Pulsed dose rate and fractionated high dose rate brachytherapy: choice of brachytherapy schedules to replace low dose rate treatments

Interstitial brachytherapy for lip carcinomas: Comparison between Ir-192 low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate treatment

PURPOSE

Low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy are known to be effective in the treatment of lip carcinomas. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare oncologic and toxicity outcomes between the two techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2018, patients at the Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine (France) who received exclusive or adjuvant interstitial brachytherapy for lip squamous carcinomas were studied. Two groups were defined: the LDR/PDR group, including patients treated with iridium-192 wires, or pulsed-dose rate technique, and the high-dose-rate group, with patients treated by high-dose-rate technique. The dose ranged between 50Gy and 65Gy (depending on previous surgery) for low-dose-/pulsed-dose rate treatments, and 39Gy for high-dose-rate (twice a day). Early, late toxicity events and oncologic control were reported.

RESULTS

Among the 61 patients whose data were analyzed retrospectively, 36 received the low-dose-/pulsed-dose rate treatment (59%) and 25 the high-dose-rate brachytherapy (41%). The median follow-up time was 44 months. At 36 months, the local control rates were 96.3% for LDR/PDR group and 100% for HDR (P=0.180). The regional control rates were 85.9% and 92% without any difference according to the two groups (P=0.179). The specific overall survival rate was 95.5% with no difference between groups. There were more grade 2 or higher mucositis in the HDR group than in LDR/PDR group (40% versus 16.7%, P=0.042). One case of grade 3 mucositis was recorded in each group. No grade 3 late complications were recorded. High-dose-rate brachytherapy reduced the length of hospitalization by 2 days (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

High-dose- or low-dose-/pulsed-dose rate brachytherapy seemed to be as effective and well tolerated in our experience of 61 patients.

How Small Can We Go? Partial Bladder Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy

Organ preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) may use trimodality therapy. This includes transurethral resection followed by radiation therapy. Radiosensitization has become one of the standard of care approaches for MIBC with high rates of local disease control and overall survival. The goal of organ preservation is to treat MIBC while preserving a well-functioning natural bladder. Debate remains over the best way to optimize radiation therapy in bladder cancer. In MIBC the role of partial cystectomy has been utilized in smaller solitary tumors with adequate local control and good urinary function. As radiation therapy techniques improve and modernize, smaller radiation volumes to a partial bladder may play an increasing role as we utilize imaging techniques coupled with adaptive radiation therapy planning and other techniques such as brachytherapy. In this review, we explore the use of brachytherapy and partial bladder fields of external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of MIBC.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for the Performance of Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy

AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

The American College of Radiology (ACR), the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for the performance of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. LDR brachytherapy is the application of radioactive sources in or on tumors in a clinical setting with therapeutic intent. The advantages of LDR brachytherapy include improving therapeutic ratios with lower doses to nontarget organs-at-risk and higher doses to a specific target.

METHODS

This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading. The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO.

RESULTS

This practice parameter was developed to serve as a tool in the appropriate application of this evolving technology in the care of cancer patients or other patients with conditions where radiation therapy is indicated. It addresses clinical implementation of LDR brachytherapy including personnel qualifications, quality assurance standards, indications, and suggested documentation. This includes a contemporary literature search.

CONCLUSIONS

This practice parameter is a tool to guide the use of LDR brachytherapy and does not assess relative clinical indication for LDR brachytherapy when compared with other forms of brachytherapy or external beam therapy, but to focus on the best practices required to deliver LDR brachytherapy safely and effectively, when clinically indicated. Comparative costs of versus other modalities therapy may also need to be considered.

IMRT and brachytherapy comparison in gynaecological cancer treatment: thinking over dosimetry and radiobiology

Background

The role of radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of locally advanced cervical and endometrial cancer is well established. However, in some cases, intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBRT) is not recommended or cannot be carried out. We aimed to investigate whether external-beam irradiation delivered by means of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) might replace ICBRT in gynaecological cancer when the standard ICBRT boost delivering cannot be administered for technical or clinical reasons.

Materials and methods

Fifteen already delivered treatments for gynaecological cancer patients were analysed. The treatments were performed through 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to the whole-pelvis up to the dose of 45–50.4 Gy followed by a boost dose administered with ICBRT in high-dose-rate or pulsed-dose-rate modality. For each patient, IMRT plans were elaborated to mimic the ICBRT. We analysed the ICBRT boost versus IMRT boost in terms of dosimetric and radiobiological aspects.

Results

Mean conformity index value calculated on boost volume was 0.73 for ICBRT and 0.97 for IMRT. Mean conformation number was 0.24 for ICBRT boost and 0.78 for IMRT boost. Mean normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values for 3D-CRT plus ICBRT and for IMRT (pelvis plus boost) were, respectively, 28% and 5% for rectum; 1.5% and 0.1% for urinary bladder and 8.9% and 6.1% for bowel.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that IMRT may represent a viable alternative in delivering the boost in patients diagnosed with gynaecological cancer not amenable to ICBRT.

[Brachytherapy for head and neck cancers]

The main indications of the brachytherapy of head and neck cancers are the limited tumours of the lip, the nose, the oral cavity and the oropharynx. Nasopharynx tumours are nowadays treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. This technique can be exclusive, associated with external radiotherapy or postoperative. It can also be a salvage treatment for the second primaries in previously irradiated areas. If the low dose rate brachytherapy rules remain the reference, the pulse dose rate technique allows the prescription of the dose rate and the optimisation of the dose distribution. Results of high dose rate brachytherapy are now published. This paper reports the recommendations of the Gec-ESTRO, published in 2017, and takes into account the data of the historical low dose rate series, and is upgraded with the pulsed-dose rate and high dose rate series.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head & neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update - Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology

The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.

American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combined external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy for base of tongue tumors and other head and neck sites in the era of new technologies

Irradiation plays an important role in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck providing a high locoregional tumor control and preservation of organ functions. External beam irradiation (EBI) results in unnecessary radiation exposure of the surrounding normal tissues increasing the incidence of side effects (xerostomy, osteoradionecrosis, and so forth). Brachytherapy (BT) seems to be the best choice for dose escalation over a short treatment period and for minimizing radiation-related normal tissue damage due to the rapid dose falloff around the source. Low-dose-rate BT is being increasingly replaced by pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate BT because the stepping source technology offers the advantage of optimizing dose distribution by varying dwell times. Pulsed-dose and high-dose rates appear to yield local control and complication rates equivalent to those of low-dose rate. BT may be applied alone; but in case of high risk of nodal metastases, it is used together with EBI. This review presents the results and the indications of combined BT and EBI in carcinoma of the base of tongue and other sites of the head and neck region, as well as the role BT plays among other-normal tissue protecting-modern radiotherapy modalities (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy) applied in these localizations.

