Electron arc therapy of the postmastectomy prosthetic breast

Delivery time reduction for mixed photon-electron radiotherapy by using photon MLC collimated electron arcs

Objective. Electron arcs in mixed-beam radiotherapy (Arc-MBRT) consisting of intensity-modulated electron arcs with dynamic gantry rotation potentially reduce the delivery time compared to mixed-beam radiotherapy containing electron beams with static gantry angle (Static-MBRT). This study aims to develop and investigate a treatment planning process (TPP) for photon multileaf collimator (pMLC) based Arc-MBRT.Approach. An existing TPP for Static-MBRT plans is extended to integrate electron arcs with a dynamic gantry rotation and intensity modulation using a sliding window technique. The TPP consists of a manual setup of electron arcs, and either static photon beams or photon arcs, shortening of the source-to-surface distance for the electron arcs, initial intensity modulation optimization, selection of a user-defined number of electron beam energies based on dose contribution to the target volume and finally, simultaneous photon and electron intensity modulation optimization followed by full Monte Carlo dose calculation. Arc-MBRT plans, Static-MBRT plans, and photon-only plans were created and compared for four breast cases. Dosimetric validation of two Arc-MBRT plans was performed using film measurements.Main results. The generated Arc-MBRT plans are dosimetrically similar to the Static-MBRT plans while outperforming the photon-only plans. The mean heart dose is reduced by 32% on average in the MBRT plans compared to the photon-only plans. The estimated delivery times of the Arc-MBRT plans are similar to the photon-only plans but less than half the time of the Static-MBRT plans. Measured and calculated dose distributions agree with a gamma passing rate of over 98% (3% global, 2 mm) for both delivered Arc-MBRT plans.Significance. A TPP for Arc-MBRT is successfully developed and Arc-MBRT plans showed the potential to improve the dosimetric plan quality similar as Static-MBRT while maintaining short delivery times of photon-only treatments. This further facilitates integration of pMLC-based MBRT into clinical practice.

Electron modulated arc therapy (EMAT) using photon MLC for postmastectomy chest wall treatment I: Monte Carlo-based dosimetric characterizations

PURPOSE

To study the dosimetric properties of electron arc beams delivered by photon-beam multi-leaf collimators (pMLC) in electron modulated arc therapy (EMAT) for postmastectomy chest wall treatments.

METHODS

Using the Monte Carlo method, we simulated a 2100EX Varian linear accelerator and verified the beam models in a water tank. Dosimetric characterizations were performed on cylindrical water phantoms of elliptical bases with various field sizes, arc ranges and source-to-surface distances (SSDs) for 6, 9 and 12 MeV beam energy.

RESULTS

The arc beam has a higher bremsstrahlung dose than the static beam at the isocenter due to crossfire, but choosing a field size greater than 5 cm effectively reduces the bremsstrahlung dose. The depths of the 90% maximum dose located at 1.7, 2.8 and 4.1 cm for 6, 9 and 12 MeV, respectively, are similar to those of the static beams and independent of the field size and arc range.

CONCLUSION

Based on the study, we recommend using the 5 cm field width for electron arc beams considering both bremsstrahlung dose at the isocenter and the arc profile penumbra. To ensure sufficient PTV edge coverage, we recommend a field length extension of at least 4 cm from PTV's edge for all beam energies and an arc extension of around 7°, 5°, and 5° for beam energies 6, 9, and 12 MeV, respectively. These dosimetric characterizations are the basis of pMLC-delivered EMAT treatment planning for postmastectomy chest wall patients.

Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25

The goal of Task Group 25 (TG-25) of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of.Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) was to provide a methodology and set of procedures for a medical physicist performing clinical electron beam dosimetry in the nominal energy range of 5-25 MeV. Specifically, the task group recommended procedures for acquiring basic information required for acceptance testing and treatment planning of new accelerators with therapeutic electron beams. Since the publication of the TG-25 report, significant advances have taken place in the field of electron beam dosimetry, the most significant being that primary standards laboratories around the world have shifted from calibration standards based on exposure or air kerma to standards based on absorbed dose to water. The AAPM has published a new calibration protocol, TG-51, for the calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams. The formalism and dosimetry procedures recommended in this protocol are based on the absorbed dose to water calibration coefficient of an ionization chamber at 60Co energy, N60Co(D,w), together with the theoretical beam quality conversion coefficient k(Q) for the determination of absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon and electron beams. Task Group 70 was charged to reassess and update the recommendations in TG-25 to bring them into alignment with report TG-51 and to recommend new methodologies and procedures that would allow the practicing medical physicist to initiate and continue a high quality program in clinical electron beam dosimetry. This TG-70 report is a supplement to the TG-25 report and enhances the TG-25 report by including new topics and topics that were not covered in depth in the TG-25 report. These topics include procedures for obtaining data to commission a treatment planning computer, determining dose in irregularly shaped electron fields, and commissioning of sophisticated special procedures using high-energy electron beams. The use of radiochromic film for electrons is addressed, and radiographic film that is no longer available has been replaced by film that is available. Realistic stopping-power data are incorporated when appropriate along with enhanced tables of electron fluence data. A larger list of clinical applications of electron beams is included in the full TG-70 report available at http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports. Descriptions of the techniques in the clinical sections are not exhaustive but do describe key elements of the procedures and how to initiate these programs in the clinic. There have been no major changes since the TG-25 report relating to flatness and symmetry, surface dose, use of thermoluminescent dosimeters or diodes, virtual source position designation, air gap corrections, oblique incidence, or corrections for inhomogeneities. Thus these topics are not addressed in the TG-70 report.

