Conformal prostate brachytherapy: initial experience of a phase I/II dose-escalating trial

High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer using three different doses - 14 years of single-centre experience

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC) treated with 3D conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as monotherapy.

Material and methods

From March 2004 to November 2017, 277 men with LPC underwent 3D conformal HDR-BT as monotherapy, with a temporary implant. The dose prescription was: 38 Gy in 4 fractions (149 patients), 27 Gy in 2 fractions (41 patients), and 19-20 Gy in a single fraction (87 patients). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity assessment were performed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

Results

The mean age was 67 (range, 47-81) years. Overall, 145 patients were low-risk, 116 intermediate-risk, and 16 high-risk prostate cancer. After a median follow-up of six years (range, 6-160 months), bPFS, PFS, and CSS were 81%, 96%, and 97%, respectively. Dose prescription, initial prostate specific antigen (iPSA) ≥ 9,5 ng/ml, and high-risk disease resulted in prognostic factors regarding bPFS. Only G2-G3 acute or late GI and GU toxicities were observed.

Conclusions

HDR-BT as monotherapy is a valid and safe treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. After a long follow-up, patients receiving 19-20 Gy in a single fraction had a lower biochemical control rate compared to patients receiving 38 Gy in 4 fractions or 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Randomized prospective trials with a longer follow-up are necessary to confirm our results, and define total doses and dose per fraction for HDR-BT in patients with LPC.

The current state of randomized clinical trial evidence for prostate brachytherapy

Interstitial brachytherapy is one of several curative therapeutic options for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In this review, we summarize all available randomized data to support the optimal use of prostate brachytherapy. Evidence from completed randomized controlled trials is the focus of this review with a presentation also of important ongoing trials. Gaps in knowledge are identified where future investigation may be fruitful with intent to inspire well-designed prospective studies with standardized treatment that focuses on improving oncological outcomes, reducing morbidity, or maintaining quality of life.

Sexual function and male cancer

Quality of life in general and sexual functioning in particular have become very important in cancer patients. Biological factors such as anatomic alterations, physiological changes and secondary effect of medical interventions may preclude normal sexual functioning even when sexual desire is intact. In spite of modern surgical techniques, improved chemotherapeutical drugs and sophisticated radiation techniques, still many patients complain of impaired sexual function after cancer treatment. A large number of instruments already exist to assess quality of life in cancer patients. It is important to standardize procedures and to use validated questionnaires. Collecting data on an ongoing basis before and long after treatment is mandatory, and control groups must be used. Patients should be offered sexual counselling and informed about the availability of therapies for sexual dysfunctions. In this paper we review the topic of sexual functioning after treatment (predominantly after radiotherapy) of the most common malignancies in men and give suggestions for treatment.

High dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Standard of care and future direction

High dose rate brachytherapy is a highly conformal method of radiation dose escalation for prostate cancer and one of several treatment options for men with localised disease. The large doses per fraction exploit the low alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer cells so that biological radiation dose delivered is substantially greater than that achieved with conventional external beam delivery. This review article presents contemporary data on the rationale for high dose rate brachytherapy including treatment technique and future directions.

Review of advanced catheter technologies in radiation oncology brachytherapy procedures

The development of new catheter and applicator technologies in recent years has significantly improved treatment accuracy, efficiency, and outcomes in brachytherapy. In this paper, we review these advances, focusing on the performance of catheter imaging and reconstruction techniques in brachytherapy procedures using magnetic resonance images and electromagnetic tracking. The accuracy of catheter reconstruction, imaging artifacts, and other notable properties of plastic and titanium applicators in gynecologic treatments are reviewed. The accuracy, noise performance, and limitations of electromagnetic tracking for catheter reconstruction are discussed. Several newly developed applicators for accelerated partial breast irradiation and gynecologic treatments are also reviewed. New hypofractionated high dose rate treatment schemes in prostate cancer and accelerated partial breast irradiation are presented.

Dose-Escalated Robotic SBRT for Stage I-II Prostate Cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the precise external delivery of very high-dose radiotherapy to targets in the body, with treatment completed in one to five fractions. SBRT should be an ideal approach for organ-confined prostate cancer because (I) dose-escalation should yield improved rates of cancer control; (II) the unique radiobiology of prostate cancer favors hypofractionation; and (III) the conformal nature of SBRT minimizes high-dose radiation delivery to immediately adjacent organs, potentially reducing complications. This approach is also more convenient for patients, and is cheaper than intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Several external beam platforms are capable of delivering SBRT for early-stage prostate cancer, although most of the mature reported series have employed a robotic non-coplanar platform (i.e., CyberKnife). Several large studies report 5-year biochemical relapse rates which compare favorably to IMRT. Rates of late GU toxicity are similar to those seen with IMRT, and rates of late rectal toxicity may be less than with IMRT and low-dose rate brachytherapy. Patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes appear similar to IMRT in the urinary domain. Bowel QOL may be less adversely affected by SBRT than with other radiation modalities. After 5 years of follow-up, SBRT delivered on a robotic platform is yielding outcomes at least as favorable as IMRT, and may be considered appropriate therapy for stage I–II prostate cancer.

