 2%-5% of patients treated with 3D-CRT in contrast to 6%-9% of patients treated with SRT. The incidence of moderate loose stools or diarrhea, usually after the fourth week of treatment, was 3%-5% in the 3D-CRT patients and 8%-19% in the SRT group. Late intestinal grade 2 morbidity (proctitis or rectal bleeding) was 1% in the 3D-CRT group in contrast to 7% in SRT patients. The 3D-CRT spares more normal tissues, yields higher chemical disease-free survival, and results in less treatment morbidity than SRT in treatment of stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Follow-up at > or = 10 years is needed to confirm these observations.

Acute toxicity of conventional radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer in EORTC trial 22863

OBJECTIVES

We analysed the acute toxicity observed in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomised trial 22863 comparing conventional external irradiation with or without an agonist analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Four hundred five patients that received a dose of at least 30 Gy were considered evaluable for acute toxicity assessment. Toxicity was grouped in a few categories: general, genito-urinary, and lower gastro-intestinal. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the World Health Organisation (WHO) toxicity score and grouping together toxicity scores in different bimodal and trimodal groups.

RESULTS

Overall, our data show that age, previous surgery and irradiation dose are important predictive factors for acute toxicity, but not the use of combined hormone therapy. Fifteen percent of patients suffered of moderate to severe acute toxicity (WHO G3-G4). Life threatening toxicity was observed in six cases (1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of toxicity combining in different groups the original five scores scale produced conflicting results similar to those commonly reported in literature. Interpretation of the role of pre-treatment factors with uneven distribution in the study requires careful evaluation. These data obtained with conventional curative irradiation of high-risk prostate cancer patients are proposed for comparison with results achieved using modern state-of-the-art irradiation techniques.

Relationships between DVHs and late rectal bleeding after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of a large group of patients pooled from three institutions

BACKGROUND

Accurate modeling of late rectal reactions needs the collection of individual 3D dose-volume data (i.e. DVH) as well as clinical information of large cohorts of patients. The possibility of collecting a large number of patients with many different dose-volume combinations is very suitable for this purpose.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to search for significant correlation between dose-volume histograms/dose statistics of the rectum and late rectum bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from three institutions for 402 patients previously treated for prostate cancer with three to four field techniques, were retrospectively pooled and were collected with a number of clinical and physical parameters, including DVHs of the rectum (including filling). Patients with large air/fecal content in the rectum during planning computerized tomography (CT) scan were excluded from the analysis (n = 74). Out of 328 patients, 229 patients received an ICRU dose between 70 and 76Gy and the current analysis is referred to this subgroup of patients (median follow up: 30 months, range: 12-85 months). Out of these 229 patients, 189 patients were treated with conformal techniques. Rectum was contoured from the anal verge up to the sigmoid flessure by one observer for each institution. Dosimetric and contouring consistencies between the three institutions were previously investigated and the impact on DVHs was found to be quite modest for the purposes of the study. Median/quartile values of all parameters were considered as cut-off values for statistical analysis. We considered as bleeders those patients who experienced grades II-III late bleeding (modified RTOG scoring scale).

RESULTS

Twenty two of 229 patients experienced > or =grade II late bleeding (30 months actuarial incidence: 10.7%). Significant correlation between a number of parameters and late bleeding was found (log-rank test). With regard to DVH, all median and third quartile values for V50-V70 were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of rectal bleeding, if excepting the median value of V70. Based on the results of univariate analysis, the patients were divided into two groups: 'high risk', with at least one value above quartiles in the range V50-V60 (V50: 70%, V55: 64%, V60: 55%); 'low risk', the remaining patients. The 30 months actuarial rates of bleeding were 19.2 and 5.9% for the 'high' and the 'low' risk group, respectively (P = 0.0003 log-rank test). A multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) including 'DVH grouping' and the main remaining variables (age, previous prostatectomy, diabetes, hypertension, adjuvant hormonal therapy, rectum volume and ICRU dose) showed that 'DVH grouping' is the most predictive parameter (P = 0.005) together with adjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.025) and ICRU dose (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the role of the rectal DVH in separating groups of patients having prostate radiotherapy in low and high risk of developing late bleeding. Based on these results, V50 below 60-65% and V60 below 50-55% seem to be the robust cut-off values to keep the risk of developing late rectal bleeding reasonably low. However, due to the 'heterogeneity' of the considered population, the results found should be applied with caution in 'more homogeneous' groups of patients. The association of adjuvant hormone deprivation seems to be associated with an increased risk of rectal toxicity; the mechanism for this effect should be a focus of further research.

Dislocation of small bowel volume within box pelvic treatment fields, using new "up down table" device

PURPOSE

To present the impact of a novel minimization device, the up down table (UDT), on the volume of small bowel included within a 4-field pelvic irradiation plan.

METHODS

A polystyrene bowel displacement standard mold was created and added to a customized vacuum cushion (Vac Lok) formed around the abdomen and legs of each patient in the prone position. Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients with pelvic malignancies treated with the UDT device were compared with 1 historic series (68 cases) treated at our division. Small bowel contrast dyes at the time of simulation were used in all patients.

RESULTS

The average volume of small bowel within the planning target volume (high-dose volume, calculated with Gallagher method) was 100 cm(3) (median 49 +/- 114) in the series treated with standard box technique and 23 cm(3) (median 0 +/- 64) in the series treated with the UDT (p < 0.001). The average volume of small bowel included in any isodose (any-dose volume) was 505 cm(3) (median 447 +/- 338) and 158 cm(3) (median 69 +/- 207), respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of G1, G2, and G3 acute enteric toxicity (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria) in the UDT series was 16%, 15%, and 1.5%; in the standard box technique, it was 28%, 25%, and 3%, respectively (p < 0.05). The incidence of acute enteric toxicity directly correlated with the irradiated small bowel volume. In the UDT series, the 5-year actuarial incidence of G3 chronic enteric toxicity was 1.8%. The setup procedures, analyzed in 18 cases, revealed no systematic errors and a standard deviation equal to +/-5 mm for random errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The UDT technique is comfortable, inexpensive, highly reproducible, and permits an almost full bowel displacement from standard radiotherapy fields.

