103Pd brachytherapy and external beam irradiation for clinically localized, high-risk prostatic carcinoma

Fiducial Markers Implanted during Prostate Brachytherapy for Guiding Conformal External Beam Radiation Therapy

Prostate movement imposes limits on safe dose-escalation with external beam radiation therapy. If the precise daily location of the prostate is known, dose escalation becomes more feasible. We have developed an approach to dose escalation using a combination of prostate brachytherapy followed by external beam radiation therapy in which fiducial markers are placed along with125 I seeds during transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. These markers serve to verify daily prostate location during the subsequent external beam radiotherapy. Prior to implementing this approach, preliminary studies were performed to test visibility of the markers. Three different125 I seed models, as well as gold and silver marker seeds were placed within tissue-equivalent phantoms. Images were obtained with conventional x-rays (75–85 kV) and 6 MV photons from a linear accelerator. All125 I seed models were clearly visible on conventional x-rays but none were seen with 6 MV photons. The gold markers were visible with both energies. The silver markers were visible with conventional x-rays and 6 MV x-rays, but not as clearly as the gold seeds at 6 MV. Subsequently, conventional x-rays, CT scans, and 6 MV port films were obtained in 29 patients in whom fiducial gold marker seeds were implanted into the prostate during125 I prostate brachytherapy. To address the possibility of “seed migration” within the prostate, CT scans were repeated 5 weeks apart in 14 patients and relative positions of the gold seeds were evaluated. The repeated CT scans showed no change in intraprostatic gold marker location, suggesting minimal migration. The gold seeds were visible with conventional x-rays, CT, and 6 MV port films in all patients. During the course of external beam radiation therapy, the gold markers were visible on routine 6 MV port films and were seen in different locations from film to film suggesting prostate motion. Mean daily displacement was 4–5 mm in the anterior-posterior, and 4–5 mm in superior-inferior dimensions. Left-right displacement appeared less, averaging 2–3 mm. We conclude that implantation of gold marker seeds during prostate brachytherapy represents an easily implemented and practical means of prostate localization during subsequent image-guided external beam radiotherapy. With such markers, conformality of the external beam component can be confidently improved without expensive new equipment.

Difference in the rate of rectal complications following prostate brachytherapy based on the prostate-rectum distance and the prostate longitudinal length among early prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the difference in rectal complications rate following prostate low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy based on prostate-rectum distance and prostate longitudinal length among early prostate cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2008 to February 2013, 245 prostate cancer patients with a Gleason score ≤7 were treated with 125-I LDR brachytherapy. Among them, 178 patients with prostate volume 20-35 mL and a follow-up period ≥6 months were evaluated for radiation proctitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed for a prebrachytherapy evaluation, and prostate-rectum distance and prostate longitudinal length were measured. The radiation proctitis was confirmed and graded via colonoscopy based on the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) toxicity criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients received a colonoscopy for proctitis evaluation, and 12 were identified as grade 1 on the RTOG scale. Nine patients were diagnosed as grade 2 and 2 patients were grade 3. No patient developed grade 4 proctitis. The rectal-complication group had a mean prostate-rectum distance of 2.51±0.16 mm, while non-rectal-complication control group had 3.32±0.31 mm. The grade 1 proctitis patients had a mean prostate-rectum distance of 2.80±0.15 mm, which was significantly longer than 2.12±0.31 mm of grades 2 and 3 patient groups (p=0.045). All 11 patients of grades 2 and 3 had a prostate longitudinal length of 35.22±2.50 mm, which was longer than group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.214).

CONCLUSIONS

As the prostate-rectum distance increased, fewer postimplantation rectal symptoms were observed. Patients with a shorter prostate-rectum distance in MRI should receive modified implantation techniques or radical prostatectomy.

Penile Rehabilitation Strategies Among Prostate Cancer Survivors

Despite advances in technical and surgical approaches, erectile dysfunction (ED) remains the most common complication among prostate cancer survivors, adversely impacting quality of life. This article analyzes the concept and rationale of ED rehabilitation programs in prostate cancer patients. Emphasis is placed on the pathophysiology of ED after diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer to understand the efficacy of rehabilitation programs in clinical practice. Available evidence shows that ED is a transient complication following prostate biopsy and cancer diagnosis, with no evidence to support rehabilitation programs in these patients. A small increase in ED and in the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors was reported in patients under active surveillance. Patients should be advised that active surveillance is unlikely to severely affect erectile function, but clinically significant changes in sexual function are possible. Focal therapy could be an intermediate option for patients demanding treatment/refusing active surveillance and invested in maintaining sexual activity. Unlike radical prostatectomy, there is no support for PDE5 inhibitor use to prevent ED after highly conformal external radiotherapy or low-dose rate brachytherapy. Despite progress in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for ED in prostate cancer patients, the success rates of rehabilitation programs remain low in clinical practice. Alternative strategies to prevent ED appear warranted, with attention toward neuromodulation, nerve grafting, nerve preservation, stem cell therapy, investigation of neuroprotective interventions, and further refinements of radiotherapy dosing and delivery methods.

Role of isotope selection in long-term outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the rates of long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) with respect to isotope in intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy.

METHODS

A total of 242 consecutive patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with iodine-125 ((125)I) or palladium-103 ((103)Pd) implants after EBRT (range 45.0-50.4 Gy) from 1996 to 2002. Of the 242 patients, 119 (49.2%) were treated with (125)I and 123 (50.8%) with (103)Pd. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze BRFS, defined according to the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL) with respect to Gleason score, stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, and source selection. Late genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicities were assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 10 years, the BRFS rate was 77.3%. A statistically significant difference was found in the 10-year BRFS rate between the (125)I- and (103)Pd-treated groups (82.7% and 70.6%, respectively; P = .001). The addition of hormonal therapy did not improve the 10-year BRFS rate (77.6%) compared with RT alone (77.1%; P = .22). However, a statistically significant difference in the BRFS rate was found with the addition of hormonal therapy to (103)Pd, improving the 10-year BRFS rate for (73.8%) compared with (103)Pd alone (69.1%; P = .008). On multivariate analysis, isotope type ((103)Pd vs (125)I), pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >10 ng/mL, and greater tumor stage increased the risk of recurrence by 2.6-fold (P = .007), 5.9-fold (P < .0001), and 1.7-fold (P = .14), respectively.

CONCLUSION

(125)I renders a superior rate of BRFS compared with (103)Pd when used with EBRT. Hormonal therapy does not provide additional benefit in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy, except for the addition of hormonal therapy to (103)Pd.

Timing of postseed imaging influences rectal dose-volume parameters for cesium-131 prostate seed implants

PURPOSE

To study the influence of timing of postseed implant imaging on rectal dose-volume parameters for cesium-131 ((131)Cs) seed prostate implants.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen patients were treated in our institution with combination (131)Cs brachytherapy followed by pelvic external beam radiation therapy for intermediate to high-risk prostate cancers. For all patients, CT scans were scheduled at 7 days (CT(7)) and again at 2 months for external beam radiation therapy simulation purpose (CT(60)) postseed implantation. Comprehensive postseed implant dosimetry was performed for both CT(7) and CT(60) scans. In each case, dose-volume histogram parameters, rectal separation (the distance between the center of posterior most seed and most anterior rectal wall), and posterior row activity (the total activity implanted within 2-4mm anterior to the posterior wall of the prostate) data were collected. The absolute rectal volumes receiving 100% and 110% prescription dose were also collected.