Future directions from past experience: a century of prostate radiotherapy

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed noncutaneous malignancy in men, yet 100 years ago it was considered a rare disease. Over the past century, radiation therapy has evolved from a radium source placed in the urethra to today's advanced proton therapy delivered by only a few specialized centers. As techniques in radiation have evolved, the treatment of localized prostate cancer has become one of the most debated topics in oncology. Today, patients with prostate cancer must often make a difficult decision between multiple treatment modalities, each with the risk of permanent sequelae, without robust randomized data to compare every treatment option. Meanwhile, opinions of urologists and radiation oncologists about the risks and benefits involved with each modality vary widely. Further complicating the issue is rapidly advancing technology which often outpaces clinical data. This article represents a complete description of the evolution of prostate cancer radiation therapy with the goal of illuminating the historical basis for current challenges facing oncologists and their patients.

Phase I/II trial of single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy-boosted hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

A Phase I/II protocol was conducted to examine the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a single-fraction high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy implant.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2001 through 2006, 26 consecutive patients were treated on the trial. The primary objective was to demonstrate a high rate of completion without experiencing a treatment-limiting toxicity. Eligibility was limited to patients with T stage ≤2b, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤20, and Gleason score ≤7. Treatment began with a single HDR fraction of 6Gy to the entire prostate and 9Gy to the peripheral zone, followed by IMRT optimized to deliver in 28 fractions with a normalized total dose of 70Gy. Patients received 50.4Gy to the pelvic lymph node. The prostate dose (IMRT and HDR) resulted in an average biologic equivalent dose >128Gy (α/β=3). Patients whose pretreatment PSA was ≥10ng/mL, Gleason score 7, or stage ≥T2b received short-term androgen ablation.

RESULTS

Median followup was 53 months (9-68 months). There were no biochemical failures by either the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology or the Phoenix definitions. The median nadir PSA was 0.32ng/mL. All the 26 patients completed the treatment as prescribed. The rate of Grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity was 3.8% consisting of a urethral stricture. There was no other Grade 3 or 4 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-fraction HDR-boosted IMRT is a safe effective method of dose escalation for localized prostate cancer.

High-dose-rate monotherapy: safe and effective brachytherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy used as the only treatment (monotherapy) for early prostate cancer is consistent with current concepts in prostate radiobiology, and the dose is reliably delivered in a prospectively defined anatomic distribution that meets all the requirements for safe and effective therapy. We report the disease control and toxicity of HDR monotherapy from California Endocurietherapy (CET) and William Beaumont Hospital (WBH) in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

There were 298 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HDR monotherapy between 1996 and 2005. Two biologically equivalent hypofractionation protocols were used. At CET the dose was 42 Gy in six fractions (two implantations 1 week apart) delivered to a computed tomography-defined planning treatment volume. At WBH the dose was 38 Gy in four fractions (one implantation) based on intraoperative transrectal ultrasound real-time treatment planning. The bladder, urethral, and rectal dose constraints were similar. Toxicity was scored with the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 5.2 years. The median age of the patients was 63 years, and the median value of the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was 6.0 ng/mL. The 8-year results were 99% local control, 97% biochemical control (nadir +2), 99% distant metastasis-free survival, 99% cause-specific survival, and 95% overall survival. Toxicity was scored per event, meaning that an individual patient with more than one symptom was represented repeatedly in the morbidity data table. Genitourinary toxicity consisted of 10% transient Grade 2 urinary frequency or urgency and 3% Grade 3 episode of urinary retention. Gastrointestinal toxicity was <1%.

CONCLUSIONS

High disease control rates and low morbidity demonstrate that HDR monotherapy is safe and effective for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Phase II trial of combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: preliminary results of RTOG 0321

PURPOSE

To estimate the rate of late Grade 3 or greater genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) after treatment with external beam radiotherapy and prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Each participating institution submitted computed tomography-based HDR brachytherapy dosimetry data electronically for credentialing and for each study patient. Patients with locally confined Stage T1c-T3b prostate cancer were eligible for the present study. All patients were treated with 45 Gy in 25 fractions using external beam radiotherapy and one HDR implant delivering 19 Gy in two fractions. All AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Late GU/GI AEs were defined as those occurring >9 months from the start of the protocol treatment, in patients with ≥18 months of potential follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients from 14 institutions were enrolled in the present study. Of the 129 patients, 125 were eligible, and AE data were available for 112 patients at analysis. The pretreatment characteristics of the patients were as follows: Stage T1c-T2c, 91%; Stage T3a-T3b, 9%; prostate-specific antigen level ≤10 ng/mL, 70%; prostate-specific antigen level >10 but ≤20 ng/mL, 30%; and Gleason score 2-6, 10%; Gleason score 7, 72%; and Gleason score 8-10, 18%. At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, three acute and four late Grade 3 GU/GI AEs were reported. The estimated rate of late Grade 3-5 GU and GI AEs at 18 months was 2.56%.

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective, multi-institutional trial of computed tomography-based HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy. The technique and doses used in the present study resulted in acceptable levels of AEs.

