Integrating radiotherapy into bone marrow transplantation programs for Hodgkin's disease

Long-term follow-up of salvage radiotherapy in Hodgkin’s lymphoma after chemotherapy failure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term results of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for Hodgkin's lymphoma after chemotherapy failure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed 81 patients undergoing SRT for persistent or recurrent Hodgkin's lymphoma after chemotherapy; 19 also received conventional-dose salvage chemotherapy.

RESULTS

At SRT, the median patient age was 31 years. Of the 81 patients, 81% had Stage I-II, 25.9% had B symptoms, 14.8% had bulky disease, and 7.4% had extranodal disease. A less than a complete response (CR) to the last chemotherapy regimen occurred in 47%. SRT was generally limited to one side of the diaphragm, and the median dose was 36 Gy. After SRT, 75% of patients achieved a CR, with 82% retaining durable in-field control. In-field failure was associated with less than a CR to the last chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.0287). Most failures were at distant sites, with 60% in previously involved sites. The 10-year freedom from treatment failure and overall survival rates were 32.8% and 45.7%, respectively. The adverse prognostic factors for freedom from treatment failure were age >50 years (p < 0.001), B symptoms (p < 0.001), extranodal disease (p = 0.012), and less than a CR to the last chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.001). The adverse prognostic factors for overall survival were male gender (p = 0.034), age >50 years (p < 0.001), B symptoms (p = 0.002), and less than a CR to the last chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.002). Favorable cohorts had a 10-year freedom from treatment failure rate of 51% and overall survival rate of 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage radiotherapy is effective for selected patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma after chemotherapy failure and should be considered for incorporation into salvage programs.

Refractory or Relapsed Hodgkin??s Disease and Non-Hodgkin??s Lymphoma

This study assessed efficacy, optimal dosage and timing, and toxicity of involved-field radiotherapy used in conjunction with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for patients with refractory/relapsed Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

306 patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were analyzed. Forty-one patients underwent involved-field radiotherapy in conjunction with high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation. Thirty-three patients received involved-field radiotherapy prior to stem cell transplantation directed at symptomatic and/or bulky sites; eight patients received involved-field radiotherapy after stem cell transplantation directed at sites of persistent disease. The other 265 patients with refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease received high-dose chemotherapy/stem cell transplantation, but not involved-field radiotherapy. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the risk of death among patients treated with stem cell transplantation compared with that among patients treated with stem cell transplantation and involved-field radiotherapy.

RESULTS

There were 124 deaths during the follow-up period, including 17% of the patients treated with involved-field radiotherapy and 44.2% of the patients receiving chemotherapy without involved-field radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis found that patients who did not receive involved-field radiotherapy were 2.09 times more likely to die during the follow-up period than patients who received involved-field radiotherapy (P = 0.066; adjusted for age, stem cell transplantation type, stage I/II vs stage III/IV, refractory vs relapsed, and Hodgkin's disease vs non-Hodgkin's lymphoma). When patients were treated with involved-field radiotherapy prior to stem cell transplantation, 27 (79.4%) of the 34 patients achieved local control; when involved-field radiotherapy followed stem cell transplantation, 6 (85.7%) of the 7 patients experienced local control. Timing of involved-field radiotherapy prior to or following stem cell transplantation did not affect patient survival. Five of the 41 patients treated with involved-field radiotherapy developed toxicity subsequent to treatment. All but one of these patients had been treated with doses greater than 30 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although of borderline significance in this small sample, results of this study suggest that patients who receive involved-field radiotherapy in conjunction with stem cell transplantation may have increased survival when compared with patients who do not receive involved-field radiotherapy. Further follow-up of this cohort is necessary to confirm these findings.

Optimal scheduling to reduce morbidity of involved field radiotherapy with transplantation for lymphomas: A Prospective Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group Study

This study evaluated delivery of involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) with transplantation for lymphomas timed to minimise toxicity. Patients transplanted for lymphoma had infradiaphragmatic disease irradiated pre-transplant and supradiaphragmatic disease post transplant. A total of 31 patients were studied, with a median follow-up duration of 4 years. Transplant conditioning was according to clinician preference. In all, 14 patients had pre-transplant abdominopelvic IFRT and 19 had post transplant IFRT (including three who had pre-transplant IFRT). Grade III-IV haematological toxicity from pre-transplant IFRT occurred in three patients and from post transplant IFRT in 10 patients. Pre-transplant IFRT had no effect on haematological recovery post transplant, but was associated with a trend towards increased gastrointestinal toxicity (P = 0.094). Pneumonitis due to post transplant thoracic IFRT occurred in one patient. Two patients failed in involved sites after completion of protocol radiotherapy. One case of myelodysplasia has been reported. As sequenced in this study, IFRT was feasible and produced a low incidence of severe pulmonary and haematological toxicities. Patient selection, field size and radiotherapy dose warrant further study.