Application of the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm to electron arc therapy

This project investigated the potential of summing fixed-beam dose distributions calculated using the pencil-beam redefinition algorithm (PBRA) at small angular steps (1 degree) to model an electron arc therapy beam. The PRBA, previously modified to model skin collimation, was modified further by incorporating two correction factors. One correction factor that is energy, SSD (source-to-surface distance), and field-width dependent constrained the calculated dose output to be the same as the measured dose output for fixed-beam geometries within the range of field widths and SSDs encountered in arc therapy. Another correction factor (single field-width correction factor for each energy) compensated for large-angle scattering not being modeled, allowing a more accurate calculation of dose output at mid arc. The PBRA was commissioned to accurately calculate dose in a water phantom for fixed-beam geometries typical of electron arc therapy. Calculated central-axis depth doses agreed with measured doses to within 2% in the low-dose gradient regions and within 1-mm in the high-dose gradient regions. Off-axis doses agreed to within 2 mm in the high-dose gradient regions and within 3% in the low-dose gradient regions. Arced-beam calculations of dose output and depth dose at mid arc were evaluated by comparing to data measured using two cylindrical water phantoms with radii of 12 and 15 cm at 10 and 15 MeV. Dose output was measured for all combinations of phantom radii of curvature, collimator widths (4, 5, and 6 cm), and arc angles (0 degrees, 20 degrees, 40 degrees, 60 degrees, 80 degrees, and 90 degrees) for both beam energies. Results showed the calculated mid-arc dose output to agree within 2% of measurement for all combinations. For a 90 degree arc angle and 5 x 20 cm2 field size, the calculated mid-arc depth dose in the low-dose gradient region agreed to within 2% of measurement for all depths at 10 MeV and for depths greater than depth of dose maximum R100 at 15 MeV. For depths in the buildup region at 15 MeV the calculations overestimated the measured dose by as much as 3.4%. Mid-arc depth dose in the high-dose gradient region agreed to within 2.2 mm of measured dose. Calculated two-dimensional relative dose distributions in the plane of rotation were compared to dose measurements using film in a cylindrical polystyrene phantom for a 90 degree arc angle and field widths of 4, 5, and 6 cm at 10 and 15 MeV. Results showed that off-axis dose at the ends of arc (without skin collimation) agreed to within 2% in the low-dose gradient region and to within 1.2 mm in the high-dose gradient region. This work showed that the accuracy of the PBRA arced-beam dose model met the criteria specified by Van Dyk et al. [Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 26, 261-273 (1993)] with the exception of the buildup region of the 15 MeV beam. Based on the present results, results of a previous study showing acceptable accuracy in the presence of skin collimation, and results of a previous study showing acceptable accuracy in the presence of internal heterogeneities, it is concluded that the PBRA arced-beam dose model should be adequate for planning electron arc therapy.

Local???Regional Radiation Therapy After Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Appropriate Target Volume?

The oncologic safety and cosmetic outcome of immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients requiring radiation therapy remains ill-defined. Between 1980 and 1998, 18 patients were treated at the University of Utah Medical Center with mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction, and adjuvant radiation therapy delivered via an electron arc technique. A case-control study was performed matching reconstructed patients in a 1:2 ratio with patients undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction, using number of lymph nodes and tumor size. Median follow-up was 61 months for the reconstructed group. Five-year local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 87%, 58%, and 74% respectively in the reconstructed group, versus 88%, 57%, and 67% respectively in the matched control group. Cosmesis was good/excellent in 11 of 13 living patients (85%). Significant capsular contraction occurred in 18% of prosthetic reconstruction patients, and revisional surgery was required in 24% of prosthetic reconstruction patients. Utilizing the electron arc technique, the median radiation dose to the chest wall at the midlevel of the ribs was 20% of the prescribed dose, and no patient failed deep to the implant. These results suggest that in appropriately selected patients, structures deep to the reconstruction are not at high risk for local-regional recurrence, and immediate breast reconstruction yields comparable local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates to nonreconstructed patients, with acceptable cosmetic results.

