Nonadjacent syndactyly in the congenital constriction band syndrome

Amniotic Constriction Bands: Secondary Deformities and Their Treatments

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report the surgical treatment experience of patients with amniotic constriction bands (ACB) over a 35-year interval and detail consequential limb deformities with emphasis on hands and upper extremities, along with the nature and frequency of their surgical treatment methods.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients were identified; 26 were males and 25 females. The total number of deformities was listed. The total number of operations, individual procedures, and operations plus procedures that were done for each patient and their frequency were recorded.

RESULTS

The total number of operations was 117, and total number of procedures was 341. More procedures were performed on the upper extremity (85%) than the lower extremity (15%). Including the primary deformity ACB, 16 different hand deformities secondary to ACB were encountered. Sixteen different surgical methods for the upper extremity were utilized; a primary procedure for ACB and secondary reconstructions for all secondary deformities. Average age at the time of the first procedure was 9.3 months. The most common procedures performed, in order of frequency, were excision of ACB plus Z-plasty, release of partial syndactyly, release of fenestrated syndactyly, full-thickness skin grafts, resection of digital bony overgrowth from amputation stumps, and deepening of first and other digital web spaces.

CONCLUSIONS

Many hand and upper extremity deformities secondary to ACB are encountered. Children with ACB may require more than one operation including multiple procedures. Numerous surgical methods of reconstruction for these children's secondary deformities are necessary in addition to the customary primary procedure of excision of ACB and Z-plasty.

Congenital syndactyly: outcome of surgical treatment in 131 webs

Congenital syndactyly is one of the most common congenital hand differences and various methods of surgical treatment have been described since the 19th century. Nevertheless, unsatisfactory results including web creep, flexion contractures, and rotational deformities of the fingers are still reported. This study presents the outcome of syndactyly release in 131 webs in 78 patients. The sex ratio was 40 males/38 females. The age ranged from 4 months to 22 years (average: 4 y). In the majority of the webs the result was good or excellent. The type of flaps used for the reconstruction of the web was important as the combination of a dorsal rectangular and 2 volar triangular flaps gave superior results than the use of 2 triangular flaps. The less rewarding overall outcome was obtained in the presence of associated differences of the involved fingers, that is, complex complicated syndactyly and in the cases of delayed correction. Use of a dorsal rectangular flap in combination with 2 volar triangular flaps and use of full thickness skin grafts, ensure a satisfactory outcome and minimize the number of operations per web.

Amniotic band syndrome: the association between rare facial clefts and limb ring constrictions

The pathologic cause of both rare craniofacial clefts and congenital limb ring constrictions is the subject of some debate. Uncommon though these two conditions are, they have often been anecdotally reported in association. This study sought to determine the frequency of congenital limb anomalies in general and limb ring constrictions in particular amongst a population of patients with rare craniofacial clefts. Eighty-five cases of nonsyndromal, rare, craniofacial cleft were identified from a population of 280 patients assessed at the Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, with a diagnosis of rare craniofacial cleft classifiable by the Tessier system. Twenty-two patients (25.9 percent) displayed congenital limb anomalies. Eleven of these (12.9 percent) showed evidence of limb ring constrictions, a frequency much greater than in the general population. The group with limb ring constrictions demonstrated a significantly greater complexity of involvement with craniofacial clefting than the non-limb ring constriction group (4.27 clefts/patient versus 2.3 clefts/patient, p < 0.01). The distribution of craniofacial cleft locations in patients with evidence of limb ring constrictions was found to differ significantly from those with other or no limb anomalies (p < 0.01). The clefts in cases in which limb ring constrictions coexist are largely restricted to the paramedian 2-12, 3-11, 412 axes. This study confirms an association between rare craniofacial clefts and limb ring constrictions. The two conditions may therefore possess common etiology.