An in vivo investigative protocol for HDR prostate brachytherapy using urethral and rectal thermoluminescence dosimetry

PURPOSE

To develop an in vivo dosimetry based investigative action level relevant for a corrective protocol for HDR brachytherapy boost treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The dose delivered to points within the urethra and rectum was measured using TLD in vivo dosimetry in 56 patients. Comparisons between the urethral and rectal measurements and TPS calculations showed differences, which are related to the relative position of the implant and TLD trains, and allowed shifts of implant position relative to the prostate to be estimated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of rectal dose measurements is consistent with implant movement, which was previously only identified with the urethral data. Shift corrected doses were compared with results from the TPS. Comparison of peak doses to the urethra and rectum has been assessed against the proposed corrective protocol to limit overdosing these critical structures. An initial investigative level of 20% difference between measured and TPS peak dose was established, which corresponds to 1/3 of patients which was practical for the caseload. These patients were assessed resulting in corrective action being applied for one patient. Multiple triggering for selective investigative action is outlined. The use of a single in vivo measurement in the first fraction optimizes patient benefit at acceptable cost.

Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with intensity modulated brachytherapy or EBRT for prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

Rectal toxicity remains a serious complication affecting quality of life for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. We began an investigational trial injecting hyaluronic acid (HA) in the perirectal fat to increase the distance between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall. This is the first report using HA injection in oncology.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a trial of external beam radiation therapy with HDR brachytherapy boosts in prostate cancer. During the two high-dose-rate (HDR) fractions, thermoluminescent dosimeter dosimeters were placed in the urethra and in the rectum. Before the second HDR fraction, 3-7 mL (mean, 6 mL) of HA was injected under transrectal ultrasound guidance in the perirectal fat to systematically create a 1.5-cm space. Urethral and rectal HDR doses were calculated and measured. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the stability of the new space.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled in the study. No toxicity was produced from the HA or the injection. In follow-up computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, the HA injection did not migrate or change in mass/shape for close to 1 year. The mean distance between rectum and prostate was 2.0 cm along the entire length of the prostate. The median measured rectal dose, when normalized to the median urethral dose, demonstrated a decrease in dose from 47.1% to 39.2% (p < 0.001) with or without injection. For an HDR boost dose of 1150 cGy, the rectum mean Dmax reduction was from 708 cGy to 507 cGy, p < 0.001, and the rectum mean Dmean drop was from 608 to 442 cGy, p < 0.001 post-HA injection.

CONCLUSION

The new 2-cm distance derived from the HA injection significantly decreased rectal dose in HDR brachytherapy. Because of the several-month duration of stability, the same distance was maintained during the course of external beam radiation therapy.

Unification of a common biochemical failure definition for prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation

PURPOSE

Minimal data are available regarding selection of an optimal biochemical failure (BF) definition for patients treated with brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and combinations of these treatments with or without androgen deprivation (AD). We retrospectively analyzed our institution's experience treating localized prostate cancer in an attempt to determine a BF definition that could be applied for these various treatment modalities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 2376 patients with clinical stage T1-T3 N0 M0 prostate cancer were treated with conventional dose (median, 66.6 Gy) EBRT (n = 1201), high-dose (median, 75.6 Gy) adaptive radiation therapy (n = 465), EBRT + high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (n = 416), or brachytherapy alone (n = 294) between 1987 and 2003. A total of 496 patients (21%) received neoadjuvant AD with radiation therapy. There were 21924 posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements. Multiple BF definitions were tested for their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (+PV), and negative PV (-PV) in predicting subsequent clinical failure (CF) (any local failure or distant metastasis), overall survival (OS), and cause-specific survival (CSS). Median follow-up was 4.5 years. The date of BF was the date BF criteria were met (e.g., date of third rise).

RESULTS

A total of 290 patients (12%) experienced CF at a median interval of 3.6 years (range, 0.2-15.2 years). The 5- and 10-year CF rates were 12% and 26%, respectively. Three consecutive rises yielded a 46% sensitivity and 84% specificity for predicting CF. The 10-year CF for those 475 patients who experienced three rises (BF) was 37% vs. 17% for those patients who did not meet these criteria (biochemically controlled [BC]). For all patients, the following definitions were superior to three rises for predicting CF for both +PV, and -PV: n + 1 (> or =1 ng/mL above nadir), n + 2, n + 3, threshold 2 (any PSA > or =2.0 ng/mL at or after nadir), threshold 3, threshold 4, and threshold 5. For the subset of patients treated with EBRT alone, the n + k definitions and threshold k definitions maintained superior predictive capacity. However, the threshold k definitions seemed to maintain a slightly greater separation in 10-year CF rates (43% for BF vs. 13% for BC = 30% difference for threshold 3). Surprisingly, all definitions generally had better predictive capacity for those patients who received brachytherapy or neoadjuvant AD vs. EBRT alone. The endpoints appeared similar for n + 1 vs. threshold 3 and n + 2 vs. threshold 4 in EBRT alone patients, but for brachytherapy or neoadjuvant AD patients, there were similarities for n + 2 vs. threshold 3 and n + 3 vs. threshold 4. This may be a reflection of the lower nadir levels in patients receiving AD (median <0.1 ng/mL vs. 0.2 ng/mL for brachytherapy vs. 0.8 ng/mL for EBRT alone, p < 0.01). When examining CF correlation for the various classes of BF definitions, the threshold k definitions clearly demonstrated the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, followed by the n + k definitions. For OS, the threshold k definitions again demonstrated the greatest area under the curve, followed by definitions based on specific nadir cutoffs (nadir > or =k ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical failure definitions applying a PSA threshold at or after the nadir (e.g., threshold 3) demonstrated the highest association with CF, OS, and CSS for all assessed treatment modalities. Definitions incorporating a PSA increase above the nadir value (e.g., nadir + 2 ng/mL) were also superior for all modalities. In general, BF definitions have greater predictive capacity for clinical outcome with brachytherapy or neoadjuvant AD than EBRT alone, possibly because of less "noise" from production of background PSA.