RESULTS

Rectal dose correlated strongly with rectal separation (p<0.001). The mean change in rectal separation between CT(7) and CT(60) scans was 1.1 (±1.7) mm, and the corresponding change in 0.1-cc rectal dose was 18 (±26.5) Gy. Posterior row activity did not correlate with rectal dose (p=0.51). The mean volume of rectum that receives between 100% and 110% of the prescription dose (RV(100) and RV(110)) increased twofold, between CT(7) and CT(60) evaluations (0.03 [±0.06] cc vs. 0.07 (±0.05) cc, respectively, p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has demonstrated that rectal doses after (131)Cs seed implants are influenced by the timing of postseed imaging. This may be a consequence of prostatic and periprostatic edema resolution.

Combining radiation therapy with interstitial radiation-inducible TNF-α expression for locoregional cancer treatment

Brachytherapy (BRT) is used in the treatment of human cancers, including the cervix, breast, prostate and head and neck cancers. The primary advantage of BRT lies in the spatial conformation of the radiation deposition. Previously, we have shown that similar techniques (using hollow metallic cylinders) may be used to deliver gene-therapy vectors capable of expressing the radiation-sensitizing cytokine, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, within a restricted volume of tissue. Herein, we report radiation sensitization of cancer cells using a TNF-α expressing vector driven by the radiation-inducible immediate-early gene-1 (IEX-1) promoter (pIEX-TNF-α). TNF-α, determined by ELISA assays using culture medium, increased between 5 and 10 fold, 48 h following exposure to radiation, and radiation sensitization was comparable with that observed in cells in which TNF-α was constitutively expressed under cytomegalo viral (CMV) promoter using the plasmid vector (pCMV-TNF-α). This efficiency of induced TNF-α radiation sensitization was also observed in cervix (SW756) and prostate tumor (PC-3) xenograft models. IEX-1-driven TNF-α expression following external radiation exposure resulted in enhanced regression of tumor xenografts as compared with radiation alone. A feasibility of using radioactive Pd-103 seeds with GeneSeeds was further examined using PC-3 xenograft models. The data showed substantial tumor growth suppression following co-implantation with a metal seed containing Pd-103. Taken together, these results show the enhanced effect on tumor regression by treatment with radiation-inducible TNF-α expression in combination with radiation and support for the IEX-1 promoter as a useful regulator for temporal activation of radiation-sensitizing gene expression.

Long-term outcomes for patients with prostate cancer having intermediate and high-risk disease, treated with combination external beam irradiation and brachytherapy

Background. Perception remains that brachytherapy-based regimens are inappropriate for patients having increased risk of extracapsular extension (ECE). Methods. 321 consecutive intermediate and high-risk disease patients were treated between 1/92 and 2/97 by one author (M. Dattoli) and stratified by NCCN guidelines. 157 had intermediate-risk; 164 had high-risk disease. All were treated using the combination EBRT/brachytherapy ± hormones. Biochemical failure was defined using PSA >0.2 and nadir +2 at last followup. Nonfailing patients followup was median 10.5 years. Both biochemical data and original biopsy slides were independently rereviewed at an outside institution. Results. Overall actuarial freedom from biochemical progression at 16 years was 82% (89% intermediate, 74% high-risk) with failure predictors: Gleason score (P = .01) and PSA (P = .03). Hormonal therapy did not affect failure rates (P = .14). Conclusion. This study helps to strengthen the rationale for brachytherapy-based regimens as being both durable and desirable treatment options for such patients. Prospective studies are justified to confirm these positive results.

Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with intensity modulated brachytherapy or EBRT for prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

Rectal toxicity remains a serious complication affecting quality of life for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. We began an investigational trial injecting hyaluronic acid (HA) in the perirectal fat to increase the distance between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall. This is the first report using HA injection in oncology.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a trial of external beam radiation therapy with HDR brachytherapy boosts in prostate cancer. During the two high-dose-rate (HDR) fractions, thermoluminescent dosimeter dosimeters were placed in the urethra and in the rectum. Before the second HDR fraction, 3-7 mL (mean, 6 mL) of HA was injected under transrectal ultrasound guidance in the perirectal fat to systematically create a 1.5-cm space. Urethral and rectal HDR doses were calculated and measured. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the stability of the new space.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled in the study. No toxicity was produced from the HA or the injection. In follow-up computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, the HA injection did not migrate or change in mass/shape for close to 1 year. The mean distance between rectum and prostate was 2.0 cm along the entire length of the prostate. The median measured rectal dose, when normalized to the median urethral dose, demonstrated a decrease in dose from 47.1% to 39.2% (p < 0.001) with or without injection. For an HDR boost dose of 1150 cGy, the rectum mean Dmax reduction was from 708 cGy to 507 cGy, p < 0.001, and the rectum mean Dmean drop was from 608 to 442 cGy, p < 0.001 post-HA injection.

CONCLUSION

The new 2-cm distance derived from the HA injection significantly decreased rectal dose in HDR brachytherapy. Because of the several-month duration of stability, the same distance was maintained during the course of external beam radiation therapy.

Long-term results of interstitial brachytherapy (LDR-Brachytherapy) in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer

Permanent interstitial brachytherapy represents the most conformal form of radiation therapy of the prostate and the number of patients with prostate cancers treated with permanent radioactive implants is increasing world wide. In the meanwhile long-term data on tumor control and treatment morbidity become available. Biochemical and clinical tumor control appears to be as effective as after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy in early prostate cancer. The risk of postreatment urinary incontinence and bowel dysfunction is low and erectile function can be preserved in the majority of patients. However, prostate brachytherapy requires a careful selection of patients as pretreatment factors predict for long-term outcome. The need for combined modality approaches in intermediate and high-risk patients remains controversely discussed. The continous refinement of intraoperative planning techniques and the elucidation of the etiology of urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction should result in further improvements in biochemical outcomes and decreased morbidity. Improved and standardized postimplantation evaluation will make outcome data more reliable and comparable.

Is seminal vesicle implantation with permanent sources possible? A dose–volume histogram analysis in patients undergoing combined 103Pd implantation and external beam radiation for T3c prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Combined brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) is evolving as a successful treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis of the SV was performed in patients with biopsy-positive SV who received implantation of the SV and prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen consecutive patients with high-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > or =10 ng/mL, Gleason score > or = 7, or clinical stage > or = T2b) and a positive SV biopsy were treated with a 103Pd implant of the prostate and SV followed by 45Gy of EBRT. DVHs were generated for the prostate and total SV volume (SVT). In addition, the SV was divided into 3-mm-thick volumes identified as SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 starting from the junction of the prostate and SV and extending distally. Delivered dose was defined as the D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the organ on DVH).