Prostate volumes and organ movement defined by serial computerized tomographic scans during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

The aim of this study was to assess changes in prostate volumes and organ movement during a course of external beam irradiation using serial computerized tomographic (CT) scans and three-dimensional treatment planning software. Ten consenting prostate cancer patients underwent repeat CT scans at biweekly intervals during the course of external beam irradiation. The spacing of 5 mm was used because this spacing mimics our clinical treatment approach. Prostate locations were determined by merging CT images using bony anatomy and comparing the differences in the prostate volumes, the edges (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, and lateral) and centers of the prostate (EoP and CoP, respectively). Compared to the 10 initial treatment planning CT scans, the prostate volume determined by the repeat CT scans tended to be smaller (approximately 14%, P < 0.001). The prostate volumes determined by repeat CT scans tended to be stable with a mean volume of 86% (S.D. = 18%) of the initial CT. When assessed by changes in the EoP, superior movements appeared to be the most common source for concern for adequate coverage of the prostate, while inferior movement was not seen. When assessed by changes in CoP, movement of > or = 3 mm was noted in 47% of the studies in the superior direction, with the average displacement being approximately 2.0 mm. In this study, the prostate volume tended to be smaller 2 weeks after the start of radiotherapy. Moreover, the prostate volumes defined by the serial CT scans were less reproducible than expected. Superior displacement of the prostate is the most common and significant type of displacement, while inferior movement is least frequent when patients are simulated with their rectums empty. Because of the magnitude of daily setup errors, organ movement, and problems with reproducibility in target definition, additional field edge reductions do not appear to be warranted during the delivery of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Efforts should be directed at improving our ability to reduce organ movement and accurately targeting the prostate.

Micronuclei in lymphocytes of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy

To further verify the applicability of the micronucleus (MN) assay in biodosimetry, we measured the MN yield in cytokinesis-blocked (CB) peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of eight prostate cancer (PC) patients. These patients had no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy (xRT). They were treated with standardized schemes of fractionated pelvic xRT. Before xRT, and at one random time-point during the course of xRT, blood samples were collected from each patient for the following purposes: (1) to verify the relationship between the MN yield in PBL and the estimated equivalent (EQ) total-body absorbed dose; and (2) to evaluate the individual differences of ex vivo radiation dose-response (1-4 Gy) relationship of MN yield in PBL before xRT. The number of xRT fractions, cumulative tumor dose, and EQ total-body absorbed doses of these patients represented a wide range. We found in PBL of these patients that (1) MN yield (Y) increased linearly with the estimated EQ total-body absorbed dose as Y=14.6+9.2D (R(2)=0.7, p=0.007); the distributions of MN yield were overdispersed; the ratio of relative increment of MN yield per 1000 binucleated (BN) PBL ranged from 0.9 to 8.2 (median: 4.1) folds above that of the respective baseline levels; and (2) before xRT, the MN yields also increased linearly with the ex vivo radiation dose; at each radiation dose level, the distributions of MN yield were overdispersed in most patients. In two of the three patients with xRT-induced early side effects (cystitis, diarrhea), the MN yield in PBL induced by ex vivo irradiation before xRT was significantly higher than in the other patients without xRT-induced side effects. These findings suggest that MN yields in CB PBL can be used as an in vivo biodosimeter. Since the differences in individual ex vivo radiation dose-response relationship of MN yield in PBL before xRT appeared to be significant, our preliminary results also suggest that it may be possible to identify individual intrinsic radiosensitivity before the start of xRT.

Three-dimensional conformal therapy or standard irradiation in localized carcinoma of prostate: preliminary results of a nonrandomized comparison

PURPOSE

We present preliminary results of a nonrandomized comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) and standard radiation therapy (SRT) in localized carcinoma of the prostate in two groups of patients with comparable prognostic factors treated during the same period.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1992 and December 1997, 146 patients were treated with 3D CRT and 131 with SRT alone for clinical stage T1c or T2 histologically confirmed carcinoma of the prostate. None of these patients received hormonal therapy. Mean follow-up for all patients is 3 years (range, 1-6 years). For 3D CRT, 7 intersecting fields were used (Cerrobend blocking or multileaf collimation) to deliver 68-73.8 Gy to the prostate; 3D dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the planning target volume, bladder, and rectum were obtained. SRT consisted of bilateral 120 degrees rotational arcs, with portals with 2-cm margins around the prostate to deliver 68-70 Gy to the prostate. The criterion for chemical disease-free survival was a postirradiation prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (Tandem-R, Hybritech) value following the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines. Symptoms during treatment were quantitated weekly, and late effects were assessed every 4-6 months.

RESULTS

DVHs showed a two-thirds reduction in normal bladder or rectum receiving 70 Gy or more with 3D CRT. Higher 5-year chemical disease-free survival was observed with 3D CRT (91% for T1c and 96% for T2 tumors) compared with SRT (53% and 58%, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in chemical disease-free survival in patients with Gleason score of 4 or less (p = 0.83), but with Gleason score of 5-7, the 5-year survival rates were 96% with 3D CRT and 53% with SRT (p < or = 0.01). In 111 patients with pretreatment PSA of 10 ng/mL or less, treated with 3D CRT, the chemical disease-free rate was 96% vs. 65% in 94 patients treated with SRT (p < or = 0.01). In patients with PSA of 10. 1-20 ng/mL, the chemical disease-free survival rate for 26 patients treated with 3D CRT was 88% compared with 40% for 20 patients treated with SRT (p = 0.05). The corresponding values were 71% and 26%, respectively, for patients with PSA levels of greater than 20 ng/mL (p = 0.30). On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for chemical failure were pretreatment PSA (p = 0. 023), nadir PSA (p = 0.001), and 3D CRT technique (p = 0.033). Moderate dysuria and difficulty in urinating were reported by 2-5% of patients treated with 3D CRT in contrast to 6-9% of patients treated with SRT; moderate urinary frequency and nocturia were reported by 18-24% treated with 3D CRT and 18-27% of patients in the SRT group. The incidence of moderate loose stools/diarrhea, usually after the 4th week of treatment, was 3-5% in the 3D CRT patients and 8-19% in the SRT group. Late intestinal morbidity (proctitis, rectal bleeding) was very low (1.7%) in the 3D CRT group in contrast to the SRT patients (8%).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional CRT spares more normal tissues, yields higher chemical disease-free survival, and results in less treatment morbidity than SRT in treatment of Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

Prostate position late in the course of external beam therapy: patterns and predictors

PURPOSE

To examine prostate and seminal vesicles position late in the course of radiation therapy and to determine the effect and predictive value of the bladder and rectum on prostate and seminal vesicles positioning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-four patients with localized prostate cancer underwent a computerized tomography scan (CT1) before the start of radiation therapy. After 4-5 weeks of radiation therapy, a second CT scan (CT2) was obtained. All patients were scanned in the supine treatment position with instructions to maintain a full bladder. The prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum were contoured. CT2 was aligned via fixed bony anatomy to CT1. The geometrical center and volume of each structure were obtained and directly compared.