The Curie-Da Vinci Connection: 5-Years' Experience With Laparoscopic (Robot-Assisted) Implantation for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy of Solitary T2 Bladder Tumors

PURPOSE

To report experience and early results of laparoscopic implantation for interstitial brachytherapy (BT) of solitary bladder tumors and the feasibility of a high-dose-rate (HDR) schedule.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From December 2009 to April 2015, 57 patients with a T2 solitary bladder tumor were treated in Arnhem with transurethral bladder resection followed by external beam irradiation, applied to the bladder and regional iliac lymph nodes, 40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 fractions per week, and within 1 week interstitial HDR BT, in selected cases combined with partial cystectomy and lymph node dissection. The BT catheters were placed via a transabdominal approach with robotic assistance from a Da Vinci robot after a successful initial experience with a nonrobotic laparoscopic approach. The fraction schedule for HDR was 10 fractions of 2.5 Gy, 3 fractions per day. This was calculated to be equivalent to a reference low-dose-rate schedule of 30 Gy in 60 hours. Data for oncologic outcomes and toxicity (Common Toxicity Criteria version 4) were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

These modifications resulted in an average postoperative hospitalization of 6 days, minimal blood loss, and no wound healing problems. Two patients had severe acute toxicity: 1 pulmonary embolism grade 4 and 1 cardiac death. Late toxicity was mild (n=2 urogenital grade 3 toxicity). The median follow-up was 2 years. Using cumulative incidence competing risk analysis, the 2-year overall, disease-free, and disease-specific survival and local control rates were 59%, 71%, 87%, and 82%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of minimally invasive surgery for implantation of BT catheters and the feasibility of HDR BT in bladder cancer are documented. The patient outcome and adverse events are comparable to the best results published for a bladder-sparing approach.

A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dose.

Modern head and neck brachytherapy: from radium towards intensity modulated interventional brachytherapy

Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) is a modern development of classical interventional radiation therapy (brachytherapy), which allows the application of a high radiation dose sparing severe adverse events, thereby further improving the treatment outcome. Classical indications in head and neck (H&N) cancers are the face, the oral cavity, the naso- and oropharynx, the paranasal sinuses including base of skull, incomplete resections on important structures, and palliation. The application type can be curative, adjuvant or perioperative, as a boost to external beam radiation as well as without external beam radiation and with palliative intention. Due to the frequently used perioperative application method (intraoperative implantation of inactive applicators and postoperative performance of radiation), close interdisciplinary cooperation between surgical specialists (ENT-, dento-maxillary-facial-, neuro- and orbital surgeons), as well interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) experts are obligatory. Published results encourage the integration of IMBT into H&N therapy, thereby improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

Impact of dosimetric parameters on local control for patients treated with three-dimensional pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of dose-volume histograms parameters on local control of three-dimensional (3D) image-based pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy (BT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Within a French multicentric prospective study, the data of the 110 patients treated for cervical cancer with external beam radiotherapy followed by 3D image-based and optimized pulsed dose-rate BT were analyzed. Delineation procedures were performed on magnetic resonance imaging in a minority of cases and on CT for the majority of cases, adapted from the Gynaecological Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology recommendations. Optimization procedure was left to the discretion of the treating center.

RESULTS

At 2 years, local control rate reached 78%. Dose to Point A, total reference air kerma, and intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV) V60 were predictive factors for local control (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.013, respectively). Patients with IR-CTV V60 <75% had a relative risk of local recurrence of 3.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-11.1). There was no correlation found between the high-risk clinical target volume dosimetric parameters and local control.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentric study has shown that 3D image-based BT provides a high local control rate for cervical cancer patients. The V60 for IR-CTV was identified as an important predictive factor for local control.

A brachytherapy plan evaluation tool for interstitial applications

Radiobiological metrics such as tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) help in assessing the quality of brachytherapy plans. Application of such metrics in clinics as well as research is still inadequate. This study presents the implementation of two indigenously designed plan evaluation modules: Brachy_TCP and Brachy_NTCP. Evaluation tools were constructed to compute TCP and NTCP from dose volume histograms (DVHs) of any interstitial brachytherapy treatment plan. The computation module was employed to estimate probabilities of tumor control and normal tissue complications in ten cervical cancer patients based on biologically effective equivalent uniform dose (BEEUD). The tumor control and normal tissue morbidity were assessed with clinical followup and were scored. The acute toxicity was graded using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Outcome score was found to be correlated with the TCP/NTCP estimates. Thus, the predictive ability of the estimates was quantified with the clinical outcomes. Biologically effective equivalent uniform dose-based formalism was found to be effective in predicting the complexities and disease control.

Bladder function preservation with brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and limited surgery in bladder cancer patients: Long-term results [corrected]

PURPOSE

To report long-term results of a bladder preservation strategy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) using external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy/interstitial radiation therapy (IRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1989 and October 2011, 192 selected patients with MIBC were treated with a combined regimen of preoperative external beam radiation therapy and subsequent surgical exploration with or without partial cystectomy and insertion of source carrier tubes for afterloading IRT using low dose rate and pulsed dose rate. Data for oncologic and functional outcomes were prospectively collected. The primary endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), bladder function preservation survival, and salvage cystectomy-free survival. The endpoints were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 105.5 months. The LRFS rate was 80% and 73% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Salvage cystectomy-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 93% and 85%. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 65% and 46%, whereas cancer-specific survival at 5 and 10 years was 75% and 67%. The distant metastases-free survival rate was 76% and 69% at 5 and 10 years. Multivariate analysis revealed no independent predictors of LRFS. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥3 late bladder and rectum toxicity were recorded in 11 patients (5.7%) and 2 patients (1%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A multimodality bladder-sparing regimen using IRT offers excellent long-term oncologic outcome in selected patients with MIBC. The late toxicity rate is low, and the majority of patients preserve their functional bladder.