Effectiveness of high dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with biopsy-proven primary refractory Hodgkin's disease

Prospective randomized studies have determined that high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for patients with chemosensitive relapsed Hodgkin's disease (HD); however, the role of this approach in patients with primary refractory disease has been controversial. This report is an integrated analysis of 75 consecutive patients with biopsy-confirmed primary refractory HD, who were treated with high dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) and ASCT at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The patients underwent conventional dose cytoreductive chemotherapy followed by HDT and ASCT. At a median follow-up of 10 years for surviving patients, the event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 45%, 49% and 48% respectively. Only chemosensitivity to standard-dose second-line chemotherapy (SDSC) predicted for a better survival, thus responding patients had an EFS, PFS and OS of 60%, 62% and 66%, respectively, versus 19%, 23% and 17% for patients who had a poor response to SDSC (P < 0.001). While patients with chemosensitive disease have an excellent outcome with HDT and ASCT, novel approaches are needed to cure HD patients who fail front-line and second-line chemotherapy.

Changing role and decreasing size: current trends in radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease

Radiotherapy, the first cancer treatment modality that offered cure, is still considered to be the most effective "single agent" in treating Hodgkin's disease (HD). Yet, the role of radiotherapy in HD has changed dramatically with the advent of effective combination chemotherapy and the rising concern of long-term complications associated with successful treatment of HD. The new principles of integrating radiotherapy into a combined-modality regimen for HD at different prognostic stages are reviewed here, along with the effect of this new role on radiation field size and design.

What is the optimal treatment volume in Hodgkin's disease patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy?

To determine the optimal treatment volume in Hodgkin's disease patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and radiation therapy (RT), failure sites were reviewed in 56 patients. Twenty-one (38%) received involved-field RT (IFRT) before or after HDCT encompassing sites of prior disease. Failure sites were designated as previously involved (old) or uninvolved (new) sites. Seven patients (12%) died in the immediate post-HDCT period, leaving 49 evaluable (median follow-up, 41 months). Twenty-five patients (51%) relapsed (14 HDCT, 11 HDCT + IFRT): seven (28%) in old, eight (32%) in new, and ten (40%) in old and new sites. Six of the seven who relapsed in old sites received HDCT alone, whereas seven of the eight who relapsed in new sites received IFRT. Relapse in old sites was particularly common in patients failing to achieve a complete response. The most common new failure site was nodal, occurring in 11 patients and was primarily (10/11) adjacent to an old site. Although it controls prior disease, IFRT is insufficient in Hodgkin's disease patients undergoing HDCT. Relapse is common in new nodal sites and is primarily adjacent to prior sites. These results suggest that extended-field RT encompassing old and adjacent uninvolved nodal sites may be the optimal treatment volume in these patients.

Thoracic radiation therapy before autologous bone marrow transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease. PMH Lymphoma Group, and the Toronto Autologous BMT Group

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between radiation therapy (RT) and treatment-related mortality in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for recurrent/refractory Hodgkin's disease (HD). Between December 1986 and December 1992, 59 patients previously treated at the Princess Margaret Hospital underwent HDCT (etoposide 60 mg/kg, melphalan 160 mg/m2) and ABMT, performed for refractory (13 patients) or relapsed (46 patients) HD. RT was incorporated in the salvage treatment with the intent to achieve complete control of disease prior to ABMT. RT was given before ABMT in 33 patients, and after ABMT in 4 patients. Treatment-related (TR) mortality was defined as any death occurring within 100 days of ABMT. Autopsies were performed for all patients with TR deaths. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years (range 1.2-7.4 years), the actuarial overall survival was 41% +/- 14% at 5 years. We observed 37 deaths, and 10 of these were TR deaths. Among the 24 patients who received thoracic RT before ABMT, there were 8 TR deaths, 3 of these solely attributable to radiation pneumonitis. The remaining 5 TR deaths all had respiratory failure with complicating sepsis as a major medical problem. The interval from RT to ABMT was shorter for 8 patients dying of TR death (mean 37 days; range 0-103 days), than for the 16 survivors (mean 105 days; range 0-263 days) (P = 0.026). Among 9 patients with ABMT within 50 days of thoracic RT, 6 had TR death. In contrast, among the 35 patients without thoracic RT (26 no RT, 9 non-thoracic RT), there were only 2 TR deaths. The 4 patients treated with mantle RT post-ABMT had no serious pulmonary complications. The use of thoracic RT before HDCT and ABMT was associated with a high post-transplant mortality rate. It was most evident in patients who received thoracic RT within 50 days prior to ABMT, or when the target volume included large volume of lung. We recommend that the use of post-transplant RT be investigated to decrease TR mortality.