Electron arc irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall in locally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate local-regional control and overall survival in women with locally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with postmastectomy electron arc therapy. Postmastectomy electron arc irradiation was used to treat 39 women with isolated local-regional recurrence of breast cancer following mastectomy, and 14 patients with MBC who had, or who were at high risk of, local-regional recurrence. After computed tomography treatment planning, patients were treated with electron arc radiotherapy to a median dose of 59.3 Gy. The median follow-up for alive patients was 45.4 months. For patients with local-regional recurrence, the 5-year local-regional control and overall survival rates were 74% and 43%, respectively. The 2-year overall survival was greater for those patients with a disease-free interval greater than 24 months when compared to patients with a disease-free interval less than 24 months (83% vs. 60%, respectively); however, the median survival was not significantly different (57.6 and 58.6 months, respectively). Patients with a solitary nodule at recurrence had an improved 5-year overall survival of 58% compared with 40% for patients with multiple lesions. For patients with metastatic disease, the 5-year local-regional control and overall survival rates were 76% and 31%, respectively. Local-regional control can be achieved in the majority of patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer (74%) or MBC (76%) who had, or who were, at high risk of local-regional recurrence treated with postmastectomy electron arc irradiation.

Electron arc irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall with CT treatment planning: 20-year experience

PURPOSE

Since 1980, electron arc irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall has been the preferred radiotherapy technique at the University of Utah for patients with advanced breast cancer. We report the results of this technique in 156 consecutive Stage IIA-IIIB patients treated from 1980 to 1998.

METHODS

CT treatment planning was used in all patients to identify chest wall thickness and internal mammary lymph node depth. Computerized dosimetry was used to deliver total doses of 50 Gy in 5-1/2 weeks to the chest wall and the internal mammary lymph nodes with electron arc therapy. Patients were assessed for local, regional, and distant control of disease and for survival. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards were modeled using a hierarchical nonproportional semiparametric model testing the following prognostic factors: age, stage, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, estrogen receptor status, and dose. End points evaluated included disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Eighty-one percent of patients were at high risk for local-regional failure because of > T2 primary tumor or > 3 positive axillary lymph nodes. The median number of positive lymph nodes was 5, and the median tumor size was 3.5 cm. Actuarial 10-year local-regional control and overall survival were 95% and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the only factor prognostic for disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival was the number of positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001). The 10-year rates of local-regional control for patients with 0, 1-3, 4-9, and > or = 10 involved lymph nodes were 100%, 98%, 93%, and 89%, respectively. The only rates of acute and chronic radiotherapy toxicity > or = 2 by RTOG/EORTC criteria were skin related and observed in 44% and 10% for acute and late reactions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate excellent local-regional control rates with electron arc therapy of the postmastectomy chest wall in patients with advanced breast cancer. Our 20-year experience with electron arc radiotherapy has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this technique. The advantage of this technique is that the internal mammary lymph node chain can be easily encompassed while the dose to heart and lung is minimized; it also obviates match lines in areas of high risk.

Electron arc irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall: clinical results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Since 1980 electron arc irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall has been the preferred technique for patients with advanced breast cancer at our institution. Here we report the results of this technique in 140 consecutive patients treated from 1980 to 1993.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thoracic computerized tomography was used to determine internal mammary lymph node depth and chest wall thickness, and for computerized dosimetry calculations. Total doses of 45-50 Gy in 5 to 5 1/2 weeks were delivered to the chest wall and internal mammary lymph nodes via electron arc and, in most cases, supraclavicular and axillary nodes were treated with a matching photon field. Patients were assessed for acute and late radiation changes, local and distant control of disease, and survival. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year after completion of radiation treatment, and a mean follow up interval of 49 months and a median of 33 months. All patients had advanced disease: T stages 1, 2, 3, and 4 represented 21%, 39%, 21% and 19% of the study population, with a mean number of positive axillary lymph nodes of 6.5 (range, 0-29). Analysis was performed according to adjuvant status (no residual disease, n = 90), residual disease (positive margin, n = 15, and primary radiation, n = 2), or recurrent disease (n = 33).

RESULTS

Acute radiation reactions were generally mild and self limiting. A total of 26% of patients developed moist desquamation, and 32% had brisk erythema. Actuarial 5 year local-regional control, freedom from distant failure, and cause-specific survival was 91%, 64%, and 75% in the adjuvant group; 84%, 50%, and 53% in the residual disease group; and 63%, 34%, and 32% in the recurrent disease group, respectively. In univariate Cox regressions, the number of positive lymph nodes was predictive for local failure in the adjuvant group (P = 0.037). Chronic complications were minimal with 11% of patients having arm edema, 17% hyperpigmentation, and 13% telangectasia formation.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that local-regional control with electron are therapy of the postmastectomy chest wall is comparable to photon techniques. Acute radiation reactions are well tolerated and mostly of minor extent. A previous report demonstrated a significant reduction in the dose-volume relationship of the lung using the electron arc compared with two photon techniques. Consequently, with careful attention to treatment planning and dosimetry, electron arc therapy of the postmastectomy chest wall is safe and effective. The radiation dose to heart and lung is minimized without compromise on local control.