Thalamic- and cerebellar-projecting interpolaris neuron responses to afferent inputs

Involvement of the cerebellum in migraine

Migraine is a disabling neurological disease characterized by moderate or severe headaches and accompanied by sensory abnormalities, e.g., photophobia, allodynia, and vertigo. It affects approximately 15% of people worldwide. Despite advancements in current migraine therapeutics, mechanisms underlying migraine remain elusive. Within the central nervous system, studies have hinted that the cerebellum may play an important sensory integrative role in migraine. More specifically, the cerebellum has been proposed to modulate pain processing, and imaging studies have revealed cerebellar alterations in migraine patients. This review aims to summarize the clinical and preclinical studies that link the cerebellum to migraine. We will first discuss cerebellar roles in pain modulation, including cerebellar neuronal connections with pain-related brain regions. Next, we will review cerebellar symptoms and cerebellar imaging data in migraine patients. Lastly, we will highlight the possible roles of the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine symptoms, including preclinical cerebellar studies in animal models of migraine.

Stimulation of CGRP-expressing neurons in the medial cerebellar nucleus induces light and touch sensitivity in mice

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is considered a major player in migraine pathophysiology. However, the location and mechanisms of CGRP actions in migraine are not clearly elucidated. One important question yet to be answered is: Does central CGRP signaling play a role in migraine? One candidate site is the cerebellum, which serves as a sensory and motor integration center and is activated in migraine patients. The cerebellum has the most CGRP binding sites in the central nervous system and a deep cerebellar nucleus, the medial nucleus (MN), expresses CGRP (MN^CGRP). A previous study demonstrated that CGRP delivery into the cerebellum induced migraine-like behaviors. We hypothesized that stimulation of MN^CGRP neurons might induce migraine-like behaviors. To test the hypothesis, we used an optogenetic strategy using Calca^Cre/+ mice to drive Cre-dependent expression of channelrhodopsin-2 selectively in CGRP neurons in the cerebellar MN. A battery of behavioral tests was done to assess preclinical behaviors that are surrogates of migraine symptoms, including light aversion, cutaneous allodynia, and spontaneous pain when MN^CGRP neurons were optically stimulated. Motor functions were also assessed. Optical stimulation of MN^CGRP neurons decreased the time spent in the light, which was coupled to increased time spent resting in the dark, but not the light. These changes were only significant in female mice. Plantar tactile sensitivity was increased in the ipsilateral paws of both sexes, but contralateral paw data were less clear. There was no significant increase in anxiety-like behavior, spontaneous pain (squint), or changes in gait. These discoveries reveal that MN^CGRP neurons may contribute to migraine-like sensory hypersensitivity to light and touch.

CGRP Administration Into the Cerebellum Evokes Light Aversion, Tactile Hypersensitivity, and Nociceptive Squint in Mice

The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a major player in migraine pathophysiology. Previous preclinical studies demonstrated that intracerebroventricular administration of CGRP caused migraine-like behaviors in mice, but the sites of action in the brain remain unidentified. The cerebellum has the most CGRP binding sites in the central nervous system and is increasingly recognized as both a sensory and motor integration center. The objective of this study was to test whether the cerebellum, particularly the medial cerebellar nuclei (MN), might be a site of CGRP action. In this study, CGRP was directly injected into the right MN of C57BL/6J mice via a cannula. A battery of tests was done to assess preclinical behaviors that are surrogates of migraine-like symptoms. CGRP caused light aversion measured as decreased time in the light zone even with dim light. The mice also spent more time resting in the dark zone, but not the light, along with decreased rearing and transitions between zones. These behaviors were similar for both sexes. Moreover, significant responses to CGRP were seen in the open field assay, von Frey test, and automated squint assay, indicating anxiety, tactile hypersensitivity, and spontaneous pain, respectively. Interestingly, CGRP injection caused significant anxiety and spontaneous pain responses only in female mice, and a more robust tactile hypersensitivity in female mice. No detectable effect of CGRP on gait was observed in either sex. These results suggest that CGRP injection in the MN causes light aversion accompanied by increased anxiety, tactile hypersensitivity, and spontaneous pain. A caveat is that we cannot exclude contributions from other cerebellar regions in addition to the MN due to diffusion of the injected peptide. These results reveal the cerebellum as a new site of CGRP actions that may contribute to migraine-like hypersensitivity.