Interfractional fluctuation of rectal dose in high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to explore the cause of the difference in the maximal rectal dose between the first and second high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy applications by comparing the thickness of the anterior rectal wall.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The rectal dose and the thickness of the anterior rectal wall were analyzed in 26 patients with prostate cancer. After undergoing external beam radiation treatment with a total isocenter dose of 50 Gy, they were treated with HDR brachytherapy of 7.5 Gy/fraction, two fractions daily. The interval between the first HDR brachytherapy session and the second was 5 h. The rectal doses were directly surveyed during irradiation of the HDR brachytherapy. Thickening of the anterior rectal wall was measured at the same level by axial computed tomography scans obtained before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications.

RESULTS

The maximal surveyed rectal doses during the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications were 188 +/- 51 cGy and 220 +/- 35 cGy, respectively (P < 0.01). The fluctuation ratio exceeded 1 in each case. The thickness of the anterior rectal wall before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications was 18.78 +/- 4.34 mm and 14.95 +/- 4.09 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The fluctuation difference exceeded 0 in each case.

CONCLUSION

The different rectal dose is attributable to thinning of the anterior rectal wall. The total rectal dose is within the range of doses at risk of exerting a toxic effect on the rectum.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy without external beam irradiation for locally advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) had been used only in combination with external beam irradiation (EBI) until our previously reported first trial of HDR-BT alone without EBI. The purpose of the current report is to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of this regimen, with more patient accrual and longer follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1995 through 2004, 111 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with HDR-BT without EBI. Fifteen patients were considered as low-risk, 28 as intermediate-risk, and 68 as high-risk. The prescribed dose was 48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days or 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days. Median follow-up time was 27 months (range 5-119).

RESULTS

All the patients completed the treatment regimen. The 3- and 5-year PSA failure-free rates were 83% and 70%, and the local control rates 100% and 97%. The maximum toxicities observed were Grade 3 by CTCAE v3.0 (6 acute, 1 chronic).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-BT without EBI was feasible and its toxicity acceptable. Short-term tumor control was promising, even for locally advanced cases. More patient accrual and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the efficacy of this novel approach.

Braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose no tratamento do carcinoma da próstata: análise da toxicidade aguda e do comportamento bioquímico

OBJETIVO: Analisar a resposta bioquímica nas variáveis volume prostático, valor do antígeno prostático específico (PSA), escores de Gleason, estádio, risco da doença e hormonioterapia. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: No período de fevereiro de 1998 a julho de 2001, 46 pacientes com câncer de próstata foram tratados com radioterapia, numa combinação de teleterapia e braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose (BATD). A idade variou de 51 a 79 anos (média de 66,4 anos). O estádio T1c foi o mais freqüente: 30 (65%). O escore de Gleason era abaixo de 7 em 78% dos pacientes. O PSA variou de 3,4 a 33,3, estando abaixo de 10 em 39% das vezes. O volume prostático médio foi de 32,3 cc. Um total de 28% dos pacientes recebeu hormonioterapia. A dose de teleterapia variou de 45 a 50,4 Gy, associada a quatro frações de BATD de 4 Gy. RESULTADOS: O seguimento variou de 6 a 43 meses. Quatro pacientes perderam seguimento e quatro morreram (um por doença). Dos 39 pacientes analisados, 76% apresentaram PSA menor que 1,5. Nenhuma das variáveis analisadas foi estatisticamente significante (p > 0,05) com relação ao controle bioquímico. CONCLUSÃO: A utilização de BATD foi eficiente no tratamento do câncer de próstata e, neste estudo, as variáveis consideradas como fatores prognósticos não interferiram no controle bioquímico.

