Salvage irradiation by brachytherapy of velotonsillar squamous cell carcinoma in a previously irradiated field: results in 73 cases

Salvage brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in previously irradiated areas: carcinologic and toxicity outcomes of 25 patients

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of salvage brachytherapy for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in previously irradiated areas.

Material and methods

This was a retrospective study with 25 patients, treated between 1997 and 2016 for primary (21 cases) or recurrent (4 cases) oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in previously irradiated areas. Fifteen patients were treated with salvage brachytherapy (BT) alone, while 10 patients additionally received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Median BT dose was 45 Gy (range, 15-64 Gy), and a median total cumulative dose was 57 Gy (range, 40-70 Gy). Patient age, tumor stage, radiotherapy dose, and time between first treatment and recurrence were analyzed as prognostic factors.

Results

Median overall survival (OS) was 16 months. Patients with less advanced (T1) tumors survived significantly longer (27 vs. 14.5 months, p = 0.046). Five patients experienced a local recurrence, and only one of them was treated with a total dose greater than 60 Gy. In multivariate analysis, patients with T1 lesions had a significant higher OS rate compared to patients with larger lesions (HR = 6.25, 95% CI: 1.18-33.1%, p = 0.031). Patients who received more than 60 Gy had a non-significant, 80% increased OS than those treated with a lower dose (p = 0.072). There was four grade 3 acute toxicities, and no grade 3 or more late toxicities.

Conclusions

Multimodal treatment, including salvage BT, may offer a curative option for selected patients with an acceptable risk of severe toxicity for the treatment of primary or recurrent tumors in previously irradiated areas.

Brachytherapy of the head and neck: An University of California Los Angeles guide to morbidity reduction

The head and neck (H&N) region is among the most intricate and functional part of our anatomy. Major functional nerves and blood vessels with importance that affect the entire body emanate from the base of skull. Brachytherapy plays an important role as a single modality therapy in early cancer of the lip and oral cavity and a supplemental role in the pharynx or in advanced or recurrent disease. Morbidity in the H&N is intensely personal and disabling. Its avoidance is critical in determining the success or failure of a treatment program, and it is essential to preservation of quality of life. This article summarizes the current literature regarding morbidity related to H&N brachytherapy to aid patients and physicians to achieve optimal outcomes.

[Brachytherapy for head and neck cancers]

The main indications of the brachytherapy of head and neck cancers are the limited tumours of the lip, the nose, the oral cavity and the oropharynx. Nasopharynx tumours are nowadays treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. This technique can be exclusive, associated with external radiotherapy or postoperative. It can also be a salvage treatment for the second primaries in previously irradiated areas. If the low dose rate brachytherapy rules remain the reference, the pulse dose rate technique allows the prescription of the dose rate and the optimisation of the dose distribution. Results of high dose rate brachytherapy are now published. This paper reports the recommendations of the Gec-ESTRO, published in 2017, and takes into account the data of the historical low dose rate series, and is upgraded with the pulsed-dose rate and high dose rate series.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head & neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update - Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology

The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.

Brachytherapy for radiotherapy-resistant head and neck cancer: A review of a single center experience

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Despite advances in radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments for head and neck cancers, the local failure rate is high. In most radiotherapy-resistant cases, surgery is performed; however, some cases are considered unresectable. No standard treatment for these situations has been established. In this study, we review our experience with brachytherapy (BT), which has a different biological mechanism than standard radiotherapy.

METHODS

All patients received prior radiation to the recurrence area. Median high-dose radiation BT dose was 50 Gy, administered in 5 to 10 Gy fractions twice daily for 5 days. High-dose radiation was given via four to 10 catheters inserted under local anesthesia (3 patients) or general anesthesia with preventive tracheostomy (10 patients).

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received BT from 2010 to 2014. Male:female ratio was 1.6:1, and median age was 66 years (range 23-89). Of those 13 patients, 10 patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity, two patients with SCC of the nasal mucosa, and one patient with eccrine duct carcinoma. Prior radiation dose ranged from 60 to 70 Gy. Local control was achieved in 11 of 13 patients; only 15.3% (2 of 13) had in-field recurrence. Five patients developed local out-of-field recurrence, and two developed distant metastases. Five patients are alive with no evidence of disease. No major toxicities were encountered. Two patients had severe mucositis and recovered within several weeks.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy for radiotherapy-resistant head and neck cancers is feasible with minor adverse events, which enables good local control. However, many advanced head and neck cancers develop regional or distant metastases; therefore, additional treatment should be suggested.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 126:2246-2251, 2016.