Intracranial nociception

Understanding intracranial nociceptive innervation is essential to understand the pathophysiology of headaches. Our knowledge about human intracranial nociception comes from sparse observations during neurosurgical procedures performed in awake patients, from human anatomical studies and from experimental studies in animals. In this article we review the anatomical and functional organization underlying nociceptive innervation. Intracranial nociception is mainly mediated by the trigeminal system, except in the posterior cranial fossa that is innervated by the first cervical roots. For decades, the dura mater, its vessels and major cerebral blood vessels were considered as the only intracranial pain-sensitive structures. Recent animal and human studies have suggested that smaller brain arteries and potentially pia mater might also be pain sensitive. Nociceptive neurons innervating intracranial blood vessels project via the ophthalmic division (V1) to the trigeminal ganglion and store several neurotransmitters including glutamate, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The trigeminal ganglion, root and brainstem nuclei have a specific topographic and functional somatotopy. Progressive transition between the trigeminal spinal nucleus and the dorsal horn of the cervical spinal cord, and convergence of nociceptive inputs from the face, intracranial structures and the occipital area on the so-called "trigemino-cervical complex" may explain some headache features, relations between facial and occipital pain, and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation in headache. The specific anatomic organization of the trigeminal system, from the primary-order neuron in the trigeminal ganglion, to the second-order neuron is the trigeminal nuclei, may explain a part of the various characteristics of headaches.

Thalamo-insular pathway conveying orofacial muscle proprioception in the rat

Little is known about how proprioceptive signals arising from muscles reach to higher brain regions such as the cerebral cortex. We have recently shown that a particular thalamic region, the caudo-ventromedial edge (VPMcvm) of ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus (VPM), receives the proprioceptive signals from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs) in rats. In this study, we further addressed how the orofacial thalamic inputs from the JCMSs were transmitted from the thalamus (VPMcvm) to the cerebral cortex in rats. Injections of a retrograde and anterograde neuronal tracer, wheat-germ agglutinin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP), into the VPMcvm demonstrated that the thalamic pathway terminated mainly in a rostrocaudally narrow area in the dorsal part of granular insular cortex rostroventrally adjacent to the rostralmost part of the secondary somatosensory cortex (dGIrvs2). We also electrophysiologically confirmed that the dGIrvs2 received the proprioceptive inputs from JCMSs. To support the anatomical evidence of the VPMcvm-dGIrvs2 pathway, injections of a retrograde neuronal tracer Fluorogold into the dGIrvs2 demonstrated that the thalamic neurons projecting to the dGIrvs2 were confined in the VPMcvm and the parvicellular part of ventral posterior nucleus. In contrast, WGA-HRP injections into the lingual nerve area of core VPM demonstrated that axon terminals were mainly labeled in the core regions of the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, which were far from the dGIrvs2. These results suggest that the dGIrvs2 is a specialized cortical region receiving the orofacial proprioceptive inputs. Functional contribution of the revealed JCMSs-VPMcvm-dGIrvs2 pathway to Tourette syndrome is also discussed.

Response properties of temporomandibular joint mechanosensitive neurons in the trigeminal sensory complex of the rabbit

The neurophysiological properties of neurons sensitive to TMJ movement (TMJ neurons) in the trigeminal sensory complex (Vcomp) during passive movement of the isolated condyle were examined in 46 rabbits. Discharges of TMJ neurons from the rostral part of the Vcomp were recorded with a microelectrode when the isolated condyle was moved manually and with a computer-regulated mechanostimulator. A total of 443 neurons responding to mechanical stimulation of the face and oral cavity were recorded from the brainstem. Twenty-one TMJ neurons were detected rostrocaudally from the dorsal part of the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus (NVsnpr), subnucleus oralis of the trigeminal spinal nucleus, and reticular formation surrounding the trigeminal motor nucleus. Most of the TMJ neurons were located in the dorso-rostral part of the NVsnpr. Of the TMJ units recorded, 90 % were slowly adapting and 26 % had an accompanying resting discharge. The majority (86 %) of the TMJ units responded to the movement of the isolated condyle in the anterior and/or ventral directions, and half were sensitive to the condyle movement in a single direction. The discharge frequencies of TMJ units increased as the condyle displacement and constant velocity (5 mm/s) increased within a 5-mm anterior displacement of the isolated condyle. Based on these results, we conclude that sensory information is processed by TMJ neurons encoding at least joint position and displacement in the physiological range of mandibular displacement.