RESULTS

The median number of seeds implanted into the prostate and the SVT was 59 (41-94) and 9 (4-21), respectively. The median D90 values for the prostate, SVT, SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 were 103.2 (87.4-137.1), 46.2 (4.0-69.4), 76.0 (31.2-147), 63.4 (25.1-145.9), 49.7 (15.3-118), 27.4 (9.3-135.1), 14.2 (2.3-100.3), and 3.9 (0-61.5) Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the SV using a real-time intraoperative approach is technically feasible and results in higher doses to the SV than has been reported with implantation of the prostate alone. Although dose distribution in the SV can be variable and unpredictable, these doses, in combination with 45 Gy of EBRT, may be adequate to control disease spread in these organs.

Biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) relapse-free survival and toxicity after125I low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

To report our clinical experience and 5-year prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival rate for early-stage prostate cancer after (125)I low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 300 patients were treated between March 1999 and April 2003, and followed prospectively. Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, and those receiving neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) or not. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PSA relapse-free survival and PSA nadirs were obtained for all patients and for the risk groups. Toxicity, as urinary and erectile dysfunction (ED), were reported from a prospective database.

RESULTS

The median (range) follow-up was 45 (33-82) months. The actuarial PSA relapse-free survival was 93% at 5 years; 21 (7%) of patients had evidence of biochemical failure as defined by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology criteria. There was no significant difference in actuarial survival for patients in the different risk groups, or between those receiving NAAD or not (low-risk 96%, intermediate 89%, high 93%, P = 0.12; NAAD 92%, no NAAD 95%, P = 0.30). Overall the 3-year median PSA level was 0.3 ng/mL (192 men). There was no significant difference in median 3-year PSA levels for different risk groups, or for those treated with or with no NAAD. The 3- and 4-year PSA nadir of <0.5 ng/mL was achieved by 71% and 86% of men, respectively. The acute urinary retention rate was 7%; 5.6% of men developed urethral strictures requiring dilatation, while 2.7% required a transurethral resection of the prostate after implantation, for obstructive symptoms. Of patients with no ED before treatment, 62% had no ED at 2 years, and of these 60% used a phosphodiesterase inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

This prospective series confirms the excellent overall biochemical survival after (125)I brachytherapy; the treatment was tolerated well, with early and late urinary toxicity and ED similar to other published results.

Case-Matched comparison of contemporary radiation therapy to surgery in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Few studies critically compare current radiotherapy techniques to surgery for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, despite an urgent need to determine which approach offers superior cancer control. Our objective was to compare rates of biochemical relapse-free survival (BFS) and surrogates of disease specific survival among men with high risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate as a function of treatment modality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective data from 409 men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or =10 or Gleason 7-10 or Stage > or =T2b cancer treated uniformly at one university between March 1988 and December 2000 were analyzed. Patients had undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy implant alone (BTM), or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy boost with short-term neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (BTC). From the total study population a 1:1 matched-cohort analysis (208 patients matched via prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score) comparing RP with BTC was performed as well.

RESULTS

Estimated 4-year BFS rates were superior for patients treated with BTC (BTC 72%, BTM 25%, RP 53%; p < 0.001). Matched analysis of BTC vs. RP confirmed these results (BTC 73%, BTM 55%; p = 0.010). Relative risk (RR) of biochemical relapse for BTM and BTC compared with RP were 2.92 (1.95-4.36) and 0.56 (0.36-0.87), (p < 0.001, p = 0.010). RR for BTC from the matched cohort analysis was 0.44 (0.26-0.74; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk prostate cancer patients receiving multimodality radiation therapy (BTC) display apparently superior BFS compared with those receiving surgery (RP) or brachytherapy alone (BTM).

Cancer of the prostate

Prostate carcinoma, with about 190,000 new cases occurring each year (15% of all cancers in men), is the most frequent cancer among men in northern and western Europe. Causes of the disease are essentially unknown, although hormonal factors are involved, and diet may exert an indirect influence; some genes, potentially involved in hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) have been identified. A suspect of prostate cancer may derive from elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) finding. For a definitive diagnosis, however, a positive prostate biopsy is requested. Treatment strategy is defined according to initial PSA stage, and grade of the disease and age and general conditions of the patient. In localized disease, watchful waiting is indicated as primary option in patients with well or moderately differentiated tumours and a life expectancy <10 years, while radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy (with or without hormone-therapy) could be appropriate choices in the remaining cases. Hormone-therapy is the treatment of choice, combined with radiotherapy, for locally advanced or bulky disease and is effective, but not curative, in 80-85% of the cases of advanced disease. Patients who develop a hormone-refractory prostate cancer disease (HRPC) have to be evaluated for chemotherapy because of the recent demonstration of improved overall survival (2-2.5 months) and quality of life with docetaxel in more than 1,600 cases.

Quality assurance of HDR prostate plans: Program implementation at a community hospital

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is currently the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States, and the second leading cause of cancer mortality. The utilization of radiation therapy is regarded as the definitive local therapy of choice for intermediate- and high-risk disease, in which there is increased risk for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or regional node involvement. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a logical treatment modality to deliver the boost dose to an external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment to increase local control rates. From a treatment perspective, the utilization of a complicated treatment delivery system, the compressed time frame in which the procedure is performed, and the small number of large dose fractions make the implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program imperative. One aspect of this program is the QA of the HDR treatment plan. Review of regulatory and medical physics professional publications shows that substantial general guidance is available. We provide some insight to the implementation of an HDR prostate plan program at a community hospital. One aspect addressed is the utilization of the low-dose-rate (LDR) planning system and the use of existing ultrasound image sets to familiarize the radiation therapy team with respect to acceptable HDR implant geometries. Additionally, the use of the LDR treatment planning system provided a means to prospectively determine the relationship between the treated isodose volume and the product of activity and time for the department's planning protocol prior to the first HDR implant. For the first 12 HDR prostate implants, the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation was 3.05% between the predicted product of activity and time vs. the actual plan values. Retrospective re-evaluation of the actual implant data reduced the RMS deviation to 2.36%.

Acute urinary morbidity following I-125 prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

In Japan, iodine-125 (I-125) prostate brachytherapy has been legally approved since July 2003, and this method is becoming more popular. The purpose of the present study was to assess acute urinary morbidity within the first 6 months after I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS

A group of 130 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer was treated with I-125 prostate brachytherapy between September 2003 and June 2004,either alone (monotherapy; 66 patients) or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy (combined therapy; 64 patients). Urinary morbidity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 111 patients (85.4%) developed some degree of urinary symptoms such as frequency, retention, dysuria, incontinence, or hematuria. Urinary frequency (73.1%) and retention (66.9%) were the most common, and showed no significant differences between the monotherapy group and combined therapy group (P = 0.352 and P = 0.630, respectively). Six patients (4.6%) required catheterization for urinary obstruction; the median time to onset was 1.5 days (range, 1-192 days). Five of these 6 patients received monotherapy and the other received combined therapy.