Multi institutional phase II study of concomitant stereotactic reirradiation and cetuximab for recurrent head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

Recurrent head and neck cancer is associated to a poor survival prognosis. A high toxicity rate is demonstrated when surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy are combined. Furthermore, the duration of treatment is often not ethically compatible with the expected survival (median survival<1year). Normal tissues tolerance limits the use of reirradiation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could offer precise irradiation while sparing healthy tissues. After completion of a feasibility study, results of a multicentric study (Lille, Nancy & Nice) using SBRT with cetuximab are reported. The aim of the study was to deliver non toxic short course SBRT (2weeks) in order to get the same local control as the one demonstrated with longer protocols.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with inoperable recurrent, or new primary tumor in a previously irradiated area, were included (WHO<3). Reirradiation (RT) dose was 36Gy in six fractions of 6Gy to the 85% isodose line covering 95% of the PTV with 5 injections of concomitant cetuximab (CT). All patients had previous radiotherapy, 85% had previous surgery and 48% previous chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between 11/2007 and 08/2010, 60 were included (46 men and 14 women), 56 received CT+RT, 3 were not treated and 1 received only CT. Median age was 60 (42-87)) and all 56 patients had squamous carcinoma and received concomitant cetuximab. Mean time between previous radiotherapy and the start of SBRT was 38months. Cutaneous toxicity was observed for 41 patients. There was one toxic death from hemorrhage and denutrition. Median follow-up was 11.4months. At 3months, response rate was 58.4% (95% CI: 43.2-72.4%) and disease control rate was 91.7% (95% CI: 80.0-97.7%). The one-year OS rate was 47.5% (95% CI: 30.8-62.4).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that short SBRT with cetuximab is an effective salvage treatment with good response rate in this poor prognosis population with previously irradiated HNC. Treatment is feasible and, with appropriate care to limiting critical structure, acute toxicities are acceptable. This combination may be the reference treatment is this population.

[Reirradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers]

Recurrences or second primary head and neck cancers meant, for a long time, therapeutic dead ends. Surgery was the standard treatment, but could only be achieved in 25% of the patients. The GETTEC-GORTEC (99-01) randomized trial showed that radiochemotherapy improved disease-free survival for a highly selected population. For inoperable patients, three options can be discussed: supportive care only, chemotherapy or radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The EXTREME protocol showed that combining platinum, 5FU and cetuximab improved overall survival for recurrent or metastatic forms. This is certainly the best option for advanced forms, which are not accessible to radiotherapy. Concerning radiotherapy, only one randomized trial compared chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy alone using methotrexate. The overall survival, the main objective in this study, was not improved, however, the enrollment was incomplete and included many advanced stage tumors. Other articles are based on Vokes' initial work of radiochemotherapy delivered in split-course over a period of 11 weeks. All conventional and conformational radiotherapy series showed improved local control and disease-free survival rates, but at the expense of acute and late toxicities demanding a drastic patients selection. New radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have reduced toxicities with a likely oncological results improvement, offering treatments which are spread over six to seven weeks for IMRT and two weeks for SBRT. The better treatment tolerance allows an increasing number of eligible patients. The main future objective will be to define the specific IMRT and SBRT indications.

Salvage stereotactic reirradiation with or without cetuximab for locally recurrent head-and-neck cancer: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

Normal tissues tolerance limits the use of reirradiation for recurrent head-and-neck cancers (HNC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could offer precise irradiation while sparing healthy tissues. Results of a feasibility study using SBRT with or without cetuximab are reported for reirradiation of recurrent primary HNC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with inoperable recurrent, or new primary tumor, in a previously irradiated area were included. Reirradiation dose was 36 Gy in six fractions of 6 Gy to the 85% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma received concomitant cetuximab.