Long term results of a prospective dose escalation phase-II trial: interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy as boost for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We reviewed our seven year single institution experience with pulsed dose rate brachytherapy dose escalation study in patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We treated a total of 130 patients for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer at our institution between 2000 and 2007 using PDR-brachytherapy as a boost after conformal external beam radiation therapy to 50.4 Gy. The majority of patients had T2 disease (T1c 6%, T2 75%, T3 19%). Seventy three patients had intermediate-risk and 53 patients had high-risk disease according to the D'Amico classification. The dose of the brachytherapy boost was escalated from 25 to 35 Gy - 33 pts. received 25 Gy (total dose 75 Gy), 63 pts. 30 Gy (total dose 80 Gy) and 34 pts. 35 Gy, (total dose 85 Gy) given in one session (dose per pulse was 0.60 Gy or 0.70 Gy/h, 24h per day, night and day, with a time interval of 1h between two pulses). PSA-recurrence-free survival according to Kaplan-Meier using the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure was calculated and also late toxicities according to Common Toxicity Criteria scale were assessed.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis with a median follow-up of 60 months biochemical control was achieved by 88% of patients - only 16/130 patients (12.3%) developed a biochemical relapse. Biochemical relapse free survival calculated according to Kaplan-Meier for all patients at 5 years was 85.6% (83.9% for intermediate-risk patients and 84.2% for high-risk patients) and at 9 years' follow up it was 79.0%. Analysing biochemical relapse free survival separately for different boost dose levels, at 5 years it was 97% for the 35 Gy boost dose and 82% for the 25 and 30 Gy dose levels. The side effects of therapy were negligible: There were 18 cases (15%) of grade 1/2 rectal proctitis, one case (0.8%) of grade 3 proctitis, 18 cases (15%) of grade 1/2 cystitis, and no cases (0%) with dysuria grade 3. No patient had a bulbourethral stricture requiring dilation or new onset incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided conformal PDR-brachytherapy using up to 35 Gy as boost dose after 50 Gy of external beam radiation therapy (total dose up to 85 Gy) is a very effective treatment option with very low morbidity in patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer. Further dose escalation seems possible.

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part III: low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To develop a guideline for quality practice of low-dose-rate (LDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) with expertise in cervical cancer brachytherapy formulated updated guidelines for LDR and PDR brachytherapy for locally advanced (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] Stages IB2-IVA) cervical cancer based on literature review and clinical experience.

RESULTS

The ABS strongly recommends the use of brachytherapy as a component of the definitive treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Precise applicator placement is necessary to maximize the probability of achieving local control without major side effects. The ABS recommends a cumulative delivered dose of approximately 80-90Gy for definitive treatment. Dosimetry must be performed after each insertion before treatment delivery. The dose delivered to point A should be reported for all intracavitary brachytherapy applications regardless of treatment planning technique. The ABS also recommends adoption of the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines for contouring, image-based treatment planning and dose reporting. Interstitial brachytherapy may be considered for a small proportion of patients whose disease cannot be adequately encompassed by intracavitary application and should be performed by practitioners with special expertise in these procedures. Quality management measures must be performed, and follow-up information should also be obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated ABS guidelines are provided for LDR and PDR brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these guidelines to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt dose-reporting policies that are critical for outcome analysis.

Biological equivalence between LDR and PDR in cervical cancer: multifactor analysis using the linear-quadratic model

Purpose

The purpose of this work was the biological comparison between Low Dose Rate (LDR) and Pulsed Dose Rate (PDR) in cervical cancer regarding the discontinuation of the afterloading system used for the LDR treatments at our Institution since December 2009.

Material and methods

In the first phase we studied the influence of the pulse dose and the pulse time in the biological equivalence between LDR and PDR treatments using the Linear Quadratic Model (LQM). In the second phase, the equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction (EQD₂) for the tumor, rectum and bladder in treatments performed with both techniques was evaluated and statistically compared. All evaluated patients had stage IIB cervical cancer and were treated with External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) plus two Brachytherapy (BT) applications. Data were collected from 48 patients (26 patients treated with LDR and 22 patients with PDR).

Results

In the analyses of the influence of PDR parameters in the biological equivalence between LDR and PDR treatments (Phase 1), it was calculated that if the pulse dose in PDR was kept equal to the LDR dose rate, a small the-rapeutic loss was expected. If the pulse dose was decreased, the therapeutic window became larger, but a correction in the prescribed dose was necessary. In PDR schemes with 1 hour interval between pulses, the pulse time did not influence significantly the equivalent dose. In the comparison between the groups treated with LDR and PDR (Phase 2) we concluded that they were not equivalent, because in the PDR group the total EQD₂ for the tumor, rectum and bladder was smaller than in the LDR group; the LQM estimated that a correction in the prescribed dose of 6% to 10% was ne-cessary to avoid therapeutic loss.

Conclusions

A correction in the prescribed dose was necessary; this correction should be achieved by calculating the PDR dose equivalent to the desired LDR total dose.

Pulsed brachytherapy: a modelled consideration of repair parameter uncertainties and their influence on treatment duration extension and daytime-only "block-schemes"

OBJECTIVES

The radiobiological modelling of all types of protracted brachytherapy is susceptible to uncertainties in the values of tissue repair parameters. Although this effect has been explored for many aspects of pulsed brachytherapy (PB), it is usually considered within the constraint of a fixed brachytherapy treatment time. Here the impact of repair parameter uncertainty is assessed for PB treatments of variable duration. The potential use of "block-schemes" (blocks of PB pulses separated by night-time gaps) is also investigated.

METHODS

PB schedule constraints are based on the cervical cancer protocols of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH), but the methodology is applicable to any combination of starting schedule and treatment constraint. Calculations are performed using the biologically effective dose (BED) as a tissue-specific comparison metric. The ratio of normal tissue BED to tumour BED is considered for PB regimens with varying total pulse numbers and/or "block-schemes".

RESULTS

For matched brachytherapy duration, PB has a good "window of opportunity" relative to the existing RMH continuous low dose rate (CLDR) practice for all modelled repair half-times. The most clear-cut route to radiobiological optimisation of PB is via modest temporal extension of the PB regimen relative to the CLDR reference. This option may be practicable for those centres with scope to extend their relatively short CLDR treatment durations.

CONCLUSION

Although daytime-only "block-scheme" PB for cervical cancer has not yet been employed clinically, the possibilities appear to be theoretically promising, providing the overall (external beam plus brachytherapy) treatment duration is not extended relative to current practice, such that additional tumour repopulation becomes a concern.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy - is it the right way?