RESULTS

The prostate shifted along a diagonal axis extending from an anterior-superior position to a posterior-inferior position. The dominant shift was to a more posterior-inferior position. On average, bladder and rectal volumes decreased to 51% (+/-29%) and 82% (+/-45%) of their pretreatment values, respectively. Multiple regression analysis (MRA) revealed that bladder movement and volume change and upper rectum movement were independently associated with prostate motion (p = 0.016, p = 0. 003, and p = 0.052 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients are often instructed to maintain a full bladder during a course of external beam radiation therapy, in the hopes of decreasing bladder and small bowel toxicity. However, our study shows that large bladder volumes late in therapy are strongly associated with posterior prostate displacement. This prostate displacement may result in marginal miss.

Acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 1991 and June 1998, 198 prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D-CRT at the University of California Davis Medical Center. Fifty-two of these patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level </= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score </= 6, and a 1997 AJCC clinical stage T1bN0-T2bN0. Eleven (21%) patients received radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles; the remaining patients were treated to the prostate only. The 3D-CRT treatment planning guidelines in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406 were followed after 1994 (similar treatment planning was used before the protocol became available). Typically, 4 oblique and 2 lateral fields were treated. All patients were seen at least weekly while under treatment, 1 month postirradiation and then every 3 months. Total radiation doses ranged from 66.0-79.2 Gy, with a median dose of 73.8 Gy in 41 fractions over 8 weeks. Acute toxicity is described according to the RTOG acute toxicity scoring system.

RESULTS

Overall, 3D-CRT was well-tolerated: 29% of patients experienced RTOG Grade 1 and 27% experienced Grade 2 acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Forty percent and 33% of patients experienced Grade 1 and 2 acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, respectively. As expected, more acute morbidity, especially GI, was observed with a larger clinical target volume (prostate and seminal vesicles versus prostate only; p = 0. 05). Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy did not increase the incidence or severity of radiation-induced side effects. No acute toxicity >/= Grade 3, e.g., hourly nocturia, gross hematuria, diarrhea requiring parenteral support, narcotics for pain control, or catheterization for acute urinary retention, was observed.

CONCLUSION

Although relatively high doses of radiation are delivered to prostate cancers with 3D-CRT compared with conventional radiotherapy, 3D-CRT is surprisingly well-tolerated. No patients in the cohort eligible for implant monotherapy experienced acute toxicity >/= Grade 3.

Conformal irradiation of concave-shaped PTVs in the treatment of prostate cancer by simple 1D intensity-modulated beams

BACKGROUND

In the case of concave-shaped PTVs including prostate (P) and seminal vesicles (SV), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) should improve the therapeutic ratio of the treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE

Comparing IMRT by simple 1D modulations with conventional 3D conformal therapy (i.e. non-IMRT) in the treatment of concave-shaped PTVs including P+SV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For five patients having a concave-shaped PTV (P+SV) previously treated at our Institute with conformal radiotherapy, conventional 3- and 4-fields conformal plans were compared with IMRT plans in terms of biological indices. IMRT plans were generated by using five equi-spaced beams with a partial shielding of the rectum obtainable with our single-absorber modulation technique (Fiorino C, Lev A, Fusca M, Cattaneo GM, Rudello F, Calandrino R. Dynamic beam modulation by using a single dynamic absorber. Phys. Med. Biol. 1995;40:221-240). The modulation was one-dimensional and the shape of the beams was at single minimum in correspondence with the 'core' of the rectum; the beam intensity in the minimum was set equal to 20 or 40% of the open beam intensity. All plans were simulated on the CADPLAN TPS using a pencil-beam based algorithm (with 18 MV X-rays). Tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) (for rectum, bladder and femoral head) were calculated for all situations when varying the isocentre dose from 60 to 90 Gy. Dose distributions were corrected taking dose fractionation into account through the linear-quadratic model; for the TCP/NTCP estimations the Webb-Nahum and the Lyman-Kutcher models were respectively applied. Three different scores were considered: (a) increase of TCP while keeping rectum NTCP equal to 5% (TCP(5%)); (b) increase of the uncomplicated tumour control probability (P+); (c) increase of the biological-based scoring function (S+), developed by Mohan et al. (Mohan R, Mageras GS, Baldwin B, Clinically relevant optimization of 3D conformal treatments. Med. Phys. 1992;19:933-944). The impact of the uncertainty in the knowledge of the parameters of the biological models was investigated for TCP(5%).

RESULTS

(a) The average gain in TCP(5%) when considering IMRT against non-IMRT conformal plans was 7.3% (range 5.0-13.5%); (b) the average increase of P+ was 3.4% (range: 1. 0-8.5%); and (c) the average increase of S+ was 5.4% (range 2.9-12. 4%). The largest gain was found for one patient (patient 5) showing a significantly larger overlapping between PTV and rectum.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple 1D-IMRT may clearly improve the therapeutic ratio in the treatment of concave-shaped PTVs including P and SV. In the range of clinically suitable values, the impact of the uncertainty of the parameters n and sigma(alpha) does not significantly alter the main results concerning the gain in TCP(5%). The reported gain in terms of P+ and S+ should be considered with great caution because of the intrinsic uncertainties of the model's parameters and, for bladder, because the 'true' DVH (considering variations of the shape and dimension due to variable filling) may be very different from the DVH calculated on a single CT scan. Further investigations should consider inversely-optimised 1D and 2D-IMRT plan in order to compare them in terms of cost-benefit.

Imaging and radiotherapy of the prostate

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in men. Over the past 10 to 20 years, advances in screening and diagnostic and management paradigms have led to improved treatment outcomes. This article offers an overview of the evolution of the role and nature of diagnostic imaging techniques in the management of prostate cancer.

Efficacy of selective alpha-1 blocker therapy in the treatment of acute urinary symptoms during radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of an alpha-1 adrenoreceptor blocking agent for acute urinary symptoms in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1987 and 1995, 743 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT. A total of 275 (37%) patients developed Grade 2 acute urinary symptoms as defined by the RTOG morbidity scoring system. Terazosin hydrochloride (THC), a selective alpha-1 adrenoceptor blocking agent, was given to 119 (43%) patients for treatment of their urinary symptoms, whereas nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAID) were administered to 71 patients (26%). Thirty-one patients (11%) were treated with other medications, and 54 (20%) did not seek pharmacologic intervention for their urinary symptoms. Patients were monitored weekly to assess changes in urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia.