CONCLUSION

Manifestations of acute urinary morbidity, especially frequency and retention, are relatively common but acceptable events after I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

192Ir or 125I prostate brachytherapy as a boost to external beam radiotherapy in locally advanced prostatic cancer: a dosimetric point of view

PURPOSE

This work aims at comparing the dosimetric possibilities of 125I or 192Ir prostate brachytherapy (Bt) as a boost to external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1/1997 to 12/2002, 260 patients were treated. Until 12/2001 a low dose rate (LDR) treatment with 192Ir wires was used, later replaced by a high dose rate (HDR) delivered with an 192Ir stepping source technology. For the present work, we selected 40 patients including the last 20 treated, respectively, by LDR and HDR. The planning CT Scans of all these 40 patients were transferred into the 3D Prowess system for 125I permanent implants design according to the Seattle method. The reference data for dosimetric comparisons were the V100 and the prescribed dose for 192Ir as well as the dose delivered with 125I techniques to the 192Ir V100. We compared V100-150 data as well as doses to the organs at risks (OR) and cold spots (CS).

RESULTS

The V100 is 85.3+/-8% for 192Ir LDR and 96+/-2% for HDR techniques (P < 0.0001). In comparison with 125I, the 192Ir LDR mode induces higher hyperdosage volumes inside the CTV but also more CS, while maximal doses to urethra and rectum are, respectively, 17 and 39% less with 125I (P < 0.0001). In comparison with the 192Ir HDR mode, 125I Bt induces higher hyperdosage volumes and slightly more CS deliberately planned around the bladder neck. If delivered doses to urethra are identical, those to the 20% anterior part of the rectum are 33% less with 125I (P < 0,0001). The 125I Bt technique was only possible in 24 out of the 40 patients studied due to pelvic bone arch interference.

CONCLUSIONS

At the present time, there is no evident dosimetric superiority of one Bt method when all the criteria are taken into account. However, improving Bt techniques to implant any prostatic size could found the superiority of the 125I or permanent implants. 125I indeed allows large hyperdosage volumes inside the CTV in comparison with 192Ir HDR techniques while lowering doses to OR and minimizing CS.

High dose brachytherapy (real time) in patients with intermediate-or high-risk prostate cancer: technical description and preliminary experience

INTRODUCTION

It has been well documented that the outcome of prostate cancer treatment depends on the dose administered. Hence, techniques have been developed that allow high-dose administration without increasing the complications, e.g. external radiotherapy combined with high-dose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy. In this article we analyse the technique and protocol of real-time HDR brachytherapy together with the preliminary results that support its use. Materials and methods. Between June 1998 and December 2004, 100 patients with adenoma of the prostate were treated with 46 Gy of external irradiation to the pelvis and 2 HDR brachytherapy fractions (each of 1150 cGy) at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of a 5-week radiotherapy course. The 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) system was used to establish disease stage. Patients with intermediate-risk (PSA 10-20 ng/ml or Gleason = 7 or T2c) and high-risk (two intermediate risk factors or PSA > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 7 or > T2c) without metastases were eligible for the brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus panel statement. SPSS statistical package was used to quantify survival (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicity was scored according to RTOG guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 49-78). Clinical stage was T2a in 22% of the patients, 26% T2b and 52% T3. Initial PSA was = 10 ng/ml in 22% of the patients and > 10 ng/ml in 78%. Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 12-79). The 5-year overall survival and actuarial biochemical control were 99% and 87% respectively. No chronic severe complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The good results of local control, disease-free survival and few complications that the external radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy have shown suggest that the method should be considered as first-choice in the treatment of prostate tumours of high- and intermediate-risk.

The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Technologic advances in radiation treatment planning and delivery have generated popular interest in the different radiation therapy techniques used in treating patients with localized prostate cancer. Throughout the past decade, high-energy (> 4 MV) linear accelerators have largely replaced Cobalt machines in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivery. Conventional EBRT has been used to treat prostate cancer successfully since the 1950s. By switching to computed tomography-based planning, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy provides better relative conformality of dose than does conventional EBRT. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has further refined dose conformality by spreading the low-dose region to a larger volume. However, the potential long-term risks of larger volumes of normal tissues receiving low doses of radiation in IMRT are unknown. Particle-beam radiation therapy offers unique dose distributions and characteristics with higher relative biologic effect and linear energy transfer. Transperineal prostate brachytherapy offers the shortest treatment time with equivalent efficacy without significant risk of radiation exposure. The addition of hormonal therapy to radiation therapy has been shown to improve the outcome of radiation therapy.

ATM sequence variants are predictive of adverse radiotherapy response among patients treated for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To examine whether the presence of sequence variants in the ATM (mutated in ataxia-telangiectasia) gene is predictive for the development of radiation-induced adverse responses resulting from (125)I prostate brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up who underwent (125)I prostate brachytherapy of early-stage prostate cancer were screened for DNA sequence variations in all 62 coding exons of the ATM gene using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. The clinical course and postimplant dosimetry for each genetically characterized patient were obtained from a database of 2,020 patients implanted at Mount Sinai Hospital after 1990.

RESULTS

Twenty-one ATM sequence alterations located within exons, or in short intronic regions flanking each exon, were found in 16 of the 37 patients screened. For this group, 10 of 16 (63%) exhibited at least one form of adverse response. In contrast, of the 21 patients who did not harbor an ATM sequence variation, only 3 of 21 (14%) manifested radiation-induced adverse responses (p = 0.005). Nine of the patients with sequence alterations specifically possessed missense mutations, which encode for amino acid substitutions and are therefore more likely to possess functional importance. For this group, 7 of 9 (78%) exhibited at least one form of adverse response. In contrast, of the 28 patients who did not have a missense alteration, only 6 of 28 (21%) manifested any form of adverse response to the radiotherapy (p = 0.004). Of the patients with missense variants, 5 of 9 (56%) exhibited late rectal bleeding vs. 1 of 28 (4%) without such alterations (p = 0.002). Of those patients who were at risk for developing erectile dysfunction, 5 of 8 (63%) patients with missense mutations developed prospectively evaluated erectile dysfunction as opposed to 2 of 20 (10%) without these sequence alterations (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Possession of sequence variants in the ATM gene, particularly those that encode for an amino acid substitution, is predictive for the development of adverse radiotherapy responses among patients treated with (125)I prostate brachytherapy.

Does inverse planning applied to Iridium192 high dose rate prostate brachytherapy improve the optimization of the dose afforded by the Paris system?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of the work is to analyse for 192Ir prostate brachytherapy (BT) some of the different steps in optimizing the dose delivered to the CTV, urethra and rectum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 07/1998 and 12/2001, 166 patients were treated with 192Ir wires providing a low dose rate, according to the Paris system philosophy and with the 2D version of the treatment planning IsisR. 40-45 Gy were delivered after an external beam radiotherapy of 40 Gy. The maximum tolerable doses for BT were 25 Gy to the anterior third of the rectum on the whole length of the implant (R dose) and 52 Gy to the urethra on a 1cm length (Umax). A Umax/CTV dose ratio >1.3 represented a pejorative value as the planned dose of 40-45 Gy could not be achieved. On the other side a ratio <or=1.25 was considered optimal and the intermediate values satisfactory. A R/CTV dose ratio <0.55 which is easily obtained was also stated as an optimal situation. From the CT Scan images performed for these implants, a theoretical study investigated the possibilities of complementary optimization afforded by a 3D treatment planning. This work was based on an inverse planning philosophy and a stepping source technology (SST) for high dose rate 192Ir sources.