Pulsed dose rate (PDR-BT) treatment is a brachytherapy modality that combines physical advantages of high-dose-rate (HDR-BT) technology (isodose optimization, radiation safety) with the radiobiological advantages of low-dose-rate (LDR-BT) brachytherapy. Pulsed brachytherapy consists of using stronger radiation source than for LDR-BT and producing series of short exposures of 10 to 30 minutes in every hour to approximately the same total dose in the same overall time as with the LDR-BT. Modern afterloading equipment offers certain advantages over interstitial or intracavitary insertion of separate needles, tubes, seeds or wires. Isodose volumes in tissues can be created flexibly by a combination of careful placement of the catheter and the adjustment of the dwell times of the computerized stepping source. Automatic removal of the radiation sources into a shielded safe eliminates radiation exposures to staff and visitors. Radiation exposure is also eliminated to the staff who formerly loaded and unloaded multiplicity of radioactive sources into the catheters, ovoids, tubes etc. This review based on summarized clinical investigations, analyses the feasibility and the background to introduce this brachytherapy technique and chosen clinical applications of PDR-BT.

Influence of length of interval between pulses in PDR brachytherapy (PDRBT) on value of Biologically Equivalent Dose (BED) in healthy tissues

Purpose

Different PDR treatment schemas are used in clinical practice, however optimal length of interval between pulses still remains unclear. The aim of this work was to compare value of BED doses measured in surrounded healthy tissues according to different intervals between pulses in PDRBT. Influence of doses optimization on BED values was analyzed.

Material and methods

Fifty-one patients treated in Greater Poland Cancer Centre were qualified for calculations. Calculations of doses were made in 51 patients with head and neck cancer, brain tumor, breast cancer, sarcoma, penis cancer and rectal cancer. Doses were calculated with the use of PLATO planning system in chosen critical points in surrounded healthy tissues. For all treatment plans the doses were compared using Biologically Equivalent Dose formula. Three interval lengths (1, 2 and 4 hours) between pulses were chosen for calculations. For statistical analysis Friedman ANOVA test and Kendall ratio were used.

Results

The median value of BED in chosen critical points in healthy tissues was statistically related to the length of interval between PDR pulses and decreased exponentially with 1 hour interval to 4 hours (Kendall = from 0.48 to 1.0; p = from 0.002 to 0.00001).

Conclusions

Prolongation of intervals between pulses in PDR brachytherapy was connected with lower values of BED doses in healthy tissues. It seems that longer intervals between pulses reduced the risk of late complications, but also decreased the tumour control. Furthermore, optimization influenced the increase of doses in healthy tissues.

GEC-ESTRO recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Both primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are classic indications for brachytherapy. A high rate of local tumor control at the cost of limited morbidity can be achieved with brachytherapy through good patient selection, meticulous source implantation and careful treatment planning. However, no randomized trials have been performed, and there is scant evidence in the literature especially regarding practical clinical recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck subsites. The Head and Neck Working Group of the European Brachytherapy Group (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) therefore decided to formulate the present consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery is also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the paucity of evidence in the literature, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience accumulated by the members of the working group over several decades and the respective publications. The recommendations cover in a general part (1) patient selection, the pre-treatment work up and patient care, (2) treatment strategy, (3) target definition, (4) implant techniques, (5) dose and dose rate prescription, (6) treatment planning and reporting, (7) treatment monitoring (8) catheter removal, and (9) post-treatment patient care and follow-up. The recommendations are then specified for the classical brachytherapy tumor sites following an analogue more focussed structure (patient selection, implant technique, target definition, dose and dose rate prescription, results): lip, oral mucosa, mobile tongue, floor of mouth, oropharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses.

[Brachytherapy of head and neck cancer]

In the non-surgical treatment of head and neck tumours, the "organ preserving" modalities have become more and more important. At present radiotherapy is the most important means of this kind of treatment. In the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer local dose escalation is an important factor in increasing local tumour control. However, with sole external beam irradiation it is difficult to spare adjacent normal tissues. Interstitial brachytherapy (BT) is ideally suited to deliver a high dose limited to the volume of the primary tumour, thus maximizing tumour control while minimizing complications. Low-dose-rate (LDR) BT, which has been applied for a long time in the treatment of these tumours, is now challenged by high-dose-rate (HDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) BT. The purpose of this work is to show the role and the indications of BT in tumours of the head and neck region and to offer general and site-specific recommendations based upon the available information from the literature.

Qualitative dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of high - dose - rate interstitial brachytherapy implants

Radiation quality indices (QI), tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability(NTCP) were evaluated for ideal single and double plane HDR interstitial implants. In the analysis, geometrically-optimized at volume (GOV) treatment plans were generated for different values of inter-source-spacing (ISS) within the catheter, inter-catheter-spacing (ICS), and inter-plane-spacing (IPS) for single - and double - plane implants. The dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for each plan, and the coverage volumes of 100%, 150%, and 200% were obtained to calculate QIs, TCP, and NTCP. Formulae for biologically effective equivalent uniform dose (BEEUD), for tumor and normal tissues, were derived to calculate TCP and NTCP. Optimal values of QIs, except external volume index (EI), and TCP were obtained at ISS = 1.0 cm, and ICS = 1.0 cm, for single-plane implants, and ISS = 1.0 cm, ICS = 1.0 cm, and IPS = 0.75 to 1.25 cm, for double - plane implants. From this study, it is assessed that ISS = 1.0 cm, ICS = 1.0 cm, for single - plane implant and IPS between 0.75 cm to 1.25 cm provide better dose conformity and uniformity.