RESULTS

Treatment with THC resulted in a significant resolution of urinary symptoms in 79 of 119 patients (66%), while 26 (22%) had moderate improvement, and 14 (12%) had minimal to no response to this drug. In contrast, only 11 of 71 (16%) of the patients treated with NSAIDs experienced significant symptom relief, 20 (28%) had moderate improvement, and 40 (56%) had minimal to no response. The difference in the significant symptomatic improvement between THC and NSAID therapy (66% vs. 16%) was highly significant (p < 0.001). For patients treated with THC, a higher likelihood of significant symptom relief was observed in patients who did not receive neoadjuvant androgen ablation (p = 0.04) and in those who were younger than 65 years of age (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Alpha-1 selective adrenoceptor blocking agents are effective in ameliorating the acute urinary symptoms in patients receiving radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Although this was not a randomized prospective study, the data suggest that NSAIDs were less effective in relieving radiation-induced urinary symptoms.

In the radiotherapy of prostate cancer, technique determines the doses to the penile structures

For 11 consecutive prostate cancer patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in our institution, penile structures (PNS) were outlined in CT images obtained for treatment planning purposes. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were compared in order to study dose-volume relations for three techniques: 4FLD, an axial coplanar, four-field box technique; 6FLD, a six-field coplanar technique; and 4NAX, a coplanar but non-axial, four-field technique. All three techniques delivered equal doses to the planning target volumes (PTV). Our statistical analyses strongly indicate that the three techniques can be ranked as 6FLD better than 4FLD (and 4FLD better than 4NAX) as far as irradiating PNS volume during treatment of prostate cancer (PC) is concerned. For each technique, there is a "spread" owing to differences in patient anatomy and/or target size, position, and extent, but each technique has a similar "profile" or "shape" distinct from other techniques. Whether irradiating smaller volumes of PNS will influence the sexual potency outcome remains to be demonstrated. However, PNS should be considered as another critical structure in addition to rectum, bladder and femoral heads in the radiotherapy (RT) of PC, especially in 3DCRT dose escalation studies. Sexual potency outcomes can be correlated to dose-volume relations in the future and this will help refine radiotherapy techniques further.

Acute morbidity reduction using 3DCRT for prostate carcinoma: a randomized study

PURPOSE

To study the effects on gastrointestinal and urological acute morbidity, a randomized toxicity study, comparing conventional and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for prostate carcinoma was performed. To reveal possible volume effects, related to the observed toxicity, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were used.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From June 1994 to March 1996, 266 patients with prostate carcinoma, stage T1-4N0M0 were enrolled in the study. All patients were treated to a dose of 66 Gy (ICRU), using the same planning procedure, treatment technique, linear accelerator, and portal imaging procedure. However, patients in the conventional treatment arm were treated with rectangular, open fields, whereas conformal radiotherapy was performed with conformally shaped fields using a multileaf collimator. All treatment plans were made with a 3D planning system. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined to be the gross target volume (GTV) + 15 mm. Acute toxicity was evaluated using the EORTC/RTOG morbidity scoring system.

RESULTS

Patient and tumor characteristics were equally distributed between both study groups. The maximum toxicity was 57% grade 1 and 26% grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity; 47% grade 1, 17% grade 2, and 2% grade > 2 urological toxicity. Comparing both study arms, a reduction in gastrointestinal toxicity was observed (32% and 19% grade 2 toxicity for conformal and conventional radiotherapy, respectively; p = 0.02). Further analysis revealed a marked reduction in medication for anal symptoms: this accounts for a large part of the statistical difference in gastrointestinal toxicity (18% vs. 14% [p = ns] grade 2 rectum/sigmoid toxicity and 16% vs. 8% [p < 0.0001] grade 2 anal toxicity for conventional and conformal radiotherapy, respectively). A strong correlation between exposure of the anus and anal toxicity was found, which explained the difference in anal toxicity between both study arms. No difference in urological toxicity between both treatment arms was found, despite a relatively large difference in bladder DVHs.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in gastrointestinal morbidity was mainly accounted for by reduced toxicity for anal symptoms using 3DCRT. The study did not show a statistically significant reduction in acute rectum/sigmoid and bladder toxicity.

[A comparison of CT-supported 3D planning with simulator planning in the pelvic irradiation of primary cervical carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Using standardized simulator planning guided by bony landmarks for pelvic irradiation of primary cervical carcinoma with some patients a geographical miss regarding tumor or potential tumor spread can happen because of insufficient knowledge of the individual anatomical situation. The question arises whether for patients with this indication the higher effort in terms of time and personnel for 3D treatment planning is justified.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

In a prospective study on 20 subsequent patients with primary cervical carcinoma in Stages I to III simulator planning of a 4-field box-technique was performed. After defining the planning target volume (PTV) in the 3D planning system the field configuration of the simulator planning was transmitted. The resulting plan was compared to a second one based on the defined PTV and evaluated regarding a possible geographical miss and encompassment of the PTV by the treated volume (ICRU). Volumes of open and shaped portals were calculated for both techniques.

RESULTS

Planning by simulation resulted in 1 geographical miss and in 10 more cases the encompassment of the PTV by the treated volume was inadequate. For a PTV of mean 1,729 cm3 the mean volume defined by simulation was 3,120 cm3 for the open portals and 2,702 cm3 for the shaped portals (Figure 1). The volume reduction by blocks was 13.4% (mean). With CT-based 3D treatment planning the volume of the open portals was 3.3% (mean) enlarged to 3,224 cm3 (Figure 2). The resulting mean volume of the shaped portals was 2,458 ccm. The reduction compared to the open portals was 23.8% (mean). The treated volumes were 244 cm3 or 9% (mean) smaller compared to simulator planning. The "treated volume/planning target volume ratio" was decreased from 1.59 to 1.42.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of 3D treatment planning for pelvic irradiation of cervical carcinoma is to be recommended for reasons of quality assurance. Reduction of the treated volume is possible but further research has to be done to determine whether the rate of complications can be decreased as well.

Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Radical radiotherapy is commonly used to treat localised prostate cancer. Late chronic side-effects limit the dose that can be given, and may be linked to the volume of normal tissues irradiated. Conformal radiotherapy allows a smaller amount of rectum and bladder to be treated, by shaping the high-dose volume to the prostate. We assessed the ability of this new technology to lessen the risk of radiation-related effects in a randomised controlled trial of conformal versus conventional radiotherapy.