Nociceptive craniofacial muscle primary afferent neurons synapse in both the rostral and caudal brain stem

Limited information is available on muscle afferent neurons with fine fibers despite their presumed participation in musculoskeletal disorders, including temporomandibular disorders. To study these neurons, intracellular recordings were made from the central axons of slowly conducting muscle afferent neurons in anesthetized rats. After intraaxonal impalement, axons were characterized by masseter nerve stimulation, receptive field testing, muscle stretching and intramuscular injection of hypertonic saline. Intracellular recordings were made from 310 axons (conduction velocity: 6.5-60(M)/s, mean = 27.3(M)/s; following frequency: 27-250 Hz, mean = 110Hz). No neurons responded to cutaneous palpation or muscle stretching. Some axons (n = 34) were intracellularly stained with biotinamide. These neurons were classified as group II/III noxious mechanoreceptors because their mechanical threshold exceeded 15 mN, and conduction velocities ranged from 12 to 40.2(M)/s (mean = 25.3(M)/s). Two morphological types were recognized by using an object-based, three-dimensional colocalization methodology to locate synapses. One type (IIIHTM(Vp-Vc)) possessed axon collaterals that emerged along the entire main axon and synapsed in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus and spinal trigeminal subnuclei oralis (Vo), interpolaris (Vi), and caudalis (Vc). A second type (IIIHTM(Vo-Vc)) possessed axon collaterals that synapsed only in caudal Vo, Vi, and Vc. Our previous studies show that muscle spindle afferent neurons are activated by innocuous stimuli and synapse in the rostral and caudal brain stem; here we demonstrate that nociceptive muscle mechanoreceptor afferent axons also synapse in rostral and caudal brain stem regions. Traditional dogma asserts that the most rostral trigeminal sensory complex exclusively processes innocuous somatosensory information, whereas caudal portions receive nociceptive sensory input; the data reported here do not support this paradigm.

Modulation of jaw muscle spindle afferent activity following intramuscular injections with hypertonic saline

Transient noxious chemical stimulation of small diameter muscle afferents modulates jaw movement-related responses of caudal brainstem neurons. While it is likely that the effect is mediated from the spindle afferents in the mesencephalic nucleus (Vmes) via the caudally projecting Probst's tract, the mechanisms of pain induced modulations of jaw muscle spindle afferents is not known. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that jaw muscle nociceptors gain access to muscle spindle afferents in the same muscle via central mechanisms and alter their sensitivity. Thirty-five neurons recorded from the Vmes were characterized as muscle spindle afferents based on their responses to passive jaw movements, muscle palpation, and electrical stimulation of the masseter nerve. Each cell was tested by injecting a small volume (250 microl) of either 5% hypertonic and/or isotonic saline into the receptor-bearing muscle. Twenty-nine units were tested with 5% hypertonic saline, of which 79% (23/29) showed significant modulation of mean firing rates (MFRs) during one or more phases of ramp-and-hold movements. Among the muscle spindle primary-like units (n = 12), MFRs of 4 units were facilitated, five reduced, two showed mixed responses and one unchanged. In secondary-like units (n = 17), MFRs of 9 were facilitated, three reduced and five unchanged. Thirteen units were tested with isotonic saline, of which 77% showed no significant changes of MFRs. Further analysis revealed that the hypertonic saline not only affected the overall output of muscle spindle afferents, but also increased the variability of firing and altered the relationship between afferent signal and muscle length. These results demonstrated that activation of muscle nociceptors significantly affects proprioceptive properties of jaw muscle spindles via central neural mechanisms. The changes can have deleterious effects on oral motor function as well as kinesthetic sensibility.