Quality of interstitial PDR-brachytherapy-implants of head-and-neck-cancers: predictive factors for local control and late toxicity?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Parameters and indices related to the implant geometry in use for describing the quality of volume implants in interstitial brachytherapy were developed on the basis of LDR-brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate their usefulness for predicting late toxicity and local control in the PDR-brachytherapy of head-and-neck-tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and October 2004, 210 patients were treated with PDR-brachytherapy which was administered either postoperatively or as definitive treatment. Brachytherapy was used as sole treatment in some cases while in others a combination with EBRT was used. For assessment of quality of implants we analyzed the following indices and parameters using the univariate chi2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis: V85, V120 and V150 (volume enclosed by the surface of the 85%-, 120%- and 150%-isodose), UI (uniformity index), QI (quality index), HI (homogeneity index), VGR (volume gradient ratio), DNR (dose non-uniformity ratio), LD (low dose), HD (high dose), PD (peak dose) and the intersource spacing.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 24 months (4-50) the rate of - usually transient - soft tissue necrosis (STN) was 11%, osteoradionecrosis (ORN) was seen in 7.6% of cases and local relapse occurred in 7% of cases. Univariate analysis shows a significant influence on the development of soft tissue necrosis for V85, and on osteoradionecrosis for HD and PD. In the multivariate analysis a correlation between soft tissue necrosis and QI was found. For local control a correlation with QI, VGR and minimal tube distance was found using univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using interstitial PDR-brachytherapy in head-and-neck-tumors the probability of local control and of the development of soft tissue necrosis or osteoradionecrosis is dependent on dose and volume parameter like the volume of the reference isodose, the high and peak dose values, on the homogeneity of the dose distribution, quantified by the quality index or the volume gradient ratio as well on the minimal tube distance.

Response to pulsed dose rate and low dose rate irradiation with and without mild hyperthermia using human breast carcinoma cell lines

The purpose of this study was to establish whether a pulsed dose rate (PDR) treatment of 1.5 Gy given every 3 h in combination with 41 degrees C mild hyperthermia or a continuous low dose rate (LDR) treatment with mild hyperthermia could radiosensitize two isogenic human breast carcinoma cell lines in comparison to pulsed dose rate or low dose rate irradiation alone. The radiation resistant cell line was derived from the parental cell line and was transfected to over-express DNA polymerase beta. The end-points assessed were the survival of the cells using the clonogenic assay, the amount of residual DSB(s) using the comet assay and gene expression of polymerase beta using RT-PCR. Results showed that the PDR and LDR treatments combined with mild hyperthermia caused significant radiosensitization when compared to PDR and LDR irradiation alone in terms of the clonogenic and comet assays with both cell lines. RT-PCR results showed that polymerase beta levels of expression were not elevated in response to these treatments, implying that this polymerase may not be involved in sub-lethal damage repair or thermal radiosensitization. These results suggest a potential clinical advantage when combining LDR or PDR with hyperthermia, since they indicate that hyperthermia is an effective radiosensitizer.

GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to present the GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations for template and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided transperineal temporary interstitial prostate brachytherapy using a high dose rate iridium-192 stepping source and a remote afterloading technique. Experts in prostate brachytherapy developed these recommendations on behalf of the GEC/ESTRO and of the EAU. The paper has been approved by both GEC/ESTRO steering committee members and EAU committee members.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to organ confined prostate cancer can be applied as a boost treatment in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) using a proper number of BT fractions in curative intent. Temporary transperineal BT alone or in combination with EBRT are feasible as a palliative/salvage treatment modality because of local recurrence, however, without large clinical experience. The use of temporary BT as a monotherapy is subject of ongoing clinical research.

RESULTS

Recommendations for pre-treatment investigations, patient selection, equipment and facilities, the clinical team, the implant procedure (treatment planning and needle implantation) dose and fractionation, reporting, management of side effects and follow-up are given.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are intended to be technically and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for the medical decision rests with the treating physician. Although, this paper represents the consensus of an interdisciplinary group of experts, TRUS and template guided temporary transperineal interstitial implants in prostate cancer are a constantly evolving field and the recommendations are subject to modifications as new data become available.

Radical radiotherapy compared with surgery for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue

PURPOSE

This study reports on T3/T4 base of tongue (BOT) tumors treated at the Erasmus MC (Rotterdam) with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT). Local control, survival, and functional outcome are compared to results obtained in similar patients treated at the Vrije University Medical Center (VUMC, Amsterdam) by surgery and postoperative RT (PORT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

At Rotterdam 46/2 Gy was given to the primary and bilateral neck, followed by an implant using low-dose-rate (LDR 24-35 Gy; median 27 Gy), or fractionated high-dose-rate (fr. HDR 20-28 Gy; median 24 Gy). A neck dissection (ND) was performed in case of N+ disease. 67% of BOT tumors had a T4 cancer. At Amsterdam surgery (S) followed by PORT 40-70 Gy (median 60 Gy) was performed; 26% BOT tumors were T4. Sex, age and nodal distribution were similar. Actuarial local control and survival were computed. Performance Status Scale (PSS) scores were established. Xerostomis was determined on visual analog scales (VAS).

RESULTS

Local failure at 5-years was 37% (Rotterdam) vs. 9% (Amsterdam) (p < 0.01). The overall survival was not significantly different (median 2.5 years vs. 2.9 years, respectively [p = 0.47]). The PSS favored brachytherapy. Both groups were equally affected by xerostomia.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year local control was 65% with EBRT and BT. This result is strongly affected by 4 patients with residual disease after implantation. The Rotterdam patients had more advanced BOT tumors (67% vs. 26% T4), explaining the higher local failure rate. Given the organ preservation properties of radiotherapy-only and the better PSS scores, the jury is still out on the optimal treatment for BOT tumors.

Role of endocavitary brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy in cancer of the nasopharynx

PURPOSE

We previously reported our preliminary experience with nasopharyngeal cancer boosted after 60-70 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) by fractionated endocavitary brachytherapy (ECBT) to cumulative doses of 78-82 Gy. As for Stage III-IVB disease, cisplatin (CDDP)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) was given. The aim of the present study was to define the role of ECBT more accurately.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-one patients with primary nasopharyngeal cancer, staged according to the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification system, were treated between 1991 and 2000 with 60-70 Gy external beam radiotherapy and 11-18 Gy ECBT. Of the 91 patients, 21 were treated in conjunction with CHT and 70 without CHT. Tumors were subdivided into undifferentiated (UD) and well, moderately, and poorly differentiated (WMP-D) subtypes. Treatment results were analyzed for local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis found stage, treatment period, age, and grade significant for LC, DFS, and OS. At 2 years, for Stage I-IIB (1st period, 1991-1996), the LC, DFS, and OS were 96%, 88%, and 80%, respectively, vs. 65%, 46%, and 52% for Stage III-IVB. For the 2nd treatment period (1996-2000; CHT for Stage III-IVB), the LC, DFS, and OS at 2 years was 100%, 90%, and 61% (Stage I-IIB), respectively, vs. 86%, 74%, and 66% (Stage III-IVB). Three prognostic groups (PGs) were constructed. For the 1991-1996 period, at 2 years, patients in the good PG (UD Stage I-IIB disease) had 100% LC and 92% OS; those in the intermediate PG (UD Stage III-IVB or WMP-D Stage I-IIB), had 94% LC and 71% OS; and those in the poor PG (WMP-D Stage III-IVB) had 47% LC and 40% OS. For the 1996-2000 period, at 2 years, the good PG had 100% LC and 88% OS; the intermediate PG had 100% LC and 64% OS; and the poor PG had 71% LC and 60% OS.