METHODS

We recruited men with prostate cancer for treatment with a standard dose of 64 Gy in daily 2 Gy fractions. The men were randomly assigned conformal or conventional radiotherapy treatment. The primary endpoint was the development of late radiation complications (> 3 months after treatment) measured with the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) score. Indicators of disease (cancer) control were also recorded.

FINDINGS

In the 225 men treated, significantly fewer men developed radiation-induced proctitis and bleeding in the conformal group than in the conventional group (37 vs 56% > or = RTOG grade 1, p=0.004; 5 vs 15% > or = RTOG grade 2, p=0.01). There were no differences between groups in bladder function after treatment (53 vs 59% > or = grade 1, p=0.34; 20 vs 23% > or = grade 2, p=0.61). After median follow-up of 3.6 years there was no significant difference between groups in local tumour control (conformal 78% [95% CI 66-86], conventional 83% [69-90]).

INTERPRETATION

Conformal techniques significantly lowered the risk of late radiation-induced proctitis after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Widespread introduction of these radiotherapy treatment methods is appropriate. Our results are the basis for dose-escalation studies to improve local tumour control.

[Comparison of different 3-dimensional irradiation techniques in local radiotherapy of prostatic carcinoma]

PURPOSE

Four different three-dimensional planning techniques for localized radiotherapy of prostate cancer were compared with regard to dose homogeneity within the target volume and dose to organs at risk, dependent upon tumor stage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six patients with stage T1, 7 patients with stage T2 and 4 patients with stage T3 were included in this study. Four different 3D treatment plans (rotation, 4-field, 5-field and 6-field technique) were calculated for each patient. Dose was calculated with the reference point at the isocenter (100%). The planning target volume was encompassed within the 95% isodose surface. All the techniques used different shaped portal for each beam. Dose volume histograms were created and compared for the planning target volume and the organs at risk (33%, 50%, 66% volume level) in all techniques.

RESULTS

The 4 different three-dimensional planning techniques revealed no differences concerning dose homogeneity within the planning target volume. The dose volume distribution at organs at risk show differences between the calculated techniques. In our study the best protection for bladder and rectum in stage T1 and T2 was achieved by the 6-field technique. A significant difference was achieved between 6-field and 4-field technique only in the 50% volume of the bladder (p = 0.034), between the 6-field and rotation technique (all volume levels) and between 5-field and rotation technique (all volume levels). In stage T1, T2 6-field and 4-field technique in 50% (p = 0.033) and 66% (p = 0.011) of the rectum volume. In stage T3 a significant difference was not observed between the 4 techniques. The best protection of head of the femur was achieved by the rotation technique.

CONCLUSION

In the localized radiotherapy of prostate cancer in stage T1 or T2 the best protection for bladder and rectum was achieved by a 3D-planned conformal 6-field technique. If the seminal vesicles have been included in the target volume and in the case of large planning target volume other techniques should be taken for a better protection for organs at risk e. g. a 3D-planned 4-field technique box technique.

Interphysician variability in defining the planning target volume in the irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles

With the improvements in treatment accuracy the risk exists of over-reliance on the capability of the physician to estimate the extent of the tumour. We assessed the variability between six radiotherapists in defining the planning target volume (PTV) on CT slices for three prostate tumour cases. Percentage differences between measured volumes and mean values calculated for each case ranged from -53.64 to +60.48% (SD 36.00%). There is a considerable variation in delineating the PTV, both in the cranio-caudal direction and in the in-slice extension of the areas drawn on each slice (standard deviations ranged from 0.35 to 2.64 cm2). We also checked the uncertainty in the shape and position of the contours on each CT image. The analysis was performed on three slices of one test case. As we expected, the uncertainty seems largest for seminal vesicle slices and smallest for prostatic apex slices. These results endorse the need for uncertainty analysis of all departmental processes in order to define a detailed protocol and consequently to minimize the interphysician differences in PTV delineations.

Radiation-associated morbidity in patients undergoing small-field external beam irradiation for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To quantify complication rates after small-field external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate in a uniformly treated patient population with long follow-up using a simple tool designed to identify subtle treatment-related side effects; and to identify clinical and technical variables associated with increased morbidity after irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 441 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy between 1985 and 1989 were eligible for analysis. Gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and sexual function were assessed retrospectively using a patient self-scoring, five-grade toxicity scale. Seven clinical and 15 technical variables were recorded for each patient. The association between the clinical and technical variables and rectal, bladder, and sexual side effects was examined. The 375 patients who received small-field (<12.5 x 12.5-cm) external beam irradiation via a four-field box on a 6-MV (n = 74, or 20% of patients), 8-MV (n = 140, or 37%), or 15-MV (n = 161, or 43%) linear accelerator form the basis for the study. Ninety-one percent of patients received treatment with 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions to a delivered dose of at least 66 Gy. Follow-up was complete through 62 months in living patients, with five (1%) of the entire group lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 137 of 354 evaluable patients (39%) reported rectal complications after treatment; however, 20 patients(6%) had heme-positive stools as their only symptom and 66 (19%) had mild symptoms not requiring treatment. Only 14% of the entire group required intervention. Of 356 patients, 117 (33%) evaluable for bladder complications developed genitourinary changes: In 14 patients (4%) asymptomatic hematuria occurred, 71 (20%) had mild symptoms not requiring treatment, and 32 (9%) required treatment. Of the 171 patients who were potent prior to radiation, 106 (62%) reported impotence after treatment. No statistically significant association was identified between any clinical or technical variables (including machine energy) assessed and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective review, treatment-related bowel and bladder side effects were not identified in the majority of patients despite the use of a grading system designed to identify subtle changes. Impotence, however, was common. Although pretreatment clinical characteristics varied among patients, they could not be used to predict the subsequent development of complications. The only treatment-related characteristic that varied in this study was machine energy, which did not correlate with complications.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and dose escalation: where do we stand?

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is an effective means of delivering high doses of radiation with enhanced precision. Several institutions have gained substantial experience using this modality for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Reports from these centers have demonstrated not only excellent tolerance despite the administration of higher radiation doses, but improved biochemical and local control outcomes as well. Meticulous attention to treatment technique and dose volume histogram analysis are critical for the safe implementation of these higher doses. The emergence of intensity-modulated treatment planning has provided the opportunity at our institution to further escalate the radiation dose to 86.4 Gy while still respecting the surrounding normal tissue tolerance. Phase I studies will need to continue to define more clearly the maximal dose of radiation that can be delivered safely with this modality. Current studies indicate a direct correlation between dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival response for patients with intermediate and high-risk prognostic features. These patients likely represent the ideal cohort for future studies designed to investigate the impact of dose on biochemical and disease-free survival outcome.