Radiation myelopathy following transplantation and radiotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Combined modality therapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy has become increasingly popular in the management of solid malignancies. However, unexpected toxicities may arise from their interactions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We report the case of a young woman with a large mediastinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation and involved field radiotherapy, and who developed radiation myelopathy after a latent period of only 3 months. The spinal cord dose did not exceed 40.3 Gy in 22 fractions over 4.5 weeks, which is well within accepted tolerance limits. She had no other identifiable risk factors for radiation myelopathy, suggesting an adverse drug-radiation interaction as the most likely cause of her injury.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This represents the first report of radiation myelopathy at accepted safe radiation doses following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation, and we recommend caution in the choice of radiotherapeutic dose in this setting.

High dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: pattern of failure and implications for involved-field radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the pattern of failure and outcome of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell rescue (SCR) with an emphasis on the role of adjuvant involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Fifty-three adult patients with aggressive NHL (46 intermediate-and 7 high-grade) underwent HDCT with SCR. All patients underwent induction chemotherapy prior to high dose intensification. Seven (13.2%) received IFRT to 10 disease sites either prior to or following HDCT. Indication included symptomatic or bulky disease, persistent disease, or to consolidate a complete response (CR). Sites of relapse were designated as old (involved prior to HDCT) or new (previously uninvolved). Median followup was 20.1 months (range, 1.2-69.3 months).

RESULTS

The 4-year actuarial progression-free (PFS) and cause-specific (CSS) survivals of the entire group were 30.0 and 50.2%, respectively. Excluding toxic deaths, 24 patients (52.2%) relapsed. Sixteen (34.7%) failed in old and 15 (32.6%) in new sites. Patients treated with IFRT had a lower rate of relapse in old sites (0 vs. 41%) (p = 0.04) than patients treated with HDCT alone. Of the 141 sites present prior to induction, 127 (90.1%) were amenable to IFRT. Excluding irradiated sites, the overall 4-year local control (LC) of all amenable sites was 61.1%. Amenable sites failing to achieve a CR to induction had a poorer LC (32.0 vs. 95.1%) (p < 0.0001) than sites in CR. The 4-year LC of sites failing to achieve a CR to HDCT was 29.4%. Adjuvant IFRT improved the 4-year LC of all sites (100 vs. 61.1%) (p = 0.05), persistent sites following induction (100 vs. 32.0%) (p = 0.01) and persistent sites following HDCT (100 vs. 29.4%) (p = 0.01). Adjuvant IFRT was not associated with any untoward acute or late toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The predominant site of relapse in patients with aggressive NHL undergoing HDCT and SCR is in sites of disease present prior to HDCT. However, the risk of relapse of prior disease sites varies greatly depending upon their response to chemotherapy. Sites at greatest risk are those failing to achieve a CR to induction regardless of their response to HDCT. IFRT is capable of reducing the high risk of relapse in these sites, the majority of which are amenable to IFRT. These results demonstrate a rationale for and possible benefit to IFRT in patients with aggressive NHL undergoing HDCT and SCR.

Salvage radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease following chemotherapy failure

PURPOSE

This study aims to: 1) assess failure-free survival (FFS), overall survival (OS), and failure pattern after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) who fail chemotherapy (CT); 2) identify patients suitable for SRT as an alternative to more aggressive salvage regimens.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1978 and 1992, 52 patients with relapsed/refractory HD following 26 CT received SRT at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute. Patient characteristics at diagnosis were: median age (range 12-63); male-31, female-21; Stage I-4, II-16, III-25, or IV-7. Prior to SRT 27 patients had received the equivalent of both MOPP and ABV(D). The duration of initial complete response (CR) from CT was greater than 12 months in 22 patients. SRT (dose 34-42 Gy) was given to active disease sites.

RESULTS

Five-year FFS and OS rates following SRT were 26 and 57%, respectively. Five-year FFS and OS rates of 36 and 75%, respectively, were achieved in patients who relapsed in supradiaphragmatic nodal sites without B symptoms; in a subset of patients with initial Stage I-II disease the FFS and OS rates were 50 and 86%, respectively. On multivariate analysis significant factors for FFS were B symptoms at the time of SRT (p = 0.003), extranodal involvement (p = 0.011) and histology (p = 0.018). For OS significant factors were B symptoms (p = 0.0007), age (p = 0.014) and number of prior CT regimens (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The relatively poor results of SRT in terms of FFS justify the use of alternative salvage strategies for most patients with Hodgkin's disease who fail CT. However, SRT offers a low morbidity, potentially curative option for a subset of patients. Our data suggest that patients most suitable for SRT are those with relapse in supradiaphragmatic nodal sites and no B symptoms.