Radiographic features of gastritis using the biphasic contrast technique

Double-contrast upper gastrointestinal radiography: a pattern approach for diseases of the stomach

The double-contrast upper gastrointestinal series is a valuable diagnostic test for evaluating structural and functional abnormalities of the stomach. This article will review the normal radiographic anatomy of the stomach. The principles of analyzing double-contrast images will be discussed. A pattern approach for the diagnosis of gastric abnormalities will also be presented, focusing on abnormal mucosal patterns, depressed lesions, protruded lesions, thickened folds, and gastric narrowing.

Gastritis from NSAIDS to Helicobacter pylori

Gastritis is a histologic diagnosis. To understand gastritis, the radiologist must have some working knowledge of gastric histology and pathology. Therefore, this article first describes normal histologic and radiologic anatomy. The pathology of gastritis is then presented to give the radiologist a basis for understanding the radiologic findings. Finally, gastritis is discussed from a clinical and radiologic perspective.

Radiographically diagnosed antral gastritis: findings in patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection

The purpose of this study was to characterize the radiographic findings of antral gastritis and to determine whether there are differences in the appearance of antral gastritis in patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection. A search of radiology, endoscopy and pathology files revealed 90 patients with antral gastritis on double contrast upper gastrointestinal tract studies who had endoscopy with testing for H. pylori. The barium studies were evaluated to further characterize the findings of antral gastritis without knowledge of the H. pylori status of the patients or of the endoscopy or pathology findings. The radiographic findings of antral gastritis included thickened folds in 67 patients (74%), polypoid antral gastritis (a subset of patients with thickened folds) in 6 (9%), antral erosions in 21 (23%), enlarged areae gastricae in 14 (16%), crenulation of the lesser curvature in 4 (4%), mucosal nodularity in 2 (2%), a hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold in 2 (2%) and antral striae in 1 (1%). 43 patients (48%) with antral gastritis were H. pylori positive and 47 patients (52%) were H. pylori negative. Thickened folds were detected in 39 H. pylori-positive patients (91%) with antral gastritis vs 28 H. pylori-negative patients (60%) (p<0.001); polypoid gastritis in 6 H. pylori-positive patients (14%) vs 0 H. pylori-negative patients (p<0.05); enlarged areae gastricae in 14 H. pylori-positive patients (33%) vs 0 H. pylori-negative patients (p<0.0001); and antral erosions in 2 H. pylori-positive patients (5%) vs 19 H. pylori-negative patients (40%) (p<0.0001). Our experience suggests that antral gastritis caused by H. pylori infection is associated with characteristic features on double contrast studies (including thickened folds, polypoid gastritis and enlarged areae gastricae) and that this condition is rarely associated with antral erosions. Thus, radiologists can often suggest whether the patient's gastritis is caused by H. pylori on the basis of radiographic findings.

Hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold: reassessment of radiographic findings in 40 patients

PURPOSE

To reassess the findings of a hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold on double-contrast barium studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of radiologic files resulted in recovery of records of 1,796 patients with findings of antral gastritis on double-contrast upper gastrointestinal studies. According to radiologic reports, 40 patients had a hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold. The radiographs were reviewed retrospectively to determine the size, location, and morphologic features of the folds. Clinical, radiologic, and/or endoscopic follow-up data were obtained in 22 patients.

RESULTS

All but two patients were symptomatic, and all but one responded to medical treatment. The hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold was located on the lesser curvature of the distal antrum in all patients and extended to the pylorus in 25 (62%) and into the base of the duodenal bulb in 15 (38%). The fold appeared as a smooth or slightly lobulated submucosal mass in 37 (92%) patients and as a plaquelike lesion in three (8%). Other radiographic findings of antral gastritis were present in 26 (65%) patients. In nine patients who underwent endoscopy, endoscopic and/or histologic findings of antral gastritis were present in five, but none had evidence of tumor.

CONCLUSION

A hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold may be a sign of antral gastritis that is associated with characteristic radiographic findings. Endoscopy and biopsy may not be warranted when lesions with features typical of a hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold are seen on double-contrast barium studies.

Radiographic examination of the stomach and duodenum: comparison of single-, double- and biphasic-contrast methods

We compared retrospectively three groups of 150 patients who had undergone radiologic examinations of the stomach and duodenum. Each group was examined with a different barium suspension and radiographic technique: single-contrast (SC), double-contrast (DC), or biphasic-contrast (BC). The radiographs of each study were evaluated for technical quality and visualization of lesions. The number of X-ray exposures, films, and the amount of fluoroscopic time for each study were tabulated. The total radiation dose and cost for each technique were calculated. The BC examinations required the greatest number of radiographic exposures and X-ray films; however, cost was highest for the DC method. Fluoroscopy was significantly longer during the DC procedures, and the total radiation dose was also highest with this technique. Gaseous distention and barium coating of the stomach were equally good for the BC and DC groups, but X-ray penetration of the barium suspension during compression filming was significantly better in the BC and SC groups. Areae gastricae were most frequently seen during the BC studies and artifacts from excess secretions, barium flocculation or gas bubbles were least commonly present using this technique. Significantly more lesions were demonstrated in the stomach with the BC technique than with the other methods; however, the number of lesions found in the duodenum was the same for each technique.