A phase III double-blind randomised study of rectal sucralfate suspension in the prevention of acute radiation proctitis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A limited number of studies have suggested that oral sucralfate reduces the acute and late gastro-intestinal side-effects of pelvic radiotherapy and sucralfate enemas ameliorate symptoms of chronic proctitis. Sucralfate may act via local bFGF at the mucosal level in promoting angiogenesis and reducing epithelial associated microvascular injury. This multi-institutional study was designed to test the hypothesis that sucralfate given as an enema would have a significant protective effect against acute radiation induced rectal injury by direct application to the mucosa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients having radiotherapy for localised carcinoma of the prostate were randomised in a double-blind placebo-controlled study to receive either 15 ml of placebo suspension or 3 g of sucralfate in 15 ml suspension, given as a once daily enema during and for 2 weeks following radiotherapy. Assessment was based on the EORTC/RTOG acute toxicity criteria and a patient self-assessment diary.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between placebo and sucralfate for peak incidences of EORTC/RTOG proctitis. For the placebo and sucralfate arms 95 and 88% (difference 7 +/- 11%) suffered some degree of proctitis, with 71 and 61% (difference 10 +/- 19%) reaching grade 2, respectively. The median period to onset of grade 2 proctitis was 33.5 and 36 days, with the median duration being 9.5 and 15 days, respectively, again these difference being non-significant. Thirty-five and 37% of patients rated the effect of radiotherapy on bowel habit as 'a lot' with a moderate or severe effect on normal daily living in 52 and 49%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that sucralfate given as a once daily enema does not substantially reduce the incidence of symptoms associated with acute radiation proctitis and its routine clinical use cannot be recommended. This cohort of patients will be followed to determine if any difference develops in relation to late toxicity.

Daily-diary evaluated side-effects of conformal versus conventional prostatic cancer radiotherapy technique

Conventional 4-field box radiotherapy technique induces high morbidity for patients with localized prostatic cancer. Using a patient daily diary, the present study compared side-effects after conventional radiotherapy with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Fifty-eight patients treated with the conventional technique (with or without sucralfate) were compared with 72 patients treated with conformal technique. The patient groups were compared with an age-matched control population. Patients treated with conformal technique were also evaluated regarding acute and late urinary problems. Results showed that patients treated with conformal technique reported significantly fewer side-effects as compared with conventional technique. Patients treated with sucralfate also showed slightly decreased intestinal morbidity in comparison to non-sucralfate group. Acute and late morbidity evaluated by the patients was decreased after conformal radiotherapy as compared with the conventional technique. Sucralfate may be of value if conformal radiotherapy is used for dose escalation in prostatic cancer patients.

Comparing 3-, 4- and 6-fields techniques for conformal irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles using dose-volume histograms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Comparing some isocentric coplanar techniques for conformal irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five conformal techniques have been considered: (A) a 3-fields technique with an antero-posterior (AP) field and two lateral (LAT-LAT) 30 degrees wedged fields; (B) a 3-fields technique with an AP field and two oblique posterior (OBL) 15 degrees wedged fields with relative weights of 0.8, 1 and 1, respectively; (C) a 4-fields technique (AP-PA and LAT-LAT); (D) a 6-fields technique (LAT-LAT and four OBL at gantry angles 45 degrees, 135 degrees, 235 degrees and 315 degrees) with all the fields having the same weight; (E) the same 6-fields technique with lateral fields double-weighted with respect to the oblique fields. The conformal plans have been simulated on 12 consecutive patients (stages B and C) by using our 3D treatment planning system (Cadplan 2.7). The contours of the rectum, the bladder and the left femoral head were outlined together with the clinical target volume (CTV) which included the prostate and the seminal vesicles. A margin of 10 mm was added to define the planning target volume (PTV) through automatic volume expansion. Then a 7 mm margin between the PTV and block edges was added to take the beam penumbra into account. Dose distributions were normalised to the isocentre and the reference dose was considered to be 95% of the isocentre dose. Dose-volume histograms and dose statistics of the rectum, the bladder and the left femoral head were collected for all plans. For the rectum and the bladder the mean dose (Dm) and the fraction of volume receiving a dose higher than the reference dose (V95) were compared. For the femoral head, the mean dose together with the fraction of volume receiving a dose higher than 50% (V50) were compared.

RESULTS

Differences among the techniques have been found for all three considered organs at risk. When considering the rectum, technique A is better than the others both when considering Dm and V95 (P = 0.002), while technique D is the worst when considering Dm (P < 0.002) and is also worse than techniques A, E (P = 0.002) and C (P = 0.003) when considering V95. Technique E is the best when considering the bladder mean dose (P = 0.002 against A and D, P < 0.01 against B and C) and technique C is the worst (P < 0.012). No relevant differences were found for the bladder V95. In the femoral heads, techniques A and E are worse than B, C and D (P < 0.003) when considering Dm and V50. Moreover, techniques B and D are better than C (P < 0.004) when considering V50.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no technique that is absolutely better than the others. Technique A gives the best sparing of the rectum; the bladder is better spared with technique E. These results are reached with a worse sparing of the femoral heads which should be carefully taken into account.

Four-week arc radiotherapy for B2-C prostate cancer: the need for prospective evaluation of short fractionation schemes

A retrospective review of 173 men with clinical stage B2-C prostate cancer treated by small-volume arc radiotherapy to 5200 cGy in 16 fractions over 4 weeks was undertaken. At 5 years, clinical local failure rates were 14% for stage B2 and 18% for stage C. Five-year survival rates were 81 and 61%, respectively. No discernible differences were detected between a policy of encompassing the planning target volume by the 90% or 95% isodose. The limitations of this retrospective evidence and that of the literature are discussed. In the context of resource limitations affecting radiation oncology, prospective assessment of this technique is required to determine the true outcome.

The role of retrograde urethrography in the planning of prostate cancer radiotherapy

This analysis was performed to examine the role of retrograde urethrography in the planning of prostate cancer irradiation. Retrograde urethrograms were performed in 91 patients at the time of simulation. The abrupt narrowing of the contrast column in the urethra was visualized in each case. The distance between the abrupt narrowing of the contrast column and a line connecting the lower poles of the ischial tuberosities was measured in each patient. This distance ranged from 2 to 33 mm with a mean and median of 14 mm. A review of the literature revealed that the abrupt narrowing of the contrast column lies between 5-13 mm inferior to the prostate apex as determined by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography. The prostate apex will be adequately covered by placing the inferior edge of the treatment field 15 mm below the abrupt narrowing of the contrast column. This technique will result in at least 20 mm between the prostate apex and the inferior field edge. Performing a retrograde urethrogram at the time of simulation can help prevent geographic misses of the prostate gland when delivering radiation for prostate cancer.