RESULTS

At the end of a learning curve reaching a plateau after the first 71 patients, 90% of the implants with 192Ir wires were stated at least satisfactory for a total rate of 82% for the whole population. When the 3D dosimetry for SST was used, the initial values >1.25 decreased significantly with optimization required on CTV contours and additional constraints on urethra while the R/CTV ratio was maintained under 0.55. For initial Umax/CTV >1.3 or >1.25 but <or=1.3 indeed, the mean respective values of 1.41+/-0.16 and 1.28+/-0.01 decreased to 1.28+/-0.24 and 1.17+/-0.09 (P<0.001), allowing to increase the total dose to the CTV by 4 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The Paris system which assumes a homogeneous distribution of a minimum number of catheters inside the CTV allowed to anticipate a satisfactory dosimetry in 82% of cases. However, this precision rate could be improved until 95% with an optimization approach based on an inverse planning philosophy. These new 3D optimization methods, ideally based on good quality implants at first allow to deliver the highest doses with minimal probability of creating cold spots inside the CTV or unacceptable hot spots outside.

Combined external beam radiotherapy and Pd-103 brachytherapy boost improves biochemical failure free survival in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: results of a matched pair analysis

BACKGROUND

Dose escalation has resulted in improved biochemical control in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with conformal external beam radiation (EBRT). Conformal dose distributions may also be achieved with brachytherapy. Therefore, biochemical control was evaluated for patients treated with combined external radiation therapy and low dose rate brachytherapy (EBRT + LDR).

METHODS

A matched pair analysis was performed to compare biochemical control of patients treated with EBRT + LDR to patients treated with EBRT alone. The study endpoints were biochemical control and late toxicities.

RESULTS

The 5-year biochemical failure free survival (BFFS) was 86% for patients treated with EBRT + LDR and 72% for patients treated with EBRT (P = 0.03). Both treatments were associated with comparable incidences of late genitourinary (GU) side effects (18-19%). Late rectal toxicity was decreased by 15% in patients treated with EBRT + LDR (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support EBRT followed by brachytherapy boost as a safe and effective method for dose escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The efficacy of a multimodality protocol using neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal therapy, brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated using biochemical outcomes and posttreatment biopsy results.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February 1994 and November 1999, 132 high-risk patients were treated with combined hormonal therapy (9 months), permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy, and external beam RT, with follow-up ranging from 36 to 88 months (median, 50 months). The eligibility criteria were any of the following: Gleason score 8-10, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/mL, clinical Stage T2c-T3, or positive seminal vesicle biopsy, or two or more of the following: Gleason score 7, PSA level >10-20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b. Twenty percent of patients had a positive seminal vesicle biopsy before therapy. Negative laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 44% of patients.

RESULTS

The actuarial overall freedom from PSA failure rate was 86% at 5 years. The freedom from PSA failure rate at 5 years was 97% for those with a Gleason score of < or =6 (35 of 36), 85% for a Gleason score of 7 (50 of 59), and 76% for a Gleason score of 8-10 (28 of 37; p = 0.03). A trend was noted toward worse outcomes in seminal vesicle biopsy-positive patients, with a 5-year freedom from PSA failure rate of 74% vs. 89% for all other patients (p = 0.06). Posttreatment prostate biopsies were performed in 47 patients and were negative in 96% at the first biopsy and 100% at the last biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Trimodality therapy with androgen suppression, brachytherapy, and external beam RT for high-risk prostate cancer results in excellent biochemical and pathologically confirmed local control.

Analysis of serial CT scans to assess template and catheter movement in prostate HDR brachytherapy

PURPOSE

As prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy becomes more prevalent, varying amounts of catheter displacement have been noted. To investigate the constancy of catheter position and its impact on dose distribution, we analyzed serial dosimetric CT scans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The data from 50 patients were analyzed. During initial CT treatment planning, transverse images of the implant volume were collected, and all structures were digitized into the Nucletron Brachytherapy Planning System. Digitally reconstructed radiographs were generated with rendering of the catheter tips, ischial tuberosity, and perineal template. The distance from each catheter tip to the template and to the ischial tuberosity was measured. The distance between the ischial tuberosity and the template was similarly measured. A second CT set was obtained at different intervals and compared with the first measurement to assess catheter and/or template movement. In 10 patients, the second CT set was obtained before the third fraction in both 2-mm and 5-mm slice sequences, and the latter was used to re-create the HDR plan.

RESULTS

Although no interfraction catheter movement relative to the template was found, the template-catheter unit moved in a caudal direction between HDR fractions. The amount of displacement was time dependent: 2 mm before the second fraction, 8 mm before the third, and 10 mm before the fourth. When comparing the first HDR treatment with the third, median decreases in the following dosimetric parameters were noted: dose to 90% of the prostate volume, 35% (r = 0-60); minimal dose to the base, 35% (r = 17-65); and maximal dose to 1 cm(3), 13% (r = 3-19%).

CONCLUSION

The interstitial catheters did not slip within the template and were not caudally displaced independently but rather in conjunction with the template. The displacement occurred in a time-dependent fashion, and, without redress, significant dosimetric changes are encountered by the third fraction.

Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy in Men with Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer

Permanent prostate brachytherapy techniques are associated with excellent biochemical control for patients with localised prostate cancer. Ten-year data show that permanent prostate brachytherapy is compatible with external beam irradiation or radical prostatectomy. However, treatment protocols and techniques for prostate brachytherapy vary between centres and there is little conformity of treatment protocols. The selection of patients for monotherapy or combined external beam irradiation and brachytherapy is controversial. The role of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation also remains unanswered in patients with localised prostate cancer. In addition, post-implant dosimetry may in fact be more significant for predicting outcome than the addition of adjuvant therapies, and should be a requirement when performing prostate brachytherapy. Data now seem to support specific computed tomography (CT)-based criteria to evaluate implant quality and delivered dose to the prostate. Unfortunately, prostate oedema and poor imaging techniques are limiting factors for evaluating implant dosimetry. Treatment planning techniques that use new treatment planning computers may assist in improving the implant procedure and dosimetry and are now available.

Brachytherapy: update and results

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer mortality in American men. Treatment options for these patients include radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and prostate brachytherapy. Patients with clinically and radiographically localized disease, especially young patients with few comorbid illnesses, are good candidates for prostate brachytherapy. Prostate brachytherapy has gained widespread acceptance throughout the past two decades and data from several large series of patients are now available. This article describes current techniques, treatment issues, and clinical results of permanent seed implants.

The effects of edema on urethral dose following palladium-103 prostate brachytherapy

The effects of edema on urethral dose after interstitial prostate brachytherapy with palladium-103 (103Pd) were studied. Fifty patients underwent a 90-Gy 103Pd implant followed by dosimetric computed tomography (CT). Twenty-one days later, a Foley catheter was reinserted and a dosimetric CT was repeated. The mean reduction in prostate volume between day 0 and day 21 was 16%. Median prostate D90 on day 0 was 89.7 Gy (range 59.5 to 127) and 99.5 Gy (range 62.5 to 130) on day 21. Median prostate V100 was 90% (range 63 to 98%) on day 0 and 96% (range 66 to 99%) on day 21. Median V150 was 61% (range 31 to 85%) on day 0 and 75% (range 39 to 93%) on day 21. Median urethral D50 was 107 Gy (range 57 to 201) on day 0 and 126 Gy (range 64 to 193) on day 21. Regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the decrease in the prostate volume and the increased urethral D50 (r 0.58, p < 0.05). Acute urinary toxicity was 32% grade 0, 38% grade 1, and 30% grade 2. The median urethral D50 increased by a mean of 18% with a correlation coefficient of 0.58 (p < 0.05). Catheterization of the urethra was well tolerated and was of value in better characterizing urethral dose after 103Pd brachytherapy.

Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation

PURPOSE

To determine the relative value of three MRI pulse sequences in defining the prostate volume after permanent implantation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 45 patients who received a permanent 125I implant were studied. Two weeks after implantation, an axial CT scan (2 mm thickness) and T1-weighted, T1-weighted fat saturation, and T2-weighted axial MRI (3-mm) studies were obtained. The prostate volumes were compared with the initial ultrasound planning volumes, and subsequently the CT, T1-weighted, and T1-weighted fat saturation MRI volumes were compared with the T2-weighted volumes. Discrepancies in volume were evaluated by visual inspection of the registered axial images and the registration of axial volumes on the sagittal T2-weighted volumes. In a limited set of patients, pre- and postimplant CT and T2-weighted MRI studies were available for comparison to determine whether prostate volume changes after implant were dependent on the imaging modality.

RESULTS

T1-weighted and T1-weighted fat saturation MRI and CT prostate volumes were consistently larger than the T2-weighted MRI prostate volumes, with a volume on average 1.33 (SD 0.24) times the T2-weighted volume. This discrepancy was due to the superiority of T2-weighted MRI for prostate definition at the following critical interfaces: membranous urethra, apex, and anterior base-bladder and posterior base-seminal vesicle interfaces. The differences in prostate definition in the anterior base region suggest that the commonly reported underdose may be due to overestimation of the prostate in this region by CT. The consistent difference in volumes suggests that the degree of swelling observed after implantation is in part a function of the imaging modality. In patients with pre- and postimplant CT and T2-weighted MRI images, swelling on the T2-weighted images was 1.1 times baseline and on CT was 1.3 times baseline, confirming the imaging modality dependence of prostate swelling.

CONCLUSION

Postimplant T2-weighted MRI images provided superior prostate definition in all critical regions of the prostate compared with CT and the other MRI sequences tested. In addition to defining an optimal technique, these findings call two prior observations into question. Under dosing at the anterior base region may be overestimated because of poor definition of the prostate-bladder muscle interface. The swelling observed after implantation was lower on T2-weighted images as well, suggesting that a fraction of postimplant swelling is a function of the imaging modality. These findings have implications for preimplant planning and postimplant evaluation. As implant planning techniques become more conformal, and registration methods become more efficient, T2-weighted MRI after implantation will improve the accuracy of postimplant dosimetry.

Primary radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

Prostate cancer in men is similar to breast cancer in women; both cancers rank first, respectively, in incidence and are normally responsive to radiation therapy. In addition, advances in mammography help detect earlier breast cancers, and the development and refinement of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in early detection of low-stage localized prostate cancers. This has generated debate over the proper management of localized prostate cancer. While there have not been any controlled, prospective, randomized trials of sufficient power to compare the various local therapies, based on the current available data, the three commonly used local modalities, surgery, and external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy (radioactive seed implant), have similar efficacy controlling the disease up to 10 years in many patients. Technological advances in treatment delivery and planning have improved the treatment of prostate cancer with external-beam radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), ultrasound-guided transperineal implant, or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as well as proton or neutron beam based therapies.

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

PURPOSE

When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason <or=6, and clinical stage <or=T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA >or=10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason >or=7, or clinical T stage >or=T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV.

American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for reporting morbidity after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To standardize the reporting of brachytherapy-related prostate morbidity to guide ongoing clinical practice and future investigations.

METHODS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) with expertise in prostate brachytherapy performed a literature review and, guided by their clinical experience, formulated specific recommendations for reporting on morbidity related to prostate brachytherapy.

RESULTS

The ABS recommends using validated, patient-administered health-related quality-of-life instruments for the determination of baseline and follow-up data regarding bowel, urinary, and sexual function. Both actuarial and crude incidences should be reported, along with the temporal resolution of specific complications, and correlated with the doses to the normal tissues. The International Prostate Symptom Score is recommended to assess urinary morbidity, and any dysuria, gross hematuria, urinary retention, incontinence, or medication use should be quantified. Likewise, the "Sexual Health Inventory for Men," which includes the specific erectile questions of the International Index of Erectile Function, is the preferred instrument for reporting sexual function, and the loss of sexual desire, incidence of hematospermia, painful orgasm (orgasmalgia), altered orgasm intensity, decreased ejaculatory volume, use of erectile aids, and use of hormones for androgen deprivation should be quantified. The ABS recommends adoption of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer acute and late radiation morbidity scoring scheme for reporting rectal morbidity and noting the incidence of rectal steroid, laser, or antidiarrheal use.

CONCLUSION

It is important to focus on health-related quality-of-life issues in the treatment of prostate cancer, because the control rates are very similar between appropriate treatment modalities. The ABS recommends using the International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function, and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity grading criteria for the determination of urinary, sexual, and bowel function, respectively. Additional parameters for reporting urinary, rectal, and sexual morbidities are presented. These morbidities should be correlated with the doses to the normal tissues. Some of these specific recommendations may be modified if and when new data become available.

(125)Iodine prostate brachytherapy: outcome from the first 100 consecutive patients and selection strategies incorporating urodynamics

OBJECTIVE

To report the results from the first 100 consecutive patients treated with 125I transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy between March 1999 and June 2001, and to determine if the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate volume or urodynamic variables correlate with acute morbidity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were assessed prospectively by uroflowmetry, the IPSS, a physical examination and transrectal ultrasonography. Of the 100 patients, 57 had a full urodynamic assessment, 61 presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), 25 were screen-detected and 14 presented with other problems. The IPSS was recorded at 1, 6 and 12 weeks, and then at 3-monthly intervals after treatment; significant events, e.g. acute urinary retention (AUR) and rectal symptoms, were recorded prospectively; the mean follow-up was 16 months.

RESULTS

No patients were incontinent after treatment. There was a temporary deterioration in IPSS in 89% of patients. Peak symptoms occurred at 6 weeks and a statistically significant deterioration in IPSS persisted until 9 months, but continued to improve throughout the follow-up. AUR affected seven patients, with a further 20 using clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) for symptoms. In most patients the symptoms resolved spontaneously to the levels before treatment, with only two patients requiring surgery for bladder outlet obstruction. The IPSS before treatment did not predict urodynamic obstruction. Urodynamically unobstructed patients did not require catheterization. By 2 years after implantation the mean IPSS was better than before treatment. Five patients had mild, transient proctitis.

CONCLUSION

Selecting patients with a low prostate volume and IPSS is likely to optimize the outcome of brachytherapy. Urodynamic studies may be helpful in predicting the risk of AUR and symptoms requiring CISC. Despite many patients presenting with LUTS, acute morbidity was no worse than that reported in large American series of predominantly screening-detected cancers. Prostate brachytherapy is well tolerated and may be safely delivered to patients with prostate cancer in the UK.

Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To overcome radioresistance for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer, a prospective trial of pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) interdigitated with dose-escalating conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy was performed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1991 and August 2000, 207 patients were treated with 46 Gy pelvic EBRT and increasing HDR brachytherapy boost doses (5.50-11.5 Gy/fraction) during 5 weeks. The eligibility criteria were pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >or=10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=7, or clinical Stage T2b or higher. Patients were divided into 2 dose levels, low-dose biologically effective dose <93 Gy (58 patients) and high-dose biologically effective dose >93 Gy (149 patients). No patient received hormones. We used the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure.

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years. The mean follow-up for the group was 4.4 years, and for the low and high-dose levels, it was 7.0 and 3.4 years, respectively. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rate was 74%, and the overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rate was 92%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical control rate for the low-dose group was 52%; the rate for the high-dose group was 87% (p <0.001). Improvement occurred in the cause-specific survival in favor of the brachytherapy high-dose level (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, a low-dose level, higher Gleason score, and higher nadir value were associated with increased biochemical failure. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications ranged from 0.5% to 9%. The actuarial 5-year impotency rate was 51%.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with transrectal ultrasound-guided real-time conformal HDR prostate brachytherapy boost is both a precise dose delivery system and a very effective treatment for unfavorable prostate cancer. We demonstrated an incremental beneficial effect on biochemical control and cause-specific survival with higher doses. These results, coupled with the low risk of complications, the advantage of not being radioactive after implantation, and the real-time interactive planning, define a new standard for treatment.

Permanent seed implantation for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Prostate brachytherapy has become a popular treatment option for localized prostate cancer with over 44,000 procedures performed in 2000. Eighty-seven percent to 93% of patients who have a serum prostate-specific antigen less than 10 ng/mL, Gleason score of 6 or less, and low risk (disease stage < or = T2a) can be expected to have an 8 to 10 year disease-free rate. The radiation dose delivered by the implants should exceed 140 Gy in men implanted with I-125 monotherapy. Patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer would benefit from the addition of either hormonal therapy and/or external beam irradiation to the implantation of seeds. Postimplant incontinence and proctitis can be minimized by controlling high radiation doses to the urethra and rectum. Potency is preserved in 70% of men with good preimplantation erectile function. Advances in technology, such as intraoperative dosimetry, will continue to make brachytherapy an attractive treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer.

Predictive factors of urinary retention following prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and duration of urinary retention requiring catheterization and the factors predictive for these end points.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred eighty-two patients treated with prostate brachytherapy alone were evaluated. Clinical and treatment-related factors examined included: age, baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), presence of comorbidity, planning ultrasound target volume (PUTV), postimplant prostate CT scan volume, the CT:PUTV ratio, number of seeds inserted, number of needles used, use of neoadjuvant hormones, procedural physician, clinical stage, Gleason score, and pretreatment PSA. Dosimetric quality indicators were also examined.

RESULTS

Urinary obstruction after prostate brachytherapy developed in 43 (15%) patients. The median duration of catheter insertion was 21 days (mean 49, range 1-365). Univariate analysis demonstrated that presence of diabetes, preimplant volume, postimplant volume, CT:PUTV ratio, number of needles, and dosimetric parameters were predictive for catheterization. However, in multivariate analysis, only the baseline IPSS, CT:PUTV ratio, and presence of diabetes were significant independent predictive factors for catheterization.

CONCLUSION

Baseline IPSS was the most important predictive factor for postimplantation catheterization. The extent of postimplant edema, as reflected by the CT:PUTV ratio, predicted for need and duration of catheterization. The presence of diabetes was predictive for catheterization, but may relate to the absence of prophylactic steroids, and therefore requires further evaluation.

Erectile function after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of potency preservation after permanent prostate brachytherapy using a validated patient-administered questionnaire and to evaluate the effect of multiple clinical and treatment parameters on penile erectile function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred twenty-five patients underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy from April 1995 to October 1999. Two hundred nine patients who were potent before brachytherapy and who at the time of the survey were not receiving hormonal therapy were mailed the specific erectile questions of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire with a self-addressed stamped envelope. The questionnaire consisted of 5 questions, with a maximal score of 25. Of the 209 patients, 181 (87%) completed and returned the questionnaire. The mean and median follow-up was 40.4 +/- 14.9 and 40.6 months, respectively (range 19-75). Preimplant erectile function was assigned using a three-tiered scoring system (2 = erections always or nearly always sufficient for vaginal penetration; 1 = erections sufficient for vaginal penetration but considered suboptimal; 0 = the inability to obtain erections and/or erections inadequate for vaginal penetration). Postimplant potency was defined as an IIEF score >/=11. The clinical parameters evaluated for erectile function included patient age, preimplant potency, clinical T-stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, elapsed time after implantation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco consumption. Treatment parameters included radiation dose to the prostate gland, use of hormonal manipulation, use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), choice of isotope, prostate volume, and planning volume. The efficacy of sildenafil citrate in brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction (ED) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Pretreatment erectile function scores of 2 and 1 were assigned to 125 and 56 patients, respectively. With a 6-year follow-up, 39% of patients maintained potency after prostate brachytherapy, with a plateau on the potency preservation curve. Postimplant preservation of potency (IIEF >/=11) correlated with preimplant erectile function (50.4% vs. 13.2% for preimplant scores of 2 and 1, respectively, p <0.001), patient age (57.4%, 38.2%, and 21.9% for patients <60, 60-69, and >/=70 years old, respectively, p <0.004), use of supplemental EBRT (52.0% vs. 26.4% for patients without and with EBRT, p <0.001), and a history of diabetes mellitus (41.4% vs. 0% for patients without and with diabetes, respectively, p = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, clinical stage, radiation dose to the prostate gland, hormonal manipulation, choice of isotope, history of hypertension, and tobacco consumption had no effect on the ultimate preservation of potency. Only the preimplant potency score, use of supplemental EBRT, and diabetes maintained statistical significance. Sixty-two patients used sildenafil, with 53 (85%) reporting a favorable response. When potent patients were grouped with the ED patients who used sildenafil, the 6-year actuarial rate of potency preservation was 92%. Including the 70 impotent patients who never used sildenafil, the actuarial 6-year rate of potency preservation with and without pharmacologic support was 54% and 39%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that brachytherapy-induced ED is more common than previously reported and may be the result of obtaining patient information by means of a validated quality-of-life instrument by mail and not by personal interview. In multivariate analysis, only pretreatment potency, supplemental EBRT, and diabetes maintained statistical significance. Most patients with brachytherapy-induced ED responded favorably to sildenafil. Although the 6-year actuarial incidence of potency preservation was 39%, 52% of patients not receiving supplemental EBRT maintained potency. In addition, with pharmacologic support, 92% of patients maintained potency.