RESULTS

Between June 2007 and January 2010, 40 patients were prospectively treated for 43 lesions. Median age was 60 and median tumor size was 29 mm. Fifteen patients received concomitant cetuximab and 1 received concomitant cisplatin. Median follow-up was 25.6 months with 34 patients evaluable for tumor response. Median overall survival was 13.6 months and response rate was 79.4% (15 complete and 12 partial responses). Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 4 patients.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that short SBRT with or without cetuximab is an effective salvage treatment with good response rate in this poor prognosis population with previously irradiated HNC. Treatment is feasible and, with appropriate care to limiting critical structure, acute toxicities are acceptable. A prospective multicenter Phase II trial of SRT and concomitant cetuximab in recurrent HNC squamous cell carcinoma is ongoing.

Use of customized-mold brachytherapy in the management of malignancies arising in the maxillary antrum after maxillectomy: a dosimetric analysis

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of a intraoral mold high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in the treatment of tumors arising in the maxillary antrum after maxillectomy and to describe the dosimetric profile of HDR brachytherapy in such an unusual location.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A customized mold with four 6-French catheters was designed and produced in transparent acrylic resin. The catheters formed a soft loop that allowed the passage of the HDR source. CT-based dose evaluation in several volumes of interest, including the gross tumor volume (GTV) and several organs at risk (OARs), such as the skin of the cheek, eyeball, lens, optic nerve, optic chiasm, and spinal cord was performed.

RESULTS

Treatments were delivered uneventfully. A favorable OAR/GTV ratio was observed. The GTV D(90) was covered by the 3.8 Gy isodose (95% of the prescription isodose of 4 Gy) and the doses received by the OARs varied between 4% and 43% of the prescription isodose for the V1 cc of spinal cord and eyeball, respectively. The only structure that could not be adequately spared was the skin overlying the tumoral lesion that received between 94% and 107% of the prescription isodose (1.0 and 0.5 cm(2) of skin, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoral mold-based HDR brachytherapy can be used to treat tumors involving the maxillary antrum provided that access is possible through a previous maxillectomy. A dose reduction of 4-43% in several OARs, such as the spinal cord, pituitary gland, optic chiasm, optic nerve, eyeball, and lens, is obtained.

Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for reirradiation of head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an appealing treatment option after previous radiotherapy because of its precision, conformality, and reduced treatment duration. We report our experience with reirradiation using fractionated SRS for head-and-neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2002 to 2008, 65 patients received SRS to the oropharynx (n = 13), hypopharynx (n = 8), nasopharynx (n = 7), paranasal sinus (n = 7), neck (n = 7), and other sites (n = 23). Thirty-eight patients were treated definitively and 27 patients with metastatic disease and/or untreated local disease were treated palliatively. Nine patients underwent complete macroscopic resection before SRS. Thirty-three patients received concurrent chemoradiation. The median initial radiation dose was 67 Gy, and the median reirradiation SRS dose was 30 Gy (21-35 Gy) in 2-5 fractions.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for surviving patients was 16 months. Fifty-six patients were evaluable for response: 30 (54%) had complete, 15 (27%) had partial, and 11 (20%) had no response. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 12 months. For definitively treated patients, the 2-year OS and locoregional control (LRC) rates were 41% and 30%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher total dose, surgical resection, and nasopharynx site were significantly associated with improved LRC; surgical resection and nonsquamous histology were associated with improved OS. Seven patients (11%) experienced severe reirradiation-related toxicity, including one treatment-attributed death.

CONCLUSION

SRS reirradiation for head-and-neck cancer is feasible. This study demonstrates encouraging response rates with acceptable toxicity. Fractionated SRS reirradiation with concurrent chemotherapy in select patients warrants further study.

Concurrent chemotherapy and re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer

Recurrent and second primary tumors arising within a previously radiated head and neck volume represent a difficult clinical scenario to manage. For patients who have resectable disease, surgery is the standard treatment. Chemotherapy is the standard for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease but offers no chance for cure. Re-irradiation (RRT) with concurrent chemotherapy is a potentially curative treatment option. In this article, we will review the basis for current chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens used in previously radiated patients, focusing on outcome and toxicity. Additionally, we will review radiotherapy techniques used in this setting and highlight the differences between definitive radiotherapy and RRT. Controversies, such as the utility of chemotherapy and RRT following surgical salvage, will be addressed. Finally, we will review investigations seeking to improve the therapeutic outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy and RRT.

[CyberKnife robotic stereotactic radiotherapy: technical aspects and medical indications]

In 2006, 3 sites have been selected by the Institut national of cancer (Lille, Nancy et Nice) to evaluate a radiotherapy robot, the CyberKnife. This machine, able to track mobile tumours in real time, gives new possibilities in the field of extra cranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Functionalities and medico economical issues of the machine will be evaluated during 2 years on the 3 sites.

Interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of recurrent head and neck malignancies

BACKGROUND

Recurrent head and neck malignancies are therapeutically challenging. Brachytherapy is a retreatment alternative to external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

METHODS

Patients receiving brachytherapy during 1987-2004 for recurrent head and neck cancer were identified. Tumor and treatment characteristics and toxicities were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were generated. The influence of prognostic factors was determined.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were analyzable. Analysis was limited to patients who had brachytherapy for a first recurrence (n = 45). Brachytherapy (> or = 55 Gy) was a monotherapy in 22 of 45 patients. As part of their salvage brachytherapy treatments, 14 patients also underwent surgery; 3 patients also underwent EBRT; and 6 patients underwent surgery, EBRT, and brachytherapy. Retreatment morbidity included acute toxicity (n = 7) and late toxicity (n = 18). Median PFS was 15 months, and locoregional control rates at 1 and 2 years were 50% and 37%, respectively. Time to progression differed by site of the primary tumor (p = .10). Median OS was 16 months, and OS at 2 and 5 years was 33% and 11%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer has an acceptable toxicity profile and is viable alternative to EBRT. Further optimization of the best sites and doses for neck brachytherapy is required.

Exclusive brachytherapy for T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the velotonsillar area: Results in 44 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of interstitial brachytherapy as an exclusive radiotherapy modality for primary T1-T2 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the velotonsillar area.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1992 and 2000, 44 patients with T1-T2 SCC of the tonsil (n = 36) and soft palate (n = 8) were treated to the primary with brachytherapy alone (37 patients) or after a limited resection (7 patients). Eight patients had prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for previous head-and-neck carcinoma. Nineteen patients had initial neck dissection. The mean brachytherapy dose was 58.7 Gy, and the mean reference dose rate and Ir-192 linear activity were 58.2 cGy/h and 1.51 mCi/cm respectively.

RESULTS

With a 75-month median follow-up, 1 patient recurred locally. Isolated nodal relapses occurred in 4 patients, none of whom had initial neck dissection, and salvage therapy was successful in 2. Five-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 76% and 68%, respectively. Full-course radiation therapy was possible in 7 of 12 patients who developed a second primary head-and-neck carcinoma. Late toxicity was limited to 6 mild soft-tissue necroses, and was significantly associated with previous surgery to the primary and high linear activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Exclusive brachytherapy for T1-T2 velotonsillar carcinomas is safe and effective, and permits definitive reirradiation for a second head-and-neck cancer. Initial neck dissection should be performed for optimal selection for exclusive brachytherapy.

Treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer: re-irradiation or chemotherapy?

For most patients with head and neck cancer, locoregional disease recurrence carries an extremely poor prognosis and has severe adverse effects on quality of life. Only a few patients are suitable for salvage surgery and, even in selected cases, the success rate is low. Most patients are managed by supportive palliative care, or with palliative chemotherapy. In the UK, re-irradiation is rarely used because of concerns about treatment-related toxicity and lack of efficacy. Despite this, a significant body of evidence suggests that re-irradiation may have a higher probability of achieving local control than other treatments. In this review, we discuss the use of re-irradiation in patients with locally recurrent head and neck cancer, and present the pertinent data.

Salvage high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for recurrent head-and-neck cancer

BACKGROUND

A significant portion of head-and-neck cancer patients will develop persistent or recurrent disease after definitive treatment. Radiation therapy is often used as definitive therapy or as an adjunct to surgery. Recurrent cancer of the head and neck in the previously irradiated field is, thus, a common occurrence and poses a therapeutic challenge. Some studies have evaluated low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as a therapeutic option, including a large case series with long-term follow-up by our own institution. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy offers therapeutic advantages over LDR brachytherapy. This study evaluates the local control and outcomes of patients with previously irradiated recurrent head-and-neck cancer treated with HDR interstitial brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1997 and 2002, 30 patients who received prior radiation therapy for primary tumors of the head and neck were treated for biopsy-proven recurrent disease. All patients received previous radiation as definitive therapy alone or as adjunct to surgery. All patients were inoperable, refused surgery, or had gross residual disease after salvage surgery for their recurrent disease. Thirty-six sites on the 30 patients were implanted by application of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy techniques with mean tumor dose of 34 Gy (18-48 Gy) in twice daily fractions of 300 to 400 cGy per fraction.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of 12 months, local tumor control was achieved in 69% of implanted sites. Disease-specific survival at 1 and 2 years was 54% and 45%, respectively. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 56% and 37%, respectively. Grade 3/4 late complications occurred in 16% of the patients. No fatal complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