Results of 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) has been shown to decrease acute morbidity in the treatment of prostate cancer. Therapeutic outcome and late morbidity data have been accumulating. To evaluate the results of 3D CRT for the treatment of prostate cancer, we analyzed the outcome of a large series of patients treated with conformal techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 1987 through June 1994, 707 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with 3D CRT. Patients with pathologically-confirmed pelvic lymph node metastasis, treated with pre-irradiation (preRT) androgen ablation, or treated post-prostatectomy were excluded. All had CT obtained specifically for treatment planning, multiple structures contoured on the axial images, and beam's-eye view conformal beams edited to provide 3D dose coverage. Median follow-up is 36 mos; 70 patients have been followed longer than 5.5 years. Six hundred three had T1-T2 tumors. PreRT prostate specific antigen (PSA) was available for 649 patients: median preRT PSA was 12.9 ng/ml, 209 patients had preRT PSA > 20 ng/ml. The median dose of radiation was 69 Gy; 102 patients received > or = 69 Gy. Biochemical failure was defined as: 1) two consecutive PSA rises over 2.0 ng/ml if nadir PSA < or = 2.0 ng/ml, 2) two consecutive PSA rises over nadir if nadir PSA > 2.0 ng/ml, or 3) initiation of hormonal therapy after RT. Complications were graded using the RTOG system.

RESULTS

PreRT PSA and Gleason score emerged as independent indicators of biochemical control (bNED). Patients with preRT PSA > 10 had a significantly worse bNED at 5 years than patients with preRT PSA < or = 10. Five-year bNED was determined according to preRT PSA: PSA < or = 4, 88%; PSA > 4 < or = 10, 72%; PSA > 10 < or = 20, 43%; and PSA > 20, 30%. Patients with Gleason score > or = 7 also had a significantly worse bNED than patients with Gleason score < 7. Patients were divided into two prognostic groups: a favorable group with PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < 7, and T1-T2 tumors, and an unfavorable group with PSA > 10, Gleason score > or = 7 or T3-T4 tumors and studied for the effect of dose on bNED status. The bNED at 5 years was 75% for the favorable group and 37% for the unfavorable group. In addition, a group that might be considered a surgical subset was reviewed: patients with PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < or = 7, and T1-T2 tumors who were < 70 years old. This subset had an 84% 5-year bNED rate and 98% 5-year overall survival. Complications with the techniques used here are very low: 3% risk at 7 years of Grade 3-4 complications and 1% risk at 7 years of Grade 3 bladder complications (no Grade 4).

CONCLUSION

3D CRT allows for treatment of prostate cancers with a very low risk of complications. Patients with relatively early disease as defined by preRT PSA, Gleason score < 7, and T1-2 tumors and patients who are candidates for radical prostatectomy have excellent 5-year bNED rates. Patients with adverse prognostic factors have a high risk of biochemical recurrence and are candidates for innovative therapy.

[Planned 3-dimensional low-volume conformal irradiation of a local prostatic carcinoma]

AIM

Recent data have shown a significant reduction of acute side effects by means of a three-dimensional planned conformal radiotherapy of carcinoma of the prostate compared to treatment techniques used before. Theoretically, an optimized field coverage of the planning target volume should result in a reduction of treated bladder and rectum volumes. We studied the effects of individualized blocks on treatment volumes, planning target volumes, irradiated bladder and rectum volumes on basis of three-dimensional treatment planning by means of beam's-eye-view technique.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We compared dose-volume-histograms of 2 different planning models, a (fictitious) open 4-field-box-technique and a technique with conformal blocked fields designed from the beam's-eye-view display (prescribed dose 66 Gy, daily single fraction 2 Gy). Plans of 115 patients with localized prostate cancer treated from January 1994 to February 1996 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Using individualized fields treatment volume (covered by the 90%-isodose) was reduced by 23% on the average in comparison to the planning model without blocks. The averaged difference of treated volume and planning target volume, as a grade of efficiency of conformation, was reduced by 38% (496 cm3 303 cm3) using individualized blocks. 23% of the treated bladder volume and 13% of the treated rectum volume had been saved on the average. Nevertheless, at least 11.5% of the bladder volume and 27.6% of the contoured rectum volume were treated with the prescribed dose (55 Gy = 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison of dose-volume-histogram-data showed that especially high dose volumes of organs at risk had been saved by means of individualized blocks created from the beam's-eye-view. The blocks did not affect the dose distribution of the planning target volume adversely. Consequently the impact of these data on the extent of side effects and local tumor control has to be proven.

Low acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities in whole pelvic irradiation of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was done to determine the frequency and severity of acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity associated with whole pelvic radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1989 and 1994, we treated 156 patients with localized prostate cancer, ranging in age from 54 to 86 (median 71), of which 86 were older than 70 years of age. No attempt at selection was made, and many were from the Veteran's Administration Hospital where they had been precluded from their surgical program because of comorbidities and/or advanced age. Of 156 patients, 45 (28.8%) underwent pretreatment laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (LAP); 40 had negative findings. Four-field box technique was used for all patients. We treated the whole pelvis to 45 Gy, followed by a cone-down and a final boost to a total dose of 72 Gy. The cone-down to the lower pelvis and boost to the prostate were based on computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging findings for volume reconstruction with field size of approximately 8 x 8 and 6 x 6 cm, respectively. Diet instructions were given before treatment and emphasized weekly. Toxicities were evaluated weekly by physicians and nurses independently using Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) grading criteria.

RESULTS

The acute GI and GU toxicities gradually increased from Week 2, peaked at Week 5, and then declined after that. During Week 5, acute Grade 1-3 GI morbidities were observed in 19 (12.2%), 2 (1.3%), and 1 (0.6%) patients, respectively. Genitourinary toxicity was similar, accounting for 17 (10.9%), 6 (3.8%), and 1 (0.6%), respectively. Overall Grade 2 toxicities occurred in 30 of 156 patients (19%). Comorbidity was associated with more GI toxicity. Patients over 70 years of age tended to reach the maximal GI and GU toxicity 1-2 weeks earlier than did patients under the age of 70. Of the patients who did not follow the diet instruction, all experienced side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole pelvic irradiation was very well tolerated in this group of patients. The frequency of acute Grade 2 GI and GU toxicity compared favorably with the reported results of conformal treatment. Diet restriction and psychosocial input may have had a positive impact. Late sequelae will be evaluated in long-term follow-up.