Quality assurance of HDR prostate plans: Program implementation at a community hospital

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is currently the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States, and the second leading cause of cancer mortality. The utilization of radiation therapy is regarded as the definitive local therapy of choice for intermediate- and high-risk disease, in which there is increased risk for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or regional node involvement. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a logical treatment modality to deliver the boost dose to an external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment to increase local control rates. From a treatment perspective, the utilization of a complicated treatment delivery system, the compressed time frame in which the procedure is performed, and the small number of large dose fractions make the implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program imperative. One aspect of this program is the QA of the HDR treatment plan. Review of regulatory and medical physics professional publications shows that substantial general guidance is available. We provide some insight to the implementation of an HDR prostate plan program at a community hospital. One aspect addressed is the utilization of the low-dose-rate (LDR) planning system and the use of existing ultrasound image sets to familiarize the radiation therapy team with respect to acceptable HDR implant geometries. Additionally, the use of the LDR treatment planning system provided a means to prospectively determine the relationship between the treated isodose volume and the product of activity and time for the department's planning protocol prior to the first HDR implant. For the first 12 HDR prostate implants, the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation was 3.05% between the predicted product of activity and time vs. the actual plan values. Retrospective re-evaluation of the actual implant data reduced the RMS deviation to 2.36%.

High dose brachytherapy (real time) in patients with intermediate-or high-risk prostate cancer: technical description and preliminary experience

INTRODUCTION

It has been well documented that the outcome of prostate cancer treatment depends on the dose administered. Hence, techniques have been developed that allow high-dose administration without increasing the complications, e.g. external radiotherapy combined with high-dose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy. In this article we analyse the technique and protocol of real-time HDR brachytherapy together with the preliminary results that support its use. Materials and methods. Between June 1998 and December 2004, 100 patients with adenoma of the prostate were treated with 46 Gy of external irradiation to the pelvis and 2 HDR brachytherapy fractions (each of 1150 cGy) at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of a 5-week radiotherapy course. The 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) system was used to establish disease stage. Patients with intermediate-risk (PSA 10-20 ng/ml or Gleason = 7 or T2c) and high-risk (two intermediate risk factors or PSA > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 7 or > T2c) without metastases were eligible for the brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus panel statement. SPSS statistical package was used to quantify survival (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicity was scored according to RTOG guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 49-78). Clinical stage was T2a in 22% of the patients, 26% T2b and 52% T3. Initial PSA was = 10 ng/ml in 22% of the patients and > 10 ng/ml in 78%. Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 12-79). The 5-year overall survival and actuarial biochemical control were 99% and 87% respectively. No chronic severe complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The good results of local control, disease-free survival and few complications that the external radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy have shown suggest that the method should be considered as first-choice in the treatment of prostate tumours of high- and intermediate-risk.

GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to present the GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations for template and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided transperineal temporary interstitial prostate brachytherapy using a high dose rate iridium-192 stepping source and a remote afterloading technique. Experts in prostate brachytherapy developed these recommendations on behalf of the GEC/ESTRO and of the EAU. The paper has been approved by both GEC/ESTRO steering committee members and EAU committee members.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to organ confined prostate cancer can be applied as a boost treatment in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) using a proper number of BT fractions in curative intent. Temporary transperineal BT alone or in combination with EBRT are feasible as a palliative/salvage treatment modality because of local recurrence, however, without large clinical experience. The use of temporary BT as a monotherapy is subject of ongoing clinical research.

RESULTS

Recommendations for pre-treatment investigations, patient selection, equipment and facilities, the clinical team, the implant procedure (treatment planning and needle implantation) dose and fractionation, reporting, management of side effects and follow-up are given.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are intended to be technically and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for the medical decision rests with the treating physician. Although, this paper represents the consensus of an interdisciplinary group of experts, TRUS and template guided temporary transperineal interstitial implants in prostate cancer are a constantly evolving field and the recommendations are subject to modifications as new data become available.

Vessel-sparing prostate radiotherapy: Dose limitation to critical erectile vascular structures (internal pudendal artery and corpus cavernosum) defined by MRI

PURPOSE

Most evidence suggests that impotence after prostate radiation therapy has a vascular etiology. The corpus cavernosum (CC) and the internal pudendal artery (IPA) are the critical vascular structures related to erectile function. This study suggests that it is feasible to markedly decrease radiation dose to the CC and the IPA and directly determine the impact of dose limitation on potency.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five patients (10 external beam, 15 brachytherapy) underwent MRI/CT-based treatment planning for prostate cancer. In addition, 10 patients entered on the vessel-sparing protocol underwent a time-of-flight MRI angiography sequence to define the IPA. The distance from the MRI-defined prostate apex to the penile bulb (PB), CC, and IPA was measured and compared to the distance from the CT-defined apex. Doses (D5 and D50) to the PB, CC, and IPA were determined for an 80 Gy external beam course. In 5 patients, CT plans were generated and compared to MRI-based plans.

RESULTS

The combination of coronal, sagittal, and axial MRI data sets allowed superior definition of the prostate apex and its relationship to critical vascular structures. The apex to PB distance averaged 1.45 cm (0.36 standard deviation) with a range of 0.7 cm to 2.1 cm. Peak dose (D5) to the proximal CC in the MRI-planned 80 Gy course was 26 (9) Gy (0.36 of CT-planned dose), and peak dose to the IPA was 39 (13) Gy (0.61 of CT-planned dose).