The role of external radiotherapy in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy

To examine the difference in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)-Relapse Free Survival (RFS) in patients (pts) with prostate cancer treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) alone (monotherapy) or combined modality PPB and external radiotherapy (CMT) by a matched pair analysis. There were 1476 pts who were treated loosely based on the American Brachytherapy Society criteria for monotherapy or CMT. PSA-RFS was based upon the Kattan modification of the ASTRO consensus panel definition. A computer generated matching process was undertaken to produce two equally weighted pairs of patients divided by treatment methodology and Kaplan-Meier PSA-RFS curves were generated and compared by chi(2) testing. All pts were treated between 1992 and 2000 with a 6-y PSA-RFS of 81.9%. The median follow-up was 34.7 months. Patients treated with CMT presented with higher pre-treatment PSA values, Gleason sum score, clinical stage, risk classification, and were more likely to be treated with neoadjuvant hormones. A matched-pair analysis with 314 pts in each group was created stratified by the addition of neoadjuvant hormones, Gleason score sum and the pretreatment PSA value. Actuarial 5-y PSA-RFS was 77.0% for the monotherapy group and 81.1% for the combined therapy group (P=0.54).chi(2) testing by pretreatment PSA value, Gleason score sum, risk stratification, isotope and the addition of neoadjuvant hormones failed to identify any group with a significant difference in 5-y PSA-RFS. In conclusion, this retrospective study presents a large cohort of patients treated with PPB that failed to identify a significant advantage for the addition of combined therapy. A matched pair analysis performed also failed to identify any significant difference based on treatment modality.

Risk factors for acute urinary retention requiring temporary intermittent catheterization after prostate brachytherapy: a prospective study

PURPOSE

We prospectively investigated prognostic factors for men undergoing transperineal radioactive seed implantation for prostate cancer at the University of Washington.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February and April, 1998, 62 consecutive unselected patients were prospectively followed after brachytherapy for early-stage prostate adenocarcinoma. Pretreatment variables included age, American Urological Association (AUA) score, uroflowimetry, and prostate volume by ultrasound. Nonrandomized variables included hormonal therapy, seed type, and use of pelvic radiotherapy. Patients were contacted by phone at one week postoperatively and at one-month intervals thereafter. Follow-up continued until all patients provided the date of last catheterization.

RESULTS

Urinary retention rate at one week was 34% (21 of 63 patients). At one month, 29%; at three months, 18%; and at six months, 10%. Preoperative flow rate and post-void residual did not predict for retention (p =.48 and p =.58). Use of alpha blockers, hormonal therapy, type of seed (103Pd or 1251), or external beam radiotherapy had no impact on risk of retention at any followup point. Preimplant volume and AUA score predicted for retention on univariate analysis, but on multivariate analysis only postimplant volume remained significant (p =.02) for predicting retention risk and duration.

CONCLUSION

Patients with large prostate size (>36 g) and higher AUA score (>10) appear to be at greater risk of risk of retention as well as duration of retention as defined in our study. Further investigation will be needed to clarify the risk of urinary retention for men undergoing brachytherapy.

Role of hormonal therapy in the management of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation

PURPOSE

To study the impact of hormonal therapy (HTx) on intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with Stage T1b-T3bN0 prostate cancer, and Gleason score > or = 7 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >10 ng/mL were treated with seed implantation with or without HTx. Their disease was defined as intermediate risk (PSA 10-20, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b) or high risk (two or more intermediate criteria, or PSA >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, or Stage T2c-T3). The median follow-up for 201 eligible patients was 42 months (range 18-110). Biochemical failure was defined as a rising PSA >1.0 ng/mL. Pretreatment disease characteristics, implant dose, and HTx were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

HTx significantly improved 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure rate, 79% vs. 54% without HTx. In addition, high-dose, PSA < or = 15 ng/mL, intermediate risk, and Stage T2a or lower significantly improved outcome in the univariate analyses. HTx was the most significant predictor of 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (p <0.0001) in a multivariate analysis. The best outcome was in the intermediate-risk patients treated with a high implant dose and HTx, resulting in a 4-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure rate of 94%.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective review, HTx improved outcome in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy. HTx was the most important prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariate analyses.

Brachytherapy for carcinoma of the prostate: techniques, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

Brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma has developed as either low dose rate permanent implants or high dose rate afterloading. Both approaches offer unsurpassed dose escalation and, particularly with permanent implants, the convenience of a single outpatient treatment. These therapies have now entered the mainstream of treatment options and are in the refinement phase of development. Techniques of implantation, treatment planning approaches, innovative fractionation schemes, and appropriate patient selection are the subject of current investigation. Treatment results are available beyond 10 years and appear equivalent or superior to other modalities. Although short term morbidity can be significant with brachytherapy, most current series report low long-term urinary and rectal complications. Meaningful quality of life studies and randomized cooperative group trials are now underway and should help define the role of brachytherapy in the near future.

Preliminary toxicity and prostate-specific antigen response of a Phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, 103Pd brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer•

PURPOSE

Standard therapies for locally advanced prostate cancer have resulted in suboptimal disease control rates. A Phase I/II trial was designed for patients with positive seminal vesicle biopsies, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >15 ng/ml, Gleason score > or =8 or clinical classification T2c-T3 to improve local control and to test the tolerance of the prostate to high-dose radiation by using neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, 103Pd brachytherapy, and conformal three-dimensional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). This article outlines treatment-related morbidity and PSA response to this regimen and analyzes the effect of escalating doses of brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forth-three patients with T1c-T3 prostate cancer were enrolled in a Phase I/II trial from March 1994 through September 1997. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 64 months (median, 32 months). Pretreatment PSA ranged from 2.1 to 202 ng/ml (median, 16 ng/ml). Seventy-seven percent (33 of 43) of patients had high-grade tumors (score > or =7). Seventy-four percent (32 of 43) had stage > or =T2c. A total of 21 (49%) patients had positive seminal vesicle biopsies. Treatment consisted of hormonal therapy for 3 months with leuprolide and flutamide followed by a 103Pd implant and, 2 months later, 59.4 Gy of three-dimensional EBRT. Hormonal therapy was continued for 9 months. The planned 103Pd dose was escalated from 57 Gy (13 patients) to 77 Gy (13 patients) to 86 Gy (17 patients).

RESULTS

The actuarial freedom from PSA failure (PSA>0.5 ng/ml) at 4 years was 74%. There were no significant differences found when analyzing patients by presenting PSA or seminal vesicle status. There was a trend toward improved outcome with higher doses delivered to the prostate via the implant. Patients receiving doses > or =65 Gy (31 patients) had a freedom from PSA failure rate at 4 years of 89.5%, compared with 52.5% for those receiving doses <65 Gy (10 patients; p=0.08). The last PSA values for those patients free from PSA failure were < or =0.1 ng/ml in 25 (69%), >0.1-0.2 ng/ml in 5 (14%), and >0.2-0.5 ng/ml in 6 (17%). The actuarial freedom from developing Grade 2 proctitis was 75% at 4 years. There was a trend toward increased proctitis with increasing prostate implant doses. Patients with doses < or =70 Gy (n=12) had a 92% freedom from Grade 2 proctitis compared with 67.5% for those with doses delivered to 90% of the gland from a dose-volume histogram of >70 Gy (n=29) (p=0.15). There were no cases of Grade 3 or 4 proctitis. The 3-year actuarial preservation of sexual potency rate was 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results from this regimen show an improvement in PSA control for this group of locally advanced prostate cancer patients over more standard therapies. To maximize control while minimizing toxicity, doses of 65-70 Gy of 103Pd should be used when 59.4 Gy of three-dimensional EBRT is delivered. Longer follow-up will be needed to further substantiate these findings.