CONCLUSION

For Stage I-IIB disease treated between 1991 and 2000, at 3 years, the LC and OS was 97% and 67%, respectively. The results with 77-81 Gy without CHT warrant EBRT combined with ECBT to remain our standard of care for Stage I-IIB disease. For N2-3 and/or T3-4 tumors, in addition to high doses of RT, neoadjuvant CHT was administered as of 1996. For the 1991-2000 period, at 3 years, the LC was 86% and the OS was 72% with CHT, with little extra morbidity; they were 68% and 35% without CHT. Because of better target coverage and sparing, T3-4 tumors are currently boosted by stereotactic RT to 81.2 Gy.

The optimal fraction size in high-dose-rate brachytherapy: dependency on tissue repair kinetics and low-dose rate

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Indications of the existence of long repair half-times on the order of 2-4 h for late-responding human normal tissues have been obtained from continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART). Recently, these data were used to explain, on the basis of the biologically effective dose (BED), the potential superiority of fractionated high-dose rate (HDR) with large fraction sizes of 5-7 Gy over continuous low-dose rate (LDR) irradiation at 0.5 Gy/h in cervical carcinoma. We investigated the optimal fraction size in HDR brachytherapy and its dependency on treatment choices (overall treatment time, number of HDR fractions, and time interval between fractions) and treatment conditions (reference low-dose rate, tissue repair characteristics).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiobiologic model calculations were performed using the linear-quadratic model for incomplete mono-exponential repair. An irradiation dose of 20 Gy was assumed to be applied either with HDR in 2-12 fractions or continuously with LDR for a range of dose rates. HDR and LDR treatment regimens were compared on the basis of the BED and BED ratio of normal tissue and tumor, assuming repair half-times between 1 h and 4 h.

RESULTS

With the assumption that the repair half-time of normal tissue was three times longer than that of the tumor, hypofractionation in HDR relative to LDR could result in relative normal tissue sparing if the optimum fraction size is selected. By dose reduction while keeping the tumor BED constant, absolute normal tissue sparing might therefore be achieved. This optimum HDR fraction size was found to be largely dependent on the LDR dose rate. On the basis of the BED(NT/TUM) ratio of HDR over LDR, 3 x 6.7 Gy would be the optimal HDR fractionation scheme for replacement of an LDR scheme of 20 Gy in 10-30 h (dose rate 2-0.67 Gy/h), while at a lower dose rate of 0.5 Gy/h, four fractions of 5 Gy would be preferential, still assuming large differences between tumor and normal tissue repair half-times and equal overall treatment time. For the same fraction size, an even larger normal tissue sparing can be obtained by prolongation of the HDR overall treatment time.

CONCLUSION

Radiobiologic model calculations presented here aim to demonstrate that hypofractionation in HDR might have its opportunities for widening the therapeutic window, but definitely has its limits. For each specific combination of the parameters, a theoretical optimal HDR fraction size with regard to relative or absolute normal tissue sparing can be estimated, but because of uncertainty in the biologic parameters, these hypofractionation schemes cannot be generalized for all HDR brachytherapy indications.

Clinical implications of incomplete repair parameters for rat spinal cord: the feasibility of large doses per fraction in PDR and HDR brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical implications of the repair parameters determined experimentally in rat spinal cord and to test the feasibility of large doses per fraction or pulses in daytime high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy treatment schedules as an alternative to continuous low-dose-rate (CLDR) brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

BED calculations with the incomplete repair LQ-model were performed for a primary CLDR-brachytherapy treatment of 70 Gy in 140 h or a typical boost protocol of 25 Gy in 50 h after 46-Gy conventional external beam irradiation (ERT) at 2 Gy per fraction each day. Assuming biphasic repair kinetics and a variable dose rate for the iridium-192- (192Ir) stepping source, the LQ-model parameters for rat spinal cord as derived in three different experimental studies were used: (a) two repair processes with an alpha/beta ratio = 2.47 Gy and repair half-times of 0.2 h (12 min) and 2.2 h (Pop et. al.); (b) two repair processes with an alpha/beta ratio = 2.0 Gy and repair half-times of 0.7 h (42 min) and 3.8 h (Ang et al.); and (c) two repair processes with an alpha/beta ratio = 2.0 Gy and repair half-times of 0.25 h (15 min) and 6.4 h (Landuyt et al.). For tumor tissue, an alpha/beta ratio of 10 Gy and a monoexponential repair half time of 0.5 h was assumed. The calculated BED values were compared with the biologic effect of a clinical reference dose of conventional ERT with 2 Gy/day and complete repair between the fractions. Subsequently, assuming a two-catheter implant similar to that used in our experimental study and with the repair parameters derived in our rat model, BED calculations were performed for alternative PDR- and HDR-brachytherapy treatment schedules, in which the irradiation was delivered only during daytime.

RESULTS

If the repair parameters of the study of Pop et al., Ang et al., or Landuyt et al. are used, for a CLDR-treatment of 70 Gy in 140 h, the calculated BED values were 117, 193, or 216 Gy(sc) (Gy(sc) was used to express the BED value for the spinal cord), respectively. These BED values correspond with total doses of conventional ERT of 65, 96, or 104 Gy. The latter two are unrealistic high values and illustrate the danger of a straightforward comparison of BED values if repair parameters are used in situations quite different from those in which they were derived. For a brachytherapy boost protocol, the impact of the different repair parameters is less, due to the fact that the percentage increase in total BED value by the brachytherapy boost is less than 50%. If a primary treatment with CLDR brachytherapy delivering 70 Gy in 140 h has to be replaced, high doses per fraction or pulses (> 1 Gy) during daytime can only be used if the overall treatment time is prolonged with 3-4 days. The dose rate during the fraction or pulse should not exceed 6 Gy/h. For a typical brachytherapy boost protocol after 46 Gy ERT, it seems to be safe to replace CLDR delivering a total dose of 25 Gy in 50 h by a total dose of 24 Gy in 4 days with HDR or PDR brachytherapy during daytime only. Total dose per day should be limited to 6 Gy, and the largest time interval as possible between each fraction or pulse should be used.