CONCLUSION

The distance between the prostate apex and critical vascular structures is highly variable. Current empiric rules for CT contouring (apex 1.5 cm above PB) overestimate or underestimate the distance between the prostate apex and critical vascular structures. When defined by MRI T2 and MRI angiogram with CT registration, limitation of dose to critical erectile structures is possible, with a more significant gain than has been previously reported using dose limitation by commonly applied intensity modulated radiation therapy studies based on CT imaging. These techniques make "vessel-sparing" prostate radiotherapy feasible.

Combined modality treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective review of our experience using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During the study period, we recommended external beam radiotherapy (45 Gy) and HDR boost (18 Gy in three fractions) combined with hormonal therapy (HT) for 2 months before and during radiotherapy to patients with at least one of the following risk features: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen>10, Gleason score (GS)>or=7, and clinical T3 disease. Additional HT for 2 years after radiotherapy was recommended for patients with GS>7. To patients whose risk of positive nodes exceeded 15%, we recommended whole pelvic radiotherapy. We administered HDR via single implant, and all fractions were given within 24h.

RESULTS

This report is based on our initial 64 patients treated with HDR boost. The median follow-up was 50 months (range 25-68 months). The 4-year estimates of overall and disease-free survival were 98% and 92%, respectively. One patient experienced late grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy is an effective means of delivering conformal prostate radiotherapy, and may be used with whole pelvic radiotherapy and HT.

Clinical results of combined treatment conformal high-dose-rate iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy using staging lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To report the first long-term biochemical control rate of patients treated with two protocols using a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in Japan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1997 and July 2001, 71 patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma were treated with a combination of EBRT and HDR brachytherapy. Patient age ranged from 58 to 81 years (mean 70.5). Of the 71 patients, 12, 41, and 18 had Stage T1c, T2, and T3, respectively, according to the International Union Against Cancer classification system (1997). The mean initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 24.2 ng/mL (median, 11.9 ng/mL); 30% of the patients had an initial PSA level >20 ng/mL. Of the 71 patients, 31 had received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Hormonal therapy before treatment was stopped at the beginning of RT in all cases. Patients in this series were treated on two protocols. In the initial protocol, patients were treated with whole pelvis EBRT to 45.0 Gy in 25 fractions and three HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (35 patients). In the second protocol, patients were treated with prostatic EBRT to 41.8 Gy in 19 fractions, with an added staging lymphadenectomy to rule out lymph node metastasis for patients with high-risk factors, and four HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (36 patients). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition for biochemical failure was used. Acute and chronic toxicities were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 65 months (median, 44 months).

RESULTS

Of the 71 patients, 69 were alive at the last follow-up. Two patients had died of hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer at 3.5 and 4.0 years after treatment with no biochemical failure. Sixty-six patients (93%), including the two who had died of intercurrent disease, showed a tendency for a PSA decline after treatment and had no biochemical or clinical evidence of disease at the last follow-up visit. Sixty patients (85%) achieved PSA nadir levels of < or =1.0 ng/mL. The biochemical/clinical failure-free control rate at 3 and at 5 years was 93% and 93%, respectively. The bladder and rectal complications were minimal.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high frequency of high-risk patients in the present patient population, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 93% at 5 years. Acute and chronic toxicity with this method was acceptable. Additional long-term follow-up is required to assess this treatment, because the median survival is not likely to be reached for several years.

Analysis of serial CT scans to assess template and catheter movement in prostate HDR brachytherapy

PURPOSE

As prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy becomes more prevalent, varying amounts of catheter displacement have been noted. To investigate the constancy of catheter position and its impact on dose distribution, we analyzed serial dosimetric CT scans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The data from 50 patients were analyzed. During initial CT treatment planning, transverse images of the implant volume were collected, and all structures were digitized into the Nucletron Brachytherapy Planning System. Digitally reconstructed radiographs were generated with rendering of the catheter tips, ischial tuberosity, and perineal template. The distance from each catheter tip to the template and to the ischial tuberosity was measured. The distance between the ischial tuberosity and the template was similarly measured. A second CT set was obtained at different intervals and compared with the first measurement to assess catheter and/or template movement. In 10 patients, the second CT set was obtained before the third fraction in both 2-mm and 5-mm slice sequences, and the latter was used to re-create the HDR plan.

RESULTS

Although no interfraction catheter movement relative to the template was found, the template-catheter unit moved in a caudal direction between HDR fractions. The amount of displacement was time dependent: 2 mm before the second fraction, 8 mm before the third, and 10 mm before the fourth. When comparing the first HDR treatment with the third, median decreases in the following dosimetric parameters were noted: dose to 90% of the prostate volume, 35% (r = 0-60); minimal dose to the base, 35% (r = 17-65); and maximal dose to 1 cm(3), 13% (r = 3-19%).

CONCLUSION

The interstitial catheters did not slip within the template and were not caudally displaced independently but rather in conjunction with the template. The displacement occurred in a time-dependent fashion, and, without redress, significant dosimetric changes are encountered by the third fraction.