HDR brachytherapy can play an important role in the salvage treatment of previously irradiated recurrent head-and-neck cancer. This study shows that comparable results are obtained by HDR brachytherapy with fewer late complications than were indicated by previously reported data for LDR brachytherapy.

A review on re-irradiation for recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer

The purpose of this paper is to review the results of studies regarding radiation as primary or adjuvant treatment modality for head and neck recurrences or second primary tumours (SPT) in previously irradiated areas, with emphasis on acute and late radiation induced morbidity, locoregional control and survival. The criteria for the studies to be included in this review were: (1) re-irradiation for locoregional recurrent disease or SPT in the head and neck region, (2) squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx, and (3) a minimum of 10 patients included in the study. Studies were divided in four categories, including (1) external beam re-irradiation, (2) re-irradiation with brachytherapy, (3) re-irradiation in combination with chemotherapy and (4) postoperative re-irradiation. Most studies were retrospective using heterogeneous treatment regimens and including heterogeneous groups of patients. A total number of 27 studies were included. Overall survival, locoregional control and acute and late radiation-induced morbidity are reported. High dose reirradiation as salvage treatment in case of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer should be considered, particularly when salvage surgery is not feasible. Although long term survivors are reported is some studies, the relatively high incidence of treatment-related morbidity emphasize the need for further optimisation in order to improve locoregional control and reduce the risk on late morbidity.

Reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancers with curative intent

In patients with recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer, the traditional therapy of palliative single- or multi-agent chemotherapy yields a 30% to 40% response rate with median survival durations of 8 to 10 months. However, long-term survival is rarely observed. Reirradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy is currently under investigation as a treatment option in these patients. While reirradiation without chemotherapy appears to be effective in recurrent nasopharynx cancer cases, the use of concomitant chemotherapy with reirradiation appears to offer improved outcomes based on phase I/II data in other head and neck sites. Recent studies indicate that long-term survival of patients is possible following reirradiation in a minority of cases despite severe acute and chronic toxicities. Reirradiation with chemotherapy is appropriate for patients with a goal of long-term local control of disease and curative intent, despite the risk of significant acute and late toxicities.

The role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze the value of interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (iBT) with regard to local control and the incidence of side effects in patients with head-and-neck cancer in a previously irradiated area.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From October 1997 to September 2001, 43 patients with head-and-neck cancer in a previously irradiated area (31 patients with recurrent cancer) were treated with iBT alone or in combination with external beam radiation. Thirty-four of 43 patients received interstitial PDR brachytherapy (DREF=20-60 Gy) as part of their curative treatment regimen alone or in combination with external radiation. Nine patients were implanted for palliative purposes. The pulses were delivered 24 h/day with a time interval of 1 h between two pulses. The dose per pulse (dp) ranged from 0.4-0.7 Gy. Sixteen of 43 (37%) patients also received cisplatin or carboplatin with 5-fluorouracil during the time of the iBT. Additionally 20/43 (47%) patients were treated with interstitial hyperthermia. Thirteen of 43 (30%) patients received external beam radiation in a dose range from 20-67 Gy. A follow-up of all patients was done to analyze local control and survival, and acute and delayed toxicity. This analysis was performed after a median follow-up of 24 months (6-48 months).

RESULTS

Local tumor control was achieved in 34 of a total of 43 patients (79%) and in 30/34 patients (88%) treated for curative intention. Distant metastases were observed in 5/43 (12%) patients. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival rates, disease-free survival rates, and overall survival rates according to the Kaplan-Meier method for all patients were 68%, 62%, and 49%, respectively, and for patients treated with curative intention they were 80%, 77% and 66%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the probability of local recurrence in patients subgrouped by recurrent tumor vs. secondary primary, tumor size, grading and lymphangiosis. The application of chemotherapy or hyperthermia did not have significant influence on the therapy results. Soft tissue necrosis was the only serious side effect seen in 2/43 patients (4.7%). No other serious side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer is an effective therapy with minimal toxicity. The role of chemotherapy and hyperthermia in these patients remains unclear. Further randomized studies with larger patient numbers are necessary to draw a definite conclusion.

Interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy as a salvage treatment for recurrent head-and-neck cancers: long-term results

PURPOSE

Recurrent cancers of the head and neck within previously irradiated volume pose a serious therapeutic challenge. This study evaluates the response and long-term tumor control of recurrent head-and-neck cancers treated with interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1979 and 1997, 220 patients with prior radiation therapy with or without surgery for primary tumors of the head and neck were treated for recurrent disease or new primary tumors located within previously irradiated volumes. A majority of these patients had inoperable diseases with no distant metastasis. There were 136 male and 84 female patients, and median age was 56 years. All patients had previously received radiation therapy as the primary treatment or adjuvant treatment following surgery, with a median dose of 57.17 cGy (range, 39-74 cGy). The salvage brachytherapy consisted of a low-dose-rate, afterloading Iridium(192) implant, which delivered a median minimum tumor dose of 53 Gy to a mean tumor volume of 68.75 cm(2). Sixty percent of the patients also received interstitial hyperthermia, and 40% received concurrent chemotherapy as a radiosensitizing and potentiating agent.

RESULTS

At a minimum 6-month follow-up, local tumor control was achieved in 77% (217/282) of the implanted tumor sites. The 2, 5, and 10-year disease-free actuarial survival rates for the entire group were 60%, 33%, and 22%, respectively. The overall survival rate for the entire group at 5 years was 21.7%. Moderate to severe late complications occurred in 27% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

It has been estimated that approximately 20-30% of head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy have recurrence within the initial treatment volume. Furthermore, similar percentages of patients who survive after successful irradiation develop new primary tumors of the head and neck or experience metastatic neck disease. A majority of such patients cannot be treated with a repeat course of external beam irradiation because of limited normal tissue tolerance, leading to unacceptable morbidity. However, in a select group of these patients, salvage interstitial brachytherapy may play an important role in providing patients with durable palliation and tumor control, as well as a chance for cure.

Clinical experience with retreatment for palliation

Every radiation oncologist is faced occasionally with the need to consider reirradiation for palliation. Because reirradiation has the potential to exceed normal tissue tolerances, there is a need to have information on the efficacy and toxicity of retreatment. This article reviews the reirradiation literature and provides guidance to clinicians with regard to the risks, benefits, and side effects of retreatment.

Interstitial iridium-192 implantation for recurrent and/or locally advanced head and neck cancer

We report our experience with the use of interstitial iridium-192 implantation in the management of patients with recurrent and locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Between June 1992 and July 1998 this technique was employed in the management of two groups of patients: (1) a primary group, comprising 42 patients who had presented for the first time with advanced head and neck disease, and had therefore not undergone any previous treatment; and (2) a salvage group of 16 patients with recurrent disease previously treated with external beam radiotherapy (four received therapy to the neck, one to the cheek, eight to the tongue and three to the floor of the mouth). The follow-up in each group was short, ranging from 3 to 56 months. The overall response in the primary group was 38/42 (90%). A complete response was achieved in 35/42 (83%). In the salvage group, the overall response was 13/16 (81%); 4/16 (25%) showed a complete response and 9/16 (56%) a partial response. The estimated percentage surviving at 1 year for patients with primary disease is 70% (95% confidence interval (CI) 54-86). For those receiving salvage therapy the estimated percentage surviving at 1 year is 45% (95% CI 19-71).

Brachytherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer

The outlook for patients with recurrent HNC that is not amenable to treatment with curative surgery alone is grim. Reirradiation is often possible and can have a substantial effect on local tumor control. A dose of at least 60 Gy is needed, however, and should preferably be given using BT. Radiobiological considerations dictate the use of small fraction sizes. The role of hyperbaric oxygen in reducing the morbidity associated with reirradiation (by improving the vascularization status of irradiated normal tissue) deserves further investigation. Adequate imaging and recent developments in conformal radiotherapy (3D planning and intensity-modulated radiotherapy) and stereotactic radiotherapy should be utilized in order to apply high tumoricidal doses, while minimizing the incorporated volume of irradiated critical normal tissue.