CONCLUSION

Extrapolations based on longer repair half-times in a CLDR reference scheme may lead to the calculation of unrealistically high BED values and dangerously high doses for alternative HDR and PDR treatment schedules. Based on theoretical calculations with the IR model and using the repair parameters derived in our rat spinal cord model, it is estimated that with certain restrictions, large doses per fraction or pulses can be used during daytime schedules of HDR or PDR brachytherapy as an alternative to CLDR brachytherapy, especially for those treatment conditions in which brachytherapy is used after ERT for only less than 50% of the total dose.

The use of the linear quadratic model in radiotherapy: a review

To be able to predict the impact of any radiotherapy treatment the physics of radiation interactions and the expected biological effect for any radiotherapy treatment situation (dose, fractionation, modality) must be both understood and modelled. This review considers the current use and accuracy of the linear quadratic model which can be used to consider the variation in tissue response with fraction size. Cell kill following radiation damage results from damage to the DNA which can take a variety of forms. In many cases the linear quadratic model is used to estimate the relative impact for different situations especially clinical studies relating to fraction size. This is mainly undertaken using parameters derived from the linear quadratic model such as biological effective dose and standard effective dose. The model has also been adapted to consider the effect of overall treatment time, repair during treatment (as occurs for brachytherapy treatments) and other situations. There are some concerns over its use, mainly in the small dose ranges (both total low doses and low doses per fraction) where studies have shown its inaccuracy. In other situations however it does appear to provide a reasonable estimate of relative clinical effect. As with all models, however results should never be considered out of clinical context.

Office hours pulsed brachytherapy boost in breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiobiological studies suggest equivalent biological effects between continuous low dose rate brachytherapy (CLDR) and pulsed brachytherapy (PB) when pulses are applied without interruption every hour. However, radiation protection and institute-specific demands requested the design of a practical PB protocol substituting the CLDR boost in breast cancer patients. An office hours scheme was designed, considering the CLDR dose rate, the overall treatment time, pulse frequency and tissue repair characteristics. Radiobiological details are presented as well as the logistics and technical feasibility of the scheme after treatment of the first 100 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated according to the linear quadratic model for incomplete repair. Radiobiological parameters included an alpha/beta value of 3 Gy for normal tissue late effects and 10 Gy for early normal tissue or tumour effects. Tissue repair half-time ranged from 0.1 to 6 h. The reference CLDR dose rate of 0.80 Gy/h was obtained retrospectively from analysis of patients' data. The treatment procedure was evaluated with regard to variations in implant characteristics after treatment of 100 patients.

RESULTS

A PB protocol was designed consisting of two treatment blocks separated by a night break. Dose delivery in PB was 20 Gy in two 10 Gy blocks and, for application of the 15 Gy boost, one 10 Gy block plus one 5 Gy block. The dose per pulse was 1.67 Gy, applied with a period time of approximately 1.5 h. An inter-patient variation of 30% (1 SD) was observed in the instantaneous source strength. Taking also the spread in implant size into account, the net variation in pulse duration amounted to 38%.

CONCLUSION

An office hours PB boost regimen was designed for substitution of the CLDR boost in breast-conserving therapy on the basis of the BED. First treatment experience shows the office hour regimen to be convenient to the patients and no technical perturbations were encountered.

Equivalence of hyperfractionated and continuous brachytherapy in a rat tumor model and remarkable effectiveness when preceded by external irradiation

PURPOSE

In clinical brachytherapy, there is a tendency to replace continuous low-dose-rate (LDR) irradiation by either single-dose or fractionated high-dose-rate (HDR) irradiation. In this study, the equivalence of LDR treatments and fractionated HDR (2 fractions/day) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR, 4 fractions/day) schedules in terms of tumor cure was investigated in an experimental tumor model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tumors (rat rhabdomyosarcoma R1M) were grown s.c. in the flank of rats and implanted with 4 catheters guided by a template. All interstitial radiation treatment (IRT) schedules were given in the same geometry. HDR was given using an (192)Ir single-stepping source. To investigate small fraction sizes, part of the fractionated HDR and PDR schedules were applied after an external irradiation (ERT) top-up dose. The endpoint was the probability of tumor control at 150 days after treatment. Cell survival was estimated by excision assay.

RESULTS

Although there was no fractionation effect for fractionated HDR given in 1 or 2 fractions per day, TCD(50)-values were substantially lower than that for LDR. A PDR schedule with an interfraction interval of 3 h (4 fractions/day), however, was equivalent to LDR. The combination of ERT and IRT resulted in a remarkably increased tumor control probability in all top-up regimens, but no difference was found between 2 or 4 fractions/day. Catheter implantation alone decreased the TCD(50) for single-dose ERT already by 17.4 Gy. Cell viability assessed at 24 h after treatment demonstrated an increased effectiveness of interstitial treatment, but, after 10 Gy ERT followed by 10 Gy IRT (24-h interval), it was not less than that calculated for the combined effect of these treatments given separately.

CONCLUSION

In full fractionation schedules employing large fractions and long intervals, the sparing effect of sublethal damage repair may be significantly counteracted by reoxygenation. During 3-h intervals, however, repair may be largely completed with only partial reoxygenation causing PDR schedules to be less effective than fractionated HDR, and equivalent to LDR. Brachytherapy with clinically sized fractions after a large external top-up dose showed a remarkable increase in tumor control rate with no effect of fractionation (up to 4 fractions/day), which could not be fully explained by differences in dose distribution or in the cell viability assessed after treatment. This suggests a longer lasting effect on cell survival or radiosensitivity associated with catheter implantation shortly after the top-up dose.