Neurobiological and psychophysical mechanisms underlying the oral sensation produced by carbonated water

Carbonated drinks elicit a sensation that is highly sought after, yet the underlying neural mechanisms are ill-defined. We hypothesize that CO(2) is converted via carbonic anhydrase into carbonic acid, which excites lingual nociceptors that project to the trigeminal nuclei. We investigated this hypothesis using three methodological approaches. Electrophysiological methods were used to record responses of single units located in superficial laminae of the dorsomedial aspect of trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc) evoked by lingual application of carbonated water in anesthetized rats. After pretreatment of the tongue with the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide, neuronal responses to carbonated water were significantly attenuated, followed by recovery. Using c-Fos immunohistochemistry, we investigated the distribution of brainstem neurons activated by intraoral carbonated water. Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) was significantly higher in the superficial laminae of dorsomedial and ventrolateral Vc in animals treated with carbonated water versus controls. Dorzolamide pretreatment significantly reduced FLI in dorsomedial Vc. We also examined the sensation elicited by carbonated water in human psychophysical studies. When one side of the tongue was pretreated with dorzolamide, followed by bilateral application of carbonated water, a significant majority of subjects chose the untreated side as having a stronger sensation and assigned significantly higher intensity ratings to that side. Dorzolamide did not reduce irritation elicited by pentanoic acid. The present data support the hypothesis that carbonated water excites lingual nociceptors via a carbonic anhydrase-dependent process, in turn exciting neurons in Vc that are presumably involved in signaling oral irritant sensations.

Evidence for subnucleus interpolaris in craniofacial muscle pain mechanisms demonstrated by intramuscular injections with hypertonic saline

The subnucleus interpolaris (Vi) has been identified as a major recipient for trigeminal ganglionic input from jaw muscles, and contains neurons with nociceptive properties similar to those in the subnucleus caudalis (Vc). Therefore, Vi may be another important site for processing craniofacial muscle nociception. The aims of present study were to define functional properties of Vi neurons that receive input from masseter muscle afferents by characterizing their responses to electrical, mechanical, and to chemical stimulation of the muscle. Ninety cells were identified as masseter muscle units in 11 adult cats. Most of these units (79%) received additional inputs from orofacial skin. Following the intramuscular injection of 5% hypertonic saline, 49% of the cells showed a significant modulation of either the resting discharge and/or responses to innocuous mechanical stimulation on their cutaneous receptive fields (RFs). The most common response to saline injection was an induction or facilitation of resting discharge which declined as an exponential decay function, returning to pre-injection level within 3-4 min. Forty-five percent of the muscle units that were tested with mechanical stimulation (13/29) showed a prolonged inhibition of mechanically-evoked responses. In most cases (8/13), the inhibitory response was accompanied by initial facilitation. The observations that Vi contained a population of neurons that receive small diameter muscle afferent inputs, responded to noxious mechanical stimulation on the muscle and to a chemical irritant that is known to produce pain in humans provide compelling evidence for the involvement of Vi in craniofacial muscle pain mechanisms.

Excitatory amino release within spinal trigeminal nucleus after mustard oil injection into the temporomandibular joint region of the rat

Inflammation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region evokes pain and hyperalgesia as well as causing persistent changes in the response properties of central trigeminal neurons. To determine if excitatory amino acids have a role in TMJ-induced responses, extracellular concentrations were measured in microdialysate samples from probes positioned in the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Vsp) near the transition region between subnucleus interpolaris and subnucleus caudalis (Vi/Vc) in chloralose-anesthetized rats. Injection of the selective small fiber excitant, mustard oil (20 microliters, 20% solution), into the ipsilateral TMJ region caused a transient (by 10 min) increase in glutamate (from 0.48 +/- 0.16 to 1.94 +/- 0.78 microM, P < 0.005) and aspartate (from 0.29 +/- 0.11 to 1.78 +/- 0.82 microM, P < 0.025) among sites located at the ventrolateral pole of the Vi/Vc transition region (n = 6). Samples from probes located within the ventral Vsp, but outside this Vi/Vc transition region (n = 9), did not show significant changes in amino acid concentrations. Glutamate and aspartate also increased after mustard oil injections into the contralateral TMJ region. Dialysate concentrations of serine and taurine did not change significantly after mustard oil injections. Addition of high potassium (150 mM) to the perfusate solution caused increases in glutamate and aspartate regardless of probe location. The transient and selective release of glutamate and aspartate within the Vi/Vc transition after acute irritation of the TMJ region is consistent with a proposed role for excitatory amino acids in mediating noxious sensory input from deep orofacial structures. Together with previous reports of c-fos expression, these results suggest that neurons within the ventrolateral portion of the Vi/Vc transition may serve as a relay site for the integration of sensory or reflex responses to acute inflammation of the TMJ region.