Focal therapy for prostate cancer 1996: maximizing outcome

OBJECTIVES

To summarize improvements in patient selection and the results of focal therapy for the management of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

A contemporary series of patients managed with wide surgical excision, radiation therapy (three-dimensional conformal radiation, interstitial radiation, and charged-particle or proton therapy), and cryo-therapy were reviewed.

RESULTS

We used preoperative cancer grade, transrectal ultrasound, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in all patients, and cross-sectional imaging and bone scans in selected patients to allow for reasonably accurate cancer staging and selection of patients most likely to be cured by radical prostatectomy or radiation. In patients with extracapsular extension of prostate cancer, wide surgical excision and achievement of a clear surgical margin had therapeutic value. Newer radiation techniques resulted in a higher likelihood of prostate cancer control than previous techniques. Cryotherapy for patients with stages T1 through 3 prostate cancer was associated with a posttreatment undetectable PSA rate of 48% and a positive biopsy rate of 23%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with organ-confined and, therefore, curable prostate cancer can be identified. Well-performed radical prostatectomy, radiation, and cryotherapy are alternative treatments for the management of localized prostate cancer.

Potency probability following conformal megavoltage radiotherapy using conventional doses for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Impotence is a familiar sequela of definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer; however, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) has offered potency rates as high as 70% for selected for patients in several large series. To the authors' knowledge, age and stage-matched comparisons between the effects of EBRT and NSRP upon the normal age trend of impotence have not been performed. Herein, we report the change in potency over time in an EBRT-treated population, determine the significantly predisposing health factors affecting potency in this population, and compare age and stage-matched potency rates with those of normal males and prostatectomy patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our results are obtained from a retrospective study of 114 patients ranging in age from 52 to 85 (mean, 68) who were diagnosed with clinical stages A-C C (T1-T4N0M0) prostate cancer and then treated conformally with megavoltage x-rays to 6500-7000 cGy (180-200 cGy per fraction) using the four-field box technique. Information concerning pre-RT potency, medical and surgical history, and medications was documented for each patient as was time of post-RT change in potency during regular follow-up. The median follow-up time was 18.5 months.

RESULTS

The actuarial probability of potency for all patients gradually decreased throughout post-RT follow-up. At months 1, 12, 24, and 36, potency rates were 98, 92, 75, and 66%, respectively. For those patients who became impotent, the median time to impotence was 14 months. Factors identified from logistic regression analysis as significant predictors of post-EBRT impotence include pre-EBRT partial potency (p < 0.001), vascular disease (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p = 0.003). Next, an actuarial plot of potency probability to patient age for the EBRT-treated population was compared to that obtained from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study of normal males. The two curves were not significantly different (logrank test, p = 0.741) between ages 50 and 65. Finally, potency probability after follow-up of 1 year or more in EBRT-treated patients was stratified by age and substratified by clinical stage and then compared to similarly stratified potencies for patients treated with NSRP. The prostatectomy data were derived from the pooled data of six large (total n, 952), independent series conducted at academic centers. For patients older than 70 years, 79.1% of EBRT patients and 32.9% of NSRP patients remained potent after treatment. For patients with stage B2 disease, 75.0% of EBRT patients and 49.3% of NSRP patients remained potent after treatment. Overall EBRT patient potency was 76.1% vs. 66.2% for NSRP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

1) By 36 months after completion of EBRT for localized prostate cancer, fully one-third of all patients becomes impotent; however, for patients younger than 70 years, the probability of impotence does not depart significantly from that for normal males. 2) In the EBRT-treated population, pre-EBRT partial potency, vascular disease, and diabetes are the most significant predispositions to the development of impotence. Patients with these predispositions, though, do not become impotent significantly earlier than other patients. 3) When comparing age and stage-stratified potency rates for EBRT and NSRP patients, potency is roughly equal for both modalities for most age and stage groups; however, for patients older than 70 years or with stage B2 disease, EBRT offers notably higher posttreatment potency rates than NSRP. Thus, for the treatment of localized prostate cancer, EBRT may not affect the normal age trend of impotence in younger patients and may induce impotence less frequently than NSRP in older patients or in patients with later stage disease.

[The conformal radiotherapy of localized prostatic carcinoma: acute tolerance and early efficacy]

AIM

In a prospective trial early effectiveness and acute toxicity of conformal 3D-planned radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer was quantified using dose-volume-histogramms and evaluated with respect of treatment technique.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Thirty-two men (44 to 80 years old) with locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate (stage B2 or C) have been treated by 3D-planned conformal radiotherapy using high energy photons. In 28/32 men treatment technique was a monoaxial bisegmental rotation with irregular fields. With single doses of 2.0 Gy a mean total dose of 63.9 +/- 4.9 Gy according to ICRU was applied within 46 +/- 4 days. Maximum dose was in the mean 105.1% +/- 3.8%. 3D treatment volume was 274.1 +/- 113.4 cm3. Median follow-up is 1.8 years (15 to 34 months). Toxicity was evaluated according to RTOG-EORTC by patient interview and physical examination on a weekly basis during radiotherapy and by regular follow-up.

RESULTS

Eleven patients had none, 15 mild (RTOG grade 1) and 6 moderate symptoms (RTOG grade 2, mainly diarrhoea, dysuria and polyuria). Acute complications leading to treatment interruption did not occur. In 16 patients symptoms disappeared within 6 weeks after radiotherapy. Only 2 men had symptoms which lasted longer than 3 months and were endoscopically examined. Up to now no late complications were detected. Incidence and severity of toxicity was significantly (p < 0.05) related to the size of treatment volume. Acute toxicity was found to depend statistically significant (p < 0.05) on the proportional volume of bladder and rectum, irradiated with more than 35 Gy. In 81% of the patients with pretherapeutic elevated PSA levels normalisation of PSA was observed. Overall mean PSA levels of 15.7 +/- 22.6 micrograms/l at the beginning of radiotherapy fell to 2.1 +/- 3.7 micrograms/l 6 weeks after irradiation. Only 1 Patient relapsed locally 22 months after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that due to modern 3D-planned conformal techniques with optimization of treatment dose and improved protection of critical organs such as urinary bladder and rectum, radiotherapy allows an effective and well tolerated therapy of localized prostatic carcinoma.