[Risk factors of late complications after interstitial 192Ir brachytherapy in cancers of the oral cavity]

Brachytherapy has confirmed its prevailing role in conservative treatment of oral cavity carcinomas. To describe late toxicity in long-term surviving patients, comparisons with other series are necessary. Study of series of patients implanted for floor of the mouth or mobile tongue shows the need for more detailed data. Dental prophylaxy and lead protection of the mandibule, good indications and techniques of brachytherapy are necessary to avoid late complications. Some treatment factors have proved to be of good prognosis for late complications through multivariate analysis of large series treated with lr 192 wires, using the Paris system, eg, dose rate lower than 0.5 or 0.7 Gy/h, intersource spacing smaller than 1.2 or 1.5 cm, treated surface less than 12 cm2, lineic activity less than 1.5 mCi/cm, less than 1 cm diameter hyperdose, and use of mandibular lead protections. Tumor volume and location to the floor of mouth lead to higher risk of complications. Knowledge of treatment-related factors is important, with the development of new afterloading projectors allowing to control the dose rate and correct small inhomogeneities. High-dose rate exclusive brachytherapy is not recommended. More precise and reproducible classification should be used to report complications in series leading to publications in the future, thus allowing to compare results, reduce complication rates and improve the quality of life.

Wound complications associated with brachytherapy for primary or salvage treatment of head and neck cancer

Brachytherapy can be employed in the primary or salvage treatment of head and neck cancer. The advantage of brachytherapy is the stereotactic limitation of radiation exposure to noninvolved tissues. Wound complications associated with brachytherapy have been discussed only sporadically in the literature. This retrospective study examines 28 patients, 20 for initial treatment and eight for salvage, with varying site and stage head and neck cancer treated with brachytherapy in addition to external beam radiation therapy and/or surgery. The overall complication rate was 50% (14/28), with infection and minor flap breakdown being the most common problems. Tumor site in the primary treatment group was the only significant factor in wound complications. In the salvage group complications were minor and primarily related to flap coverage of brachytherapy catheters.

[Salvage therapy of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the mouth cavity and oropharynx. Results of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with ablative tumor surgery]

PURPOSE

The clinical effect of high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy combined with tumor resection was investigated in this retrospective study on patients with recurrent oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in 38 patients were treated over a period of 7 years (1988-1994) by HDR interstitial brachytherapy using Gammamed 12i equipment. Pretreatment of patients in terms of irradiation and surgery differed (33 irradiated with a total dose between 60.0 and 75.6 Gy, including 8 patients with additional surgery; 1 patient with surgery alone, and 4 patients without any pretreatment). Indications for interstitial brachytherapy differed according to individual responses to treatment and medical histories.

RESULTS

Interstitial brachytherapy was successful in the majority of patients, i.e. complete remission: 12, partial remission: 19, no change: 2, progression: 5. Local control and overall survival including patients with surgical treatment was 59% and 81% at 6 months and 47% and 49% after 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Interstitial HDR brachytherapy with Iridium 192 is recommended in patients with local recurrences or second primary carcinomas after previous external radiotherapy in the head and neck region. Combination of interstitial brachytherapy and surgery is preferable for these patients.

Salvage brachytherapy of posterior pharyngeal wall squamous cell carcinoma in a previously irradiated area

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy performed in patients with posterior pharyngeal wall carcinoma in a previously irradiated area is evaluated in terms of local control, survival, and complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1982 and July 1993, 14 patients were treated with interstitial low dose rate brachytherapy alone for posterior pharyngeal wall squamous cell carcinoma in a previously irradiated area (local recurrences in five cases and second tumors in nine cases). Tumor size ranged from 1 to 4 cm. No patient had a macroscopic nodal involvement or metastase at the time of diagnosis. Median dose delivered was 55 Gy (39 to 60 Gy).

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were assessed for local control. Twelve of them achieved complete macroscopic response within 2 months after brachytherapy. Local relapse occurred in five patients, from 5 to 29 months after brachytherapy. One patient developed distant metastatis without loco-regional relapse. Disease free survival was 69, 59, and 37% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively; overall survival was 78, 50, and 21% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Three patients were still alive without recurrence (8, 8, and 10 years after treatment). We did not observe any severe acute or delayed toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, interstitial brachytherapy should be considered as a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with posterior pharyngeal wall squamous cell carcinoma in a previously irradiated area. There are no reports in the literature on this subject.