Projection of jaw-muscle spindle afferents to the caudal brainstem in rats demonstrated using intracellular biotinamide

Intracellular staining with biotinamide was used to study the axonal projection and synaptic morphology of rat jaw-muscle spindle afferents. Intracellular recordings in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus (Vme) were identified as spindle afferent responses by their increased firing during stretching of the jaw-elevator muscles. Biotinamide-stained axon collaterals with boutons were found in the trigeminal motor nucleus (Vmo), Vme, the region dorsal to Vmo including the supratrigeminal region, the dorsomedial portion of the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus, and the dorsomedial part of the rostral spinal trigeminal subnucleus oralis. Additional, previously undescribed projections of jaw-muscle spindle afferents were found to the dorsomedial portion of the caudal spinal trigeminal subnucleus oralis (Vodm), the dorsomedial part of the spinal trigeminal subnucleus interpolaris (Vidm), the caudal parvicellular reticular formation, laminae IV and V of the spinal trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc), and the dorsal division of the medullary reticular field. Labeled spindle boutons in Vodm formed predominately axodendritic synapses. Some of these boutons received presynaptic inputs from unlabeled P-type boutons containing clear, spherical, or flattened vesicles. In Vidm, labeled collaterals and boutons were densely clustered into glomerular-like structures. Labeled boutons in Vidm made axodendritic, axosomatic, and axoaxonic synapses and received synaptic contacts from unlabeled boutons containing clear, spherical, or flat and pleomorphic vesicles. Unlabeled presynaptic boutons in Vidm occasionally contained dense core vesicles. Labeled boutons in Vc mainly formed synaptic contacts with large diameter dendrites. This projection of jaw-muscle spindle afferents to caudal brainstem regions may play a significant role in masticatory-muscle stretch reflexes and in the integration of trigeminal proprioceptive information and its transmission to higher centers.

Inputs from identified jaw-muscle spindle afferents to trigeminothalamic neurons in the rat: a double-labeling study using retrograde HRP and intracellular biotinamide

Projections from physiologically identified jaw-muscle spindle afferents onto trigeminothalamic neurons were studied in the rat. Trigeminothalamic neurons were identified by means of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase from the ventroposteromedial nucleus of the thalamus. Labeled neurons were found contralaterally in the supratrigeminal region (Vsup), the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus, the ventrolateral part of the trigeminal subnucleus oralis, the spinal trigeminal subnuclei interpolaris and caudalis, the reticular formation, and an area ventral to the trigeminal motor nucleus (Vmo) and medial to the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus (AVM). Jaw-muscle spindle afferents were physiologically identified by their increased firing during stretching of the jaw muscles and intracellularly injected with biotinamide. Axon collaterals and boutons from jaw-muscle spindle afferents were found in Vmo; Vsup; the dorsomedial part of the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus (Vpdm); the dorsomedial part of the spinal trigeminal subnuclei oralis, interpolaris (Vidm) and caudalis; the parvicellular reticular formation (PCRt); and the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. Trigeminothalamic neurons in Vsup, Vpdm, Vidm, PCRt, and AVM were associated with axon collaterals and boutons from intracellularly stained jaw-muscle spindle afferents. Trigeminothalamic neurons in Vsup, Vpdm, Vidm, and PCRt were closely apposed by one to 14 intracellularly labeled boutons from jaw-muscle spindle afferents, suggesting a powerful input to some trigeminothalamic neurons. These data demonstrate that muscle length and velocity feedback from jaw-muscle spindle afferents is projected to the contralateral thalamus via multiple regions of the trigeminal system and implicates these pathways in the projection of trigeminal proprioceptive information to the cerebral cortex.