High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions

Fractionated high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer requires a robust means of catheter fixation with good quality assurance. Catheter position and dosimetry has been formally evaluated in 20 consecutive patients representing a total of 332 catheters undergoing two HDR afterloading brachytherapy fractions over 36 h. The mean interfraction movement of catheters as measured by external length was less than 1 mm, but within the prostate on consecutive CT scans there was a mean interfraction movement of 11.5 mm away from the prostate base. This has a significant impact on implant dosimetry as measured by D90 and the COIN index, unless corrected by repositioning the catheters.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis with special focus on tolerance and chronic toxicity

PURPOSE

To examine retrospectively fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer with special focus on tolerance and toxicity, especially chronic toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 1995 and October 2001, 43 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy without external beam irradiation at Osaka University Hospital. The stage was T1, T2, T3, and T4 in 8, 14, 18, and 3 patients, respectively. The adenocarcinoma was well, moderately, or poorly differentiated in 12, 16, and 15 patients, respectively. The median initial prostate-specific antigen level was 19.3 ng/mL (range 3.8-233.0). Thirty-eight patients also received hormonal therapy. Metallic needles were implanted transperineally under real-time ultrasound guidance, followed by a dose optimization program. Patients were irradiated twice daily at intervals of >6 h. A total dose of 54 Gy in nine fractions within 5 days (48 Gy in eight fractions within 5 days for the first 7 cases) was administered in one implant session. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 1-76).

RESULTS

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicity of Grade 4, 2, and 1 occurred in 1 (2%), 12 (28%), and 8 (19%) patients, respectively. Five patients had late toxicity: one with rectal ulcer (Grade 2) and four with rectal bleeding (Grade 1). The volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose showed significant correlations with the incidence of acute and chronic toxicities (p = 0.005 and p = 0.014, respectively). The 3-year actuarial overall survival, local control, and biochemical no evidence of disease rate was 94%, 100%, and 55%, respectively. The crude biochemical control rate for low, intermediate, and high-risk patients was 100% (5 of 5), 80% (8 of 10), and 61% (17 of 28), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy was found to be feasible and well tolerated. It showed a low chronic toxicity rate without any event of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group of Grade 3 or greater.

Fractionated perineal high-dose-rate temporary brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: is lymph node sampling necessary?

PURPOSE

To study the influence of imaging based nodal staging and local dose escalation by a high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost in the treatment of locally confined prostate cancer in terms of prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence-free survival (biochemical non-evidence of disease (bNED)), treatment toxicity and prognostic variables.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The prospectively recorded files of 144 men aged in a median of 68 years with a mean follow-up of 8 years (60-171 months) receiving curatively intended, transrectal ultrasound guided high-dose-rate 192-iridium-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for locally confined prostate cancer were analyzed. T-stages were defined by digital rectal investigation and transrectal sonography (TRUS), nodal staging was performed with computed tomography(CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (UICC/AJCR 1992). Twenty-nine patients (20.1%) had T1b-T2a tumors, and 115 patients had T2b-T3 tumors. Median initial PSA (iPSA) was 12.15 ng x mL(-1) (mean 25.61 ng x mL(-1)). The total planned dose applied by external beam radiation was 50 Gy in the pelvis, and 40 Gy in the prostate by in-field-dose modification by individual compensators. The perineal, TRUS guided HDR-BT was delivered in two fractions of 15 Gy each. The target of BT boost was the peripheral zone of the prostate.

RESULTS

The overall survival was 71.5% and that of the disease free survival 82.6%. Freedom from distant metastases in T3 stage was 91.3%, whereas for G3 lesions, it was 88.23%. The bNED rate was 72.9%. Regarding treatment related late toxicity according to the EORTC/RTOG score, we observed grade 1, 2, 3 proctitis in 9.72%, 6.94%, 4.10% as well as grade 1, 2, 3 cystitis in 12.5%, 4.16%, 2.08%, respectively. Grade 4 and 5 proctitis or cystitis were not registered.

CONCLUSION

The minimum 5-year and mean 8-year results confirm that local dose escalation by TRUS guided perineal HDR-BT and complementary external beam radiation of the pelvic lymphatics has curative potential in men with locally confined high-risk prostate cancer, although surgical staging results in the literature suggest a high probabilityof microscopic nodal involvements at the level of 25.61 ng x mL(-1) mean PSA. The influence of additional short-term (< 6 months) hormonal ablation on the treatment results could not be stated.

High-dose-rate stereotactic brachytherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiformes

PURPOSE

To evaluate high-dose-rate (HDR) stereotactic brachytherapy (STBT) for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 1994 and December 1998, 28 patients with newly diagnosed GBM underwent surgery, external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and HDR STBT. STBT eligibility criteria included unifocal lesions, residual tumor < or = 6 cm in maximum diameter, supratentorial lesions, tumors not crossing the midline, tumors without subependymal spread and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 60. STBT was delivered over five consecutive days with two fractions per day for a total median dose of 30 Gy. Twenty-eight STBT eligible GBM patients treated with surgery and EBRT only over the same period were matched controls.