A model for optimizing normal tissue complication probability in the spinal cord using a generalized incomplete repair scheme

The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment protocol, in terms of dose fractions and interfraction intervals, which minimizes normal tissue complication probability in the spinal cord for a given total treatment dose and treatment time. We generalize the concept of incomplete repair in the linear-quadratic model, allowing for arbitrary dose fractions and interfraction intervals. This is incorporated into a previously presented model of normal tissue complication probability for the spinal cord. Equations are derived for both mono-exponential and bi-exponential repair schemes, regarding each dose fraction and interfraction interval as an independent parameter, subject to the constraints of fixed total treatment dose and treatment time. When the interfraction intervals are fixed and equal, an exact analytical solution is found. The general problem is nonlinear and is solved numerically using simulated annealing. For constant interfraction intervals and varying dose fractions, we find that optimal normal tissue complication probability is obtained by two large and equal doses at the start and conclusion of the treatment, with the rest of the doses equal to one another and smaller than the two dose spikes. A similar result is obtained for bi-exponential repair. For the general case where the interfraction intervals are discrete and also vary, the pattern of two large dose spikes is maintained, while the interfraction intervals oscillate between the smallest two values. As the minimum interfraction interval is reduced, the normal tissue complication probability decreases, indicating that the global minimum is achieved in the continuum limit, where the dose delivered by the "middle" fractions is given continuously at a low dose rate. Furthermore, for bi-exponential repair, it is seen that as the slow component of repair becomes increasingly dominant as the magnitude of the dose spikes decreases. Continuous low-dose-rate irradiation with dose spikes at the start and end of treatment yields the lowest normal tissue complication probability in the spinal cord, given a fixed total dose and total treatment time, for both mono-exponential and bi-exponential repair. The magnitudes of the dose spikes can be calculated analytically, and are in close agreement with the numerical results.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy in head and neck cancers. Feasibility study of a French cooperative group

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy to mimic the continuous low dose rate (cLDR) iridium wire technique in head and neck carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 30 patients were included from June 1995 to May 1998. The primaries were located in the oral cavity (four T1, seven T2 and two T3), the velotonsillar arch (eight T1 and eight T2) and the posterior wall (one T3). Thirteen were irradiated by exclusive brachytherapy (dose, > or =45 Gy). The PDR delivered 0.5 Gy/pulse, one pulse/h, day and night, to mimic cLDR irradiation.

RESULTS

The implantation was feasible for all the patients, usually easy and of good quality. The mean duration/pulse was 13 min, with a mean source activity of 171 mCi. Patient tolerance was poor in nine cases. Sixteen patients could receive the whole PDR treatment with a total ranging from 30 to 120 pulses without any problem. Seven had short breakdowns (< or =6 h). Seven had definitive breakdowns, but could end the irradiation by manual afterloading of iridium 192 wires. The radioprotection was better (or complete), except for one patient. Most of the breakdowns were related to kinking or flattering of the tube.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR is feasible in head and neck carcinomas, but necessitates improvement of the quality and control of the plastic tubes.

Quality control in interstitial brachytherapy of the breast using pulsed dose rate: treatment planning and dose delivery with an Ir-192 afterloading system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In the Radiotherapy Department of Leuven, about 20% of all breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery and external radiotherapy receive an additional boost with pulsed dose rate (PDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy. An investigation was performed to assess the accuracy of the delivered PDR brachytherapy treatment. Secondly, the feasibility of in vivo measurements during PDR dose delivery was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two phantoms are manufactured to mimic a breast, one for thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) measurements, and one for dosimetry using radiochromic films. The TLD phantom allows measurements at 34 dose points in three planes including the basal dose points. The film phantom is designed in such a way that films can be positioned in a plane parallel and orthogonal to the needles.

RESULTS

The dose distributions calculated with the TPS are in good agreement with both TLD and radiochromic film measurements (average deviations of point doses <+/-5%). However, close to the interface tissue-air the dose is overestimated by the TPS since it neglects the finite size of a breast and the associated lack of backscatter (average deviations of point doses -14%).

CONCLUSION

Most deviations between measured and calculated doses, are in the order of magnitude of the uncertainty associated with the source strength specification, except for the point doses measured close to the skin. In vivo dosimetry during PDR brachytherapy treatment was found to be a valuable procedure to detect large errors, e.g. errors caused by an incorrect data transfer.

Evidence for adaptive response and implication in pulse-simulated low-dose-rate radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy as a substitute for continuous low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy has a number of clinical advantages. However, early results show that some cells can exhibit an adaptive response to radiation and in PDR where many pulses are given such an adaptive response may play an important role in the outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine human cell lines (two normal fibroblast and seven tumor) were evaluated for an adaptive response. Cells were given either a single adapting dose before a challenge dose or given PDR sequences for which the average dose rate matched the LDR dose rate. Response was assessed using the colony survival assay.

RESULTS

Five of the nine cell lines showed an adapting response to single small doses of radiation. Three of these cell lines were further investigated for adapting response to PDR and two of the three lines (one ovarian carcinoma and one glioma) showed an adaptive response which was dependent on pulse size and interval.

CONCLUSION

The data show that an adaptive response can occur in human cells and that it can vary among cell lines. In addition, PDR sequences also produced an adaptive response which could have an affect on PDR therapy if such a response is found in tissues.

Improved local control for early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma--a tale of two hospitals

PURPOSE

To study the efficacy of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICT) in early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All early T-stage (T1 and T2 nasal cavity tumour) NPC treated with a curative intent up to 1996 were analyzed (n=743), 163 from the Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH) and 25 from Tuen Mun Hospital (TMH) were given ICT after radical external radiotherapy (ERT; group A). They were compared with 555 patients treated with ERT alone (group B). The radiotherapy techniques were identical between the two hospitals. The ERT delivered the tumoricidal dose (uncorrected biological equivalent dose (BED)-10, > or = 75 Gy) to the primary tumour, and this did not differ in technique or dosage between the two groups. The ICT delivered a dose of 18-24 Gy in three fractions over 15 days to a point 1 cm perpendicular to the midpoint of the plane of the sources.

RESULTS

The local failure was significantly less (crude rates, 6.9 vs. 13.0%; 5-year actuarial rates, 5.8 vs. 11.7%) and the disease-specific mortality was significantly lower (crude rates, 13.8 vs. 18.9%; 5-year actuarial rates, 12.2 vs. 15.2%) in group A compared with group B. ICT was the only significant independent prognostic factor predictive of fewer local failures. When ICT was excluded from the Cox regression model, the total physical dose or the total BED-10 uncorrected for tumour repopulation became significant in predicting the ultimate local failure rate. The two groups were comparable in the rate of the chronic radiation complications. A significant dose-tumour-control relationship existed, plotting the local failure as a function of the total physical dose or the total BED.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementing ERT, which delivered the tumoricidal dose (uncorrected BED-10, > or = 75 Gy), with ICT significantly enhanced ultimate local control in early T-stage (T1/T2 nasal infiltration) NPC. A significant dose-tumour-control relationship exists above the conventional tumoricidal dose level.