RESULTS

Median survival times for the STBT group and controls were 19.5 versus 12.5 months; one and two year survival rates were 89% versus 42% and 61% versus 28%, respectively (p = 0.12). Using multivariate analysis, age, KPS and HDR STBT were significant factors predicting survival. By RPA class, 2-year survival rates for STBT and controls were: III--78% versus 50%; IV--40% versus 0%; V--21% versus 15%, respectively. Corresponding median survival times in months were: 41.6 versus 21.2 (p = 0.39); 16.7 versus 12.1 (p = 0.36); 18.7 versus 10.6 (p = 0.02). No major complications were found in the STBT arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of small patient numbers, median survival time increases were only statistically significant in the RPA Class V patients, but a strong survival time trend emerged favoring patients undergoing HDR STBT. Further prospective study is warranted to fully assess the merits of this technique for GBM management.

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

PURPOSE

When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason <or=6, and clinical stage <or=T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA >or=10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason >or=7, or clinical T stage >or=T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV.

Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To overcome radioresistance for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer, a prospective trial of pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) interdigitated with dose-escalating conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy was performed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1991 and August 2000, 207 patients were treated with 46 Gy pelvic EBRT and increasing HDR brachytherapy boost doses (5.50-11.5 Gy/fraction) during 5 weeks. The eligibility criteria were pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >or=10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=7, or clinical Stage T2b or higher. Patients were divided into 2 dose levels, low-dose biologically effective dose <93 Gy (58 patients) and high-dose biologically effective dose >93 Gy (149 patients). No patient received hormones. We used the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure.

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years. The mean follow-up for the group was 4.4 years, and for the low and high-dose levels, it was 7.0 and 3.4 years, respectively. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rate was 74%, and the overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rate was 92%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical control rate for the low-dose group was 52%; the rate for the high-dose group was 87% (p <0.001). Improvement occurred in the cause-specific survival in favor of the brachytherapy high-dose level (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, a low-dose level, higher Gleason score, and higher nadir value were associated with increased biochemical failure. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications ranged from 0.5% to 9%. The actuarial 5-year impotency rate was 51%.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with transrectal ultrasound-guided real-time conformal HDR prostate brachytherapy boost is both a precise dose delivery system and a very effective treatment for unfavorable prostate cancer. We demonstrated an incremental beneficial effect on biochemical control and cause-specific survival with higher doses. These results, coupled with the low risk of complications, the advantage of not being radioactive after implantation, and the real-time interactive planning, define a new standard for treatment.

Three-dimensional controlled interstitial hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma--a feasibility study

PURPOSE

To perform a feasibility study of three-dimensional spatially controlled interstitial hyperthermia for locally advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twelve patients with prostate cancer (T3NxM0) were treated with conventional external beam radiotherapy and one interstitial hyperthermia treatment. Hyperthermia was delivered with the 27-MHz multielectrode current source (MECS) interstitial hyperthermia technique on an outpatient basis. Guided by transrectal ultrasonography, 12 catheters (range 7-16) were placed in the prostate through a template. Two electrodes per probe were inserted. Thermometry (average 100 sensors) was performed from within the probes for online temperature control. Additional thermometry was done in the prostate, rectum, urethra, and bladder. Reconstruction was done by sonography. Prostate perfusion was estimated from the thermal decay at the end of treatment. The full three-dimensional temperature distribution was calculated.

RESULTS

No toxicities greater than Grade 2 were recorded. A learning curve for implantation, position verification, reconstruction, and temperature simulation was experienced. Perfusion was 47 mL/100 g/min (range 30-65). The average measured temperature was T(90) (90% of the prostate reached a temperature of at least:) 39.9 degrees C and T(50) 44.1 degrees C. The average calculated temperatures were lower: T(90), 39.4 degrees C and T(50), 41.8 degrees C, because the entire prostate was taken into account. The tumor temperatures were T(90), 40.7 degrees C and T(50), 43.0 degrees C. The bladder and rectal temperatures were below the safety limits.

CONCLUSION

Multielectrode-current-source interstitial hyperthermia is technically feasible and well tolerated. It was not possible to achieve the goal temperature of 42-43 degrees C because of high perfusion and implantation limitations.

Sexual (dys)function after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a review

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer has become the most common nonskin malignant neoplasm in older men in Western countries. As treatment efficacy has improved, issues related to posttherapy quality of life and sexual functioning have become more important.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We discuss the various methods used to evaluate erectile and sexual dysfunction and the definition of potency. The etiologies of erectile dysfunction after external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for prostate cancer are also reviewed. The literature is summarized, and comparative studies of radiation and surgery are surveyed briefly.

RESULTS

Rates of erectile dysfunction vary from 6 to 84% after external beam radiotherapy and from 0 to 51% after brachytherapy. In most of the studies, the analysis is retrospective, the definition of erectile dysfunction is not clear, only one question about sexual functioning is asked, and nonvalidated instruments are used. The etiology of erectile dysfunction after radiation for prostate cancer is not completely understood.

CONCLUSIONS

Because erectile function is only one component of sexual function, it is necessary to assess sexual desire, satisfaction, frequency of intercourse, and other such factors when evaluating the effects of therapy. Patients should be offered sexual counseling and informed about the availability of effective treatments for erectile dysfunction, such as sildenafil, intracavernosal injection, and vacuum devices.